The invention relates to the field of electromagnetic actuators.
So-called self-holding magnets are generally known and commonly used (see e.g.: E. Kallenbach, R. Eick, P. Quendt, T. Ströhla, K. Feindt, M. Kallenbach: Elektromagnete (2008), Chapter 9.2 Polarisierte Magnete, p. 298).
These are permanently polarized electromagnets which can be switched off: By means of permanent magnets, self-holding magnets are able to stably hold a (magnetic) armature in at least one position, wherein, as required, a counter-excitation can be generated by means of a coil (“trigger coil”), which compensates the permanent-magnetically generated field to such an extent that the armature position no longer is stable. It is known to provide a magnetic shunt in self-holding magnets. With respect to the permanent-magnetically generated flux, the shunt is connected in parallel with the one or more working air gaps of the armature. With respect to the flux generated by the coil, however, they are connected in series. The shunt hence on the one hand reduces the electric power required for the compensation of the permanent-magnetically generated field; on the other hand, the one or more permanent magnets are protected against demagnetization. Self-holding magnets often are combined with springs and with the same form electrically triggerable spring accumulators. The spring hence acts on the armature, in order to open the one or more working air gaps. The self-holding magnet, however, is designed such that when the gap size falls below a certain minimum air gap, a residual air gap remains, which is able to hold the spring in the tensioned condition.
By energizing the trigger coil, a counter-excitation can be generated such that the magnetic holding force becomes smaller than the spring force and the armature starts to move, wherein the elastic energy previously stored in the spring can be utilized to perform work. Such “magnetic spring accumulators” are needed for example as trips, in particular fault current trips, in electric switching devices, for example in circuit breakers. What is also generally known is the use as fault current trip in fault current protective switches. In addition, they are used in locking units (“locking magnets”), wherein tensioning can be effected mechanically or also by inverse excitation of the magnet by means of the coil (excitation instead of counter-excitation such as on triggering). To facilitate magnetic tensioning, influencing of characteristics can be utilized, whereby with fully open working air gap far higher force constants can be obtained.
In battery-operated locking units a low triggering current is particularly desirable. The same applies for the trips of electric switching devices, namely in particular for fault current trips of low- and medium-voltage switching devices with their own power supply. Trips, above all fault current trips, furthermore should react as fast as possible, i.e. have short dead times. Of such trips it also must be requested that they can be designed such that an excessive counter-excitation does not inadvertently prevent or inadmissibly slow down triggering: An overcompensation of the permanent-magnetically generated field and hence of the associated holding force can result in the formation of a holding force due to the flux linked with the triggering current, so that the self-holding magnet is triggered with a delay or not at all. Triggering magnets so to speak must of course be quite insensitive to vibrations, inadvertent triggering as a result of shocks or other vibrations should be rendered extremely difficult, which is why the desired high electrical sensitivity—i.e. the desired low triggering currents and powers—cannot be realized easily, in that magnetic holding force and spring force are adapted to each other as closely as possible.
Hence, it is the object of the invention: A self-holding magnet with spring (“magnetic spring accumulator”) which as compared to known types has a particularly low electric triggering power. In addition, the magnetic spring accumulator should have the following features, as required:
The invention proceeds from a self-holding magnet with spring, wherein the self-holding magnet includes a stop for the armature as well as a magnetic shunt. In the tensioned condition, the armature of the self-holding magnet is permanent-magnetically held against the spring force, the working air gap (or the working air gaps, if an armature with several pole surfaces is used) is closed except for a residual (working) air gap given by the stop, wherein the frame of the self-holding magnet (as armature counterpart) itself can serve as stop, possibly with an anti-stick film or the like.
The shunt has a particularly low reluctance: According to the invention, the shunt is to be dimensioned such that its reluctance in the tensioned condition is of the same order of magnitude and possibly as large as the reluctance of the residual (working) air gap (or the sum of the reluctances of the residual working air gaps, if a series connection of several working air gaps is present; this is the case e.g. in pole plates in which two poles engage the same surface).
