The disclosed technology relates generally to devices, systems and methods for use in planting, including high-speed planting technologies, and in particular, to seed delivery devices having seed spacing features or components that provide flexible and controlled seed spacing at or near the seed furrow for accurate seed delivery to the furrow at a variety of speeds, including high speeds.
As agricultural planting technologies continues to improve, high-speed precision agriculture is fast becoming the industry standard. Under these high-speed parameters, agricultural planters are required to put seeds in the ground with precise and repeatable spacing between the seeds in order to maximize crop health and yield. This seed spacing must be maintained at any ground speed, including both high speeds and slower speeds. The ability to turn off seed dispensing or change the seed dispensing rate on individual rows is also highly desirable for various reasons, including, for example, to eliminate planting overlap and to keep seed spacing consistent across all rows on a curve.
Seed singulation and spacing are controlled in most known planting technologies by the seed meter. That is, existing seed metering designs use mechanical meters to both singulate the seeds and place them in the furrow at the desired spacing. Generally, seed spacing is determined in these designs by the spacing of the seed slots/openings in the metering disc and the speed at which the meter is operated.
According to one known seed delivery technology, once the seeds exit the seed meter, seed delivery typically consists of allowing the seeds to fall to the ground as a result of gravity via an unobstructed pathway between the seed meter and the furrow such as a seed delivery tube or the like. One such example of a gravity-based seed delivery device 50 is depicted in
Reliance on gravity for seed delivery has disadvantages. One such disadvantage relates to the fact that most row crop planters have a seed singulating meter that is located at a substantial distance from the soil surface. The result is that rapid vertical movement as the planter unit follows the field terrain can affect the seed drop from the meter and result in inaccurate spacing. Another disadvantage is that the forward travel speed of the planter is limited by the reliance on gravity for seed delivery. That is, delivery of the seed via gravity means that the planter must travel in a limited speed range in order to prevent inaccurate seed spacing. More specifically, due to gravity, the seed is falling at a steady, unchangeable rate (equal to about 5.5 MPH when it contacts the soil). As a result, if the planter is traveling slower than that, the seed may roll rearward in the furrow. In contrast, if the planter is traveling faster than 5.5 MPH, the seed may roll forward in the furrow. Hence, the speed of the planter can result in inaccurate spacing, which can result in reduced yields in the field.
Newer known seed delivery technologies have included delivery mechanisms to mechanically deliver seed to a location closer to the seed furrow, thereby reducing the effects of gravity and accelerating the seed discharge velocity so the planter can be operated at faster travel speeds. An example of a mechanical seed delivery device 56 is depicted in
However, these mechanical delivery mechanisms have disadvantages as well. For example, these seed delivery devices require a specifically designed seed meter to operate in conjunction with the delivery mechanism. Also, in these mechanisms, the seed spacing is still ultimately controlled at the seed meter when the seed is transferred from the meter to the delivery mechanism. That is, the delivery mechanism cannot improve spacing errors caused by a poor transfer of the seed from the meter. A further disadvantage of these mechanical devices that utilize belts with paddles and similar configurations is a spacing accuracy limitation inherent to its design. The seeds per second delivered from the meter to the seed delivery mechanism are determined by the desired population and the travel speed. In contrast, the delivery belt speed is determined solely by the travel speed of the planter. Since the paddle spacing on the belt is fixed (approximately ⅝ inches for most such belts), the narrowest seed spacing achievable is equal to the paddle spacing (⅝″) and multiples of that. Hence, the minimum spacing that can be achieved is determined by the construction of the belt (the size of the seed chambers between the paddles) and greater seed spacings are a multiple of the spacing determined by the construction of the belt. As a result, the seeds per second singulated from the meter and the seeds per second delivered by the belt are not in synch, and this can lead to inaccurate spacing as the seed is transferred from the meter to the belt.
Another relatively new but known seed delivery technology is the use of air velocity (or pressure) to accelerate the seed from the meter to the furrow. One such example is depicted in
However, one disadvantage of these air-based delivery mechanisms is that they are limited to only operating effectively at high speeds, not a range of speeds that will ultimately be determined by field conditions. While some known air-based delivery devices compensate for the seed velocity by delivering the seed under a press wheel that traps the seed, such wheels can cause problems by lifting seed from the soil (and leaving them on top of the soil surface, rather than beneath the surface) in poor conditions, such as wet soil.
There is a need in the art for improved systems, methods, and devices for spacing seeds during delivery to the seed furrow in both conventional and high-speed planting implements.
Discussed herein are various seed delivery systems, including seed spacing devices and systems. Also included are row units and planting systems that incorporate the seed spacing and delivery devices and systems.
In Example 1, an system for controlling seed spacing in a field comprises a seed metering device constructed and arranged to singulate seed, a seed delivery channel comprising a proximal opening at a proximal end in communication with the seed metering device and a distal opening at a distal end, a seed spacing device disposed adjacent to the distal end of the seed channel, the seed spacing device comprising a seed ejection wheel rotatably disposed therein, and a seed ejection wheel actuator operably coupled to the seed ejection wheel, the actuator constructed and arranged to control starting, stopping, and rotational speed of the seed ejection wheel.
Example 2 relates to the system according to Example 1, wherein the seed spacing device comprises a housing, wherein the seed ejection wheel is rotatably disposed within the housing, a seed intake channel in communication with the distal opening of the seed channel such that the seed intake channel is constructed and arranged to receive seeds from the seed channel, and a seed ejection opening defined in the housing.
Example 3 relates to the system according to Example 1, wherein the seed ejection wheel comprises at least three seed chambers defined along an outer periphery of the wheel.
Example 4 relates to the system according to Example 3, wherein the at least three seed chambers are defined by at least three projections extending radially from the wheel.
Example 5 relates to the system according to Example 1, wherein the seed ejection wheel comprises a core wheel and a plurality of bristles coupled to an outer periphery of the core wheel and extending radially therefrom.
Example 6 relates to the system according to Example 1, further comprising an air pressure source operably coupled to the seed delivery channel.
Example 7 relates to the system according to Example 6, wherein the air pressure source is operably coupled to the seed delivery channel at or near the proximal end of the seed delivery channel, wherein the air pressure source is in fluidic communication with a lumen of the seed delivery channel.
In Example 8, a planting row unit comprises a seed metering system comprising a seed metering device constructed and arranged to singulate seed and a seed delivery system comprising an elongate seed channel, a seed spacing device disposed adjacent to the distal end of the seed channel, the seed spacing device comprising a housing and a seed ejection wheel rotatably disposed within the housing, and a seed ejection wheel actuator operably coupled to the seed ejection wheel, the actuator constructed and arranged to sequentially start and stop rotation of the seed ejection wheel in a series of cycles comprising a partial rotation. The seed channel comprises a lumen defined within the seed channel, a proximal opening defined at a proximal end, wherein the proximal opening is in communication with the seed metering device and the further is in communication with the lumen, and a distal opening defined at a distal end, wherein the distal opening is in communication with the lumen.
Example 9 relates to the planting row unit according to Example 8, wherein the seed spacing device comprises a seed intake channel in communication with the distal opening of the seed channel such that the seed intake channel is constructed and arranged to receive seeds from the seed channel, and a seed ejection opening defined in the housing.
Example 10 relates to the planting row unit according to Example 8, wherein the seed ejection wheel comprises at least three seed chambers defined along an outer periphery of the wheel.
Example 11 relates to the planting row unit according to Example 10, wherein the at least three seed chambers are defined by at least three projections extending radially from the wheel.
Example 12 relates to the planting row unit according to Example 8, wherein the seed ejection wheel comprises a core wheel and a plurality of bristles coupled to an outer periphery of the core wheel and extending radially therefrom.
Example 13 relates to the planting row unit according to Example 8, further comprising an air pressure source operably coupled to the seed delivery channel.
Example 14 relates to the planting row unit according to Example 13, wherein the air pressure source is operably coupled to the seed delivery channel at or near the proximal end of the seed delivery channel, wherein the air pressure source is in fluidic communication with the lumen of the seed delivery channel.
Example 15 relates to the planting row unit according to Example 8, wherein the partial rotation comprises about ⅓ of a full rotation.
Example 16 relates to the planting row unit according to Example 8, wherein the seed metering device and the seed spacing device are separated by a distance of several inches to several feet.
In Example 17, a method of controlling seed spacing in planting of seeds comprises singulating seed at an independently controllable rate toward a seed spacing device, controlling movement of the singulated seed toward the seed spacing device, receiving each metered singulated seed in the seed spacing device, and ejecting each metered singulated seed via the seed spacing device at a seed spacing in the seed furrow at an independently controllable rate.
Example 18 relates to the method according to Example 17, wherein the ejecting is correlated with seed spacing and planter speed.
Example 19 relates to the method according to Example 17, wherein the metering and receiving are sequentially and spatially separated.
Example 20 relates to the method according to Example 17, wherein the controlling movement of the singulated seed toward the seed spacing device further comprises moving the singulated seed toward the seed spacing device at a rate higher than a rate based solely on gravity.
While multiple embodiments are disclosed, still other embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which shows and describes illustrative embodiments of the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of modifications in various obvious aspects, all without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.
The various embodiments herein relate to agricultural planting systems having seed delivery systems and devices that provide precise and repeatable seed spacing that can be maintained at any ground speed, including the ground speeds of both conventional and high-speed planting systems. The various embodiments herein relate to seed delivery devices and systems that have a seed spacing mechanism or device that provides seed spacing and acceleration at a location near the seed furrow such that the seeds are spaced evenly in the furrow. More specifically, the various implementations are seed delivery systems or devices (or components thereof) that receive singulated seed from a seed meter (or other type of seed singulation device), transport the seed toward a seed spacing device near the seed furrow, and then use the seed spacing device to accelerate the seed into the furrow in a controlled manner. In certain embodiments, the seed spacing device can compensate for the forward travel speed of the planting system by ejecting individual seeds at a rearward velocity equal to the forward travel speed and further can adjust that ejection speed as the planter speed varies. Thus, it is understood that the various seed delivery systems and devices herein provide separation of seed singulation and seed spacing. While most planting systems rely on the seed metering device to both singulate and space the seeds, the various implementations disclosed or contemplated herein provide separate singulation and spacing devices, thereby providing for greater flexibility, control, and effectiveness of seed spacing in the furrow. It is understood that the various seed delivery and spacing implementations disclosed or contemplated herein can be incorporated into any known planting or seeding machine, such as, but not limited to, row crop planters, grain drills, air seeders, etc.
One example of a row unit 14 having a seed delivery system 40 with a seed spacing device 48, according to one embodiment, is depicted in greater detail in
Thus, it is understood that the various seed delivery and seed spacing implementations disclosed or contemplated herein can be incorporated into any known planters or planting systems, and further can be incorporated into each row unit therein.
One embodiment of a seed delivery system 80 with a seed spacing device 82 is depicted schematically in
The provision of pressurized air from the air pressure source 86 into the seed tube 84 such that the pressurized air is directed distally along the tube 84 toward the seed spacing device 82 creates a downward (or distal) airflow inside the tube 84. As such, each seed that is transferred from the seed meter 88 into the tube 84 is urged along the tube 84 toward the seed spacing device 82. This use of generated forces (via the force of air on the seed) can basically urge each seed at a predetermined velocity to reduce or eliminate the issues caused by relying solely on gravity, as described above.
At its proximal end, the seed tube 84 is adjacent to, coupled to, or otherwise in communication with a seed meter 88 as shown. It is understood that the singulation of the seeds occurs at the seed meter 88, and that the seed delivery system 80 (or any other delivery system embodiment disclosed or contemplated herein) can operate in conjunction with any known seed metering system, including any such system in combination with any type of planting system, including both conventional, precision, and/or high-speed planting systems. Two specific examples of commercially-available precision planting systems that can be incorporated into any planting system containing any seed delivery system herein are the INCOMMAND™ and/or SEEDCOMMAND™ precision agricultural systems available from Ag Leader Technologies in Ames, IA.
In this embodiment as shown in
Another characteristic of the various seed delivery system embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein is the separation of the seed singulation (in the seed meter, such as meter 88) and the seed spacing (in the seed spacing device, such as device 82). That is, the various seed delivery embodiments separate singulation and spacing both functionally (dividing those functions between the meter and the spacing device) and spatially (such that singulation occurs at the meter disposed adjacent to the proximal end of the delivery tube and spacing occurs at the spacing device adjacent to the soil surface). As such, while various known seed metering and delivery systems combine the seed singulation and spacing in the seed meter, the various implementations herein provide for both functional and spatial separation of those functionalities. Thus, in the various embodiments herein, control of seed singulation at the meter (such as meter 88) is fully and physically separated from control of seed spacing at the seed spacer (such as spacer 82) near the furrow.
The separation of seed singulation and seed spacing in the various seed delivery implementations disclosed or contemplated herein provides advantages for the planting of seeds. For example, the spacer (such as spacer 82) can be controlled based on the planter velocity to eject each seed at a speed that results in little or no offset from the planter velocity, resulting in minimal bounce of the seed in the furrow. Thus, the separation of seed singulation and seed spacing control allows for intentionally manipulating either singulation or spacing, or both, with greater control and variation than if both singulation and seed spacing were controlled at the seed meter (as is generally true of most known seed metering and delivery systems). For example, the seed meter (such as meter 88) might be operated faster than usual. Singulated seed could then be accelerated quickly to the seed spacer (such as spacer 82) and be received there such that the seed can be retained in the spacer (such as spacer 82) for a predetermined period of time before the spacer ejects the seed into the furrow, which is referred to herein as a “dwell time.” As will be discussed in further detail below, “dwell time,” as used herein, is intended to refer to the amount of time that the spacing device (such as spacer 82) is not rotating or otherwise moving and able to accept a seed from the seed meter (such as meter 88) via the delivery system. Thus, the acceleration of the seed through the tube (such as tube 84) and into the spacer (such as spacer 82) makes it possible to have an intentional “dwell time” at the seed spacer mechanism that can be used advantageously in the control of seed spacing at the trench, as will be discussed in further detail below. This further allows flexible adjustability of the parameters used to then operate the spacer to match or operate in conjunction with planter velocity. Various sensors and controllers can be used to accomplish this according to various embodiments, as will be discussed in additional detail below.
Another implementation of a seed delivery system 100 with a seed spacing device 102 is depicted in
In addition, certain embodiments of the system 100 can also have various sensors that provide information useful for operation of the overall planting system, including population monitoring and providing feedback to the operator and/or the system controller 112. One such exemplary sensor is a seed detection sensor 114 disposed at or near the inlet (not shown) of the seed spacer device 102, which can detect the presence of a seed at the inlet to the seed spacer 102. It is understood that other known sensors can be incorporated into the seed delivery system 100, and further into the planting system as a whole. For example, as shown in
Additional examples of known sensors that could be incorporated (and/or used as the seed detection sensor 114) include proximity sensors, such as the commercially-available sensor identified as Model #CM12-08EPB-KC1, which is available from SICK Sensors of Sick USA, which is located in Minneapolis, MN.
While not part of the seed delivery system 100 itself, the overall planting system obviously includes a seed meter 116 that is in communication with a meter controller 118 such that the seed meter 116 singulates and transfers seeds to the seed tube 104 in a fashion discussed above. The controller 118 can control the operation of the seed meter 116, thereby controlling the speed at which seeds are singulated and transferred into the seed tube 104. Further, a seed sensor 122 can also be provided, which can be placed next to or in the opening (not shown) between the seed meter 116 and seed tube 104 such that the sensor 122 detects each seed being transferred from the meter 116 into the seed tube 104. Alternatively the sensor 122 can be positioned anywhere near the meter 116 such that the sensor can detect any seed being transferred into the seed tube 104. The seed sensor 122 is in communication with the meter controller 118.
The pressure source controller 108 controls the amount of air pressure generated by the air pressure source 106 and thereby controls the speed at which each seed is urged distally/downward along the tube 104 toward the seed spacing device 102. In certain implementations, the controller 108 is set to provide air flow that urges each seed to be transported along the tube 104 at a speed that exceeds the speed that gravity would impart (thereby making dwell time at the spacer 102 possible as discussed in further detail above and below). In further embodiments, the set air flow speed is such that each seed is urged distally at a speed that is significantly higher than the speed resulting from gravity.
It is understood that any of the controllers as disclosed or contemplated herein in any of the various embodiments can be any type of processor that can be used to control any of the components in the various systems herein. For example, each controller can be a microprocessor, a computer, or any other type of processor that might be used in a known planting system.
In use, the meter controller 118 controls the seed meter 116 such that the meter 116 operates at a speed that provides the seeds into seed delivery system 100 at the appropriate speed and singulation to result in the desired planting population. To accomplish this, the meter 116 speed must be coordinated with the operation of the spacing device 102 (and the planting system as a whole). That is, the meter controller 118 must communicate with and coordinate with the spacing controller 110, which occurs via the planting system controller 112 in this specific embodiment. Alternatively, the two controllers 110, 118 can communicate directly. Thus, in certain embodiments, the meter seed sensor 122 can be used to detect the transfer of each seed from the meter 116 into the seed delivery tube 104 and communicate that information to the meter controller 118, which can communicate the information to the planting system controller 112 (or the sensor 122 can communicate directly with the controller 112). The controller 112 can use the seed detection information to predict or anticipate the arrival of the seed at the seed spacing device 102 (via passage along the tube 104). Further, the spacer controller 110 can be in communication with the system controller 112 and provide spacer 102 information such that the system controller 112 can compare the expected arrival time of the seed at the spacer 102 with the operating frequency of the spacer 102. As a result, the system controller 112 can communicate with the meter controller 118 or directly with the meter 116 to either advance or retard the rotation of the seed meter 116 to achieve or maintain the optimal seed delivery timing to the seed spacing device 102. Of course, it is understood that this meter sensor 122 can also be used to provide planter monitoring functions like actual population, skips, multiples, etc. (or it could be two or more sensors that monitor these parameters).
Alternatively, or additionally, the system controller 112 can communicate with the air pressure controller 108 or directly with the air pressure source 106 to either increase or decrease the air pressure provided to the seed tube 104 to further control the seed delivery timing to the seed spacing device 102. The acceleration of each seed by air pressure (or other means) through the tube 104 can help increase the available time window (dwell time) that the seed is present at the seed spacer 102, thereby allowing proper spacing to be achieved with the seed spacer 102. In other words, accelerating the seed along the seed tube 104 toward the spacing device 102 creates a larger separation between each seed and negates the adverse effects of relying entirely on gravity, such as vertical row unit movement and the like.
Thus, the meter controller 118, the air pressure controller 108, and the spacing controller 110 can all work together to control the metering, delivery, and spacing of each seed as described above. In the specific embodiment herein, the planting system controller 112 also operates in conjunction with the other three controllers 118, 108, 110 to accomplish the metering, delivery, and spacing, along with controlling the entire planting system. As such, it is understood that the controllers 118, 108, 110, 112 function together to operate the seed metering, delivery, and spacing as described above, while also allowing for increasing or decreasing the action of the various components (the meter 116, the air pressure from the generator 106, and the spacing device 102) to allow for changes in the planting unit speed, desired population rates, etc.
Of course, it is understood that the spacer controller 110 can be used independently to adjust the action of the seed spacer 102 and thereby modify seed spacing in the furrow, and these adjustments can be independent of the control of the seed meter 116 and/or the air pressure generator 106. Alternatively, as discussed in detail above, control of the seed meter 116, air pressure generator 106, and the seed spacer 102 can be coordinated according to predetermined relationships for beneficial results, as discussed above.
It is understood that any of the various features, components, and interactions of the seed delivery system 100 and the associated planting system overall as described in detail above can be incorporated into any other seed delivery or planting system embodiment disclosed or contemplated elsewhere herein.
One specific type of seed spacing device 142, according to one embodiment, is depicted in
In this specific embodiment, the motor 154 is a stepper motor 154. Alternatively, the motor 154 can be any known motor that can urge the wheel 142 to cyclically rotate for a partial rotation and immediate stop, as will be discussed in further detail below. Further, the motor 154 (and any motor for powering any spacing device according to any embodiment herein) can be any known actuator, such as a direct drive actuator or otherwise. Other specific known types of motors that can be used can include DC Servo or Brushless DC motors, for example. A commercially-available example of each is as follows: DC servo motor Model #M66CE-12, which is available from Mclennan, in Surry, United Kingdom; and brushless DC motor Model #BLY171S-15V-8000, which is available from Anaheim Automation, in Anaheim, CA (USA).
It is understood that the bristles or fingers 152 operate in a fashion similar to other known brush wheels or brush belts incorporated into various planter technologies such that a seed can be disposed within the bristles/fingers 152 and retained therein, but also such that the seed can be ejected when sufficient force is used.
With respect to the entire seed delivery system 140 as best shown in
As has been discussed elsewhere, the seed spacing device 142 is disposed near or adjacent to the soil surface such that ejection of each seed out of the ejection opening 150 results in the seed not having to travel a great distance before landing in the furrow, thereby reducing the risk of the seed rolling or otherwise moving once it lands in the furrow, thereby reducing seed spacing issues.
The following is a description of the operation of the seed delivery system 140 and the seed spacing device 142. While the description will focus on the system 140 of
In operation, the seed delivery system 140 and the seed spacing device 142 operate in the following fashion. Each seed is delivered from the hopper 166 to the seed meter 166, which singulates the seed into the seed delivery system 140. As best shown in
At the correct time based on forward travel of the planting system and the desired seed spacing in the furrow, the controller 156 causes the stepper motor 154 to accelerate the ejector wheel 144 and, thus, the seed 168 disposed therein, to a rearward velocity equal to the forward travel speed of the planter. In this example, the rotation direction of the wheel 144 as depicted in
The cyclical, partial rotation of the wheel 144 is depicted schematically in further detail in
At the same time, in this example, a new seed 168 is delivered into the housing 146 through the channel 148 and into the bristles or fingers 152 at t1 and is disposed there until the wheel 144 rotation begins again. Alternatively, it is understood that the system 140 can be configured to load more than one seed at a time into the wheel 144.
Thus, the ejector wheel 144 goes through a sequence of rotational motions that establish the spacing of the seed 168 in the furrow. That is, the seed 168 is transported from the seed meter 164 through the seed tube 158 and into the seed spacing wheel 144 at the appropriate time, at which point the wheel 144 is rotated (about ⅓ of a full rotation, in certain embodiments) such that the seed 168 is accelerated to match the travel speed of the planter and then ejected to the seed furrow, thereby establishing accurate spacing.
It is understood that the characteristics, features, and operation of this seed spacer 142 and motor 154 can be incorporated into any of the embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein. Thus, many implementations include a motor or actuator (such as motor 154) with highly precise and repeatable control that can start and stop the spacing wheel (such as wheel 144) at the required rate and frequency to sequentially eject seeds at the planter-velocity-matched-rate and at the required cycle times to meet modern planter speeds and seed spacings (which are understood to be antagonistic with one another in the sense that planter speeds are increasing and seed spacing is decreasing). Thus, in the various embodiments herein, the spacing wheel (such as wheel 144) can receive at least one singulated seed in the wheel's stationary state. The actuator (such as motor 154) can quickly accelerate the wheel and a seed over a partial rotation and abruptly stop the wheel. Momentum ejects the seed from the wheel to the seed furrow. Once the first seed is delivered to the furrow, the wheel (such as wheel 144) receives the next seed while still in its stopped state and then is accelerated and stopped according to the next cycle such that the next seed is ejected. This receive-start-stop-eject cycle is repeated at relatively high frequencies to meet preset seed spacing for present planter velocities.
In this embodiment and the other implementations disclosed or contemplated herein, the seed spacing accuracy is achieved because the seed 168 is delivered to the spacing wheel 144 more quickly than is possible if relying solely on gravity. Accelerating the seed travel to the ejector wheel 144 creates the dwell time (mentioned above) for the seed to be correctly spaced and delivered to the furrow under controlled conditions and eliminates any inaccuracies that might be caused by seed shape and air speed velocity. Based on the definition above, “dwell time” in the instant example is the amount of time that the spacing wheel 144 is not rotating and able to accept a seed 168 at t1 from the seed meter 164.
The application of air flow in the seed tube 158 makes it possible to deliver seed 168 to the seed spacing device 142 while the spacing device 142 is at rest, thereby making the dwell time possible. That is, the ability to accelerate the seed 168 toward and into the seed spacing device 142 at a speed faster than possible based solely on gravity makes it possible to create dwell times that can be used to space the seeds as desired in the furrow. This can be further understood by considering the following non-limiting real-world example. To deliver the seed 168 to the seed spacing device 142 with sufficient speed to ensure the seed 168 is disposed in the spacing device 142 during the dwell time, the critical factor is velocity. Assuming the planting system is operating at maximum capacity and the seed spacing wheel 144 needs to cycle 36 times per second at maximum capacity, that means it must cycle every 0.0278 second (because 1/36 equals 0.0278). Assuming the seed tube 158 is 18 inches in length such that the seed 168 needs to travel 18 inches from the time it leaves the seed meter 164 to the seed spacer 142, then the seed 168 must travel in excess of 36.82 miles per hour. This is because the seed must travel 648 inches per second (because 18×36=648 inches/second), which means it must travel 54 feet per second (because 648/12=54 feet per second), which means it must travel 3,240 feet per minute (because 54×60=3240 feet per min), which means it must travel 36.82 miles per hour (because 3240/88=36.82 MPH, because 1 mph=88 ft/min). Rounding up in this example, this means the seed 168 must to travel at at least 40 miles per hour to cover the 18 inch distance to the seed spacer 142 before the next seed is released from the singulating seed meter 164. While this speed seems fast, it is similar to the speed in feet/sec that known pneumatic grain conveyors can convey grain.
At this point, for improved understanding, a specific example of the operation of a seed spacing device (such as device 142) is set forth as well. Assuming a target seeding population rate of 35,000 seeds/acre and a forward planter travel speed of 10 miles per hour, the ejector wheel 144 would be required to operate at 30 Hz. Assuming each seed spacing cycle as described above is ⅓ of a complete revolution of the wheel 144, the revolutions per second would be 10 (or an average of 600 RPM), which is well within the limits for motors such as a stepper motor (like stepper motor 154), or other known motors with at least similar controllable operation. In order for the wheel 144 to accelerate the seed 168 to match the forward travel speed of the planter, the motor 154 must briefly reach an RPM determined by the outer diameter (“OD”) of the ejector wheel 144 (or the diameter at which the seed is retained in the wheel 144) and the forward travel speed of the planter. For example, if the ejector wheel 144 OD is 2.5″ and the travel speed of the planter is 10 mph, then the motor 154 will need to accelerate to 1350 RPM from 0 in each cycle. It is understood that that speed is also within normal operating boundaries for a stepper motor like motor 154. For example, at 36 cycles per second, each full cycle will last 0.0278 seconds. The time for the motor 154 to go from start to stop in that same period is 0.0234 seconds. This means a dwell time of 0.0044 seconds (because 0.0278−0.0234=0.0044 seconds). This includes both the acceleration time to match the planter ground speed and the braking time to stop, all within the 120-degree rotation. If the planter ground speed slows and/or the seeding rate declines, the dwell time increases because the time per full cycle increases, but the time the motor is operating does not change substantially. For example, at 30 cycles per second (instead of the original assumption of 36 cycles), the cycle time is 0.0333 seconds, which results in a dwell time of 0.0099 seconds (because 0.0333−0.0234=0.0099 seconds). This is more than double the dwell time at the 36 cycles per second. As a result, more erratic spacing of seeds being delivered to the spacing device 142 can be accepted and corrected. The motor “on-time” (the portion of the cycle in which the wheel is moving and thus the motor is actuating the wheel to move—including acceleration, maintaining speed, and deceleration of the wheel) is ultimately determined by the travel speed it is matching, but the acceleration rate is the same. Lower travel speeds will have somewhat longer motor “on-times”, but this is more than offset by the reduction in seeds per second.
It is understood that, according to one embodiment, the cycle of the wheel 144 between rotation and dwell time can also be calculated without a full stop in rotation. Instead, the wheel 144 could operate via an accelerate-then-decelerate cycle with the “dwell time” calculated during the slow speed portion of the rotation cycle.
The various features and operational parameters (including the necessity of dwell time, etc.) of the seed spacing device 142 also apply to and can be incorporated into any of the other seed spacing devices disclosed or contemplated herein. Further, it is understood that the seed delivery system 140 and the seed spacing device 142 and any of the features or components therein can be incorporated into any other planting system and/or seed delivery system embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein.
Another seed spacing device 180 is depicted in
Yet another seed spacing device 200 is depicted in
In operation, the wheel 202 operates in a fashion similar to the spacing wheels in the spacing devices discussed above. That is, the seed delivery system can urge a singulated seed into the housing 206 when the wheel 202 is not rotating or substantially decelerated (during dwell time) such that the seed is disposed into the space defined between two lobes 204. Upon actuation of the motor (not shown) and rotation of the wheel 202, the leading edge 208 of the lobe 204 would contact the seed and urge it in a clockwise fashion until the seed reaches a location at or near the bottom of the housing 206 where the seed is ejected out the exit tube 210, which is angled towards a seed furrow in the soil surface as the planting machine is moving from left to right as depicted in the figure. It is understood that, in certain embodiments, the seed spacing device 200 can operate in a fashion substantially similar to the seed spacing devices 142, 180 discussed in detail above.
A further seed spacing device 220 is depicted in
Further, it is understood that other seed spacing devices and wheels are contemplated within the spirit of the various embodiments discussed above. That is, other device configurations can be incorporated into the various system embodiments herein to accomplish the same seed spacing as described herein. In one alternative, instead of a physical wheel, the seed spacer can utilize pressurized air.
In addition, the various planting systems disclosed or contemplated herein can also have unique seed metering technologies.
Another seed metering device 270 that provides for active mechanical removal of seeds from a seed meter, according to a further embodiment. The device 270 has a seed metering disk 272, a seed stripper wheel 274 disposed adjacent to the disk 272, a motor 276 coupled to the stripper wheel, and a seed channel 278 disposed below the wheel 274 such that each seed removed from the disk 272 is urged into the channel 278. In one embodiment, the seed stripper wheel 274 has a frictional outer surface such that the wheel 274 can contact each seed on the disk 272 and frictionally remove that seed via the frictional outer surface of the wheel 274. In operation, the wheel 274 is disposed in contact with or immediately adjacent to the metering disk 272 in the position as shown such that as the disk 272 rotates, each opening 280 in the disk 272 is rotated into the path of the wheel 274 such that the wheel 274 contacts the seed in the opening 280 and pulls or otherwise urges the seed downward out of the opening 280 and into the channel 278. It is understood that the channel 278 is in communication with a seed delivery device (not shown) such that the seed is urged into the seed delivery device and ultimately delivered to the seed furrow. It is further understood that the metering device 270 can be incorporated into any of the seed planting systems and integrated with any of the seed delivery systems disclosed or contemplated herein. Further, the seed metering device 270 can also be incorporated into any other known planting systems and/or seed delivery systems.
Yet another seed metering device 290 that provides for active mechanical removal of seeds from a seed meter, according to yet another implementation. The device 290 has a seed metering disk 292, a seed stripper wheel 294 disposed adjacent to the disk 292, a motor 296 coupled to the stripper wheel, and a seed channel 298 disposed below the wheel 294 such that each seed removed from the disk 292 is urged into the channel 298. In one embodiment, the seed stripper wheel 294 has radial fingers (or “projections”) 300 extending from the wheel 294 such that the fingers 300 of the wheel 294 can contact each seed on the disk 292 and physically knock that seed from the disk 292 via the fingers 300. In operation, the wheel 294 is disposed in contact with or immediately adjacent to the metering disk 292 in the position as shown such that as the disk 292 rotates, each opening 302 in the disk 292 is rotated into the path of the wheel 294 such that the fingers 300 contact the seed in the opening 302 and knocks the seed downward out of the opening 302 and into the channel 298. It is understood that the channel 298 is in communication with a seed delivery device (not shown) such that the seed is urged into the seed delivery device and ultimately delivered to the seed furrow. It is further understood that the metering device 290 can be incorporated into any of the seed planting systems and integrated with any of the seed delivery systems disclosed or contemplated herein. Further, the seed metering device 290 can also be incorporated into any other known planting systems and/or seed delivery systems.
While the specific examples discussed herein with respect to the various planting system embodiments, including the various seed metering and seed delivery implementations, were discussed in the context of maize seeds, it is understood that these various embodiments can also be used in substantially similar or analogous ways to plant other seeds, including soybeans, cotton, grain sorghum, sugar beets, high value vegetable crops, and any other crop that is cultivated using row crop planting methods. Further, they can also be used to serially dispense other types of particles from a moving machine.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, persons skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/272,590, filed Feb. 11, 2019, and entitled “Seed Spacing Device For An Agricultural Planter and Related Systems and Methods,” which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application 62/628,767, filed Feb. 9, 2018, and entitled “Seed Spacing Device, System, and Method for Planters,” both of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
9439 | Colver | Dec 1852 | A |
140493 | Fulghum | Jul 1873 | A |
540458 | Robbins | Jun 1895 | A |
658348 | Crowley | Sep 1900 | A |
717048 | Stirling | Dec 1902 | A |
1220684 | Ray | Mar 1917 | A |
1264454 | Terrell | Apr 1918 | A |
1376933 | Gould, Jr. | May 1921 | A |
1397689 | Krotz | Nov 1921 | A |
1566187 | Fifer | Dec 1925 | A |
1997791 | Hoberg et al. | Apr 1935 | A |
2053390 | Bateman et al. | Sep 1936 | A |
2054552 | Wakeham | Sep 1936 | A |
2141044 | Rassmann | Dec 1938 | A |
2340163 | White | Jan 1944 | A |
2440846 | Cannon | May 1948 | A |
2510658 | Rassmann | Jun 1950 | A |
2566406 | Dougherty | Sep 1951 | A |
2589762 | Barnett et al. | Mar 1952 | A |
2673536 | Skinner | Mar 1954 | A |
2975936 | Rousek | Mar 1961 | A |
2980043 | Beck | Apr 1961 | A |
3077290 | Rehder | Feb 1963 | A |
3122283 | Walters | Feb 1964 | A |
3176636 | Wilcox et al. | Apr 1965 | A |
3233523 | Passaggio | Feb 1966 | A |
3253739 | Martin | May 1966 | A |
3272159 | Sanderson | Sep 1966 | A |
3325060 | Rehder | Jun 1967 | A |
3343507 | Smith | Sep 1967 | A |
3413941 | Roberson | Dec 1968 | A |
3693833 | Weitz | Sep 1972 | A |
3844357 | Ellinger | Oct 1974 | A |
3913503 | Becker | Oct 1975 | A |
3990606 | Gugenhan | Nov 1976 | A |
4002266 | Beebe | Jan 1977 | A |
4023509 | Hanson | May 1977 | A |
4026437 | Biddle | May 1977 | A |
4029235 | Grataloup | Jun 1977 | A |
4037755 | Reuter | Jul 1977 | A |
4193458 | Long | Mar 1980 | A |
4193523 | Koning | Mar 1980 | A |
4282985 | Yamamoto | Aug 1981 | A |
4324347 | Thomas | Apr 1982 | A |
4333561 | Schlegel | Jun 1982 | A |
4329911 | Schwerin | Nov 1982 | A |
4359104 | Haapala | Nov 1982 | A |
4417530 | Kopecky | Nov 1983 | A |
4449642 | Dooley | May 1984 | A |
4600122 | Lundie et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4653410 | Typpi | Mar 1987 | A |
4655296 | Bourgault | Apr 1987 | A |
4700785 | Bartusek | Oct 1987 | A |
4793511 | Ankum et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4865132 | Moore | Sep 1989 | A |
4878443 | Gardner | Nov 1989 | A |
4913070 | Morrison | Apr 1990 | A |
4949656 | Lyle et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4949869 | Ribouleau | Aug 1990 | A |
4986782 | severtson | Jan 1991 | A |
5065681 | Hadley | Nov 1991 | A |
5069779 | brown | Dec 1991 | A |
5074227 | Schwitters | Dec 1991 | A |
5103924 | Walker | Apr 1992 | A |
5163518 | Foley | Nov 1992 | A |
5170909 | Lundie | Dec 1992 | A |
5277257 | Thompson | Jan 1994 | A |
5366024 | Payne | Nov 1994 | A |
5427182 | Winter | Jun 1995 | A |
5479992 | Bassett | Jan 1996 | A |
5497837 | Kehrney | Mar 1996 | A |
5499683 | Bassett | Mar 1996 | A |
5501366 | Fiorido | Mar 1996 | A |
5601209 | Barsi et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5664507 | Bergland et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5697308 | Rowlett | Dec 1997 | A |
5709271 | Bassett | Jan 1998 | A |
5720233 | Lodico | Feb 1998 | A |
5765720 | Stufflebeam | Jun 1998 | A |
5799598 | Stufflebeam | Sep 1998 | A |
5829535 | Line | Nov 1998 | A |
5842248 | Stufflebeam et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848571 | Stufflebeam | Dec 1998 | A |
5862764 | Umemoto | Jan 1999 | A |
5936234 | Thomas et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5961573 | Hale | Oct 1999 | A |
5975283 | Riffe | Nov 1999 | A |
6003455 | Flamme | Dec 1999 | A |
6013020 | Meloul | Jan 2000 | A |
6068063 | Mayerle | May 2000 | A |
6068064 | Bettin | May 2000 | A |
6091997 | Flamme | Jul 2000 | A |
6142086 | Richard | Nov 2000 | A |
6260632 | Bourgault et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269758 | Sauder | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293438 | Woodruff | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6352042 | Martin | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6378619 | Mayerle | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6389999 | Duello | May 2002 | B1 |
6516733 | Sauder | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6640731 | Rowlett | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651570 | Thiemke | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6681706 | Sauder et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6701857 | Jensen | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718892 | Rosenboom | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6748885 | Sauder et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752095 | Rylander et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6827029 | Wendte | Dec 2004 | B1 |
7131384 | Kester | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7263937 | Frasier | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7334532 | Sauder et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7395767 | Sulman | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404366 | Mariman | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7448334 | Mariman | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7490565 | Holly | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7581684 | des Garennes et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7584707 | Sauder et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7661377 | Keaton | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7673570 | Bassett | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7699009 | Sauder et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7717048 | Peterson, Jr. et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7854206 | Maschinen | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7870826 | Bourgault | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7918168 | Garner et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7938074 | Liu | May 2011 | B2 |
7980186 | Henry | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8020657 | Allard | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8056465 | Carlz | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8074586 | Garner et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8275525 | Kowalchuk | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8276529 | Garner et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8286566 | Schilling | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8322293 | Wollenhaupt et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8336471 | Gilstring | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8342258 | Ryder | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8346442 | Ryder | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8371239 | Rans et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8375873 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8375874 | Peterson | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8430179 | Van Buskirk | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8443742 | Orrenius | May 2013 | B2 |
8448585 | Wilhelmi et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8448717 | Adams et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8451449 | Holland | May 2013 | B2 |
8468960 | Garner et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8479671 | Shoup | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8522699 | Garner et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8522889 | Adams et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8544397 | Bassett | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8544398 | Bassett | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8550020 | Sauder et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561472 | Sauder et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8573111 | Graham | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8634992 | Sauder et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636077 | Bassett | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8671856 | Garner et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8677914 | Stark | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8746159 | Garner et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8755049 | Holland | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8763713 | Bassett | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8770308 | Bassett | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8776702 | Bassett | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8789482 | Garner et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8789483 | Gilstring | Jul 2014 | B2 |
RE45091 | Bassett | Aug 2014 | E |
8800457 | Garner et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8813663 | Garner et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8814474 | Bell | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8850995 | Garner | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8850998 | Garner et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8863857 | Bassett | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8910582 | Mariman et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8924092 | Achen | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8924102 | Sauder et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8942896 | Magerle | Jan 2015 | B2 |
RE45412 | Sauder et al. | Mar 2015 | E |
8978564 | Hagny | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8985037 | Radtke | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8985232 | Bassett | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9055712 | Bassett | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9107337 | Bassett | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9107338 | Bassett | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9113589 | Bassett | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9119342 | Bonefas | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9137941 | Stark | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9144187 | Bassett | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9144189 | Stoller | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9148992 | Staeter | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9151388 | Gilstring | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9167740 | Bassett | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9173339 | Sauder et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9192089 | Bassett | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9213905 | Lange et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9226440 | Bassett | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9232687 | Bassett | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9265191 | Sauder | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9277688 | Wilhelmi | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9282691 | Wilhelmi | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9282692 | Wilhelmi | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9288937 | Sauder et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9301438 | Sauder et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9313941 | Garner et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9313942 | Wilhelmi | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9332689 | Baurer | May 2016 | B2 |
9338937 | Sauder et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9345188 | Garner et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9351440 | Sauder | May 2016 | B2 |
9426940 | Connors et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9433141 | Friestad et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9462744 | Isaacson | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9480199 | Garner et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9491901 | Gentili | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9510498 | Tuttle et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9510502 | Garner et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9532496 | Sauder et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9554504 | Houck | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9578802 | Radtke | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9585301 | Lund | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9603298 | Wendte et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9622402 | Kinzenbaw et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9629301 | Gentili | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9629302 | Gentili | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9661799 | Garner et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9675002 | Roszman | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9675004 | Landphair et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9681601 | Bassett | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9686906 | Garner et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9693498 | Zumdome | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9699955 | Garner et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9699958 | Koch | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9706702 | Wendte et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9723778 | Bassett | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9733634 | Prickel | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9746007 | Stoller | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9750174 | Sauder et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9752596 | Sauder | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9769978 | Radtke | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9788472 | Bassett | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9756779 | Wilhelmi et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9807921 | Levy et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9807922 | Garner et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9807924 | Garner et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9814172 | Achen et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9814176 | Kowalchuk | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9820427 | Hagny | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9820429 | Garner et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9848522 | Bassett | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9848523 | Sauder | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9861025 | Schaefer et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9861031 | Garner et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9872424 | Baurer et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9879702 | Stoller | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9936627 | Wilhelmi et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9936628 | Wilhelmi et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9949426 | Radtke | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9955623 | Sauder et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9980426 | Wilhelmi et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10004173 | Garner et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10010024 | Pirkenseer et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10051782 | Wilhelmi et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10104832 | Wilhelmi et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10104830 | Heathcote | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10143128 | Landphair et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10154623 | Wilhelmi et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10206326 | Garner et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10257973 | Hubner et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10299425 | Sauder et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10398077 | Radtke | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10470358 | Sauder et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10485159 | Wilhelmi et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10548259 | Heathcote | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10609857 | Sauder et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10645865 | Bassett | May 2020 | B2 |
10729063 | Garner et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10743460 | Gilbert et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10806070 | Garner et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
11058048 | Radtke | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11144775 | Ferrari et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11202404 | Walter et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11277961 | Campbell | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11523554 | Buehler | Dec 2022 | B2 |
11785881 | Buehler et al. | Oct 2023 | B2 |
11877530 | Barry et al. | Jan 2024 | B2 |
20020056407 | Milne | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073678 | Lucand | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030005867 | Richard | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030183141 | Bergere et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040139895 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050172873 | Mayerle | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060086295 | Jensen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080110382 | Brockmeier | May 2008 | A1 |
20090056531 | Jessen | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100180808 | Liu | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192818 | Garner | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100224110 | Mariman | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100319941 | Peterson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110027479 | Reineccius | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110313575 | Kowalchuk | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120186503 | Sauder | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130032363 | Curry et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130126460 | Kenley | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130248212 | Bassett | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130333601 | Shivak | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140026748 | Stoller | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140060869 | Blunier | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140116735 | Bassett | May 2014 | A1 |
20140214284 | Sauder et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140216771 | Bassett | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140262378 | Connors | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140303854 | Zielke | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150094916 | Bauerer et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150176614 | Stoller | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150195988 | Radtke | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150264857 | Achen | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150271986 | Sauder et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150305229 | Sauder | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150319919 | Sauder | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150351315 | Wendte | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160007521 | Kusler | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160040692 | Stoller | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160128269 | Helmick | May 2016 | A1 |
20160128272 | Sauder | May 2016 | A1 |
20160143213 | Kowalchuk | May 2016 | A1 |
20160157412 | Sauder | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160212932 | Radtke | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160227700 | Wendte | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160249525 | Baurer et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170013771 | Townsend | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170034995 | Wilhelmi | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170086347 | Sauder | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170094889 | Garner | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170223947 | Gall et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170354079 | Foster | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170357029 | Lakshmanan | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170367252 | Sakaguchi | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180015490 | Grimm | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180092287 | Garner | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180092288 | Garner | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180125000 | Levy | May 2018 | A1 |
20180132422 | Hassanzadeh et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180132423 | Rowan | May 2018 | A1 |
20180210443 | Matsuzaki | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180263174 | Hodel | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180368310 | Zimmerman | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180373264 | Madsen | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190029165 | Leimkuehler et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190059206 | Stanhope | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190072114 | Myers et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190124824 | Hubner | May 2019 | A1 |
20190174666 | Manternach | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190254223 | Eichhorn et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190297769 | Zielke et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190297774 | Hamilton | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190373801 | Schoeny | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200029486 | Buehler et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200068783 | Strnad | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200100419 | Stanhope | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200128723 | Eichhorn | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200154629 | Holoubek et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200221630 | Pomedli | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200305335 | Schoeny | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200329631 | Johnson | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200352088 | Arnett | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200359552 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200359559 | Koch | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200375081 | Holoubek | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210022286 | Gilbert et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210037699 | Wilhelmi | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210059102 | Geistkemper | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210120726 | Barrick | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210153421 | Holoubek et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210185903 | Demiter et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210235611 | Fett | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210243941 | Buehler | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210307236 | Strnad et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20220000008 | Hubner et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220061202 | Holoubek et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220142039 | Eichhorn et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220151138 | Barry | May 2022 | A1 |
20220174855 | Zielke et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220192080 | Goza et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220232753 | Van De Woestyne et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20230105245 | Buehler | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230180653 | Barry et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230232732 | Hartogh | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230232733 | Barry | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230388458 | Eichhorn et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230413720 | Barry et al. | Dec 2023 | A1 |
20240040955 | Barry | Feb 2024 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2006203367 | Feb 2007 | AU |
102016002919 | Aug 2016 | BR |
102015003633 | Feb 2021 | BR |
1218266 | Feb 1987 | CA |
2213354 | Jul 2002 | CA |
2213703 | Jul 2002 | CA |
2213350 | Sep 2002 | CA |
2549371 | Nov 2007 | CA |
2584736 | Sep 2008 | CA |
2923713 | Dec 2016 | CA |
2830627 | May 2019 | CA |
2915844 | Apr 2020 | CA |
112601450 | Apr 2021 | CN |
389840 | Feb 1924 | DE |
2011462 | Sep 1971 | DE |
2826658 | Apr 1981 | DE |
8400142 | May 1984 | DE |
3405031 | Apr 1985 | DE |
0047577 | Mar 1982 | EP |
0152048 | May 1986 | EP |
0182220 | Apr 1990 | EP |
372901 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0606541 | Jan 1997 | EP |
2688384 | Jan 2014 | EP |
2832203 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2911497 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2911499 | Feb 2015 | EP |
1461989 | May 2015 | EP |
3108731 | Dec 2016 | EP |
1503687 | Dec 1967 | FR |
2414288 | Aug 1979 | FR |
2591061 | Jun 1986 | FR |
2574243 | Jun 1987 | FR |
18381 | Oct 1904 | GB |
482789 | Apr 1937 | GB |
989145 | Apr 1965 | GB |
2012534 | Aug 1979 | GB |
2057835 | Apr 1981 | GB |
2309622 | Jun 1997 | GB |
56-24815 | Mar 1981 | JP |
H1159886 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2007117941 | May 2007 | JP |
4517467 | Aug 2010 | JP |
1005451 | Sep 1998 | NL |
2355152 | May 2009 | RU |
948316 | Aug 1982 | SU |
1148582 | Apr 1985 | SU |
1998049884 | Nov 1998 | WO |
2005011358 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2009134144 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2010059101 | May 2010 | WO |
2010124360 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2013130003 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2014153157 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015171908 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2017160860 | Sep 2017 | WO |
2017197274 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2017197292 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2021021594 | Feb 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Zimmerman Manufacturing LLC “Contour King St Gallery”. |
Zimmerman Manufacturing LLC “Contour King St” Zimmerman Manufacturing Equipment. |
Precision Planting “FurrowForce” https://www.precisionplanting.com/products/product/furrowforce. |
Precision Planting “FurrowJet” https://www.precisionplanting.com/products/product/furrowjet. |
Kasper et al. “Relationship Between Six Years of Corn Yields and Terrain Attributes.” 2003, Precision Agriculture vol. 4, pp. 87-101. |
Orthman “1tRIPr Precision Tillage System” Brochure. |
Deere “SeedStar XP Monitor for Planters” pp. 70-78 - 70-9. |
ZML Contour King—YouTube Video—https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-rj_EZMCM4. |
Dawn Equipment—Twitter Video—https://twitter.com/DawnEquipment/status/969698839409111045. |
AG Leader Technology, “AG Leader SureSpeed”, Feb. 17, 2020, Publisher: YouTube. |
AG Leader Technology, “AG Leader SureSpeed Unveiling”, Feb. 12, 2020, Publisher: Youtube. |
Kinze Manufacturing, “True Speed—3D with Ultra Slow Motion”, Feb. 24, 2020, Publisher: YouTube. |
Kinze Manufacturing, “High Speed Planting Solution True Speed”, 2020, Publisher: Kinze. |
Kinze Manufacturing, “An In-Depth Look into Kinze's True Speed”, Feb. 26, 2020, Publisher: YouTube. |
Tempo, 2017, Publisher: Vaderstad. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220061208 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62628767 | Feb 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16272590 | Feb 2019 | US |
Child | 17499465 | US |