Selection of managed forwarding element for bridge spanning multiple datacenters

Abstract
Some embodiments provide a method for a set of central controllers that manages forwarding elements operating in a plurality of datacenters. The method receives a configuration for a bridge between (i) a logical L2 network that spans at least two datacenters and (ii) a physical L2 network. The configuration specifies a particular one of the datacenters for implementation of the bridge. The method identifies multiple managed forwarding elements that implement the logical L2 network and are operating in the particular datacenter. The method selects one of the identified managed forwarding elements to implement the bridge. The method distributes bridge configuration data to the selected managed forwarding element.
Description
BACKGROUND

Bridging is a technique used to connect different L2 networks (e.g., different virtual local area networks (VLANs) or logical switches) without routing when the L2 networks share the same subnet. For instance, a bridge could be used to connect workloads (e.g., virtual machines, physical servers) that connect to a VLAN to workloads that connect to a virtual extensible local area network (VXLAN). The use of such bridges is generally constrained to logical networks that are contained within a single datacenter.


BRIEF SUMMARY

Some embodiments provide a method for implementing a bridge between a logical L2 network (e.g., a logical switch) that spans multiple datacenters and a physical L2 network located in one of the datacenters spanned by the logical network. In some embodiments, a network manager located at one of the datacenters receives the configuration for the bridge (e.g., from an administrator) and provides this configuration to a set of central controllers that manages the multiple datacenters, along with a datacenter identifier that specifies the particular datacenter in which the physical L2 network is located. The set of central controllers stores information about the managed forwarding elements at each of the datacenters managed by the central controllers, including datacenter identifiers. Using this data, the set of central controllers selects one of the managed forwarding elements that is located in the same datacenter as the physical L2 network. In addition, some embodiments also require that the selected managed forwarding element operate in a host machine on which a data compute node (e.g., a virtual machine) that connects to the logical network resides.


The set of central controllers receives the bridge configuration as a 3-tuple in some embodiments, that includes (i) a logical network (e.g., VXLAN) identifier, (ii) a physical network (e.g., VLAN) identifier, and (iii) a datacenter identifier. As noted above, each managed forwarding element (which may be, e.g., virtual switches operating in virtualization software of host machines in the datacenters) has an associated datacenter identifier as well. The set of central controllers stores this managed forwarding element data as well as information indicating on which host machine each of the data compute nodes (DCNs) attached to the logical L2 network resides. Using this information, the set of central controllers can select one of the managed forwarding elements that fits both criteria (i.e., operates in a host machine that is located in the datacenter identified in the 3-tuple, and on which one of the logical network DCNs resides).


The set of central controllers distributes the bridge configuration to the selected managed forwarding element, which implements the bridge for packets sent between the logical L2 network and physical L2 network. The managed forwarding element bridges packets by, e.g., removing a logical network identifier from a packet and adding a physical network identifier (e.g., a VLAN tag), or vice versa.


In certain circumstances, the bridge may need to be implemented in multiple datacenters, either moving from one datacenter to another as a failover mechanism or in a configuration in which the bridge operates simultaneously in multiple datacenters at once (e.g., bridging physical L2 networks in multiple datacenters onto the same logical L2 network). Thus, some embodiments use a generic physical network identifier in the bridge configuration that maps to different specific physical L2 networks at different datacenters. The network managers at two different datacenters receive the same configuration specifying a bridge between a logical L2 network that spans the two datacenters and a physical network identifier. The first network manager (at the first datacenter) maps this physical network identifier to a first physical L2 network (e.g., a VLAN) at the first datacenter while the second network manager (at the second datacenter) maps this physical network identifier to a second physical L2 network at the second datacenter. The network managers, in some embodiments, provide the configurations to the set of central controllers using their respective datacenter identifiers and specific physical L2 network identifiers in order for the central controllers to select managed forwarding elements at the two different datacenters to which to provide the respective bridge configurations.


As mentioned, one such circumstance of some embodiments that uses the generic physical network identifier involves moving the bridge from one datacenter to another. In this scenario, the first network manager initially provides the bridge configuration for the first datacenter (i.e., using the first datacenter identifier and an identifier for a specific physical L2 network located at the first datacenter) to the set of controllers, which configures the bridge on a managed forwarding element in the first datacenter. If the first network manager fails (e.g., the machine on which the first network manager operates fails, loses communication, etc.), some embodiments move the bridge to a second datacenter also spanned by the logical L2 network. This second datacenter may have a physical L2 network that acts as a backup for the physical L2 network at the first datacenter. Thus, the second network manager (at the second datacenter) provides the bridge configuration for the second datacenter (using the second datacenter identifier and an identifier for the specific physical L2 network located at the second datacenter) to the set of controllers, which configures the bridge on a managed forwarding element in the second datacenter.


In an active-active scenario, physical L2 networks at more than one datacenter are bridged onto the logical L2 network at the same time. That is, each of the network managers at their respective datacenters maps the generic physical network identifier to their own specific physical L2 network, and provides their separate configuration to the set of central controllers, which configures bridges at each datacenter. Thus, the same traffic from a logical network DCN (e.g., broadcast or multicast traffic) can be bridged onto multiple physical L2 networks at different datacenters.


Having multiple physical L2 networks at different datacenters bridged onto the same logical network can create the possibility of traffic loops as well as undesired connectivity between the physical L2 networks at different datacenters. For instance, a broadcast packet sent from a DCN on the first datacenter's physical L2 network would be bridged onto the logical network by the bridge at the first datacenter, and (because it is a broadcast packet) would reach the bridge at the second datacenter, which would (at least) bridge the packet onto the physical L2 network at the second datacenter. Thus, as the logical network packets are tunneled between host machines (e.g., using VXLAN, GENEVE, STT, etc.), some embodiments use an available field or portion thereof (e.g., a single bit) in the tunnel encapsulation header to identify that a packet has already been bridged. When the managed forwarding element implementing the bridge receives such a packet, the forwarding element does not bridge the packet again, instead just delivering the packet to its destination (e.g., the logical network DCN residing on that host machine).


The preceding Summary is intended to serve as a brief introduction to some embodiments of the invention. It is not meant to be an introduction or overview of all inventive subject matter disclosed in this document. The Detailed Description that follows and the Drawings that are referred to in the Detailed Description will further describe the embodiments described in the Summary as well as other embodiments. Accordingly, to understand all the embodiments described by this document, a full review of the Summary, Detailed Description and the Drawings is needed. Moreover, the claimed subject matters are not to be limited by the illustrative details in the Summary, Detailed Description and the Drawing, but rather are to be defined by the appended claims, because the claimed subject matters can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit of the subject matters.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The novel features of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. However, for purpose of explanation, several embodiments of the invention are set forth in the following figures.



FIG. 1 conceptually illustrates a process of some embodiments to select a managed forwarding element to implement a bridge between a logical network that spans multiple datacenters and a physical network at one of the datacenters.



FIG. 2 conceptually illustrates a set of central controllers that receives a bridge configuration, selects a managed forwarding element, and provides the bridge configuration to the selected managed forwarding element.



FIG. 3 conceptually illustrates an example of the selection of an MFE for a bridge by a central controller.



FIG. 4 conceptually illustrates an example of an MFE bridging a packet sent from a first DCN on a logical network to a second DCN on a physical L2 network.



FIG. 5 conceptually illustrates the mapping of some embodiments of generic physical network identifiers to specific physical L2 networks by different network managers.



FIG. 6 conceptually illustrates a process of some embodiments for generating a bridge configuration 3-tuple based on a generic physical network identifier.



FIG. 7 conceptually illustrates an example of a failover scenario of some embodiments.



FIG. 8 conceptually illustrates an example of an active-active scenario of some embodiments for a bridge in two datacenters.



FIG. 9 conceptually illustrates an example of a broadcast packet being sent between bridges in different datacenters.



FIG. 10 conceptually illustrates an electronic system with which some embodiments of the invention are implemented.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following detailed description of the invention, numerous details, examples, and embodiments of the invention are set forth and described. However, it will be clear and apparent to one skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the embodiments set forth and that the invention may be practiced without some of the specific details and examples discussed.


Some embodiments provide a method for implementing a bridge between a logical L2 network (e.g., a logical switch) that spans multiple datacenters and a physical L2 network located in one of the datacenters spanned by the logical network. In some embodiments, a network manager located at one of the datacenters receives the configuration for the bridge (e.g., from an administrator) and provides this configuration to a set of central controllers that manages the multiple datacenters, along with a datacenter identifier that specifies the particular datacenter in which the physical L2 network is located. The set of central controllers stores information about the managed forwarding elements at each of the datacenters managed by the central controllers, including datacenter identifiers. Using this data, the set of central controllers selects one of the managed forwarding elements that is located in the same datacenter as the physical L2 network. In addition, some embodiments also require that the selected managed forwarding element operate in a host machine on which a data compute node (e.g., a virtual machine) that connects to the logical network resides.



FIG. 1 conceptually illustrates a process 100 of some embodiments to select a managed forwarding element to implement a bridge between a logical network that spans multiple datacenters and a physical network at one of the datacenters. The process 100 is performed by a set of central controllers in some embodiments.


The process 100 will be described in part by reference to FIGS. 2 and 3. FIG. 2 illustrates a set of central controllers 200, as well as managed forwarding elements (MFEs) operating in two datacenters 205 and 210. The set of central controllers 200 may be a single controller, a cluster of controllers, etc. The controllers may be located, in different embodiments, at one or the other of the datacenters 205 and 210, divided between the datacenters, or located at a different location (e.g., at a datacenter other than these two).


The managed forwarding elements are configurable forwarding elements that receive configuration data distributed by the set of central controllers 200. In some embodiments, the managed forwarding elements are software forwarding elements (e.g., virtual switches, virtual routers, combined switch/router software modules, etc.) that execute within the virtualization software (e.g., hypervisors) of different host machines in the datacenters.


The process 100 begins by receiving (at 105) a bridge configuration as a three-tuple including (i) a logical network identifier, (ii) a physical network identifier, and (iii) a datacenter identifier. In some embodiments, this data is received from a network manager that operates at one of the datacenters (i.e., the datacenter specified by the datacenter identifier). The network manager receives the bridge configuration, e.g., through an application programming interface (API) based on user input to specify a bridge between a logical L2 network and a physical L2 network, and provides the configuration data (with the datacenter identifier) to the set of central controllers. In some embodiments, the network manager maps a generic physical network identifier in the configuration received through the API to a specific physical L2 network at the datacenter. This mapping performed by the network manager is explained in more detail below.


In FIG. 2, the set of central controllers 200 receives a bridge configuration identifying a logical L2 network with the identifier VXLAN 10, a physical L2 network with the identifier VLAN 100, and a datacenter identifier DC1. The logical network identifier, in some embodiments, specifies a particular logical switch (also referred to as a distributed virtual switch), such as a VXLAN network. A logical switch is an abstract of a switch defined by an administrator that logically connects data compute nodes (e.g., VMs, containers, etc.) that may not be connected to the same physical switch. In some embodiments, the data compute nodes connected to a logical switch may be distributed across multiple racks within a datacenter, or even multiple datacenters. When data compute nodes (DCNs) on the same logical switch communicate with each other, they do so as though they are connected to the same physical switch, while the physical network (e.g., the MFEs) between them uses, e.g., tunnel encapsulation to preserve this abstraction.


The physical network identifier, in some embodiments, identifies a VLAN or similar L2 construct that operates within a single datacenter. The physical L2 networks do not use an overlay network to communicate, and are thus confined to a single datacenter. Lastly, the datacenter identifier specifies a particular one of the datacenters that host machines connected to the logical network.


Next, the process 100 identifies (at 110) MFEs that (i) have the same datacenter identifier as the datacenter identifier received as part of the bridge configuration and (ii) operate on host machines on which DCNs of the logical network reside. In some embodiments, each DCN of the logical network directly connects to a managed forwarding element that operates on the same physical host machine as the DCN. In some embodiments, a set of MFEs (e.g., one or more virtual switches, virtual routers, etc.) operates on a physical host machine, and the process identifies MFEs that implement bridges that operate on the same host machine as the DCN. For instance, a virtual router might implement the bridge, while the DCN connects directly to a virtual switch which in turn connects to the virtual router. In the example shown in FIG. 2, each of MFE1, MFE2, and MFE3 would be identified as having the same datacenter identifier as specified by the bridge configuration, but not all of these would necessarily operate on the same physical host as a DCN attached to the logical network VXLAN 10.


The process 100 then selects (at 115) one of the identified MFEs (that meets the above criteria) to implement the bridge in the specified datacenter. Different embodiments may make the selection randomly or pseudo-randomly, using load balancing techniques (i.e., balancing the number of bridges for different logical networks that are implemented on the different MFEs of a datacenter), etc.



FIG. 3 conceptually illustrates an example of the selection of an MFE for a bridge by a central controller 300. As shown, the controller receives a bridge configuration (e.g., from a network manager) for a bridge between logical L2 network VXLAN 10, physical L2 network VLAN 100, in datacenter 1. The central controller 300 stores a mapping of each MFE in datacenters 1 and 2 to their respective datacenter identifier. Thus, the central controller can identify that MFE1, MFE2, and MFE3 have the same datacenter identifier as specified in the bridge configuration. In addition, the central controller stores (or calculates) the span of the logical L2 network VXLAN 10, which includes MFE1, MFE2, MFE4, and MFE 6. These are the MFEs that are configured to implement VXLAN 10, for example because they operate on the same host machine on which DCNs belonging to VXLAN 10 reside. Based on this data, the central controller 300 can select either MFE1 or MFE2, and in this example selects MFE2.


Finally, the process 100 distributes (at 120) bridge configuration data to the selected MFE. The process then ends. In FIG. 2, the set of central controllers 300 selects MFE2, and distributes bridge configuration data to the MFE, instructing the MFE to set up a bridge between VXLAN 10 and VLAN 100. In some embodiments, the set of central controllers actually distributes this information as a data tuple to a local controller operating on the same host as the MFE (e.g., also in the virtualization software of the host machine). The local controller then converts the data tuple into configuration data for the specific type of MFE operating on the host (e.g., flow entries for a flow-based MFE, other types of configuration data for other types of MFEs). In addition, in some embodiments, the set of central controllers distribute to the other MFEs (at least those operating on host machines on which DCNs attached to the logical network reside) the location of the bridge as well as the list of addresses (e.g., MAC addresses) in each of the networks being bridged, so that packets requiring bridging can be identified and sent to MFE2.


The selected managed forwarding element bridges packets by, e.g., removing a logical network identifier from a packet and adding a physical network identifier (e.g., a VLAN tag), or vice versa. FIG. 4 conceptually illustrates an example of a MFE 400 operating to bridge a packet sent from a first DCN (VM1) on a logical network (VXLAN 10) to a second DCN (VM9) on a physical L2 network (VLAN 100). As shown, the first DCN 405 sends a unicast packet with its own MAC address as the source address and the MAC address of the second DCN 410 as the destination address.


The MFE 415 to which this first DCN connects processes the packet and determines that the packet requires bridging by the bridge MFE 400. As such, the MFE 415 tunnels the packet to the bridge MFE 400, using VXLAN encapsulation (which includes the VXLAN identifier in the outer encapsulation header). The bridge MFE 400 receives this packet, removes the encapsulation, and, based on the destination MAC address, determines that the packet needs to be bridged onto VLAN 100. As such, the bridge MFE 400 adds a VLAN tag (for VLAN 100) to the packet, and sends the packet onto the VLAN (which could involve tunneling the packet to a hardware switch, such as a TOR, that connects to the DCNs on the VLAN).


In the above example, the bridge is configured to operate in a specific datacenter in which the physical L2 network is located. In certain circumstances, the bridge may need to be implemented in multiple datacenters, either moving from one datacenter to another as a failover mechanism or in a configuration in which the bridge operates simultaneously in multiple datacenters at once (e.g., bridging physical L2 networks in multiple datacenters onto the same logical L2 network). Thus, some embodiments use a generic physical network identifier in the bridge configuration that maps to different specific physical L2 networks at different datacenters. The network managers at two different datacenters receive the same configuration specifying a bridge between a logical L2 network that spans the two datacenters and a physical network identifier. The first network manager (at the first datacenter) maps this physical network identifier to a first physical L2 network (e.g., a VLAN) at the first datacenter while the second network manager (at the second datacenter) maps this physical network identifier to a second physical L2 network at the second datacenter. The network managers, in some embodiments, provide the configurations to the set of central controllers using their respective datacenter identifiers and specific physical L2 network identifiers in order for the central controllers to select managed forwarding elements at the two different datacenters to which to provide the respective bridge configurations.



FIG. 5 conceptually illustrates the mapping of some embodiments of generic physical network identifiers to specific physical L2 networks by different network managers 505-515. As shown, these three network managers 505-515 operate in three different datacenters, and store their own separate mappings of generic physical network identifiers (PNIDs) to specific VLANs at their respective datacenters. Thus, if the first network manager 505 receives a bridge configuration including PNID2, the network manager 505 will map this to VLAN 200, and provide this (along with an identifier for datacenter 1) as part of the 3-tuple sent to the set of central controllers to setup the bridge. If the second network manager 510 receives the same bridge configuration with PNID2, this network manager 510 will map the PNID to its own VLAN 400, and provide this (along with an identifier for datacenter 2) as part of the 3-tuple sent to the set of central controllers to setup the bridge. As can be seen, the second datacenter also has a VLAN 100, though this is associated with PNID3 (which could be for a completely different tenant). In addition, not all of the PNIDs will necessarily map to physical L2 networks in all of the datacenters. In this case, PNID3 does not map to any network in the third datacenter.



FIG. 6 conceptually illustrates a process 600 of some embodiments for generating a bridge configuration 3-tuple based on a generic physical network identifier. The process 600 is performed, in some embodiments, by a network manager located at a particular datacenter. The network managers across the various datacenters, in some embodiments, form a management plane. The management plane provides APIs through which administrators (e.g., via cloud management software) provide logical network configuration, to set up logical switches, logical routers, distributed firewalls, bridges between logical switches and physical L2 networks, etc. Among other responsibilities, in some embodiments the management plane translates the configuration from the administrators into the configuration for distribution to the MFEs (or local controllers). The set of central controllers receives this configuration and determines to which MFEs (or local controllers) each piece of configuration data should be distributed (and performs this distribution).


As shown, the process 600 begins by receiving (at 605) a bridge configuration that includes a logical network identifier and a generic physical network identifier. As in the description above, the logical network identifier specifies a logical switch such as a VXLAN network, which in this case spans multiple datacenters. The generic physical network identifier, as mentioned, maps to different specific physical L2 networks at different datacenters.


Next, the process 600 maps (at 610) the generic physical network identifier to a specific physical network identifier for the datacenter. The specific physical network identifier represents a specific VLAN or other physical L2 network at the particular datacenter where the network manager operates, in some embodiments. As shown in FIG. 5, the network manager of some embodiments stores data mapping each generic physical network identifier to its corresponding local specific physical network identifier.


The process 600 then provides (at 615) the bridge configuration to the set of central controllers as a 3-tuple that includes the logical network identifier, the specific physical network identifier (to which the generic physical network identifier was mapped), and a datacenter identifier. As before, the datacenter identifier specifies the datacenter in which the bridge will be located, which is the datacenter of the network manager and the datacenter in which the specific physical L2 network is located. For the same bridge, different network managers will provide different configuration 3-tuples to the set of central controllers (though the logical network identifier will be the same between these 3-tuples).


As mentioned, one such circumstance of some embodiments that uses the generic physical network identifier involves moving the bridge from one datacenter to another. FIG. 7 conceptually illustrates an example of such a failover scenario of some embodiments over two stages 705 and 710. As shown in the first stage 705, the figure illustrates two network managers 715 and 720 located at two datacenters 725 and 730, respectively. Each of the datacenters 725 and 730 includes three MFEs, and there is a set of central controllers 700 that provides configuration data to the MFEs at both datacenters.


The first stage 705 illustrates the initial setup for a bridge at the first datacenter 705. In this stage, the first network manager 715 initially receives input requesting that a bridge be configured between the logical L2 network VXLAN 10 and the generic physical L2 network represented by PNID 2. The first network manager 715 provides this bridge configuration to the second network manager 720 (as well as the network managers at any other datacenters spanned by the logical L2 network), which does not yet act on this information. In addition, the first network manager 715 maps the PNID to its specific local physical L2 network VLAN 200 and provides the bridge configuration 3-tuple to the set of central controllers 700. This 3-tuple, as shown, specifies VXLAN 10 (the logical network for the bridge), VLAN 200 (the physical network for the bridge at datacenter 1), and the first datacenter 725.


Based on this data, the set of central controllers 700 configures the bridge on a managed forwarding element (MFE3) in the first datacenter 725 (e.g., by providing the configuration data to the local controller that manages this MFE). In addition, in some embodiments, the set of controllers 700 provides configuration data to each of the other MFEs in both datacenters (or at least the MFEs connected to DCNs on the logical network) so that those MFEs send packets requiring bridging to MFE3.


If the first network manager fails (e.g., the machine on which the first network manager operates fails, loses communication, etc.), some embodiments move the bridge to a second datacenter also spanned by the logical L2 network. This second datacenter may have a physical L2 network that acts as a backup for the physical L2 network at the first datacenter.


In the second stage, the network manager 715 fails, and the second network manager 720 is notified of this failure. This notification may occur based on a message sent from the central controllers 700 or elsewhere, or because the second network manager 720 can no longer reach the first network manager 715. The second network manager 720 maps the PNID for the bridge to its specific local physical L2 network VLAN 400 and provides the bridge configuration 3-tuple to the set of central controllers 700. This 3-tuple, as shown, specifies VXLAN 10 (the logical network for the bridge), VLAN 400 (the physical network for the bridge at datacenter 2), and the identifier for the second datacenter 730.


Based on this data, the set of central controllers 700 configures the bridge on a managed forwarding element (MFE4) in the second datacenter 730 (e.g., by providing the configuration data to the local controller that manages this MFE). In addition, in some embodiments, the set of controllers 700 provides configuration data to each of the other MFEs in both datacenters (or at least the MFEs connected to DCNs on the logical network) so that those MFEs send packets requiring bridging to MFE4.


The use of a generic physical network identifier also enables an active-active setup, with bridges operating on multiple datacenters to bridge different physical L2 networks onto the logical L2 network at the same time. To enable this scenario, each of the network managers at their respective datacenters maps the generic physical network identifier to their own specific physical L2 network, and provides their separate configuration to the set of central controllers, which configures bridges at each datacenter. Thus, the same traffic from a logical network DCN (e.g., broadcast or multicast traffic) can be bridged onto multiple physical L2 networks at different datacenters.



FIG. 8 conceptually illustrates an example of such an active-active scenario of some embodiments for a bridge in two datacenters 805 and 810. The figure illustrates two network managers 815 and 820 located at the two datacenters 805 and 810, respectively. Each of the datacenters 805 and 810 includes three MFEs, and the figure additionally illustrates a set of central controllers 800 that provides configuration data to the MFEs at both datacenters.


As shown, the network manager 815 at the first datacenter 805 initially receives input (e.g., through its API) requesting that a bridge be configured between the logical L2 network VXLAN 10 and the generic physical L2 network represented by PNID 2. The first network manager 815 provides this bridge configuration to the second network manager 820 at the second datacenter 810, as well as the network managers at any other datacenters spanned by the logical L2 network VXLAN 10.


Each of these network managers 815 and 820 maps the PNID to its respective specific physical L2 network (VLAN 200 for the first network manager 815 and VLAN 400 for the second network manager 820). In addition, each of the network managers 815 and 820 provides its respective bridge configuration 3-tuple to the set of central controllers 800. As shown, the first network manager 815 sends a 3-tuple specifying VXLAN 10 (the logical network for the bridge), VLAN 200 (the physical network for the bridge at the first datacenter), and the datacenter identifier for the first datacenter 805. The second network manager 820 sends a 3-tuple specifying VXLAN 10 (the same logical network for the bridge), VLAN 400 (the physical network for the bridge at the second datacenter), and the datacenter identifier for the second datacenter 810.


Based on the 3-tuple from the first network manager 815, the set of central controllers 800 selects a managed forwarding element (MFE2) in the first datacenter 805 and configures the bridge on this MFE (e.g., by providing the configuration data to the local controller that manages this MFE). As shown, MFE2 is configured as a bridge between VXLAN 10 and VLAN 200. In addition, based on the 3-tuple from the second network manager 820, the set of central controllers 800 selects a managed forwarding element (MFE4) in the second datacenter 810 and configures the bridge on this MFE (e.g., by providing the configuration data to the local controller that manages this MFE). As shown, MFE4 is configured as a bridge between VXLAN 10 and VLAN 400.


In addition, in some embodiments, the set of controllers provides configuration data to each of the other MFEs in both datacenters (or at least the MFEs connected to DCNs on the logical network) so that these MFEs send packets requiring bridging to MFE2 or MFE4. In some embodiments, an MFE always sends packets requiring bridging to the bridge in its respective datacenter. However, in other embodiments, each of the MFEs receives information about both bridges, so that packets that need to be bridged onto the physical network in the first datacenter can be sent to the bridge in the first datacenter and packets that need to be bridged onto the physical network in the second datacenter can be sent to the bridge in the second datacenter.


Having multiple physical L2 networks at different datacenters bridged onto the same logical network can create the possibility of traffic loops as well as undesired connectivity between the physical L2 networks at different datacenters. In general, the traffic that requires bridging is either unicast traffic from a DCN on the logical L2 network to a DCN on the physical L2 network (or vice versa) or BUM traffic (broadcast, unknown unicast, or multicast) traffic. Unicast traffic will typically not cause loops, and should not cause data packets to be sent from the physical L2 network in one datacenter to the physical L2 network in another datacenter (as those DCNs should not be sending each other traffic in the first place in such embodiments).


However, BUM traffic can create these issues. For instance, a broadcast packet sent from a DCN on the first datacenter's physical L2 network would be bridged onto the logical network by the bridge at the first datacenter, and (because it is a broadcast packet) would reach the bridge at the second datacenter, which would (at least) bridge the packet onto the physical L2 network at the second datacenter. In addition, if a bridge is present at three datacenters, then the first bridge to receive a broadcast packet from its physical L2 network would broadcast this packet to the second and third bridges. In processing the packet, the second bridge would send the packet to the third bridge (possibly avoiding sending the packet back to the first bridge because the packet is not sent out the port on which it was received). The third bridge would also send the packet to the second bridge for the same reason, and both of these bridges would send the packets to the first bridge, creating a loop.


In some embodiments, each time a packet is sent from one of the MFEs to another (including from a bridge in one datacenter to a bridge in another datacenter), the packet is encapsulated (e.g., using VXLAN, GENEVE, STT, etc.). Thus, to prevent traffic loops or having a physical L2 network in one datacenter send traffic to a physical L2 network in another datacenter, some embodiments use an available field or portion thereof (e.g., a single bit) in the tunnel encapsulation header to identify that a packet has already been bridged. When the managed forwarding element implementing the bridge receives such a packet, the forwarding element does not bridge the packet again, instead just delivering the packet to its destination (e.g., the logical network DCN residing on that host machine).



FIG. 9 conceptually illustrates an example of a broadcast packet being sent between bridges in different datacenters. As shown, the packet is initially sent from a first VM 905 on VLAN 200 in a first datacenter 910 to its local bridge MFE 915. The packet has a source MAC address of the sender VM (VM8) and the broadcast destination address (FFFFFFFFFFFF). The packet also includes a VLAN tag at this point. Though not shown, this packet would be broadcast to the other DCNs on VLAN 200 in the first datacenter as well.


The bridge MFE 915 in the first datacenter 910 receives and processes this packet, bridging the packet to the logical L2 network VXLAN 10. This includes delivering the packet to its local DCN 920 (VM1) that is connected to this logical L2 network, to which the packet is sent (after removing the VLAN tag). The packet is also tunneled to the other MFEs that have VMs on the logical L2 network, including the bridge(s) in other datacenters. In this case, the packet is tunneled to the bridge MFE 925 in the second datacenter 930, in addition to various other MFEs (not shown) in both the first and second datacenters. The encapsulation, as shown, includes the identifier for VXLAN 10, the source and destination IP addresses of tunnel endpoints at the two MFEs, as well as a bridged bit set to 1. This bridged bit identifies the packet as having been bridged, so that the MFE4 will not bridge the packet again.


The bridge MFE 925 receives the packet from the bridge MFE 915 and processes this packet. The MFE 925 delivers the packet to the VM 935, which is on the logical L2 network VXLAN 10. However, because the bridged bit is set in the packet, the MFE 925 does not send the packet out onto its local physical L2 network (and thus VM 940 does not receive the packet), as shown by the crossed-out arrow.



FIG. 10 conceptually illustrates an electronic system 1000 with which some embodiments of the invention are implemented. The electronic system 1000 can be used to execute any of the control, virtualization, or operating system applications described above. The electronic system 1000 may be a computer (e.g., a desktop computer, personal computer, tablet computer, server computer, mainframe, a blade computer etc.), phone, PDA, or any other sort of electronic device. Such an electronic system includes various types of computer readable media and interfaces for various other types of computer readable media. Electronic system 1000 includes a bus 1005, processing unit(s) 1010, a system memory 1025, a read-only memory 1030, a permanent storage device 1035, input devices 1040, and output devices 1045.


The bus 1005 collectively represents all system, peripheral, and chipset buses that communicatively connect the numerous internal devices of the electronic system 1000. For instance, the bus 1005 communicatively connects the processing unit(s) 1010 with the read-only memory 1030, the system memory 1025, and the permanent storage device 1035.


From these various memory units, the processing unit(s) 1010 retrieve instructions to execute and data to process in order to execute the processes of the invention. The processing unit(s) may be a single processor or a multi-core processor in different embodiments.


The read-only-memory (ROM) 1030 stores static data and instructions that are needed by the processing unit(s) 1010 and other modules of the electronic system. The permanent storage device 1035, on the other hand, is a read-and-write memory device. This device is a non-volatile memory unit that stores instructions and data even when the electronic system 1000 is off. Some embodiments of the invention use a mass-storage device (such as a magnetic or optical disk and its corresponding disk drive) as the permanent storage device 1035.


Other embodiments use a removable storage device (such as a floppy disk, flash drive, etc.) as the permanent storage device. Like the permanent storage device 1035, the system memory 1025 is a read-and-write memory device. However, unlike storage device 1035, the system memory is a volatile read-and-write memory, such a random-access memory. The system memory stores some of the instructions and data that the processor needs at runtime. In some embodiments, the invention's processes are stored in the system memory 1025, the permanent storage device 1035, and/or the read-only memory 1030. From these various memory units, the processing unit(s) 1010 retrieve instructions to execute and data to process in order to execute the processes of some embodiments.


The bus 1005 also connects to the input and output devices 1040 and 1045. The input devices enable the user to communicate information and select commands to the electronic system. The input devices 1040 include alphanumeric keyboards and pointing devices (also called “cursor control devices”). The output devices 1045 display images generated by the electronic system. The output devices include printers and display devices, such as cathode ray tubes (CRT) or liquid crystal displays (LCD). Some embodiments include devices such as a touchscreen that function as both input and output devices.


Finally, as shown in FIG. 10, bus 1005 also couples electronic system 1000 to a network 1065 through a network adapter (not shown). In this manner, the computer can be a part of a network of computers (such as a local area network (“LAN”), a wide area network (“WAN”), or an Intranet, or a network of networks, such as the Internet. Any or all components of electronic system 1000 may be used in conjunction with the invention.


Some embodiments include electronic components, such as microprocessors, storage and memory that store computer program instructions in a machine-readable or computer-readable medium (alternatively referred to as computer-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or machine-readable storage media). Some examples of such computer-readable media include RAM, ROM, read-only compact discs (CD-ROM), recordable compact discs (CD-R), rewritable compact discs (CD-RW), read-only digital versatile discs (e.g., DVD-ROM, dual-layer DVD-ROM), a variety of recordable/rewritable DVDs (e.g., DVD-RAM, DVD-RW, DVD+RW, etc.), flash memory (e.g., SD cards, mini-SD cards, micro-SD cards, etc.), magnetic and/or solid state hard drives, read-only and recordable Blu-Ray® discs, ultra-density optical discs, any other optical or magnetic media, and floppy disks. The computer-readable media may store a computer program that is executable by at least one processing unit and includes sets of instructions for performing various operations. Examples of computer programs or computer code include machine code, such as is produced by a compiler, and files including higher-level code that are executed by a computer, an electronic component, or a microprocessor using an interpreter.


While the above discussion primarily refers to microprocessor or multi-core processors that execute software, some embodiments are performed by one or more integrated circuits, such as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) or field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). In some embodiments, such integrated circuits execute instructions that are stored on the circuit itself.


As used in this specification, the terms “computer”, “server”, “processor”, and “memory” all refer to electronic or other technological devices. These terms exclude people or groups of people. For the purposes of the specification, the terms display or displaying means displaying on an electronic device. As used in this specification, the terms “computer readable medium,” “computer readable media,” and “machine readable medium” are entirely restricted to tangible, physical objects that store information in a form that is readable by a computer. These terms exclude any wireless signals, wired download signals, and any other ephemeral signals.


This specification refers throughout to computational and network environments that include virtual machines (VMs). However, virtual machines are merely one example of data compute nodes (DCNs) or data compute end nodes, also referred to as addressable nodes. DCNs may include non-virtualized physical hosts, virtual machines, containers that run on top of a host operating system without the need for a hypervisor or separate operating system, and hypervisor kernel network interface modules.


VMs, in some embodiments, operate with their own guest operating systems on a host using resources of the host virtualized by virtualization software (e.g., a hypervisor, virtual machine monitor, etc.). The tenant (i.e., the owner of the VM) can choose which applications to operate on top of the guest operating system. Some containers, on the other hand, are constructs that run on top of a host operating system without the need for a hypervisor or separate guest operating system. In some embodiments, the host operating system uses name spaces to isolate the containers from each other and therefore provides operating-system level segregation of the different groups of applications that operate within different containers. This segregation is akin to the VM segregation that is offered in hypervisor-virtualized environments that virtualize system hardware, and thus can be viewed as a form of virtualization that isolates different groups of applications that operate in different containers. Such containers are more lightweight than VMs.


Hypervisor kernel network interface modules, in some embodiments, is a non-VM DCN that includes a network stack with a hypervisor kernel network interface and receive/transmit threads. One example of a hypervisor kernel network interface module is the vmknic module that is part of the ESXi™ hypervisor of VMware, Inc.


It should be understood that while the specification refers to VMs, the examples given could be any type of DCNs, including physical hosts, VMs, non-VM containers, and hypervisor kernel network interface modules. In fact, the example networks could include combinations of different types of DCNs in some embodiments.


