This disclosure relates to rotating equipment, for example, rotating equipment used in wellbores.
Artificial lift can be employed in wells to boost production of fluid to the Earth's surface. Electric submersible pumps (ESPs) are commonly used to provide artificial lift. As components of an ESP rotate, axial loads are generated. In some cases, ESPs include a protector that can support the thrust loads of the ESP. The protector can also provide other various functions, such as protecting a motor from well fluid, pressure equalization between the motor and the wellbore, and transmitting power from the motor to the ESP.
Certain aspects of the subject matter described can be implemented as a thrust balancing apparatus for a pump. The apparatus includes a housing, a balancing chamber, a connecting tube, a balancing disk, a bushing, a washer, and a pair of upthrust washers. The balancing chamber is coupled to and disposed within the housing. The balancing chamber defines an upper cavity and a lower cavity. The connecting tube is coupled to the balancing chamber and the housing. The connecting tube is configured to establish fluid communication between the balancing chamber and an exterior of the housing, such that an interior of the balancing chamber is exposed to fluid surrounding the housing. The balancing disk is coupled to and surrounds a rotatable shaft of the pump. The rotatable shaft passes through the balancing chamber. A first portion of the balancing disk is disposed within the upper cavity of the balancing chamber. A second portion of the balancing disk passes through the lower cavity of the balancing chamber. A third portion of the balancing disk is external to the balancing chamber. The bushing is disposed within the housing and surrounds the rotatable shaft. The washer surrounds the rotatable shaft. The washer is disposed within the housing between the third portion of the balancing disk and the bushing. The pair of upthrust washers surrounds the third portion of the balancing disk. The pair of upthrust washers is disposed within the housing between the third portion of the balancing disk and the balancing chamber.
This, and other aspects, can include one or more of the following features.
In some implementations, the pump is an electric submersible pump that operates free of a protector. In some implementations, the housing is positioned downstream of a pump stage of the electric submersible pump.
In some implementations, the first portion of the balancing disk includes a first disk. In some implementations, the second portion of the balancing disk is tubular. In some implementations, the third portion of the balancing disk includes a second disk.
In some implementations, the washer is axially disposed between the bushing and the second disk of the third portion of the balancing disk. In some implementations, the pair of upthrust washers is axially disposed between the balancing chamber and the second disk of the third portion of the balancing disk.
In some implementations, the connecting tube is coupled to the upper cavity of the balancing chamber.
In some implementations, the upper cavity and the lower cavity of the balancing chamber are partitioned by a ring lining an inner circumferential wall of the balancing chamber. In some implementations, the second portion of the balancing disk passes through the ring.
In some implementations, a first spacing is defined between the ring and the first disk of the first portion of the balancing disk. In some implementations, a second spacing is defined between the pair of upthrust washers. In some implementations, the first spacing and the second spacing are adjustable to balance a thrust load of the rotatable shaft.
In some implementations, the apparatus includes a seal surrounding the rotatable shaft. In some implementations, the seal is radially disposed between the rotatable shaft and the balancing chamber. In some implementations, the seal is configured to prevent fluid flow between the upper cavity of the balancing chamber and an interior of the housing.
Certain aspects of the subject matter described can be implemented as a system. The system includes an electric submersible pump (ESP) and a thrust balancing apparatus. The ESP is independent of a protector. The ESP includes multiple pump stages and a rotatable shaft. The thrust balancing apparatus is located downstream of the pump stages of the ESP. The thrust balancing apparatus includes a housing, a balancing chamber, a connecting tube, a balancing disk, a bushing, a washer, and a pair of upthrust washers. The balancing chamber is coupled to and disposed within the housing. The balancing chamber defines an upper cavity and a lower cavity. The connecting tube is coupled to the balancing chamber and the housing. The connecting tube is configured to establish fluid communication between the balancing chamber and an exterior of the housing, such that an interior of the balancing chamber is exposed to fluid surrounding the housing. The balancing disk is coupled to and surrounds the rotatable shaft. The rotatable shaft passes through the balancing chamber. A first portion of the balancing disk is disposed within the upper cavity of the balancing chamber. A second portion of the balancing disk passes through the lower cavity of the balancing chamber. A third portion of the balancing disk is external to the balancing chamber. The bushing is disposed within the housing and surrounds the rotatable shaft. The washer surrounds the rotatable shaft. The washer is disposed within the housing between the third portion of the balancing disk and the bushing. The pair of upthrust washers surrounds the third portion of the balancing disk. The pair of upthrust washers is disposed within the housing between the third portion of the balancing disk and the balancing chamber.
This, and other aspects, can include one or more of the following features.
In some implementations, the first portion of the balancing disk includes a first disk. In some implementations, the second portion of the balancing disk is tubular. In some implementations, the third portion of the balancing disk includes a second disk.
In some implementations, the washer is axially disposed between the bushing and the second disk of the third portion of the balancing disk. In some implementations, the pair of upthrust washers is axially disposed between the balancing chamber and the second disk of the third portion of the balancing disk.
In some implementations, the connecting tube is coupled to the upper cavity of the balancing chamber.
In some implementations, the upper cavity and the lower cavity of the balancing chamber are partitioned by a ring lining an inner circumferential wall of the balancing chamber. In some implementations, the second portion of the balancing disk passes through the ring.
In some implementations, a first spacing is defined between the ring and the first disk of the first portion of the balancing disk. In some implementations, a second spacing is defined between the pair of upthrust washers. In some implementations, the first spacing and the second spacing are adjustable to balance a thrust load of the rotatable shaft.
In some implementations, the thrust balancing apparatus includes a seal surrounding the rotatable shaft. In some implementations, the seal is radially disposed between the rotatable shaft and the balancing chamber. In some implementations, the seal is configured to prevent fluid flow between the upper cavity of the balancing chamber and an interior of the housing.
Certain aspects of the subject matter described can be implemented as a method. Fluid communication between a balancing chamber and an exterior of a housing is established by a connecting tube coupled to the balancing chamber and the housing, thereby exposing an interior of the balancing chamber to fluid surrounding the housing. The balancing chamber is coupled to and disposed within the housing. The balancing chamber defines an upper cavity and a lower cavity. Pressure within the balancing chamber is balanced by adjusting a first spacing. A balancing disk is coupled to and surrounds a rotatable shaft passing through the balancing chamber. A ring lining an inner circumferential wall of the balancing chamber partitions the balancing chamber into the upper cavity and the lower cavity. The first spacing is defined between the balancing disk and the ring. Pressure between the balancing chamber and the housing is balanced by adjusting a second spacing. A pair of upthrust washers surrounds the balancing disk and is disposed within the housing between the balancing disk and the balancing chamber. The second spacing is defined between the pair of upthrust washers. Balancing pressure within the balancing chamber and balancing pressure between the balancing chamber and the housing results in balancing a thrust load of the rotatable shaft while the rotatable shaft rotates.
This, and other aspects, can include one or more of the following features.
In some implementations, the balancing disk includes a first portion, a second portion, and a third portion. In some implementations, the first portion includes a first disk disposed within the upper cavity of the balancing chamber. In some implementations, the second portion is tubular and passes through the lower cavity of the balancing chamber. In some implementations, the third portion includes a second disk that is external to the balancing chamber. In some implementations, the pair of upthrust washers is disposed axially in between the balancing chamber and the second disk of the third portion of the balancing disk. In some implementations, adjusting the second spacing includes adjusting an axial spacing between the pair of upthrust washers.
In some implementations, the connecting tube is coupled to the upper cavity of the balancing chamber. In some implementations, establishing fluid communication between the balancing chamber and the exterior of the housing includes establishing fluid communication between the upper cavity of the balancing chamber and the exterior of the housing.
In some implementations, fluid flow is prevented between the upper cavity of the balancing chamber and an interior of the housing by a seal that surrounds the rotatable shaft and is radially disposed between the rotatable shaft and the balancing chamber.
The details of one or more implementations of the subject matter of this disclosure are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
This disclosure describes technologies relating to balancing thrust loads in rotating equipment, and in particular, in protector-less electric submersible pumps (ESPs). ESP systems typically include a centrifugal pump, a protector, a power delivery cable, a motor, and a monitoring tool. The pump can transfer fluid from one location to another. For example, the pump provides artificial lift in a well to boost fluid production from the well. The pump can include multiple pump stages which include impellers and diffusers. The rotating impeller can provide energy to the well fluid, and the stationary diffuser can convert the kinetic energy of the fluid into head (pressure) to facilitate fluid flow. In some cases, pump stages are stacked in series to form a multi-stage pump that is housed within a pump housing. The motor can provide mechanical power to drive a rotatable shaft of the pump. The power delivery cable can supply electrical power to the motor from the surface. The protector can support thrust loads from the pump, transmit power from the motor to the pump, equalize pressure (for example, between the motor and the wellbore within which the ESP resides), provide motor oil to or receive motor oil from the motor according to changes in operating temperature, and prevent well fluid from entering the motor. The monitoring tool can be installed on the motor to measure parameters, such as pump intake and discharge pressures, motor oil and winding temperatures, and vibration. The monitoring tool can transmit measured data to the surface, for example, via the power delivery cable.
In some cases, however, it can be desirable to remove the protector from the artificial lift system because the protector can be prone to various problems that may lead to frequent operational failures of the artificial lift system. The subject matter described in this disclosure can be implemented in particular implementations, so as to realize one or more of the following advantages. The artificial system is configured to operate without the use of a protector. The thrust balancing apparatus included in the artificial lift can fully support the thrust loads of the ESP (that is, develop zero residual thrust) at a range of operating conditions (for example, a range of operating speeds and flow rates) as opposed to a single design point. In contrast, conventional thrust balancing disks can provide full support of the thrust loads of the ESP at a particular design point, and auxiliary components help support residual thrust loads whenever the ESP operates away from the design point. The thrust balancing apparatus described can have similar or the same outer dimensions of a pump stage of an ESP. The thrust balancing apparatus described can be implemented in artificial lift systems in which solid and/or abrasive particles are expected in the well fluid without detrimental effect on functionality of the artificial system. The thrust balancing apparatus described can operate free of lubrication. The thrust balancing apparatus described can improve reliability and extend operating life of artificial lift systems.
In some implementations, the well 100 is a gas well that is used in producing hydrocarbon gas (such as natural gas) from the subterranean zones of interest 110 to the surface 106. While termed a “gas well,” the well need not produce only dry gas, and may incidentally or in much smaller quantities, produce liquid including oil, water, or both. In some implementations, the well 100 is an oil well that is used in producing hydrocarbon liquid (such as crude oil) from the subterranean zones of interest 110 to the surface 106. While termed an “oil well,” the well not need produce only hydrocarbon liquid, and may incidentally or in much smaller quantities, produce gas, water, or both. In some implementations, the production from the well 100 can be multiphase in any ratio. In some implementations, the production from the well 100 can produce mostly or entirely liquid at certain times and mostly or entirely gas at other times. For example, in certain types of wells it is common to produce water for a period of time to gain access to the gas in the subterranean zone. The concepts herein, though, are not limited in applicability to gas wells, oil wells, or even production wells, and could be used in wells for producing other gas or liquid resources or could be used in injection wells, disposal wells, or other types of wells used in placing fluids into the Earth.
The wellbore of the well 100 is typically, although not necessarily, cylindrical. All or a portion of the wellbore is lined with a tubing, such as casing 112. The casing 112 connects with a wellhead at the surface 106 and extends downhole into the wellbore. The casing 112 operates to isolate the bore of the well 100, defined in the cased portion of the well 100 by the inner bore 116 of the casing 112, from the surrounding Earth 108. The casing 112 can be formed of a single continuous tubing or multiple lengths of tubing joined (for example, threadedly) end-to-end. In
The wellhead defines an attachment point for other equipment to be attached to the well 100. For example,
In particular, casing 112 is commercially produced in a number of common sizes specified by the American Petroleum Institute (the “API”), including 4½, 5, 5½, 6, 6⅝, 7, 7⅝, 7¾, 8⅝, 8¾, 9⅝, 9¾, 9⅞, 10¾, 11¾, 11⅞, 13⅜, 13½, 13⅝, 16, 18⅝, and 20 inches, and the API specifies internal diameters for each casing size. The system 200 can be configured to fit in, and (as discussed in more detail below) in certain instances, seal to the inner diameter of one of the specified API casing sizes. Of course, the system 200 can be made to fit in and, in certain instances, seal to other sizes of casing or tubing or otherwise seal to a wall of the well 100.
Additionally, the construction of the components of the system 200 are configured to withstand the impacts, scraping, and other physical challenges the system 200 will encounter while being passed hundreds of feet/meters or even multiple miles/kilometers into and out of the well 100. For example, the system 200 can be disposed in the well 100 at a depth of up to 20,000 feet (6,096 meters). Beyond just a rugged exterior, this encompasses having certain portions of any electronics being ruggedized to be shock resistant and remain fluid tight during such physical challenges and during operation. Additionally, the system 200 is configured to withstand and operate for extended periods of time (for example, multiple weeks, months or years) at the pressures and temperatures experienced in the well 100, which temperatures can exceed 400 degrees Fahrenheit (° F.)/205 degrees Celsius (° C.) and pressures over 2,000 pounds per square inch gauge (psig), and while submerged in the well fluids (gas, water, or oil as examples). Finally, the system 200 can be configured to interface with one or more of the common deployment systems, such as jointed tubing (that is, lengths of tubing joined end-to-end), a sucker rod, coiled tubing (that is, not-jointed tubing, but rather a continuous, unbroken and flexible tubing formed as a single piece of material), or wireline with an electrical conductor (that is, a monofilament or multifilament wire rope with one or more electrical conductors, sometimes called e-line) and thus have a corresponding connector (for example, a jointed tubing connector, coiled tubing connector, or wireline connector).
