The present disclosure relates to sensors for chemical analysis, and to methods for manufacturing such sensors.
A variety of types of chemical sensors have been used in the detection of various chemical processes. One type is a chemically-sensitive field effect transistor (chemFET). A chemFET includes a source and a drain separated by a channel region, and a chemically sensitive area coupled to the channel region. The operation of the chemFET is based on the modulation of channel conductance, caused by changes in charge at the sensitive area due to a chemical reaction occurring nearby. The modulation of the channel conductance changes the threshold voltage of the chemFET, which can be measured to detect and/or determine characteristics of the chemical reaction. The threshold voltage may for example be measured by applying appropriate bias voltages to the source and drain, and measuring a resulting current flowing through the chemFET. As another example, the threshold voltage may be measured by driving a known current through the chemFET, and measuring a resulting voltage at the source or drain.
An ion-sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) is a type of chemFET that includes an ion-sensitive layer at the sensitive area. The presence of ions in an analyte solution alters the surface potential at the interface between the ion-sensitive layer and the analyte solution, due to the protonation or deprotonation of surface charge groups at the sensitive area caused by the ions present in the analyte solution. The change in surface potential at the sensitive area of the ISFET affects the threshold voltage of the device, which can be measured to indicate the presence and/or concentration of ions within the solution.
Arrays of ISFETs may be used for monitoring chemical reactions, such as DNA sequencing reactions, based on the detection of ions present, generated, or used during the reactions. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,948,015 to Rothberg et al., which is incorporated by reference herein. More generally, large arrays of chemFETs or other types of chemical sensors may be employed to detect and measure static and/or dynamic amounts or concentrations of a variety of analytes (e.g. hydrogen ions, other ions, compounds, etc.) in a variety of processes. The processes may for example be biological or chemical reactions, cell or tissue cultures or monitoring, neural activity, nucleic acid sequencing, etc.
A specific issue that arises in the operation of chemical sensor arrays is the susceptibility of the sensor output signals to noise. Specifically, the noise affects the accuracy of the downstream signal processing used to determine the characteristics of the chemical and/or biological process being detected by the sensors.
It is therefore desirable to provide devices including low noise chemical sensors, and methods for manufacturing such devices.
In one implementation, a method for forming a chemical detection device is described. The method includes forming a gate dielectric on a semiconductor substrate. A floating gate structure is formed on the gate dielectric. Forming the floating gate structure includes forming a conductive material overlying the gate dielectric, forming a sacrificial material overlying the conductive material, and patterning the conductive material and the sacrificial material. A fill material is formed adjacent to the patterned sacrificial material and the patterned conductive material. The patterned sacrificial material is then removed to define a reaction region substantially aligned with the patterned conductive material.
In another implementation, a chemical detection device is described. The device includes a chemically-sensitive field effect transistor including a floating gate conductor coupled to a gate dielectric and having an upper surface, and a sensing material on the upper surface. The device also includes a fill material defining a reaction region extending above the sensing material, the reaction region overlying and substantially aligned with the floating gate conductor.
Particular aspects of one more implementations of the subject matter described in this specification are set forth in the drawings and the description below. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
A chemical detection device is described that includes low noise chemical sensors, such as chemically-sensitive field effect transistors (chemFETs), for detecting chemical reactions within overlying, operationally associated reaction regions.
It has been found that a significant amount of the total noise in chemical sensors, such as chemFETs, can be attributed to etching processes involved in defining the overlying reaction regions. In particular, forming the reaction region through an overlying material by subjecting the sensing surface of a chemical sensor to prolonged periods of a high-energy directional etching process can cause significant noise in the sensor. For example, plasma impinging on the sensing surface can cause charge build up, to the point of causing undesirable changes or damage within the sensor. This accumulated charge can become trapped in the gate oxide and/or the gate oxide-semiconductor substrate interface of the chemFETs, thereby contributing to the noise and resulting in variations in operation and degradation in performance.
Techniques are described herein for forming a reaction region overlying the sensing surface of a chemical sensor, using a self-aligned process that does not require the sensing surface to be subjected to an etching process. In exemplary embodiments, an upper floating gate conductor element of the chemical sensor and an overlying sacrificial material element are patterned together to form a stack. Following the formation of a fill material adjacent to the stack, the sacrificial material element can then be selectively removed to define the reaction region, using a non-etch process that does not contribute to charge accumulation. In embodiments in which the sacrificial material element comprises thermally decomposable material, the non-etching process may involve heating the device to thermally decompose and evaporate the sacrificial material element to form the reaction region, without damaging the sensing surface or removing the fill material.
As a result of the techniques described herein, low noise chemical sensors with uniform performance across an array are provided, such that the characteristics of subsequent chemical reactions can be accurately detected.
The reference electrode 108 may be of any suitable type or shape, including a concentric cylinder with a fluid passage or a wire inserted into a lumen of passage 111. The reagents 114 may be driven through the fluid pathways, valves, and flow cell 101 by pumps, gas pressure, or other suitable methods, and may be discarded into the waste container 106 after exiting the outlet 103 of the flow cell 101. The fluidics controller 118 may control driving forces for the reagents 114 and the operation of valve 112 and valve block 116 with suitable software.
The microwell array 107 includes an array of reaction regions as described herein, also referred to herein as microwells, which are operationally associated with corresponding chemical sensors in the sensor array. For example, each reaction region may be coupled to a chemical sensor suitable for detecting an analyte or reaction property of interest within that reaction region. The microwell array 107 may be integrated in the integrated circuit device 100, so that the microwell array 107 and the sensor array are part of a single device or chip.
The flow cell 101 may have a variety of configurations for controlling the path and flow rate of reagents 114 over the microwell array 107. The array controller 124 provides bias voltages and timing and control signals to the integrated circuit device 100 for reading the chemical sensors of the sensor array. The array controller 124 also provides a reference bias voltage to the reference electrode 108 to bias the reagents 114 flowing over the microwell array 107.
During an experiment, the array controller 124 collects and processes output signals from the chemical sensors of the sensor array through output ports on the integrated circuit device 100 via bus 127. The array controller 124 may be a computer or other computing means. The array controller 124 may include memory for storage of data and software applications, a processor for accessing data and executing applications, and components that facilitate communication with the various components of the system in
The values of the output signals of the chemical sensors indicate physical and/or chemical parameters of one or more reactions taking place in the corresponding reaction regions in the microwell array 107. For example, in an exemplary embodiment, the values of the output signals may be processed using the techniques disclosed in Rearick et al., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/339,846, filed Dec. 29, 2011, based on U.S. Prov. Pat. Appl. Nos. 61/428,743, filed Dec. 30, 2010, and 61/429,328, filed Jan. 3, 2011, and in Hubbell, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/339,753, filed Dec. 29, 2011, based on U.S. Prov. Pat. Appl. No. 61/428,097, filed Dec. 29, 2010, which are all incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The user interface 128 may display information about the flow cell 101 and the output signals received from chemical sensors in the sensor array on the integrated circuit device 100. The user interface 128 may also display instrument settings and controls, and allow a user to enter or set instrument settings and controls.
In an exemplary embodiment, during the experiment the fluidics controller 118 may control delivery of the individual reagents 114 to the flow cell 101 and integrated circuit device 100 in a predetermined sequence, for predetermined durations, at predetermined flow rates. The array controller 124 can then collect and analyze the output signals of the chemical sensors indicating chemical reactions occurring in response to the delivery of the reagents 114.
During the experiment, the system may also monitor and control the temperature of the integrated circuit device 100, so that reactions take place and measurements are made at a known predetermined temperature.
The system may be configured to let a single fluid or reagent contact the reference electrode 108 throughout an entire multi-step reaction during operation. The valve 112 may be shut to prevent any wash solution 110 from flowing into passage 109 as the reagents 114 are flowing. Although the flow of wash solution may be stopped, there may still be uninterrupted fluid and electrical communication between the reference electrode 108, passage 109, and the microwell array 107. The distance between the reference electrode 108 and the junction between passages 109 and 111 may be selected so that little or no amount of the reagents flowing in passage 109 and possibly diffusing into passage 111 reach the reference electrode 108. In an exemplary embodiment, the wash solution 110 may be selected as being in continuous contact with the reference electrode 108, which may be especially useful for multi-step reactions using frequent wash steps.
The chemical sensors of the sensor array 205 are responsive to (and generate output signals) chemical reactions within associated reaction regions in the microwell array 107 to detect an analyte or reaction property of interest. The chemical sensors of the sensor array 205 may for example be chemically sensitive field-effect transistors (chemFETs), such as ion-sensitive field effect transistors (ISFETs). Examples of chemical sensors and array configurations that may be used in embodiments are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0300559, No. 2010/0197507, No. 2010/0301398, No. 2010/0300895, No. 2010/0137143, and No. 2009/0026082, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,865, each which are incorporated by reference herein.
Chemical sensor 350 is coupled to corresponding reaction region 301, and chemical sensor 351 is coupled to corresponding reaction region 302. Chemical sensor 350 is representative of the chemical sensors in the sensor array. In the illustrated example, the chemical sensor 350 is an ion-sensitive field effect transistor. The chemical sensor 350 includes a floating gate structure 318 having a floating gate conductor (referred to herein as the sensor plate 320) separated from the reaction region 301 by sensing material 316. As shown in
In the illustrated example, the floating gate structure 318 includes multiple patterned layers of conductive material within layers of dielectric material 319. As described in more detail below, the upper surface of the sensing material 316 acts as the sensing surface 317 for the chemical sensor 350.
In the illustrated embodiment, the sensing material 316 is an ion-sensitive material, such that the presence of ions or other charged species in a solution in the reaction region 301 alters the surface potential of the sensing surface 317. The change in the surface potential is due to the protonation or deprotonation of surface charge groups at the sensing surface caused by the ions present in the solution. The sensing material 316 may be deposited using various techniques, or naturally formed during one or more of the manufacturing processes used to form the chemical sensor 350. In some embodiments, the sensing material 316 is a metal oxide, such as an oxide of silicon, tantalum, aluminum, lanthanum, titanium, zirconium, hafnium, tungsten, palladium, iridium, etc.
In some embodiments, the sensing material 316 is an oxide of the upper layer of conductive material of the sensor plate 320. For example, the upper layer of the sensor plate 320 may be titanium nitride, and the sensing material 316 may comprise titanium oxide or titanium oxynitride. More generally, the sensing material 316 may comprise one or more of a variety of different materials to facilitate sensitivity to particular ions. For example, silicon nitride or silicon oxynitride, as well as metal oxides such as silicon oxide, aluminum or tantalum oxides, generally provide sensitivity to hydrogen ions, whereas sensing materials comprising polyvinyl chloride containing valinomycin provide sensitivity to potassium ions. Materials sensitive to other ions such as sodium, silver, iron, bromine, iodine, calcium, and nitrate may also be used, depending upon the implementation.
The chemical sensor 350 also includes a source region 321 and a drain region 322 within a semiconductor substrate 354. The source region 321 and the drain region 322 comprise doped semiconductor material have a conductivity type different from the conductivity type of the substrate 354. For example, the source region 321 and the drain region 322 may comprise doped P-type semiconductor material, and the substrate may comprise doped N-type semiconductor material.
Channel region 323 separates the source region 321 and the drain region 322. The floating gate structure 318 overlies the channel region 323, and is separated from the substrate 354 by a gate dielectric 352. The gate dielectric 352 may be for example silicon dioxide. Alternatively, other dielectrics may be used for the gate dielectric 352.
As shown in
The opening includes a sidewall 303 extending to the bottom surface of the sensor plate 320 of the floating gate structure 318. As a result of this structure, a lower portion 314 of the opening contains the sensing material 316 and the sensor plate 320. An upper portion 315 of the opening extends from the lower portion 314 to the upper surface of the fill material 310 to define the reaction region 301.
As described in more detail below with respect to
As a result of the self-aligned process described herein, the microwell 301 is substantially aligned with the sensor plate 320 of the floating gate structure 318. As used herein, elements or features that are “substantially aligned” have sidewalls substantially flush with a plane parallel to the sidewalls, where “substantially flush” is intended to accommodate manufacturing tolerances using a single etch mask which may cause variations in the planarity of the sidewalls. As a result, as shown in
The sacrificial material element comprises sacrificial material which can be selectively removed relative to the fill material 310, when subjected to a chosen process which does not contribute charge accumulation on the floating gate structure 318. In exemplary embodiments described herein, the chosen process is a non-etch process. Etching is a process for removing material by using a wet etchant or reactive ionic particles that chemically react with the material.
For example, the sacrificial material element may comprise a thermally decomposable material, such as a polymer having a relatively low thermal decomposition temperature. The sacrificial material element may for example comprise a Unity® polymer from Promerus Inc., such as polypropylene carbonate (PPC), polyethylene carbonate (PEC), polycyclohexanepropylene carbonate (PCPC), polycyclohexane carbonate (PCC), polynorbornene carbonate (PNC), polybutylnorbornene (PNB), etc.
During manufacturing, the structure can then be heated to a temperature at or above the thermal decomposition temperature of the sacrificial material element, such that the sacrificial material element thermally decomposes and evaporates. The temperature and the amount the time the device is heated depends on the selected material for the sacrificial material element, as well as its thickness, and can be determined empirically.
Alternatively, the sacrificial material element may comprise other materials which can be selectively removed relative to the fill material 310, when subjected to a chosen process. For example, the sacrificial material element may comprise a dielectric material that can be selectively etched using for example a wet etch process, or a low power plasma etch process that does not contribute significant charge accumulation on the floating gate structure 318. In one embodiment, the sacrificial material element is silicon dioxide, the fill material is silicon nitride, and a wet etchant such as buffered oxide etch (BOE) is performed to selectively remove the sacrificial material element. Alternatively other materials and/or wet etchants may be used.
The fill material 310 may for example comprise one or more layers of dielectric material, such as silicon dioxide or silicon nitride. Alternatively, in some embodiments, the fill material 310 is a thermally decomposable material. In such a case, the sacrificial material element comprises material having a decomposition temperature less than that of the fill material 310. The structure can then be heated to a temperature at or above the thermal decomposition temperature of the sacrificial material element, but below the thermal decomposition temperature of the fill material 310, such that the sacrificial material element thermally decomposes and evaporates without damaging or removing the fill material 310. In doing so, the shape of the sacrificial material element becomes the shape of the reaction region 301. In one implementation, the sacrificial material element is a Unity® polymer from Promerus Inc. which decomposes at a temperature above 200 degrees Celsius, and the fill material 310 is for example polymide, which decomposes at a temperature above 400 degrees Celsius.
The sacrificial material element protects the upper surface of the sensing material 316, acts as the sensing surface 317 for the chemical sensor 350, during the patterning process used to form the stack. In doing so, damage to the sensing surface 317 can be avoided. In addition, by selectively removing the sacrificial material element using a non-etch process which does not accumulate charge on the floating gate structure 318 (e.g. heating to cause thermal decomposition of the material), noise induced in the chemical sensor 350 during the formation of the reaction region 301 can be eliminated. As a result, the techniques described herein can be used to form low noise chemical sensors having uniform performance across an array, such that the characteristics of chemical reactions can be accurately measured.
The sensor plate 320 and the sensing material 316 may for example have circular cross-sections, which results in the opening and the reaction region 301 having circular cross-sections. Alternatively, these may be non-circular. For example, the cross-section may be square, rectangular, hexagonal, or irregularly shaped.
In operation, reactants, wash solutions, and other reagents may move in and out of the reaction region 301 by a diffusion mechanism 340. The chemical sensor 350 is responsive to (and generates an output signal related to) the amount of a charge 324 present on the sensing material 316 opposite the sensor plate 320. Changes in the charge 324 cause changes in the voltage on the floating gate structure 318, which in turn changes in the threshold voltage of the transistor. This change in threshold voltage can be measured by measuring the current in the channel region 323 between the source region 321 and a drain region 322. As a result, the chemical sensor 350 can be used directly to provide a current-based output signal on an array line connected to the source region 321 or drain region 322, or indirectly with additional circuitry to provide a voltage-based output signal.
In an embodiment, reactions carried out in the reaction region 301 can be analytical reactions to identify or determine characteristics or properties of an analyte of interest. Such reactions can generate directly or indirectly byproducts that affect the amount of charge adjacent to the sensor plate 320. If such byproducts are produced in small amounts or rapidly decay or react with other constituents, multiple copies of the same analyte may be analyzed in the reaction region 301 at the same time in order to increase the output signal generated. In an embodiment, multiple copies of an analyte may be attached to a solid phase support 312, either before or after deposition into the reaction region 301. The solid phase support 312 may be microparticles, nanoparticles, beads, solid or porous comprising gels, or the like. For simplicity and ease of explanation, solid phase support 312 is also referred herein as a particle. For a nucleic acid analyte, multiple, connected copies may be made by rolling circle amplification (RCA), exponential RCA, or like techniques, to produce an amplicon without the need of a solid support.
In various exemplary embodiments, the methods, systems, and computer readable media described herein may advantageously be used to process and/or analyze data and signals obtained from electronic or charged-based nucleic acid sequencing. In electronic or charged-based sequencing (such as, pH-based sequencing), a nucleotide incorporation event may be determined by detecting ions (e.g., hydrogen ions) that are generated as natural by-products of polymerase-catalyzed nucleotide extension reactions. This may be used to sequence a sample or template nucleic acid, which may be a fragment of a nucleic acid sequence of interest, for example, and which may be directly or indirectly attached as a clonal population to a solid support, such as a particle, microparticle, bead, etc. The sample or template nucleic acid may be operably associated to a primer and polymerase and may be subjected to repeated cycles or “flows” of deoxynucleoside triphosphate (“dNTP”) addition (which may be referred to herein as “nucleotide flows” from which nucleotide incorporations may result) and washing. The primer may be annealed to the sample or template so that the primer's 3′ end can be extended by a polymerase whenever dNTPs complementary to the next base in the template are added. Then, based on the known sequence of nucleotide flows and on measured output signals of the chemical sensors indicative of ion concentration during each nucleotide flow, the identity of the type, sequence and number of nucleotide(s) associated with a sample nucleic acid present in a reaction region coupled to a chemical sensor can be determined.
The structure 400 can be formed by depositing a layer of gate dielectric material on the semiconductor substrate 354, and depositing a layer of polysilicon (or other electrically conductive material) on the layer of gate dielectric material. The layer of polysilicon and the layer gate dielectric material can then be etched using an etch mask to form the gate dielectric elements (e.g. gate dielectric 352) and the lowermost conductive material element of the floating gate structures (e.g. conductive material element 412 of floating gate structure 410). Following formation of an ion-implantation mask, ion implantation can then be performed to form the source and drain regions (e.g. source region 321 and a drain region 322) of the chemical sensors.
A first layer of the dielectric material 319 can then be deposited over the lowermost conductive material elements. Conductive plugs can then be formed within vias etched in the first layer of dielectric material 319 to contact the lowermost conductive material elements of the floating gate structures. A layer of conductive material can then be deposited on the first layer of the dielectric material 319 and patterned to form second conductive material elements electrically connected to the conductive plugs. This process can then be repeated multiple times to form the partially completed floating gate structures shown in
Forming the structure 400 can also include forming additional elements such as array lines (e.g. word lines, bit lines, etc.) for accessing the chemical sensors, additional doped regions in the substrate 354, and other circuitry (e.g. access circuitry, bias circuitry etc.) used to operate the chemical sensors, depending upon the device and array configuration in which the chemical sensors described herein are implemented. In some embodiments, the elements of the structure 400 may for example be manufactured using techniques described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0300559, No. 2010/0197507, No. 2010/0301398, No. 2010/0300895, No. 2010/0137143, and No. 2009/0026082, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,865, each which are incorporated by reference herein.
Next, conductive material 500 is formed on the structure illustrated in
The conductive material 500 comprises one or more layers of electrically conductive material. For example, the conductive material 500 may include a layer of titanium nitride formed on a layer of aluminum, or a layer of titanium nitride formed on a layer of copper. Alternatively, the number of layers may be different than two, and other and/or additional conductive materials may be used. Examples of conductive materials that can be used in some embodiments include tantalum, aluminum, lanthanum, titanium, zirconium, hafnium, tungsten, palladium, iridium, etc., and combinations thereof.
The sensing material 510 may comprise one or more layers of material, such as those materials discussed above with respect to the ion-sensitive layer 316 of
Alternatively, rather than separately depositing the sensing material 510, the sensing material 510 may be grown as an oxide of the upper layer of conductive material 500. In such a case, after depositing the conductive material, an oxidation process may for example be performed to oxidize the conductive material 500 to create the sensing material 510.
As described in more detail below, the thickness of the sacrificial material 520 defines the depth of the subsequently formed reaction regions. The sacrificial material 520 may be deposited using various techniques, depending on the material. For example, in embodiments in which the sacrificial material 520 has a relatively low decomposition temperature, so that it can subsequently be thermally decomposed, it may be spin coated. Alternatively, other techniques may be used. For example, the sacrificial material may be formed by sputtering, ALD, LPCVD, PECVD, MOCVD, MOVPE, spray coating etc.
The mask elements 530, 532 define the locations of the reaction regions and the sensor plates of the corresponding chemical sensors. In the illustrated embodiment, the mask elements 530, 532 comprise photoresist material which has been patterned using a lithographic process. Alternatively, other techniques and materials may be used.
Next, an etching or other patterning process is performed on the structure illustrated in
The etching process defines multi-layer stacks 600, 602 beneath the mask elements 530, 532 respectively. The multi-layer stack 600 includes conductive material element 610 of conductive material 500 in electrical contact with the partial floating gate structure 410 (see
The multi-layer stack 600 also includes a sensing material element 620 of patterned sensing material 510 on the conductive material element 610, and a sacrificial material element 630 of patterned sacrificial material 520 on the sensing material element 620.
The cross-sectional shapes of the multi-layer stacks 600, 602 depend on the cross-sectional shapes of the mask elements 530, 532. These cross-sections may for example be circular. Alternatively, these may be non-circular. For example, the cross-section may be square, rectangular, hexagonal, or irregularly shaped.
In the illustrated embodiment, the mask elements 530, 532 are used as etch masks for the etching process. In some alternative embodiments, the mask elements 530, 532 may be omitted, and the sacrificial material 520 comprises a material that is photosensitive (photodefinable). In such a case, the locations of the multi-layer stacks 600, 602 can be defined by projecting an image onto the sacrificial material 520 using a lithographic process. After exposure, the sacrificial material 520 can then be removed from the undesired locations to form the sacrificial material elements of the multi-layer stacks 600, 602. The sacrificial material elements can then be used as etch masks during etching through the conductive material 500 to complete the multi-layer stacks 600, 602.
Next, fill material 310 is deposited on the structure illustrated in
The fill material 310 may comprise one or more layers of various materials, and may be deposited using various techniques. In the illustrated embodiment, the fill material 310 is a high temperature polymer such as polyimide, TEFLON, etc. and is deposited by spin coating. Alternatively, other materials and formation techniques may be used.
In the illustrated embodiment, the planarization process used to expose the patterned sacrificial material of the multi-layer stacks 600, 602 is a chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process. Alternatively, other planarization processes may be used.
Next, the sacrificial material elements of the multi-layer stacks 600, 602 are selectively removed to define respective reaction regions 301, 302 for the corresponding chemical sensors, resulting in the structure illustrated in
In the illustrated example, the sacrificial material and the fill material 310 are each thermally decomposable material, and the sacrificial material has a decomposition temperature less than that of the fill material 310. The structure is then heated (e.g. in a furnace) to a temperature at or above the thermal decomposition temperature of the sacrificial material, but below the thermal decomposition temperature of the fill material 310, such that the sacrificial material element thermally decomposes and evaporates without damaging or removing the fill material 310. In doing so, the fill material 310 retains the shape of the sacrificial material element as the shape of the reaction region 301.
Alternatively, as described above, other techniques may be used to selectively remove (e.g. selectively wet etch) the sacrificial material.
The sacrificial material element protects the upper surface of the ion-sensitive layer 316 during the patterning process used to form the stack. In doing so, damage to the sensing surface of the chemical sensor can be avoided. In addition, by selectively removing the sacrificial material element using for example a non-etch process which does not accumulate charge on the floating gate structure (e.g. heating to cause thermal decomposition of the material), noise induced in the chemical sensor during the formation of the reaction region can be eliminated. As a result, the techniques described herein can be used to form low noise chemical sensors having uniform performance across an array, such that the characteristics of chemical reactions can be accurately measured.
While the present invention is disclosed by reference to the preferred embodiments and examples detailed above, it is to be understood that these examples are intended in an illustrative rather than in a limiting sense. It is contemplated that modifications and combinations will readily occur to those skilled in the art, which modifications and combinations will be within the spirit of the invention and the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4086642 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4411741 | Janata | Oct 1983 | A |
4490678 | Kuisl et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4641084 | Komatsu | Feb 1987 | A |
4691167 | Vlekkert et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4701253 | Litenberg et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4722830 | Urie et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4743954 | Brown | May 1988 | A |
4764797 | Shaw et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4777019 | Dandekar | Oct 1988 | A |
4822566 | Newman | Apr 1989 | A |
4863849 | Melamede | Sep 1989 | A |
4864229 | Lauks et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4874499 | Smith et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4971903 | Hyman | Nov 1990 | A |
5009766 | Lauks | Apr 1991 | A |
5038192 | Bonneau | Aug 1991 | A |
5110441 | Kinlen et al. | May 1992 | A |
5113870 | Rossenfeld | May 1992 | A |
5138251 | Koshiishi et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5151759 | Vinal | Sep 1992 | A |
5164319 | Hafeman et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5284566 | Cuomo et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5317407 | Michon | May 1994 | A |
5319226 | Sohn et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5407854 | Baxter et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5436149 | Barnes | Jul 1995 | A |
5439839 | Jang | Aug 1995 | A |
5466348 | Holm-Kennedy | Nov 1995 | A |
5490971 | Gifford et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5554339 | Cozzette et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5583462 | Grasshoff | Dec 1996 | A |
5593838 | Zanzucchi et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600451 | Maki | Feb 1997 | A |
5631704 | Dickinson et al. | May 1997 | A |
5637469 | Wilding et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5702964 | Lee | Dec 1997 | A |
5793230 | Chu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5846708 | Hollis et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5911873 | McCarron et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5912560 | Pasternak | Jun 1999 | A |
5922591 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923421 | Rajic et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5958703 | Dower et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965452 | Kovacs | Oct 1999 | A |
6002299 | Thomsen | Dec 1999 | A |
6107032 | Kilger et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6195585 | Karunasiri et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210891 | Nyren et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6255678 | Sawada et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262568 | Komatsu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274320 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6327410 | Walt et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355431 | Chee et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361671 | Mathies et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6384684 | Redman-White | May 2002 | B1 |
6403957 | Fodor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406848 | Bridgham et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413792 | Sauer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429027 | Chee et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432360 | Church | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433386 | Yun et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459398 | Gureshnik et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6465178 | Chappa et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475728 | Martin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482639 | Snow et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485944 | Church et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490220 | Merritt et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499499 | Dantsker et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6518024 | Choong et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6518146 | Singh et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535824 | Mansky et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537881 | Rangarajan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538593 | Yang et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6545620 | Groeneweg | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6571189 | Jensen et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6602702 | McDevitt et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605428 | Klinger et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613513 | Parce et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624637 | Pechstein et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627154 | Goodman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6654505 | Bridgham et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657269 | Migliorato et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6682899 | Bryan et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682936 | Kovacs | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6700814 | Nahas et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6703660 | Yitzchaik et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716629 | Hess et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6762022 | Makarov et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770472 | Manalis et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780591 | Williams et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6806052 | Bridgham et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6828100 | Ronaghi | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6831994 | Bridgham et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6841128 | Kambara et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859570 | Walt et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6888194 | Yoshino | May 2005 | B2 |
6898121 | Chien et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6906524 | Chung et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6919211 | Fodor et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6926865 | Howard | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6927045 | Hadd et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6929944 | Matson | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939451 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6953958 | Baxter et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958216 | Kelley et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6969488 | Bridgham et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6998274 | Chee et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008550 | Li et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019305 | Eversmann et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022288 | Boss | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7033754 | Chee et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037687 | Williams et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045097 | Kovacs | May 2006 | B2 |
7049645 | Sawada et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7060431 | Chee et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067886 | Bonges et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7084641 | Brederlow et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7085502 | Shushakob et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087387 | Gerdes et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090975 | Schultz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091059 | Rhodes | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092757 | Larson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097973 | Zenhausern | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7105300 | Parce et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7129554 | Lieber et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7169560 | Lapidus et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7190026 | Lotfi | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7192745 | Jaeger | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193453 | Wei et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7211390 | Rothberg et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7220550 | Keen | May 2007 | B2 |
7223540 | Pourmand et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226734 | Chee et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229799 | Williams et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235389 | Lim et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7238323 | Knapp et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7244559 | Rothberg et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7244567 | Chen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7264929 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7264934 | Fuller | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7265929 | Umeda et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7267751 | Gelbart et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7276749 | Martin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279588 | Hong et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7282370 | Bridgham et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285384 | Fan et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291496 | Holm-Kennedy | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297518 | Quake et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7298475 | Gandhi et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7303875 | Bock et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7317216 | Holm-Kennedy | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323305 | Leamon et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7335526 | Peters et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7335762 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7359058 | Kranz et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363717 | Ekseth et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381936 | Tan et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7394263 | Pechstein et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7419636 | Aker et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7425431 | Church et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7455971 | Chee et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462452 | Williams et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7462512 | Levon et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7462709 | Jaeger | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7465512 | Wright et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7466258 | Akopyan et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7470352 | Eversmann et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7476504 | Turner | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7482153 | Okada et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7482677 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7515124 | Yaguma et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7534097 | Wong et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7538827 | Chou | May 2009 | B2 |
