Selective absorbing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8081368
  • Patent Number
    8,081,368
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 29, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 20, 2011
    12 years ago
Abstract
An interference coating between a display and an intended viewing area that selectively absorbs incident optical energy in at least one first wavelength region and selectively transmits incident optical energy in at least one second wavelength region.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates in general to selective absorbing of light and more particularly concerns selective absorbing of light for rear-illuminated display systems, such as used in television or home cinema applications.


BACKGROUND

For background, reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 6,847,483.


SUMMARY

In general, in one aspect, an optical device includes a rear-illuminated display and an interference coating between the display and an intended viewing area that selectively absorbs incident optical energy in at least one first wavelength region and selectively transmits incident optical energy in at least one second wavelength region.


Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The first wavelength region may correspond to yellow light or cyan light. The second wavelength region may correspond to green light. The first wavelength region may have an average absorption of greater than 50%. The second wavelength region may have an average absorption less than 30%. The second wavelength region may have an average transmission of greater than 60% and the first wavelength region may optionally have an average transmission less than 40%. The average reflection may be less than 5% in the wavelength region between 540 and 560 nm and less than 10% in the wavelength region between 500 and 600 nm. The interference coating may further include an absorptive layer and may optionally include selective absorption in the absorptive layer. The absorptive layer may include a metal compound. The absorptive layer may include a Titanium nitride, Silicon nitride, or Zirconium nitride. The absorptive layer may include a metal. The absorptive layer may include Titanium, Niobium, Zirconium, Chromium, or Silicon. The rear-illuminated display may include a DMD light modulator, a transmissive-LCD light modulator, or an LCOS light modulator. The rear-illuminated display may include a UHP projection lamp or an LED projection lamp. The interference coating may be deposited on a substrate.


In general, in one aspect, an interference coating for use with a display that selectively absorbs incident optical energy in a predetermined number of first wavelength regions and selectively transmits incident optical energy in a predetermined number of second wavelength regions.


Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The interference coating comprises an absorptive layer. Selective absorption may occur in the absorptive layer.


In general, in one aspect, an optical device includes a rear-illuminated display with red, green, and blue emission regions and an interference coating between the display and an intended viewing area that selectively transmits in the wavelength regions that correspond to the red, green, and blue emission regions. The interference coating selectively absorbs in at least one other wavelength region.


Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The other wavelength region may correspond to at least yellow light or cyan light.


In general, in one aspect, an optical device includes a rear-illuminated display and an interference coating between the display and an intended viewing area that selectively absorbs incident optical energy in a plurality of absorption regions and selectively transmits incident optical energy in a plurality of transmission regions. The transmission regions are distinct from the absorption regions.


Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The absorption regions may correspond to yellow and cyan light. The transmission regions may correspond to blue, green, and red light.


In general, in one aspect, a method for increasing contrast ratio includes selectively absorbing ambient light in an interference coating placed between a rear-illuminated display and an intended viewing area, and transmitting light from the display through the interference coating to the intended viewing area.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING


FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing of a rear-illuminated display with a selective absorbing coating;



FIG. 2 is a table of an interference-coating optical design;



FIG. 3 is a graph of an interference-coating transmission;



FIG. 4 is a graph of an interference-coating absorption;



FIG. 5 is a graph of an interference-coating reflection; and



FIG. 6 is a graph of plasma and LCD display spectrums.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The cross-sectional views of the drawing are not drawn to scale. Some actual dimensions are as stated in the specification and figures.


Displays can be divided two general categories, front illuminated and rear illuminated, for use in, e.g., home cinema and business applications. Light modulators turn on and turn off pixels of pre-selected color spectral bands of visible light (e.g., red light, blue light, and green light) to form images on surfaces, e.g., display screens. Generally, front illuminated displays, such as front projectors, have a light source on the same side of the screen as the viewer and illuminate a reflective display screen that reflects light into the viewer's eyes. Rear illuminated displays, such as rear-projection televisions and liquid-crystal flat-panel displays, have a light source on the opposite side of the screen from the viewer and illuminate a transmissive display screen to display an image that is viewed from the side of the screen that is opposite the light source. Rear-illuminated displays include flat-panel liquid crystal displays (LCD), flat-panel plasma displays, organic light emitting diode (OLED) displays, cathode ray tube (CRT) displays, and rear-projection displays that use light modulator technology such as digital micromirror devices (DMDs), transmissive LCD devices, or liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) devices.


The display produces monochromatic or color images by decoding received electronic signals and using the signals to independently vary the brightness of each pixel on the display as a function of time. Pixels may be fixed with specific colors or the colors of pixels may be changed depending on the type of display device. For color displays, the pixel colors are typically blue, green, and red. Blue pixels typically correspond to a wavelength region of approximately 450 to 480 nm. Green pixels typically correspond to a wavelength region of approximately 520 to 560 nm. Red pixels typically correspond to a wavelength region of approximately 600 to 640 nm. Ambient light is generally white and can be broken down into blue, cyan, green, yellow, and red wavelength regions. Cyan typically corresponds to a wavelength region of approximately 480 to 520 nm. Yellow typically corresponds to a wavelength region of approximately 560 to 600 nm.


Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown a schematic drawing of the components of a selective absorbing coating with a video display. A rear-illuminated video display 100 such as an LCD panel generates display light 102, which consists of narrow bands of blue, green, and red light. Display light 102 passes through a coating substrate 108, an interference coating 110, and is then perceived visually by a viewer 106 located in an intended viewing area 118. Display assembly 120 includes display 100, substrate 108, and interference coating 110. FIG. 1 shows coating 110 on the viewer side of substrate 108. Alternatively, coating 110 may be located on the side of substrate 108 that is opposite the viewer. Coating 110 may optionally be deposited directly on display 100, in which case there is no substrate 108. Ambient light 114 from sources such as room lighting and sunlight, represented by light source 112, consists of blue, cyan, green, yellow, and red light. Ambient light 114 passes through interference coating 110, and reflects off the display as reflected ambient light 116. Reflected ambient light 116 passes again through interference coating 110 and is then visually perceived by viewer 106 located in intended viewing area 118. The blue, green, and red wavelength regions of display light 102 and incident ambient light 114 selectively pass through coating 110. The cyan and yellow wavelength regions of incident ambient light 114 are selectively absorbed in coating 110 so that the intensity of these wavelength regions is reduced in reflected ambient light 116 compared to the light reflected in the blue, green and red bands. The reduced intensity of reflected ambient light 116 is indicated by a dotted line in FIG. 1.


The contrast ratio of display assembly 120 in the presence of substantial ambient light is defined as the visible intensity of the display light 102 divided by the visible intensity of the reflected ambient light 116. The contrast ratio is beneficially increased by the coating 110 because the visible intensity of the reflected ambient light is preferentially reduced by the selective absorption of coating 110.


The desired characteristics for a display assembly with a selective absorbing coating include high transmittance of the selective absorbing coating in the wavelength regions that are used for information display (e.g. blue, green, and red) and high absorbance for the wavelength regions that are present in the ambient light but not used for information display (e.g. cyan and yellow). It is also beneficial for the display assembly to have low reflectance of ambient light so that glare is minimized.


In some implementations, interference coating 110 is constructed from a multilayer interference coating which is an optical filter that can transmit, reflect, or absorb light depending on the wavelength. Multilayer interference coatings are constructed by depositing adjacent layers of different materials, wherein each layer of material has a different index-of-refraction (n) than the material of the adjacent layer or layers. Multilayer interference coatings operate by using constructive and destructive interference between incident light and light that reflects at various layer interferences. It is usually advantageous to maximize the difference in n between adjacent layers, so it is typical to use alternating layers of high n materials (such as TiO2, Nb2O5, or Ta2O5) and low n materials (such as SiO2) in adjacent layers. However, it is also possible to use materials with medium n (such as Al2O3), or to use two materials having a high n (or two materials having a low n) in adjacent layers. Further information on multilayer interference coatings can be found in Thin Film Optical Filters by H. A. MacLeod, ISBN 0750306882.


An interference coating can be mathematically calculated and designed with commercially available computer software such as TFCalc available from Software Spectra Inc. at Internet address www.tfcalc.com. The coating is designed to achieve the desired transmission, reflection, and absorption targets by selecting the layer thicknesses and materials such that ambient light is selectively absorbed in certain wavelength regions e.g. cyan and yellow while light from the display is selectively transmitted in certain wavelength regions, e.g. red, green, and blue. Reflection is generally undesirable for rear-illuminated displays and is minimized by setting low reflection targets during the design process.


Referring to FIG. 2, there is shown a table of an optical design for one implementation of interference coating 110. The optical design includes alternating layers of TiO2 and SiO2 in adjacent layers. The thickness of each layer is shown in nanometers. Layer 22 is an optically absorptive layer of Titanium metal. The thickness of each layer of the multilayer interference coating in FIG. 2 is designed to maximize selective absorption of the cyan and yellow wavelength regions. The absorption takes place in the absorptive material of layer 22.


The absorptive material used in interference coating 110 may be an environmentally durable metal such as Titanium, Niobium, Zirconium, Chromium, or Silicon or it may be an environmentally durable compound such as Titanium nitride, Silicon nitride, or Zirconium nitride. Although some of these materials are conventionally considered to be reflective materials, they may also exhibit high absorption when combined together with other layers in an interference coating.


Interference coating 110 may be manufactured by sputtering, physical vapor deposition, or other optical coating processes. The coating process may be a batch process or a roll-coating process. Substrate 108 may be a rigid substrate such as glass or plastic sheet or it may be a flexible material such as plastic film. Coating 110 may also be deposited directly on the front surface of display 100 or within display 100. The dimensions of coating 110 will usually match the dimensions of the display or be slightly smaller if a bezel covers the edge of the display. The diagonal size of the display may be as small as 2 to 10 cm for portable devices or as large as 2.5 m or larger for wall-mounted video displays.


Referring to FIG. 3, curve 300 shows a graphical representation of the transmittance of the coating design described in FIG. 2. The vertical axis represents the transmittance of the interference coating of FIG. 2 and the horizontal axis represents the wavelength of the light transmitted through the coating. In this implementation, the blue wavelength region is 450 to 490 nm, the green wavelength region is 540 to 560 nm, and the red wavelength region is 620 to 650 nm. The average of an optical property such as transmittance can be calculated for a wavelength region of the coating. The average within the region is defined by adding the transmittance values within the region and dividing by the number of values. The average transmittance in each of the blue, green, and red wavelength regions is approximately 70% for the implementation of FIG. 2. The average transmittance should be higher than approximately 60% to allow visible light to transmit through the coating to the viewer. The transition region occurs between the wavelength that corresponds to 90% of the maximum value of the transmission region and the wavelength that corresponds to 110% of the minimum value of the blocking region adjacent to the transmission region. In general, a small transition region is desirable to help maximize the transmission of the coating design.


Referring to FIG. 4, curve 400 shows a graphical representation of the absorbance of the coating design described in FIG. 2. For an optical coating that has a small amount of scattered light, the absorbance (in percent) is defined as 100 minus transmittance minus reflectance. In this implementation, the cyan wavelength region is 505 to 525 nm and the yellow wavelength region is 575 to 605 nm. The average absorbance in each of the cyan and yellow wavelength regions is approximately 55 to 60%. The average absorbance should be higher than approximately 50% to absorb the cyan and yellow bands of light and thus raise the contrast ratio. The transition region is defined for absorption similar to the definition for transmission.


The reflectance of ambient light by the selective absorbing coating should be small to reduce glare and visible reflections of the surrounding environment at the surface of the display assembly. The reflectance of the display light by the selective absorbing coating should also be small to avoid ghosting issues from light that is reflected back into the display and then reflected back out to the viewer. Referring to FIG. 5, curve 500 shows a graphical representation of the reflectance of the coating design described in FIG. 2. The average reflectance is less than 5% in the green wavelength region between 540 and 560 nm and less than 10% in the wavelength region between 500 and 600 nm, which includes the colors of green, yellow, and orange. The wavelength region between 540 and 560 is at the peak of the optical sensitivity of the human eye, so minimum reflectance is desirable in that wavelength region. The wavelength region between 500 and 600 nm covers most of the wavelength region that the human eye can perceive with high sensitivity so it is also desirable to minimize the reflection in this wavelength region. The wavelength regions outside of 500 to 600 nm do not contribute substantially to visible reflection, so the allowable reflection from the coating can be higher than within the 500 to 600 nm region.


The interference coating of FIG. 2 may be incorporated internally to the display device rather than on the front surface. The details of incorporation will depend on the type of display device. For example, with an LCD flat panel display, the interference coating 110 may be deposited on an interior glass or plastic surface rather than on the front surface. The interference coating 110 may be adhesively bonded such that the coating is immersed in materials with an index-of-refraction of approximately 1.5 such as conventional glass or plastic materials that are usually used for optical purposes. The adhesive may be a pressure-sensitive adhesive, ultraviolet-cure adhesive, or any optically transparent adhesive. The index-of-refraction of the adhesive is generally chosen to match the other optical materials so that there is minimal reflection between the adhesive and the other optical materials. The index-of-refraction of the adhesive may be approximately 1.5. The transmittance of FIG. 3, absorbance of FIG. 4, and reflectance of FIG. 5 is calculated for a coating that is immersed in materials and adhesives that have an index-of-refraction of 1.5.


Referring to FIG. 6, curve 600 shows a graphical representation of a typical plasma-display optical spectrum and curve 602 shows a typical LCD-display optical spectrum. The optical spectrum shows the normalized intensity as a function of wavelength. The coating design described in FIG. 2 has its transmissive regions matched to the blue, green, and red wavelength bands of the plasma and LCD displays shown in FIG. 6. The selective absorbing coating may be used with various rear-illuminated displays such as flat-panel liquid crystal displays (LCD), flat-panel plasma displays, organic light emitting diode (OLED) displays, cathode ray tube (CRT) displays, and rear-projection displays that use light modulator technology such as digital micromirror devices (DMDs), transmissive LCD devices, or liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) devices. The rear-projection displays may use projection lamps based on various sources such as ultra-high-performance (UHP) lamps, xenon lamps, light emitting diodes (LEDs), or lasers. The color pixels in the displays may be produced by various technologies such as fixed color filters, color wheels, sequentially-timed light sources, or separate red, green, and blue light sources. By varying the layer thicknesses and materials, the transmission regions of the coating may be adjusted to match the emission wavelengths of the display. The absorption regions of the selective absorbing coating may be designed to match the regions between the emission regions of the display. The spectrum of a display device may be different depending on the backlight source. For example, LCD displays may have fluorescent backlights or may have LED backlights. Other display technologies may be used such as surface-conduction electron-emitter displays (SEDs), organic LEDs (OLEDs) or other rear-illuminated displays not specifically mentioned here.


Conventional methods of increasing display contrast utilize colored materials such as intrinsically colored glass or plastic. Interference coatings are advantageous because interference coatings can be mathematically and predictably designed to absorb in arbitrary wavelength regions and to have arbitrarily small transition regions in the spectral curves whereas intrinsically colored materials have their wavelength regions and the size of their transition regions limited by the chemistry of the colored materials.


In some implementations, a monochromatic display, or black and white display may be used. The selective absorbing filter may than be designed so that it matches the single band of light from the display rather than the multiple bands of light that are used in a color display.


It is evident that those skilled in the art may now make numerous uses and modifications of and departures from the specific apparatus and techniques herein disclosed without departing from the inventive concepts. Consequently, the invention is to be construed as embracing each and every novel feature and novel combination of features present in or possessed by the apparatus and techniques herein disclosed and limited solely by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An optical device comprising: a rear-illuminated display; andan interference coating between the rear-illuminated display and an intended viewing area that selectively absorbs an incident optical energy in at least one first wavelength region of the visible spectrum and selectively transmits at least 50% of the incident optical energy in at least one second wavelength region of the visible spectrum.
  • 2. An optical device in accordance with claim 1, wherein the first wavelength region corresponds to yellow light.
  • 3. An optical device in accordance with claim 1, wherein the first wavelength region corresponds to cyan light.
  • 4. An optical device in accordance with claim 1, wherein the second wavelength region corresponds to green light.
  • 5. An optical device in accordance with claim 1, wherein the first wavelength region has an average absorption of greater than 50%.
  • 6. An optical device in accordance with claim 5, wherein the second wavelength region has an average absorption less than 30%.
  • 7. An optical device in accordance with claim 1, wherein the second wavelength region has an average transmission of greater than 60%.
  • 8. An optical device in accordance with claim 7, wherein the first wavelength region has an average transmission less than 40%.
  • 9. An optical device in accordance with claim 1, wherein the average reflection is less than 5% in the wavelength region between 540 and 560 nm and less than 10% in the wavelength region between 500 and 600 nm.
  • 10. An optical device in accordance with claim 1, wherein the interference coating comprises an absorptive layer.
  • 11. An optical device in accordance with claim 10, wherein selective absorption occurs in the absorptive layer.
  • 12. An optical device in accordance with claim 10, wherein the absorptive layer comprises a metal compound.
  • 13. An optical device in accordance with claim 12, wherein the absorptive layer comprises a material chosen from the group consisting of Titanium nitride, Silicon nitride, and Zirconium nitride.
  • 14. An optical device in accordance with claim 10, wherein the absorptive layer comprises a metal.
  • 15. An optical device in accordance with claim 14, wherein the absorptive layer comprises a material chosen from the group consisting of Titanium, Niobium, Zirconium, Chromium, and Silicon.
  • 16. An optical device in accordance with claim 1, wherein the rear-illuminated display comprises a DMD light modulator.
  • 17. An optical device in accordance with claim 1, wherein the rear-illuminated display comprises a transmissive-LCD light modulator.
  • 18. An optical device in accordance with claim 1, wherein the rear-illuminated display comprises an LCOS light modulator.
  • 19. An optical device in accordance with claim 1, wherein the rear-illuminated display comprises a UHP projection lamp.
  • 20. An optical device in accordance with claim 1, wherein the rear-illuminated display comprises an LED projection lamp.
  • 21. An optical system in accordance with claim 1 wherein the interference coating is deposited on a substrate.
  • 22. An interference coating for use with a display that selectively absorbs incident optical energy in a predetermined number of first wavelength regions in the visible spectrum and selectively transmits at least 50% of the incident optical energy in a predetermined number of second wavelength regions in the visible spectrum.
  • 23. An interference coating in accordance with claim 22, wherein the interference coating comprises an absorptive layer.
  • 24. An interference coating in accordance with claim 23, wherein selective absorption occurs in the absorptive layer.
  • 25. An optical device comprising: a rear-illuminated display; andan interference coating between the rear-illuminated display and an intended viewing area that selectively absorbs an incident optical energy in a plurality of absorption wavelength regions and selectively transmits at least 50% of the incident optical energy in a plurality of transmission wavelength regions, the transmission regions distinct from the absorption regions.
  • 26. An optical device in accordance with claim 25, wherein the absorption regions correspond to yellow and cyan light.
  • 27. An optical device in accordance with claim 26, wherein the transmission regions correspond to blue, green, and red light.
  • 28. An optical device in accordance with claim 25, wherein the transmission regions correspond to blue, green, and red light.
US Referenced Citations (110)
Number Name Date Kind
1998054 McBurney Apr 1935 A
2590906 Tripp Apr 1952 A
3314742 Morgan Apr 1967 A
3556640 Austin Jan 1971 A
3712708 Brown Jan 1973 A
3942869 Portner et al. Mar 1976 A
RE29091 De Palma et al. Dec 1976 E
4190320 Ferro Feb 1980 A
4206969 Cobb Jun 1980 A
4979803 McGuckin et al. Dec 1990 A
5148309 Yamada et al. Sep 1992 A
5164858 Aguilera et al. Nov 1992 A
5193015 Shanks Mar 1993 A
5214530 Coombs et al. May 1993 A
5335022 Braun et al. Aug 1994 A
5361163 Matsuda et al. Nov 1994 A
5383995 Phillips et al. Jan 1995 A
5389982 Lee Feb 1995 A
5400174 Pagis et al. Mar 1995 A
5416617 Loiseaux May 1995 A
5473469 Magocs et al. Dec 1995 A
5486884 DeVaan Jan 1996 A
5521759 Dobrowolski et al. May 1996 A
5568316 Schrenk et al. Oct 1996 A
5625494 Fukushima et al. Apr 1997 A
5646781 Johnson, Jr. Jul 1997 A
5715083 Takayama Feb 1998 A
5726805 Kaushik et al. Mar 1998 A
5731898 Orzi et al. Mar 1998 A
5739296 Gvon et al. Apr 1998 A
5760954 Tatsuki et al. Jun 1998 A
5768019 Niwa et al. Jun 1998 A
5832146 Bruno Nov 1998 A
5875012 Crawford et al. Feb 1999 A
5880800 Mikura et al. Mar 1999 A
5914817 Browning et al. Jun 1999 A
6018419 Cobb, Jr. et al. Jan 2000 A
6023369 Goto Feb 2000 A
6031653 Wang Feb 2000 A
6072549 Faris et al. Jun 2000 A
6157486 Benson et al. Dec 2000 A
6163402 Chou et al. Dec 2000 A
6208463 Hansen et al. Mar 2001 B1
6215592 Pelekhaty Apr 2001 B1
6248448 Lippey et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249378 Shimamura et al. Jun 2001 B1
6282023 Bergman Aug 2001 B1
6284382 Ishikawa et al. Sep 2001 B1
6288172 Goetz et al. Sep 2001 B1
6288842 Krasa et al. Sep 2001 B1
6307675 Abe et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317189 Yuan et al. Nov 2001 B1
6339464 Anderson et al. Jan 2002 B1
6375330 Mihalakis Apr 2002 B1
6381068 Harada et al. Apr 2002 B1
6392766 Gnaedig et al. May 2002 B1
6414727 Benton Jul 2002 B1
6421174 Ooshima et al. Jul 2002 B1
6428169 Deter et al. Aug 2002 B1
6449089 Moshrefzadeh et al. Sep 2002 B1
6525877 Clabburn et al. Feb 2003 B1
6529322 Jones et al. Mar 2003 B1
6530667 Idaszak et al. Mar 2003 B1
6561654 Mukawa et al. May 2003 B2
6590710 Hara et al. Jul 2003 B2
6618199 Cook Sep 2003 B2
6643069 Dewald Nov 2003 B2
6650455 Miles Nov 2003 B2
6674562 Miles Jan 2004 B1
6680792 Miles Jan 2004 B2
6784608 Araki et al. Aug 2004 B2
6831784 Takeda et al. Dec 2004 B2
6847483 Lippey et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850365 Ishikawa Feb 2005 B2
6872497 Levinson et al. Mar 2005 B1
6894835 Ohsako et al. May 2005 B2
7035015 Teijido Apr 2006 B2
7040764 Przybyla et al. May 2006 B2
7054063 Shimoda May 2006 B2
7071907 Duboc et al. Jul 2006 B1
7090357 Magarill et al. Aug 2006 B2
7161737 Umeya Jan 2007 B2
7423809 Oshima et al. Sep 2008 B2
7435964 Lane et al. Oct 2008 B2
7570423 Willard Aug 2009 B2
7724434 Cross et al. May 2010 B2
20010011779 Stover Aug 2001 A1
20020015215 Miles Feb 2002 A1
20020024711 Miles Feb 2002 A1
20020063350 Matsumoto May 2002 A1
20020075555 Miles Jun 2002 A1
20020126364 Miles Sep 2002 A1
20020130994 Karman Sep 2002 A1
20030043157 Miles Mar 2003 A1
20030043346 Kwok et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030128430 Leu et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030156238 Hiraishi et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030156326 Lotz et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030156328 Goto et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030214632 Ma et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030227585 Chang et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040061935 Obsako Apr 2004 A1
20040196551 Chubachi et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040233524 Lippey Nov 2004 A1
20040240053 Shimoda Dec 2004 A1
20050030480 Lippey Feb 2005 A1
20050105176 Lippey May 2005 A1
20050207002 Liu et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050231800 Lippey Oct 2005 A1
20050241530 Bruckner et al. Nov 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (50)
Number Date Country
4442045 May 1996 DE
197 47 597 Aug 1998 DE
19901970 Aug 2000 DE
0 442 738 Feb 1991 EP
0 493 863 Jul 1992 EP
0 648 048 Oct 1994 EP
0 609 593 Feb 1995 EP
0833172 Apr 1998 EP
0 856 768 May 1998 EP
0 657 769 Mar 2000 EP
1 324 114 Jul 2003 EP
1324114 Jul 2003 EP
511 199 Aug 1939 GB
652 859 May 1951 GB
2161983 Jan 1986 GB
56047012 Apr 1981 JP
62178906 Aug 1987 JP
05011344 Jan 1993 JP
05216123 Aug 1993 JP
06148409 May 1994 JP
HEI 6-289491 Oct 1994 JP
07 270 915 Feb 1996 JP
08186849 Nov 1996 JP
H11-119002 Aug 1999 JP
2001-005412 Jan 2001 JP
2000-284908 Feb 2001 JP
2001 055646 Jun 2001 JP
2003-50306 Feb 2003 JP
2003-121637 Apr 2003 JP
2003-337381 Nov 2003 JP
2004-029163 Jan 2004 JP
2004038003 Feb 2004 JP
200461545 Feb 2004 JP
2004-101558 Apr 2004 JP
2004-117480 Apr 2004 JP
2004-138938 May 2004 JP
2004-144882 May 2004 JP
2004-144883 May 2004 JP
2004163806 Jun 2004 JP
2004170959 Jun 2004 JP
WO 9517690 Jun 1995 WO
9632663 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9836320 Aug 1998 WO
WO 0041009 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0045220 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0057214 Sep 2000 WO
WO 03050612 Jun 2003 WO
WO 03077027 Sep 2003 WO
WO 03077028 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2004031852 Apr 2004 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080239497 A1 Oct 2008 US