The field of this invention is packers and plugs for downhole use and more particularly elements that swell to seal with a backup feature to control extrusion.
Packers and plugs are used downhole to isolate zones and to seal off part of or entire wells. There are many styles of packers on the market. Some are inflatable and others are mechanically set with a setting tool that creates relative movement to compress a sealing element into contact with a surrounding tubular. Generally, the length of such elements is reduced as the diameter is increased. Pressure is continued from the setting tool so as to build in a pressure into the sealing element when it is in contact with the surrounding tubular.
More recently, packers have been used that employ elements that respond to the surrounding well fluids and swell to form a seal. Many different materials have been disclosed as capable of having this feature and some designs have gone further to prevent swelling until the packer is close to the position where it will be set. These designs were still limited to the amount of swelling from the sealing element as far as the developed contact pressure against the surrounding tubular or wellbore. The amount of contact pressure is a factor in the ability to control the level of differential pressure. In some designs there were also issues of extrusion of the sealing element in a longitudinal direction as it swelled radially but no solutions were offered. A fairly comprehensive summation of the swelling packer art appears below:
I. References Showing a Removable Cover Over a Swelling Sleeve
1) Application US 2004/0055760 A1
FIG. 2a shows a wrapping 110 over a swelling material 102. Paragraph 20 reveals the material 110 can be removed mechanically by cutting or chemically by dissolving or by using heat, time or stress or other ways known in the art. Barrier 110 is described in paragraph 21 as an isolation material until activation of the underlying material is desired. Mechanical expansion of the underlying pipe is also contemplated in a variety of techniques described in paragraph 24.
2) Application US 2004/0194971 A1
This reference discusses in paragraph 49 the use of water or alkali soluble polymeric covering so that the actuating agent can contact the elastomeric material lying below for the purpose of delaying swelling. One way to accomplish the delay is to require injection into the well of the material that will remove the covering. The delay in swelling gives time to position the tubular where needed before it is expanded. Multiple bands of swelling material are illustrated with the uppermost and lowermost acting as extrusion barriers.
3) Application US 2004/0118572 A1
In paragraph 37 of this reference it states that the protective layer 145 avoids premature swelling before the downhole destination is reached. The cover does not swell substantially when contacted by the activating agent but it is strong enough to resist tears or damage on delivery to the downhole location. When the downhole location is reached, pipe expansion breaks the covering 145 to expose swelling elastomers 140 to the activating agent. The protective layer can be Mylar or plastic.
4) U.S. Pat. No. 4,862,967
Here the packing element is an elastomer that is wrapped with an imperforate cover. The coating retards swelling until the packing element is actuated at which point the cover is “disrupted” and swelling of the underlying seal can begin in earnest, as reported in Column 7.
5) U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,522
This patent has many embodiments. The one in FIG. 26 is foam that is retained for run in and when the proper depth is reached expansion of the tubular breaks the retainer 272 to allow the foam to swell to its original dimension.
6) Application US 2004/0020662 A1
A permeable outer layer 10 covers the swelling layer 12 and has a higher resistance to swelling than the core swelling layer 12. Specific material choices are given in paragraphs 17 and 19. What happens to the cover 10 during swelling is not made clear but it presumably tears and fragments of it remain in the vicinity of the swelling seal.
7) U.S. Pat. No. 3,918,523
The swelling element is covered in treated burlap to delay swelling until the desired wellbore location is reached. The coating then dissolves of the burlap allowing fluid to go through the burlap to get to the swelling element 24 which expands and bursts the cover 20, as reported in the top of Column 8)
8) U.S. Pat. No. 4,612,985
A seal stack to be inserted in a seal bore of a downhole tool is covered by a sleeve shearably mounted to a mandrel. The sleeve is stopped ahead of the seal bore as the seal first become unconstrained just as they are advanced into the seal bore.
II. References Showing a Swelling Material under an Impervious Sleeve
1) Application US 2005/0110217
An inflatable packer is filled with material that swells when a swelling agent is introduced to it.
