The present application generally relates to sensors and in particular, relates to measurement of a resistive sensor.
Sensors are devices that are sometimes used for sensing various environmental conditions or structural health conditions. Environmental or structural sensors sense a condition of interest and communicate in a wired or wireless fashion with a reader apparatus. Multiple sensors may be deployed to monitor multiple spatial locations of a structure or an environment, and these sensors may also be referred to as sensor nodes.
One or more states of a target material within a sensor may change when the target material is exposed to certain environmental conditions. For example, a target material may be subject to corrosion when exposed to certain temperature, mechanical vibration, humidity or moisture conditions over a period of time, such that physical and chemical characteristics of the target material may change over the same period of time. As another example, a target material in a crack sensor may be subject to mechanical stress reflective of a structural component within a vehicle such as an aircraft, such that one or more physical characteristics of the target material may change in response to a change in structural health condition of the monitored component. A sensor apparatus may be used to monitor a state of the target material.
Sometimes a sensor communicates with a reader using a wireless transceiver and antennas included in the sensor. The sensor uses an external or battery-powered energy source to operate the transceiver and/or other components of the sensor.
Aspects of the present application allow for measurement of a calibrated resistance for a resistive film in a sensing element, such that effects from contact resistance and background resistance drifts due to factors such as temperature, strain or aging can be reduced or eliminated. In some embodiments, by taking a plurality of two-terminal resistance measurements between various pairs of electrodes on a resistive film, a contact-resistance-independent resistance of a reference portion of the resistive film can be determined. Further, a contact-resistance-independent resistance of a sensing portion of the resistive film can be determined based on a plurality of two-terminal resistance measurements between pairs of electrodes. The resistance of the reference portion can be removed from the measured resistance of the sensing portion, such that variations in the reference portion resistance that are not caused by a sensed environmental condition may be compensated.
According to some embodiments, a self-compensating sensor is provided. The self-compensating sensor comprises a sensing element. The sensing element comprises a polymer nano composite (PNC) film. The self-compensating sensor further comprises a plurality of electrical breakout points disposed on the sensing element; a measurement circuit coupled to the plurality of electrical breakout points. The measurement circuit is configured to measure a plurality of resistance values between a plurality of pairs of electrical breakout points selected from the plurality of electrical breakout points; based on the plurality of resistance values, calculate a first resistance of a sensing portion of the PNC film exposed to an environment; based on the plurality of resistance values, calculate a second resistance of a reference portion of the PNC film adjacent the sensing portion; and determine a compensated resistance by comparing the first resistance of the sensing portion and the second resistance of the reference portion. The compensated resistance is indicative of a sensed condition of the environment.
According to some embodiments, a method for sensing a structural health condition of a structure using a sensing element is provided. The sensing element comprises a resistive film and a plurality of linearly arranged electrodes in electrical contact with the resistive film. The method comprises measuring a plurality of resistance values between a plurality of pairs of electrodes selected from the plurality of linearly arranged electrodes; based on the plurality of resistance values, calculating a contact-resistance-independent resistance value of a sensing portion of the resistive film; based on the plurality of measured resistance values, calculating a contact-resistance-independent resistance value of a reference portion of the resistive film; and determining a compensated resistance value by combining the resistance value of the sensing portion and the resistance value of the reference portion, such that the compensated resistance is indicative of the structural health condition.
According to some embodiments, a sensor is provided. The sensor comprises a resistive film having a sensing portion and a reference portion adjacent to the sensing portion; a plurality of linearly arranged electrodes including a first pair of electrodes contacting the sensing portion and a second pair of electrodes contacting the reference portion; a measurement circuit coupled to the plurality of linearly arranged electrodes. The measurement circuit is configured to measure a plurality of resistance values between a plurality of pairs of electrodes selected from the plurality of electrodes; based on the plurality of resistance values, calculate a contact-resistance-independent resistance value of the sensing portion; based on the plurality of measured resistance values, calculate a contact-resistance-independent resistance value of the reference portion; and determine a compensated resistance value by combining the resistance value of the sensing portion and the resistance value of the reference portion.
Various aspects and embodiments of the application will be described with reference to the following figures. It should be appreciated that the figures are not necessarily drawn to scale. Items appearing in multiple figures are indicated by the same reference number in all the figures in which they appear. In the drawings:
Aspects of the invention are directed to a self-compensating sensor based on resistive sensing elements having a polymer nano composite (PNC) film and a plurality of electrodes in contact with various points on the PNC film. One goal of the present application is directed to countering two factors that may influence accurate measurement of resistance in a resistive environmental sensor. The inventors have recognized and appreciated that when using a resistive film to sense a condition of the environment, such as the state of corrosion or a structural crack length, the measured resistance value may be influenced by material properties of the resistor itself, irrespective of environmental conditions. In addition, the measured resistance values may be influenced to a significant degree by the contact resistance between the PNC film and respective electrodes.
Embodiments of the present application provide a solution that addresses both such influences of the measured resistance value. In some embodiments, by taking a plurality of two-terminal resistance measurements between various pairs of electrodes on the resistive strip, a contact-resistance-independent resistance of a reference portion of the PNC film can be determined. Further, a contact-resistance-independent resistance of a sensing portion of the PNC film can be determined based on a plurality of two-terminal resistance measurements between pairs of electrodes. The resistance of the reference portion can be removed from the measured resistance of the sensing portion, such that variations in the reference portion resistance that are not caused by a sensed environmental condition may be compensated.
Some aspects of the present application allow for measurement of a calibrated resistance for a resistive film in a sensing element, such that effects from contact resistance and background resistance drifts due to factors such as temperature, strain or aging can be reduced or eliminated.
According to some aspects of the present application, a sensing element in a sensor has a resistive film, where resistance value of at least a portion of the resistive film can be indicative of a sensed condition. For example, a portion of the resistive film may be exposed to mechanical stress or a corrosive environment, and its resistance value can represent a state of structural health, a state of corrosion, or a state of erosion. The inventors have recognized and appreciated that resistance of a resistive film in a sensor apparatus may be subject to background drift over a period of time and overall signals measured may comprise a sensor signal superimposed on the background drift. The background drift may be caused by, for example, internal temperature and humidity changes that are unrelated to the environment of the target material is disposed in. Moreover, in a resistive sensor, the resistive film to contact junction resistance adds a bias error to two-terminal resistance measurements, which makes it hard to accurately measure resistance of the resistive film itself, and accurately measure changes to the resistive film resistance due to change in sensed conditions.
A calibration of a resistive film sensor may correct sensor background drift. One approach is to provide two separate resistive arms within the same sensor apparatus, with one resistive arm serving as a reference resistor. The two resistive arms are subject to the same background drift to effectively subtract the common background drift while accentuating desired sensor signal from one of the two resistive arms that has exposure to the sensed environment, thus increasing the signal to background ratio without the need to take the sensor apparatus offline to perform a calibration. An example of this approach is described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,502,676, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The inventors of the present application have recognized and appreciated that a sensing element may be provided that has a single piece of resistive film with electrical contact made via multiple electrodes at a plurality of contact points on the resistive film. The resistive film has a plurality of regions defined between adjacent contact points, and the sensing element may be operated to accurately obtain resistance value of one or more regions of the resistive film by removing the contribution of contact resistance. One of the regions may have resistance changes that are representative of the sensed condition, while another one of the regions may be a reference resistor to calibrate or compensate for effects of background drift, without having to rely upon a reference resistor as a separate component. Thus a sensing element as described herein may be referred to as a self-calibrating, or self-compensating sensing element.
According to an aspect of the present application, accurate resistance measurement is achieved using a method to take multiple measurements through various combination of contact points pairs. In some embodiments, the method includes measuring a resistance value between pairs of electrodes selected from at least four electrodes of the plurality of electrodes, and based on the measured resistance values, calculating a calibrated resistance of the resistive film that is representative of a sensed condition.
The aspects and embodiments described above, as well as additional aspects and embodiments, are described further below. These aspects and/or embodiments may be used individually, all together, or in any combination of two or more, as the application is not limited in this respect.
Sensing element 100 includes a resistive film 110 and a plurality of electrodes 120 in contact with the resistive film 120. The plurality of electrodes 120 form a plurality of electrical breakout points disposed on sensing element 100 that interface with connector 18. Electrodes 120 may be formed by, for example deposition of strips of metal such as Au or Cu on the surface of resistive film 110. In some embodiments, the resistive film may comprise polymer nano composite (PNC), and may be referred to as a PNC film. In a non-limiting example, a PNC film may comprise carbon nanotubes (CNT). In an exemplary PNC film, the CNT may be evenly dispersed through a volume of polymer, disposed in a sheet or film, while other forms of mixing CNT in the PNC film may also be used.
As shown in
While not shown in
Sensor 10 may be powered and interrogated wirelessly and used to sense a structural health condition of a structure as part of a Wireless Integrity Sensing platform (WISP). An example of a WISP is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/268,437, filed on Feb. 5, 2019 and entitled “INTEGRATED RF POWERED PLATFORM FOR STRUCTURE HEALTH MONITORING (SHM) OF AIRCRAFT USING NANOSTRUCTURED SENSING MATERIAL,” and published as U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2020/0247562 A1, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Referring back to
The resistance values of a region may be defined and measured in any suitable ways. For example, a resistance value of region C may be a resistance in Ohms measured along the x-direction across the left extent and the right extent in between electrodes N and X. If the thickness and resistivity of resistive film 210 is substantially uniform across region C, then its resistance value may also be characterized using square resistance in Ohm/sq. Additionally, a calculated resistivity of region C may be used.
The inventors hare recognized and appreciated that when trying to measure resistance value of region C, a traditional approach of measuring the two-terminal resistance between electrode N and X in
In
A two-terminal resistance could be measured between any combination of two electrodes using any suitable measurement device, such as the measurement module 16 in
In the embodiment shown in
According to an aspect of the present application, a baseline resistance Ro for region C may be created by averaging and normalizing RB using Ro=RB×AF, where AF is an area factor or geometric factor representing the geometric ratio between region C and region B.
Further according to an aspect, the contact-resistance-independent resistance for region C may be obtained after taking four two-terminal resistance measurements and combine the results to eliminate contact resistances.
In the particular example shown in
According to an aspect of the present application, a baseline resistance Ro may be created by averaging and normalizing RB and RD using Ro=(RB+RD)×AF/2, where AF is an area factor or geometric factor representing the geometric ratio between region C and region B or D. For example, if B has twice the length as C in the x-direction, it is expected that the baseline resistance for C will be twice that of B, and the area factor will be 2.0 to convert RB into RC. If factors such as width, thickness, and/or resistivity are not identical for regions B and C, but ascertainable prior to the measurement, such factors may be determined during manufacturing of the sensing element and incorporated into AF as a scaling factor. Averaging two reference resistances RB and RD will reduce the effect of manufacturing variability of the PNC film across the x-direction, while no averaging or averaging of more than two reference resistances may also be used.
It should be appreciated that regions B and D need not be identical in size, and unique area factors AFB and AFD may be used for each to obtain the averaged and normalized baseline Ro=(RB×AFB+RD×AFD)/2.
In one non-limiting example, having obtained the baseline resistance Ro and the test resistance R for region C, a calibrated resistance may be obtained as R/Ro=2RC/AF×(RB+RD) in one example. In this example, the calibrated or compensated resistance is a scaled value, and will be 100% if R is identical to the baseline Ro. Any change in R due to sensed condition will cause R/Ro to vary to represent the change in sensed condition. On the other hand, any background drift in resistance will be identically canceled out in R and in Ro, and will not affect R/Ro.
The predicted crack length values in
where GF is the sensor geometry factor, and ΔR is the difference in measured resistance compared to baseline resistance, or change in resistance. This equation may be used to map ΔR/R from resistance to crack length. For Example, crack length
It should be appreciated that other forms of determining a and R may also be used. In some embodiments in which region C in
in which RC and RD are the contact-resistance-independent resistance of regions C and D, respectively, and RC0 and RD0 are the baseline resistance for the respective regions. Aspects of the present application may also be applied in other suitable forms to calculate the crack length parameter a based on R. For example, in some embodiments an equation for a is determined empirically. In some embodiments an equation for a comprises one or more polynomials of the normalized test resistance R. For example, empirical analysis of the crack length as a function of R may lead to identification of a polynomial relationship between the two. The identified relationship may be used in subsequent calculations of crack length as a function of R.
