The present invention relates to a locking and unlocking assembly, where two bodies which are partially constrained with respect to one another will become fully constrained when an engagement pin is fully engaged with the first body and the second body, such that there is substantially no movement between the two bodies when the engagement pin is fully engaged; and where the first body and second body are allowed to move with respect to one another when the engagement pin is disengaged from at least one of the two bodies. More particularly, the present invention relates to a locking and unlocking assembly using an engagement pin that is easy to produce, assemble, and use.
Pull pin devices are known as a mechanism for locking two bodies together when the pull pin is extended, and for unlocking the two bodies when the pull pin is retracted. In a device of this type, the pull pin is constrained by a housing attached to a first body to move only in the axial direction. This pull pin is often spring-loaded to bias the pin in the extended position, where it extends into a hole or pocket in a second body, thereby positively locating the second body relative to the first body. When the pull pin is retracted from the hole or pocket in the second body, the second body is able to move relative to the first body. Often, the second body will have a plurality of holes or pockets, so that the second body can be positively located in any one of a plurality of set positions relative to the first body when the pull pin is extended, and can be moved between these set positions when the pull pin is retracted.
A typical use for a pull pin assembly is to adjust the height of one body relative to another. These devices are used quite heavily in the fitness industry. For instance, a padded seat used in a weight machine, such as a bicep curl machine, would typically be made adjustable to allow users of different heights to be seated at the correct height to allow them to interact with the weight machine in the proper ergonomic position. A typical seat height adjustment mechanism would have a padded seat attached to a telescopic tube mechanism, where a first, smaller diameter tube would be able to slide up and down inside a second, larger diameter tube. The first, smaller tube would typically have a plurality of holes punched or cut along its axis. The second, larger tube would have a pull pin assembly attached to it and be designed to have the pull pin aligned with the holes in the smaller tube. Whenever the pull pin would be retracted, the first, smaller tube would be able to slide up and down inside the second, larger tube, allowing the padded seat to be raised or lowered to the desired height. To lock the padded seat at a specific height, the pull pin would be extended into one of the plurality of holes in the smaller tube, thereby preventing the smaller tube from moving relative to the larger tube.
However, because this pull pin design requires certain manufacturing tolerances to ensure that all of the moving components can move smoothly with respect to one another (for instance, the pin has to be able to align with each of the plurality of holes; the holes need to be large enough in diameter to always accept the pull pin; the inner tube has to be smaller than the inner diameter of the larger tube to allow the smaller tube to slide within the larger tube, etc.) these tolerances will often add up to allow some motion between the multiple components, even when the pull-pin is engaged in the “locked” position. This relative motion in the nominally “locked” position will often impact the feel of the machine in an undesirable way (machine has unstable, sloppy, loose, or wobbly feel), and could even cause injury to a user in certain circumstances, if the supposedly “locked” mechanism were to shift or wobble at the wrong time. To reduce this undesirable relative motion in the nominally “locked” position often requires the application of very tight manufacturing tolerances, which can greatly increase the cost and complexity of the apparatus. Additionally, tight tolerances can often make the moving components more difficult to move, thereby increasing the difficulty of use.
Tapered pull pins have sometimes been used to remove some of the undesirable motion in the system. By using a pull pin having a tapered end slidingly engaged with a first body, and having a second body with one or more receiving holes that are smaller than the largest diameter of the of the tapered pin, the tapered pin can be inserted into any one of the holes to lock the two components together. The tapered pull pin acts just like a normal pull pin in that it allows the two bodies to move with respect to one another when the pull pin is disengaged, and it locks the two bodies together when the pull pin is engaged with the receiving hole in the second body.
However, the tapered end of the pull pin allows the tapered pull pin to fill up some of the hole clearance, thereby reducing some of the undesirable relative motion between the two bodies. The leading end of the tapered pull pin easily goes into the small receiving hole at first, but as the pull pin moves axially into the receiving hole, the tapered end of the pull pin causes the cross section at the entrance of the receiving hole to increase until it fills the receiving hole. Therefore, using a tapered pull pin can remove the clearance due to differences in the diameter of the receiving hole and the diameter of the tapered pull pin. However, this does not remove all of the undesirable relative motion between the two bodies. The tapered pull pin itself must be tightly constrained by the first body to minimize tilting or rocking of the pull pin, which would allow motion between the first and second bodies. The axis of the tapered pull pin must be tightly constrained to align with the location of the one or more receiving holes, because any misalignment could allow motion between the first and second bodies. The angle of the taper is important too, because a long taper angle will require a very long throw (large amount of axial travel of the pin to fully engage the receiving hole) while a short taper angle can allow the tapered pull pin to back out in the axial direction, allowing even more motion between the first and second bodies. Therefore, while a tapered pull pin can reduce some of the stack-up of tolerances that allow relative motion between the two bodies, it cannot eliminate all of the stack-up of tolerances that allow relative motion between the two bodies.
