This invention relates to electric machines and, more particularly, to a switched reluctance electric machine including a segmented stator.
Reluctance electric machines, such as motors and generators, typically include a stator that is mounted inside a machine housing and a rotor that is supported for rotation relative to the stator. Reluctance electric machines produce torque as a result of the rotor tending to rotate to a position that minimizes the reluctance of the magnetic circuit and maximizes the inductance of an energized winding of the stator. A drive circuit generates a set of stator winding currents that are output to stator pole windings and that produce a magnetic field. In response to the magnetic field, the rotor rotates in an attempt to maximize the inductance of the energized winding of the stator.
In synchronous reluctance electric machines, the windings are energized at a controlled frequency. Control circuitry and/or transducers are provided for detecting the angular position of the rotor. A drive circuit energizes the stator windings as a function of the sensed rotor position. The design and operation of sensorless switched reluctance electric machines is known in the art and is discussed in T. J. E. Miller, “Switched Reluctance Motors and Their Control”, Magna Physics Publishing and Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Conventional switched reluctance electric machines generally include a stator with a solid stator core or a laminated stator with a plurality of circular stator plates that are punched from a magnetically conducting material and that are stacked together. The stator plates define salient stator poles that project radially inward and inter-polar slots that are located between the adjacent stator poles. The stator typically includes pairs of diametrically opposed stator poles. The rotor also typically includes pairs of diametrically opposed rotor poles. Windings or coils are wound around the stator poles. The windings that are wound around the pairs of diametrically opposed stator poles are connected to define a phase coil.
By providing current in the phase coil, magnetic fields are established in the stator poles that attract a pair of the rotor poles. The current in the phase coils is generated in a predetermined sequence in order to produce torque on the rotor. The period during which current is provided to the phase coil, while the rotor poles are brought into alignment with the stator poles, is known as the active stage of the phase coil.
At a predetermined point, either as the rotor poles become aligned with the stator poles or at some point prior thereto, the current in the phase coil is commutated to prevent a negative torque from acting on the rotor poles. Once the commutation point is reached, current is no longer output to the phase coil and the current is allowed to dissipate. The period during which current is allowed to dissipate is known as the inactive stage.
In order to maintain torque on the rotor, to thereby optimize machine efficiency, it is important to maintain the relationship between the position of the rotor and the active stage of each phase coil. If the active stage is initiated and/or commutated too early or too late with respect to the position of the rotor, a constant torque on the rotor will not be maintained and the machine will not operate at an optimum efficiency. Conventional switched reluctance electric machines attempt to maintain the relationship between the active stages of the phase coils and the position of the rotor by continuously sensing rotor position.
There are two distinct approaches for detecting the angular position of the rotor. In a “sensed” approach, an external physical sensor senses the angular position of the rotor. For example, a rotor position transducer (RPT) with a hall effect sensor or an optical sensor physically senses the angular position of the rotor. In a “sensorless” approach, electronics that are associated with the drive circuit derive the angular rotor position without an external physical sensor. For example, the rotor position can be derived by measuring the back electromotive force (EMF) in an unenergized winding. In U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,107,772, 6,011,368 to Kalpathi et al, U.S. Pat. No. 5,982,117 to Taylor et al, U.S. Pat. No. 5,929,590 to Tang et al, U.S. Pat. No. 5,883,485 to Mehlhorn, U.S. Pat. No. 5,877,568 to Maes et al, U.S. Pat. No. 5,777,416 to Kolomeitsev, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,772,839 to MacMinn, which are hereby incorporated by reference, a drive circuit estimates the rotor position from the inductance of the phase coil.
Another sensorless approach outputs diagnostic pulses to the unenergized windings and senses the resulting electrical response. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,596 to MacMinn, et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,518 to Vitunic, which are hereby incorporated by reference, a drive circuit employs voltage sensing pulses that are output to an inactive phase coil.
In switched reluctance electric machines using the “sensed” approach, the RPT detects the angular position of the rotor with respect to the stator. The RPT provides an angular position signal to the drive circuit that energizes the windings of the switched reluctance electric machine. The RPT typically includes a sensor board with one or more sensors and a shutter that is coupled to and rotates with the shaft of the rotor. The shutter includes a plurality of shutter teeth that pass through optical sensors as the rotor rotates.
Because rotor position information is critical to proper operation of the switched reluctance electric machine, sophisticated alignment techniques are used to ensure that the sensor board of the RPT is properly positioned with respect to the housing and the stator. Misalignment of the sensor board is known to degrade the performance of the electric machine. Unfortunately, utilization of these complex alignment techniques increases the manufacturing costs for switched reluctance electric machines equipped with RPTs.
The RPTs also increase the overall size of the switched reluctance electric machine, which can adversely impact machine and product packaging requirements. The costs of the RPTs often place switched reluctance electric machines at a competitive disadvantage in applications that are suitable for open-loop induction electric machines that do not require RPTs.
Another drawback with RPTs involves field servicing of the switched reluctance electric machines. Specifically, wear elements, such as the bearings, that are located within the enclosed rotor housing may need to be repaired or replaced. To reach the wear elements, an end shield must be removed from the housing. Because alignment of the sensor board is important, replacement of the end shield often requires the use of complex realignment techniques. When the service technician improperly performs the alignment techniques, the sensor board is misaligned and the motor's performance is adversely impacted.
When sensing the angular rotor position using the “sensorless” approach, variations in the electrical characteristics of the individual stator pole windings can adversely impact the ability of the sensorless drive circuits to correctly derive the angular rotor position. Most of the sensorless approaches measure the resistance and/or inductance of the windings. If the resistance and/or inductance varies from one stator winding to another, the drive circuit may incorrectly determine the angular rotor position.
There are several conventional methods for placing the winding wire on the stator of a switched reluctance electric machine. The winding wire can be initially wound and transferred onto the stator poles. Transfer winding tends to leave excess winding wire or loops around axial ends of the stator poles. Transfer winding can typically utilize approximately 60-65% of available stator slot area. Needle winding employs a needle that winds the wire directly on the stator poles. The needle, however, takes up some of the stator slot area, which reduces slot fill to approximately 50%. The positioning of winding wire on the stator poles using these methods varies from one stator pole to the next. Winding creep and other assembly variations also impact the inductance and resistance of the winding wire over time, which makes it difficult to accurately perform “sensorless” control due to the non-conformity of the salient stator poles.
It is difficult to hold the winding wire in place during wrapping and forming of the windings. This is particularly true for salient stator poles of reluctance machines that typically have teeth with parallel sides that do not hold the winding wire very well. Tangs or circumferential projections have been used on the radially inner ends of the salient stator poles to provide a stop surface to retain the winding wire in place. The tangs limit a slot opening dimension between adjacent salient poles. As the size of the tangs increases, the ability of the tangs to retain the winding wire improves. However, as the size of the tangs increases and the slot opening dimension decreases, it becomes more difficult or impossible to employ the conventional needle and transfer winding methods. Widening of the tangs may also compromise performance. In addition to retaining the winding wire, there are other electrical reasons for widening the tangs, which would be precluded by these winding methods.
When using needle and transfer winding methods, the position of winding wire on the stator poles varies from one stator pole to the next and from one electric machine to the next. In other words, the individual winding turns are positioned differently and the cross sectional pattern of the stator pole windings is different. As a result, the inductance and resistance of the stator pole windings often vary from one stator pole to the next even though the same number of winding turns are used.
While the design of switched reluctance electric machines is relatively mature, there are several areas requiring improvement. Specifically, it is desirable to improve the torque density of switched reluctance electric machines. By increasing the torque density, the size of the switched reluctance electric machine can be reduced for a given torque output and/or the size can be maintained with an increase in torque output. Electrical machines achieving higher torque density will allow designers of products equipped with switched reluctance electrical machines greater flexibility in product design that may lead to increased sales through product differentiation and/or improved profit margins.
It is also desirable to eliminate the need for RPTs in switched reluctance electric machines. It is also desirable to assemble the stator of a switched reluctance electric machine in a highly uniform and repeatable manner to improve the performance of sensorless switched reluctance motors by reducing variations in the inductance and resistance of the stator.
A switched reluctance machine according to the invention includes a rotor and a segmented stator having a plurality of stator segment assemblies. The stator segment assemblies define salient stator poles and inter-polar stator slots. Each of the stator segment assemblies includes a stator segment core, an end cap assembly attached to opposite axial end surfaces of the stator segment core, and winding wire that is wound around the stator segment core and the end cap assembly. The rotor defines a plurality of rotor poles. The rotor tends to rotate relative to the stator to maximize the inductance of an energized winding. A drive circuit energizes the winding wire around the stator segment assemblies based on the rotational position of the rotor.
According to other features of the invention, each stator plate has an outer rim section and a tooth section. The end cap assembly includes a pair of end caps that are secured to opposite ends of the stator segment core, and a pair of retainer plates interconnecting the end caps on opposite sides of the stator segment core. The end cap assembly defines an annular retention channel within which the winding wire is wound. The retention channel facilitates improved precision in the winding process and tends to reduce winding creep during use.
By providing a segmented stator, the present invention improves the torque density of the switched reluctance electric machine. As a result, the torque output of the switched reluctance electric machine can be increased and/or the dimensions of the switched reluctance electric machine can be reduced for a given torque output. In addition, the stator segment assemblies can be manufactured with a greater uniformity and with lower variations in inductance and resistance. Sensorless rotor position sensing techniques can be employed to dramatically lower the manufacturing costs of the switched reluctance machine and to improve reliability in the field.
Other objects, features and advantages will be apparent from the specification, the claims and the drawings.
FIG 2C illustrates central portions that are deformed in a die punch operation and that are used to releasably engage adjacent stator plates;
The following detailed description provides preferred exemplary embodiments only and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability or configuration of the present invention. Rather, the detailed description of the preferred exemplary embodiments will provide those skilled in the art with an enabling description for implementing the preferred exemplary embodiments of the present invention. It will be understood that various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of the elements without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
Referring now to the drawings, a switched reluctance machine 10 is shown to include a housing 12, a segmented stator 14 mounted in the housing 12, and a rotor 16 supported for rotation relative to the segmented stator 14. In accordance with the present invention, the segmented stator 14 includes a plurality of stator segment assemblies 18 that can be individually assembled and then combined with additional stator segment assemblies to provide the segmented stator 14. As will be detailed, each stator segment assembly 18 includes a stator segment core 20, an end cap assembly 22 supporting the stator segment core 20, and winding wire 24 that is wound around the stator segment core 20 and the end cap assembly 22.
Referring to
As previously mentioned, the stator segment core 20 is defined by a plurality of stator plates 26 that are stacked together. The stator plates 26 are die cut from thin sheets of magnetically conductive material. During the die cutting operation, a first pair of slits 50 are cut into the outer rim section 28 and a second pair of slits 52 are cut into the pole section 30. The slits 50 are transverse in alignment relative to the slits 52. After stacking the stator plates 26 that form the stator segment core 20, a die punch operation is completed to deform a central portion 53 between the slits 50 and 52. As can be seen in
The rotor 16 is shown to include a circular rim section 54 and a plurality of tooth-shaped pole sections 56 that project radially from the rim section 54. A circular bore 58 is formed in the rotor 16 and includes keyways 60. The circular bore 58 of the rotor 16 receives a rotor shaft (not shown). In the particular embodiment shown, the rotor 16 has eight equally spaced rotor pole sections 56 and the segmented stator 14 has twelve equally spaced pole sections 30. Other rotor pole and stator pole combinations are also contemplated. In addition, each rotor pole section 56 has an arcuate outer edge surface 62 that defines an air gap 63 with respect to the arcuate inner edge surface 44 on the pole sections 30 of the stator plates 26.
Referring to
The tooth width W1 determines the magnetic flux density in the stator tooth and how much area is available for winding wire in the inter-polar stator slot. The designer of the switched reluctance electric machine can select the tooth width W1 so that it is sufficient to accommodate the maximum anticipated magnetic flux in the stator poles, but is not wider than necessary. By optimizing the tooth width W1, the slot area is increased, which allows additional winding wire. By increasing the current carrying capacity of the windings without causing overheating, the torque density of the switched reluctance electric machine can be improved. The design of the stator plates also depends on the type of steel that is selected, the axial length of the stator stack, and the desired magnetic flux density in the stator teeth.
Referring to
Referring to
To more clearly illustrate the structure of the end cap assembly 22,
Referring now to
As can be appreciated from the foregoing, the segmented stator for a switched reluctance electric machine according to the invention improves the torque density of the electric machine in part by increasing slot fill, by allowing the stator segment assemblies to be precisely wound (which improves heat exchange between the windings and the slot), and by providing a greater active length for a given overall length across end turns (due to shorten end turns).
The stator segment assemblies of the switched reluctance electric machine can be produced with a greater electrical uniformity and with lower variations in inductance and resistance. As a result, sensorless rotor position sensing techniques can be employed, which dramatically lowers the manufacturing costs of the switched reluctance machine and improves reliability in the field. Because the manufacturing tolerances of the stator have been improved, less costly drive circuits can be employed and/or more accurate control can be achieved. In addition, the end cap assemblies according to the invention prevent winding creep and further help to improve the electrical uniformity of the stator segment assemblies during use.
Those skilled in the art can now appreciate from the foregoing description that the broad teachings of the present invention can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this invention has been described in connection with particular examples thereof, the true scope of the invention should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent to the skilled practitioner upon a study of the drawings, the specification and the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1756672 | Barr | Apr 1930 | A |
2688103 | Sheldon | Aug 1954 | A |
2894157 | Morrill | Jul 1959 | A |
3604222 | Sandkrug et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3914859 | Pierson | Oct 1975 | A |
3979821 | Noodleman | Sep 1976 | A |
3987324 | Linkous | Oct 1976 | A |
4130770 | Wrobel | Dec 1978 | A |
4149309 | Mitsui | Apr 1979 | A |
4340829 | McCoy | Jul 1982 | A |
4350914 | Searle | Sep 1982 | A |
4418307 | Hoffmann et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4584495 | Kordik | Apr 1986 | A |
4635349 | Rabe | Jan 1987 | A |
4698542 | Muller | Oct 1987 | A |
4772839 | MacMinn et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4812695 | Parshall | Mar 1989 | A |
4819460 | Obradovic | Apr 1989 | A |
4845837 | Lloyd | Jul 1989 | A |
4883982 | Forbes et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4896089 | Kliman et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4922165 | Crawford et al. | May 1990 | A |
4950932 | Harms et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4953284 | Hammer et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4959596 | MacMinn et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4998052 | Erdman et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5034642 | Hoemann et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5076076 | Payne | Dec 1991 | A |
5161393 | Payne et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5173650 | Hedlund | Dec 1992 | A |
5194775 | Cooper | Mar 1993 | A |
5212419 | Fisher et al. | May 1993 | A |
5252902 | Uehara et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5256926 | Hagenlocher et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5257828 | Miller et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5301523 | Payne et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5325677 | Payne et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5327053 | Mann et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5410235 | Ehsani | Apr 1995 | A |
5457375 | Marcinkiewicz et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467025 | Ray | Nov 1995 | A |
5491859 | Richardson | Feb 1996 | A |
5563463 | Stark | Oct 1996 | A |
5578880 | Lyons et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5583387 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589751 | Lim | Dec 1996 | A |
5672925 | Lipo et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5691591 | McCann | Nov 1997 | A |
5701064 | Horst et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5720065 | Myers et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5729072 | Hirano et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740880 | Miller | Apr 1998 | A |
5743721 | Graham et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5763978 | Uchida et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5777416 | Kolomeitsev | Jul 1998 | A |
5783916 | Blackburn | Jul 1998 | A |
5786651 | Suzuki | Jul 1998 | A |
5793179 | Watkins | Aug 1998 | A |
5806169 | Trago et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5811905 | Tang | Sep 1998 | A |
5821661 | Wissmach et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5859518 | Vitunic | Jan 1999 | A |
5877568 | Maes et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883485 | Mehlhorn | Mar 1999 | A |
5923141 | McHugh | Jul 1999 | A |
5929590 | Tang | Jul 1999 | A |
5949211 | McCann | Sep 1999 | A |
5955861 | Jeong et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5979195 | Bestell et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982117 | Taylor et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990592 | Miura et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994804 | Grennan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996379 | Skrippek | Dec 1999 | A |
6011368 | Kalpathi et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020661 | Trago et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6040647 | Brown et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041625 | Nagai et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049153 | Nishiyama et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6066905 | Wright et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081083 | Nashiki | Jun 2000 | A |
6087755 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092619 | Nishikawa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6102151 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104113 | Beifus | Aug 2000 | A |
6107772 | Liu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122579 | Collier-Hallman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127753 | Yamazaki et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144131 | Hollenbeck et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6166468 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6177751 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188196 | Koide et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194805 | Heese et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194806 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204579 | Arpino | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211587 | Enomoto et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218753 | Asano et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219900 | Suzuki | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226856 | Kazama et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239530 | Garcia | May 2001 | B1 |
6252325 | Nashiki | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266591 | Wilson-Jones et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6300700 | Nishiyama et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6329782 | Chen et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6359412 | Heglund | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369481 | Bahn | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369687 | Akita et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373211 | Henry et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384564 | Pollock | May 2002 | B1 |
6389678 | Ackermann et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411006 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6487769 | Ketterer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
20010010452 | Moriarty | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010030517 | Batzel | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020089251 | Tajima et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2937838 | Sep 1979 | DE |
0350429 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0823711 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0778660 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0868010 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0871282 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0967135 | Dec 1999 | EP |
2719324 | Nov 1995 | FR |
1200279 | Jul 1970 | GB |
61030938 | Feb 1986 | JP |
404049826 | Feb 1992 | JP |
05-038086 | Feb 1993 | JP |
08-033292 | Feb 1996 | JP |
09084282 | Mar 1997 | JP |
09-233742 | Sep 1997 | JP |
09-322439 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-174319 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-210721 | Jul 1998 | JP |
10-271718 | Oct 1998 | JP |
11-018331 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11-089129 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-191987 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11-275830 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11-289701 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11-289726 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11-289727 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11-289728 | Oct 1999 | JP |
411289701 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11-332138 | Nov 1999 | JP |
11-341717 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000-014057 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000-37050 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-139052 | May 2000 | JP |
2000-224790 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-312451 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2000-333388 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-008395 | Jan 2001 | JP |
1354338 | Nov 1987 | RU |
WO 0037731 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0079670 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0195459 | Dec 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020125782 A1 | Sep 2002 | US |