Various wireless access technologies have been proposed or implemented to enable mobile stations to perform communications with other mobile stations or with wired terminals coupled to wired networks. Examples of wireless access technologies include GSM (Global System for Mobile communications) and UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunications System) technologies, defined by the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP); and CDMA 2000 (Code Division Multiple Access 2000) technologies, defined by 3GPP2. CDMA 2000 defines one type of packet-switched wireless access network, referred to as the HRPD (High Rate Packet Data) wireless access network.
Another more recent standard that provides packet-switched wireless access networks is the Long Term Evolution (LTE) standard from 3GPP, which seeks to enhance the UMTS technology. The LTE standard is also referred to as the EUTRA (Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access) standard. The EUTRA technology is considered to be fourth generation (4G) technology, to which wireless network operators are migrating to provide enhanced services.
In general, according to some embodiments, a wireless receiver receives reference signals over a wireless link. The wireless receiver calculates a selection indication based on the received reference signals, and the wireless receiver selects from among plural channel estimation techniques based on the selection indication, where the selected channel estimation technique is usable to perform channel estimation of the wireless link. In one embodiment, calculation of the selection indication is based on determining a quantity reflecting a difference between the reference signals. In one embodiment, the quantity is based on an aggregation of channel frequency responses at plural frequencies. In one embodiment, the quantity is based on an aggregation of channel frequency responses and corresponding samples at the plural frequencies.
Other or alternative features will become apparent from the following description, from the drawings, and from the claims.
Some embodiments are described with respect to the following figures:
Channel estimation of a wireless link is used to determine a channel response of a wireless link to allow for removal or reduction of interference effects in the wireless link. Accurate channel estimation allows for improved performance in wireless communications in a wireless communications network, such as in the form of higher data rates and/or reduced errors caused by interference.
Multiple channel estimation techniques may be available to perform channel estimation. However, different channel estimation techniques may not be optimal under different conditions. For example, one type of channel estimation technique is based on use of a time-domain averaging algorithm, which works well when a mobile station is moving relatively slowly, but can underperform in high-velocity situations. Another type of channel estimation technique involves use of a time-domain linear interpolation algorithm, which performs well in high-velocity conditions (when the mobile station is moving at a relatively high velocity), but underperforms in low-velocity conditions and in high-noise conditions.
In accordance with some embodiments, techniques or mechanisms are provided to allow for real-time estimation of wireless link conditions so that real-time switching between different channel estimation techniques can be used. Real-time switching between different channel estimation techniques refers to the ability to determine channel conditions during a particular time interval, and to switch between different channel estimation techniques based on the determined channel conditions during that same time interval.
In accordance with some embodiments, the determination of channel conditions for the purpose of performing switching between channel estimation techniques is based on reference signals received over the wireless link. In some implementations, the reference signals are demodulation reference signals (DMRS), which are reference signals used to enable coherent signal demodulation at a wireless receiver. In some examples, the demodulation reference signals are associated with transmission of uplink data and/or control signaling (transmission of data and/or control signaling from the mobile station to the base station). The demodulation reference signals are time-multiplexed with uplink data. The demodulation reference signals assist in estimating channel responses for uplink data so as to effectively demodulate the uplink channel.
Although reference is made to demodulation reference signals in this discussion, it is noted that techniques or mechanisms according to some embodiments can be used with other uplink reference signals. More generally, a “reference signal” refers to a control signal that contains information to allow a wireless receiver to better process information received over a wireless link. Note also that although reference is made to uplink reference signals, in alternative implementations, other types of reference signals can be sent on the downlink (from the base station to the mobile station). Techniques or mechanisms according to some embodiments that allow for switching between different channel estimation techniques based on determined channel conditions can be applied to the uplink or downlink.
A base station can perform one or more of the following tasks: radio resource management, mobility management for managing mobility of mobile stations, routing of traffic, and so forth. Generally, the term “base station” can refer to a cellular network base station or access point used in any type of wireless network, or any type of wireless transmitter/receiver to communicate with mobile stations. The term “base station” can also encompass an associated controller, such as a base station controller or a radio network controller. It is contemplated that the term “base station” also refers to a femto base station or access point, a micro base station or access point, or a pico base station or access point. A “mobile station” can refer to a telephone handset, a portable computer, a personal digital assistant (PDA), or an embedded device such as a health monitor, attack alarm, and so forth.
As depicted in
The serving gateway 110 routes bearer data packets. The serving gateway 110 also acts as a mobility anchor for the user plane during handovers between different access networks. The serving gateway 110 is also connected to a packet data network (PDN) gateway 114 that provides connectivity between the mobile station 108 and the packet data network 116 (e.g., the Internet, a network that provides various service, etc.).
Reference to the EUTRA standard is intended to refer to the current EUTRA standard, as well as standards that evolve over time. It is expected that future standards evolve from EUTRA may be referred by different names. It is contemplated that reference to “EUTRA” is intended to cover such subsequently evolved standards as well.
Although reference is made to EUTRA, note that techniques or mechanisms according to some embodiments are applicable for systems employing other types of wireless protocols.
As further depicted in
To determine channel conditions for the purpose of switching between channel estimation techniques, channel information received in the two DMRS symbols 202 and 204 are exploited on a per-TTI basis. The channel information extracted from the DMRS symbols includes two-dimensional channel information in both the time domain and in the frequency domain. By using the two received DMRS symbols in each TTI (represented by the uplink subframe structure 200 of
On the other hand, if it is determined that Z has a second state (e.g., Z=0), then tasks 312 and 314 are performed, where task 312 involves frequency domain noise suppression, and task 314 involves selection of the averaging algorithm to perform channel estimation.
As depicted in
The frequency domain noise suppression performed at 308 or 312 in some examples can be based on frequency-domain moving averaging. Noise suppression is used to reduce noise to provide superior channel estimation results. As depicted in
The parameter Z is calculated as follows:
Z=sgn(F(dmrs1,dmrs2)−Delta), (Eq. 1)
where
sgn(x)=1 if x>0, or 0 if x<0, (Eq. 2)
and F(*) is a function of dmrs1 and dmrs2 (e.g., DMRS symbols 202 and 204, respectively, in
dmrs1={h10,h11, . . . ,h1M−1},
dmrs2={h20,h21, . . . ,h2M−1}, (Eq. 3)
and Delta is a design parameter determined from simulation or testing.
According to some examples, two DMRS symbols each can provide channel frequency response with noise added at a particular time instant in a subframe. The real relationship between channel frequency response and noise can be complicated but for analytical simplicity, one can assume that this relationship can be approximated by a summation of the channel frequency response at the ith subcarrier denoted as hi and the corresponding noise sample ni, i.e.,
dik=hik+nik i=0,1 . . . ,M; and k=a for DMRS1 or b for DMRS2,
where M is the number of used subcarriers and each quantity here is a complex number.
In the wireless environment, channel frequency response varies with time due to the mobility of a mobile station. Since there is a time offset between DMRS1 and DMRS2 in each subframe, this time variation can be reflected by the difference between two received DMRS symbols (such as depicted in
In some implementations, the mean of each DMRS sequence is chosen as the quantity to measure the status of each DMRS as a whole, and the status difference between two DMRS symbols is chosen as the quantity to measure the change of DMRS2 relative DMRS1 due to channel frequency response variation across the time period between two DMRS symbols. Therefore, according to some examples, the function, F(*), given previously can be expressed as:
It should be pointed out that the second items in Eqs. 4 and 5 reflect noise suppression effect due to averaging, resulting in noise power reduction from its original power and an improvement of mean estimate of each DMRS. The larger the value of M, the more accurate the estimation will be.
In the foregoing description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the subject disclosed herein. However, implementations may be practiced without some or all of these details. Other implementations may include modifications and variations from the details discussed above. It is intended that the appended claims cover such modifications and variations.
This application is a Submission Under 35 U.S.C. §371 for U.S. National Stage Patent Application of International Application Number: PCT/IB2010/002070, filed Jul. 15, 2010 entitled “SELECTING FROM AMONG PLURAL CHANNEL ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES,” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/225,665, filed Jul. 15, 2009, the entirety of both which are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2010/002070 | 7/15/2010 | WO | 00 | 1/12/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/007258 | 1/20/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7848434 | Wu et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8095076 | Aedudodla et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8130852 | Choi et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8675481 | Ko et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20010028637 | Abeta et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20070147533 | Thomas et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080049598 | Ma et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049814 | Jeon | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049818 | Taich et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080101306 | Bertrand et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080146231 | Huang et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080273641 | Yang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090207093 | Anreddy et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090245333 | Krishnamoorthi et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268803 | Merched et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100034174 | Nishikawa et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039970 | Papasakellariou et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100067464 | Higuchi | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100085925 | Kishiyama et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100130135 | Wang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100158176 | Luo et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100202554 | Kramer et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110096942 | Thyssen | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120008577 | Han et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120275499 | Anreddy et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140112296 | Ko et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101283559 | Oct 2008 | CN |
1924040 | May 2008 | EP |
2124369 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2139256 | Dec 2009 | EP |
8-265184 | Oct 1996 | JP |
2008124964 | May 2008 | JP |
2007102654 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2008087838 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008114724 | Sep 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 2, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/IB2010/002070, International Filing Date: Jul. 15, 2010 consisting of 10-pages. |
Office Action in Korean Application No. 10-2012-7002738 dated Apr. 23, 2014 (Korean and English Versions). |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2012-520122 dated Mar. 31, 2014 (Japanese and English Versions). |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201080040532.8 dated Jan. 15, 2014. |
Qualcomm Europe; “Further Considerations and Link Simulations on Reference Signals in LTE-A”; 3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 #56; R1-090875; Athens, Greece; Feb. 9-13, 2009; pp. 1-6. |
Lathaharan Somasegaran; “Channel Estimation and Prediction in UMTS LTE”; Aalborg University, Institute of Electronic Systems, Signal and Information Processing for Communications; Feb. 22-Jun. 25, 2007; pp. 1-49. |
Office Action in Russian Application No. 2012103504 dated Jul. 1, 2014 (Russian and English Versions). |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2012-520122 dated Sep. 12, 2014 (Japanese and English Versions). |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201080040532.8 dated Aug. 26, 2014 (Chinese and English Versions). |
Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2013; U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,737, filed Sep. 15, 2012; 18 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2013; U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,737, filed Sep. 15, 2012; 11 pages. |
Advisory Action dated Sep. 12, 2013; U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,737, filed Sep. 15, 2012; 3 pages. |
Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2014; U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,737, filed Sep. 15, 2012; 10 pages. |
Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2014; U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,737, filed Sep. 15, 2012; 22 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 22, 2014; U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,737, filed Sep. 15, 2012; 22 pages. |
Canadian Office Action; Application No. 2,768,150; Feb. 19, 2015; 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120115470 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61225665 | Jul 2009 | US |