Clamping mechanisms, such as cam locks, have often been used to either augment or replace pull-pin mechanisms. The clamping mechanism is used to clamp the two bodies together to reduce any relative motion between the two clamped bodies. But these mechanisms are often more expensive, require additional components, and are often more difficult to use. Because clamping forces can be quite high, clamping mechanisms typically have force amplifying components (such as a lever on a cam lock) that allow a user to apply the needed clamping force required to prevent motion between two bodies. However, these force amplifying components also can make it difficult for a user to judge when then have reached the optimum clamping force. Applying too little force can make it appear that two objects are clamped together tightly, but then allow the two bodies to dangerously slip during later use. Applying too much force can cause damage to the components. Additionally, the large clamping forces in turn create large frictional forces, often making it difficult for a user to lock or unlock the clamped components. Again, the addition of these mechanisms can greatly increase the cost and complexity of the apparatus.
There remains a need for a locking and unlocking apparatus which will securely lock two bodies together such that there is relatively little relative motion between the two bodies when the locking mechanism is engaged, while still offering the ease of use, reliability, cost advantages, and reduced complexity of a lower tolerance device.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a locking and unlocking apparatus which substantially reduces or eliminates all relative motion or backlash of the locked components while being easy to use, cost effective to manufacture, uncomplicated and reliable.
The locking and unlocking apparatus of the present invention generally comprises a first body, a second body, and an engagement pin with beveled surfaces designed to be inserted between the two bodies. The first body has an engagement surface designed to mate with at least some of the beveled surfaces on the engagement pin. The second body is partially constrained relative to the first body, but has the ability to move in relation to the first body. The second body has a plurality of engagement surfaces arranged to substantially align with the engagement pin. The engagement pin has a longitudinal axis. When the engagement pin is retracted, the second body is able to move relative to the first body. As the engagement pin is extended in the axial direction, the beveled surfaces of the engagement pin come into contact with the engagement surface on the first body and one of the plurality of engagement surfaces on the second body, thereby wedging or locking the first body and the second body together. These engagement surfaces on the first and second bodies also serve to locate the engagement pin when in the fully locked position. By engaging the engagement pin with different engagement surfaces on the second body, the first body and the second body can be locked into a plurality of set positions.
In another version, the locking and unlocking apparatus comprises a frame, an engagement pin with beveled surfaces, a wedge block attached to the frame, and an engagement plate with a plurality of engagement surfaces. The engagement plate and frame are moveable with respect to one another. The wedge block has at least one inclined guide surface, and the engagement pin has one or more beveled surfaces slidingly engaged with the inclined guide surface of the wedge block. The engagement pin is axially movable along the guide surface such that the wedge block drives the engagement pin to move in a transverse direction as the engagement pin moves in the axial direction. The engagement plate has a plurality of engagement surfaces positioned to be substantially aligned with the engagement pin. The engagement plate is movable in relation to the frame when the engagement pin is retracted. The engagement plate can be locked into any one of a plurality of relative positions when the engagement pin is extended into one of the plurality of engagement surfaces, and the extended engagement pin tightly engages both the wedge block and one engagement surface on the engagement plate to substantially eliminate any relative motion between the engagement plate and the frame.
This summary is not meant to be exhaustive. Further features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description, accompanying drawings and appended claims.
a is a front view of a locking assembly according to a first embodiment of the present invention.
b is a side view of the locking assembly of
c is a perspective view of the locking assembly of
a is a front view of the locking assembly of
b is a side view of the locking assembly of
c is a perspective view of the locking assembly of
a is a front view of the locking assembly of
b is a side view of the locking assembly of
c is a perspective view of the locking assembly of
a is an end view of a showing one example of an engagement pin.
b is a side view of the engagement pin of
a is a top view of a wedge block.
b is a front view of the wedge block of
a is detail view of the locking mechanism utilized in the exercise apparatus of
b is a second detail view of the locking mechanism of
a is a partial front view of the locking assembly of
b is a front view of the engagement pin of
a is a front view of a locking assembly using pull pin.
b is a side view of the pull pin of
Referring now specifically to the figures, in which identical or similar parts are designated by the same reference numerals throughout, a detailed description of the present invention is given. It should be understood that the following detailed description relates to the best presently known embodiment of the invention. However, the present invention can assume numerous other embodiments, as will become apparent to those skilled in the art, without departing from the appended claims.
Referring to
The engagement pin 10 has one or more beveled surfaces 12, and the wedge block has one or more inclined guide surfaces 22 to interface with the beveled surfaces 12 of the engagement pin 10. As the engagement pin 10 travels in the axial direction, the inclined guide surfaces 22 of the wedge block 20 drive the engagement pin 10 in a transverse direction perpendicular to the axial direction.
When the engagement pin 10 is retracted in the axial direction so that it slides down the slope of the inclined guide surfaces 22, the engagement pin 10 moves away from the engagement plate 150. When the top surface of the engagement pin 10 does not contact any of the plurality of engagement surfaces 180 of the engagement plate 150, the first body 110 and the second body 120 are free to move with respect to one another.
When the engagement pin 10 is extended in the axial direction so that it is driven up the slope of the inclined guide surfaces 22, the engagement pin 10 moves upward toward the engagement plate 150. Even if there are large tolerances in the size and location of the engagement surfaces 180, the motion of the engagement pin 10 moving in the transverse direction perpendicular to the axial direction will close the gaps, allowing the engagement pin 10 to tightly wedge between the wedge block 20 and one particular engagement surface 180 on the engagement plate 150. When the top surface of the engagement pin 10 fully engages with the engagement surface 180, the first body 110 and the second body 120 are locked together, so that neither can move with respect to the other. Here, the engagement pin 10 is shown biased toward the extended position by a coil spring 40.
One major benefit of this design is that tight tolerances are not needed. Unlike a traditional pull pin mechanism, which requires a bushing or other tight housing around the pull pin to constrain it to move only in the axial direction, the present invention does not require tight tolerances, and actually works better when the engagement pin 10 can move in multiple directions (i.e. the engagement pin 10 needs to be able to move in the axial direction as well as at least one direction perpendicular to the axial direction). Also, the present invention is self locating. Therefore, not only will the engagement pin 10 close up relatively large gaps as it extends to fully engage the engagement plate 150, but the engagement pin 10 can be fairly drastically misaligned with the chosen engagement surface 180 while the engagement pin 10 is retracted, and yet it will still become fully aligned and tightly wedged into the proper location when the engagement pin is fully engaged.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
b show an exercise apparatus 900 utilizing the locking mechanism 200 disclosed in
The portion of the drive system 940 shown on the right includes the hand cranks 941, and this portion of the drive system 940 is rotatable around axis A2. This right portion includes a wedge block 20′, an engagement pin 10′, and a control lever 943 for retracting the engagement pin 10′. The engagement pin 10′ engages with one of a plurality of engagement surfaces on the engagement plate 250′ when the engagement pin 10′ is extended, thereby locking the right portion of the drive system 940 into a particular orientation, and preventing rotation of the right portion of the drive system around axis A2. When the control lever 943 is actuated, the engagement pin 10′ is retracted out of engagement with the engagement plate 250′, thereby allowing the right portion of the drive system 940 to rotate about axis A2.
It is worth noting that an exercise apparatus 900 such as is shown here will have many loads acting on it when a user is exercising by rotating the crank arms 941 around axis A1. Because these loads are changing direction all of the time during the exercise, these loads will tend to rock the drive system 940 back and forth around the pivot axis A2. Because of the large distance between the crank arms 941 and the adjustable pivot axis A2, any small displacements between the engagement pin 10′, the wedge block 20′, and the engagement plate 250′ will be amplified to become large displacements in the position of the crank arms 941. Therefore, it is important that the locking mechanism 200 used in an application such as this exercise apparatus 900 have substantially zero clearance between the various components when in the locked position. The present invention serves to fill this need.
Referring to
The pin housing 949 of
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The engagement holes 480 in the second body 440 must be size large enough to ensure that the pull pin 410 will always align with the engagement holes 480, and to ensure that the inner diameter of the engagement holes 480 will always be larger than the outer diameter of the pull pin 410. Due to a stack up of tolerances, this requires that the engagement holes 480 are always oversized. When the pull pin 410 is inserted into an oversized engagement hole 480, there will always be some clearance around the pull pin 410, so that there will always be some amount of relative motion between the first body 430 and the second body 440. Because of this, a standard pull pin locking assembly always forces one to choose between a relatively inexpensive mechanism which allows relative motion between the components that are supposedly “locked” together, or spending more and more money in an attempt to get tighter tolerances so that the relative motion between the components can be reduced to an acceptable level.
Referring to
While the present invention has been described in terms of certain preferred embodiments, one of ordinary skill in the art of the invention will recognize that additions, deletions, substitutions, modifications and improvements can be made while remaining within the scope and spirit of the invention as defined by the attached claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1989810 | Kregeloh | Feb 1935 | A |
2488305 | Manger et al. | Nov 1949 | A |
2855199 | Noland et al. | Oct 1958 | A |
3439672 | Fisher | Apr 1969 | A |
4529219 | Shamie | Jul 1985 | A |
4602890 | Duda | Jul 1986 | A |
4627616 | Kauffman | Dec 1986 | A |
4811945 | Disbrow et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5265969 | Chuang | Nov 1993 | A |
5277684 | Harris | Jan 1994 | A |
D357956 | Hughes | May 1995 | S |
5527249 | Harris | Jun 1996 | A |
5554085 | Dalebout | Sep 1996 | A |
5624353 | Naidus | Apr 1997 | A |
5658223 | Habing et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658227 | Stearns | Aug 1997 | A |
5762585 | Jones et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5816545 | Malizia | Oct 1998 | A |
6162153 | Perez et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6270446 | Abelbeck et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290630 | Boland | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6398445 | Matali Badia | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6688797 | Park et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6932749 | Barnes et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7377884 | Schopf | May 2008 | B2 |
7695411 | Pandozy | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20080096729 | Hsu | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20100194156 | Kim | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100244408 | Dean et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100331153 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |