The present invention relates in general to selective absorbing of light and more particularly concerns selective absorbing of light for rear-illuminated display systems, such as used in television or home cinema applications.
For background, reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 6,847,483.
In general, in one aspect, an optical device includes a rear-illuminated display and an interference coating between the display and an intended viewing area that selectively absorbs incident optical energy in at least one first wavelength region and selectively transmits incident optical energy in at least one second wavelength region.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The first wavelength region may correspond to yellow light or cyan light. The second wavelength region may correspond to green light. The first wavelength region may have an average absorption of greater than 50%. The second wavelength region may have an average absorption less than 30%. The second wavelength region may have an average transmission of greater than 60% and the first wavelength region may optionally have an average transmission less than 40%. The average reflection may be less than 5% in the wavelength region between 540 and 560 nm and less than 10% in the wavelength region between 500 and 600 nm. The interference coating may further include an absorptive layer and may optionally include selective absorption in the absorptive layer. The absorptive layer may include a metal compound. The absorptive layer may include a Titanium nitride, Silicon nitride, or Zirconium nitride. The absorptive layer may include a metal. The absorptive layer may include Titanium, Niobium, Zirconium, Chromium, or Silicon. The rear-illuminated display may include a DMD light modulator, a transmissive-LCD light modulator, or an LCOS light modulator. The rear-illuminated display may include a UHP projection lamp or an LED projection lamp. The interference coating may be deposited on a substrate.
In general, in one aspect, an interference coating for use with a display that selectively absorbs incident optical energy in a predetermined number of first wavelength regions and selectively transmits incident optical energy in a predetermined number of second wavelength regions.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The interference coating comprises an absorptive layer. Selective absorption may occur in the absorptive layer.
In general, in one aspect, an optical device includes a rear-illuminated display with red, green, and blue emission regions and an interference coating between the display and an intended viewing area that selectively transmits in the wavelength regions that correspond to the red, green, and blue emission regions. The interference coating selectively absorbs in at least one other wavelength region.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The other wavelength region may correspond to at least yellow light or cyan light.
In general, in one aspect, an optical device includes a rear-illuminated display and an interference coating between the display and an intended viewing area that selectively absorbs incident optical energy in a plurality of absorption regions and selectively transmits incident optical energy in a plurality of transmission regions. The transmission regions are distinct from the absorption regions.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The absorption regions may correspond to yellow and cyan light. The transmission regions may correspond to blue, green, and red light.
In general, in one aspect, a method for increasing contrast ratio includes selectively absorbing ambient light in an interference coating placed between a rear-illuminated display and an intended viewing area, and transmitting light from the display through the interference coating to the intended viewing area.
The cross-sectional views of the drawing are not drawn to scale. Some actual dimensions are as stated in the specification and figures.
Displays can be divided two general categories, front illuminated and rear illuminated, for use in, e.g., home cinema and business applications. Light modulators turn on and turn off pixels of pre-selected color spectral bands of visible light (e.g., red light, blue light, and green light) to form images on surfaces, e.g., display screens. Generally, front illuminated displays, such as front projectors, have a light source on the same side of the screen as the viewer and illuminate a reflective display screen that reflects light into the viewer's eyes. Rear illuminated displays, such as rear-projection televisions and liquid-crystal flat-panel displays, have a light source on the opposite side of the screen from the viewer and illuminate a transmissive display screen to display an image that is viewed from the side of the screen that is opposite the light source. Rear-illuminated displays include flat-panel liquid crystal displays (LCD), flat-panel plasma displays, organic light emitting diode (OLED) displays, cathode ray tube (CRT) displays, and rear-projection displays that use light modulator technology such as digital micromirror devices (DMDs), transmissive LCD devices, or liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) devices.
The display produces monochromatic or color images by decoding received electronic signals and using the signals to independently vary the brightness of each pixel on the display as a function of time. Pixels may be fixed with specific colors or the colors of pixels may be changed depending on the type of display device. For color displays, the pixel colors are typically blue, green, and red. Blue pixels typically correspond to a wavelength region of approximately 450 to 480 nm. Green pixels typically correspond to a wavelength region of approximately 520 to 560 nm. Red pixels typically correspond to a wavelength region of approximately 600 to 640 nm. Ambient light is generally white and can be broken down into blue, cyan, green, yellow, and red wavelength regions. Cyan typically corresponds to a wavelength region of approximately 480 to 520 nm. Yellow typically corresponds to a wavelength region of approximately 560 to 600 nm.
Referring to
The contrast ratio of display assembly 120 in the presence of substantial ambient light is defined as the visible intensity of the display light 102 divided by the visible intensity of the reflected ambient light 116. The contrast ratio is beneficially increased by the coating 110 because the visible intensity of the reflected ambient light is preferentially reduced by the selective absorption of coating 110.
The desired characteristics for a display assembly with a selective absorbing coating include high transmittance of the selective absorbing coating in the wavelength regions that are used for information display (e.g. blue, green, and red) and high absorbance for the wavelength regions that are present in the ambient light but not used for information display (e.g. cyan and yellow). It is also beneficial for the display assembly to have low reflectance of ambient light so that glare is minimized.
In some implementations, interference coating 110 is constructed from a multilayer interference coating which is an optical filter that can transmit, reflect, or absorb light depending on the wavelength. Multilayer interference coatings are constructed by depositing adjacent layers of different materials, wherein each layer of material has a different index-of-refraction (n) than the material of the adjacent layer or layers. Multilayer interference coatings operate by using constructive and destructive interference between incident light and light that reflects at various layer interferences. It is usually advantageous to maximize the difference in n between adjacent layers, so it is typical to use alternating layers of high n materials (such as TiO2, Nb2O5, or Ta2O5) and low n materials (such as SiO2) in adjacent layers. However, it is also possible to use materials with medium n (such as Al2O3), or to use two materials having a high n (or two materials having a low n) in adjacent layers. Further information on multilayer interference coatings can be found in Thin Film Optical Filters by H. A. MacLeod, ISBN 0750306882.
An interference coating can be mathematically calculated and designed with commercially available computer software such as TFCalc available from Software Spectra Inc. at Internet address www.tfcalc.com. The coating is designed to achieve the desired transmission, reflection, and absorption targets by selecting the layer thicknesses and materials such that ambient light is selectively absorbed in certain wavelength regions e.g. cyan and yellow while light from the display is selectively transmitted in certain wavelength regions, e.g. red, green, and blue. Reflection is generally undesirable for rear-illuminated displays and is minimized by setting low reflection targets during the design process.
Referring to
The absorptive material used in interference coating 110 may be an environmentally durable metal such as Titanium, Niobium, Zirconium, Chromium, or Silicon or it may be an environmentally durable compound such as Titanium nitride, Silicon nitride, or Zirconium nitride. Although some of these materials are conventionally considered to be reflective materials, they may also exhibit high absorption when combined together with other layers in an interference coating.
Interference coating 110 may be manufactured by sputtering, physical vapor deposition, or other optical coating processes. The coating process may be a batch process or a roll-coating process. Substrate 108 may be a rigid substrate such as glass or plastic sheet or it may be a flexible material such as plastic film. Coating 110 may also be deposited directly on the front surface of display 100 or within display 100. The dimensions of coating 110 will usually match the dimensions of the display or be slightly smaller if a bezel covers the edge of the display. The diagonal size of the display may be as small as 2 to 10 cm for portable devices or as large as 2.5 m or larger for wall-mounted video displays.
Referring to
Referring to
The reflectance of ambient light by the selective absorbing coating should be small to reduce glare and visible reflections of the surrounding environment at the surface of the display assembly. The reflectance of the display light by the selective absorbing coating should also be small to avoid ghosting issues from light that is reflected back into the display and then reflected back out to the viewer. Referring to
The interference coating of
Referring to
Conventional methods of increasing display contrast utilize colored materials such as intrinsically colored glass or plastic. Interference coatings are advantageous because interference coatings can be mathematically and predictably designed to absorb in arbitrary wavelength regions and to have arbitrarily small transition regions in the spectral curves whereas intrinsically colored materials have their wavelength regions and the size of their transition regions limited by the chemistry of the colored materials.
In some implementations, a monochromatic display, or black and white display may be used. The selective absorbing filter may than be designed so that it matches the single band of light from the display rather than the multiple bands of light that are used in a color display.
It is evident that those skilled in the art may now make numerous uses and modifications of and departures from the specific apparatus and techniques herein disclosed without departing from the inventive concepts. Consequently, the invention is to be construed as embracing each and every novel feature and novel combination of features present in or possessed by the apparatus and techniques herein disclosed and limited solely by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1998054 | McBurney | Apr 1935 | A |
2590906 | Tripp | Apr 1952 | A |
3314742 | Morgan | Apr 1967 | A |
3556640 | Austin | Jan 1971 | A |
3712708 | Brown | Jan 1973 | A |
3942869 | Portner et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
RE29091 | De Palma et al. | Dec 1976 | E |
4190320 | Ferro | Feb 1980 | A |
4206969 | Cobb | Jun 1980 | A |
4979803 | McGuckin et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5148309 | Yamada et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5164858 | Aguilera et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5193015 | Shanks | Mar 1993 | A |
5214530 | Coombs et al. | May 1993 | A |
5335022 | Braun et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5361163 | Matsuda et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5383995 | Phillips et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5389982 | Lee | Feb 1995 | A |
5400174 | Pagis et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5416617 | Loiseaux | May 1995 | A |
5473469 | Magocs et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486884 | DeVaan | Jan 1996 | A |
5521759 | Dobrowolski et al. | May 1996 | A |
5568316 | Schrenk et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5625494 | Fukushima et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5646781 | Johnson, Jr. | Jul 1997 | A |
5715083 | Takayama | Feb 1998 | A |
5726805 | Kaushik et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5731898 | Orzi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5739296 | Gvon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5760954 | Tatsuki et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768019 | Niwa et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5832146 | Bruno | Nov 1998 | A |
5875012 | Crawford et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5880800 | Mikura et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5914817 | Browning et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6018419 | Cobb, Jr. et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023369 | Goto | Feb 2000 | A |
6031653 | Wang | Feb 2000 | A |
6072549 | Faris et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6157486 | Benson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163402 | Chou et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6208463 | Hansen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215592 | Pelekhaty | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6248448 | Lippey et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249378 | Shimamura et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6282023 | Bergman | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284382 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288172 | Goetz et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288842 | Krasa et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307675 | Abe et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317189 | Yuan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6339464 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6375330 | Mihalakis | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381068 | Harada et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392766 | Gnaedig et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6414727 | Benton | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421174 | Ooshima et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428169 | Deter et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449089 | Moshrefzadeh et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6525877 | Clabburn et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529322 | Jones et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530667 | Idaszak et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6561654 | Mukawa et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6590710 | Hara et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6618199 | Cook | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6643069 | Dewald | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650455 | Miles | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6674562 | Miles | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680792 | Miles | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6784608 | Araki et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6831784 | Takeda et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6847483 | Lippey et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850365 | Ishikawa | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6872497 | Levinson et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6894835 | Ohsako et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7035015 | Teijido | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7040764 | Przybyla et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054063 | Shimoda | May 2006 | B2 |
7071907 | Duboc et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7090357 | Magarill et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7161737 | Umeya | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7423809 | Oshima et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7435964 | Lane et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7570423 | Willard | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7724434 | Cross et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
20010011779 | Stover | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020015215 | Miles | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020024711 | Miles | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020063350 | Matsumoto | May 2002 | A1 |
20020075555 | Miles | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020126364 | Miles | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130994 | Karman | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030043157 | Miles | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030043346 | Kwok et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030128430 | Leu et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030156238 | Hiraishi et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156326 | Lotz et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156328 | Goto et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030214632 | Ma et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030227585 | Chang et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040061935 | Obsako | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040196551 | Chubachi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040233524 | Lippey | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240053 | Shimoda | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050030480 | Lippey | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050105176 | Lippey | May 2005 | A1 |
20050207002 | Liu et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050231800 | Lippey | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050241530 | Bruckner et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4442045 | May 1996 | DE |
197 47 597 | Aug 1998 | DE |
19901970 | Aug 2000 | DE |
0 442 738 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0 493 863 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0 648 048 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0 609 593 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0833172 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0 856 768 | May 1998 | EP |
0 657 769 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1 324 114 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1324114 | Jul 2003 | EP |
511 199 | Aug 1939 | GB |
652 859 | May 1951 | GB |
2161983 | Jan 1986 | GB |
56047012 | Apr 1981 | JP |
62178906 | Aug 1987 | JP |
05011344 | Jan 1993 | JP |
05216123 | Aug 1993 | JP |
06148409 | May 1994 | JP |
HEI 6-289491 | Oct 1994 | JP |
07 270 915 | Feb 1996 | JP |
08186849 | Nov 1996 | JP |
H11-119002 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2001-005412 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2000-284908 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001 055646 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2003-50306 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003-121637 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-337381 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-029163 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004038003 | Feb 2004 | JP |
200461545 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004-101558 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-117480 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-138938 | May 2004 | JP |
2004-144882 | May 2004 | JP |
2004-144883 | May 2004 | JP |
2004163806 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004170959 | Jun 2004 | JP |
WO 9517690 | Jun 1995 | WO |
9632663 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9836320 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 0041009 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0045220 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0057214 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 03050612 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03077027 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03077028 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004031852 | Apr 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080239497 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |