The present invention relates to selecting or otherwise providing access to electronic content and services, such as but not limited to content and service provided by a cable television service provider.
Electronic content and services may be broadcasted or otherwise to users according to any number of protocols, standards, and formats, depending on any number of variables. Some of these parameters may provide better quality than the other formats, where quality may be defined in terms of transmission speeds, processing demands, viewing quality, size, or any number of other characteristics. The ability to access or otherwise support higher quality content may be dependent on capabilities of devices used to access the same.
For example, if content is carried in television signals, the ability of the devices to process certain television signals may determine when the users thereof are able to access higher quality content. Television signals may be broadcasted according to any number of standards (e.g., Moving Picture Expert Group (MPEG-3 or MPEG-4)) and formats (e.g., Standard Definition (SD) or High Definition (HD)). The ability of the devices to process the corresponding signals generally determines whether to access the various services is possible.
Some devices may be configured to process both several types of quality standards and/or formats, i.e., some devices may be able to process both SD and HD television signals. The ability of these devices may be advantageous if some content is broadcast at one quality and other content is broadcast at another quality, as it allows such devices to access both types of content. The ability of these devices to process both low and high quality content can be problematic if the content is broadcast in both SD and HD, which is common if the service provider is required to support SD only devices.
The problem generally relates to selecting lower quality signals when higher quality signals are available. For example, the users may select an SD television channel even though the same content is available on a supported HD television channel, which is problematic at least in so far as it is desirable that the customers desires to watch the highest quality content available. The present invention contemplates a solution wherein selection of (automatic in at least one embodiment) the higher quality content is provided or otherwise facilitated when the lower quality content is selected yet the higher quality content is available or otherwise supported.
The present invention is pointed out with particularity in the appended claims. However, other features of the present invention will become more apparent and the present invention will be best understood by referring to the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompany drawings in which:
The media provider 16, for exemplary purposes, is most prominently described with respect to being a television service provider having capabilities for providing television, telecommunications, and/or high-speed data services to subscriber locations, primarily through wireline and/or wireless communications. The present invention fully contemplates the provider 16 being associated with any type of television service provider, including, for example, cable, IP, broadcast, satellite, etc. and non-television providers, such as those associated with high-speed data, telecommunications, cellular communications, and the like.
The media provider 16 may be configured to support and/or facilitate the use of any number of television and non-television services and applications, such as, but not limited to email services, data transmission service, linear and non-linear television programming/signaling (cable, satellite, broadcast, etc.), Video on Demand (VOD), interactive television (iTV), interactive gaming, pay-per-view (PPV), digital video recording (local and remote), and/or broadcasting of signals associated with supporting television programming, movies, audio, and other multimedia, as well as, downloading of clips or full-length versions of the same.
The network 18 may include any number of features and devices to facilitate signal transportation and other operations associated with interfacing the subscriber locations with each other and otherwise supporting communications associated with services of the media provider 16. The network 18 may include terrestrial and celestial components and infrastructures, including cable lines, telephone lines, and/or satellite or other wireless architectures. The network may be associated with other private and/or public networks, such as the Internet and dedicated or virtual private networks.
The CPE 12, 14 may relate to any device, element, and/or other feature associated with interfacing users with various services associated with the media provider, such as but not limited to a settop box (STB), digital video recorder (DVR), personal computer (PC), television (which may include embedded user interface and processing capabilities), outlet digital adapter (ODA), media terminal adapter (MTA), cable modem (CM), personal digital assistant (PDA), mobile device (phone, computer, etc.), personal media device, and any other item having capabilities to supporting access to any number of the services.
The CPE 12, 14 may be configured to descramble and to support and/or facilitate the use of any number of television and non-television related signals, such as, but not limited to, Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP), Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP), Syslog, Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP), Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS), Domain Name Server (DNS) applications, DOCSIS Settop Gateway (DSG), out-of-band (OOB) messaging, and others.
Media may be associated with and/or controlled by the media provider 16 (which in turn may receive the content from other sources). The media may be sourced from the media provider directly, from one or more of the CPE 12, 14 connected to the network 18, by, but not limited to peer-to-peer environments, and/or from any other source in communication with the network 18 (internet, etc.). For example, if the media provider 16 is a television service provider, a portion of the media content may relate to television programs, movies, and other multimedia packets. The media content may be delivered to the subscriber locations directly from the media service provider 16 and/or from one or more of the other CPEs 12-14 in communication with the network 18.
Block 22 relates to the media service provider broadcasting or otherwise distributing media content through electronic communications. The media may be electronically communicated through any number of communication means and mechanisms, including but not limited to communications based upon a regional enterprise configured to broadcast the electronic media to a number of subscribers located in the corresponding region, i.e., a cable television headend configured for broadcasting standard definition (SD), high definition (HD), or otherwise formatted television signals.
Block 24 relates to receiving a request for accessing the broadcast media content such as but not limited to a request made by a user to a STB for tuning to television signals associated with the television channel having the desired content. The request may be determined through a user command made to the STB, such as but not limited to channel change commands issued from a remote control, and/or through some other interaction with the STB, such as but not limited to manipulation of a user interface (UI).
Block 36 relates to determining whether a higher quality version of the content requested in Block 24 is available. The higher quality version may relate to another broadcast of the same content having better transmission speeds, processing demands, viewing quality, size, or any number of other improved characteristics relative to the previously requested content. One non-limiting example of the present invention relates to initially requesting SD television channels and determining whether higher quality television channels are available, i.e., HD television channels. The determination of the higher quality content may be made according to or as a function of any number of operations.
The availability of additional or higher forms of the content may be selected by the user through interaction with the UI 30 illustrated in
From the smart selection window 38, the user may select one of the available formats, such as the indicated HD format. The UI 30 shown in
The channel map 42 may be configured to associate source IDs in the Source ID column 46 with various channels in the Channel column 44 that are available to the subscriber. When a channel change command is received, the STB may consult the channel map 42 to determine instructions or other information associated with tuning to or otherwise accessing the selected channel. The source ID column 46 may be used to provide instructions or other information associated with tuning to or otherwise accessing the desired content.
The channel map 42 may further include a smart selection portion 48 to facilitate determining whether higher quality versions of the requested content are available. The higher quality versions of the requested content may be determined from the smart selection portion 48 as a function of the channels selected in the channel column 44. The smart selection portion 48 may include an “Available” column 50 for listing available forms of the content and a second “Source ID” column 52 for locating or otherwise accessing the additionally available content.
Some or all of the channels may include additional versions of the content and/or only a portion of the channels may not include additional versions, such as those indicated with “none”. While only one additional form of the content is shown to be available for those channels having additional content, i.e. HD, the present invention fully contemplates multiple forms of the content being available, besides HD
The channel map 42 may be downloaded or otherwise utilized with the STB. The STB may consult the channel map 42 to locate the requested content as a function of the channel associated therewith and the corresponding smart selection portion 48 to determine whether additional forms of the content are available. This may provide an automated process for determining the availability of additional forms of the content without requiring user interaction.
Returning to
Block 56 is reached if higher quality forms of the content are available. Block 56 relates to determining whether the higher quality forms are supported on the device requesting the content. The suitability of the higher quality forms may be determined as a function of user inputs or other configurations of the STB or device attempting the access the content. The user or a technician may input capabilities of the device through interaction with a UI and/or in any other manner. The suitability may also be automatically determined by the STB as a function of devices connected thereto, such as if a cable is connected to an HD enabled display, if the STB is connected to a HD tuner, etc.
Block 58 is reached if the higher quality content is available and supported on the STB or other device attempting to access the content. Block 58 relates to tuning to the higher quality content instead of the previously selected lower quality form. This includes the STB, for example, tuning to channel 255 (HD) instead of the selected lower quality channel 55 (SD). Of course, access to the higher quality content may include other operations.
A display or other feature on the STB may also be changed to reflect the higher quality content tuned to in Block 58. If channel 55 is selected, the STB will automatically display channel 255 (the corresponding higher quality channel). This may be helpful in educating the user to the higher quality channel number.
Alternatively, the STB display may not display the higher quality channel number and instead display the lower quality channel number, even though the higher quality form of the content is accessed. This may be helpful in preventing confusion or other misinterpretations by the user not understanding why the wrong channel number of showing for the requested content, while allowing the STB to tune to the higher quality form.
If higher quality content is available and the STB is unable to support the higher quality content, Block 60 may be reached. Block 60 relates to offering support for the higher quality content. This may include making an offer to the subscriber to purchase or otherwise upgrade their subscription in order to access the content. The UI or other feature may be used to communicate the offer. Block 62 relates to tuning to the lower quality content if the offer is denied and tuning to the higher quality content if the offer is accepted.
As described above, one non-limiting aspect of the present invention relates to automatically or with some user interaction facilitating access to higher quality content when a subscriber or device attempts to access lower quality content. The present invention is predominately described with respect to tuning an STB to higher quality television signals available on non-selected channels. The present invention, however, is not intended to be so limited and fully contemplates facilitating access to higher quality forms of any type of content and not just content carried over television signals.
One non-limiting aspect of the present invention relates to allowing providers to offer the higher quality forms of the content without requiring the subscribers to be previously aware of the higher quality content or to be aware of the capabilities of their device to access the content. The subscribers may be given the opportunity to purchase the higher quality forms of the content and the suitability of the subscriber's device to access the content may be determined from a configuration of the device and/or from elements connected thereto.
One non-limiting aspect of the present invention relates to automatically preventing subscribers from continuously attempting to access higher quality forms of content if the subscribers are not entitled to access the content and/or if their device is unsuitable to such access. This may include automatically offering to support the higher quality content if the subscriber attempts to tune to the higher quality content when not entitled and/or issue a message or other warning to the subscriber if the device is unsuitable for accessing the higher quality content.
One non-limiting aspect of the present invention relates to allowing cable television service providers or other electronic media distribution entities to support multiple quality formats. For example, one non-limiting aspect of the present invention relates to a system for supporting standard definition (SD) and high definition (HD) television channel broadcasting. The system may include a regional enterprise configured for broadcasting SD and HD television signals to a number of STBs. The STBs may be configured to automatically tune to an HD television channel having content corresponding to a requested SD television channel such that the provider may broadcasts multiple types of content without having to target the higher quality content to specific subscribers, as the subscriber devices can instead be relied upon to automatically access the higher quality content if available.
If a portion of the STBs are HD enabled and portion of the STBs are not HD enabled, the regional enterprise may be configured to enable the HD enabled STBs to automatically tune to HD television channels without having to perform any substantial operations with respect to the non-HD enabled STBs. If a portion of the HD enabled STBs are associated with non-HD enabled televisions, the regional enterprise may be configured to instruct the HD enabled STBs associated with the non-HD enabled televisions to prevent tuning to HD television channels and instead allow the HD enabled STB to tune to SD television channels.
One non-limiting aspect of the present invention relates to an algorithm or other logically functioning element having suitable capabilities such that, when a service is selected/requested, it can look up the service in a channel map or other feature and set a tuner or other feature to a frequency or other variable to access a higher quality form of the selected/requested service. Optionally, the algorithm may include some or all of the following processes: (1) user selects/requests a service by channel number or via channel up/down keys; (2) software controlling the channel acquisition may lookup the selected/requested service to determine its source ID; (3) the software may also determine if there are alternative formats available for that service (content); (4) if alternative formats are available it may compare the available formats with the selected output device to determine the highest quality match; (5) the selected high quality match may then be used to tune the tuner and select the service from the QAM; (6) the channel number displayed on the LEDs or on the On-screen display may reflect the user's selected channel, which may be independent of the actual service selected/requested/acquired; and (7) this process may repeat upon another channel change.
One non-limiting aspect of the present invention relates to understand type of display device is being used or attempted for use with requested content so as to facilitate assessing whether the higher quality content can be supported on the associated display device. This may be automatically determined without subscriber interaction, such as but not limited to assessments carried out over HDMI or DVI cables used to connect the STB to HD-enabled displays.
One non-limiting aspect of the present invention relates to a smart selection capability that may enhance user experiences for valued high end subscribers. This may simplify the channel selection and allow providers to display the highest quality experience. In the future the selection methodology can be applied to targeting different advertising to different users based on which format of service is selected (perhaps a demographic of the high end video user). This same concept can also be applied to the Audio formats available and provided by the settop device.
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale, some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for the claims and/or as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.
While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/669,078, filed on Feb. 10, 2022, which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/987,034, filed on Aug. 6, 2020 (now U.S. Pat. No. 11,284,036), which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/755,116, filed on May 30, 2007 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,778,930), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5461427 | Duffield et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5576769 | Lendaro | Nov 1996 | A |
6034677 | Noguchi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6108044 | Shin | Aug 2000 | A |
6359580 | Morrison | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6594825 | Goldschmidt Iki et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6772433 | LaJoie et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
7061542 | Ikeguchi | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7209874 | Salmonsen | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7370343 | Ellis | May 2008 | B1 |
7551229 | Ozaki et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7567565 | La Joie | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7830800 | Masterson et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7924451 | Hirooka | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8087058 | Cohen | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8108901 | Nicas et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8166504 | Kang et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8239573 | Brownrigg, Jr. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8375414 | Covey | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8935726 | Patel et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9003441 | Jindal et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9104669 | Des Jardins et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9241170 | Galligan | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9578363 | Potrebic et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
10015223 | Patel et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
20010019365 | Kim et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020009289 | Morishita et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020059602 | Macrae et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020076194 | Watanabe | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020144276 | Radford | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020145611 | Dye et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020196939 | Unger et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030051249 | Hoang | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040040039 | Bernier | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050044566 | Jerding et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050180858 | Halgas | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050213938 | Ozawa et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050244070 | Itakura | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273807 | Nissing | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060005223 | Weng et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015580 | Gabriel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060061682 | Bradley et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060123455 | Pai et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133775 | Ju | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156352 | Smith et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171390 | La Joie | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184992 | Kortum et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060188235 | Umei et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060222110 | Kuhtz | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060274203 | Naganuma et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282852 | Purpura et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070101370 | Calderwood | May 2007 | A1 |
20070157260 | Walker | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192192 | Haberman et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204292 | Riedl et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204314 | Hasek et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070207794 | Dunko | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214488 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070223870 | Farling et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070256111 | Medford et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080034391 | Lehman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046924 | Hood | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080066103 | Ellis et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080107023 | Kang | May 2008 | A1 |
20080141303 | Walker et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080141317 | Radloff et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080178219 | Grannan | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195466 | Wright | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201748 | Hasek et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222703 | Mantani | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080301749 | Harrar et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307485 | Clement et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090025027 | Craner | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028182 | Brooks et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031335 | Hendricks et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031384 | Brooks et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090150958 | Jerding et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090190028 | Rodriguez et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090262136 | Tischer et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100054712 | Wollmershauser et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100150531 | Corry et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162292 | Potrebic et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100180293 | Brown et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192180 | Olague et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110102675 | Jackson | May 2011 | A1 |
20110102683 | Josephs | May 2011 | A1 |
20110103374 | Lajoie et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110239242 | Grevers, Jr. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110258665 | Fahrny et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120072954 | Karaoguz et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084814 | Olague et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102535 | Weintraub et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120284736 | Friedman | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130061259 | Raman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
H08275073 | Oct 1996 | JP |
2005125200 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2007078503 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2008042242 | Apr 2008 | WO |
09118041 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/032463, mailed Jul. 15, 2011. |
O'Donnell, White Paper, HDMI™: The Digital Display Link, Dec. 2006, 21 pages. |
Extended European Search Report—EP 11769576.7—Mailing Date: Sep. 20, 2013. |
Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications, eDOCSIS™ Specification, CM-SP-eDOCSISI18-090529, Copyright 2003-2009 Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., 72 pages. |
Canadian Office action—CA 2,632,295—Mailing date: Feb. 17, 2015. |
Canadian Response to Office Action—CA App. 2,632,295—submitted Jul. 23, 2015. |
Canadian Office Action—CA Appl. 2,632,295—dated Dec. 9, 2015. |
European Office Action—EP Appl. 11769576.7—dated Feb. 6, 2017. |
J. De Wachter et al., “Optimizing Channel Switching For Digital Television Through Low Quality Streams,” an excerpt of the Proceedings of the Sixth IASTED International Conference, Communication Systems and Networks, ACTA Press, 2007, pp. 55-62. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230353703 A1 | Nov 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17669078 | Feb 2022 | US |
Child | 18128056 | US | |
Parent | 16987034 | Aug 2020 | US |
Child | 17669078 | US | |
Parent | 11755116 | May 2007 | US |
Child | 16987034 | US |