A seal system 126 is integrated or provided separately with a downhole system, as shown with the system 200, divides the well 100 into an uphole zone 130 above the seal system 126 and a downhole zone 132 below the seal system 126. In some implementations, the seal system 126 is integrated with a tubing (such as tubing 128) uphole of the system 200.
In some implementations, the system 200 can be implemented to alter characteristics of a wellbore by a mechanical intervention at the source. Alternatively, or in addition to any of the other implementations described in this specification, the system 200 can be implemented as a high flow, low pressure rotary device for gas flow in wells. Alternatively, or in addition to any of the other implementations described in this specification, the system 200 can be implemented in a direct well-casing deployment for production through the wellbore. Other implementations of the system 200 as a pump, compressor, or multiphase combination of these can be utilized in the well bore to effect increased well production.
The system 200 locally alters the pressure, temperature, flow rate conditions, or a combination of these of the fluid in the well 100 proximate the system 200. In certain instances, the alteration performed by the system 200 can optimize or help in optimizing fluid flow through the well 100. As described previously, the system 200 creates a pressure differential within the well 100, for example, particularly within the locale in which the system 200 resides. In some instances, the system 200 introduced to the well 100 adjacent the perforations can reduce the pressure in the well 100 near the perforations to induce greater fluid flow from the subterranean zone 110, increase a temperature of the fluid entering the system 200 to reduce condensation from limiting production, increase a pressure in the well 100 uphole of the system 200 to increase fluid flow to the surface 106, or a combination of these.
The system 200 moves the fluid at a first pressure downhole of the system 200 to a second, higher pressure uphole of the system 200. The system 200 can operate at and maintain a pressure ratio across the system 200 between the second, higher uphole pressure and the first, downhole pressure in the wellbore. The pressure ratio of the second pressure to the first pressure can also vary, for example, based on an operating speed of the system 200.
The system 200 can operate in a variety of downhole conditions of the well 100. For example, the initial pressure within the well 100 can vary based on the type of well, depth of the well 100, and production flow from the perforations into the well 100. In some examples, the pressure in the well 100 proximate a bottomhole location is sub-atmospheric, where the pressure in the well 100 is at or below about 14.7 pounds per square inch absolute (psia), or about 101.3 kiloPascal (kPa). The system 200 can operate in sub-atmospheric well pressures, for example, at well pressure between 2 psia (13.8 kPa) and 14.7 psia (101.3 kPa). In some examples, the pressure in the well 100 proximate a bottomhole location is much higher than atmospheric, where the pressure in the well 100 is above about 14.7 pounds per square inch absolute (psia), or about 101.3 kiloPascal (kPa). The system 200 can operate in above atmospheric well pressures, for example, at well pressure between 14.7 psia (101.3 kPa) and 5,000 psia (34,474 kPa).
The system 200 is configured to operate without the use of a protector. Various components of the system 200 perform functions otherwise provided by a typical protector, such that a protector is not required in the system 200. For example, the motor 220 is sealed from the surrounding downhole environment, such that the interior of the motor 220 is not exposed to well fluid. For example, the motor 220 includes a pressure compensator, such as a diaphragm or piston, to equalize pressure between the motor 220 and the wellbore. For example, the motor 220 is coupled to the rotatable shaft 211 by a magnetic coupling, which transmits rotational motion from the motor 220 to the rotatable shaft 211. For example, the motor 220 includes a motor oil expansion chamber that compensates for changes in operating temperature. For example, the thrust balancing apparatus 250 can support thrust loads from the ESP 210. The concepts described here, however, can also be implemented in similar downhole-type systems that include a protector.
The housing 251 houses the other components of the thrust balancing apparatus 250. For example, the balancing chamber 253, the connecting tube 255, the balancing disk 257, the bushing 259, the washer 261, and the upthrust washers 263a and 263b are all disposed within the housing 251. In some implementations, the housing 251 is tubular and has an outer diameter that is the same as or similar to an outer diameter of the pump stages 213 of the ESP 210.
The balancing chamber 253 is coupled to and disposed within the housing 251. The balancing chamber 253 defines an upper cavity 253a and a lower cavity 253b. In some implementations, the balancing chamber 253 is fixed in position in relation to the housing 251. The balancing chamber 253 is made of a material that can withstand corrosion and abrasion during operation. In some implementations, the balancing chamber 253 is made of a similar or the same material as the impellers and/or diffusers of the ESP 210. In some implementations, the balancing chamber 253 is made of an austenitic cast iron alloy that includes nickel, such as Ni-Resist (standard or ductile). In some implementations, an outer diameter of the balancing chamber 253 is equal to or less than about 60% of the diameter of the impellers of the ESP 210. In some implementations, an outer diameter of the balancing chamber 253 is equal to or less than about 50% of the outer diameter of the housing 251. In some implementations, a longitudinal length of the balancing chamber 253 is equal to or less than a longitudinal length of a single pump stage 213 of the ESP 210,
In some implementations, a web structure 290 fixes the balancing chamber 253 in position within the housing 251.
The connecting tube 255 is coupled to the balancing chamber 253 and the housing 251. The connecting tube 255 is configured to establish fluid communication between the balancing chamber 253 and an exterior of the housing 251, such that an interior of the balancing chamber 253 is exposed to fluid surrounding the housing 251 (for example, well fluid). In some implementations, the connecting tube 255 is coupled to the upper cavity 253a of the balancing chamber 253 at one end and coupled to a perforation in the housing 251 at another end. The connecting tube 255 is made of a material that can withstand corrosion and abrasion during operation. In some implementations, the connecting tube 255 is made of similar or the same material as the web structure 290 that supports the balancing chamber 253 within the housing 251. In some implementations, the connecting tube 255 is made of an austenitic cast iron alloy that includes nickel, such as Ni-Resist (standard or ductile). In some implementations, the connecting tube 255 is a part of the web structure 290 that supports the balancing chamber 253 within the housing 251. In some implementations, an inner diameter of the connecting tube 255 is in a range of from about 1/16 inch to about ¼ inch. In some implementations, a longitudinal length of the connecting tube 255 is at least 25% of the inner diameter of the housing 251. Although shown in
Referring back to
The balancing disk 257 is made of a material that can withstand corrosion and abrasion during operation. In some implementations, the balancing disk 257 is made of similar or the same material as the balancing chamber 253. In some implementations, the balancing disk 257 is made of an austenitic cast iron alloy that includes nickel, such as Ni-Resist (standard or ductile).
The bushing 259 surrounds the rotatable shaft 211 of the ESP 210. The bushing 259 is disposed within the housing 251. In some implementations, a portion of the bushing 259 is tubular and a remaining portion of the bushing 259 is shaped like a disk. The bushing 259 is made of a material that can withstand corrosion and abrasion during operation. In some implementations, the bushing 259 is made of similar or the same material as the balancing chamber 253. In some implementations, the bushing 259 is made of austenitic cast iron alloy that includes nickel, such as Ni-Resist (standard or ductile). In some implementations, the bushing 259 is made of copper. In some implementations, the bushing 259 is made of ceramic material, such as zirconia, tungsten carbine, and silicon carbide. In some implementations, the bushing 259 is coupled to the housing 251. In some implementations, the bushing 259 has an outer diameter that is equal to or approximately equal to the outer diameter of the second disk of the third portion 257c of the balancing disk 257.
The washer 261 surrounds the rotatable shaft 211 of the ESP 210. The washer 261 is disposed within the housing 251 between the third portion 257c of the balancing disk 257 and the bushing 259. In some implementations, the washer 261 is axially disposed between the bushing 259 and the second disk of the third portion 257c of the balancing disk 257. In some implementations, the washer 261 is axially disposed between the disk-shaped portion of the bushing 259 and the second disk of the third portion 257c of the balancing disk 257. In such implementations, the washer 261 prevents physical contact between the balancing disk 257 and the bushing 259. The washer 261 can withstand material loss (for example, due to friction) during rotation of the balancing disk 257. In some implementations, the washer 261 is a phenolic washer. In some implementations, an outer diameter of the washer 261 is equal to or approximately equal to the outer diameter of the second disk of the third portion 257c of the balancing disk 257. In some implementations, an outer diameter of the washer 261 is equal to or approximately equal to the outer diameter of the bushing 259. In some implementations, the washer 261 has a thickness of at least 1/16 inch.
The upthrust washers 263a and 263b surround the third portion 257c of the balancing disk 257. The upthrust washers 263a and 263b are disposed within the housing 251 between the third portion 257c of the balancing disk 257 and the balancing chamber 253. In some implementations, the upthrust washers 263a and 263b are axially disposed between balancing chamber 253 and the second disk of the third portion 257c of the balancing disk 257. In such implementations, the upthrust washers 263a and 263b prevent physical contact between the balancing chamber 253 and the second disk of the third portion 257c of the balancing disk 257. In some implementations, the upthrust washer 263a is fixed to the exterior of the balancing chamber 253, and the upthrust washer 263b is fixed to the second disk of the third portion 257c of the balancing disk 257. In such implementations, the upthrust washer 263a remains stationary, while the upthrust washer 263b rotates with the rotatable shaft 211 during operation of the system 200. Similar to the washer 261, the upthrust washers 263a and 263b can withstand material loss (for example, due to friction) during counter-rotation with respect to each other and during rotation of the balancing disk 257. In some implementations, the upthrust washers 263a and 263b are phenolic washers. In some implementations, an outer diameter of the upthrust washers 263a and 263b is equal to or approximately equal to the outer diameter of the second disk of the third portion 257c of the balancing disk 257. In some implementations, the upthrust washers 263a and 263b have a thickness of at least 1/16 inch each.
In some implementations, the upper cavity 253a and the lower cavity 253b of the balancing chamber 253 are partitioned by a ring 265 that lines an inner circumferential wall of the balancing chamber 253. In such implementations, the second portion 257b (tubular portion) of the balancing disk 257 passes through the ring 265. In such implementations, a first spacing 267a is defined between the ring 265 and the first disk of the first portion 257a of the balancing disk 257, and a second spacing 267b is defined between the upthrust washer 263a and the upthrust washer 263b. The first spacing 267a and the second spacing 267b can be adjusted to balance a thrust load of the rotatable shaft 211 of the ESP 210.
In some implementations, the thrust balancing apparatus 250 includes a seal 269 that surrounds the rotatable shaft 211 and is radially disposed between the balancing chamber 253 and the rotatable shaft 211 of the ESP 210. In some implementations, the seal 269 is configured to prevent fluid flow between the upper cavity 253a of the balancing chamber 253 and an interior of the housing 251 while the rotatable shaft 211 rotates. The selection of the seal 269 can depend on various parameters, such as range of operating temperature, range of operating pressure, type of fluid that the seal 269 is expected to be exposed to, and acceptable leakage level. In some implementations, the seal 269 is a labyrinth-type seal, which is typically associated with insignificant mechanical losses and leakage power losses that do not significantly affect overall pumping efficiency.
Before operation of the ESP 210, the balancing disk 257 rests on top of the washer 261, which rests on top of the disk-shaped portion of the bushing 259. At the beginning of operation of the ESP 210, the pressure within the housing 251 (exterior to the balancing chamber 253) is the greatest pressure in the system thrust balancing apparatus 250. This pressure imposes a downward thrust on the rotatable shaft 211, resulting in a downward axial movement of the rotatable shaft 211 and the balancing disk 257, which is fixed to the rotatable shaft 211. This downward axial movement decreases the first spacing 267a (low-pressure orifice) and increases the second spacing 267b (high-pressure orifice). This downward axial movement also causes the pressure within the lower cavity 253b to increase, as more well fluid flows into the lower cavity 253b. The increase in pressure within the lower cavity 253b imparts an upward thrust on the balancing disk 257 and, in turn, on the rotatable shaft 211. The cross-sectional area of the first disk of the first portion of the balancing disk 257 can be designed to be sufficiently large to develop the upward thrust to lift the rotatable shaft 211. The upward thrust results in an upward axial movement of the rotatable shaft 211 and the balancing disk 257. The upward axial movement increases the first spacing 267a (low-pressure orifice) and decreases the second spacing 267b (high-pressure orifice). The decrease in the second spacing 267b increases the pressure drop across the second spacing 267b. The simultaneous increase in the first spacing 267a allows for the pressure within the lower cavity 253b to decrease. Both of these effects can reduce the effect of the upward thrust. This “push-and-pull” continues in the thrust balancing apparatus 250 until the balancing disk 257 reaches an equilibrium point that fully supports the thrust load of the ESP 210. The thrust balancing apparatus 250 is capable of reaching equilibrium points across a range of operating conditions of the ESP 210 (for example, different combinations of pumping speeds and flow rates).
At step 304, pressure within the balancing chamber 253 is balanced by adjusting a first spacing (for example, the first spacing 267a). The first spacing 267a can be increased or decreased at step 304. As described previously, the balancing disk 257 is coupled to and surrounds the rotatable shaft 211 (of the ESP 210), which passes through the balancing chamber 253. The ring 265 partitions the balancing chamber 253 into the upper cavity 253a and the lower cavity 253b. The first spacing 267a is defined between the balancing disk 257 and the ring 265.
At step 306, pressure between the balancing chamber 253 and the housing 251 is balanced by adjusting a second spacing (for example, the second spacing 267b). The second spacing 267b can be increased or decreased at step 306. As described previously, the upthrust washers 263a and 263b surround the balancing disk 257 and are disposed within the housing 251 between the balancing disk 257 and the balancing chamber 253. The second spacing 267b is defined between the upthrust washers 263a and 263b. Balancing pressure within the balancing chamber 253 and balancing pressure between the balancing chamber 253 and the housing 251 results in balancing a thrust load of the rotatable shaft 211 while the rotatable shaft 211 rotates. In some implementations, adjusting the second spacing 267b includes adjusting an axial spacing between the upthrust washers 263a and 263b.
In some implementations, fluid flow between the upper cavity 253a of the balancing chamber 253 and an interior of the housing 251 is prevented by a seal (for example, the seal 269). As described previously, the seal 269 can surround the rotatable shaft 211 and be radially disposed between the rotatable shaft 211 and the balancing chamber 253. Although shown in
While this specification contains many specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular implementations. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate implementations can also be implemented, in combination, in a single implementation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple implementations, separately, or in any sub-combination. Moreover, although previously described features may be described as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can, in some cases, be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or variation of a sub-combination.
As used in this disclosure, the terms “a,” “an,” or “the” are used to include one or more than one unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. The term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive “or” unless otherwise indicated. The statement “at least one of A and B” has the same meaning as “A, B, or A and B.” In addition, it is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed in this disclosure, and not otherwise defined, is for the purpose of description only and not of limitation. Any use of section headings is intended to aid reading of the document and is not to be interpreted as limiting; information that is relevant to a section heading may occur within or outside of that particular section.
As used in this disclosure, the term “about” or “approximately” can allow for a degree of variability in a value or range, for example, within 10%, within 5%, or within 1% of a stated value or of a stated limit of a range.
As used in this disclosure, the term “substantially” refers to a majority of, or mostly, as in at least about 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, 99.99%, or at least about 99.999% or more.
Values expressed in a range format should be interpreted in a flexible manner to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited. For example, a range of “0.1% to about 5%” or “0.1% to 5%” should be interpreted to include about 0.1% to about 5%, as well as the individual values (for example, 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4%) and the sub-ranges (for example, 0.1% to 0.5%, 1.1% to 2.2%, 3.3% to 4.4%) within the indicated range. The statement “X to Y” has the same meaning as “about X to about Y,” unless indicated otherwise. Likewise, the statement “X, Y, or Z” has the same meaning as “about X, about Y, or about Z,” unless indicated otherwise.
Particular implementations of the subject matter have been described. Other implementations, alterations, and permutations of the described implementations are within the scope of the following claims as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. While operations are depicted in the drawings or claims in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed (some operations may be considered optional), to achieve desirable results. In certain circumstances, multitasking or parallel processing (or a combination of multitasking and parallel processing) may be advantageous and performed as deemed appropriate.
Moreover, the separation or integration of various system modules and components in the previously described implementations should not be understood as requiring such separation or integration in all implementations, and it should be understood that the described components and systems can generally be integrated together or packaged into multiple products.
Accordingly, the previously described example implementations do not define or constrain the present disclosure. Other changes, substitutions, and alterations are also possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
335164 | Vitalis | Feb 1886 | A |
646887 | Stowe et al. | Apr 1900 | A |
1485504 | Hollander | Mar 1924 | A |
1559155 | Bullock | Oct 1925 | A |
1677093 | Johnson | Jul 1928 | A |
1912452 | Hollander | Jun 1933 | A |
1978277 | Noble | Oct 1934 | A |
2287027 | Cummins | Jun 1942 | A |
2556435 | Moehrl | Jun 1951 | A |
2625110 | Haentjens et al. | Jan 1953 | A |
2641191 | Alfred | Jun 1953 | A |
2782720 | Dochterman | Feb 1957 | A |
2845869 | Herbenar | Aug 1958 | A |
2866417 | Otto | Dec 1958 | A |
2931384 | Clark | Apr 1960 | A |
3007418 | Brundage et al. | Nov 1961 | A |
3034484 | Stefancin | May 1962 | A |
3038698 | Troyer | Jun 1962 | A |
3123010 | Witt et al. | Mar 1964 | A |
3129875 | Cirillo | Apr 1964 | A |
3139835 | Wilkinson | Jul 1964 | A |
3158415 | Garnder | Nov 1964 | A |
3171355 | Harris et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3175403 | Nelson | Mar 1965 | A |
3251226 | Cushing | May 1966 | A |
3272130 | Mosbacher | Sep 1966 | A |
3413925 | Campolong | Dec 1968 | A |
3516765 | Boyadjieff | Jun 1970 | A |
3638732 | Huntsinger et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3680989 | Brundage | Aug 1972 | A |
3724503 | Cooke | Apr 1973 | A |
3746461 | Yokota | Jul 1973 | A |
3771910 | Laing | Nov 1973 | A |
3795145 | Miller | Mar 1974 | A |
3814486 | Schurger | Jun 1974 | A |
3839914 | Modisette et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3874812 | Hanagarth | Apr 1975 | A |
3961758 | Morgan | Jun 1976 | A |
3975117 | Carter | Aug 1976 | A |
4025244 | Sato | May 1977 | A |
4096211 | Rameau | Jun 1978 | A |
4139330 | Neal | Feb 1979 | A |
4154302 | Cugini | May 1979 | A |
4181175 | McGee et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4226275 | Frosch | Oct 1980 | A |
4266607 | Halstead | May 1981 | A |
4289199 | McGee | Sep 1981 | A |
4336415 | Walling | Jun 1982 | A |
4374530 | Walling | Feb 1983 | A |
4387685 | Abbey | Jun 1983 | A |
4417474 | Elderton | Nov 1983 | A |
4425965 | Bayh, III et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4440221 | Taylor et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4476923 | Walling | Oct 1984 | A |
4491176 | Reed | Jan 1985 | A |
4497185 | Shaw | Feb 1985 | A |
4576043 | Nguyen | Mar 1986 | A |
4580634 | Cruise | Apr 1986 | A |
4582131 | Plummer et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4586854 | Newman et al. | May 1986 | A |
4619323 | Gidley | Oct 1986 | A |
4627489 | Reed | Dec 1986 | A |
4632187 | Bayh, III et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4658583 | Shropshire | Apr 1987 | A |
4662437 | Renfro | May 1987 | A |
4665981 | Hayatdavoudi | May 1987 | A |
4741668 | Bearden et al. | May 1988 | A |
4757709 | Czernichow | Jul 1988 | A |
RE32866 | Cruise | Feb 1989 | E |
4838758 | Sheth | Jun 1989 | A |
4850812 | Voight | Jul 1989 | A |
4856344 | Hunt | Aug 1989 | A |
4867633 | Gravelle | Sep 1989 | A |
4969364 | Masuda | Nov 1990 | A |
4986739 | Child | Jan 1991 | A |
5033937 | Wilson | Jul 1991 | A |
5094294 | Bayh, III et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5158440 | Cooper et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5169286 | Yamada | Dec 1992 | A |
5180014 | Cox | Jan 1993 | A |
5195882 | Freeman | Mar 1993 | A |
5201848 | Powers | Apr 1993 | A |
5209650 | Lemieux | May 1993 | A |
5261796 | Niemiec et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269377 | Martin | Dec 1993 | A |
5285008 | Sas-Jaworsky et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5323661 | Cheng | Jun 1994 | A |
5334801 | Mohn | Aug 1994 | A |
5335542 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5337603 | McFarland et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5358378 | Holscher | Oct 1994 | A |
5482117 | Kolpak | Jan 1996 | A |
5494413 | Campen et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5591922 | Segeral et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5605193 | Bearden et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5613311 | Burtch | Mar 1997 | A |
5620048 | Beauquin | Apr 1997 | A |
5641915 | Ortiz | Jun 1997 | A |
5649811 | Krol, Jr. et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653585 | Fresco et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5693891 | Brown | Dec 1997 | A |
5736650 | Hiron et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755288 | Bearden et al. | May 1998 | A |
5834659 | Ortiz | Nov 1998 | A |
5845709 | Mack et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848642 | Sola | Dec 1998 | A |
5880378 | Behring | Mar 1999 | A |
5886267 | Ortiz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5905208 | Ortiz et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908049 | Williams et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921285 | Quigley et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5954305 | Calabro | Sep 1999 | A |
6113675 | Branstetter | Sep 2000 | A |
6129507 | Ganelin | Oct 2000 | A |
6148866 | Quigley et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6155102 | Toma | Dec 2000 | A |
6164308 | Butler | Dec 2000 | A |
6167965 | Bearden et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176323 | Weirich | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179269 | Kobylinski et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192983 | Neuroth et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6257332 | Vidrine et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264440 | Klein et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286558 | Quigley et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289990 | Dillon et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298917 | Kobylinski et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325143 | Scarsdale | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6357485 | Quigley et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6361272 | Bassett | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6413065 | Dass | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6414239 | Gasque, Jr. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427778 | Beall et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454010 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463810 | Liu | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6530211 | Holtzapple et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6544013 | Kato et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6546812 | Lewis | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6547519 | deBlanc et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6550327 | Van Berk | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557642 | Head | May 2003 | B2 |
6601460 | Materna | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6601651 | Grant | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6604550 | Quigley et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6629564 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6679692 | Feuling et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681894 | Fanguy | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6726449 | James et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6733249 | Maier et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6741000 | Newcomb | May 2004 | B2 |
6755609 | Preinfalk | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6776054 | Stephenson | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6807857 | Storm, Jr. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6808371 | Niwatsukino et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811382 | Buchanan et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6848539 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856132 | Appel et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6857452 | Quigley et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863137 | Terry et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6935189 | Richards | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6993979 | Segeral | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7017681 | Ivannikov et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7021905 | Torrey et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032662 | Malone et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7086294 | DeLong | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7093665 | Dass | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107860 | Jones | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7226279 | Andoskin et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7259688 | Hirsch et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7262532 | Seidler et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7275592 | Davis | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7275711 | Flanigan | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7338262 | Gozdawa | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7377312 | Davis | May 2008 | B2 |
7647948 | Quigley et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7670122 | Phillips et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7670451 | Head | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7699099 | Bolding et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7730937 | Head | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7762715 | Gordon et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7770650 | Young et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7775763 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7819640 | Kalavsky et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7841395 | Gay et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7841826 | Phillips | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7849928 | Collie | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7905295 | Mack | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8013660 | Fitzi | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8016545 | Oklejas et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8066033 | Quigley et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067865 | Savant | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8197602 | Baron | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8235126 | Bradley | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8261841 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8302736 | Olivier | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8337142 | Eslinger et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8419398 | Kothnur et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8506257 | Bottome | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8568081 | Song et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579617 | Ono et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8771499 | McCutchen et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8821138 | Holtzapple et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8905728 | Blankemeier et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8936430 | Bassett | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8950476 | Head | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8960309 | Davis | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8973433 | Mulford | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9080336 | Yantis | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9133709 | Huh et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9157297 | Williamson, Jr. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9200932 | Sittler | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9203277 | Kori et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9234529 | Meuter | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9353614 | Roth et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9383476 | Trehan | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9500073 | Alan et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9540908 | Olivier | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9574438 | Flores | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9587456 | Roth | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9593561 | Xiao et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9631482 | Roth et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9677560 | Davis et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9759025 | Vavik | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9759041 | Osborne | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9915134 | Xiao et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9932806 | Stewart | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9951598 | Roth et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9964533 | Ahmad | May 2018 | B2 |
9982519 | Melo | May 2018 | B2 |
10100596 | Roth et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10138885 | Ejim et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10151194 | Roth et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10253610 | Roth et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10273399 | Cox et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10287853 | Ejim et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10308865 | Cox et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10323644 | Shakirov et al. | Jun 2019 | B1 |
10337302 | Roth et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10337312 | Xiao et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10378322 | Ejim et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10465477 | Abdelaziz et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10465484 | Turner et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10487259 | Cox et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10501682 | Cox et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10533558 | Melo et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10578111 | Xiao et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20020074742 | Quoiani | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020079100 | Simpson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020109080 | Tubel et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020121376 | Rivas | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020153141 | Hartman | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030079880 | Deaton et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030141071 | Hosie | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030161739 | Chu et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030185676 | James | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030226395 | Storm et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040060705 | Kelley | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050098349 | Krueger et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050166961 | Means | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050217859 | Hartman | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050254943 | Fukuchi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060076956 | Sjolie et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060096760 | Ohmer | May 2006 | A1 |
20070193749 | Folk | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080093084 | Knight | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080187434 | Neiszer | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080236842 | Bhavsar et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262737 | Thigpen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080264182 | Jones | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080290876 | Ameen | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080292454 | Brunner | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090001304 | Hansen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090016899 | Davis | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090090513 | Bissonnette | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090110579 | Amburgey | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090151928 | Lawson | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090151953 | Brown | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090255669 | Ayan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090289627 | Johansen et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090293634 | Ong | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100040492 | Eslinger et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100122818 | Rooks | May 2010 | A1 |
20100206577 | Martinez | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100236794 | Duan | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244404 | Bradley | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100258306 | Camilleri | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100288493 | Fielder et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100300413 | Ulrey et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110017459 | Dinkins | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110024107 | Sunyovszky et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110024231 | Wurth et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110036568 | Barbosa | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110036662 | Smith | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110155390 | Lannom et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110162832 | Reid | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185805 | Roux et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110203848 | Krueger et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110278094 | Gute | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110296911 | Moore | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110300008 | Fielder et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120012327 | Plunkett et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120282119 | Floyd | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130019673 | Sroka | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130300833 | Perkins | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130048302 | Gokdag et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130051977 | Song | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130066139 | Wiessler | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130068454 | Armistead | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073208 | Dorovsky | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130081460 | Xiao et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130175030 | Ige | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130189123 | Stokley | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130213663 | Lau et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130248429 | Dahule | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130255370 | Roux et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130259721 | Noui-Mehidi | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140012507 | Trehan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140014331 | Crocker | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140027546 | Kean et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140037422 | Gilarranz | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140041862 | Ersoz | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140116720 | He et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140144706 | Bailey et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140209291 | Watson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140265337 | Harding et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140341714 | Casa | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140343857 | Pfutzner | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140377080 | Xiao et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150068769 | Xiao et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150071795 | Vazquez et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150192141 | Nowitzki et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150204336 | McManus | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150233228 | Roth | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150308245 | Stewart et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150308444 | Trottman | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150330194 | June et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150354308 | June et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150354590 | Kao | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150376907 | Nguyen | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160010451 | Melo | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160016834 | Dahule | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160169231 | Michelassi et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160305447 | Dreiss et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160332856 | Steedley | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170058664 | Xiao et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170074082 | Palmer | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170122046 | Vavik | May 2017 | A1 |
20170138189 | Ahmad et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170159668 | Nowitzki et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170167498 | Chang | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170175752 | Hofer et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170183942 | Veland | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170194831 | Marvel | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170292533 | Zia | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170321695 | Head | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170328151 | Dillard | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170350399 | Eslinger | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180058157 | Melo et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180066671 | Murugan | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180171763 | Malbrel et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180171767 | Huynh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180172020 | Ejim | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180226174 | Rose | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180238152 | Melo | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180306199 | Reed | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180320059 | Cox et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180340389 | Wang | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180363660 | Klahn | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190032667 | Ifrim et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190040863 | Davis et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190271217 | Radov et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190368291 | Xiao et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200056462 | Xiao et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200056615 | Xiao et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1226325 | Sep 1987 | CA |
2629578 | Oct 2009 | CA |
2168104 | Jun 1994 | CN |
1507531 | Jun 2004 | CN |
101328769 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101842547 | Sep 2010 | CN |
202851445 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103185025 | Jul 2013 | CN |
203420906 | Feb 2014 | CN |
104141633 | Nov 2014 | CN |
104533797 | Apr 2015 | CN |
103835988 | Jan 2016 | CN |
105239963 | Jan 2016 | CN |
103717901 | Jun 2016 | CN |
2260678 | Jun 1974 | DE |
3022241 | Dec 1981 | DE |
3444859 | Jun 1985 | DE |
3520884 | Jan 1986 | DE |
19654092 | Jul 1998 | DE |
10307887 | Oct 2004 | DE |
10346647 | May 2005 | DE |
102007005426 | May 2008 | DE |
102008001607 | Nov 2009 | DE |
102008054766 | Jun 2010 | DE |
102012215023 | Jan 2014 | DE |
102012022453 | May 2014 | DE |
102013200450 | Jul 2014 | DE |
102012205757 | Aug 2014 | DE |
0579981 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0637675 | Feb 1995 | EP |
1101024 | May 2001 | EP |
1143104 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1270900 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1369588 | Dec 2003 | EP |
2801696 | Dec 2014 | EP |
2893301 | May 2018 | EP |
3527830 | Aug 2019 | EP |
670206 | Apr 1952 | GB |
2173034 | Oct 1986 | GB |
2226776 | Jul 1990 | GB |
2283035 | Apr 1995 | GB |
2348674 | Oct 2000 | GB |
2477909 | Aug 2011 | GB |
2504104 | Jan 2014 | GB |
4019375 | Jan 1992 | JP |
2005076486 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2013110910 | Jun 2013 | JP |
98500 | Oct 2010 | RU |
122531 | Nov 2012 | RU |
178531 | Apr 2018 | RU |
WO 1995004869 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 1998046857 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 1999027256 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 2002072998 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 2005066502 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2009113894 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009129607 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2011066050 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2011101296 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2011133620 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO 2011135541 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO 2012058290 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2012166638 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO 2013089746 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO 2013171053 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO 2014127035 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 2014147645 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO 2015034482 | Mar 2015 | WO |
WO 2015041655 | Mar 2015 | WO |
WO 2015084926 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO 2015123236 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO 2016003662 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO 2016012245 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO 2016050301 | Apr 2016 | WO |
WO 2016081389 | May 2016 | WO |
WO 2016089526 | Jun 2016 | WO |
WO 2016160016 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO 2016195643 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO 2017021553 | Feb 2017 | WO |
WO 2018022198 | Feb 2018 | WO |
WO 2018096345 | May 2018 | WO |
WO 2019243789 | Dec 2019 | WO |
WO 2020165046 | Aug 2020 | WO |
WO-2020165046 | Aug 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2021/046862, dated Dec. 10, 2021, 15 pages. |
Abelsson et al., “Development and Testing of a Hybrid Boosting Pump,” OTC 21516, Offshore Technology Conference (OTC), presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, May 2-5, 2011, 9 pages. |
Alhanati et al., “ESP Failures: Can we talk the same language?” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), SPE paper, SPE ESP Workshop held in Houston, Apr. 25-27, 2001, 11 page. |
Alhasan et al., “Extending mature field production life using a multiphase twin screw pump,” BHR Group Multiphase 15, 2011, 11 pages. |
BakerHughes.com, [online], “Multiphase Pump: Increases Efficiency and Production in Wells with High Gas Content,” Brochure overview, retrieved from URL <https://assets.www.bakerhughes.com/system/69/00d970d9dd11e3a411ddf3c1325ea6/28592.MVP_ Overview.pdf>, 2014, 2 pages. |
Blunt, “Effects of heterogeneity and wetting on relative permeability using pore level modeling,” SPE 36762, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), SPE Journal 2:01 (70-87), Mar. 1997, 19 pages. |
Bryant and Blunt, “Prediction of relative permeability in simple porous media,” Physical Review A 46:4, Aug. 1992, 8 pages. |
Champion et al., “The application of high-power sound waves for wellbore cleaning,” SPE 82197, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, May 13-14, 2003, 10 pages. |
Chappell and Lancaster, “Comparison of methodological uncertainties within permeability measurements,” Wiley InterScience, Hydrological Processes 21:18 (2504-2514), Jan. 2007, 11 pages. |
Cramer et al., “Development and Application of a Downhole Chemical Injection Pump for Use in ESP Applications,” SPE 14403, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 66th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 22-25, 1985, 6 page. |
Danfoss, “Facts Worth Knowing about Frequency Converters,” Handbook VLT Frequency Converters, Danfoss Engineering Tomorrow, 180 pages. |
DiCarlo et al., “Three-phase relative permeability of water-wet, oil-wet, and mixed-wet sandpacks,” SPE 60767, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 1998 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 27-30, 1998, SPE Journal 5:01 (82-91), Mar. 2000, 10 pages. |
Dixit et al., “A pore-level investigation of relative permeability hysteresis in water-wet systems,” SPE 37233, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 1997 SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Feb. 18-21, 1997, SPE Journal 3:02 (115-123), Jun. 1998, 9 pages. |
ejprescott.com [online], “Water, Sewer and Drain Fittings B-22, Flange Adaptors,” retrieved from URL <https://www.ejprescott.com/media/reference/FlangeAdaptorsB-22.pdf> retrieved on Jun. 15, 2020, available on or before Nov. 2010 via wayback machine URL <http://web.archive.org/web/20101128181255/https://www.ejprescott.com/media/reference/FlangeA daptorsB-22.pdf>, 5 pages. |
Fatt, “The network model of porous media,” SPE 574-G, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), I. Capillary Pressure Characteristics, AIME Petroleum Transactions 207: 144-181, Dec. 1956, 38 pages. |
Geary et al., “Downhole Pressme Boosting in Natural Gas Wells: Results from Prototype Testing,” SPE 11406, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 20-22, 2008, 13 pages. |
Godbole et al., “Axial Thrust in Centrifugal Pumps—Experimental Analysis,” Paper Ref: 2977, presented at the 15th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics, ICEM15, Jul. 22-27, 2012, 14 pages. |
Heiba et al., “Percolation theory of two-phase relative permeability,” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), SPE Reservoir Engineering 7:01 (123-132), Feb. 1992, 11 pages. |
Hua et al., “Comparison of Multiphase Pumping Techniques for Subsea and Downhole Applications,” SPE 146784, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 2011, Oil and Gas Facilities, Feb. 2012, 11 pages. |
Hui and Blunt, “Effects of wettability on three-phase flow in porous media” American Chemical Society (ACS), J. Phys. Chem. 104 :16 (3833-3845), Feb. 2000, 13 pages. |
Krag et al., “Preventing Scale Deposition Downhole Using High Frequency Electromagnetic AC Signals from Surface Enhance Production Offshore Denmark,” SPE-170898-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 27-29, 2014, 10 pages. |
laserfocusworld.com [online], “High-Power Lasers: Fiber lasers drill for oil,” Dec. 5, 2012, retrieved on May 31, 2018, retrieved from URL: <https://www.laserfocusworld.com/articles/print/volume-48/issue-12/world-news/high-power-lasers-fiber-lasers-drill-for-oil.html>, 4 pages. |
Li et al., “In Situ Estimation of Relative Permeability from Resistivity Measurements,” EAGE/The Geological Society of London, Petroleum Geoscience 20: 143-151, 2014, 10 pages. |
machinedesign.com [online], Frances Richards, “Motors for efficiency: Permanent-magnet, reluctance, and induction motors compared,” Apr. 2013, retrieved on Nov. 11, 2020, retrieved from URL <https://www.machinedesign.com/motors-drives/article/21832406/motors-for-efficiency-permanentmagnet-reluctance-and-induction-motors-compared>. |
Mahmud et al., “Effect of network topology on two-phase imbibition relative permeability,” Transport in Porous Media 66:3 (481-493), Feb. 2007, 14 pages. |
Mirza, “The Next Generation of Progressive Cavity Multiphase Pumps use a Novel Design Concept for Superior Performance and Wet Gas Compression,” Flow Loop Testing, BHR Group, 2007, 9 pages. |
Mirza, “Three Generations of Multiphase Progressive Cavity Pumping,” Cahaba Media Group, Upstream Pumping Solutions, Winter 2012, 6 pages. |
Muswar et al., “Physical Water Treatment in the Oil Field Results from Indonesia,” SPE 113526, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 18-20, 2010, 11 pages. |
Nagy et al., “Comparison of permeability testing methods,” Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 399-402, 2013, 4 pages. |
Parker, “About Gerotors,” Parker Haffinfin Corp, 2008, 2 pages. |
Purcell, “Capillary pressures—their measurement using mercury and the calculation of permeability therefrom,” Petroleum Transactions, AIME, presented at the Branch Fall Meeting, Oct. 4-6, 1948, Journal of Petroleum Technology 1:02 (39-48), Feb. 1949, 10 pages. |
Rzeznik et al., “Two Year Results of a Breakthrough Physical Water Treating System for the Control of Scale in Oilfield Applications,” SPE114072, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the 2008 SPE International Oilfield Scale Conference, May 28-29, 2008, 11 pages. |
Schöneberg, “Wet Gas Compression with Twin Screw Pumps,” Bornemann Pumps, Calgary Pump Symposium 2005, 50 pages. |
Simpson et al., “A Touch, Truly Multiphase Downhole Pump for Unconventional Wells,” SPE-185152-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Electric Submersible Pump Symposium, the Woodlands, Texas, Apr. 24-28, 2017, 20 pages. |
slb.com [online], “AGH: Advanced Gas-Handling Device,” Product Sheet, retrieved from URL: <http://www.slb.com/˜/media/Files/artificial_lift/product_sheets/ESPs/advanced_gas_handling_ps.pdf>. Jan. 2014, 2 pages. |
Sulzer Technical Review, “Pushing the Boundaries of Centrifugal Pump Design,” Oil and Gas, Jan. 2014, 2 pages. |
tm4.com [online], “Outer rotor for greater performance,” available on or before Dec. 5, 2017, via internet archive: Wayback Machine URL <https://web.archive.org/web/20171205163856/https://www.tm4.com/technology/electric-motors/external-rotor-motor-technology/>, retrieved on May 17, 2017, retrieved from URL <https://www.tm4.com/technology/electric-motors/external-rotor-motor-technology/>, 2 pages. |
Wylde et al., “Deep Downhole Chemical Injection on BP-Operated Miller: Experience and Learning,” SPE 92832, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 2005 SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, May 11-12, 2005, SPE Production & Operations, May 2006, 6 pages. |
Xiao et al., “Induction Versus Permanent Magnet Motors for ESP Applications,” SPE-192177-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Apr. 23-26, 2018, 15 pages. |
Zhan et al., “Characterization of Reservoir Heterogeneity Through Fluid Movement Monitoring with Deep Electromagnetic and Pressure Measurements,” SPE 116328, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the 2008 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 21-24, 2008, 16 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220056913 A1 | Feb 2022 | US |