The disclosure deals with a self-aligning roller bearing, in particular with the rolling behavior of the rollers on the raceways of such a self-aligning roller bearing.
Self-aligning roller bearings generally have an inner bearing ring, an outer bearing ring arranged coaxially with the inner bearing ring and rollers arranged in at least one roller row, wherein the rollers of the at least one roller row have a curved lateral surface extending in the direction of the rotation axis of these rollers and has a radius R1, wherein the rollers of this at least one roller row roll over curved raceways provided by different bearing rings, wherein each of these raceways is assigned a groove point P1; P2 around which the curved raceway of the relevant bearing ring extends at a radial distance R2; R3 in the direction of the rotation axis DA2 of the bearing, wherein a pressure line DL intersects the rotation axis DA1 of the rollers of the at least one roller row at a right angle at a point, wherein these rollers have their largest roller diameter, and wherein R1 is smaller than both radii R2, R3.
A self-aligning roller bearing of this type is known from DE 10 2008 037 990 A1.
If such a self-aligning roller bearing is put into operation, the rollers adjust themselves between the raceways of the bearing rings in such a way that the contact area between roller and raceway is in the area of the largest roller diameter, i.e. the so-called pressure ellipse develops there. Since the shape of the outer ring raceway in the direction of the rotation axis of the bearing—viewed geometrically—describes part of a hollow sphere on which the roller or rollers can adjust freely, the contact with the inner ring consequently determines how the rollers adjust themselves in the bearing, wherein the resulting contact angle of the inner ring to the roller corresponds structurally to the pressure angle of the bearing.
In general, it can be said that on the inner ring of self-aligning roller bearings, the highest sliding speeds tend to occur in the edge area of the rolling contact. Depending on the pressure angle and/or the difference between the raceway radii of the inner and outer bearing ring, these higher sliding velocities can occur in the axially inner or axially outer edge areas of the rolling contact and lead to friction losses there, which means that the rollers set and/or cause higher material stresses.
In order to counteract this problem, DE 2 334 394 A1 proposes providing the raceways of the inner and/or outer bearing ring with a non-constant radius. Apart from the fact that running contours that have a small, constant radius can only be manufactured with great effort, such raceway contours offered by the applicant impair the axial positioning of the rollers in the load zone of the bearing and result in undesirable lateral sliding of the rollers.
Therefore, the object is to provide a self-aligning roller bearing in which contact areas where the highest sliding speeds otherwise occur are relieved in a simple manner.
This object is achieved by a self-aligning roller bearing having one or more of the features specified herein. Advantageous embodiments and further developments are listed below and in the claims.
If the raceway for the rollers of at least one roller row at one of the bearing rings has its associated groove point P1 on the pressure line DL, which gives the raceway radius R2, the raceway for the rollers of at least one roller row on the other bearing ring has its associated groove point P2, which gives the raceway radius R3 on a line L, and if the pressure line DL and the line L have a common intersection point SP1, the radial distance A1 of which from the groove point P2 is smaller than the radial distance A2 from the groove point P1, the raceways on the two bearing rings are arranged tilted relative to one another around the intersection point SP1.
The bearing ring whose raceways are tilted relative to the raceways of the other bearing ring should preferably be the inner bearing ring, because this does not change the manufacturing effort for the outer bearing ring and it is insignificant for production whether the raceways on the inner bearing ring are formed on the groove point P2 lying on the printing line DL or another groove point P2 is formed lying around the line L.
If the manufacturing advantage of the outer bearing ring is dispensed with, which results from a uniform inner contour between the ends of this bearing ring with only one radius, the inner contour of the outer bearing ring can also have two sections, each describing a radius, which merge into one another in the middle of the outer bearing ring.
In
Each roller 4 has two end surfaces 5, which maintain a mutual distance along the rotation axis DA1 of the rollers 4, which corresponds to the width B of the roller. The lateral surface 6 of the rollers 4 is curved, wherein the curvature of each lateral surface 6 of each roller 4 describes a radius R1.
As can be seen from the representation according to
Each of the two bearing rings 2, 3 is provided with at least one raceway 8.n. A raceway 8.n in the sense of this application is understood to mean an annular surface which lies on the radially outer contour 9, 1, 9, 2 in the case of an inner bearing ring 2 and on its radially inner contour 9,1, 9,2 in the case of an outer bearing ring 3, has an extension in each case in the direction of the rotation axis DA2 of the bearing and over which the rollers 4 provided between the two bearing rings 2, 3 roll when the bearing is mounted.
Since the bearing shown in
Just like the curved lateral surfaces 6 of the rollers 4 arranged between the two bearing rings 2, 3, each of the raceways 8.n is also curved. The common raceway 8.3, 8.4, which extends fully along the inner contour 9.2 of the outer bearing ring 3 between its axial ends 12, has a uniform curvature with a radius R2, which is slightly larger than the radius R1 of the respective lateral surfaces 6 of the rollers 4. Consequently, the common raceway 8.3, 8.4 provides a concave cavity in relation to the longitudinal extension of the rollers 4. The inner bearing ring 2 is similar. Due to the X arrangement of the rollers 4 between the bearing rings 2, 3, however, there are two raceways 8.1, 8.2, which are axially separated from one another by an elevation 10, of which each of these raceways 8.1, 8.2 has a uniform curvature with a radius R3, which is also slightly larger than the radius R1 of the respective lateral surfaces 6 of the rollers 4. Consequently, each of the two separate raceways 8.1, 8.2 on the inner bearing ring 2 also provides a concave cavity in relation to the longitudinal extension of the rollers 4. Even if the radii R2, R3 shown in the representation according to
If a double-row self-aligning roller bearing 1 is mounted, the lateral surfaces 6 of the rollers 4 and the respective raceways 8.n form contact points 13.n. In the case of a conventionally designed self-aligning roller bearing 1 as shown in
In connection with this application, self-aligning roller bearings 1, the contact angles α of which are the same for both roller rows 7.1, 7.2, are generally referred to as symmetrical self-aligning roller bearings 1. However, double-row self-aligning roller bearings are also known for improved dissipation of axial loads, in which the contact angles α of the two roller rows 7.1, 7.2 are of different sizes. Such bearings are referred to as asymmetric self-aligning roller bearings.
Structurally, this means that at least in the case of symmetrical self-aligning roller bearings 1 of the type shown in
If, however, symmetrical self-aligning roller bearings 1 are formed as shown in
In order to reduce or completely rule out setting of the rollers 4 during operation, only the structural conditions for one of the two bearing rings 2, 3 are changed, based on an arrangement corresponding to the prior art. Such an embodiment described and is shown in
Here, the outer bearing ring 3 forms the unchanged bearing ring according to the explanations in the last paragraph, because there too, the groove point P1 for the radius R2 of the common raceway 8.3, 8.4 is also on the pressure line DL, specifically where this intersects the rotation axis DA2 of the bearing. Consequently, the points of contact 13.1 of the rollers 4 of the two roller rows 7.1, 7.2 with the common raceway 8.3, 8.4 are also located where the rollers 4 have their largest roller diameter D1.
Deviating from this are the groove points P2 of the radii R3 of the raceways 8.1, 8.2 of the inner bearing ring 2 on a line L, which in each case includes an angle β to the vertical S and which forms an intersection SP with the pressure line DL.
This angle β is a function of the pressure angle α and the corresponding radii R2, R3 of the raceways 8.1, 8.2 or 8.2, 8.4 involved. Since in the embodiment shown in
β=arcsin(R2/R3*sin(α)),
that the angle β is smaller than the pressure angle α.
Due to the difference between the two angles α, β and the fact that, in relation to the rotation axis DA2 of the bearing, the groove points P2 of the raceways 8.1, 8.2 on the inner bearing ring 2 maintain a greater radial distance on the outer bearing ring 3 compared to the groove point P3 of the common raceway 8.3. 8.4, the radial distance A1 of the intersection point SP from the respective groove point P2 is smaller than the radial distance A2 of the intersection point SP from the groove point P1.
This angular offset between the groove points P2, P3 of the respective raceways 8.n does not result in the contact points 13.2 between the rollers 4 and the respective raceways 8.1, 8.2 changing, i.e. shifting along the raceways 8.1, 8.2. Rather, despite the position of the groove points P2 for the raceways 8.1, 8.2 on the line L running at the angle β, the contact points 13.2 between the rollers 4 and the raceways 8.1, 8.2 of the inner bearing ring 2 are basically where the rollers 4 have their largest diameter D1. However, due to the tilting of the raceways 8.1, 8.2 of the inner bearing ring 2 due to their groove points P2 on the lines L, the contact conditions between the rollers 4 and the respective raceways 8.1, 8.2 change, with the result that the pressure ellipses, which generally change under load to form the respective contact points 13.2, expand a little more axially outwards. This axial extension is indicated by reference number 14 for the roller row 7.1. This tilting of the raceways 8.1, 8.2 has the further consequence that, in relation to the respective contact points 13,2, the sections of the raceways 8.1, 8.2 that adjoin it axially inwards in
β=arcsin(R2/R3*sin(α)),
the angle β, under which the line L runs, is larger than the pressure angle α. Because the angle β is larger than the pressure angle α, the resulting pressure ellipses expand axially inwards when the bearing is loaded, starting from the contact points 13.2. This turning area axially inwards is indicated in
Both in the exemplary embodiment according to
A formula that takes into account the roughness factors f1, f2 of the different raceways 8.1, 8.2; 8.3, 8.4 when designing the angle β can be taken from the following relationship:
β=arcsin(f1/f2*R2/R3*sin(α)),
Where here, too, R2 is the radius of the common raceway 8.3, 8.4 in the outer bearing ring 3, R3 is the radii of the raceways 8.1, 8.2 in the inner bearing ring 2, f1 is the roughness factor on the—common— raceway 8.3, 8.4 of the outer bearing ring 3 and f.2 is the roughness factor on the raceways 8.1, 8.2 of the inner bearing ring 2.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2020 119 948.1 | Jul 2020 | DE | national |
This application is the U.S. National Phase of PCT Appln. No. PCT/DE2021/100623, filed Jul. 16, 2021, which claims the benefit of German Patent Appln. No. 102020119948.1, filed Jul. 29, 2020, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2021/100623 | 7/16/2021 | WO |