While the invention has been described with reference to numerous specific details, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the invention can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit of the invention. In addition, a number of the figures (including FIGS. 1 and 6) conceptually illustrate processes. The specific operations of these processes may not be performed in the exact order shown and described. The specific operations may not be performed in one continuous series of operations, and different specific operations may be performed in different embodiments. Furthermore, the process could be implemented using several sub-processes, or as part of a larger macro process. Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that the invention is not to be limited by the foregoing illustrative details, but rather is to be defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. For a set of central controllers that manages forwarding elements operating in a plurality of datacenters, a method comprising: receiving a configuration for a bridge between (i) a logical L2 network that spans at least two datacenters and (ii) a physical L2 network, wherein the configuration specifies a particular one of the datacenters for implementation of the bridge by using a particular datacenter identifier that corresponds to the particular datacenter, the particular datacenter identifier one of a plurality of datacenter identifiers corresponding to the plurality of datacenters;using a stored mapping of managed forwarding elements to the plurality of datacenter identifiers to identify a plurality of managed forwarding elements that implement the logical L2 network and are operating in the particular datacenter;selecting one of the identified managed forwarding elements mapped to the particular datacenter identifier to implement the bridge in the particular datacenter; anddistributing bridge configuration data to the selected managed forwarding element.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the configuration is received from a network manager located at the particular datacenter.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the logical L2 network is a virtual extensible local area network (VXLAN) and the physical L2 network is a virtual local area network (VLAN) located at the particular datacenter.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein machines connected to the VLAN comprise virtual machines operating on host machines that are not VXLAN-compatible.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the identified managed forwarding elements operate in virtualization software of host machines located in the particular datacenter, wherein data compute nodes that logically connect to the logical L2 network operate on the host machines.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the selected managed forwarding element uses the bridge configuration to (i) bridge data packets sent from a first set of data compute nodes that are connected to the logical L2 network and execute in at least two of the plurality of datacenters to destinations in the physical L2 network and (ii) bridge data packets sent from sources in the physical L2 network to a second set of DCNs that are connected to the logical L2 network and execute in at least two of the plurality of datacenters.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein to bridge a data packet sent from a data compute node connected to the logical L2 network to a destination in the physical L2 network, the selected managed forwarding element (i) receives a data packet sent by a data compute node connected to the logical L2 network, the data packet having a destination address of a data compute node connected to the physical L2 network, (ii) removes a logical network identifier from the data packet, and (iii) adds a physical network identifier to the data packet.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein to bridge a data packet sent from a source in the physical L2 network to a DCN connected to the logical L2 network, the selected managed forwarding element (i) receives a data packet sent by a data compute node connected to the physical L2 network, the data packet having a destination address of a data compute node connected to the logical L2 network, (ii) removes a physical network identifier from the data packet, and (iii) adds a logical network identifier to the data packet.
  • 9. A non-transitory machine readable medium storing a central controller application which when executed by at least one processing unit manages forwarding elements operating in a plurality of datacenter, the central controller application comprising sets of instructions for: receiving a configuration for a bridge between (i) a logical L2 network that spans at least two datacenters and (ii) a physical L2 network, wherein the configuration specifies a particular one of the datacenters for implementation of the bridge by using a particular datacenter identifier that corresponds to the particular datacenter, the particular datacenter identifier is one of a plurality of datacenter identifiers corresponding to the plurality of datacenters, and a plurality of data compute nodes (DCNs) logically connect to the logical L2 network;using a stored mapping of managed forwarding elements to the plurality of datacenter identifiers to identify a plurality of managed forwarding elements that implement the logical L2 network and are operating in the particular datacenter on host computers on which at least one DCN logically connected to the logical L2 network also operates;selecting one of the identified managed forwarding elements mapped to the particular datacenter identifier to implement the bridge in the particular datacenter, wherein at least one DCN logically connected to the logical L2 network operates on the same host computer as the selected managed forwarding element; anddistributing bridge configuration data to the selected managed forwarding element.
  • 10. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9, wherein the configuration is received from a network manager located at the particular datacenter.
  • 11. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9, wherein the logical L2 network is a virtual extensible local area network (VXLAN) and the physical L2 network is a virtual local area network located at the particular datacenter.
  • 12. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 11, wherein DCNs connected to the VLAN comprise virtual machines operating on host machines that are not VXLAN-compatible.
  • 13. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9, wherein the identified managed forwarding elements operate in virtualization software of host machines located in the particular datacenter, wherein data compute nodes that logically connect to the logical L2 network operate on the virtualization software of the host machines.
  • 14. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9, wherein the selected managed forwarding element uses the bridge configuration to (i) bridge data packets sent from a first set of data compute nodes that are connected to the logical L2 network and execute in at least two of the plurality of datacenters to destinations in the physical L2 network and (ii) bridge data packets sent from sources in the physical L2 network to a second set of DCNs that are connected to the logical L2 network and execute in at least two of the plurality of datacenters.
  • 15. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 14, wherein to bridge a data packet sent from a data compute node connected to the logical L2 network to a destination in the physical L2 network, the selected managed forwarding element (i) receives a data packet sent by a data compute node connected to the logical L2 network, the data packet having a destination address of a data compute node connected to the physical L2 network, (ii) removes a logical network identifier from the data packet, and (iii) adds a physical network identifier to the data packet.
  • 16. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 14, wherein to bridge a data packet sent from a source in the physical L2 network to a DCN connected to the logical L2 network, the selected managed forwarding element (i) receives a data packet sent by a data compute node connected to the physical L2 network, the data packet having a destination address of a data compute node connected to the logical L2 network, (ii) removes a physical network identifier from the data packet, and (iii) adds a logical network identifier to the data packet.
CLAIM OF BENEFIT TO PRIOR APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/813,121, filed Nov. 14, 2017, now published as U.S. Patent Publication 2019/0149358. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/813,121, now published as U.S. Patent Publication 2019/0149358, is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (395)
Number Name Date Kind
5504921 Dev et al. Apr 1996 A
5550816 Hardwick et al. Aug 1996 A
5751967 Raab et al. May 1998 A
6006275 Picazo et al. Dec 1999 A
6104699 Holender et al. Aug 2000 A
6219699 McCloghrie et al. Apr 2001 B1
6359909 Ito et al. Mar 2002 B1
6456624 Eccles et al. Sep 2002 B1
6493767 Shida et al. Dec 2002 B1
6512745 Abe et al. Jan 2003 B1
6539432 Taguchi et al. Mar 2003 B1
6631137 Lorrain et al. Oct 2003 B1
6640251 Wiget et al. Oct 2003 B1
6680934 Cain Jan 2004 B1
6785843 McRae et al. Aug 2004 B1
6941487 Balakrishnan et al. Sep 2005 B1
6950428 Horst et al. Sep 2005 B1
6963585 Pennec et al. Nov 2005 B1
6999454 Crump Feb 2006 B1
7046630 Abe et al. May 2006 B2
7197572 Matters et al. Mar 2007 B2
7200144 Terrell et al. Apr 2007 B2
7209439 Rawlins et al. Apr 2007 B2
7215637 Ferguson et al. May 2007 B1
7260648 Tingley et al. Aug 2007 B2
7283473 Arndt et al. Oct 2007 B2
7339929 Zelig et al. Mar 2008 B2
7342916 Das et al. Mar 2008 B2
7391771 Orava et al. Jun 2008 B2
7450598 Chen et al. Nov 2008 B2
7463579 Lapuh et al. Dec 2008 B2
7478173 Delco Jan 2009 B1
7555002 Arndt et al. Jun 2009 B2
7590114 Bishara Sep 2009 B1
7606260 Oguchi et al. Oct 2009 B2
7643488 Khanna et al. Jan 2010 B2
7649851 Takashige et al. Jan 2010 B2
7710874 Balakrishnan et al. May 2010 B2
7760735 Chen et al. Jul 2010 B1
7764599 Doi et al. Jul 2010 B2
7792987 Vohra et al. Sep 2010 B1
7802000 Huang et al. Sep 2010 B1
7818452 Matthews et al. Oct 2010 B2
7826482 Minei et al. Nov 2010 B1
7839847 Nadeau et al. Nov 2010 B2
7885276 Lin Feb 2011 B1
7936770 Frattura et al. May 2011 B1
7937438 Miller et al. May 2011 B1
7948986 Ghosh et al. May 2011 B1
7953865 Miller et al. May 2011 B1
7991859 Miller et al. Aug 2011 B1
7995483 Bayar et al. Aug 2011 B1
8027354 Portolani et al. Sep 2011 B1
8031633 Bueno et al. Oct 2011 B2
8046456 Miller et al. Oct 2011 B1
8054832 Shukla et al. Nov 2011 B1
8055789 Richardson et al. Nov 2011 B2
8060875 Lambeth Nov 2011 B1
8131852 Miller et al. Mar 2012 B1
8149737 Metke et al. Apr 2012 B2
8155028 Abu-Hamdeh et al. Apr 2012 B2
8166201 Richardson et al. Apr 2012 B2
8190767 Maufer et al. May 2012 B1
8194674 Pagel et al. Jun 2012 B1
8199750 Schultz et al. Jun 2012 B1
8223668 Allan et al. Jul 2012 B2
8224931 Brandwine et al. Jul 2012 B1
8224971 Miller et al. Jul 2012 B1
8239572 Brandwine et al. Aug 2012 B1
8265075 Pandey Sep 2012 B2
8281067 Stolowitz Oct 2012 B2
8312129 Miller et al. Nov 2012 B1
8320388 Louati et al. Nov 2012 B2
8339959 Moisand et al. Dec 2012 B1
8339994 Gnanasekaran et al. Dec 2012 B2
8341626 Gardner et al. Dec 2012 B1
8351418 Zhao et al. Jan 2013 B2
8370834 Edwards et al. Feb 2013 B2
8401024 Christensen et al. Mar 2013 B2
8456984 Ranganathan et al. Jun 2013 B2
8504718 Wang et al. Aug 2013 B2
8565108 Marshall et al. Oct 2013 B1
8611351 Gooch et al. Dec 2013 B2
8611352 Mizrahi et al. Dec 2013 B2
8612627 Brandwine Dec 2013 B1
8625594 Saflai et al. Jan 2014 B2
8625603 Ramakrishnan et al. Jan 2014 B1
8625616 Vobbilisetty et al. Jan 2014 B2
8627313 Edwards et al. Jan 2014 B2
8644188 Brandwine et al. Feb 2014 B1
8660129 Brendel et al. Feb 2014 B1
8761152 Rixner et al. Jun 2014 B2
8837281 Sultan et al. Sep 2014 B2
8848508 Moreno et al. Sep 2014 B2
8856518 Sridharan et al. Oct 2014 B2
8892706 Dalal Nov 2014 B1
8923155 Qu et al. Dec 2014 B2
8958298 Zhang et al. Feb 2015 B2
8989183 Bansal et al. Mar 2015 B2
9008097 Bloch et al. Apr 2015 B2
9059999 Koponen et al. Jun 2015 B2
9137052 Koponen et al. Sep 2015 B2
9225636 Krishnan et al. Dec 2015 B2
9246821 Li et al. Jan 2016 B1
9306837 Jain et al. Apr 2016 B1
9407450 Singh Aug 2016 B2
9413644 Agarwal et al. Aug 2016 B2
9448821 Wang Sep 2016 B2
9575782 Chandrashekhar et al. Feb 2017 B2
9628294 Brandwine et al. Apr 2017 B1
9686180 Chu et al. Jun 2017 B2
9768980 Subramaniyam et al. Sep 2017 B2
9785455 Chandrashekhar et al. Oct 2017 B2
9893988 Agarwal et al. Feb 2018 B2
9910686 Chandrashekhar et al. Mar 2018 B2
9977685 Chandrashekhar et al. May 2018 B2
10020960 Wang et al. Jul 2018 B2
10225184 Agarwal et al. Mar 2019 B2
10250443 Chandrashekhar et al. Apr 2019 B2
10348625 Agarwal et al. Jul 2019 B2
10361952 Agarwal et al. Jul 2019 B2
10374827 Wang et al. Aug 2019 B2
10511458 Subramaniyam et al. Dec 2019 B2
10511459 Sharma et al. Dec 2019 B2
10528373 Chandrashekhar et al. Jan 2020 B2
10587514 Singh et al. Mar 2020 B1
10693783 Agarwal et al. Jun 2020 B2
11029982 Chandrashekhar et al. Jun 2021 B2
11050666 Agarwal et al. Jun 2021 B2
20010043614 Viswanadham et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020013858 Anderson Jan 2002 A1
20020093952 Gonda Jul 2002 A1
20020194369 Rawlins et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030026258 Takatani et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030026271 Erb et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030041170 Suzuki Feb 2003 A1
20030058850 Rangarajan et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030069972 Yoshimura et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030093481 Mitchell et al. May 2003 A1
20040054799 Meier et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073659 Rajsic et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040098505 Clemmensen May 2004 A1
20040267866 Carollo et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050018669 Arndt et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050025179 McLaggan et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050027881 Figueira et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050053079 Havala Mar 2005 A1
20050083953 May Apr 2005 A1
20050120160 Plouffe et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050132044 Guingo et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050182853 Lewites et al. Aug 2005 A1
20060002370 Rabie et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060026225 Canali et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060029056 Perera et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060056412 Page Mar 2006 A1
20060092940 Ansari et al. May 2006 A1
20060092976 Lakshman et al. May 2006 A1
20060174087 Hashimoto et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060187908 Shimozono et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060193266 Siddha et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060291388 Amdahl et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070008981 Pathan Jan 2007 A1
20070043860 Pabar Feb 2007 A1
20070061492 Riel Mar 2007 A1
20070064673 Bhandaru et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070097948 Boyd et al. May 2007 A1
20070140128 Klinker et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156919 Potti et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070201357 Smethurst et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070201490 Mahamuni Aug 2007 A1
20070286209 Wang et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070297428 Bose et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080002579 Lindholm et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080002683 Droux et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080008148 Sagawa Jan 2008 A1
20080013474 Nagarajan et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080049621 McGuire et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049646 Lu Feb 2008 A1
20080059556 Greenspan et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080069107 Sofia et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071900 Hecker et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080072305 Casado et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080086726 Griffith et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080151893 Nordmark et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080159301 Heer Jul 2008 A1
20080181243 Vobbilisetty et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080189769 Casado et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080225853 Melman et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080240122 Richardson et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080253366 Zuk et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080291910 Tadimeti et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080298274 Takashige et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090031041 Clemmensen Jan 2009 A1
20090043823 Iftode et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090083445 Ganga Mar 2009 A1
20090092043 Lapuh et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090092137 Haigh et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090122710 Bar-Tor et al. May 2009 A1
20090129271 Ramankutty et al. May 2009 A1
20090144403 Sajassi et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090150521 Tripathi Jun 2009 A1
20090150527 Tripathi et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090161547 Riddle et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090235325 Dimitrakos et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090249470 Litvin et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090249473 Cohn Oct 2009 A1
20090279536 Unbehagen et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090287848 Kamura et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090292858 Lambeth et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090300210 Ferris Dec 2009 A1
20090303880 Maltz et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100020726 Chu et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100046531 Louati et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100107162 Edwards et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100131636 Suri et al. May 2010 A1
20100153554 Anschutz et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100153701 Shenoy et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100165877 Shukla et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100169467 Shukla et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100192225 Ma et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100205479 Akutsu et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100208615 Soon et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100214949 Smith et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100257263 Casado et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100275199 Smith et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100287548 Zhou et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100290485 Martini et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110016215 Wang Jan 2011 A1
20110022695 Dalal et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110032830 Merwe et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110035494 Pandey et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110075664 Lambeth et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110075667 Li et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110075674 Li et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110085557 Gnanasekaran et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110085559 Chung et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110103259 Aybay et al. May 2011 A1
20110119748 Edwards et al. May 2011 A1
20110134931 Merwe et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110142053 Merwe et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110194567 Shen Aug 2011 A1
20110202920 Takase Aug 2011 A1
20110205931 Zhou et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110225207 Subramanian et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110261825 Ichino Oct 2011 A1
20110264610 Armstrong et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110283017 Alkhatib et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110292939 Subramaian et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110299534 Koganti et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110299537 Saraiya et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110310899 Alkhatib et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110317703 Dunbar et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110320577 Bhat et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120008528 Dunbar et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120014386 Xiong et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120014387 Dunbar et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120017022 Corrigan et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120079478 Galles et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120131643 Cheriton May 2012 A1
20120158997 Hsu et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120182992 Cowart et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120189009 Shekhar et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120236734 Sampath et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120291024 Barabash et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120307826 Matsuoka Dec 2012 A1
20120323987 Cantu et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130007740 Kikuchi et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130010600 Jocha et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130016723 Arad et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130031233 Feng et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130034094 Cardona et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130044629 Biswas et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130044636 Koponen et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130044641 Koponen et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130044751 Casado et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130054761 Kempf et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130058346 Sridharan et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130073743 Ramasamy et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130097345 Munoz et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130103817 Koponen et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130121209 Padmanabhan et al. May 2013 A1
20130124750 Anumala et al. May 2013 A1
20130125112 Mittal et al. May 2013 A1
20130136126 Wang et al. May 2013 A1
20130142048 Gross, IV et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130145002 Kannan et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130145008 Kannan et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130148541 Zhang et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130148542 Zhang et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130148543 Koponen et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130148656 Zhang et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130151661 Koponen et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130151676 Thakkar et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130151685 Bursell Jun 2013 A1
20130170490 Kreeger et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130182574 So et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130227550 Weinstein et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130227566 Higuchi et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130266015 Qu et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130266019 Qu et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130268588 Chang et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130297768 Singh Nov 2013 A1
20130301553 Klein Nov 2013 A1
20130318219 Kancherla Nov 2013 A1
20130322453 Mian Dec 2013 A1
20130329548 Nakil et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130332602 Nakil et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130332619 Xie et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130332983 Koorevaar et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130339544 Mithyantha Dec 2013 A1
20140006585 Dunbar et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140019639 Ueno Jan 2014 A1
20140025779 Matsumoto Jan 2014 A1
20140036730 Nellikar et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140036924 Christenson Feb 2014 A1
20140050091 Biswas et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140056298 Vobbilisetty et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140064276 Basso et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140068602 Gember et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140092901 Kapadia et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140092907 Sridhar et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140112343 Lambeth et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140115578 Cooper et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140115584 Mudigonda et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140123211 Wanser et al. May 2014 A1
20140140244 Kapadia et al. May 2014 A1
20140146817 Zhang May 2014 A1
20140169169 Almog et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140169215 Rajendran et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140169222 Cohen et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140195666 Dumitriu et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140201733 Benny et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140207930 Benny Jul 2014 A1
20140233567 Guo et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140241247 Kempf et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140269705 DeCusatis et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140269709 Benny et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140280738 Kolker et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140282889 Ishaya et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140294005 Jain et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140328343 Kapadia et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140334485 Jain et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140337497 Wanser et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140337500 Lee Nov 2014 A1
20140348166 Yang et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150010001 Duda et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150043576 Dixon et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150043581 Devireddy et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150058470 Duda Feb 2015 A1
20150058968 Wang et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150063353 Kapadia et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150082418 Gu Mar 2015 A1
20150100681 Reese et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150103661 Shen et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150103679 Tessmer et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150103839 Chandrashekhar et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150103842 Chandrashekhar et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150103843 Chandrashekhar et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150106804 Chandrashekhar et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150109923 Hwang Apr 2015 A1
20150117454 Koponen et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150124612 Schlansker et al. May 2015 A1
20150124817 Merchant et al. May 2015 A1
20150124821 Chu et al. May 2015 A1
20150124826 Edsall et al. May 2015 A1
20150200954 Gourlay et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150281042 Agarwal et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150281048 Agarwal et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150319009 Zhao Nov 2015 A1
20150334011 Zheng et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150372943 Hasan et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150381641 Cabrera et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160021032 Maier et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160057014 Thakkar et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160094364 Subramaniyam et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160094365 Subramaniyam Mar 2016 A1
20160094366 Wang et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160094396 Chandrashekhar Mar 2016 A1
20160218925 Mammen et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160226822 Zhang et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160330045 Tang et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170005918 Agarwal et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170005924 Agarwal et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170005942 Agarwal et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170141962 Britt et al. May 2017 A1
20170286158 Dai et al. Oct 2017 A1
20180167316 Agarwal et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180276013 Chandrashekhar et al. Sep 2018 A1
20190149357 Wang et al. May 2019 A1
20190149358 Sharma et al. May 2019 A1
20190207817 Chandrashekhar et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190280972 Agarwal et al. Sep 2019 A1
20200067730 Subramaniyam et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200081728 Chandrashekhar et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200296038 Agarwal et al. Sep 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (47)
Number Date Country
1929397 Mar 2007 CN
101232339 Jul 2008 CN
101808030 Aug 2010 CN
101816168 Aug 2010 CN
101822006 Sep 2010 CN
101953120 Jan 2011 CN
102347898 Feb 2012 CN
102549983 Jul 2012 CN
102571998 Jul 2012 CN
102577255 Jul 2012 CN
102780601 Nov 2012 CN
102801715 Nov 2012 CN
103141058 Jun 2013 CN
103379010 Oct 2013 CN
103491006 Jan 2014 CN
103890751 Jun 2014 CN
103905283 Jul 2014 CN
103957160 Jul 2014 CN
104025508 Sep 2014 CN
1653688 May 2006 EP
2566129 Mar 2013 EP
2648370 Oct 2013 EP
2003069609 Mar 2003 JP
2003124976 Apr 2003 JP
2003318949 Nov 2003 JP
2011171874 Sep 2011 JP
2012231382 Nov 2012 JP
2013175075 Sep 2013 JP
2014230217 Dec 2014 JP
20070050864 May 2007 KR
2005094008 Oct 2005 WO
2005112390 Nov 2005 WO
2008095010 Aug 2008 WO
2009045130 Apr 2009 WO
2012051884 Apr 2012 WO
2012093429 Jul 2012 WO
2013020126 Feb 2013 WO
2013026049 Feb 2013 WO
2013063330 May 2013 WO
2013074827 May 2013 WO
2013184846 Dec 2013 WO
2013185715 Dec 2013 WO
2015054671 Apr 2015 WO
2015147942 Oct 2015 WO
2016053372 Apr 2016 WO
2016053640 Apr 2016 WO
2017003957 Jan 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (21)
Entry
Mahalingam et al. “Virtual extensible Local Area Network (VXLAN): A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 Networks”, RFC 7348, Aug. 2014.
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 16/888,860, filed Jun. 1, 2020, 65 pages, Nicira, Inc.
Credle, Rufus, et al., “Implementing a VM-Aware Network Using VMready,” First Edition—IBM Redbooks, Aug. 2012, 256 pages, International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, NY.
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 16/680,432, filed Nov. 11, 2019, 113 pages, Nicira, Inc.
Aggarwal, R., et al., “Data Center Mobility based on E-VPN, BGP/MPLS IP VPN, IP Routing and NHRP,” draft-raggarwa-data-center-mobility-05.txt, Jun. 10, 2013, 24 pages, Internet Engineering Task Force, IETF, Geneva, Switzerland.
Caesar, Matthew, et al., “Design and Implementation of a Routing Control Platform,” NSDI '05: 2nd Symposium on Networked Systems Design & Implementation , Apr. 2005, 14 pages, Usenix Association.
Casado, Martin, et al., “Virtualizing the Network Forwarding Plane,” Dec. 2010, 6 pages.
Dobrescu, Mihai, et al., “RouteBricks: Exploiting Parallelism To Scale Software Routers,” SOSP'09, Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 22nd Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Oct. 2009, 17 pages, ACM, New York, NY.
Dumitriu, Dan Mihai, et al., (U.S. Appl. No. 61/514,990), filed Aug. 4, 2011, 31 pages.
Elmeleegy, Khaled, et al., “EtherProxy: Scaling Ethernet by Suppressing Broadcast Traffic,” IEEE INFOCOM 2009, Apr. 19, 2009, 9 pages, IEEE.
Kamath, Daya, et al., “Edge Virtual Bridge Proposal,” Version 0. Rev. 0.1, Apr. 23, 2010, 72 pages, IEEE.
Koponen, Teemu, et al., “Network Virtualization in Multi-tenant Datacenters,” Technical Report TR-2013-001E, Aug. 2013, 22 pages, VMware, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Narten, Thomas, et al., “Address Resolution Problems in Large Data Center Networks,” Jan. 2013, 17 pages, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 16/671,225, filed Nov. 1, 2019, 84 pages, Nicira, Inc.
Nygren, Anders, et al., “OpenFlow Switch Specification v.1.3.4 (Protocol version 0x04),” Mar. 27, 2014, 171 pages, Open Networking Foundation, Palo Alto, USA.
Rosen, E., “Applicability Statement for BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs),” RFC 4365, Feb. 2006, 32 pages, The Internet Society.
Shah, Himanshu, et al., “ARP Broadcast Reduction for Large Data Centers,” draft-shah-armd-arp- reduction-02.txt, Oct. 28, 2011, 11 pages, IETF Trust.
Shenker, Scott, et al., “The Future of Networking, and the Past of Protocols,” Dec. 2, 2011, 30 pages, USA.
Watsen, Kent, “Conditional Enablement of Configuiation Nodes,” Feb. 18, 2013, 8 pages, Internet Engineering Task Force Trust, Reston, USA.
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 17/341,317, filed Jun. 7, 2021, 112 pages, Nicira, Inc.
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 17/361,284, filed Jun. 28, 2021, 65 pages, Nicira, Inc.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200067732 A1 Feb 2020 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15813121 Nov 2017 US
Child 16673658 US