The present invention is a U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/DE2004/002283 filed Oct. 14, 2004 and claims priority of German Patent Application No. 203 15 935.7 filed Oct. 16, 2003.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to an electrostatic separator for separating particles containing oil out of a gas stream. The electrostatic separator includes an emission electrode and a deposition electrode, and the emission electrode has a front corona region extending into the gas stream and a rear deposition region.
2. Discussion of Background Information
Such electrostatic separators are known from the automotive field for separating oil from the gas stream of a crankcase ventilator in internal combustion engines.
During operation of the electrostatic separator, deposits can occur on the deposition electrode, which impermissibly reduce the spacing between the deposition electrode and the emission electrode. Proposals are known for cleaning deposits on electrostatic separators through the use of moving parts.
The invention improves an electrostatic separator of the generic type to prevent the formation of deposits on the deposition electrode with the most economical and operationally reliable elements possible.
According to the invention, an electrostatic separator includes an outlet opening for separated oil positioned to run along the deposition electrode. This outlet opening is provided at the level of, or behind, the deposition region of the emission electrode.
The electrostatic separator according to the invention continuously flushes the deposition electrode, specifically with the oil that has been separated from the gas stream or is yet to be removed from the electrostatic separator. The emission electrode is oriented with its corona region opposing the flow direction of the gas stream.
Designated within the framework of the present proposal as the corona region and, respectively, the deposition region, are one region each of the electrostatic separator in the flow direction of the gas stream. Located in the corona region is the portion of the emission electrode forming the corona, which charges or ionizes the particles, and where only a small fraction of the particles are already accumulated on the deposition electrode. The majority of the charged particles are accumulated on the deposition electrode in the adjacent deposition region.
Provided on the deposition electrode in this deposition region, or even further downstream in the direction of the gas stream, is an outlet opening through which the oil deposited on the deposition electrode can be drained.
Due to the proposed embodiment of the electrostatic separator, moving parts, which under certain circumstances may be prone to vibration, can be dispensed with.
In an exemplary embodiment, an inventive electrostatic separator can be provided with an upward-pointing corona region, hence be arranged within a downwardly-directed gas stream. In this case, the outlet opening for the oil is located correspondingly far down. The drainage of the oil at the deposition electrode is supported on the one hand by gravity and on the other hand by the gas stream. A reversal of direction of the air stream above the emission electrode effects a centrifugal-force-induced preliminary separation from the gas stream of the larger particles, in particular, which in this way arrive at the wall of the flow redirection chamber, where they can flow down to the deposition electrode.
Especially advantageously, such a chamber can be embodied as a cyclone so that this chamber can serve as a true coarse separator or preseparator, and further separate coarse separators can be dispensed with. As a result, the installation of the electrostatic separator alone can be sufficient to allow an adequate cleaning of the gas stream, so that the use of an electrostatic separator embodied in such a manner makes possible considerable savings both with regard to the assembly as well as with regard to the installation space required, and finally also with regard to the quantity of material required, as compared to the use of an electrostatic separator which serves solely as a fine separator and works together with a separate coarse separator additionally connected upstream.
In another exemplary embodiment, the electrostatic separator is arranged for use with upward-flowing gas stream, such that the corona region of the emission electrode points downward in orientation. The gas stream must have a sufficiently high flow velocity for as large a quantity as possible of the oil deposited on the deposition electrode to be transported upward, where it can reach the outlet opening in order to return to the rest of the oil circulation through a separate outlet line. Here, too, a chamber for flow redirection of the gas stream is provided above the emission electrode, wherein the outlet opening for the separated oil is arranged between this chamber and the deposition electrode. In this chamber, a baffle can advantageously be provided, which causes the redirection of the gas stream, thus improving the degree of separation.
Two exemplary embodiments of the invention are explained in detail below on the basis of the two purely diagrammatic drawings.
In
The gas stream (arrow 6′) is guided through the electrostatic separator 1 in that it first enters a chamber 7 through a gas inlet opening 6. The gas inlet opening 6 and the chamber 7 are designed and arranged such that a cyclone effect (see arrow 6″) results, whereby the coarser oil particles, in particular, are separated already in this chamber 7 onto the chamber walls thereof.
From the chamber 7, the wall transitions into the deposition electrode 3, so that the oil which was separated within the chamber 7 runs along the deposition electrode 3, wets it, and in this way prevents the formation of deposits on the deposition electrode 3.
As the gas stream continues, it reaches the corona region 4, where the particles remaining in the gas stream are charged. In this way, the charged particles move to, and are deposited onto, the deposition electrode 3. According to the exemplary embodiment, the deposits may particularly collect on the deposition electrode 3 in the section of the electrostatic separator 1 where the deposition region 5 of the emission electrode is located.
The entire volume of separated oil arrives at a collecting trough 8 at the bottom of the deposition electrode 3, where an outlet opening 9 is arranged to feed the oil back into the oil circulation.
In
Arranged in the chamber 7′ for redirection of the gas stream, which is provided above the emission electrode 2 in this exemplary embodiment as well, is a baffle 10, which effects the change in direction and, despite being called a “baffle,” is flow-optimized, since the gas stream is not directed against the baffle 10 for the separation of oil particles. Instead, the baffle 10 is intended to divert the gas stream and direct it against the walls of the chamber 7′ so that an additional after purification of the gas stream takes place here if needed.
The oil ascending along and being separated on the deposition electrode 3 arrives at a collecting trough 8′, which is provided between the chamber 7′ and the deposition electrode 3. The oil is conveyed by this collecting trough 8′ out of the electrostatic separator 1 through an outlet opening 9′ and, for example, returned to the remaining oil circulation.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
203 15 935 U | Oct 2003 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2004/002283 | 10/14/2004 | WO | 00 | 4/14/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/039779 | 5/6/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1309221 | Schmidt | Jul 1919 | A |
2192172 | Anderson | Mar 1940 | A |
2192249 | White | Mar 1940 | A |
3478494 | Lustenader et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3492790 | Ebert | Feb 1970 | A |
4352681 | Dietz | Oct 1982 | A |
4588423 | Gillingham et al. | May 1986 | A |
4597780 | Reif | Jul 1986 | A |
6071330 | Matsubara et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6582500 | Ohadi et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6635105 | Ahlborn et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19516817 | Jun 1996 | DE |
19704461 | May 1998 | DE |
0685635 | Dec 1995 | EP |
1073149 | Sep 1954 | FR |
2177625 | Jan 1987 | GB |
0204126 | Jan 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070056443 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |