1. Field of the Invention
Implementations of various technologies described herein generally relate to correcting seismograms from absorption effects of seismic waves in the earth.
2. Description of the Related Art
The following descriptions and examples do not constitute an admission as prior art by virtue of their inclusion within this section.
As seismic waves travel through the earth, some of the energy stored in the seismic waves may be lost due to absorption or dissipative effects, i.e., the energy may be dissipated into heat. As a result, some of the valuable information carried by the seismic waves may be lost.
A common technique used to correct seismograms to compensate for the absorption effects is Q-filtering, which is described in Q-Adaptive Deconvolution, by D. Hale, Stanford Exploration Project, Report 30, 1982. Hale discloses two iterative procedures for implementing inverse Q-filtering. However, the procedures disclosed by Hale make several assumptions that cause Hale to arrive at an approximate dispersion relationship. Use of the approximate dispersion relationship, in turn, degrades the value of the Q compensation obtained by Hale.
Described herein are implementations of various techniques directed to a method for correcting seismograms to compensate for absorption effects that occur in the earth. In one implementation, the method may include computing a ratio of traveltime to absorption parameter for each seismogram to generate a system of linear equations. The ratio is expressed as a linear equation having a plurality of components. The method may further include solving the system of linear equations for the plurality of components, adding one or more of the solved components to generate an estimate of the ratio of traveltime to absorption parameter, and correcting the seismograms using the estimate of the ratio of traveltime to absorption parameter.
The above referenced summary section is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the detailed description section. The summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter. Furthermore, the claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any or all disadvantages noted in any part of this disclosure.
Implementations of various technologies will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be understood, however, that the accompanying drawings illustrate only the various implementations described herein and are not meant to limit the scope of various technologies described herein.
The discussion below is directed to certain specific implementations. It is to be understood that the discussion below is only for the purpose of enabling a person with ordinary skill in the art to make and use any subject matter defined now or later by the patent “claims” found in any issued patent herein.
The following paragraphs generally describe one or more implementations of various techniques directed for correcting seismograms to compensate for absorption or dissipative effects that occur in the earth. In one implementation, a ratio of traveltime (t) to absorption parameter (Q) may be computed for each seismogram. The ratio may be referred to as R. Further, the ratio may be computed for a predetermined set of traveltimes. As a result, a system of linear equations may be generated, where each ratio is represented by a linear equation having a number of unknown components.
The system of linear equations may then be solved for the unknown components. The solved components may then be recombined or added to generate an estimate of R. In one implementation, only a portion of the solved components may be added. The seismograms may then be corrected using the estimate of R. As such, the seismograms may be corrected for absorption effects in a surface consistent manner. In one implementation, various techniques described herein may be used prior to digital group forming.
One or more techniques for correcting seismograms to compensate for absorption or dissipative effects that occur in the earth in accordance with various implementations will now be described in more detail with reference to
However, as seismic waves travel through various subterranean formations, a portion of the amplitude of the seismic waves may dissipate into heat absorbed by the subterranean formations. As a result, some of the valuable information carried by the seismic waves may be lost. Accordingly, implementations of various techniques described herein are directed to a method for compensating for the loss of amplitude of the seismic waves due to absorption or dissipative effects that occur at the subterranean formations.
In one implementation, seismic data may be corrected using Q-filtering techniques. Q represents absorption parameter and may often be referred to as the seismic quality factor. Q may also be a function of traveltime t and as such be referred to as Q(t). Q-filtering may be interpreted as the application of time-invariant filters having an amplitude correction filter expressed as AR(f)=exp(sgnπfR) and a phase correction filter expressed as
where R=t/Q, f represents the frequency of the input seismogram in the frequency domain, fc represents the cutoff frequency of the input seismogram, sgn=−1 when the filters are used for modeling absorption and sgn=1 when the filters are used for compensation, i.e., inverse Q-filtering.
The amplitude correction filter may be decomposed surface consistently, i.e., the absorption correction filter may be expressed as a multiplication of a number of components. For instance, in one implementation, the absorption correction filter AR(f) may be expressed as follows:
AR(f)=AR
where Ra represents a multiplicative average absorption effect, Rs represents residual absorption effects attributed to the sources, Rr represents residual absorption effects attributed to the receivers, Ro represents residual absorption effects attributed to offsets between receivers and the sources and Ri represents residual absorption effects attributed to common mid point of the seismograms. Although the absorption filter AR(f) is illustrated as being decomposed into five components, it should be understood that the absorption filter AR(f) may be decomposed into less than five components or more than five components. For instance, the absorption filter AR(f) may be decomposed into azimuthal variations in addition to the five components mentioned above.
An application of a natural logarithm to AR(f)=exp(sgnπfR) would yield
ln(AR(f))=sgnπfR Equation (2).
An application of a natural logarithm to the right hand side of equation (1)
would yield ln(AR(f))=sgnπfRa+sgnπfRs+sgnπfRr+sgnπfRo+sgnπfRi Equation (3).
Substituting ln(AR(f)) with sgnπfR would yield a linear equation as expressed below:
sgnπfR=sgnπfRa+sgnπfRs+sgnπfRr+sgnπfRo+sgnπfRi Equation (4).
Dividing equation (4) with sgnπf would yield a linear equation as expressed below:
R(t)=Ra(t)+Rs(t)+Rr(t)+Ro(t)+Ri(t)+N(t) Equation (5),
where N(t) represents noise, i.e., the non-surface consistent portion of the seismograms. Hence, removing N(t) would yield to an estimate of R(t), which may be expressed as linear equation
{circumflex over (R)}(t)=Ra(t)+Rs(t)+Rr(t)+Ro(t)+Ri(t) Equation (6).
where n represents predetermined instances of traveltimes.
X(t,f)=A(t,f)W(f)I(f) Equation (7),
where A(t, f) represents a time variant exponential absorption term, W(f) represents a time invariant source wavelet, and I(f) represents a time-invariant reflectivity. The time variant exponential absorption term A(t, f) may be expressed as:
A(t,f)=exp(−πfR(t)) Equation (8),
where
At step 330, the natural logarithm of the time variant amplitude spectrum of the input seismogram X(t, f) may be calculated and the result may be divided by −πf. Step 330 may be expressed as:
At step 340, a least squares power series approximation to S(t, f) may be performed to generate a plurality of power series coefficients si, i.e., s0, s1, s2, . . . sn. The least squares estimate to the power series coefficients may be computed by solving the following minimization problem:
In one implementation, the least squares powers series is of a low order, i.e., n is a small number, e.g., from about 2 to about 8.
S(t, f) may also be expressed as: S(t,f)=R(t)+c(f) where c(f) represents an unknown frequency dependent constant. At step 350, the unknown frequency dependent constant c(f) may be set to be equal to the first power series coefficient s0. At step 360, a power series approximation to R(t) may be determined by performing a power series approximation to S(t, f) with the index starting from 1, as opposed to 0, i.e., without using the first power series coefficient s0. The power series approximation to R(t) may be expressed as:
In this manner, the ratio R (t) may be approximated by the power series approximation.
As such, at the end of step 210, a linear equation {circumflex over (R)}(t)=Ra(t)+Rs(t)+Rr(t)+Ro(t)+Ri(t) may be generated for each seismogram for predetermined instances of traveltimes. At step 220, a system of linear equations for all the seismograms may be solved for Ra(t), Rs(t), Rr(t), Ro(t) and Ri(t). As mentioned above, Ra represents a multiplicative average absorption effect, Rs represents residual absorption effects attributed to the sources, Rr represents residual absorption effects attributed to the receivers, Ro represents residual absorption effects attributed to offsets between receivers and the sources and Ri represents residual absorption effects attributed to common mid point of the seismograms. Although the system of linear equations is discussed with reference to solving five components, it should be understood that is some implementations the system of linear equations may be solved for more or less components.
At step 230, one or more of the solved components may be summed or recombined to generate an estimate of R(tn). Again, all or only a portion of the solved components may be summed or recombined.
At step 240, the seismograms may be corrected using the estimate of R(tn) computed in step 230. In one implementation, each seismogram may be corrected using its own estimate of R(tn). In another implementation, each seismogram may be corrected using a number of estimates of R(tn) based on the number of instances of traveltimes.
At step 420, a sampling interval along the R axis, ΔR, is calculated according to
where fmax represents an estimate of the maximum frequency in the input seismic trace. For example, the sampling interval along the R axis may be about 0.043 seconds for a maximum frequency of about 100 Hz.
At step 430, a plurality of R values may be determined using t, Q(t) and the sampling interval ΔR. In one implementation, n+1 R values may be determined, where
At step 440, the input seismogram may be filtered using an amplitude correction filter AR(f)=exp(sgnπfR), a phase correction filter
and the R values generated at step 430. In one implementation, the input seismogram may be filtered by first applying an inverse Fourier transform to the amplitude and phase correction filters for all R values (step 442). In this manner, the amplitude and phase correction filters may be transformed to the time domain. At step 444, the result of step 442 may be convolved with the input seismogram to generate the n+1 filtered input seismograms in the time domain, which make up the t by Q gather. The input seismogram may also be filtered with other types of convolution filters commonly known by persons with ordinary skill in the art. At step 450, an interpolation algorithm may be applied to the t by Q gather along the R(t) curve to derive a corrected input seismogram. The interpolation algorithm may be a linear interpolation or any other interpolation algorithm commonly known by those skilled in the art. The application of the interpolation algorithm may also be known as “slicing through” the t by Q gather along the R(t) curve. Steps 410 through 450 may be repeated for other input seismograms.
The system computer 630 may be in communication with disk storage devices 629, 631, and 633, which may be external hard disk storage devices. It is contemplated that disk storage devices 629, 631, and 633 are conventional hard disk drives, and as such, will be implemented by way of a local area network or by remote access. Of course, while disk storage devices 629, 631, and 633 are illustrated as separate devices, a single disk storage device may be used to store any and all of the program instructions, measurement data, and results as desired.
In one implementation, seismic data from the receivers may be stored in disk storage device 631. The system computer 630 may retrieve the appropriate data from the disk storage device 631 to process seismic data according to program instructions that correspond to implementations of various technologies described herein. The program instructions may be written in a computer programming language, such as C++, Java and the like. The program instructions may be stored in a computer-readable medium, such as program disk storage device 633. Such computer-readable media may include computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media may include volatile and non-volatile, and removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media may further include RAM, ROM, erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other solid state memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD), or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the system computer 630. Communication media may embody computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal, such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and may include any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” may mean a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media may include wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared and other wireless media. Combinations of any of the above may also be included within the scope of computer readable media.
In one implementation, the system computer 630 may present output primarily onto graphics display 627, or alternatively via printer 628. The system computer 630 may store the results of the methods described above on disk storage 629, for later use and further analysis. The keyboard 626 and the pointing device (e.g., a mouse, trackball, or the like) 625 may be provided with the system computer 630 to enable interactive operation.
The system computer 630 may be located at a data center remote from the survey region. The system computer 630 may be in communication with the receivers (either directly or via a recording unit, not shown), to receive signals indicative of the reflected seismic energy. These signals, after conventional formatting and other initial processing, may be stored by the system computer 630 as digital data in the disk storage 631 for subsequent retrieval and processing in the manner described above. While
While the foregoing is directed to implementations of various technologies described herein, other and further implementations may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, which may be determined by the claims that follow. Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4449208 | Moeckel et al. | May 1984 | A |
4706226 | Houghtaling | Nov 1987 | A |
4884247 | Hadidi et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5555218 | Chambers et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
7382683 | Ferber et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
20060265132 | Rickett | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 809 122 | Nov 1997 | EP |
WO 02065372 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO2006025823 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO2006025824 | Mar 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080306693 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |