The present invention relates to selective laser solidification and in particular to an improved selective laser melting process and apparatus in which an order in which objects or parts of objects are built is selected based on a direction of gas flow.
Additive manufacturing or rapid prototyping methods for producing objects comprise layer-by-layer solidification of a material, such as a metal powder material, using a laser beam. A powder layer is deposited on a powder bed in a build chamber and a laser beam is scanned across portions of the powder layer that correspond to a cross-section of the object being constructed. The laser beam melts or sinters the powder to form a solidified layer. After selective solidification of a layer, the powder bed is lowered by a thickness of the newly solidified layer and a further layer of powder is spread over the surface and solidified, as required. In a single build, more than one object can be built, the objects spaced apart in the powder bed.
During the melting or sintering process, debris (e.g. condensate, unsolidified particles of powder etc) is produced within the build chamber. It is known to introduce a gas flow through the build chamber in an attempt to remove debris from the chamber in the gas flow. For example, the M280 model of machine produced by EOS GmbH, Munich, Germany comprises a series of gas outlet nozzles located to the rear of the powder bed that pass a flow of gas to a series of exhaust vents that are located at the front of the powder bed. In this manner, a planar layer of gas flow is created at the surface of the powder bed. A similar arrangement is provided in Renishaw's AM250 and AM125 machines, wherein apertures at either side of a powder bed provide substantially planar gas flow across the powder bed. It has been found that debris can be blown from one section of an object to another section of the object or to another object. This can result in non-uniformity and increased porosity of the solidified metal layers generated by the melting process. In particular, debris blown across the powder bed can result in an increase in surface roughness such that pores are formed between adjacent layers. Non-uniformities in a build can result in an object not conforming to the desired design and damage the apparatus. In particular, a wiper blade is typically used to spread each powder layer across the powder bed. Solidified structures that project out of the powder bed can catch on and cause damage to the wiper blade. Damaged wiper blades may result in powder layers with ridges of powder. Accordingly, non-uniformities in a build may be a concern not just for the layer being formed, but powder layers formed thereafter.
According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a selective laser solidification apparatus, comprising; a powder bed onto which a powder layer can be deposited, a gas flow unit for passing a flow of gas over the powder bed along a gas flow direction, a laser scanning unit for scanning a laser beam over the powder layer to selectively solidify at least part of the powder layer to form one or more objects and a processing unit for selecting a scanning sequence of the laser beam based on the gas flow direction.
The scanning sequence may be selected such that debris produced by the scan is carried away from areas of the powder layer which are yet to be scanned. In this way, these areas of powder are not disturbed and contaminated by the debris ensuring that, when these areas are solidified, the solidified layer is built to a desired, uniform height. For example, the processing unit may select to scan one area before another area because the area is located downwind in the gas flow direction of the other area. Debris produced in forming the upwind area may be blown onto the already formed downwind area but this debris may be removed by the wiper and, if not removed, covered by the next powder layer to be remelted when forming the next cross-section. Accordingly, scanning areas in this order is less likely to result in non-uniformities in the build.
The one or more objects may be formed through the solidification of separate islands in at least one powder layer, the processing unit arranged to select an order in which islands are formed based upon the relative location of the islands in the at least one powder layer and the gas flow direction.
The order in which islands are formed may be selected such that debris produced by forming an island is carried away from areas of the powder layer in which islands are yet to be formed. In this way, these areas of powder are not disturbed and contaminated by the debris ensuring that, when these areas are solidified, the solidified layer is built to a desired, uniform height. For example, the processing unit may select to form at least part of an island before at least part of another island because the at least part of the island is located downwind in the gas flow direction of at least part of the other island. Debris produced in forming the upwind island may be blown onto the already formed downwind island but this debris will be covered by the next powder layer and the debris is likely to be remelted when forming the next cross-section. Accordingly, building the islands in this order is less likely to result in non-uniformities in the build.
For islands wherein a first island is located wholly downwind of a second island, the processing unit may be arranged to select to form the first island completely before forming the second island. However, if a first island is located to at least partially surround a second island such that parts of the first island are downwind and other parts of the first island are upwind of the second island, the processing unit may be arranged to select to form at least part of the second island in between forming the downwind and upwind parts of the first island.
The processing unit may determine an order in which areas should be scanned by projecting a debris fallout zone that would be created when solidifying each area and determining whether one or more other areas to be solidified fall within the debris fallout zone, the processing unit selecting to solidify the one or more other areas that fall within the debris fallout zone before solidifying the area from which the debris fallout zone has been projected. The debris fallout zone may be projected as a pair of parallel lines extending in the gas flow direction from outmost edges of the area in a direction perpendicular to the gas flow direction. Such a debris fallout zone may be suitable when the gas flow is a laminar gas flow (Reynolds number less than 2000). However, it may also be desirable to project the debris fallout zone as diverging lines at a slight angle to the gas flow direction to take into account slight turbulence in the gas flow that may cause the debris to be deposited beyond the outmost edges of the area in a direction perpendicular to the gas flow direction. More complex models of the region over which debris may be deposited may be used requiring more complex projections of the debris fallout zone. For example, areas to be solidified that are located close to an edge of the powder bed may be subjected to more turbulent flow because these areas are closer to the sidewalls of a build chamber than areas located centrally in the powder bed.
The apparatus may comprise an interface for the user to identify the one or more objects to be formed. The user may select the locations on a build platform where the one or more objects are to be built. Alternatively, the processing unit may be arranged to select the locations on a build platform for the one or more objects. The processor may select the location for one or more of the objects based upon the debris fallout zone of an object whose location has already been selected.
According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided a method of selecting a scanning sequence of a laser beam in a selective laser solidification process, in which one or more objects are formed layer-by-layer by, repeatedly, depositing a layer of powder on a powder bed and scanning a laser beam over the deposited powder to selectively solidify at least part of the powder layers, wherein a gas flow is passed over the powder bed in a gas flow direction, the method comprising selecting a scanning sequence of the laser beam based on the gas flow direction.
The method may be a computer-implemented method.
According to a third aspect of the invention there is provided a data carrier having instructions stored thereon, the instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to carry out the method of the second aspect of the invention.
According to a fourth aspect of the invention there is provided apparatus for selecting a scanning sequence of a laser beam in a selective laser solidification process, in which one or more objects are formed layer-by-layer by, repeatedly, depositing a layer of powder on a powder bed and scanning a laser beam over the deposited powder to selectively solidify at least part of the powder layers, wherein a gas flow is passed over the powder bed in a gas flow direction, the apparatus comprising a processing unit, a display and a user input device, the processing unit arranged to receive data on one or more objects, including a location of the objects on a build platform, cause the display to display an image of areas to be solidified, wherein a debris fallout zone is projected from each area, and receive a user input from the user input device of an order in which the areas are to be scanned.
According to a fifth aspect of the invention there is provided a data carrier for selecting a scanning sequence of a laser beam in a selective laser solidification process, in which one or more objects are formed layer-by-layer by, repeatedly, depositing a layer of powder on a powder bed and scanning a laser beam over the deposited powder to selectively solidify at least part of the powder layers, wherein a gas flow is passed over the powder bed in a gas flow direction, the data carrier having instructions thereon, which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to receive data on one or more objects, including a location of the objects on a build platform, cause a display to display an image of areas to be solidified, wherein a debris fallout zone is projected from each area, and receive a user input from a user input device of an order in which the areas are to be scanned.
The data carrier of the above aspects of the invention may be a suitable medium for providing a machine with instructions such as non-transient data carrier, for example a floppy disk, a CD ROM, a DVD ROM/RAM (including −R/−RW and +R/+RW), an HD DVD, a Blu Ray™ disc, a memory (such as a Memory Stick™, an SD card, a compact flash card, or the like), a disc drive (such as a hard disk drive), a tape, any magneto/optical storage, or a transient data carrier, such as a signal on a wire or fiber optic or a wireless signal, for example a signals sent over a wired or wireless network (such as an Internet download, an FTP transfer, or the like).
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, as examples only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:—
Referring to
An inlet 112 and outlet 110 are arranged for generating a gas flow across the powder bed formed on the build platform 102. The inlet 112 and outlet 110 are arranged to produce a laminar flow having a flow direction from the inlet to the outlet, as indicated by arrows 118. Gas is re-circulated from the outlet 110 to the inlet 112 through a gas recirculation loop 111. A pump 113 maintains the desired gas pressure at inlet 112 and openings 5, 6. A filter 114 is provided in the recirculation loop 111 to filter from the gas condensate that has become entrapped in the flow. It will be understood that more than one inlet 112 may be provided in the build chamber 101. Furthermore, rather than extending outside of the build chamber 101, the recirculation loop 111 may be contained within the build chamber 101.
Computer 130 comprises a processor unit 131, memory 132, display 133, user input device 134, such as a keyboard, touch screen, etc, a data connection to modules of the laser sintering unit, such as optical module 106 and laser module 105, and an external data connection 135. Stored on memory 132 is a computer program that instructs the processing unit to carry out the method described with reference to
Referring to
Rather than restricting ordering of the build to a complete island, the processing unit 131 may be arranged to select to form, in between forming different parts of the island, at least part of another island.
In this embodiment, the processing unit 131 carries out this process for each layer. However, in another embodiment, rather than calculating a scanning order for each layer, it may be possible to determine an order for multiple layers from a single analysis. For example, a fallout zone could be determined from a footprint of each object on the build platform 102, the order being determined based upon whether other objects fall within a debris fallout zone calculated based on this footprint. Even though for some layers the debris fallout zone may be smaller than that calculated from the footprint, such a method may provide a reasonable generalization that reduces the amount of processing required in determining an order in which the parts should be built.
The selected order of scanning the parts may be displayed to the user and the user may be able to change the order. The user can then activate the build to cause the processing unit to control 204 the optical module 106 and laser module 105 to scan the powder layers to form the islands in the selected order.
In the embodiment shown in
In a further embodiment, rather than the processing unit selecting the order in which islands are scanned, a user may select an order in which islands are built. This may be achieved by the processing unit 131 causing the display 133 to display images similar to those shown in
It will be understood that in the above description, the islands may come together in earlier or later layers so as to form a single object or may remain separate so as to form one or more separate objects.
It will be understood that alterations and modifications may be made to the invention without departing from the scope of the invention as defined herein. For example, the invention could be applied to a single island, wherein it is desirable to scan a downwind part of the island ahead of scanning an upwind part of the island.
This is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/838,095 filed Apr. 2, 2020, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/461,743 filed Mar. 17, 2017, which is a Divisional Application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/179,021 filed Feb. 12, 2014, which in turn claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/791,636 filed Mar. 15, 2013. The entire disclosures of the prior applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5017317 | Marcus | May 1991 | A |
5155324 | Deckard et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5352405 | Beaman et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5534104 | Langer et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5730925 | Mattes et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6215093 | Meiners et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6583379 | Meiners et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6694207 | Darrah et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7047098 | Lindemann et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
8034279 | Dimter et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
9522426 | Das et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
10252333 | McMurtry et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10493562 | Dimter et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
20020015654 | Das et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20040099996 | Herzog | May 2004 | A1 |
20050116391 | Lindemann et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142024 | Herzog | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060192322 | Abe et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060249485 | Partanen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080241392 | Dimter et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090017220 | Muller et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090266803 | Perret et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090291308 | Pfister et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100044547 | Higashi et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110135840 | Doye et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110221099 | Oberhofer et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110285060 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291331 | Scott | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120061360 | Idaka et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120251378 | Abe | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20140301883 | Wiesner et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160114432 | Ferrar et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160114531 | Chuang et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160279706 | Domrose et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160288209 | Jakimov et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170136696 | Jakimov et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20180185961 | Meidani et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190077077 | Martin et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1827283 | Sep 2006 | CN |
101321600 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101653827 | Feb 2010 | CN |
101842222 | Sep 2010 | CN |
101932429 | Dec 2010 | CN |
102164696 | Aug 2011 | CN |
102574333 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102574333 | Jul 2015 | CN |
105500720 | Apr 2016 | CN |
39 23 829 | Jan 1991 | DE |
19514740 | Apr 1996 | DE |
19649865 | Feb 1998 | DE |
19853947 | Feb 2000 | DE |
101 12 591 | Oct 2001 | DE |
100 42 132 | Mar 2002 | DE |
100 42 134 | Mar 2002 | DE |
102 08 150 | Sep 2002 | DE |
102004031881 | Jan 2006 | DE |
10 2004 041 633 | Mar 2006 | DE |
10 2004 057 866 | Jun 2006 | DE |
10 2006 014835 | Oct 2007 | DE |
102004031881 | Nov 2007 | DE |
10 2006 059 851 | Jul 2008 | DE |
102007014683 | Oct 2008 | DE |
10 2009 038241 | Mar 2010 | DE |
10 2010 052 206 | May 2012 | DE |
0 416 852 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0 429 196 | May 1991 | EP |
0590956 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0 617 657 | Feb 1997 | EP |
1234625 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1419836 | May 2004 | EP |
1839781 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1 583 626 | Jul 2010 | EP |
2431113 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2492084 | Aug 2012 | EP |
2978589 | Feb 2016 | EP |
2 046 801 | Nov 1980 | GB |
2378151 | Feb 2003 | GB |
S62-151091 | Sep 1987 | JP |
2002-224864 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002224864 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2006-124732 | May 2006 | JP |
4499934 | Jul 2010 | JP |
8802677 | Apr 1988 | WO |
9208567 | May 1992 | WO |
9208592 | May 1992 | WO |
9308928 | May 1993 | WO |
9407681 | Apr 1994 | WO |
9824574 | Jun 1998 | WO |
0030785 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0030789 | Jun 2000 | WO |
03039844 | May 2003 | WO |
2006024373 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2008116518 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009156316 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010007396 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2011049143 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2014125258 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014125280 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014125281 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014154878 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014154879 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014199150 | Dec 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine translation of JP2002224864A, Iketani et al. Aug. 13, 2002 (Year: 2002). |
Oct. 9, 2014 Written Opinion issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2014/050418. |
Oct. 9, 2014 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2014/050418. |
Aug. 28, 2014 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2014/050417. |
Aug. 28, 2014 Written Opinion issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2014/050417. |
Apr. 8, 2013 Search Report issued in British Patent Application No. 1303920.1. |
Ferrar et al; “Gas flow effects on selective laser melting (SLM) manufacturing performance;” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Elsevier, NL; Sep. 26, 2011; vol. 212; No. 2; pp. 355-364. |
Abe et al; “Influence of forming conditions on the titanium model in rapid prototyping with the selective laser melting process;” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science Mechanical Engineering Publications; Jan. 1, 2003; vol. 217; No. 1; pp. 119-126. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,021, filed Feb. 12, 2014 in the name of Ferrar. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/766,627, filed Aug. 7, 2015 in the name of Dimter et al. |
Oct. 8, 2015 International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion issued in PCT/EP2014/056323. |
S. Dadbakhsh et al., “Effect of selective laser melting layout on the quality of stainless steel parts”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 18, Issue 3, pp. 241-249. |
Aug. 26, 2016 Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,021. |
Jun. 14, 2016 Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480020782.3. |
May 27, 2016 Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 2014-80020930.1. |
Jan. 17, 2017 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,021. |
Jan. 25, 2017 Office Action issued in Chinese Office Action 201480020930.1. |
Apr. 10, 2017 Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480020782.3. |
Aug. 1, 2017 Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 201480020930.1. |
Ferrar et al., “Gas Flow Effects on selective laser melting (SLM) manufacturing performance”, Oct. 2011, Elsevier, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 212, pp. 355-364. |
Machine translation of German Patent document DE102004031881, Feb. 2018. |
Mar. 5, 2018 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/766,627. |
Mar. 13, 2018 Office Action issued in Japanese Application No. 2015-557511. |
EOS launches EOSINT M280 metal additive manufacturing system, Industrial Lasers.com website, Mar. 12, 2010. |
Mar. 20, 2018 Office Action issued in Japanese Application No. 2015-557513. |
Apr. 24, 2018 Search Report issued in European Application No. 17 20 9698. |
Laser sintering system EOSINT M 280, “M-Solutions”, Jun. 1, 2013, XP055134972. |
EOSINT M 280/PSW 3.5, EOS GmbH—Electro Optical Systems, 2011, pp. 1-179. |
English-language translation of JP-A-2002-224864. |
Aug. 29, 2018 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/777,926. |
Sep. 5, 2018 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/766,627. |
Jul. 9, 2018 Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 18161266.4. |
“Technical Description EOSINT M 280”. EOS GmbH—Electro Optical Systems, 1-33, 2010. |
JP-2002224864-A Translation Japanese Language to English Language (Year: 2019). |
May 31, 2019 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/461,743. |
Jan. 6, 2021 Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/838,095. |
Apr. 29, 2021 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/838,095. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/838,095, filed Apr. 2, 2020 in the name of Ferrar. |
Sep. 21, 2022 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/587,146. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210354197 A1 | Nov 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61791636 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14179021 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 15461743 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16838095 | Apr 2020 | US |
Child | 17386695 | US | |
Parent | 15461743 | Mar 2017 | US |
Child | 16838095 | US |