7575865 | Leamon et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7576037 | Engelhardt et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7595883 | El Gamal et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7605650 | Forbes | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608810 | Yamada | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609093 | Sarig et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609303 | Lee | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7612369 | Stasiak | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7612817 | Tay | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7614135 | Santini et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7622294 | Walt et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7645596 | Williams et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7649358 | Toumazou et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7667501 | Surendranath et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7686929 | Toumazou et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7695907 | Miyahara et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7733401 | Takeda | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7772383 | Chakrabarti et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785785 | Pourmand et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785790 | Church et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7794584 | Chodavarapu et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7821806 | Horiuchi | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7838226 | Kamahori et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7842377 | Lanphere et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7842457 | Berka et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7859029 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7859291 | Kim | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7875440 | Williams et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7884398 | Levon et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7885490 | Heideman et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888013 | Miyahara et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888015 | Toumazou et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888708 | Yazawa et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890891 | Stuber et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7898277 | Weir | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7923240 | Su | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927797 | Nobile et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7932034 | Esfandyarpour et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7948015 | Rothberg et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7960776 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7972828 | Ward et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7981362 | Glezer et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8012690 | Berka et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8017938 | Gomez et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8035175 | Shim et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8052863 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067731 | Matyjaszczyk et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8114591 | Toumazou et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8124936 | Lagna | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8133698 | Silver et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8138496 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8199859 | Zerbe et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8217433 | Fife | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8231831 | Hartzell et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8232582 | Sauer et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8232813 | Burdett et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8247849 | Fife et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8262900 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8263336 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8264014 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8269261 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277628 | Ronaghi et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8293082 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306757 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313625 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313639 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8317999 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8343856 | Therrien et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8349167 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8361713 | Bridgham et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8383896 | Kamahori et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8426898 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8445194 | Drmanac et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8449824 | Sun | May 2013 | B2 |
8552771 | Jordan et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8558288 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8592154 | Rearick et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8673627 | Nobile et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20020012933 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020042388 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020150909 | Stuelpnagel et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168678 | Williams et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030054396 | Weiner | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030068629 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030108867 | Chee et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119020 | Stevens et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030124572 | Umek et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030124599 | Chen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141928 | Lee | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030155942 | Thewes et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030186262 | Cailloux et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211502 | Sauers et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215857 | Kilger et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224419 | Corcoran et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030231531 | Baxter et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040023253 | Kunwar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040079636 | Hsia et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106211 | Kauer et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136866 | Pontis et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040185484 | Costa et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197803 | Yaku et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050006234 | Hassibi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050009022 | Weiner et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050031490 | Gumbrecht et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050032075 | Yaku et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050058990 | Guia et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050067372 | Li et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050106587 | Klapproth | May 2005 | A1 |
20050142033 | Glezer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050156207 | Yazawa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050181440 | Chee et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050191698 | Chee et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202582 | Eversmann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050212016 | Brunner et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050221473 | Dubin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050230245 | Morgenshtein et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233318 | Chee et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239132 | Klapproth | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050282224 | Fouillet et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000772 | Sano et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024711 | Lapidus et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060057025 | Eversmann et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057604 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060073513 | Chee et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060141474 | Miyahara et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060166203 | Tooke et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060197118 | Migliorato et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060199193 | Koo et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060199493 | Hartmann, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060205061 | Roukes | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060219558 | Hafeman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060228721 | Leamon et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060246497 | Huang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269927 | Lieber | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070069291 | Stuber et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070087401 | Neilson et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092872 | Rothberg et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070095663 | Chou et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070212681 | Shapiro et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070231824 | Chee et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233477 | Halowani et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070262363 | Tao et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070278488 | Hirabayashi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080003142 | Link et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080014589 | Link et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080096216 | Quake et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080121946 | Youn et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080185616 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205559 | Iida | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080210931 | Truong et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080230386 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090026082 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048124 | Leamon et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062132 | Bortner | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090079414 | Levon et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090120905 | Kohl et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090127589 | Rothberg et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090156425 | Walt et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090170728 | Walt et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090194416 | Hsiung et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100007326 | Nakazato | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100137143 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100244106 | Parker et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100273166 | Garcia | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100300895 | Nobile et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100301398 | Rothberg et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110037121 | Lee et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110062972 | Minkyu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110114827 | Yamaoka et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110165557 | Ah et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110181253 | Isham et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110217697 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230375 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110236263 | Sawada et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110247933 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110263463 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110275522 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110281737 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110281741 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110287945 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299337 | Parris et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000274 | Fife | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001056 | Fife et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001235 | Fife | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001236 | Fife et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001237 | Fife et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120001646 | Bolander et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120013392 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022795 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120034607 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120037961 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120045368 | Hinz et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120045844 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120055811 | Rothberg et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120055813 | Rothberg et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120056248 | Fife et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120074956 | Fife et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120129703 | Rothberg et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120129732 | Rothberg et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120135870 | Rothberg et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143531 | Davey et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120161207 | Homyk et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120173159 | Davey et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120247977 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120261274 | Rearick et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265474 | Rearick et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120279859 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120280285 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120280286 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120283146 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286332 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286333 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286771 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120288853 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120288976 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120289413 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293158 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120295795 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120322054 | Rothberg et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120325683 | Milgrew | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120326213 | Bustillo et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120326767 | Milgrew | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329043 | Milgrew | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329044 | Milgrew | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329192 | Bustillo et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130001653 | Milgrew | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130004948 | Milgrew | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130004949 | Rearick et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130009214 | Bustillo et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130015505 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130015506 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130017959 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1582334 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1585896 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1826525 | Aug 2006 | CN |
102203282 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102008012899 | Sep 2009 | DE |
0223618 | May 1987 | EP |
1371974 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1432818 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1542009 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1557884 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1870703 | Dec 2007 | EP |
2307577 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2457851 | Sep 2009 | GB |
2461127 | Jul 2010 | GB |
58070155 | Apr 1983 | JP |
2002272463 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2005218310 | Aug 2004 | JP |
05077210 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005518541 | Jun 2005 | JP |
06138846 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2011525810 | Sep 2011 | JP |
100442838 | Jul 2004 | KR |
100455283 | Oct 2004 | KR |
WO-8909283 | Oct 1989 | WO |
WO-9813523 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO-9846797 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO-0120039 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-0181896 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-02077287 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-02086162 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-03073088 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-2004040291 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2004040291 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2004048962 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO2005015156 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO-2005047878 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2005043160 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2005054431 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2005602049 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO-2005084367 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005090961 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO-2006022370 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2006005967 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO2007002204 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2007086935 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO-2008007716 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2008058282 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2008076406 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO-2008107014 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO-2009012112 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2009041917 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO2009074926 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO2009081890 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009158006 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2010008480 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO-2010047804 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO-2010138182 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO-2012003359 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO-2012003363 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO-2012003368 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO-2012003380 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO-2012006222 | Jan 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dazhong, Z. et al. “Research of CMOS Biosensor IC for Extracellular Electrophysiological Signal Recording and pH value Measuring” Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology, 9th International Conference, Oct. 20, 2008, pp. 2557-2560. |
EP11801437.2 Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 25, 2013. |
EP11804218.3 Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 11, 2013. |
EP11804218.3 First Office Action dated Jul. 29, 2013. |
EP11827128.7 European Search Report dated Aug. 1, 2013. |
EP13161312.7 Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 15, 2013. |
EP13163995.7 Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 20, 2013. |
Eriksson, J. et al. “Pyrosequencing Technology at Elevated Temperature” Electrophoresis, vol. 25, 2004, pp. 20-27. |
Hanshaw, R. et al., “An indicator displacement system for fluorescent detection of phosphate oxyanions under physiological conditions” Science Direct, Tetrahedron Ltrs., vol. 45, 2004, pp. 8721-8724. |
Hizawa, et al. “Sensing Characteristics of Charge Transfer Type pH Sensor by Accumulative Operation” IEEE Sensors, EXCO, Daegu, Korea, 2006, pp. 144-147. |
JP20120246413 First Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2013. |
Lee, S. et al. “An Enhanced Glucose Biosensor Using Charge Transfer Techniques” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 24, 2008, pp. 650-656. |
Matsuo, J. et al. “Charge Transfer Type pH Sensor with Super High Sensitivity” 14th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors Actuators and Microsystems, France, Jun. 10-14, 2007, pp. 1881-1884. |
PCT/US2011/042683 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Mailed Jun. 4, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/022129 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 9, 2013. |
Premanode, B. et al. “Drift Reduction in Ion-Sensitive FETs Using Correlated Double Sampling”, Electronics Letters, IEEE Stevenage, GB, vol. 43 (16) Aug. 2, 2007. |
Rothberg, J. et al., “An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing” Nature, vol. 475, No. 7356, 2011, pp. 348-352. |
Sawada, K. et al., “Highly sensitive ion sensors using charge transfer technique”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 98, 2004, pp. 69-72. |
Seong-Jin, K. et al. “Label-Free CMOS DNA Quantification With On-Chip Noise Reduction Schemes” Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, IEEE, Jun. 10, 2013, pp. 947-950. |
Voigt, H. et al. “Diamond-like carbon-gate pH-ISFET” Sensors and Actuators B., vol. 44, 1997, pp. 441-445. |
[No Author Listed], “ISFET Wikipedia article”, Wikipedia, Last modified Nov. 7, 2006. |
Akiyama, T. et al., “Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistors with Inorganic Gate Oxide for pH Sensing”, IEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-29 (12), 1982, pp. 1936-1941. |
AU2011226767 Search Information Statement Mailed Oct. 26, 2011. |
Bandiera, L. et al., “A fully electronic sensor for the measurement of cDNA hybridization kinetics”, Biosens Bioelectron, vol. 22, 2007, pp. 2108-2114. |
Barbaro, M. et al., “A CMOS, Fully Integrated Sensor for Electronic Detection of DNA Hybridization”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 27(7), 2006, pp. 595-597. |
Barbaro, M. et al., “A Charge-Modulated FET for Detection of Biomolecular Processes: Conception, Modeling, and Simulation”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 53(1), 2006, pp. 158-166. |
Barbaro, M. et al., “Fully electronic DNA hybridization detection by a standard CMOS biochip”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 118, 2006, pp. 41-46. |
Bashford, G. et al., “Automated bead-trapping apparatus and control system for single-molecule DNA sequencing”, Optics Express, vol. 16(5), 2008, pp. 3445-3455. |
Baumann, W. et al., “Microelectronic sensor system for microphysiological application on living cells”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 55(1), 1999, pp. 77-89. |
Bausells, J. et al., “Ion-sensitive field-effect transistors fabricated in a commercial CMOS technology”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 57(1-3), 1999, pp. 56-62. |
Bergveld, P., “ISFET, Theory and Practice”, IEEE Sensor Conference, Toronto, Oct. 2003, pp. 1-26. |
Bergveld, P., “Thirty years of ISFETOLOGY What happened in the past 30 years and what may happen in the next 30 years”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 88(1), 2003, pp. 1-20. |
Besselink, G. et al., “ISFET Affinity Sensor”, Methods in Biotechnology, vol. 7: Affinity Biosensors: Techniques and Protocols, 1998, pp. 173-185. |
Bobrov, P. et al., “Chemical sensitivity of an ISFET with Ta2O5 membrane in strong acid and alkaline solutions”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 3, 1991, pp. 75-81. |
Bousse, L. et al., “A process for the combined fabrication of ion sensors and CMOS circuits”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 9(1), 1988, pp. 44-46. |
Bousse, L. et al., “Zeta potential measurements of Ta2O5 and SiO2 thin films”, J. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 147(1), 1991, pp. 22-32. |
Chan, Wai P. et al., “An Integrated ISFETs Instrumentation System in Standard CMOS Technology”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 45, No. 9, 2010, pp. 1923-1934. |
Chen, Y. et al., “Nanoscale field effect transistor for biomolecular signal amplification”, App Phys Letter, vol. 91(24), 2007, pp. 243511-1-243511-3. |
Chen, Y. et al., “Silicon-based nanoelectronic field-effect pH sensor with local gate control”, App Phys Letter, vol. 89, 2006, pp. 223512-1-223512-3. |
Chinese Patent Application 200780051353.2 Second Office Action Mailed Mar. 5, 2013. |
Chou, J. et al., “Letter to the Editor on Simulation of Ta2O5 gate ISFET temperature characteristics”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 80, 2001, pp. 290-291. |
Chou, J. et al., “Simulation of Ta2O5 gate ISFET temperature characteristics”, Sensor and Actuators B, vol. 71, Letter to the Editor, 2000, pp. 73-76. |
Chung, W-Y. et al., “ISFET interface circuit embedded with noise rejection capability”, Electronics Letters, vol. 40(18), e-pub, 2004, 1115-1116. |
Chung, W-Y. et al., “ISFET performance enhancement by using the improved circuit techniques”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 113, 2006, pp. 555-562. |
Chung, W-Y. et al., “New ISFET Interface Circuit Design with Temperature Compensation”, Microelectronics Journal, vol. 37(10), 2006, pp. 1105-1114. |
Chung, W-Y. et al., “Temperature Compensation Electronics for ISFET Readout Applications”, Biomedical Circuits and Systems, IEEE International Workshop Singapore, 2004, pp. 305-308. |
Eijkel, J. et al., “Measuring Donnan-related phenomena using a solid-state ion sensor and a concentration-step method”, J. Membrane Sci., vol. 127, 1997, pp. 203-221. |
Eijkel, J., “Potentiometric detection and characterization of adsorbed protein using stimulus-response measurement techniques”, Thesis, Sep. 3, 1955, pp. 1-147; 160-192. |
Eltoukhy, H. et al., “A 0.18um CMOS 10-6 lux Bioluminescence Detection System-on-Chip”, ISSCC 2004/Session12/Biomicrosystems/12.3, 2004, pp. 1-3. |
Eltoukhy, H. et al., “A. 0.18-um CMOS Bioluminescence Detection Lab-on-Chip”, IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, vol. 41(3), 2006, pp. 651-662. |
EP7867780.4 Examination Report Mailed Jul. 3, 2012. |
Esfandyarpour, H. et al., “Gate-controlled microfluidic chamber with magnetic bead for DNA sequencing-by-synthesis technology”, Proc 5th Intl Conf Nanochannels, Microchannels and Minichannels, Puebla, Mexico, Jun. 18-20, 2007, pp. 1-5. |
Eversmann, B. et al., “A 128×128 CMOS Biosensor Array for Extracellular Recording of Neural Activity”, IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., vol. 38(12), 2003, pp. 2306-2317. |
Faramarzpour, N. et al., “CMOS-Based Active Pixel for Low-Light Level Detection: Analysis and Measurements”, IEEE Trans Electron Devices, vol. 54(12), 2007, pp. 3229-3237. |
Finn, A. et al., “Towards an Optimization of FET-Based Bio-Sensors”, European Cells and Materials, vol. 4, Sup 2, 2002, pp. 21-23. |
Fraden, J., “Handbook of Modern Sensors-Physics, Designs, and Applications”, 17.3.2 CHEMFET Sensors, 1996, pp. 499-501. |
Fritz, J. et al., “Electronic detection of DNA by its intrinsic molecular charge”, PNAS, vol. 99(22), 2002, pp. 14142-14146. |
GB0811656.8 Search and Examination Report Mailed Mar. 12, 2010. |
GB0811656.8 Search Report Mailed Sep. 21, 2009. |
GB0811657.6 Examination Report Mailed Jun. 30, 2010. |
GB0811657.6 Search Report under Section 17 Mailed Oct. 26, 2009. |
Gracia, I. et al., “Test Structures for ISFET Chemical Sensors”, Proc IEEE 1992 Intl Conf Microelec Test Struct, 1992, pp. 156-159. |
Hammond, P. et al., “A System-on-Chip Digital pH Meter for Use in a Wireless Diagnostic Capsule”, IEEE Trans Biomedical Eng., vol. 52(4), 2005, pp. 687-694. |
Hammond, P. et al., “Design of a Single-Chip pH Sensor Using a Conventional 0.6-μm CMOS Process”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 4(6), 2004, pp. 706-712. |
Hammond, P. et al., “Encapsulation of a liquid-sensing microchip using SU-8 photoresist”, MicoElectronic Engineering, vol. 73-74, 2004, pp. 893-897. |
Hammond, S. et al., “Genomic sequencing and analysis of a Chinese Hamster ovary cell line using Illumina sequencing technology”, BMC Genomics, vol. 12:67, 2011, pp. 1-8. |
Han, Y., “Label-free detection of biomolecules by a field-effect transistor microarray biosensor with bio-functionalized gate surfaces”, Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 2006, pp. 1-63. |
Hara, H. et al., “Dynamic response of a Ta2O5-gate pH-sensitive field-effect transistor”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 32, 1996, pp. 115-119. |
Hermon, Z. et al., “Miniaturized bio-electronic hybrid for chemical sensing applications”, Tech Connect News, 2008, p. 1. |
Hideshima, S. et al., “Detection of tumor marker in blood serum using antibody-modified field effect transistor with optimized BSA blocking”, Sensors and Actuations B: Chemical, vol. 161, 2012, pp. 146-150. |
Hizawa, T. et al., “Fabrication of a two-dimensional pH image sensor using a charge transfer technique”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 117, 2006, pp. 509-515. |
Hizawa, T. et al., “32×32 pH Image Sensors for Real Time Observation of Biochemical Phenomena”, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, 2007, Transducers 2007. International, 2007, pp. 1311-1312. |
Jakobson, C. et al., “Low frequency noise and drift in Ion Sensitive Field Effect Transistors”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 68, 2000, pp. 134-139. |
Ji, H. et al., “A CMOS contact imager for locating individual cells”, ISCAS, 2006, pp. 3357-3360. |
Ji, H. et al., “Contact Imaging: Simulation and Experiment”, IEEE Trans Circuits Systems-I: Regular Papers, vol. 54(8), 2007, pp. 1698-1710. |
Kim, D. et al., “An FET-type charger sensor for highly sensitive detection of DNA sequence”, Biosens Bioelectron, vol. 20(1), 2004, pp. 69-74. |
Klein, M., “Time effects of ion-sensitive field-effect transistors”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 17(1-2), 1989, pp. 203-208. |
Koch, S. et al., “Protein detection with a novel ISFET-based zeta potential analyzer”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 14, 1999, pp. 413-421. |
Krause, M. et al., “Extended Gate Electrode Arrays for Extracellular Signal Recordings”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 70, 2000, pp. 101-107. |
Kruise, J. et al., “Detection of protein concentrations using a pH-step titration method”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 44, 1997, pp. 297-303. |
Leamon, J. et al., “A Massively Parallel PicoTiterPlate Based Platform for Discrete Picoliter-Scale Polymerase Chain Reactions”, Electrophoresis, vol. 24, 2003, pp. 3769-3777. |
Leamon, J. et al., “Cramming More Sequencing Reactions onto Microreactor Chips”, Chemical Reviews, vol. 107, 2007, pp. 3367-3376. |
Lee, C-S. et al., “Ion-sensitive Field-Effect Transistor for Biological Sensing”, Sensors, vol. 9, 2009, pp. 7111-7131. |
Lohrengel, M. et al., “A new microcell or microreactor for material surface investigations at large current densities”, Electrochimica Acta, vol. 49, 2004, pp. 2863-2870. |
Lui, A. et al., “A Test Chip for ISFET/CMNOS Technology Development”, Proc. of the 1996 IEEE Intl. Conf. on Microelectronic Test Structures, vol. 9, 1996, pp. 123-128. |
Margulies, M. et al., “Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors”, Nature, vol. 437(7057), 2005, pp. 376-380. |
Marshall, A. et al., “DNA chips: an array of possibilities”, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 16, 1998, pp. 27-31. |
Martinoia, S. et al., “A behavioral macromodel of the ISFET in SPICE”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 62, 2000, pp. 182-189. |
Martinoia, S. et al., “Development of ISFET Array-Based Microsystems for Bioelectrochemical measurements of cell populations”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 16, 2001, pp. 1043-1050. |
Medoro, G. et al., “A Lab-on-a-Chip for Cell Detection and Manipulation”, IEEE Sensors J, vol. 3(3), 2003, pp. 317-325. |
Meyburg, S. et al., “N-Channel field-effect transistors with floating gates for extracellular recordings”, Biosens Bioelectron, vol. 21(7), 2006, pp. 1037-1044. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “A 16×16 CMOS proton camera array for direct extracellular imaging of hydrogen-ion activity”, IEEE Intl Solid-State Circuits Conf, Session 32:24, 2008, pp. 590-638. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “A large transistor based sensor array chip for direct extracellular imaging”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 111-112, 2005, pp. 347-353. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “Matching the transconductance characteristics of CMOS ESFET arrays by removing trapped charge”, IEEE Trans Electron Devices, vol. 55(4), 2008, pp. 1074-1079. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “Microsensor Array Technology for Direct Extracellular Imaging”, Dept Electronic and EE, University of Glasgow, 2006, pp. 1-23. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “The development of scalable sensor arrays using standard CMOS technology”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 103, 2004, pp. 37-42. |
Milgrew, M. et al., “The fabrication of scalable multi-sensor arrays using standard CMOS technology”, 2003 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2003, pp. 513-516. |
Miyahara, Y. et al., “Biochip Using Micromachining Technology”, J. Institute of Electrostatics, Japan, vol. 27(6), (Translation Included), 2003, pp. 268-272. |
Miyahara, Y. et al., “Direct Transduction of Primer Extension into Electrical Signal Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, Micro Total Analysis Systems 2004, vol. 1, 2004, pp. 303-305. |
Miyahara, Y. et al., “Potentiometric Detection of DNA Molecules Using Field Effect Transistor”, The Japan Society of Applied Physics, No. 3 (Translation included), 2003, pp. 1180. |
Nyren, P. et al., “Enzymatic Method for Continuous Monitoring of Inorganic Pyrophosphate Synthesis”, Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 151, 1985, pp. 504-509. |
Oelbner, W. et al., “Encapsulation of ESFET sensor chips”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 105, 2005, pp. 104-117. |
Oelbner, W. et al., “Investigation of the dynamic response behaviour of ISFET pH sensors by means of laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV)”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 26-27, 1995, pp. 345-348. |
Offenhausser, A. et al., “Field-Effect transistor array for monitoring electrical activity from mammalian neurons in culture”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 12(8), 1997, pp. 819-826. |
Ohno, Y. et al., “Electrolyte-Gated Graphene Field-Effect Transistors for Detecting pH and Protein Adsorption”, Nano Letters, vol. 9(9), Jul. 28, 2009, pp. 3318-3322. |
Park, K-Y. et al., “ISFET Glucose Sensor System With Fast Recovery Characteristics by Employing Electrolysis”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 83 (1-3), 2002, pp. 90-97. |
Patolsky, F. et al., “Nanowire-Based Biosensors”, Analyt Chem 1, vol. 78(13), 2006, pp. 4261-4269. |
PCT/US2009/05745 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Mailed Apr. 26, 2011. |
PCT/US2009/05745 International Search Report Mailed Dec. 11, 2009. |
PCT/US2009/05745 Written Opinion Mailed Dec. 11, 2009. |
PCT/US2007/025721 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Mailed Jun. 16, 2009. |
PCT/US2007/025721 Written Opinion Mailed Jun. 16, 2009. |
PCT/US2009/003766 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Mailed Jan. 5, 2011. |
PCT/US2009/003766 International Search Report Mailed Apr. 8, 2010. |
PCT/US2009/003766 Written Opinion Mailed Apr. 8, 2010. |
PCT/US2009/003797 International Search Report Mailed Mar. 12, 2010. |
PCT/US2009/003797 Written Opinion Mailed Mar. 12, 2010. |
PCT/US2010/001543 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Mailed Nov. 29, 2011. |
PCT/US2010/001543 International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed Oct. 13, 2010. |
PCT/US2010/048835 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Mailed Mar. 19, 2013. |
PCT/US2010/048835 International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed Dec. 16, 2010. |
PCT/US2011/042655 International Search Report Mailed Oct. 21, 2011. |
PCT/US2011/042660 International Search Report Mailed Nov. 2, 2011. |
PCT/US2011/042665 International Search Report Mailed Nov. 2, 2011. |
PCT/US2011/042668 International Preliminary Report on Patentability Mailed Mar. 26, 2013. |
PCT/US2011/042668 International Search Report Mailed Oct. 28, 2011. |
PCT/US2011/042669 International Search Report Mailed Jan. 9, 2012. |
PCT/US2011/042669 Written Opinion Mailed Jan. 9, 2012. |
PCT/US2011/042683 International Search Report Mailed Feb. 16, 2012. |
PCT/US2011/042683 Written Opinion Mailed Feb. 16, 2012. |
PCT/US2012/058996 International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed Jan. 22, 2013. |
PCT/US2012/071471 International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed Apr. 24, 2013. |
PCT/US2012/071482 International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed May 23, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/022140 International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed May 2, 2013. |
Poghossian, A. et al., “Functional testing and characterization of ISFETs on wafer level by means of a micro-droplet cell”, Sensors, vol. 6, 2006, pp. 397-404. |
Pollack, J. et al., “Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA Microarrays”, Nature Genetics, vol. 23, 1999, pp. 41-46. |
Pourmand, N. et al., “Direct electrical detection of DNA synthesis”, PNAS, vol. 103(17), 2006, pp. 6466-6470. |
Pouthas, F. et al., “Spatially resolved electronic detection of biopolymers”, Phys Rev, vol. 70, 2004, pp. 031906-1-031906-8. |
Premanode, B. et al., “A composite ISFED readout circuit employing current feedback”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 127, 2007, pp. 486-490. |
Premanode, B. et al., “A novel, low power biosensor for real time monitoring of creatine and urea in peritoneal dialysis”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 120, 2007, pp. 732-735. |
Premanode, B. et al., “Ultra-low power precision ISFET readout using global current feedback”, Electronic Lett, vol. 42(22), 2006, pp. 1264-1265. |
Purushothaman, S. et al., “Protons and single nucleotide polymorphism detection: A simple use for the Ion Sensitive Field Effect Transistor”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 114(2), 2006, pp. 964-968. |
Purushothaman, S. et al., “Towards Fast Solid State DNA Sequencing”, IEEE ISCAS 2002 Proceedings, Circuits and Systems, vol. 4, 2002, pp. IV-169-IV-172. |
Rodriguez-Villegas, E., “Solution to trapped charge in FGMOS transistors”, Electronics Letters, vol. 39(19), 2003. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Cell-based field effect devices for cell adhesion analysis”, Intl. Conf. of Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology, May 9-12, 2006, Okinawa, Japan, pp. 177-179. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Detection of DNA recognition events using multi-well field effect transistor”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics vol. 21, 2005, pp. 827-832. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Detection sensitivity of genetic field effect transistor combined with charged nanoparticle-DNA conjugate”, Proc. of 2006 Intl. Conf. on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology, May 9-12, 2006, Okinawa, Japan, pp. 97-100. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Direct detection of single nucleotide polymorphism using genetic field effect transistor”, Digest of Papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology 2004, Osaka, Japan, 2004 International Microprocesses and Nanotechnology Conference, 2004, pp. 226-227. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Direct Detection of Single-Base Extension Reaction Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, Proc. of 3rd Ann. Intl. IEEE EMBS Special Topic Conf. on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology, Kahuku, Oahu, HI, May 12-15, 2005, pp. 219-222. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Direct transduction of allele-specific primer extension into electrical signal using genetic field effect transistor”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 22, 2007, pp. 1311-1316. |
Sakata, T. et al., “DNA Analysis Chip Based on Field-Effect Transistors”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44(4B), 2005, pp. 2854-2859. |
Sakata, T. et al., “DNA Sequencing Based on Intrinsic Molecular Charges”, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2006, vol. 118, 2006, pp. 2283-2286. |
Sakata, T. et al., “DNA Sequencing Based on Intrinsic Molecular Charges”, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2006, vol. 45, 2006, pp. 2225-2228. |
Sakata, T. et al., “DNA Sequencing Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, vol. 2, 2005, pp. 1676-1679. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Immobilization of oligonucleotide probes on Si3N4 surface and its application to genetic field effect transistor”, Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 24, 2004, pp. 827-832. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potential Behavior of Biochemically Modified Gold Electrode for Extended-Gate Field-Effect Transistor”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44(4B), 2005, pp. 2860-2863. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potential Response of Genetic Field Effect Transistor to Charged Nanoparticle-DNA Conjugate”, Digest of Papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology 2005, Tokyo, Japan, 2005 Intl Microprocesses and Nanotech Conf., Hotel Bellclassic, 2005, pp. 42-43. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potentiometric Detection of Allele Specific Oligonucleotide Hybridization Using Genetic Field Effect Transistor”, Micro Total Analysis Systems, 8th Intl. Conf. on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences, 2004, pp. 300-302. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potentiometric detection of DNA molecules hybridization using gene field effect transistor and intercalator” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 782, 2004, pp. 393-400. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potentiometric Detection of DNA Using Genetic Transistor”, Denki Gakkai Kenkyukai Shiryo Chemical Sensor Kenkyukai, CHS-03-51-55, 2003, pp. 1-5. |
Sakata, T. et al., “Potentiometric Detection of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism by Using a Genetic Field-effect transistor”, ChemBioChem, vol. 6, 2005, pp. 703-710. |
Sakurai, T. et al., “Real-Time Monitoring of DNA Polymerase Reactions by a Micro ISFET pH Sensor”, Anal Chem, vol. 64(17), 1992, pp. 1996-1997. |
Salama, K., “CMOS luminescence detection lab-on-chip: modeling, design, and characterization”, Thesis, Presented at Stanford University, 2005, pp. ii-78. |
Salama, K., “Modeling and simulation of luminescence detection platforms”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 2004, pp. 1377-1386. |
Sawada, K. et al., “A novel fused sensor for photo- and ion-sensing”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 106, 2005, pp. 614-618. |
Schasfoort, R. et al., “A new approach to immunoFET operation”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 5, 1990, pp. 103-124. |
Schasfoort, R. et al., “Field-effect flow control for microfabricated fluidic networks”, Science, vol. 286(5441), 1999, pp. 942-945. |
Schoning, M. et al., “Bio FEDs (Field-Effect Devices): State-of-the-Art and New Directions”, Electroanalysis, vol. 18(19-20), 2006, pp. 1893-1900. |
SG200903992-6 Search and Examination Report Mailed Jan. 20, 2011. |
Shah, N., “Microfabrication of a parellel-array DNA pyrosequencing chip”, NNIN REU Research Accomplishments, 2005, pp. 130-131. |
Shepherd, L. et al., “A biochemical translinear principle with weak inversion ISFETs”, IEEE Trans Circuits Syst-I, vol. 52(12), 2005, pp. 2614-2619. |
Shepherd, L. et al., “A novel voltage-clamped CMOS ISFET sensor interface”, IEEE, 2007, pp. 3331-3334. |
Shepherd, L. et al., “Towards direct biochemical analysis with weak inversion ISFETS”, Intl Workshop on Biomedical, 2004, S1.5-5-S1.5-8. |
Shepherd, L. et al., “Weak inversion ISFETs for ultra-low power biochemical sensing and real-time analysis”, Sensors Actuators B, vol. 107, 2005, pp. 468-473. |
Shi, Y. et al., “Radical Capillary Array Electrophoresis Microplace and Scanner for High-Performance Nucleic Acid Analysis”, Anal. Chem., vol. 71(23), 1999, pp. 5354-5361. |
Simonian, A. L. et al., “FET based biosensors for the direct detection of organophosphate neurotoxins”, Electroanalysis, vol. 16(22), 2004, pp. 1896-1906. |
Souteyrand, E. et al., “Direct detection of the hybridization of synthetic homo-oligomer DNA sequences by field effect”, J Phys Chem B, vol. 101(15), 1997, pp. 2980-2985. |
Starodub, N. et al., “Immunosensor for the determination of the herbicide simazine based on an ion-selective field-effect transistor”, Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 424, 2000, pp. 37-43. |
Takenaka, S. et al., “DNA Sensing on a DNA Probe-Modified Electrode Using Ferrocenylnaphthalene Dimide as the Electrochemically Active Ligand”, Anal. Chem., vol. 72(6), 2000, pp. 1334-1341. |
Tomaszewski, D. et al., “Electrical characterization of ISFETs”, J Telecomm Info Technol, 2007, pp. 55-60. |
Toumazou, C. et al., “Using transistors to linearase biochemistry”, Elect Let, vol. 43(2), 2007, p. 3. |
Truman, P. et al. “Monitoring liquid transport and chemical composition in lab on a chip systems using ion sensitive FET devices”, Lab on a Chip, vol. 6, 2006, pp. 1220-1228. |
Uslu, F. et al., “Labelfree fully electronic nucleic acid detection system based on a field-effect transistor device”, Biosens & Bioelectron, vol. 19(12), 2004, pp. 1723-1731. |
Van Der Wouden, E. et al., “Directional flow induced by synchronized longitudinal and zeta-potential controlling AC-electrical fields”, Lab Chip, vol. 6(10), 2006, pp. 1300-1305. |
Van Hal, R.E.G. et al., “A general model to describe the electrostatic potential at electrolyte oxide interfaces”, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 69, 1996, pp. 31-62. |
Van Kerkhof, J. et al., “ISFET Responses on a stepwise change in electrolyte concentration at constant pH”, Sensors Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 18-19, 1994, pp. 56-59. |
Van Kerkhof, J. et al., “The ISFET based heparin sensor with a monolayer of protamine as affinity ligand”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 10(3), 1995, pp. 269-282. |
Van Kerkhof, J., “Development of an ISFET based heparin sensor using the ion-step measuring method”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 8 (9-10). pp. 463-472. |
Wagner, T. et al., “All-in-one” solid-state device based on a light-addressable potentiometric sensor platform, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 117, 2006, pp. 472-479. |
Wang, W. et al., “Label-free detection of small-molecule-protein interactions by using nanowire nanosensors”, Proc. of the Natl. Acad.of Sciences (PNAS), vol. 102(9), 2005, pp. 3208-3212. |
Woias, P. et al., “Slow pH response effects of silicon nitride ISFET sensors”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 48, 1998, pp. 501-504. |
Woias, P., “Modeling the short time response of ISFET sensors”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 24-25, 1995, pp. 211-217. |
Wu, P. et al., “DNA and protein microarray printing on silicon nitride waveguide surfaces”, Biosensens Bioelectron, vol. 21(7), 2006, pp. 1252-1263. |
Xu, J. et al., “Analytical Aspects of FET-Based Biosensors”, Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 10, 2005, pp. 420-430. |
Yeow, T.C.W. et al., “A very large integrated pH-ISFET sensor array chip compatible with standard CMOS processes”, Sensor and Actuators B, vol. 44, 1997, pp. 434-440. |
Yuqing, M. et al., “Ion sensitive field effect transducer-based biosensors”, Biotechnology Advances, vol. 21, 2003, pp. 527-534. |
Zhang, X. et al., “32-Channel Full Customized CMOS Biosensor Chip for Extracellular neural Signal Recording”, Proc. of the 2nd Intl. IEEE EMBs Conf. on Neural Engineering, Arlington, Virginia, 2005, pp. v-viii. |
Zhou, G. et al., “Quantitative detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms for a pooled sample by a bioluminometric assay coupled with modified primer extension reactions (BAMPER)”, Nuc. Acids Res., vol. 29(19), e93, 2001, pp. 1-11. |
Bockelmann, U. et al., “Detecting DNA by field effect transistor arrays”, Proceedings of the 2006 IFIP International Conference on Very Large Scale Integration, 2006, 164-168. |
EP11801439.8 EP Extended Search Report dated Mar. 7, 2014. |
Tokuda, T. et al., “A CMOS image sensor with optical and potential dual imaging function for on-chip bioscientific applications”, Sensors and Actuators A, vol. 125, No. 2, 2006, 273-280. |
Bousse, L. et al. “A process for the combined fabrication of ion sensors and CMOS circuits” IEEE Electron Device Ltrs, 1988, pp. 44-46. |
EP13174555.6 EP Extended Search Report Dec. 12, 2013. |
EP13174555.6 EP Search Report Nov. 21, 2013. |
EP13177039.8 EP Search Report Nov. 21, 2013. |
EP13177590.0 EP Search Report Nov. 20, 2013. |
Hammond, et al., “Performance and System-On-Chip Integration of an Unmodified CMOS ISFET”, Science Direct, Sensors and Actuators vol. 111-112, 2005, pp. 254-258. |
Ingebrandt, Sven et al. “Label-free Detection of DNA using Field-Effect Transistors”, Phys. stat. sol. (a) 203, No. 14, 2006, pp. 3399-3411. |
Wood, et al. “Base composition-independent hybridization in tetramethylammonium chloride: a method for oligonucleotide screening of highly complex gene libraries” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 1985, pp. 1585-1588. |
EP14152861.2 EP Search Report date Jul. 7, 2014. |
Palan, B. et al., “New ISFET sensor interface circuit for biomedical applications”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical: International Journal Devoted to Research and Development of Physical and Chemical Transducers, Elsevier S.A. Ch., vol. 57, No. 1-3, 1999, pp. 63-68. |
PCT/US2013/022129 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 22, 2014. |
PCT/US2013/022140 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 22, 2014. |
Zhao, B. et al., “Floating-Gate Ion Sensitive Field-Effect Transistor for Chemical and Biological Sensing”, MRS Proceedings, vol. 828, 2004, pp. 349-354. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140209982 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |