The present invention generally relates to the field of retaining walls and, more specifically, to retaining wall blocks and techniques for assembling a retaining wall unit of retaining wall blocks.
Retaining walls are widely used in a variety of landscaping applications. Typically, they are used for functional reasons to maximize or create level areas and/or to reduce erosion. They may also be used for purely decorative reasons. In the past, retaining wall construction was labor intensive and often required the skills of trained tradespeople such as masons and carpenters. More recently, retaining wall construction has become significantly simplified with the introduction of self-aligning, modular, molded blocks of concrete that may be stacked without the use of mortar or extensive training. With these types of retaining wall blocks, it is possible to erect a retaining wall quickly and economically, and the finished product creates the impression and appearance of a conventional block-and-mortar retaining wall.
The interconnection between adjacent levels (courses) of retaining blocks allows the retaining wall units to be easily, precisely, and reliably assembled. Typically, each retaining wall block will include a projection and a recess located at oppositely facing surfaces, such as a top surface and a bottom surface. The projection and recess are complementarily shaped, with the projection protruding beyond the top (or bottom) surface of the retaining block with the recess extending inwardly from the bottom (or top) surface of the block. In use, a projection of a first block is received within the recess of a second block to interconnect and position the blocks adjacent each other in a predetermined relation. With a plurality of retaining blocks, such interconnections make it possible to lay courses of blocks accurate and quickly. Moreover, such an assembled retaining wall will be able to resist some lateral forces exerted by the material being retained and reduce bowing. Blocks having these interconnections are generally the same size and may be assembled in a coplanar arrangement in only a simple, running bond pattern.
To further withstand the lateral forces exerted by the material being retained and thereby resist bowing or overturning, it is known to batter the retaining wall. In particular, the projection and recess of the retaining blocks may be arranged so that adjacent courses are offset a predetermined amount. With this type of retaining wall block, each successive course may be offset from the preceding course by the same amount so that the assembled wall is skewed at a predetermined angle from the vertical.
Depending on the height of the retaining wall, it may be desirable to adjust the amount of batter so as to avoid losing an excessive amount of land due to the setback of the wall. To adjust the setback, it has heretofore been necessary with conventional retaining wall systems to use a variety of block styles with differently shaped or located protrusions to change the batter of the wall. However, these retaining wall systems require numerous block types which increase the manufacturing costs of the retaining wall blocks and reduce the design flexibility. Other conventional retaining wall systems insert a spacer behind a protrusion extending from a top surface of the retaining blocks during assembly to increase the setback or batter of the retaining wall. However, this type of system only allows for one possible alternative setback amount, and makes construction of the retaining wall difficult due to the placement of the spacer.
The present invention has been developed in order to address the above-noted drawbacks. In particular, the invention is directed to a retaining wall block system (kit) and a method of assembling a retaining wall using such a retaining wall block system (kit).
In a first aspect, the invention is directed to a retaining wall block kit including a block having a front section, a rear section spaced apart from the front section, and a pair of laterally spaced apart side sections connecting the front section and the rear section to define a through-cavity extending through the block from a top face thereof to a bottom face thereof. The retaining wall block kit further includes an adjustable setback bar having a break line extending in a longitudinal direction of the setback bar between sides of the setback bar, and located along a widthwise centerline between the front surface and the rear surface.
The front section of the block has alignment knuckles protruding downwardly from a bottom surface of the front section at a location forward (in front of) of the through-cavity, and the alignment knuckles are laterally and evenly spaced apart from one another. The block has a receiver channel extending laterally across the top surface of the front section at a location forward of the through-cavity. The receiver channel is located and configured relative to the alignment knuckles so that two blocks can be stacked one atop the other with at least one of the alignment knuckles of the upper block engaged within the receiver channel of the lower block.
Depending on the desired setback (batter) of the retaining wall, the setback bar can be removably located within the receiver channel of the lower block so that the front surface of the setback bar abuts against a front surface of the receiver channel. The upper block is then position so that the alignment knuckles of the upper block abut against the rear surface of the setback bar within the receiver channel. The setback bar is also configured to be split along the break line, if desired. In particular, the setback bar can be 1″ in width when whole, and ½″ in width when split along the break line. When the setback bar is split and located within the receiver channel, the alignment knuckles of the upper block abut against the adjusted rear surface of the setback bar, which is an exposed surface of the split setback bar formed along the break line when the setback bar is split. Thus, the setback bar is adjustable or omitted altogether to change the distance between the alignment knuckles and a front surface of the receiver channel, and thereby allow the setback of the retaining wall to be easily changed as desired for the particular retaining wall application. Consequently, there is no need for a variety of different types of blocks to adjust the setback (batter) of the retaining wall, and the blocks can be stacked quickly and easily.
In one embodiment, there are three alignment knuckles protruding downwardly from the bottom surface of the front section and aligned and spaced apart along a straight line on the bottom surface. Furthermore, a rear side of the receiver channel can be open to the through-cavity. In other words, the receiver channel can have a front surface and bottom surface with the rear side being open to the through-cavity to allow easier stacking of blocks.
The front section of the block can have a densification groove around a base of each of the alignment knuckles. The densification groove is a compressed (compacted) area forming a recess surrounding each of the alignment knuckles, and this compressed area of the front section of the block is more dense than other areas of the block which are not formed as densification grooves. This densification groove improves the strength of each alignment knuckle, thereby minimizing the chance of accidental breakage or chipping of the alignment knuckles.
Each of the alignment knuckles has an oval shape including a straight front side and a straight rear side parallel to the straight front side. The front side and rear side of each of the alignment knuckles are also parallel to the rear surface of the front section forming a surface of the through-cavity, and are also parallel to the front surface of the receiver channel. Thus, the alignment knuckles can lay flat against the front surface of the receiver channel or flat against the rear surface of the setback bar.
The break line of the setback bar can be any linearly-arranged perforations, holes, groove, notches or the like that are formed along the widthwise centerline located between the front surface and the rear surface of the setback bar, and which allow the setback bar to be snapped (split) along the widthwise centerline, preferably by hand. In particular, the break line can be a groove having a depth extending in a heightwise direction through the setback bar and extending all or most of the length of the setback bar to allow the setback bar to be split by hand. Such a groove forms a smooth adjusted rear surface against which the one or more alignment knuckles of the upper block can abut. By omitting the setback bar entirely from the receiver channel before placing the upper block, the setback (batter) of the retaining wall will be ⅛″. However, by first splitting the setback bar along the break line (for example, to produce an adjusted setback bar having a width of ½″) and then inserting the front half of the setback bar into the receiver channel, the setback (batter) of the retaining wall will be ⅝″. If the setback bar is not split and instead is placed in the receiver channel as a whole (for example, having a width of 1″), the resulting setback (batter) of the retaining wall will be 1⅛″.
The front section of the block can have three non-planar front surface sections (a tri-plane), or can have one planar front surface. In addition, the front surface can have a left and/or right score which aids in alignment of the blocks.
The invention is also directed to a method of assembling a retaining wall using multiple retaining wall block kits. Each retaining wall block kit is configured as described above including a block and a setback bar. The method includes first choosing one of a first setback (batter), a second setback (batter), and a third setback (batter) for the retaining wall based on design criteria for the retaining wall. The first setback is smaller than the second setback, and the second setback is smaller than the third setback. For example, the first setback can be ⅛″, the second setback can be ⅝″, and the third setback can be 1⅛″. After choosing the desired setback, the setback bar is omitted, adjusted and arranged within the receiver channel, or simply arranged within the receiver channel without adjustment to achieve the desired setback.
In particular, if the first (smallest) setback is chosen, the setback bar is omitted from (i.e., not inserted within) the receiver channel of the block of the first retaining wall block kit. If the second (middle or medium-sized) setback is chosen, the setback bar is split along the break line and placed within the receiver channel. If the third (largest) setback is chosen, the setback bar is placed within the receiver channel without adjustment or modification such that the front surface of the setback bar abuts against the front surface of the receiver channel.
A block of one retaining wall block kit is then stacked atop a (lower) block of another retaining wall block kit so that one or more of the alignment knuckles of the (upper) block engage within the receiver channel of the lower block. The stacking is performed so that the one or more of the alignment knuckles of the upper block abuts against either (i) the front surface of the receiver channel if the first (smallest) setback is chosen, (ii) the adjusted (newly formed) rear surface of the setback bar if the second setback is chosen and the setback bar is split, or (iii) the rear surface of the unmodified setback bar if the third (largest) setback is chosen. Thus, the setback bar is adjustable (modified or omitted altogether) to allow the setback of the retaining wall to be easily changed as desired for the particular retaining wall application without the need for using different types and sizes of blocks, and while also allowing quick and easy assembly.
As noted above, there can be three alignment knuckles aligned along a straight line on the bottom face of each block. However, during assembly of the retaining wall, the inner one of the three alignment knuckles of the (upper) block of the second retaining wall block kit can be removed prior to stacking the (upper) block of the second retaining wall block kit atop the (lower) block of the first retaining wall block kit to form a retaining wall with a concave radius. Alternatively, the outer two of the three alignment knuckles of the (upper) block of the second retaining wall block kit can be removed prior to stacking the (upper) block of the second retaining wall block kit atop the (lower) block of the first retaining wall block kit to form a retaining wall with a convex radius.
The through-cavity of the block of each of the first and second retaining wall block kit can also be filled with crushed aggregate to provide additional interlock and mass to the retaining wall. In addition, geogrid can be applied between the (lower) block of the first retaining wall block kit and the (upper) block of the second retaining wall block kit to improve stability of the retaining wall.
A detailed description of the present invention will be provided below with reference to the drawings, in which:
A retaining wall block kit 100 as shown in
Each block 10 is made from dry-cast concrete to comply with ASTM-1372, and each block 10 is a one square foot unit. All blocks (units) 10 are made from the same mold, and inserts can be added into the mold to produce a left and/or a right score 25 in a front surface 26. Splitting can create a tri-plane block 10, which is a block 10 with the tri-plane splitface having three non-planar surfaces 26a, 26b, 26c, as shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The break line 23 of the setback bar 20 can be any perforations, holes, a groove, notches or the like that are linearly-arranged along the widthwise centerline CL located between the front surface 21 and the rear surface 22 of the setback bar 20 so as to allow a relatively clean break along the widthwise centerline CL, as applicable. Thus, the size/depth of the perforations, holes, groove, notches, or the like forming the break line 23 should be sufficient to allow the setback bar 20 to be snapped (split) along the widthwise centerline CL, preferably by hand. For example, as illustrated in
By omitting the setback bar 20 entirely from the receiver channel 40 before placing (stacking) the upper block 10, the setback (batter) of the retaining wall will be the default setback, which is ⅛″ in the example described above. However, by first splitting the setback bar 20 along the break line 23, an adjusted setback bar having a smaller width (for example, an adjusted width of ½″ as in the example noted above) will be produced. By arranging this adjusted setback bar 20 (for example, the front half of the setback bar 20) within the receiver channel 40, the setback (batter) of the retaining wall will be increased, for example, by ½″ to a setback of ⅝″ for 8″ of height in the specific example discussed above. If, however, the setback bar 20 is placed in the receiver channel 40 as a whole without being split, the setback (batter) of the retaining wall will be further increased. Again, referring to the particular example described above in which the default setback is ⅛″ and the setback bar is 1″ in width when not split, the resulting setback (batter) of the retaining wall will be 1⅛″ for 8″ of height.
Thus, the removable setback bar provides for easy adjustment of the setback (batter) of the retaining wall, depending on the particular application. After the desired amount of the setback is determined, and the setback bar 20 (in whole or in part) is arranged in the receiver channel 40 or omitted entirely, the upper block 10 is then position so that the one or more of the alignment knuckles 30 of the upper block 10 abut against the rear surface of the setback bar 20 within the receiver channel 40.
As shown in
One or more of the alignment knuckles 30 protruding downwardly from the bottom surface of the front section 11 of each block 10 can also be removed during assembly of the retaining wall, if desired to provide some flexibility in the shape of the retaining wall. In this regard, although the present invention is certainly not limited to blocks 10 having three evenly-spaced alignment knuckles 30 as described above, such an arrangement provides an opportunity for quick and easy modifications to achieve a desired retaining wall shape. In particular, during assembly of the retaining wall, the middle one of the three evenly-spaced alignment knuckles 30 of an upper block 10 can be removed prior to stacking the upper block 10 atop a lower block 10 to form a retaining wall with a concave radius. Alternatively, the outer two of the three alignment knuckles 30 of the upper block 10 can be removed prior to stacking the upper block 10 atop the lower block 10 to form a retaining wall with a convex radius. When forming a relatively straight segment of a retaining wall (i.e., with no convex or concave radius), all of the alignment knuckles 30 can remain to serve as guides for proper alignment of the blocks 10.
As also shown in
The invention is also directed to a method of assembling a retaining wall using a pair of (first and second) retaining wall block kits 100. Each of the retaining wall block kits 100 is configured as described above including a block 10 and a setback bar 20. First, one of a first setback d (batter), a second setback d′ (batter), and a third setback d″ (batter) for the retaining wall is chosen based on design criteria for the retaining wall (e.g., the height and location of the retaining wall), as shown in
In particular, if the first (smallest) setback d is chosen, the setback bar 20 is omitted from (i.e., not inserted within) the receiver channel 40 of the (lower) block 10 of the first retaining wall block kit 100. If the second (intermediate) setback d′ is chosen, the setback bar 20 is split along the break line 23 as discussed above, and placed within the receiver channel 40 such that the front surface of the setback bar 20 abuts against a front surface of the receiver channel 40. In this case, the newly exposed surface along the break line 23 formed when the setback bar 20 is split becomes an adjusted rear surface of the setback bar 20. If the third (largest) setback d″ is chosen, the setback bar 20 is placed within the receiver channel 40 without adjustment or modification such that the front surface of the setback bar 20 abuts against the front surface of the receiver channel 40.
The (upper) block 10 of the second retaining wall block kit 100 is then stacked atop the lower block 10 so that one or more of the alignment knuckles 30 of the upper block 10 is engaged within the receiver channel 40 of the lower block 10. The stacking is performed so that the one or more of the alignment knuckles 30 of the upper block abuts against either (i) the front surface of the receiver channel 40 if the first (smallest) setback d is chosen (see
The through-cavity 14 of the block 10 of each retaining wall block kit can also be filled with crushed aggregate to provide additional interlock and mass to the retaining wall. In addition, geogrid can be applied between the lower and upper blocks 10 when assembling the retaining wall to improve stability of the retaining wall. For example, if the height of the retaining wall will be greater than 3 feet, the retaining wall can be reinforced with geogrid laid between upper and lower blocks 10 without affecting the benefits of the retaining wall block kit 100 including the block 10 and setback bar 20 as described above.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
250635 | McLean | Dec 1881 | A |
2482556 | Petras | Sep 1949 | A |
5064313 | Risi et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5252017 | Hodel | Oct 1993 | A |
5257880 | Janopaul, Jr. | Nov 1993 | A |
5282700 | Rodrigue | Feb 1994 | A |
D346667 | Blomquist et al. | May 1994 | S |
D363787 | Powell | Oct 1995 | S |
5528873 | Correia | Jun 1996 | A |
D384168 | Stevenson | Sep 1997 | S |
D397451 | Stevenson | Aug 1998 | S |
5816749 | Bailey, II | Oct 1998 | A |
5941042 | Dueck | Aug 1999 | A |
5951210 | Maguire et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6138426 | Mork et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6168354 | Martin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
D439678 | Blomquist et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
D445512 | Sievert | Jul 2001 | S |
D459487 | Bott | Jun 2002 | S |
6474036 | Martin et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
D467009 | Agee | Dec 2002 | S |
6615561 | MacDonald et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6709201 | Race | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6827527 | Conkel et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6921231 | Rainey et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
D509911 | Shillingburg | Sep 2005 | S |
7059808 | Risi | Jun 2006 | B2 |
D539436 | Magliocco et al. | Mar 2007 | S |
7360970 | Woolford et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
D587382 | Wauhop | Feb 2009 | S |
7503730 | Price | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7591447 | Hammer et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7731455 | Shin | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7963727 | Wauhop | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7971407 | MacDonald | Jul 2011 | B2 |
D645165 | Wolter et al. | Sep 2011 | S |
D645575 | Bone | Sep 2011 | S |
D663858 | MacDonald | Jul 2012 | S |
8371086 | Shillingburg | Feb 2013 | B1 |
D689203 | MacDonald | Sep 2013 | S |
8734060 | Wauhop | May 2014 | B1 |
D708765 | MacDonald | Jul 2014 | S |
D713057 | Mugge et al. | Sep 2014 | S |
8851803 | Bott | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9028175 | Friederichs et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9273444 | Walling | Mar 2016 | B2 |
D867620 | Pegg | Nov 2019 | S |
20020028114 | Whitson | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20040022587 | Conkel | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040159065 | Burgess | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050091940 | Whitson | May 2005 | A1 |
20060171784 | Shaw | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080244995 | Kemp | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090116911 | Shaw | May 2009 | A1 |
20120057939 | Bone | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120279163 | MacDonald et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120311943 | Gran | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20190368152 | Rainey | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200230849 | Karau | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20210108390 | Matys | Apr 2021 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
ReCon Wall Systems, Inc., “Design and Construction Manual: An in Depth Guide for Specifiers, Engineers and Installers”, 5th Revision, Apr. 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220098816 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63084879 | Sep 2020 | US |