The illustrated aircraft 700 is an airplane in this non-limiting embodiment. However, other aircraft may use sensors of the types described herein, for structural health monitoring of the aircraft. For example, rockets, space shuttles, drones, gliders, satellites, or other aircraft may make use of the sensors and sensing techniques described herein. Thus, the nature of the aircraft is not limiting.
The sensors 702 may be nanostructure sensors. They may comprise smart sensing materials, such as a nanostructure sensing layer. The nanostructure sensing layer may include a nanostructure material such as carbon nanotubes (CNT). In some embodiments, the nanostructure sensing element may include CNTs embedded in a polymer matrix. The smart sensing material may change in response to a change in condition of the sensed structure, such as the aircraft.
The sensors 702 may sense conditions which represent a permanent change in state of the aircraft. For example, the sensors 702 may be corrosion sensors, configured to sense a state of corrosion of the aircraft. The sensors 702 may be fatigue crack sensors, configured to sense cracking of the aircraft. The aircraft 700 may have multiple types of sensors, such as corrosion sensors and fatigue crack sensors, or other sensors which may operate by experiencing a permanent change in state to mimic a change in state of the monitored aircraft.
The aircraft 700 may include any suitable number of sensors 702. In some embodiments, one or more sensors 702 may be included.
In addition to the foregoing, some novel aspects of the present application are summarized below.
In some embodiments, a sensor is provided that comprises a polymer nano composite (PNC) sensing element and more than two electrical breakout points. The sensor measurements are related to resistance changes of the PNC sensing element, and self-compensation is achieved by taking multiple measurements through various combination of electrical breakout points pairs to account for material and/or manufacturing variability and changes due to mechanical and/or environmental factors such as strain or temperature changes or aging.
In some embodiments, a non-conductive layer is disposed on the bottom surface of the sensor to provide improved electrical isolation from and improved adhesion to a host material or structure. In some embodiments, a non-conductive layer is disposed on the top surface of the sensor to provide improved electrical and contamination isolation from the surrounding environment.
In some embodiments, the resistance measurement is correlated to a physical property of the host material or structure. In some embodiments, the resistance measurement is correlated to the environment of the host material or structure. In some embodiments, the resistance measurement is correlated to the degree of damage, the extent of a flaw or remaining useful life (RUL) of the host material or structure. In some embodiments, the resistance measurement is correlated to the degree of exposure to a corrosive environment. In some embodiments, the resistance measurement is correlated to the length of a crack that has grown in a material.
In some embodiments, a self-compensating Polymer Nano Composite (PNC) sensing element is provided that comprises multiple contacts and multiple PNC regions. The multiple contacts and PNC regions are used to collect various combinations of resistance measurements for the purpose of self-compensation.
In some embodiments, the self-compensation is performed to account for manufacturing variability and changes due to mechanical and/or environmental factors. Such changes may be due to mechanical and/or environmental factors. Such changes may be due to mechanical and/or environmental factors such as any of temperature, strain and or aging.
In some embodiments, some of the PNC region are used to estimate the contact to PNC resistance and other for sensing. In some embodiments, the Polymer Nano Composite regions can be functionalized for different structure health monitoring (SHM) sensing tasks. In some embodiments, the sensing region can be Cu electroplated to create a witness corrosion sensing element. In some embodiments, the sensing region can be left raw or as an exposed PNC material to create a crack sensing element.
In some embodiments, a method for a self-compensating sensor is provided. The sensor comprises a polymer nano composite (PNC) sensing element and more than 2 electrical breakout points. The sensor measurements are related to resistance changes of the PNC sensing element, and by taking multiple measurements through various combination of electrical breakout point pairs a self-compensation can be achieved to account for material and/or manufacturing variability and changes due to mechanical and/or environmental factors such as strain or temperature changes or aging.
In some embodiments, the resistance measurement is correlated to a physical property of the host material or structure. The resistance measurement may be correlated to the degree of damage, the extent of a flaw or remaining useful life (RUL) of the host material or structure, or to the degree of exposure to a corrosive environment.
The terms “approximately” and “about” may be used to mean within ±20% of a target value in some embodiments, within ±10% of a target value in some embodiments, within ±5% of a target value in some embodiments, and yet within ±2% of a target value in some embodiments. The terms “approximately” and “about” may include the target value.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 63/038,551, filed on Jun. 12, 2020, and entitled “SELF-CALIBRATING POLYMER NANO COMPOSITE (PNC) SENSING ELEMENT,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with government support under Contract No. FA8649-20-9-9068 awarded by the U.S. Air Force. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4326164 | Victor | Apr 1982 | A |
5834942 | De Angelis | Nov 1998 | A |
6362632 | Livingston | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6975103 | Blom | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7244500 | Watts et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7286210 | Pettit | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7398184 | Chen | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7553341 | Pan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7781862 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7881679 | Faravash et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7940063 | Shimizu et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8133465 | Dai et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8271218 | Colinet et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8378757 | Shin et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8451124 | Lynch et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8552597 | Song et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8766775 | Farrell et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8787904 | Hayes et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8830037 | Burke | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8890547 | Maharyta et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9018616 | Hanein et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9091657 | Kessler et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9232475 | Heinzelman et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9256327 | Salaverry et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9268441 | Walsh et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9372209 | Iwamoto | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9429491 | Bemis et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9480163 | Kessler et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9582981 | Rokhsaz et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9600125 | Badaye et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9608698 | Sessink et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9721463 | Rowland et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9921705 | Shibata | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10062831 | Hasan et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10114987 | Nikunen et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10146360 | Vandermeijden et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10210445 | Nikunen et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10352726 | Gidd et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10429483 | Qu et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10502676 | Kessler et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10581176 | Puchades et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10831323 | Bohannon et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10939379 | Quinlan et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10944162 | Stein | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20020154029 | Watters et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040178806 | Foreman | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040239504 | Kalinin et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050140457 | Bellantoni | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149807 | Xu | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050183492 | Rao et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050269213 | Steimle et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050284232 | Rice | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060014155 | Hamers et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060162431 | Harris et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070096565 | Breed | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120572 | Chen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126553 | Park et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070159187 | Chen | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080135614 | Werner et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080202930 | Mett | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204275 | Wavering et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090039864 | Gordon | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090121872 | Lynch et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090126471 | Fay et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090157358 | Kim | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100008825 | Subramanyam | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100027596 | Bellaouar et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100097273 | Biris et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100161004 | Najafi et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100178543 | Gruner et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100201189 | Kirby et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100320569 | Narita | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001502 | Walker | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012723 | Adamson et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110101996 | Potyrailo | May 2011 | A1 |
20110240621 | Kessler et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110293218 | Pettit | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120038377 | Hamann et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120055810 | Zhou | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120240667 | Geneste et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120256492 | Song et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120286804 | Kato et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130104665 | Biris et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130210154 | Dieckhoff et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130230429 | Naishadham et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140126442 | Jafarian et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145826 | Conner | May 2014 | A1 |
20140184249 | Saafi et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140191768 | Engl | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140200538 | Euliano et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140254445 | Heinzelman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140266025 | Jakubowski | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150239708 | Palazzola | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150317896 | Planton et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150330212 | Sassi et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160007288 | Samardzija et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160033403 | Packirisamy et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160050757 | Diao et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160196455 | Gudan et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160238547 | Park et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160254844 | Hull et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160274001 | Parker et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160302264 | Kessler et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160337789 | Rokhsaz | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170019954 | Kessler et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170168021 | Van Tooren et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170230916 | Stein et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170237466 | Carr | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170331844 | Harrigan et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170358854 | Stein | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180003615 | Kessler et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180095001 | Sun et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180139698 | Quinlan et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180191451 | Lynch et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180246200 | Goossen et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190002120 | Vinson et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190112072 | Abe et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190113941 | Dubois et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190193371 | Shinozaki et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190243696 | Snyder | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190252919 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190294275 | Ko et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200014354 | Luk et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200016626 | Holmes | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200189229 | Palmer et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200235713 | Luk et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200241670 | Abu Saude et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200247562 | Stein | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200309674 | Wardle et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200321787 | Miller | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210013747 | Wang et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210083510 | Liu et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210153128 | Quinlan et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210314871 | Stein et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20220128609 | Stein et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 864 817 | Aug 2013 | CA |
102037480 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102612638 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102782625 | Oct 2016 | CN |
103294299 | Dec 2016 | CN |
107576690 | Jan 2018 | CN |
105934733 | Feb 2019 | CN |
1 968 429 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2 789 992 | Oct 2014 | EP |
2 985 925 | Feb 2016 | EP |
3 190 421 | Jul 2017 | EP |
6310011 | Apr 2018 | JP |
10-0839226 | Jun 2008 | KR |
WO 2001013087 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 2006137849 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2008125878 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2017214488 | Dec 2017 | WO |
WO 2010150009 | Dec 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 25, 2017 in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/036719. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 20, 2018 in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/036719. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 24, 2017 in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/040356. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 10, 2019 in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/040356. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 21, 2021 in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2021/025379. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Nov. 19, 2021 in connection with International Application No. PCT/US21/36993. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 4, 2022 in connection with International Application No. PCT/US21/36993. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Dec. 28, 2021 in connection with International Application No. PCT/US21/56630. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 4, 2022 in connection with International Application No. PCT/US21/56630. |
Kang et al., Structural Health Monitoring based on Electrical Impedance of a Carbon Nanotube Neuron. Key Engineering Materials. 2006;321-323:140-5. |
Kang, Carbon Nanotube Smart Materials. Thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati. 2005; 170 pages. |
Kessler, Structural Health Monitoring Capabilities. Metis Design Corporation. Powerpoint Presentation 2008, 42 pages. |
Lazaro et al., A Passive Harmonic Tagfor Humidity Sensing. International Journal of Antennas and Propogation. Jul. 23, 2014; 2014 (670345): 11 pages. |
Loh et al., Passive wireless sensing using SWNT-based multifunctional thin film patches. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics. 2008; 28:87-94. |
Lurz et al., Reader Architectures for Wireless Surface Acoustic Wave Sensors. Sensors. May 28, 2018; 18(1734):29 pages. |
Lynch et al., A Summary Review of Wireless Sensors and Sensor Networks for Structural Health Monitoring. The Shock and Vibration Digest. Mar. 2006;38(2):91-128. |
Mahbub et al., Electronic Sensor Interfaces With Wireless Telemetry. Intech. Advances in Bioengineering. 2015; Chapter 6:151-175. |
Oh et al., A 116n W Multi-Band Wake-Up Receiver with 31-bit Correlator and Interference Rejection. Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC), 2013 IEEE. 4 pages. |
Rinaldi et al., Corrosion Sensor Development for Condition-Based Maintenance of Aircraft. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2012; 2012:11 pages. Article IDS 684024. |
Roberts et al., A 236nW-56.5dBm-Sensitivity Bluetooth Low-Energy Wakeup Receiver with Energy Harvesting in 65nm CMOS. 2016 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers. 2016; pp. 450-451. |
Rocheleau et al., MEMS-Based Tunable Channel-Selecting Super-Regenerative RF Transceivers. Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center. University of California. Prepublication Data Sep. 2015; 2 pages. |
Sample et al., Design of an RFID-Based Battery-Free Programmable Sensing Platform. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. Nov. 2008;57(11):2608-15. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/511,065, filed Oct. 26, 2021, Stein. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/840,274, filed Apr. 3, 2020, Stein. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/158,733, filed Jan. 26, 2021, Quinlan. |
Chiodarelli et al., Measuring the Electrical Resistivity and Contact Resistance of Vertical Carbon Nanotube Bundles for Application as Interconnects. Nanotechnology. Jan. 17, 2011; 22:085302 (7 Pages). |
Lee et al., Formation of Low-Resistance Ohmic Contacts between Carbon Nanotube and Metal Electrodes by a Rapid Thermal Annealing Method. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. Jun. 1, 2000; 33:1953-1956. |
Van Den Heever et al., Tactile Sensing using Force Sensing Resistors and a Super-Resolution Algorithm, IEEE Sensors Journal. Jan. 1, 2009; 9(1): 29-35. |
Zhao et al., Decrease of Contact Resistance at the Interface of Carbon Nanotube/Electrode by Nanowelding. Electron. Mater. Lett. Oct. 12, 2016; 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 13, 2022 in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2021/025379. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 22, 2022 in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2021/036993. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210389265 A1 | Dec 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63038551 | Jun 2020 | US |