With respect to the permanent-magnetically generated flux, working air gap(s) and shut magnetically are connected in parallel. With respect to the flux to be generated by the coil, however, they are connected in series. The reluctance of the shunt, as already mentioned, is of the same order of magnitude as the reluctance of the residual (working) air gap and possibly as large as the same. Flux-carrying parasitic residual air gaps likewise are to be considered corresponding to their arrangement. In any case, an electric counter-excitation of the self-holding magnet leads to the fact that the flux density in the working air gap(s) is reduced, while the flux density in the shunt increases.
With respect to the flux-carrying cross-sections, the shunt partial circuit also can be designed such that as a result of magnetic saturation the reluctance of the iron circuit “seen” by the coil increases with increasing counter-excitation such that even a comparatively strong counter-excitation is not able to retain the armature against the spring force (since the flux density in the shunt increases with increasing counter-excitation). For this purpose, the shunt partial circuit can have a rather constant, smallest effective cross-section along a certain (minimum) length. The shunt can be defined geometrically; it can, however, also be formed of a soft magnetic material of comparatively low (macroscopic) permeability, in particular of a sinter material with distributed air gap, which can simplify the manufacture.
In contrast to known self-holding magnets, a self-holding magnet according to the invention also includes one or more of the following three positive feedback devices:
In conventional self-holding magnets with spring (“accumulator spring”) the stop can be regarded as rigid in good approximation. In these drives, the armature therefore only starts to move when as a result of the electric counter-excitation the magnetic holding force falls below the acting (detaching) spring force of the accumulator spring. This is not the case when the stop itself is capable of compression. However, in order to satisfy the requirement of small triggering powers with sufficient vibration resistance, the residual air gap produced by means of the stop should be small. Correspondingly, the resilient sop should have a suitable stiffness: On the one hand, the stop should be far stiffer than the “first” spring of the self-holding magnet (“accumulator spring”) serving the elastic energy storage. On the other hand, the resilient stop however should be far less stiff than a solid stop (of an iron material). For example, the stop can be 100 to 10.000 times as stiff as the “first” spring (accumulator spring). The stop by no means should have a linear characteristic, but for example can also be degressive and be constructed by means of bending springs, in particular by a disk spring. The resilient stop also can be pretensioned. Furthermore, the stop can be designed adjustable, for example with fine threads, so that its pretension and/or rest position can be adjusted, in order to adjust the trigger characteristic. In summary, the “first” spring (accumulator spring) and the “second” spring, namely the resilient stop, together form a combined spring with highly progressive characteristic based on their action on the armature. The resilient stop permits that already a very small counter-excitation results in a certain (small) movement of the armature. However, since according to the invention the shunt has a very small reluctance, very small deflections of the armature from its (closed, tensioned) stroke starting position already lead to the fact that the flux via the shunt considerably increases and the flux via the working air gap(s) noticeably decreases, wherein the associated magnetic holding force of course develops in proportion to the square of the flux density in the working air gap. The small deflection of the armature, which as a result of the resilient stop already is effected by a small counter-excitation, hence leads to a considerable reduction of the magnetic holding force at the armature as a result of the changing distribution of the flux between working air gap and shunt. As regards the design and adjustment of the resilient stop it should correspondingly be considered that a sufficient vibration resistance of the system is maintained (insensitivity to inadvertent triggering). To improve the insensitivity to inadvertent triggering operations due to vibrations or also due to counter-excitations induced by interference fields, an additional electric excitation can be employed. For this purpose, the trigger coil can be used and be energized against that direction which is needed for triggering. However, an additional winding can also be used.
2.1. Variable Shunt Through Execution as Reversing Stroke Magnet
The positive feedback according to the invention also can be effected by a variably designed shunt. This means that on detachment of the armature—i.e. while the working air gap still is in the order of magnitude of the residual air gap—a movement of the armature, which increases the working air gap, results in a reduction of the reluctance of the shunt. For this purpose, the invention can be designed as reversing stroke magnet, wherein an end face of the armature together with the frame forms the working air gap of the self-holding magnet. The opposite end of the armature can form the shunt, wherein the shunt is designed as armature-armature counterpart system which preferably is designed such that the highest “force constant” occurs at the beginning of the stroke (i.e. in that position in which the working air gap is closed except for a residual air gap; the “tensioned” position). In this embodiment of the invention, a permanent-magnetically generated magnetic flux consequently is supplied to the armature, which corresponding to the associated reluctances is distributed on working air gap (without influencing the characteristic) and shunt (with influence on the characteristic, in order to open the working air gap). The counter-excitation by means of the associated coil then effects an increase of the reluctance force acting on the armature at the shunt and a decrease of the reluctance force at the “holding surface”, i.e. at the working air gap. Shunt and accumulator spring exert a force on the armature in the same direction (to open the working air gap).
2.2. Useful Work Resulting from a Reduction of the Reluctance of the Variable Shunt by Means of a Second Armature
A reduction of the flux-carrying shunt air gap (decrease of its reluctance) also can be effected by means of a second armature (“shunt armature”). This armature is movably arranged such that it is able to close the anyway small shunt air gap except for a residual air gap. The reluctance force acting on the shunt armature can be transmitted to the armature via a mechanical or hydraulic device with or without transmission, in order to open the working air gap (the force on the “shunt armature” hence should act on the (working) armature of the self-holding magnet in the same direction as the force of the accumulator spring). For force transmission a simple tappet can be used. In the tensioned condition of the drive, the shunt armature is in a position in which the reluctance of the shunt possibly is equal to the series reluctance of the (working) air gap(s). When a counter-excitation now is generated, the force acting on the shunt armature increases and is transmitted to the (working) armature in direction of the (accumulator) spring force acting on the (working) armature, i.e. acts to release the same from its stroke starting position. The magnetic holding force so to speak is reduced by the counter-excitation. The movement of armature and shunt armature finally effects a decrease of the reluctance of the shunt and an increase of the reluctance of the working air gap.
The invention will be explained in detail below with reference to examples illustrated in the drawings. The representations are not necessarily true to scale and the invention is not only limited to the illustrated aspects. Rather, importance is placed on representing the principles underlying the invention. In the drawings:
In the Figures, identical reference numerals designate identical or similar components each with the same or a similar meaning.
The individual depicted components of the drive can be made of the following materials:
A coil body can be omitted, when e.g. the groove in which the coil lies has an insulating coating.
δ10 and δ11 are the (series-connected) working air gaps in the tensioned stroke starting position and therefore closed except for the (non-illustrated) residual air gaps. δ20 is the shunt air gap which is utilized by the shunt armature 21 to perform work. The inner frame part 31 is chamfered in the region of the working air gap δ10.
Mode of Operation:
In the illustrated stroke starting position (tensioned condition), the shunt air gap δ20 possibly has the same reluctance as the series connection δ10, δ11 (but a larger cross-section). From the point of view of the coil, this can lead to a polarized (sic!) magnetic circuit of low reluctance, which provides for large force constants (N/A). Via the carrier 20, the shunt armature 21 acts on the tappet 10 welded to the working armature and thus additionally helps to overcome the holding force, which is conveyed via δ10 and δ11, and to accelerate the working armature. As a result of the series connection (sic!) of δ10 and δ11, opening of these residual air gaps by a given (small) length approximately effects an increase of their series reluctance twice as high as would be the case with a simple (small) working air gap. The shunt armature 21 starts to move, so to speak, and helps to move the working armature not only by means of the carrier 20, but additionally withdraws flux from the working air gaps δ10, δ11, since a closing movement of the shunt armature leads to a reduction of the reluctance of the shunt and the same is connected in parallel with the working air gaps with respect to the permanent-magnetically generated flux. As mentioned, the (electric) sensitivity of this drive can be increased further, in that it is equipped with a resilient stop of suitable stiffness. This stop (not shown) for example can make use of a disk spring and act on the tappet 10. Pretensioning the disk spring or changing its rest position, wherein the fine adjustment can be effected by means of screws with fine threads, then provides for an adjustment of the electric sensitivity of the drive. It can be advantageous to connect the drive according to the invention in series with a diode and to connect a varistor in parallel with the drive, as during opening a voltage is induced in the coil which is opposite to the triggering voltage. Such external wiring can considerably shorten the triggering time. By using a resilient stop, triggering proceeds as follows:
Electric counter-excitation reduces the flux through working air gaps δ10, δ11 and increases the one through the shunt air gap δ20. Due to the resilient stop, a minimal energization already leads to a certain decompression. As a result of this decompression, δ10 and δ11 are increased, while δ20 decreases correspondingly (since the shunt armature 21, accelerated by reluctance force, follows the tappet 10). Because said air gaps all are small, this small deflection of the system—the decompression—leads to a markedly different distribution of the permanent-magnetically generated flux: The flux through the working air gaps δ10, δ11 decreases, the one through the shunt increases. The rapid increase of the force acting on the shunt armature 21 contributes to triggering of the self-holding magnet and because of the force additionally transmitted to the working armature 11 via carrier 20 and tappet 21 and the magnetic “short-circuiting” of the working air gaps δ10, δ11 also provides for a considerable shortening of the achievable actuating times, as in conventional self-holding magnets, in any case at low triggering powers, only small forces from the difference of the spring force and the reluctance force are available for the acceleration of the armature in the surroundings of the stroke starting position. In the exemplary embodiment on the other hand the reluctance force inhibiting the armature movement is short-circuited with the associated flux as a result of the movement of the shunt armature, while the working armature 11 is driven by the reluctance force acting on the shunt armature 21 in addition to the spring force.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2013 010 204 | Jun 2013 | DE | national |
10 2013 013 585 | Aug 2013 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/063042 | 6/20/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/202761 | 12/24/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2130870 | Boehne | Sep 1938 | A |
2278971 | Boehne | Apr 1942 | A |
2310138 | Whittaker | Feb 1943 | A |
2919324 | Schuessler | Dec 1959 | A |
3119940 | Pettit | Jan 1964 | A |
3371297 | Ridings | Feb 1968 | A |
3444490 | Krummel et al. | May 1969 | A |
3639871 | Trbovich | Feb 1972 | A |
3783423 | Mater | Jan 1974 | A |
3792390 | Boyd | Feb 1974 | A |
3886507 | Johnston | May 1975 | A |
4072918 | Read, Jr. | Feb 1978 | A |
4144514 | Rinde | Mar 1979 | A |
4157520 | Moates | Jun 1979 | A |
4191937 | Koehler | Mar 1980 | A |
4251789 | Russell | Feb 1981 | A |
4253493 | English | Mar 1981 | A |
4644311 | Guery | Feb 1987 | A |
4737750 | Prouty | Apr 1988 | A |
4761575 | Reder | Aug 1988 | A |
4774485 | Dietrich | Sep 1988 | A |
4829947 | Lequesne | May 1989 | A |
4847581 | Mohler | Jul 1989 | A |
4851801 | Engel | Jul 1989 | A |
4876521 | Boyd | Oct 1989 | A |
4954799 | Kumar | Sep 1990 | A |
5010911 | Grant | Apr 1991 | A |
5032812 | Banick | Jul 1991 | A |
5327112 | Rossetti | Jul 1994 | A |
5351934 | Jensen | Oct 1994 | A |
5387892 | Rossetti | Feb 1995 | A |
5452172 | Lane | Sep 1995 | A |
5959519 | Gobel | Sep 1999 | A |
6130594 | Morant et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6285270 | Lane et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6646529 | Kahnert | Nov 2003 | B1 |
7557681 | Whitaker | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7598830 | Bogdon | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7982567 | Cartier Millon | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8138863 | Tanaka | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8179217 | Kawaguchi | May 2012 | B2 |
8228149 | Puth | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8975992 | Bottcher | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20040066261 | Nishida | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20070200653 | Matsumoto | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20110248804 | Wygnanski | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120169441 | Kim | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120293287 | Lauraire | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130222083 | Gu | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140002218 | Bory et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20160125990 | Strigerwald | May 2016 | A1 |
20160172137 | Liang | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160268032 | Mecklenburg | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
943479 | May 1956 | DE |
102011014192 | Sep 2012 | DE |
765411 | Jan 1957 | GB |
9933078 | Jul 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160148769 A1 | May 2016 | US |