2) U.S. Pat. No. 6,073,692
A packer has a fluted mandrel and is covered by a sealing element. Hardening ingredients are kept apart from each other for run in. Thereafter, the mandrel is expanded to a circular cross section and the ingredients below the outer sleeve mix and harden. Swelling does not necessarily result.
3) U.S. Pat. No. 6,834,725
FIG. 3b shows a swelling component 230 under a sealing element 220 so that upon tubular expansion with swage 175 the plugs 210 are knocked off allowing activating fluid to reach the swelling material 230 under the cover of the sealing material 220.
4) U.S. Pat. No. 5,048,605
A water expandable material is wrapped in overlapping Kevlar sheets. Expansion from below partially unravels the Kevlar until it contacts the borehole wall.
5) U.S. Pat. No. 5,195,583
Clay is covered in rubber and a passage leading from the annular space allows well fluid behind the rubber to let the clay swell under the rubber.
6) Japan Application 07-334115
Water is stored adjacent a swelling material and is allowed to intermingle with the swelling material under a sheath 16.
III. References Which Show an Exposed Sealing Element that Swells on Insertion
1) U.S. Pat. No. 6,848,505
An exposed rubber sleeve swells when introduced downhole. The tubing or casing can also be expanded with a swage.
2) PCT Application WO 2004/018836 A1
A porous sleeve over a perforated pipe swells when introduced to well fluids. The base pipe is expanded downhole.
3) U.S. Pat. No. 4,137,970
A swelling material 16 around a pipe is introduced into the wellbore and swells to seal the wellbore.
4) US Application US 2004/0261990
Alternating exposed rings that respond to water or well fluids are provided for zone isolation regardless of whether the well is on production or is producing water.
5) Japan Application 03-166,459
A sandwich of slower swelling rings surrounds a faster swelling ring. The slower swelling ring swells in hours while the surrounding faster swelling rings do so in minutes.
6) Japan Application 10-235,996
Sequential swelling from rings below to rings above trapping water in between appears to be what happens from a hard to read literal English translation from Japanese.
7) U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,919,989 and 4,936,386
Bentonite clay rings are dropped downhole and swell to seal the annular space, in these two related patents.
8) US Application US 2005/009263 A1
Base pipe openings are plugged with a material that disintegrates under exposure to well fluids and temperatures and produces a product that removes filter cake from the screen.
9) U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,522
FIG. 10 of this patent has two materials that are allowed to mix because of tubular expansion between sealing elements that contain the combined chemicals until they set up.
10) US Application US 2005/0067170 A1
Shape memory foam is configured small for a run in dimension and then run in and allowed to assume its former shape using a temperature stimulus.
IV. Reference that Shows Power Assist Actuated Downhole to Set a Seal
1) U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,522
This patent employs downhole tubular expansion to release potential energy that sets a sleeve or inflates a bladder. It also combines setting a seal in part with tubular expansion and in part by rotation or by bringing slidably mounted elements toward each other. FIGS. 3, 4, 17-19, 21-25, 27 and 36-37 are illustrative of these general concepts.
The various concepts in U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,522 depend on tubular expansion to release a stored force which then sets a material to swelling. As noted in the FIG. 10 embodiment there are end seals that are driven into sealing mode by tubular expansion and keep the swelling material between them as a seal is formed triggered by the initial expansion of the tubular.
What has been lacking in the prior art is an effective extrusion barrier to address the issue when using a swelling sealing element. Those skilled in the art will appreciate the various solutions offered by the present invention to this issue from a review of the description of the preferred embodiments, the drawings and the claims that all appear below.
Preformed ribs are held closely to the swelling element and then are allowed to assume an expanded position to capture the ends of the swelling element. Many variations are possible one of which is retaining the ribs in a run in position with a band that releases by interaction with well fluid. In another embodiment the ribs are of a shape memory material and go to the enlarged state after a time and exposure to well fluids. The swelling action of the element could urge the ribs to the expanded position. Alternatively, a retractable sleeve can be actuated after a delay using a piston and a sealed compartment where a material must dissolve or otherwise go away before the piston can stroke to remove a retainer from ribs that can then move out.
Alternatively, the swelling of the seal 12 can snap a retaining ring, shown schematically as 16 to liberate the stored force in the ribs 14 to make them spring out. The ribs may be mounted in a cantilevered format having an end 18 affixed to a mounting block 20 supported by the mandrel 10. Ring 16 may be a sleeve that dissolves in well fluids. In the preferred embodiment the ribs 14 are deployed first before the swelling of the element 12 begins or at least before swelling of the element 12 brings it in contact with the ribs 14. Alternatively, the force generated by swelling of element 12 can be the mechanism for breaking a retainer such as 16. Alternatively, if the ribs are bistable, the swelling of the element 12 against the ribs 14 can trigger the outward movement of the ribs 14 as they assume rigidity in an enlarged diameter configuration.
The ribs 14 can be preferably overlapping or spaced apart, depending on the material selected for the element 12. The ribs enhance the ability of the element to withstand differential pressure as they obtain greater sealing contact in cased or open hole when greater differential pressures are applied.
The retainer band or sleeve 16 can be a combination of a polymer 17 and a metal that both dissolve or go away in series upon exposure to well fluids. The metal gives structural strength to hold the ribs 14 in the run in position while the polymer which is outside the metal acts as a time delay as it dissolves or goes away initially. After the polymer goes away the well fluids will attack the metal until the band or sleeve 16 fails thus allowing the ribs 14 to move out to the anti extrusion position where the element 12 is protected.
Another variation is illustrated in
In operation, the mandrel 10 is lowered to the location in the wellbore where the element 12 is to be set. As previously stated it is advantageous to let the ribs 14 assume their anti-extrusion position before the swelling of element 12 is initiated and certainly before such swelling is completed. In the
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention allows for a packer or plug to automatically actuate by being placed in position in the wellbore. When combined with a swelling element the invention provides an anti-extrusion system that itself is automatically triggered, preferably before any swelling but also possibly during swelling. Swelling can be the trigger to release the retainer for the ribs 14. The ribs enhance the ability of the element 12 to resist differential pressures while addressing the concerns regarding element extrusion. The ribs can be resilient so that they are retained for a small run in dimension and then allowed to spring out as the retainer is defeated. The retainer can be attacked by well fluids or removed by an applied physical force or even the onset of swelling of the element 12. The retainer can also be retractable, and one embodiment of such as design is illustrated in
The invention encompasses sealing elements that don't swell and that are mechanically driven to increase in diameter by longitudinal compression or by mandrel expansion or inflation, for example, and where the anti-extrusion ribs are present and separately actuated from the sealing element or actuated at the same time by the same or a different mechanism.
While the preferred embodiment has been set forth above, those skilled in art will appreciate that the scope of the invention is significantly broader and as outlined in the claims which appear below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2981333 | Montgomery et al. | Apr 1961 | A |
3918523 | Stuber | Nov 1975 | A |
4137970 | Laflin et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4424865 | Payton, Jr. | Jan 1984 | A |
4554973 | Shonrock et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4612985 | Rubbo et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4614346 | Ito | Sep 1986 | A |
RE32831 | Shonrock et al. | Jan 1989 | E |
4862967 | Harris | Sep 1989 | A |
4913232 | Cheymol et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4919989 | Colangelo | Apr 1990 | A |
4936386 | Colangelo | Jun 1990 | A |
5027894 | Coone et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5048605 | Toon et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5195583 | Toon et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5311938 | Hendrickson et al. | May 1994 | A |
6009951 | Coronado et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6073692 | Wood et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6581682 | Parent et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6834725 | Whanger et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6843315 | Coronado et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6848505 | Richard et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6854522 | Brezinski et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7216706 | Echols et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
20020070503 | Zimmerman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020195244 | Coronado et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040020662 | Freyer | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040055760 | Nguyen | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040118572 | Whanger et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040194971 | Thomson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040261990 | Bosma et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050067170 | Richard | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050092363 | Richard et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110217 | Wood et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050171248 | Li et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060219400 | Xu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060243457 | Kossa et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260820 | Whitsitt et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060272806 | Wilkie et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
04-363499 | Dec 1992 | JP |
09-151686 | Jun 1997 | JP |
2000-064764 | Feb 2000 | JP |
WO 2004018836 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070125532 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |