Example embodiments are related to tool heads for engaging with sockets. In particular, at least some example embodiments are related to adjustable tool heads for engaging with socket fasteners.
It is often a challenge for a user to identify and locate the correct tool head size for engaging with a given socket fastener. Conventional tools, such as Allen key sets or hex key sets, are designed such that a single tool head will fit only a single socket size. The result is that the user must either determine the size of a given socket and select the appropriately-sized tool, or else must use trial-and-error to find the tool that matches the size of the socket.
It may be advantageous to provide a single tool head that is usable for multiple socket sizes.
In some examples, there is provided a tool head. The tool head includes: an inner core having a proximal end and a distal end, and defining a longitudinal axis; and a plurality of nested shells fitted over the inner core and substantially sharing the longitudinal axis of the inner core, each shell being engaged with the inner core at a proximal end, and each shell being independently biased towards the distal end of the inner core and independently compressible away from the distal end; wherein each shell is independently slidable relative to the inner core and relative to each other.
Reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings which show example embodiments, and in which:
Similar reference numerals may have been used in different figures to denote similar components.
In various examples, there is provided a tool head capable of self-adjusting to adapt to the size of socket fasteners with which it is used to apply torque to. In some examples, the tool head includes a solid core, a set of nested tubular shells, and a set of biasing members (e.g., springs). The solid core is a single body, which may have steps having various cross-sectional sizes. In examples where the tool head is designed to engage with hexagonal sockets, the solid core may include steps of hexagonal cross sections of various sizes.
Tubular shells with external contours, which conform to the internal contour of the sockets the tool head is designed to turn, engage slidably with its corresponding step of the solid core as well as with any shells nested within it. Each shell may remain substantially in contact with a coiled compression spring which is substantially in contact on the opposite end with a shoulder of the solid core between two steps. Thus, each shell may be pushed distally by its respective spring. The furthest distal position of the shells may be set using a shell retention mechanism, such as one or more sets of pins attached to the shell that extend beyond its interior contour and slide within one or more slots in the solid core, or using any other suitable mechanism.
In various examples, the tool head may automatically self-adjust shell engagement when the tool head is aligned and pressed against an appropriate socket fastener. The tool head may be designed such that sockets of the typical largest size in a configuration may require no adjustment of shell positions (i.e., the tool head may be used in its default or uncompressed configuration). The flat face of the barrel of smaller sockets fasteners may depress shells that are too large to fit in the socket, exposing the shell with the correct outer contour, which engages with the socket and allows for torquing of the socket fastener using the tool head.
Reference is now made to
In an example embodiment, the default or rest uncompressed configuration is illustrated in
In the example shown, the tool head includes three shells 1, 2, 3, however in other examples there may be more or less shells present. The shells 1, 2, 3 may have face-to-opposite-face (also referred to herein as width) measurements of about 4 mm, 5 mm and 6 mm, respectively. The shells may be arranged over an inner core 4 having, at its distal end, a width of about 3 mm, and increasing in size stepwise, as shown in the figures and as discussed below. The shells 1, 2, 3 may have a hexagonal cross-section, for engaging a hexagonal socket. Such dimensions may be suitable for engaging with typical sockets found commonly on bicycles, for example, although the tool head may not be limited in example embodiments. Generally, the size and shapes of the shells may be designed to match the size and shapes of the sockets with which the tool head is expected to engage.
In the example shown, the innermost shell 1 (which may be smallest-sized shell) with a thru bore engages slidably with the corresponding section of the solid core 4 as well as with the corresponding bore of the next shell 2. A biasing member, such as a coil spring 9, pushes against the shoulder of the core 4, wraps around the smallest corresponding section of the core 4, is contained within the bore of the next shell 2, and applies force on the proximal end of the innermost shell 1 towards the distal direction. In the example where the tool head is designed to engage with a hexagonal shaped socket, the bores of each of the shells 1, 2, the core 4, and the shape of the coil spring 9 may all be correspondingly hexagonal.
In the uncompressed configuration, the distal end of the innermost shell 1 may be slightly recessed from the distal end of the core 4. In other examples, the innermost shell 1 may be substantially flush with the distal end of the core 4. This position of the innermost shell 1, in the uncompressed configuration, may be the most distal position that the shell 1 may slide.
Reference is again made to
The configuration and operation of the next outer shell 3, and any other subsequent shells may be substantially similar to that described above for the shell 2. Similarly to the shells 1 and 2, the shell 3 may engage with the core 4 at its proximal end via a spring 11. Distal movement of the shell 3 may be restricted using a shell retention mechanism, for example comprising a pin 8, similar to that described above with respect to the shell 1.
The outermost shell (which is the shell 3 in the example illustrated in
In examples where the container piece 5 is present, the container piece 5 may be a substantially tubular shell (e.g., having a hexagonal bore matching the core 4, in examples where the core 4 has a hexagonal cross-section) and a length that extends at least partway up the exterior of the outmost shell 3. The length of the container piece 5 may be such that it does not limit the engagement of the shell 3 in a socket fastener, for example the container piece 5 may not extend to the distal end of the shell 3. The interior surface of the container piece 5 engages with a portion of the exterior surface of the core and also with a length of the exterior surface of the shell 3. The container piece 5 may be secured to the core 4, e.g., using an adhesive, fastener and/or using a friction fit.
A user may grasp the tool head near its proximal end, e.g., grasping the tool head directly or using a handle coupled near its proximal end, for example as described with respect to
In some examples, the tool head may provide a good or sufficient engagement with a socket even where the tool head does not provide an exact match with the size and/or shape of the socket. For example, the self-adjusting characteristic of the tool head may ensure that the tool head provides the best fit possible with the socket, even if the fit is not exact or if the socket is a non-standard size.
As shown in
In an example embodiment, as shown in
In an example embodiment, a casing of the handle 400 can further comprise an aperture 404 or eyelet. The aperture 404 can be used, for example, to attach the handle 400 to other objects such as a bicycle, a keychain, a hook, a tool belt, etc.
Suitable materials for at least some components, shell(s), and/or solid core of the tool head 100 can include rigid materials which can withstand the resultant torsional forces when in operation. In some example embodiments, such materials can include hardened tool steel or stainless steel, etc.
In an example embodiment, a use or method of the tool head 100 is provided. The method includes: engaging the tool head 100 with a socket; retracting one or more shells 1, 2, 3, of the tool head 100 against a respective biasing member (e.g. coil spring 9) due to the engagement of the tool head with the socket, wherein at least the inner core 4 and possibly one or more of the shells 1, 2, 3 remains within the socket; and rotating the tool head 100 to rotate the socket.
In another example embodiment, six shells can be used on one tool, for example 2 mm, 2.5 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm, 5 mm, and 6 mm. In an example embodiment, these sizes could be split into two shafts or tool heads, or on opposing ends of the same shaft. For example, 2 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm are on one end or side and 2.5 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm are on the other end or side.
In some examples, the disclosed tool head may provide better performance than conventional telescoping tool designs. The use of a solid core in the disclosed tool head, for example, may enable simpler, faster and/or less costly manufacture. The use of a solid core, for example, may also provide better transmission of torsional force than long hollow sections as in the conventional telescoping tools. In the disclosed tool head, for example, no hollow shell is torsionally loaded without both ends of the shell length being supported internally (by the solid core and by any inner shells) and/or externally. For example, when the second largest shell is under load, torsion from the distal end where it engages the socket is transmitted internally through the smaller inner shell(s) to the solid inner core. Remaining torsion from the second largest shell is transmitted to where the second largest shell contacts the core itself at the proximal end of the shell, and also transmitted to the depressed largest shell that partially encases the second largest shell and thus transmitted to the core via the largest shell. This configuration may help to reduce the strength requirements of the shells, which may help to improve manufacturability.
In an example embodiment, the tool head 100 is mounted onto a motor-controlled rotary tool, for semi-automated or automated use of the tool head 100.
The example embodiments described above are intended to be examples only. Example embodiments may be embodied in other specific forms. Alterations, modifications and variations to the example embodiments may be made without departing from the intended scope of the present disclosure. While the systems, devices and processes disclosed and shown herein may comprise a specific number of elements/components, the systems, devices and assemblies could be modified to include additional or fewer of such elements/components. For example, while any of the elements/components disclosed may be referenced as being singular, the embodiments disclosed herein could be modified to include a plurality of such elements/components. Selected features from one or more of the above-described embodiments may be combined to create alternative embodiments not explicitly described. All values and sub-ranges within disclosed ranges are also disclosed. The subject matter described herein intends to cover and embrace all suitable changes in technology.
This application is a U.S. nationalization under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/CA2016/050875 filed Jul. 25, 2017 entitled TOOL HEAD, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/198,196 filed Jul. 29, 2015 entitled TOOL HEAD, all the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference into the below DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2016/050875 | 7/25/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/015754 | 2/2/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1896949 | Greiner | Feb 1933 | A |
1997948 | Pearson | Apr 1935 | A |
2660082 | Dreese | Aug 1952 | A |
2735325 | Rudd, Sr. | Feb 1956 | A |
2822714 | Paparelli | Feb 1958 | A |
3127798 | Gol | Apr 1964 | A |
3651720 | Indyk | Mar 1972 | A |
20150217432 | Gadd | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 28, 2017 for PCT/CA2016/050875. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180222031 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62198196 | Jul 2015 | US |