The present invention relates to the processing of signals obtained from a medical diagnostic apparatus, such as a pulse oximeter, using a digital filter to reduce noise effects.
A typical pulse oximeter measures two physiological parameters, percent oxygen saturation of arterial blood hemoglobin (SpO2 or sat) and pulse rate. Oxygen saturation can be estimated using various techniques. In one common technique, the photocurrent generated by the photo-detector is conditioned and processed to determine the ratio of modulation ratios (ratio of ratios) of the red to infrared signals. This modulation ratio has been observed to correlate well to arterial oxygen saturation. The pulse oximeters and sensors are empirically calibrated by measuring the modulation ratio over a range of in vivo measured arterial oxygen saturations (SaO2) on a set of patients, healthy volunteers, or animals. The observed correlation is used in an inverse manner to estimate blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) based on the measured value of modulation ratios of a patient. The estimation of oxygen saturation using modulation ratios is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,853,364, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ESTIMATING PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS USING MODEL-BASED ADAPTIVE FILTERING,” issued Dec. 29, 1998, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,911,167, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING OPTICAL PULSES,” issued Mar. 27, 1990. The relationship between oxygen saturation and modulation ratio is further described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,645,059, entitled “MEDICAL SENSOR WITH MODULATED ENCODING SCHEME,” issued Jul. 8, 1997. Most pulse oximeters extract the plethysmographic signal having first determined saturation or pulse rate, both of which are susceptible to interference.
A challenge in pulse oximetry is in analyzing the data to obtain a reliable measure of a physiologic parameter in the presence of large interference sources. Various solutions to this challenge have included methods that assess the quality of the measured parameter and decide on displaying the measured value when it is deemed reliable based upon a signal quality. Another approach involves a heuristic-based signal extraction technology, where the obtained signals are processed based on a series of guesses of the ratio, and which require the algorithm to start with a guess of the ratio, which is an unknown. Both the signal-quality determining and the heuristic signal extraction technologies are attempts at separating out a reliable signal from an unreliable one, one method being a phenomenological one and the other being a heuristic one.
A known approach for the reduction of noise in medical diagnostic devices including pulse oximeters involves the use of an adaptive filter, such as an adaptive digital filter. The adaptive filter is actually a data processing algorithm, and in most typical applications, the filter is a computer program that is executed by a central processor. As such, the filter inherently incorporates discrete-time measurement samples rather than continuous time inputs. A type of digital filter that is used in pulse oximeter systems is a Kalman filter. While conventional adaptive digital filters in general and Kalman filters in particular have been assimilated in medical diagnostics system to help reduce noise in a signal, there are still many challenges that need to be addressed to improve the techniques that are used to reduce noise effects in signals; noise effects such as those present in a medical diagnostic device. One of the shortcomings of using a Kalman filter is that a Kalman filter is an adaptive filter whose functioning is mathematically-based and where its aim is to compare the output of the filter with a desired output, and reduce the error in the comparison by continuously varying the filter's coefficients. So, a Kalman filter generates filter coefficients in an adaptive manner to minimize an error. While this method has been adopted by many, it is still a method that is somewhat blind regarding the signal that it is being filtered. Such an approach does not take into account the unique attributes that an input signal may possess and which are physiologically based. Another shortcoming of the Kalman filtering is that the Kalman filter is linear in its input-output relationship. One can appreciate that in certain conditions, the requirement that the filter be linear in its input-output relationship is too constraining. Yet another shortcoming of a Kalman filter is that filter parameters are continuously tuned, which can be computationally expensive.
There is therefore a need to develop a filter for reducing noise effects in signals that does not suffer form the above-mentioned constraints of conventional adaptive filters.
The present invention is directed towards methods and devices for reducing noise effects in a system for measuring a physiological parameter, including receiving an input signal; obtaining an assessment of the signal quality of the input signal; selecting coefficients for a digital filter using the assessment of signal quality; and filtering the input signal using the digital filter, without comparing the filter's output signal with the input signal.
In certain aspects, the filter coefficients are selected from a plurality of discrete preset values. In certain embodiments, the discrete and preset values are fixed or non-changing values. The digital filter can have either a linear or preferably a non-linear input-output relationship.
In pulse oximetry applications, the quality of the input signal may be assessed by obtaining or measuring signal parameters that include the skew of the time derivative of the signal; the correlation between signals from different wavelengths; the variation in signal amplitude, as well as others. Other assessments, such as maximum values or spectral peak frequencies, may also be used in determining filter parameters.
In some embodiments, the selection of filter parameters or coefficients is performed in real time, with the coefficients of the digital filter being determined using a current input sample. In certain other embodiments, the selection of filter parameters is performed using a previously stored input signal sample.
In pulse oximetry applications, the input signals can be a function of an oxygen saturation, or a pulse rate. Furthermore, these signals correspond with sensed optical energies from a plurality of wavelengths.
For a further understanding of the nature and advantages of the invention, reference should be made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The methods and systems in accordance with embodiments of the present invention are directed towards selecting and adjusting the parameters of a digital filter based an assessment of the quality of the input signals to the filter. The invention is particularly applicable to and will be explained by reference to measurements of oxygen saturation of hemoglobin in arterial blood and patient heart rate, as in pulse oximeter monitors and pulse oximetry sensors. However, it should be realized the invention is equally applicable to any generalized patient monitor and associated patient sensor, such as ECG, blood pressure, temperature, etc., and is not to be limited for use only with oximetry or pulse oximetry.
Sensor 100 is connected to a pulse oximeter 120. The oximeter includes a microprocessor 122 connected to an internal bus 124. Also connected to the bus is a RAM memory 126 and a display 128. A time processing unit (TPU) 130 provides timing control signals to light drive circuitry 132 which controls when light source 110 is illuminated, and if multiple light sources are used, the multiplexed timing for the different light sources. TPU 130 also controls the gating-in of signals from photodetector 114 through an amplifier 133 and a switching circuit 134. These signals are sampled at the proper time, depending upon which of multiple light sources is illuminated, if multiple light sources are used. The received signal is passed through an amplifier 136, a low pass filter 138, and an analog-to-digital converter 140. The digital data is then stored in a queued serial module (QSM) 142, for later downloading to RAM 126 as QSM 142 fills up. In one embodiment, there may be multiple parallel paths of separate amplifier filter and A/D converters for multiple light wavelengths or spectrums received.
Based on the value of the received signals corresponding to the light received by photodetector 114, microprocessor 122 will calculate the oxygen saturation using various algorithms. These algorithms require coefficients, which may be empirically determined, corresponding to, for example, the wavelengths of light used. These are stored in a ROM 146. In a two-wavelength system, the particular set of coefficients chosen for any pair of wavelength spectrums is determined by the value indicated by encoder 116 corresponding to a particular light source in a particular sensor 100. In one embodiment, multiple resistor values may be assigned to select different sets of coefficients. In another embodiment, the same resistors are used to select from among the coefficients appropriate for an infrared source paired with either a near red source or far red source. The selection between whether the near red or far red set will be chosen can be selected with a control input from control inputs 154. Control inputs 154 may be, for instance, a switch on the pulse oximeter, a keyboard, or a port providing instructions from a remote host computer. Furthermore, any number of methods or algorithms may be used to determine a patient's pulse rate, oxygen saturation or any other desired physiological parameter.
The brief description of an exemplary pulse oximeter set forth above, serves as a contextual fabric for describing the methods for reducing noise effects in the received signals according to embodiments of the present invention, which are described below. The embodiments of the present invention, which are used to reduce the noise effects in the signal using an assessment of the quality of the input signal, are described below in conjunction with the block diagram of
A signal quality indicator is a measured parameter that is capable of estimating the reliability and accuracy of a signal. For example, when measuring blood oxygen saturation using a pulse oximeter, a signal quality indicator is able to indirectly assess whether an estimate of a value of blood oxygen saturation is an accurate one. This determination of accuracy is made possible by a thorough and detailed study of volumes of measured values and various indicators to determine which indicators are indicative of signal quality and what, if any, is the correlation between the indicator and the accuracy of the estimated value.
In pulse oximetry, examples of signal quality indicators include the skew of the time derivative of the signal; the correlation between signals from different wavelengths; the variation in signal amplitude, as well as others. Other assessments, such as maximum values or spectral peak frequencies, may also be used in determining filter parameters. In addition to these signal quality indicators, other signal quality indicators may also be used for the selection of filter coefficients. In pulse oximetry, these additional signal quality indicators include: a signal measure indicative of the degree of similarity of an infrared and red waveforms; a signal measure indicative of a low light level; a signal measure indicative of an arterial pulse shape; a signal measure indicative of the high frequency signal component in the measure value; a signal measure indicative of a consistency of a pulse shape; a signal measure indicative of an arterial pulse amplitude; a signal measure indicative of modulation ratios of red to infrared modulations and a signal measure indicative of a period of an arterial pulse. These various indicators provide for an indirect assessments of the presence of known error sources in pulse oximetry measurements, which include optical interference between the sensor and the tissue location; light modulation by other than the patient's pulsatile tissue bed; physical movement of the patient and improper tissue-to-sensor positioning. These additional signal quality indicators are described in further detail in a co-pending US patent application entitled: “SIGNAL QUALITY METRICS DESIGN FOR QUALIFYING DATA FOR A PHYSIOLOGICAL MONITOR,” the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
In an alternate embodiment, the filter parameters are calculated using a buffer 212 of recent input samples. In addition, signal assessment criteria and filter parameters can also be held in storage 210 for reference or for use in the calculation of new values.
As set forth above, various signal quality indicators may be used to select filter parameters. Additionally, the selection of the filter parameters may be based on more than one signal quality indicator. Furthermore, the selection of the filter parameters may be based on the output of an algorithm that combines several signal quality indicators. In one embodiment in an oximeter system, the variance in the raw saturation value is used to determine the filter's smoothing coefficients. In this embodiment, the selection is achieved by comparing the variance in the raw sat signal to several thresholds, and the filter's smoothing coefficients are selected depending on which range the variance falls in.
In an alternate embodiment in an oximeter system used for average pulse estimation, the filter parameter selection algorithm uses a combination of various signal quality metrics, Z to select values for filter coefficients for the digital filter, where
Z=w1*SQ1+w2*SQ2+w3*SQ3,
where
Yet alternately, instead of using Z to select the filter coefficients, a non-linear function of Z can be used to select a coefficient or coefficients for the filter. In operation, the selection algorithm may first be tuned before it is fully implemented in a particular diagnostics system. The tuning of the selection algorithm(s) may be done manually using heuristic approaches. Alternately, the selection algorithm may be tuned statistically, in a manner similar to training a neural network.
Embodiments of the present invention offer several advantages over conventional adaptive filtering. It is known that conventional adaptive filtering seeks to optimize some output criterion by continuously tuning the coefficients in a linear filter. The approach as embodied by the present invention is advantageous over conventional adaptive filtering for the following reasons. First, filter parameters in accordance with embodiments of the present invention are selected by switching among several preset or fixed values, rather than being varied or tuned continuously. By switching the parameters of the digital filter among fixed, preset values, the embodiments of the present invention provide for computational savings and simplicity of implementation. Second, the parameters of the digital filter are selected based upon an assessment of the input signal received by the filter rather than by comparing the filter's output with its input. This too, provides for computational savings and simplicity of implementation. Third, the filter need not be a linear filter, that is the filter is not required to be linear in its input-output relationship. Since the filter in accordance with embodiments of the present invention is not constrained to be linear, the filter's design can correspond more to physiological than to mathematical requirements, as is the case with most conventional adaptive filtering schemes. This physiological-based filter parameter selection may be used to, for example, attenuate pulse amplitudes above a threshold, or respond more quickly to decreases than to increases in blood oxygen saturation.
Accordingly, as will be understood by those of skill in the art, the present invention which is related to reducing noise effects in a system for measuring a physiological parameter, may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the essential characteristics thereof. For example, signals indicative of any physiological parameter other than oxygen saturation, such as pulse rate, blood pressure, temperature, or any other physiological variable could be filtered using the techniques of the present invention. Moreover, many other indicators of the quality of the input signal can be used as a basis for the selection of the filter's coefficients. Further, while the present embodiments have been described in the time-domain, frequency-based methods are equally relevant to the embodiments of the present invention. Accordingly, the foregoing disclosure is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention, which is set forth in the following claims.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/341,722, filed Jan. 13, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,016,715 the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3638640 | Shaw | Feb 1972 | A |
4714341 | Hamaguri et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4805623 | Jöbsis | Feb 1989 | A |
4807631 | Hersh et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4833714 | Shimotani et al. | May 1989 | A |
4911167 | Corenman et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4913150 | Cheung et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4936679 | Mersch | Jun 1990 | A |
4938218 | Goodman et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4971062 | Hasebe et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4972331 | Chance | Nov 1990 | A |
4974591 | Awazu et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5028787 | Rosenthal et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5065749 | Hasebe et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5084327 | Stengel | Jan 1992 | A |
5119815 | Chance | Jun 1992 | A |
5122974 | Chance | Jun 1992 | A |
5167230 | Chance | Dec 1992 | A |
5190038 | Polson et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5246003 | DeLonzor | Sep 1993 | A |
5247931 | Norwood | Sep 1993 | A |
5263244 | Centa et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5275159 | Griebel | Jan 1994 | A |
5279295 | Martens et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5297548 | Pologe | Mar 1994 | A |
5355880 | Thomas et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5357965 | Hall et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5372136 | Steuer et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5385143 | Aoyagi | Jan 1995 | A |
5390670 | Centa et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5413099 | Schmidt et al. | May 1995 | A |
5469845 | DeLonzor et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5482036 | Diab et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483646 | Uchikoga | Jan 1996 | A |
5506798 | Shimada et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5553614 | Chance | Sep 1996 | A |
5564417 | Chance | Oct 1996 | A |
5575285 | Takanashi et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5594807 | Liu | Jan 1997 | A |
5611337 | Bukta | Mar 1997 | A |
5630413 | Thomas et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632272 | Diab et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645059 | Fein et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645060 | Yorkey | Jul 1997 | A |
5680857 | Pelikan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5692503 | Kuenstner | Dec 1997 | A |
5730124 | Yamauchi | Mar 1998 | A |
5758644 | Diab et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769785 | Diab et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779631 | Chance | Jul 1998 | A |
5782757 | Diab et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786592 | Hök | Jul 1998 | A |
5830136 | DeLonzor et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5830139 | Abreu | Nov 1998 | A |
5831598 | Kauffert et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842981 | Larsen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5871442 | Madarasz et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873821 | Chance et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5920263 | Huttenhoff et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5995855 | Kiani et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995856 | Mannheimer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995859 | Takahashi | Nov 1999 | A |
6011986 | Diab et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6052659 | Mermelstein | Apr 2000 | A |
6064898 | Aldrich | May 2000 | A |
6081742 | Amano et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088607 | Diab et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6120460 | Abreu | Sep 2000 | A |
6134460 | Chance | Oct 2000 | A |
6135952 | Coetzee | Oct 2000 | A |
6142942 | Clark | Nov 2000 | A |
6150951 | Olejniczak | Nov 2000 | A |
6154667 | Miura et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157850 | Diab et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163715 | Larsen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6181958 | Steuer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181959 | Schöllermann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6230035 | Aoyagi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6266546 | Steuer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285895 | Ristolainen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312393 | Abreu | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6353750 | Kimura et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6397091 | Diab et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6415236 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6419671 | Lemberg | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438399 | Kurth | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461305 | Schnall | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466809 | Riley | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487439 | Skladnev et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501974 | Huiku | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501975 | Diab et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6526301 | Larsen et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6544193 | Abreu | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6546267 | Sugiura et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549795 | Chance | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6580086 | Schulz et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591122 | Schmitt | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6594513 | Jobsis et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606509 | Schmitt | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6606511 | Ali et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615064 | Aldrich | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618042 | Powell | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622095 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6631281 | Kastle | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6654621 | Palatnik et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654624 | Diab et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658276 | Kianl et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6658277 | Wasserman | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6662030 | Khalil et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668183 | Hicks et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671526 | Aoyagi et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671528 | Steuer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678543 | Diab et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684090 | Ali et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6690958 | Walker et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697658 | Al-Ali | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6708048 | Chance | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711424 | Fine et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711425 | Reuss | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714245 | Ono | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6731274 | Powell | May 2004 | B2 |
6785568 | Chance | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6793654 | Lemberg | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801797 | Mannheimer et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6801798 | Geddes et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6801799 | Mendelson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6829496 | Nagai et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836235 | Asami | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6850053 | Daalmans et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863652 | Huang et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873865 | Steuer et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6889153 | Dietiker | May 2005 | B2 |
6898451 | Wuori | May 2005 | B2 |
6939307 | Dunlop | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6947780 | Scharf | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949081 | Chance | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6961598 | Diab | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6983178 | Fine et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993371 | Kiani et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996427 | Ali et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006856 | Baker, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7016715 | Stetson | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024235 | Melker et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027849 | Al-Ali | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027850 | Wasserman | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030749 | Al-Ali | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035697 | Brown | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7047056 | Hannula et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7060035 | Wasserman | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7110951 | Lemelson et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7127278 | Melker et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7162306 | Caby et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7209775 | Bae et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7236811 | Schmitt | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7263395 | Chan et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7272426 | Schmid | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7373193 | Al-Ali et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7392075 | Baker, Jr. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7474907 | Baker, Jr. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7496393 | Diab et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7519488 | Fu et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
20010005773 | Larsen et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010020122 | Steuer et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010039376 | Steuer et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044700 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020003832 | Siefert | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026106 | Khalil et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020034222 | Buchwald et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035318 | Mannheimer et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038079 | Steuer et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042558 | Mendelson | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045806 | Baker et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049389 | Abreu | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062071 | Diab et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020099282 | Knobbe et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111748 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128544 | Diab et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133068 | Huiku | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020156354 | Larson | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161287 | Schmitt | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161290 | Chance | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165439 | Schmitt | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198443 | Ting | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023140 | Chance | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030043925 | Stopler et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030053617 | Diethorn | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055324 | Wasserman | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060693 | Monfre et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069727 | Krasny et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030115061 | Chen | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030139687 | Abreu | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144584 | Mendelson | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030220548 | Schmitt | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220576 | Diab | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223489 | Smee et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010188 | Wasserman | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040054270 | Pewzner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040087846 | Wasserman | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107065 | Al-Ali | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127779 | Steuer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138538 | Stetson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040171920 | Mannheimer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176670 | Takamura et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176671 | Fine et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040230106 | Schmitt et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050049468 | Carlson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080323 | Kato | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101850 | Parker | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113651 | Wood et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113656 | Chance | May 2005 | A1 |
20050168722 | Forstner et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177034 | Beaumont | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192488 | Bryenton et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197552 | Baker, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203357 | Debreczeny et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228248 | Dietiker | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050267346 | Faber et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283059 | Iyer et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009688 | Lamego et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015021 | Cheng | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020181 | Schmitt | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030763 | Mannheimer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030766 | Stetson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052680 | Diab | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058683 | Chance | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064024 | Schnall | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060122476 | Van Slyke | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135860 | Baker, Jr. et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060195028 | Hannula et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224058 | Mannheimer | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247501 | Ali | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258921 | Addison et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070073120 | Li et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073124 | Li et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080255436 | Baker | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19640807 | Sep 1997 | DE |
1491135 | Dec 2004 | EP |
3170866 | Jul 1991 | JP |
3238813 | Oct 1991 | JP |
4332536 | Nov 1992 | JP |
7124138 | May 1995 | JP |
7136150 | May 1995 | JP |
10216115 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2003210438 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003275192 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004008572 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004113353 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004194908 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004248819 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004290545 | Oct 2004 | JP |
WO9309711 | May 1993 | WO |
WO9316629 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO9843071 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO0021438 | Apr 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wirnitzer, Bernhard, Adaptive Filters, A Matlab (Nano) Toolbox and Laboratory Exercises, ver. 1.0 Oct. 99, FH-Mannheim—Institut fur Digitale Signalverabeitung. |
Vincente, L.M., et al.; “Adaptive Pre-Processing of Photoplethysmographic Blood Volume Pulse Measurements,” pp. 114-117 (1996). |
Leahy, Martin J., et al.; “Sensor Validation in Biomedical Applications,” IFAC Modelling and Control in Biomedical Systems, Warwick, UK; pp. 221-226 (1997). |
Barreto, Armando B., et al.; “Adaptive LMS Delay Measurement in dual Blood Volume Pulse Signals for Non-Invasive Monitoring,” IEEE, pp. 117-120 (1997). |
Todd, Bryan, et al.; “The Identification of Peaks in Physiological Signals,” Computers and Biomedical Research, vol. 32, pp. 322-335 (1999). |
A. Johansson; “Neural network for photoplethysmographic respiratory rate monitoring,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, vol. 41, pp. 242-248 (2003). |
Lee, C.M., et al.; “Reduction of motion artifacts from photoplethysmographic recordings using wavelet denoising approach,” IEEE EMBS Asian-Pacific Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Oct. 20-22, 2003; pp. 194-195. |
Stetson, Paul F.; “Determining Heart Rate from Noisey Pulse Oximeter Signals Using Fuzzy Logic,” The IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, St. Louis, Missouri, May 25-28, 2003; pp. 1053-1058. |
Addison, Paul S., et al.; “A novel time-frequency-based 3D Lissajous figure method and its application to the determination of oxygen saturation from the photoplethysmogram,” Institute of Physic Publishing, Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 15, pp. L15-L18 (2004). |
Canadian Office Action for Application No. 2,512,579 dated May 30, 2012; 4 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060030766 A1 | Feb 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10341722 | Jan 2003 | US |
Child | 11247427 | US |