The present invention relates to an antenna arrangement having the features of the first part of claim 1.
The invention also relates to a method for producing an antenna arrangement.
There is an increasing demand of wideband antennas in wireless communication devices, in order to allow communication in several frequency bands and for different systems. Ultra Wide Band (UWB) signals are generally defined as signals having a large relative bandwidth (bandwidth divided by carrier frequency) or a large absolute bandwidth. The expression UWB is particularly used for the frequency band 3.2-10.6 GHz, but also for other and wider frequency bands.
The use of wideband signals is associated with many positive aspects and advantages as for example described in “History and applications of UWB”, y M. Z. Win et. al, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 97, No. 2, p. 198-204, February 2009.
Another important aspect of the UWB-technology is that it is a low cost technology. Recent development of CMOS processors transmitting and receiving UWB-signals has opened up for a large field of different applications and they can be fabricated at a very low cost for UWB-signals without requiring any hardware for mixers, RF (Radio Frequency)-oscillators or PLLs (Phase Locked Loops).
UWB technology can be implemented in a wide range of areas, for different applications, such as for example short range communication (less than 10 m) with extremely high data rates (up to or above 500 Mbps), e.g. for wireless USB similar communication between components in entertainment systems such as DVD players, TV and similar; in sensor networks where low data rate communication is combined with precise ranging and geolocation, and radar systems with extremely high spatial resolution and obstacle penetration capabilities, and generally for wireless communication devices.
It is challenging to generate, transmit, receive and process UWB signals, since it requires the development of new techniques and arrangements within the fields of generation of signals, signal transmission, signal propagation, signal processing and system architectures.
Basically UWB antennas can be divided into four different categories. The first category comprises a so called scaled category, comprising bow-tie dipoles, see for example “A modified Bow-Tie antenna for improved pulse radiation”, by Lestari et. al, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 58, No. 7, pp. 2184-2192, July 2010, biconical dipoles as for example discussed in “Miniaturization of the biconical Antenna for ultra wideband applications” by A. K. Amert et. al, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 57, No. 12, pp. 3728-3735, December 2009.
The second category comprises so called self-complementary structures as e.g. described in “Self-complementary antennas” by Y. Mushiake, IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 23-29, December 1992. The third category comprises travelling wave structure antennas, e.g. the so called Vivaldi antenna which is a well known and widely used antenna, as e.g. discussed in “The Vivaldi aerial” by P. J. Gibson, Proc. 9th European Microwave conference, pp. 101-105, 1979. The fourth category comprises multiple resonance antennas like log-periodic dipole antenna arrays.
Antennas from the scaled category, the self-complementary category and the multiple reflection category comprise compact, low profile antennas with low gain, i.e. having wide and often more or less omni-directional far field patterns, whereas antennas of the travelling wave category, like the Vivaldi antennas, are directional.
The above-mentioned UWB antennas were mainly designed for use in normal Line-of-Sight (LOS) antenna systems with one port per polarization and a known direction of the single wave between the transmitting and receiving side of the communication system.
However, most environments have many objects (such as houses, trees, vehicles, humans) between the transmitting and receiving sides of the communication systems that cause reflections and scattering of the waves, resulting in a multiple of incoming waves on the receiving side. Interference between these waves causes large level variations known as fading of the received voltage (known as the channel) at the port of the receiving antenna. This fading can be counteracted in modern digital communication systems that make use of multiport antennas and support MIMO technology (multiple-input multiple-output). However, so far, there exists no wideband multiport antenna suitable for such MIMO communication systems.
Future wireless communication systems are supposed to comprise a large number of micro base stations with multiband multiport antennas enabling MIMO. Known solutions do not meet requirements as to compactness, angular coverage, radiation efficiency and polarization schemes, which all are critical issues for the performance of such systems. The radiation efficiency of a multiport antenna is reduced by ohmic losses and impedance mismatch like in single-port antennas, but also by mutual coupling between the antenna ports. Therefore, this mutual coupling should be low, but there is not known any compact multiport antenna with low mutual coupling between the ports.
The bow-tie antenna described in SE 535 251 is a single port directional UWB antenna and does not solve the problems referred to above.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an antenna arrangement through which one or more of the above mentioned problems can be solved. It is particularly an object to provide an antenna arrangement suitable for micro base stations for wireless communication through which multipath fading effects can be reduced. Particularly it is an object to provide an antenna arrangement which is easy and cheap to fabricate, most particularly an UWB multiport antenna for a MIMO system.
Another object is to provide an antenna arrangement, most particularly an UWB multiport antenna, which is suitable for use in measurement systems for wireless devices with or without MIMO capability, such as measurement systems based on reverberation chambers.
Therefore an arrangement as initially referred to is provided which has the characterizing features of claim 1.
Still further it is an object of the present invention to provide a method for fabrication of an antenna arrangement through which one or more of the above mentioned objects can be achieved. It is in particular an object to provide a method which is easy to carry out, which involves only low costs, which is reliable and repeatable. Therefore a method as initially referred to is provided.
Advantageous embodiments are given by the respective appended dependent claims.
Particularly a multiport antenna is provided for which the mutual coupling between the antenna ports is weak, so that the far field functions become almost orthogonal. According to the invention is particularly provided an UWB multiport antenna arrangement with a weak mutual coupling between the antenna ports ensuring far field functions that are orthogonal in some sense, such as in terms of polarization, direction or shape. With orthogonal is here meant that the inner products of the complex far field functions are low over the desired coverage of the antennas. Particularly, there is also provided an UWB antenna arrangement for measurement systems for wireless devices of wireless systems, with or without MIMO capability, which has multiple ports, with a weak coupling, particularly no coupling at all, or at least a coupling which is as low as possible between them and far field functions which are orthogonal. The invention is particularly advantageous for use in MIMO antenna systems for statistical multipath environments.
The invention will in the following be further described in a non-limiting manner, and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
In one advantageous embodiment the central portion comprises a circuit board with micro-strip conductors. The conductors 23, 24 of the arm sections 3, 4, which are bent backwards towards the center on the other, second, side of the central portion 5, are located on the first side 51 of the central portion and extend in substantially opposite directions towards outer side edges of the central portion. Ports 111-114, here comprising coaxial connectors, are attached to the side edges, for arm sections 2, 3 on one side edge and for arm sections 1, 4 on the opposite side edge.
The central portion 5 comprises a metal layer 9, on part of the surfaces of which dielectric layers forming printed circuit boards 91, 92 are disposed. The first arm sections 1, 2 are diametrically arranged with respect to one another and are bent backwards towards the openings arranged substantially at the center of the first side 51 of the central portion. The second arm sections 3, 4 are diametrically and symmetrically located with respect to one another and bent backwards towards the center of the second side of the central portion.
In this embodiment the first arm section 1 and the second arm section 3 are located side by side, but bent backwards onto opposite sides or surfaces of the central portion. Correspondingly the first arm section 2 and the second arm section 4 are located side by side and bent backwards onto opposite sides or surfaces of the central portion. In this manner a very weak coupling between the ports 31, 32, 33, 34 is obtained, which is extremely advantageous for MIMO systems. Hence, although the antenna elements formed by the respective arm sections and the central portion are located very close to one another, a very low correlation between the ports is obtained, in particular embodiments even below 0.1 over the range 0.4-16 GHz, which is an extremely good performance. Particularly due to the fact that the arrangement is mainly made by a metal piece, the ohmic losses will be very low.
From the side view of the antenna arrangement shown in
In the embodiment of
The antenna arrangement 30 shown in
Coaxial connectors 11B1, 11B2 for arm sections 1B, 2B are here provided on the first side 5B1, and coaxial connectors 13B, 13B for arm sections 3B, 4B are here provided on the second side 5B2. Different mounting elements 17B can be provided for in any appropriate manner in order to allow for easy and reliable mounting of the antenna arrangement wherever desired, for example on the top of a mast, at a micro base station etc. Fastening elements 15B are provided in a convenient manner for mounting circuit boards 16B1, 16B2.
In
Arrangements with two or more arm sections bent backwards onto the same side may conveniently be used for wall mounting as a wall antenna with approximately a hemi-spherical coverage.
The antenna arrangements 70A, 70B are arranged on each a separate central portion 5E1, 5E2, with dielectric layers 9E1, 9E2 disposed between respective conductors 2170 and the conducting material of central portions 5E1, 5E2. As in previously described embodiments common openings may be used instead of separate openings in the central portions. An antenna assembly may also comprise more than two antenna arrangements.
Another exemplary assembly 80 is schematically illustrated in
It should be clear that such assemblies can be varied in many different ways as discussed in earlier embodiments, e.g. as far as the shape and tapering of the arm sections are concerned, if a common or separate openings are used for the arm sections of an arrangement, the widths and shapes of conductors may be different, where the conductors are located may differ, and the types and arrangement of connectors, as well as the arrangement of the dielectric material on the central portion may be differently implemented. Also the shape of the central portion, although preferably being square shaped or rectangular, may be different and may also have any other shape, for example triangular or hexagonal etc.
The arm section 1K may alternatively be bent backwards and face anywhere along the edge opposite the transition region. The central portion may also have another shape and may be larger such that the end tip instead is directed towards any other region of the central portion. The arm section may also have any other shape as discussed with reference to embodiments with two or more arm sections.
With a three port bow-tie single polarized antenna 95 (i.e. an arrangement with three arms or bows) the coupling between arms may be even further reduced, or a low coupling between ports may be easier to achieve.
Thus, with three arms a particularly compact antenna with a low or substantially no coupling between ports can be provided, e.g. suitable for wall mounting.
It should be clear that the arrangements shown in
It is a particular advantage of the invention that antennas with multiple ports are provided which are suitable for MIMO systems, and which are highly uncoupled (such that variations on channels will be different, avoiding that all channels have a low level at the same time).
It is particularly an advantage that an antenna arrangement is provided which is easy to fabricate, mount and control, particularly an UWB-antenna (ultra-wideband).
It is also an advantage that a MIMO antenna which is very small can be made, in some embodiments it may have dimensions corresponding to a cube with an edge length smaller than one third of the lowest operating frequency. It is also an advantage that an antenna arrangement is provided which has a low correlation between different antenna ports when it is used in a statistical field environment with multiphath, e.g. as low as 0.1 over 0.4-16 GHz in an arrangement with four arm sections (antenna elements) although they are located very close to one another. Such a low correlation can be assured by designing the multi-port antenna for having low mutual coupling measured between its ports (i.e. S-parameters Smn, scattering parameters, smaller than typically −10 dB). It is also an advantage that a large angular coverage can be provided, by all ports together, for example 360° for some implementations, or that antenna elements easily and flexibly can be arranged so as to together provide a desired angular coverage when the received voltages on all ports are combined digitally by a so called MIMO algorithm. An example of such an algorithm is Maximum Ratio Combining (MRC).
The invention is not limited to the illustrated embodiments, but can be varied in a number of ways within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1251166 | Oct 2012 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2013/051130 | 9/30/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/062112 | 4/24/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2479337 | Fyler | Aug 1949 | A |
3015101 | Turner et al. | Dec 1961 | A |
5898405 | Iwasaki | Apr 1999 | A |
6466178 | Muterspaugh | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6590541 | Schultze | Jul 2003 | B1 |
7075484 | Sung | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7084830 | Suh | Aug 2006 | B1 |
20030025638 | Apostolos | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040169609 | Song et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050162332 | Schantz | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060055619 | Sarabandi | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20090046026 | Nakano | Feb 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1754284 | Mar 2006 | CN |
102005034966 | Mar 2007 | DE |
H07-46028 | Feb 1995 | JP |
2003-249818 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2011-030196 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2004077604 | Sep 2004 | NO |
535251 | May 2012 | SE |
1001072 | May 2012 | SE |
2010058942 | May 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Sweden Patent and Registration Office, Int'l Search Report in PCT/SE2013/051130, dated Jan. 10, 2014. |
A. Lestari et al., A Modified Bow-Tie Antenna for Improved Pulse Radiation, Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Jul. 2010, pp. 2184-2192, vol. 58, No. 7, IEEE. |
Y. Mushiake, A Report on Japanese Development of Antennas: From the Yagi-Uda Antenna to Self-Complementary Antennas, IEEE Antennas and Propagation, 2004-08, pp. 47-60, vol. 46, No. 4. |
P.J. Gibson, The Vivaldi Aerial, Proc. 9th Euro. Microwave Conf., Sep. 17, 1979, pp. 101-105. |
M.Z. Win et al., History and Applications of UWB, Proc. IEEE, 2009-02, pp. 198-204, vol. 97, No. 2. |
A.K. Amert et al., Miniaturization of the Biconical Antenna for Ultrawideband Applications, IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagation, 2009-12, pp. 3728-3735, vol. 57, No. 12. |
EPO, Supp. Euro. Search Report and Opinion, May 6, 2016, pp. 1-7. |
JPO, Office Action, Jul. 4, 2017. |
K. Sakaguchi, Curled Plate Antenna for UWB, Proc. 2005 IECE Comms. Soc'y Conf., Sep. 7, 2005, p. 156. |
State Intellectual Property Off. P.R. China, Second Office Action, Aug. 11, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150380826 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |