This invention relates to pliers, and, more particularly, to a self-adjusting pliers that grips workpieces of various sizes without manual adjustment.
The traditional version of a pliers includes two elongated members joined at a pivot pin. One end of each elongated member forms a jaw, and the other end forms a handle. Workpieces of different sizes are grasped in different manners, due to the constant geometry of the elongated members and the jaws. Some adjustability may be achieved by providing a slotted receiver in one of the handles, so that the handle with the pivot pin may be moved between different positions in the slot to provide adjustability for gripping objects of different sizes.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,651,598 provides an improved pliers whose jaws are self adjusting according to the size of the workpiece. Commercial versions of this pliers are useful, but have significant drawbacks. Perhaps the most significant problem with the pliers made according to the '598 patent is that the jaws move slightly relative to each other in an end-to-end manner as they are clamped down onto a workpiece. The surfaces of soft workpieces such as brass or copper may be marred as a result. The clamping force applied by these pliers depends upon the size of the workpiece being grasped.
Another problem with the pliers of the '598 patent is that they do not lock to the workpiece, an important convenience in some uses of pliers. Overcenter locking pliers are described in a series of patents such as U.S. Pat. No. 4,541,312. Conventional overcenter locking pliers provide adjustability in the size of the workpiece that may be gripped through a screw adjustment to the pivoting position of the control arm, but this adjustability is not automatic in the sense of the pliers of the '598 patent.
Other types of locking pliers such as the AutoLock™ pliers combine the self-adjusting feature with an overcenter locking mechanism. This pliers can be inconvenient to use for some sizes of workpieces, suffers from some of the problems of the pliers of the '598 patent, does not achieve a large gripping force, and may unexpectedly unlock when large objects are being gripped. Additionally, as with some other pliers, two hands are required for its operation.
There is a need for a self-adjusting pliers which does not experience shifting of the jaw position as the object is grasped, which may be operated with one hand, and which may be provided in a locking version. The present invention fulfills this need.
The present invention provides a self-adjusting pliers wherein the jaws automatically adjust to various sizes of workpieces. There is no end-to-end relative movement of the jaws as they grasp the workpiece, so that there can be no surface marring of the type observed with the pliers of the '598 patent. The clamping force is substantially constant regardless of the size of the workpiece, but is adjustable in some versions of the pliers. The clamping force against the workpiece is multiplied several times by the mechanism, leading to a much higher maximum available clamping force than possible with conventional pliers. The pliers may be provided with no locking or with releasable overcenter locking, or with the ability to switch between the two. The self-adjusting pliers is operable with one hand.
In accordance with the invention, a self-adjusting pliers is operable to grasp a workpiece between an upper jaw and a lower jaw. The pliers includes an upper arm having a first end and a second end. The upper jaw is at the first end of the upper arm. A jaw arm has a first end and a second end. The second end of the jaw arm is pivotably connected to the upper arm at a main pivot adjacent to the second end of the upper arm, so that the first end of the jaw arm is movable in a circular arc relative to the main pivot. The lower jaw is located at the first end of the jaw arm in movable facing relation to the upper jaw as the jaw arm pivots about the main pivot, so that the workpiece may be grasped between the upper jaw and the lower jaw. An engagement mechanism releasably engages the jaw arm to the upper arm at an engagement position responsive to a movement of the jaw arm relative to the upper arm and responsive to a size of the workpiece grasped between the upper jaw and the lower jaw. Further gross rotation of the jaw arm relative to the upper arm is thereby prevented until the engagement to the workpiece is released. The upper jaw and the lower jaw are each preferably of a multilayer metallic construction.
Preferably, there is a support integral with, and extending from the upper arm toward and past the jaw arm. The support includes a support engagement curved in a circular arc centered about the main pivot. The support engagement desirably includes an engagement slot or channel in the support, and a restraining plate to restrain, guide, position, and align some of the components of the engagement mechanism. There is additionally a lower arm that is linked to the jaw arm at a location adjacent to the lower jaw, but that is not integral with the jaw arm. A control arm has a first end and a second end. The first end of the control arm is pivotably connected to the jaw arm at an upper control-arm pivot pin adjacent to the second end of the jaw arm. The second end of the control arm is pivotably connected to the lower arm at a lower control-arm pivot pin at a location along the length of the lower arm. A lower-arm spring biases the lower arm so as to resist rotation of the lower arm about the upper control-arm pivot pin.
The engagement mechanism desirably includes a shifter and a pawl that is pivotably supported on the shifter. The shifter is operable to engage the pawl to the upper arm, and specifically to the downwardly extending support, at the engagement position responsive to the movement of the jaw arm relative to the upper arm and responsive to the size of the workpiece grasped between the upper jaw and the lower jaw. The shifter transmits a locking and engaging force applied through the lower arm to the lower jaw and also engages the pawl to the support engagement slot responsive to the movement of the jaw arm relative to the upper arm and responsive to the size of the workpiece grasped between the upper jaw and the lower jaw. The shifter is pivotable relative to the jaw arm and is rotatable relative to the lower arm, and the pawl is pivotably supported on the shifter.
The engagement mechanism releasably engages the jaw arm to the upper arm. There may also be a locking mechanism that releasably locks the jaw arm to the upper arm, and specifically to the downwardly extending support, at the engagement position. Some versions of the pliers are controllably alterable between the releasable-engagement type and the releasable engagement-and-lock type by the operation of a locking engagement control. In one design, a locking-engagement control of the locking mechanism interferes with a rotation of the control arm about the upper control-arm pivot pin in the releasable-engagement embodiment, and the locking engagement control does not interfere with a rotation of the control arm about-the upper control-arm pivot pin in the releasable engagement-and-lock embodiment.
In one form, the pliers includes a releasable overcenter lock for the jaws. In this version, there is a downwardly extending lobe on the control arm. A release arm is pivotably connected to the lower arm and has a release pad disposed to contact the lobe of the control arm when the release arm is pivoted. In operation, the control arm moves to an overcenter position when the clamping force is fully applied. This overcenter position may be released to unlock the jaws from the workpiece either by pulling the handles apart, or by manually pivoting the release arm. The overcenter locking is readily released by pulling the upper arm and the lower arm apart when the clamping force is small, but is more conveniently released by operating the release arm when the clamping force is large.
In another version, the pliers is controllably switchable between a nonlocking function and a locking function. An overcenter lock switch mechanism in the lower handle is movable between a first position whereat the overcenter lock switch mechanism does not prevent pivoting movement of the lower arm relative to the control arm prior to reaching an overcenter lock, and a second position whereat the overcenter lock switch mechanism does prevent pivoting movement of the lower arm relative to the control arm prior to reaching an overcenter lock. The movement of the locking switch mechanism to the second position prevents the pivoting movement of the lower arm and the control arm to an overcenter locking position, and thereby prevents this overcenter locking function. Thus, there may be nonlocking-only, locking-only, or switchable embodiments of the pliers that may be switched between the nonlocking and locking forms.
The maximum magnitude of the clamping force applied to the workpiece maybe much larger than possible with conventional pliers, due to a force multiplication effect present in the mechanism. The length of the arms, the angle between the control arm and the lower arm, the relative location of the shifter pivot points, and the movement of the shifter relative to the jaw mechanism all contribute to a leveraged multiplication of the force applied though the handles. The multiplication factors are established by the structural geometry built into the pliers.
The pliers may be provided with control over the clamping force applied to the workpiece through the jaws. A manual force adjuster acting on the control arm is provided at a location adjacent to the second end of the upper arm. The manual force adjuster is operable to move the upper control-arm pivot pin along the jaw arm. This movement of the pivot point of the first end of the control arm changes its angle and position relative to the lower arm and to the jaw arm, with the result that the maximum clamping force applied through the jaws is controllably variable. It is preferred to combine the features of both the manual force adjuster and the releasable overcenter lock in a single pliers, when either feature is provided.
In operation, with the jaws separated and not contacting the workpiece, the jaw arm, the lower arm, the control arm, and the engagement mechanism initially rotate relative to the upper arm as an interconnected unit about the main pivot. An anti-squat mechanism aids in maintaining the fixed geometrical relationship of these elements during the initial rotation. A main spring reacts between this interconnected unit and the upper arm, and specifically between the jaw arm and the upper arm. The main spring weakly biases the interconnected unit away from the upper arm to initially keep the jaws separated. The hand force applied by the user through the upper arm and the lower arm overcomes this biasing to move the jaws toward contact with the workpiece. When the jaws contact the workpiece, the shifter begins to rotate to apply the hand force of the user to the workpiece as the clamping force. As the contact pressure increases further, the force multiplication effect comes into play to produce a clamping force that is greater than the user would otherwise produce. The workpiece is thereby clamped between the jaws with a maximum clamping force that is controllable through the force adjuster. Release of the hand force by the user reverses the process. If the pliers is the locking embodiment or the switchable embodiment operated in the locking mode, the lock automatically engages to hold the workpiece securely even though the user relaxes the force applied through the upper arm and the lower arm. The locking may be unlocked by operating the release arm.
The mechanism of the invention is operable to move the lower jaw upwardly along the downwardly extending guide until the lower jaw contacts the workpiece, and to then engage the jaw arm to the upper arm and to transfer a clamping force to the lower jaw. The clamping mechanism is thus self-adjusting to accommodate any size workpiece that will fit between the jaws. Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following more detailed description of the preferred embodiment, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention. The scope of the invention is not, however, limited to this preferred embodiment.
As illustrated in
As best seen in
A support 44 is integral with and extends downwardly from the upper arm 28 toward and past the jaw arm 34. The support 44 includes a support engagement 46 therein, curved in a circular arc centered about the center of the main pivot 40. The support engagement 46 is preferably a support engagement slot 48. The support engagement slot 48 desirably includes small support engagement teeth 50 along a side 51 of the slot 48 nearest the jaws 24 and 26.
A lower arm 52 is linked to the jaw arm 34 at a location adjacent to the lower jaw 26. The lower arm 52 is not integral with the jaw arm 34. The lower arm 52 extends generally parallel to the upper arm 28. The upper arm 28 and the lower arm 52 are grasped by the hand of the user of the pliers 20, and an upper arm pad 54 and a lower arm pad 56 are provided in their outwardly facing surfaces to facilitate this grasping and aid in the user positioning the grasping hand correctly. The upper arm 28 and the lower arm 52 thereby serve as the handles grasped by the user of the pliers 20.
A control arm 58 has a first end 60 and a second end 62. The first end 60 of the control arm 58 is pivotably connected to the jaw arm 34 at an upper control-arm pivot pin 64 adjacent to the second end 38 of the jaw arm 34. The upper control-arm pivot pin 64 extends between the sides of the jaw arm 34. The second end 62 of the control arm 58 is pivotably connected to the lower arm 52 at a lower control-arm pivot point 66 that is positioned at a location, in this case an intermediate location, along the length of the lower arm 52.
A lower-arm spring 68 biases the lower arm 52 so as to resist rotation of the lower arm 52 about the upper control arm pivot point 64. In the illustrated embodiment, the lower-arm spring 68 is a coil spring connected between a projection 70 on the lower arm 52 and an intermediate location 72 on the jaw arm 34.
In operation, the jaw arm 34, the lower arm 52, the control arm 58, and an engagement mechanism initially rotate relative to the upper arm 28 as an interconnected unit 73 about the main pivot 40. A main spring 74, illustrated as a main leaf spring, reacts between this interconnected unit 73 and the upper arm 28, and specifically between the jaw arm 34 and the upper arm 28. The main leaf spring 74 biases the interconnected unit 73 away from the upper arm 28, so that the jaws 24 and 26 are normally spread apart to receive the workpiece 22 therebetween. The squeezing hand force of the user grasping the upper arm 28 through the upper arm pad 54, and the lower arm 52 through the lower arm pad 56, overcomes this biasing force of the main leaf spring 74 to achieve the initial contact and initial grasping of the workpiece 22 between the jaws 24 and 26.
In the preferred form of the pliers 20, the upper control-arm pivot pin 64 is selectively movable generally (but not precisely) parallel to a line extending between the first end 30 and the second end 32 of the upper arm 28. This movement serves to adjust the maximum clamping force exerted by the jaws 24 and 26 on the workpiece 22, when the workpiece 22 is clamped between the jaws 24 and 26, by changing the geometry of the linkage between the jaw arm 34, the lower arm 52, and the control arm 58. The movement and adjustability are achieved by slidably supporting the upper control arm pivot pin 64 in a pin slot 80 in the jaw arm 34.
As best seen in
An engagement mechanism 86 releasably engages the jaw arm 34 to the upper arm 28, and specifically to the support engagement 46 of the support 44. The releasable engagement is made at an engagement position responsive to a movement of the jaw arm 34 relative to the upper arm 28 and responsive to a size of the workpiece 22 grasped between the upper jaw 24 and the lower jaw 26. (As will be discussed, the preferred engagement mechanism 86 includes a shifter and a pawl, and their related structure.) This engagement prevents further gross rotation of the jaw arm 34 and the remainder of the interconnected unit 73 relative to the upper arm 28 when the workpiece 22 is so grasped with the clamping force determined by the position of the upper control-arm pivot pin 64 in the pin slot 80, although there is a further minor rotation of the jaw arm 34. That is, when the jaws 24 and 26 are separated further than the size of the workpiece 22, the force of the hand of the user on the pads 54 and 56 causes the jaws 24 and 26 to close to contact the workpiece 22 by the rotation of the interconnected unit 73 relative to the upper arm 28 about the main pivot 40. When the jaws 24 and 26 contact the workpiece 22 and as there is an initial application of a small clamping force to the workpiece 22, the engagement mechanism 86 automatically operates to engage the jaw arm 34 and the interconnected unit 73 to the support 44 and thence to the upper arm 28, so that there is no further gross rotation of the interconnected unit 73. The pliers 20 is thereby automatically adjustable to the size of the workpiece 22 being grasped.
The engagement mechanism 86 includes a pivotably supported pawl 88. The pawl 88 rides on the jaw arm 34 in the support engagement slot 48 in facing relation to the support engagement teeth 50. The pawl 88 has pawl teeth 90 thereon. Prior to engagement, the pawl 88 is separated from a side 51 of the support engagement slot 48 that is nearest the jaws 24 and 26. During engagement, the pawl 88 is moved into contact with the side 51 so that the pawl teeth 90 mesh with the support engagement teeth 50 to prevent further upward gross motion of the jaw arm 34. A restraining plate 140 overlies a portion of the pawl 88, holds the pawl on its pawl pivot pin 93, and serves to align and guide the movement of the pawl 88.
The engagement mechanism 86 also includes the shifter 92. The shifter 92, shown in detail in
The shifter 92 is in the form of a thin plate that transfers force. The shifter 92 has three pivot points, including the pawl pivot pin 93, a pinned pivot point 94, and a contact face 98 thereon arranged in a triangular pattern. The pawl pivot pin 93 becomes a pivot point after the pawl 88 is engaged to the support 44, but not prior to that engagement. The pivot point 94 is pivotably connected by a pin to the lower arm 52 at a shifter pin pivot 100. The contact face 98 pivots and slides against, but is not pinned to, the jaw arm 34 at a contact face 104. The pawl 88 is pivotably connected to the central portion of the shifter 92 at the pawl pivot pin 93. (The pawl 88 is not shown in
In operation, starting with the jaws 24 and 26 at their greatest separation, the user grasps the upper arm 28 and the lower arm 52 and moves them toward each other. The interconnected unit 73 rotates relative to the upper arm 28 as a rigid interconnected structure around the main pivot 40. The geometric relationships of the elements of the interconnected unit 73, including the jaw arm 34, the lower arm 52, the control arm 58, and the engagement mechanism 86, is kept rigid by means of an anti-squat mechanism 120 during this initial rotation. The anti-squat mechanism 120 includes the contact face 96 of the shifter 92, and the contact face 102 of the lower jaw 26. An anti-squat spring 122, illustrated as an anti-squat leaf spring, reacting against an upper surface 126 of the shifter 92, holds the contact faces 96 and 102 in contact during this period of rotation of the interconnected unit 73. By keeping the contact faces of 102 and 96 in contact until the lower jaw 26 and the upper jaw face 24 contact the work piece 22, the antisquat mechanism 120 keeps the interconnected unit 73 geometrically rigid until the jaws 24 and 26 touch and begin to apply force to the work piece 22, and additionally prevents the rotation of the shifter 92.
After the jaws 24 and 26 have contacted the workpiece 22 and begun to apply a contact force into the workpiece 22, the contact face 96 lifts up and away from the contact face 102 that is part of the lower jaw 26, against the biasing force of the antisquat leaf spring 122. The shifter 92 rotates clockwise (in the view of the drawings) about the pivot established between the contact surface 98 and the contact face 104. The pawl 88 rotates clockwise about the pawl pivot pin 93 and moves toward the lower jaw 26 to engage the pawl teeth 90 to the support engagement teeth 50. This engagement of the pawl teeth 90 to the support engagement teeth 50 halts further gross rotation and motion of the interconnected unit 73.
For most applications, it is desirable that the contacting force of the jaws 24 and 26 to the workpiece 22 be large in order to ensure that the workpiece is firmly held. To accomplish that result, the shifter achieves a force-multiplier effect wherein the contact force applied to the workpiece 22 is significantly greater than the force produced by the grasping action of the hand of the user. With the illustrated design, the force multiplier is on the order of about 3–4 when friction and other effects are considered, although higher force multipliers are possible in other designs. The force multiplication arises as follows. Once the pawl teeth 90 are engaged to the support engagement teeth 50, the rotational pivot point of the shifter 92 is transferred from the contact face 98 of the shifter 92 to the pawl pivot pin 93. The contact face 98 rides on the inclined contact face 104. The shifter 92 continues to rotate about the pivot pin 93 as the lower arm 52 is moved toward the upper arm 28, producing a further minor rotation of the jaw arm 34. The hand force of the user moving over a longer distance is transferred into the lower jaw 26, which moves a shorter distance but with greater contact force applied to the workpiece 22, than the hand force of the user. The force multiplication is achieved because the contact faces 98 and 104 act as an inclined plane as the shifter 92 rotates. The difference in the length of the lever arm between the locations 93–98 and 93–94 also contributes to the force multiplication.
The release of the force on the lower arm 52 reverses this process, causes the shifter 92 to rotate counterclockwise, disengages the pawl teeth 90 from the engagement teeth 50, allows the lower jaw 26 to move downwardly, and disengages the jaws 24 and 26 from the workpiece 22.
In the use of the pliers 20 just discussed, the jaws 24 and 26 engage and hold the workpiece 22 such that release of the pressure applied to the upper arm 28 and the lower arm 52 immediately releases the workpiece 22. In another embodiment, the jaws 24, 26 may be engaged to the workpiece 22 and releasably locked to the workpiece 22 by a locking mechanism 150, which in this case is an overcenter locking mechanism.
The overcenter locking mechanism 150 with its associated release are conveniently provided by placement of an unlocking lobe 106 on the lower side of the control arm 58. A release arm 108 is pivotably connected to the lower arm 52 and accessible to the hand of the user of the pliers 20 at the end of the lower arm 52 remote from the shifter 92. A release pad 110 on the upper side of the release arm 108 is disposed to contact the unlocking lobe 106 when the release arm 108 is rotated. In operation, the lower control arm pivot point 66 moves to an overcenter position relative to the upper control-arm pivot pin 64 and the pivot pin 94, when the lower arm 52 is moved upwardly to the limit of its travel established by the operation of the engagement mechanism 86. Stated alternatively, when the lower arm 52 is fully open (moved to its downward limit of travel) as in
This type of overcenter locking capability may be provided instead of or in addition to the engaging-but-nonlocking embodiment described previously. The embodiment of
For either the engaging-only or the engaging-and-locking embodiments, it is often helpful to know whether the maximum permissible clamping force, as determined by the position of the upper contact-arm pivot pin 64, has been applied through the jaws 24 and 26 to the workpiece 22. In the presently preferred approach, a force indicator window 130 is provided through each of the sides of the lower arm 52. When the control arm 58 has been sufficiently rotated to correspond to the maximum permissible clamping force, a force indicator 132 is visible through the force indicator window 130. The force indicator 132 is preferably a region of contrasting color on a projection on the side of the control arm 58, for example, a yellow force indicator 132 on a black metallic control arm 58. If the control arm 58 is only partially rotated toward the position associated with less than the maximum contact force on the workpiece 22, the force indicator 132 is not visible thorough the force indicator window 130. If the control arm 58 is fully rotated to the position associated with the maximum contact force on the workpiece 22, the force indicator 132 is visible through the force indicator window 130, giving an indication of this force status to the user of the pliers 20.
Although a particular embodiment of the invention has been described in detail for purposes of illustration, various modifications and enhancements may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be limited except as by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/942,095, filed Aug 28, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,748,829, for which priority is claimed and whose disclosure is incorporated by reference; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/594,191, filed Jun. 14, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,279,431, for which priority is claimed and whose disclosure is incorporated by reference; which in turn is a continuation-in part of application Ser. No. 09/334,055, filed Jun. 15, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,212,978, for which priority is claimed and whose disclosure is incorporated by reference. This application also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/390,007, filed Jun. 18, 2002, whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2112873 | Wright | Apr 1938 | A |
2201918 | Petersen | May 1940 | A |
2428949 | Ward et al. | Oct 1947 | A |
2450791 | Hagen | Oct 1948 | A |
2521276 | Lampe | Sep 1950 | A |
2592803 | Heim | Apr 1952 | A |
3169307 | Langwell | Feb 1965 | A |
3195382 | Rommel et al. | Jul 1965 | A |
3208319 | Westby et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
3241410 | Paden | Mar 1966 | A |
3379079 | Cutter | Apr 1968 | A |
3672245 | Hoffman | Jun 1972 | A |
3884100 | Fideldy | May 1975 | A |
4147077 | Tasato | Apr 1979 | A |
4541312 | Petersen | Sep 1985 | A |
4651598 | Warheit | Mar 1987 | A |
4662252 | Warheit | May 1987 | A |
4730524 | Petersen | Mar 1988 | A |
4744272 | Leatherman | May 1988 | A |
4802390 | Warheit | Feb 1989 | A |
4922770 | Dlugolecke et al. | May 1990 | A |
5020399 | Annis et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5022290 | Duffy | Jun 1991 | A |
5351584 | Warheit | Oct 1994 | A |
5351585 | Leseberg et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5385072 | Neff | Jan 1995 | A |
5408904 | Neff | Apr 1995 | A |
5491856 | Legg | Feb 1996 | A |
5535650 | McNatt | Jul 1996 | A |
5609080 | Flavigny | Mar 1997 | A |
6014917 | Bally et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6065376 | Khachatoorian | May 2000 | A |
6212978 | Seber et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227081 | Bally et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6279431 | Seber et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6467380 | Azkona | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6658971 | Delbrugge et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6748829 | Seber et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1264672 | May 1961 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040045418 A1 | Mar 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60390007 | Jun 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09942095 | Aug 2001 | US |
Child | 10463843 | US | |
Parent | 09594191 | Jun 2000 | US |
Child | 09942095 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09334055 | Jun 1999 | US |
Child | 09594191 | US |