This invention relates to the field of integrated circuit fabrication. More particularly, this invention relates to forming switching structures within integrated circuits.
Carbon nanotube technology is quickly becoming a technological area that is making an impact on the field of microelectronic devices. As the term is used herein, “integrated circuit” includes devices such as those formed on monolithic semiconducting substrates, such as those formed of group IV materials like silicon or germanium, or group III-V compounds like gallium arsenide, or mixtures of such materials. The term includes all types of devices formed, such as memory and logic, and all designs of such devices, such as MOS and bipolar. The term also comprehends applications such as flat panel displays, solar cells, and charge coupled devices.
Single-wall carbon nanotubes are quasi one-dimensional nanowires, which exhibit either metallic or semiconducting properties, depending upon their chirality and radius. Single-wall nanotubes have been demonstrated as both semiconducting layers in thin film transistors as well as metallic interconnects between metal layers.
One technology uses carbon nanotubes as an electromechanical switch for non-volatile memory devices, where the nanotubes are spin-deposited over a patterned substrate surface. The nanotubes 12 lay over trenches 14 between a first electrode 16 and a second electrode 18 of an integrated circuit 10, as depicted in
A two-terminal switching device 20 can be made by over-lapping a metal layer over a nanotube layer 12, as depicted in
Current integration schemes for the two-terminal cell 20 consist of patterning the nanotube layer 12 followed by alignment of the second or programming electrode 18 to overlap the nanotube layer 12 ends by a discrete distance, such as from about twenty-five nanometers to about seventy-five nanometers. The accuracy of the alignment is generally limited by the tolerances of the photolithography tool used, suggesting that electron beam or very short wavelength scanners are preferred to achieve the desired overlap.
What is needed, therefore, are alternate methods for the fabrication of nanotube structures that reduce the dependence of the process on critical alignment tools.
The above and other needs are met by a method of forming a self-aligned logic cell by forming an electrically conductive bottom electrode. A carbon nanotube layer is formed over the bottom electrode with electrical continuity with the bottom electrode. An electrically conductive clamp layer is formed over the nanotube layer with electrical continuity with the nanotube layer. The clamp layer substantially completely covers the nanotube layer, thereby protecting the nanotube layer. An electrically nonconductive dielectric layer is formed over the clamp layer. The dielectric layer is etched with a first etchant that does not substantially etch the clamp layer. The clamp layer provides an etch stop to the first etchant and protects the nanotube layer from the first etchant. A remainder of the dielectric layer is left overlying the bottom electrode.
The clamp layer is etched with an isotropic second etchant that does not substantially etch the dielectric layer and the nanotube layer, and which etches the clamp layer underneath a peripheral edge of the dielectric layer to a substantially uniform and desired degree, thereby creating an overlap of the dielectric layer, and causing a self-alignment between the clamp layer and the overlap of the dielectric layer. An electrically conductive spacer layer is formed over at least the nanotube layer that does not substantially underlie the dielectric layer, the spacer layer having electrical continuity with the nanotube layer. The spacer layer is etched to remove all of the spacer layer except a ring portion circumferentially disposed around the peripheral edge of the dielectric layer and overlying a portion of the nanotube layer. The nanotube layer is etched to remove all of the nanotube layer except those portions of the nanotube layer that are underlying at least one of the clamp layer, the dielectric layer, and the spacer layer, thereby causing a self-alignment between the clamp layer, the overlap to the dielectric layer, the spacer layer, and the nanotube layer.
Because of the method in which the cell is formed, the critical elements of the cell, such as the spacing of the carbon nanotube layer between the electrically conductive electrodes, are self-aligned, thereby reducing alignment errors that might otherwise occur in the fabrication of the cell, that would tend to reduce cell performance and reliability.
According to another aspect of the invention there is described a method of forming a self-aligned logic cell by forming an electrically conductive bottom electrode, and forming a carbon nanotube layer over the bottom electrode with electrical continuity with the bottom electrode. An electrically conductive clamp layer is formed over the nanotube layer with electrical continuity with the nanotube layer, where the clamp layer substantially completely covers the nanotube layer, thereby protecting the nanotube layer. An electrically nonconductive dielectric layer is formed over the clamp layer. The dielectric layer, the clamp layer, and the nanotube layer are etched with a first etchant to produce a stack of the dielectric layer, the clamp layer, and the nanotube layer remaining over the bottom electrode. Each of the dielectric layer, the clamp layer, and the nanotube layer have substantially equal size after the etch. The dielectric layer is etched with a second etchant that does not substantially etch the clamp layer and the nanotube layer, to reduce the size of the dielectric layer and leave a ring portion of the clamp layer exposed around a peripheral edge of the dielectric layer. The clamp layer is etched with an isotropic third etchant that does not substantially etch the dielectric layer and the nanotube layer, and which etches the clamp layer underneath the peripheral edge of the dielectric layer to a substantially uniform and desired degree, thereby creating an overlap of the dielectric layer, and causing a self-alignment between the clamp layer, the overlap of the dielectric layer, and the nanotube layer.
Further advantages of the invention are apparent by reference to the detailed description when considered in conjunction with the figures, which are not to scale so as to more clearly show the details, wherein like reference numbers indicate like elements throughout the several views, and wherein:
By employing a self-aligned method as described herein, the effect of the tolerance of the photolithography tool is dramatically reduced and preferably eliminated. The following embodiments describe two examples of self-alignment methods that create the desired overlap.
As depicted in
As depicted in
As depicted in
Next, a pad metal layer 40 is deposited, such as of at least one of Al and TiN, and optionally planarized, such as with a chemical mechanical planarization, as depicted in
The cell 20 operates by applying a program voltage pulse between the bottom electrode 16 and the top electrode 40, which causes the nanotube layer 12 to “heal” any voltage-induced cracks and become conductive between the bottom electrode 16 and the top electrode 40, for an “on-state” condition. An erase voltage pulse is applied between the bottom electrode 16 and the top electrode 40, which causes the nanotube layer 12 to sever and become nonconductive between the bottom electrode 16 and the top electrode 40, for an “off-state” condition. Thus, the erase pulse causes physical bond breaking of the nanotubes 12, while a program pulse creates an electrostatic attraction between the severed ends of the nanotubes 12, thereby bringing them back in contact.
As depicted in
As depicted in
The dielectric layer 36 is then reduced such as with a wet isotropic etch of HF:H2O, as depicted in
A combination spacer metal layer and pad metal layer 40 is then deposited as a single layer, formed of a material such as one or more of Al and TiN, as depicted in
These embodiments describe a self-aligned process that produces a small, controlled overlap of the program metal with the exposed ends of the nanotube layer 12, and produces a self-passivating nanotube layer 12. The size of the cell 20 produced is scalable to any technology node, with the scaling dimensions of the cell 20 being proportional to the size of the underlying contact electrode. The formation of the sealed cavity 14 separates the program electrode and the contact electrode without exposing the nanotube layer 12 to a plasma, which would be detrimental to it. The methods provide independent control of the spacing between the two electrodes and overlap of the nanotube layer 12. The electrode spacing is independent of the alignment to the contact electrode. These methods can be integrated to the process flow between any of the existing metal layers in the fabrication process of the integrated circuit. Further, the processes can be extended vertically to have multiple layers of the memory elements between each metal layer. Only two masking steps are required to build the cells 20.
In the first embodiment above, an inter-metallic dielectric layer wet etch can be used to undercut the ends of the nanotube layer 12 after the metal spacer 34 etch, thereby creating a cavity, which is then enclosed during the pad metal 40 deposition. Also in embodiment one, the spacer electrode 34 can be selectively removed by wet or isotropic dry etch to limit the program electrode area to the pad electrode 40. In both of the two embodiments, the pad electrode 40 can be formed using a damascene scheme instead of the subtractive schemes described above.
The foregoing description of preferred embodiments for this invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Obvious modifications or variations are possible in light of the above teachings. The embodiments are chosen and described in an effort to provide the best illustrations of the principles of the invention and its practical application, and to thereby enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the invention as determined by the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally, and equitably entitled.
This application claims priority on provisional patent application 60/688,846, filed Jun. 8, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4979149 | Popovic et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
6057637 | Zettl et al. | May 2000 | A |
6100109 | Melzner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128214 | Kuekes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6187823 | Haddon | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6250984 | Jin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256767 | Kuekes et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277318 | Bower et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6314019 | Kuekes et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331262 | Haddon | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342276 | You et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6368569 | Haddon | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6409567 | Amey, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423583 | Avouris et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426687 | Osborn | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6443901 | Fraser | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6445006 | Brandes et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6495116 | Herman | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6495258 | Chen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
7566478 | Ward | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6515339 | Shin et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6528020 | Dai et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6548841 | Frazier et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6630772 | Bower et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6645628 | Shiffler, Jr. et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6707098 | Hofmann et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6759693 | Vogeli et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6803840 | Hunt et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6808746 | Dai et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6809462 | Pelrine et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809465 | Jin | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6833558 | Lee et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6858197 | Delzeit | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6863942 | Ren et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6896864 | Clarke | May 2005 | B2 |
6899945 | Smalley et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6918284 | Snow et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919592 | Segal et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919740 | Snider | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921575 | Horiuchi et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924538 | Jaiprakash et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6946410 | French et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955937 | Burke et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6969651 | Lu et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6990009 | Bertin et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7015500 | Choi et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7057402 | Cole et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7115864 | Colbert | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7115901 | Bertin et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7115960 | Bertin | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7161403 | Bertin | Jan 2007 | B2 |
20010004979 | Han et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010023986 | Mancevski | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020081380 | Dillon | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020160111 | Sun et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020175390 | Goldstein et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030004058 | Li et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030122111 | Glatkowski | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030177450 | Nugent | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200521 | DeHon et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040005723 | Empedocles et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040007528 | Bakajin et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023253 | Kunwar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031975 | Kern et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041154 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040043527 | Bradley et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040071949 | Glatkowski et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099438 | Arthur et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104129 | Gu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040238907 | Pinkerton et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253167 | Silva et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265550 | Glatkowski et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050053525 | Segal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050056877 | Rueckes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065741 | Segal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068128 | Yip | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083635 | Ooma et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050095938 | Rosenberger et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060052509 | Saitoh | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060183278 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060204427 | Ghenciu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060237537 | Empedocles et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060237799 | Lu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060258122 | Whitefield et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060278902 | Sun et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070003472 | Tolt | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070004191 | Gu et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 364 933 | Feb 2002 | GB |
2000203821 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2001-035362 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2004-090208 | Mar 2004 | JP |
WO-9839250 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO-9965821 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO-0048195 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO-0103208 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-03034142 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-0248701 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO-03016901 | Feb 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060281256 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60688846 | Jun 2005 | US |