The invention pertains to strobe units that provide visible alarm indications. More particularly, the invention pertains to such units which alter internal operating parameters in response to externally related conditions.
It has been know to use strobe units to provide pulses of visible light, as indicators of an alarm condition, in fire alarm systems and the like. One such strobe has been disclosed in Ha et al. U.S. patent application entitled “Processor Based Strobe with Feedback” application Ser. No. 10/444,227 filed May 23, 2003 and assigned to the Assignee hereof. The disclosure and figures of the '227 application are hereby incorporated herein by reference. U.S. Pat. No. 6,522,261 B2 entitled “Selectable Candela Strobe Unit” which issued Feb. 18, 2003 is assigned to the assignee hereof and is incorporated herein by reference. The '261 patent discloses strobes having variable candela output levels.
Such units, as noted above, while useful require electrical energy to operate. Where numerous strobes are present in an alarm system current demands by such strobes which are often coupled to relatively long power supply lines can cause losses, generate heat, and require supplemental power supplies.
There is thus a continuing need to address strobe unit current demands. It would be desirable to do so transparently from an installer's perspective for different light output settings.
While embodiments of this invention can take many different forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown in the drawings and will be described herein in detail with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the specific embodiment illustrated.
Strobe unit 10 is controlled in an overall fashion by processor 20. Processor 20 in conjunction with a control program prestored in read only memory (EEPROM for example) 22 can carry out a plurality of functions including sensing selected output candela, via model select switch 26, and establishing whether the input power applied via lines 14 is DC or full wave rectified using circuitry 16. Other functionality of the strobe unit 10 is discussed in further detail in the '227 application incorporated herein by reference.
Processor 20 in combination with the control program from read only memory 22 can establish using a prestored lookup table, the target value to which a storage capacitor, a component of the storage capacitor and flash tube element 30 should be charged to output light in accordance with a candela level selected using a model select switch 26. Such processing was also described in detail in the '227 application incorporated herein by reference. As discussed subsequently, unit 10 operates so as to minimize its current requirements.
As noted above, preferably the strobe unit 10 will be operated at a minimal current condition by selecting an appropriate charging frequency for the storage capacitor and flash tube 30 based on selected candela output and available input voltage.
With reference to
The control program, read only memory 22, then checks to determine whether DC input power is present on lines 14, step 126. If so, the control program carries out process 132,
With reference to
It will be understood that other types of processing could be used to determine optimal charging frequency. For example, fuzzy logic or neural net processing could be used. Instead of pre-stored tables, algorithmic processing could be used. Other types of processing come within the spirit and scope of the invention.
The strobe units 54 receive electrical energy, and optionally, control signals via power carrying communication lines 54a, which are coupled to one or more alarm system control units 58. The plurality of ambient condition detectors 56 is also in communication with the control units 58 via communication lines 56a as would be understood by those of skill in the art.
The plurality of strobe units 54, can include the strobe unit 10 which is in turn coupled to the power supply lines 54a via the lines 14. As discussed above, where the strobe units 54 correspond substantially to the strobe unit 10, the plurality 54 operates with minimal required current, on a per strobe unit basis, as discussed above. This is particularly advantageous in that the plurality 54 might contain a large number of units which could potentially draw large amounts of power during an alarm condition. By minimizing the required current, on a per strobe unit basis as discussed above, the plurality 54 can incorporate a larger number of members for the same total current draw than might be the case for a plurality of prior art strobe units which do not carry out the current minimizing processes of the present invention.
Alternately, a single lookup table that describes the relationship between current draw and charge frequency for different candela level at a fixed voltage level can be used. This approach will still be more efficient than using a single charge frequency for all the candela levels. It can be implemented without a need for input voltage information. The fixed voltage level will be established through experimentation to determine what fixed voltage level should be chosen to have the lower current draw.
It will be understood that the exact values of voltages coupled via power line 54a to the plurality of strobe units 54 are not a limitation of the present invention. Similarly, the characteristics of the ambient condition detector 56 as well as the characteristics of the control unit 58 are also not limitations of the present invention.
From the foregoing, it will be observed that numerous variations and modifications may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is to be understood that no limitation with respect to the specific apparatus illustrated herein is intended or should be inferred. It is, of course, intended to cover by the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the scope of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5189344 | Rose | Feb 1993 | A |
5645578 | Daffer et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5931569 | Anderson | Aug 1999 | A |
6271634 | Saiger | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6488390 | Lebens et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6522261 | Scheffler et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6623143 | Anderson | Sep 2003 | B2 |
20040077264 | Walker et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050248291 | Logsdon et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070133199 | Lebens et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060044150 A1 | Mar 2006 | US |