This invention relates generally to thermal barrier coatings and in particular to a strain tolerant thermal barrier coating for a gas turbine component and a method of manufacturing the same.
It is known that the efficiency of a combustion turbine engine will improve as the firing temperature of the combustion gas is increased. As the firing temperatures increase, the high temperature durability of the components of the turbine must increase correspondingly. Although nickel and cobalt based superalloy materials are now used for components in the hot gas flow path, such as combustor transition pieces and turbine rotating and stationary blades, even these superalloy materials are not capable of surviving long term operation at temperatures sometimes exceeding 1,400 degrees C. In many applications a metal substrate is coated with a ceramic insulating material in order to reduce the service temperature of the underlying metal and to reduce the magnitude of the temperature transients to which the metal is exposed.
Thermal barrier coating (TBC) systems are designed to maximize their adherence to the underlying substrate material and to resist failure when subjected to thermal cycling. The temperature transient that exists across the thickness of a ceramic coating results in differential thermal expansion between the top and bottom portions of the coating. Such differential thermal expansion creates stresses within the coating that can result in the spalling of the coating along one or more planes parallel to the substrate surface. It is known that a more porous coating will generally result in lower stresses than dense coatings. Porous coatings also tend to have improved insulating properties when compared to dense coatings. However, porous coatings will densify during long term operation at high temperature due to diffusion within the ceramic matrix, with such densification being more pronounced in the top (hotter) layer of the coating than in the bottom (cooler) layer proximate the substrate. This difference in densification also creates stresses within the coating that may result in spalling of the coating.
A current state-of-the-art thermal barrier coating is yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) deposited by electron beam physical vapor deposition (EB-PVD). The EB-PVD process provides the YSZ coating with a columnar microstructure having sub-micron sized gaps between adjacent columns of YSZ material, as shown for example in U.S. Pat. No. 5,562,998. The gaps between columns of such coatings provide an improved strain tolerance and resistance to thermal shock damage. Alternatively, the YSZ may be applied by an air plasma spray (APS) process. The cost of applying a coating with an APS process is generally less than one half the cost of using an EB-PVD process. However, it is extremely difficult to form a desirable columnar grain structure with the APS process.
It is known to produce a thermal barrier coating having a surface segmentation to improve the thermal shock properties of the coating. U.S. Pat. No. 4,377,371 discloses a ceramic seal device having benign cracks deliberately introduced into a plasma-sprayed ceramic layer. A continuous wave CO2 laser is used to melt a top layer of the ceramic coating. When the melted layer cools and re-solidifies, a plurality of benign micro-cracks are formed in the surface of the coating as a result of shrinkage during the solidification of the molten regions. The thickness of the melted/re-solidified layer is only about 0.005 inch and the benign cracks have a depth of only a few mils. Accordingly, for applications where the operating temperature will extend damaging temperature transients into the coating to a depth greater than a few mils, this technique offers little benefit.
Special control of the deposition process can provide vertical micro-cracks in a layer of TBC material, as taught by U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,743,013 and 5,780,171. Such special deposition parameters may place undesirable limitations upon the fabrication process for a particular application.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,457,948 teaches that a TBC may be made more strain tolerant by a post-deposition heat treatment/quenching process which will form a fine network of cracks in the coating. This type of process is generally used to treat a complete component and would not be useful in applications where such cracks are desired on only a portion of a component or where the extent of the cracking needs to be varied in different portions of the component.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,558,922 describes a thick thermal barrier coating having grooves formed therein for enhance strain tolerance. The grooves are formed by a liquid jet technique. Such grooves have a width of about 100-500 microns. While such grooves provide improved stress/strain relief under high temperature conditions, they are not suitable for use on airfoil portions of a turbine engine due to the aerodynamic disturbance caused by the flow of the hot combustion gas over such wide grooves. In addition, the grooves go all the way to the bond coat and this can result in its oxidation and consequently lead to premature failure.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,352,540 describes the use of a laser to machine an array of discontinuous grooves into the outer surface of a solid lubricant surface layer, such as zinc oxide, to make the lubricant coating strain tolerant. The grooves are formed by using a carbon dioxide laser and have a surface opening size of 0.005 inch, tapering smaller as they extend inward to a depth of about 0.030 inches. Such grooves would not be useful in an airfoil environment, and moreover, the high aspect ratio of depth-to-surface width could result in an undesirable stress concentration at the tip of the groove in high stress applications.
It is known to use laser energy to cut depressions in a ceramic or metallic coating to form a wear resistant abrasive surface. Such a process is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,884,820 for forming an improved rotary gas seal surface. A laser is used to melt pits in the surface of the coating, with the edges of the pits forming a hard, sharp surface that is able to abrade an opposed wear surface. Such a surface would be very undesirable for an airfoil surface. Similarly, a seal surface is textured by laser cutting in U.S. Pat. No. 5,951,892. The surface produced with this process is also unsuitable for an airfoil application. These patents are concerned with material wear properties of a wear surface, and as such, do not describe processes that would be useful for producing a TBC having improved thermal endurance properties.
The features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when read with the accompanying drawings in which:
Next, a layer of insulating material such as a ceramic thermal barrier coating 18 is applied over the bond coat 16 or directly onto the substrate surface 14. The thermal barrier coating (TBC) may be a yttria-stabilized zirconia, which includes zirconium oxide ZrO2 with a predetermined concentration of yttrium oxide Y2O3, pyrochlores, perovskites, mixed oxides of pyrochlores, perovskites or other TBC material known in the art. The TBC may be applied using the less expensive air plasma spray technique, although other known deposition processes may be used. The thermal barrier coating 18 may be formed of the same material throughout its depth in one embodiment. In another embodiment, as illustrated in
The top layer 22 may be formed of a material with a lower thermal conductivity (low K) than the bottom layer 20. For example, the bottom layer 20 may be formed of yttria-stabilized zirconia, and the top layer 22 may be formed of a different ceramic material with an anisotropic crystal lattice structure, such as found in a monazite, pyrochlore, tungsten bronze, perovskite, or garnet structure. A tungsten bronze structure is described in co-pending application Ser. No. 12/101,460 filed Apr. 11, 2008 by the present assignee. Such a low-K top layer 22 thermally protects the bottom TBC layer 20. The bottom TBC layer 20 provides maximum adherence to the bond coat 16. The grooves 28 may range in depth from at least 50% of an average depth of the top layer 22 up to about 90% of the average total depth of the TBC 18, not including the bond coat 16. A groove depth approximately equal to the depth of the outer TBC layer 22 is an option that helps form a preferred failure plane at the interface between layers 20 and 22. Various depths are shown in
The dense top layer 22 will have a relatively lower thermal strain tolerance due to its lower pore content. For the very high temperatures of some modern combustion turbine engines, there may be an unacceptable level of interlaminar stress generated in the top layer 22 in its as-deposited condition due to the temperature gradient across the thickness (depth) of that layer. Accordingly, the top layer 22 is segmented to provide additional strain relief in that layer, as illustrated in
Known finite element analysis modeling techniques may be used to select an appropriate segmentation strategy.
Laser energy is preferred for engraving the gaps 28 after the thermal barrier coating 18 is deposited. The laser energy is directed toward the TBC top surface 30 in order to heat the material in a localized area to a temperature sufficient to cause vaporization and removal of material to a desired depth. The edges of the TBC material bounding the gaps 28 will exhibit a small re-cast surface where material had been heated to just below the temperature necessary for vaporization. The geometry of the walls defining gaps 28 may be controlled by controlling the laser engraving parameters. For turbine airfoil applications, the width of the gap at the surface 30 of the thermal barrier coating 18 may be maintained to be no more than 50 microns, or no more than 25 microns, or less than 125 microns, less than 100 microns, or less than 75 microns. Various embodiments may have a gap width at the surface 30 of between 25-125 microns (i.e. greater than 25 micron and less than 125 micron), between 25-100 microns, between 25-75 micron between 25-50 micron, between 50-100 micron, between 50-75 micron, between 75-125 microns, or between 75-100 microns, for example. Such gap sizes are selected to provide the desired mechanical strain relief while having a minimal impact on aerodynamic efficiency. Wider or more narrow gap widths may be selected for particular portions of a component surface, depending upon the sensitivity of the aerodynamic design and the predicted thermal conditions. The laser engraving process provides flexibility for the component designer in selecting the segmentation strategy most appropriate for any particular area of a component. In higher temperature areas the gap opening width may be made larger than in lower temperature areas. A component may be designed and manufactured to have a different gap width and/or spacing (S) in different sections of the same component.
Furthermore, a bond inhibiting material, such as alumina or yttrium aluminum oxide, may be disposed within the gaps on the gap sidewalls in order to reduce the possibility of the permanent closure of the gaps by sintering during long-term high temperature operation.
The inventors have found that a YAG laser may be used for engraving the gaps of the subject invention. A YAG laser has a wavelength of about 1.6 microns and will therefore serve as a finer cutting instrument than would a carbon dioxide laser that has a wavelength of about 10.1 microns. A power level of about 20-200 watts and a beam travel speed of between 5-600 mm/sec have been found to be useful for cutting a typical ceramic thermal barrier coating material. The laser energy is focused on the surface of the coating material using a lens having a focal distance of about 25-240 mm. In one embodiment, a lens having a focal distance of 56 mm was used. In order to reduce the accumulation of molten material splashed onto the lens during the laser engraving process, a lens having a focal distance of at least 160 mm may be used. Typically 2-12 passes across the surface may be used to form the desired depth of continuous gap.
It may be beneficial to change one or more parameters of the energy used to create the gap between sequential applications of energy to the insulation material. The geometry of the gap thus formed may be affected by such a change in energy parameter(s). The inventors have found that a generally U-shaped bottom geometry may be formed in the gap by making a second pass with the laser over an existing laser-cut gap, wherein the second pass is made with a wider beam footprint than was used for the first pass in order to reshape the walls defining the gap. The wider beam footprint may be accomplished by simply moving the laser farther away from the ceramic surface or by using a lens with a longer focal distance. In this manner the energy from the second pass exposure will tend to penetrate less deeply into the ceramic but will heat and evaporate a wider swath of material near the bottom of the gap, thus forming a generally U-shaped bottom geometry rather than a generally V-shaped bottom geometry as may be formed with a first pass. This process is illustrated in
The bottom geometry of the gap 44 may also be affected by the rate of pulsation of the laser beam 52. It is known that laser energy may be delivered as a continuous beam or as a pulsed beam. The rate of the pulsations may be any desired frequency, for example from 1-20 kHz. Note that this frequency should not be confused with the frequency of the laser light itself. For a given power level, a slower frequency of pulsations will tend to cut deeper into the ceramic material 46 than would the same amount of energy delivered with a faster frequency of pulsations. Accordingly, the rate of pulsations is a variable that may be controlled to affect the shape of the bottom geometry of the gap 44. In one embodiment, the inventors envision a first pass of the laser energy 48 having a first frequency of pulsations being used to cut the gap 44. Gap 44 after this pass of laser energy may have a generally V-shaped bottom geometry 50. A second pass of laser energy 52 having a second frequency of pulsations greater than the first frequency of pulsations is used to widen the bottom of gap 44 into a generally U-shaped bottom geometry 54. The dashed line in
The laser energy may be delivered to the ceramic material 46 through a fiber optic cable. A fiber optic cable may be particularly useful in applications where access to the ceramic material surface 56 is limited. One or more lens could be used downstream and/or upstream of the fiber optic cable to enhance the power density and/or the focus of the energy.
When gap 44 is formed in the ceramic material 46 by a laser engraving process or other heat-inducing process, a portion of the molten material generated by the laser energy is splashed onto the top surface 56 of the ceramic material proximate the gap 44 to form a ridge 60 on opposed sides of the gap 44. The ridge 60 may have a height above the original plane of the top surface 56 of about 10-50 microns for example. Ridge 60 would cause a perturbation and downstream wake in an airflow passing over the ceramic thermal barrier coating material 46. Accordingly, in prior art laser drilling operations where laser energy has been used to drill cooling fluid passages through a ceramic coating, such ridges 60 have been removed, such as by polishing, prior to use of the component in an airfoil application such as a gas turbine blade. The present inventors have realized that laser engraved gap 44 may be used in an air stream application in its as-formed state including ridge 60 provided that the axis of the gap 44 (i.e. its longitudinal length along the gap perpendicular to the paper as viewed in
The laser engraved gaps 44 can be formed to have a shape that is generally perpendicular to the top surface 56 of the ceramic material 46; i.e. a depth dimension line drawn from the center of the top of the gap to the center of the bottom of the gap would be perpendicular to the plane of the surface 56. This may be accomplished by keeping the laser beam 52 perpendicular to the surface 56 as it is moved in any direction. Alternatively, if the laser beam 52 is disposed at an oblique angle to the surface 56, the beam 52 can be moved parallel to the direction of the oblique angle along the laser line of sight so that the resulting gap 44 still remains perpendicular to the surface 56. The depth of the gap 44 may be less than 100% of the depth of the coating to avoid penetrating an underlying bond coat, and it may be at least 50% of the thickness of the ceramic coating, or between 50-67% of the depth of the coating. Such partial depth gaps 44 not only relieve stress in the coating, but they also serve as crack terminators for a crack developing between the bond coat and the ceramic thermal barrier coating. This aspect is illustrated in
One embodiment of the present invention utilizes a Model RS100D YAG laser producing a pulsed laser light with a repetition rate of 20 KHz with a power of 15 watts delivered with a 110 nanosecond pulse duration and 4.9 mJ/pulse. Two to six passes of laser energy are made over the surface of a ceramic thermal barrier coating through a 160 mm lens at a distance above the surface of approximately 150-175 mm to produce a 75-100 micron wide groove extending 50-67% of the coating depth. Additional parallel grooves may be produced by repeating this process at a spacing of 500 microns away from the first groove.
It is also possible to utilize a “seed” material at the critical depth to change the interface properties between layers and to ensure that failure propagation remains at the interface of the layers. For a zirconia coating, the seed material may be organic, including carbon, graphite, or polymer for example, or it may be inorganic, including alumina, hafnia or other high temperature oxide material having a thermal expansion characteristic or geometric or other property different than the zirconia to enhance crack propagation within the failure plane.
While the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions will occur to those of skill in the art without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/649,536 filed Aug. 26, 2003 now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/921,206 filed Aug. 2, 2001, now patent U.S. Pat. No. 6,703,137 issued Mar. 9, 2004. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/101,460 filed Apr. 11, 2008 now abandoned. These parent applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
T967009 | Gale | Feb 1978 | I4 |
4299860 | Schaefer et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4377371 | Wisander et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4405659 | Strangman | Sep 1983 | A |
4457948 | Ruckle et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4537793 | Kehrer et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4684780 | Cantello et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4884820 | Jackson et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4988538 | Horvei et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5073433 | Taylor | Dec 1991 | A |
5350599 | Rigney et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5352540 | Schienle et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5409741 | Laude | Apr 1995 | A |
5426092 | Ovshinsky et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5441283 | Pecht et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5558922 | Gupta et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562998 | Strangman | Oct 1996 | A |
5576069 | Chen et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5595791 | Baumgart et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5652044 | Rickerby | Jul 1997 | A |
5681616 | Gupta et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683825 | Bruce et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5705231 | Nissley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5743013 | Taylor et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5780171 | Nissley et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5830586 | Gray et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5951892 | Wolfla et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5993976 | Sahoo et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6034348 | Kim et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047539 | Farmer | Apr 2000 | A |
6057047 | Maloney | May 2000 | A |
6102656 | Nissley et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110604 | Rickerby | Aug 2000 | A |
6224963 | Strangman | May 2001 | B1 |
6261643 | Hasz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6316078 | Smialek | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6443813 | Strom et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6445963 | Blevins et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6676878 | O'Brien et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6703137 | Subramanian | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6846574 | Subramanian | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6939603 | Oechsner | Sep 2005 | B2 |
20010037823 | Middelman et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020110698 | Singh | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020172837 | Allen et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030101587 | Rigney et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030209859 | Young et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040266615 | Watson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070036997 | Floyd et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0916744 | May 1999 | EP |
1283278 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1734148 | Dec 2006 | EP |
2001144339 | May 2001 | JP |
1719756 | Mar 1992 | SU |
2007005832 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007116547 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2008140479 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cao et al., “New double-ceramic layer thermal barrier coatings based on zirconia-rare earth composite oxides”, Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 26, 2006, pp. 247-251. |
Haddadi, A. et al Cystalline Growth within Alumina and Zirconia Coatings with Coating Temperature Control during Spraying. Thermal Spray: Practical Solutions for Engineering Problems. C.C. Berndt (ed.). Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 1996, pp. 615-622. |
Nerz, John E. Taguchi Analysis of Thick Thermal Barrier Coatings. Thermal Spray Research and Applications, Proceedings of the 3rd National Thermal Spray Conference, Long Beach, CA, May 1990, pp. 669-673. |
Johner, G. et al. Experimental and Theoretical Aspects of Thick Thermal Barrier Coatings for Turbine Applications. Proceedings of the National Thermal Spray Conference, Orlando, FL, 1987. Ed. D.L. Houck, 1987, pp. 155-166. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090017260 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12101460 | Apr 2008 | US |
Child | 12238939 | US | |
Parent | 10649536 | Aug 2003 | US |
Child | 12101460 | US | |
Parent | 09921206 | Aug 2001 | US |
Child | 10649536 | US |