The present invention generally relates to doctor blade assemblies which define an enclosed fluid reservoir for applying fluid to a rotating roller, and more particularly relates to a self-lubricating end seal used to seal the opposite ends of the fluid reservoir, the top and bottom of which are enclosed by a pair of doctor blades which engage with the roller.
Enclosed doctor blade assemblies are used extensively in machinery utilizing a rotating roller that picks up fluid from a reservoir and deposits the fluid onto another surface located opposite the doctor blade assembly. Examples of such machinery include rotary printing units such as flexographic printing machines. Such enclosed doctor blade assemblies can also be utilized for the application of varnish, adhesives and various specialty coatings, for example. In a flexographic printing station, the enclosed doctor blade assembly delivers ink to the surface of an engraved roller, often referred to as the anilox roll. The surface of the anilox roller contains engraved microscopic cells that carry and deliver a pre-determined quantity of ink to the surface of the printing plate.
The enclosed doctor blade assembly is intended to form an intimate seal with the surface of the anilox roller. The top and bottom, longitudinal surfaces of the assembly are sealed by means of two doctor blades. The doctor blades are mounted to the reservoir and positioned in parallel, spaced relation to each other and are directed at strategic angles to engage the free edges of the doctor blades with the surface of the anilox roller. The doctor blades extend the full length of the anilox roller. The function of each doctor blade is determined by the rotational direction of the anilox roller with one blade metering the ink or other fluid from the surface of the anilox roller while the other blade simply acts in an ink containment role, holding ink within the reservoir (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,125,341). In such enclosed doctor blade assemblies, the reservoir and doctor blades contain the fluid except at the opposite ends thereof which are open and must be closed with specially configured seals to completely enclose the reservoir and ensure the fluids (e.g., printing ink and cleaning solutions) do not unintentionally leak from the enclosed fluid reservoir. The part of the seal that faces the radial surface of the anilox roller comes into direct contact with the surface of the anilox roller when the enclosed doctor blade assembly is put into operation. The remaining surfaces of the seal are in contact with the inner surfaces of the two doctor blades and the frame forming the reservoir of the enclosed doctor blade assembly.
Traditional doctor blade assembly end seals are manufactured from compressible foam and rubber materials which are very susceptible to uncontrolled deformation and dislodgement from the ideal operating position relative to the surface of the anilox roller, particularly when exposed to changes in the internal operating pressure of the enclosed fluid reservoir during normal operation, as well as the inherent mechanical drag applied by the rotation of the anilox roller, especially at elevated press speeds. Once dislodged from the correct operating position the normal life expectancy of the seal is shortened considerably and ink leakage starts almost immediately. Even if such a seal is not completely dislodged from the fluid reservoir frame, even minor unintended deformation or seal movement within the frame immediately leads to premature wear and some degree of unwanted leaking of the ink or other fluid from within the enclosed ink reservoir. Press operators are then forced to stop the machine production to change/replace the worn or dislodged seals. There is also excessive cost associated with the wasted ink as well as additional cleaning of the machine and various press components that are exposed to the leaking ink.
The surface of the anilox roller is quite hard (e.g., 1250-1300 Hv (Vickers scale; equivalent to Shore C +70) and abrasive due to the fluid-holding cells engraved into it which act to coat fluid onto the roller surface as it rotates through the fluid reservoir. As such, the end seals are exposed to significant abrasive wear as the anilox roller rotates, particularly at very high speeds which result in a proportional increase in the COF (coefficient of friction) and mechanical stress applied to the seals. New servo-drive, gearless flexographic presses have dramatically increased the machine production speeds that can be obtained. As the rotational speed of the anilox roller is increased, there is a proportional decrease in the life-expectancy of the surface of the seals in contact with it. Thus, as machine speeds have continued to increase, the industry has seen the prior art seals wearing out or otherwise failing faster than ever before.
Besides being subjected to abrasive wear, the end seals are also exposed to various levels of hydraulic pressure applied by the reservoir fluids (e.g., the printing ink and cleaning solutions) that are pumped into and out of the reservoir during normal operation of the press. The wear rate of the surface of the seals in contact with the anilox roller is thus directionally proportional to the anilox roller surface abrasiveness, hydraulic pressure applied by the reservoir fluids, and the speed at which the anilox roller is turning (rpm's). This rapid wear of the seals results in a considerable decrease in productivity due to the press operator having to frequently stop the printing press to replace worn, dislodged or leaking end seals in each of the print stations. A typical gearless flexographic press will have between eight and ten print stations having a pair of seals in each. In addition, modern servo presses are typically equipped with an automatic wash-up feature that facilitates very quick transition to the next print job. During the switch from one print job to the next the automatic wash-up cycle is initiated and any ink that remains in the enclosed ink reservoir from the completed job is extracted using suction and then charged (pumped) with cleaning solution. This cleaning cycle exposes the seals to varying degrees of negative followed by positive hydraulic pressure as ink is removed and cleaning solution is pumped/sprayed through nozzles and circulated within the reservoir of the enclosed doctor blade assembly. During the ink extraction stage and delivery of cleaning solution to the enclosed ink reservoir, a significant change in the internal operating pressure of the ink reservoir occurs due to the suction required to remove the left-over ink as well as the cleaning solution once the cleaning cycle is complete. This change in internal pressure within the enclosed ink reservoir has been known to dislodge one or both the end seals from their ideal operating position, leaving the seals incorrectly oriented relative to the surface of the anilox roller. If the machine is then operated with the end seals in an incorrect orientation relative to the curved surface of the anilox roller, the end seal wears rapidly (similar to having unbalanced tires on a car) which, if not caught by the operator, results in a loss of intimate contact with the surface of the anilox roller which in turn allows ink to enter the area where the seal makes contact with the surface of the anilox roller. Once the printing ink enters this area (between the surface of the seal facing the roller and the anilox roller) the ink starts to dry which then adds to the rate of abrasive wear on the seal. Compounding the problem is that the new gearless press technology runs at 2-3 times the production speed of conventional gearless presses. As such, there is a significant increase in the level of mechanical stress applied to the end seals in the rotary direction where it makes contact with the surface of the anilox roller.
There thus remains a strong need in the industry for enclosed doctor blade end seals which are much more durable and failure resistant than the end seals which have been used to date.
The present invention addresses the above described problems with prior art end seals by providing, in a first aspect of the invention, an end seal for an enclosed doctor blade assembly with an improved geometry which inhibits seal failure due to unintended seal movement. The present invention addresses the problems of prior art end seals by providing, in another aspect of the invention, a self lubricating feature designed to decrease the rate of seal wear and improve the engagement of the seal with the roller surface. A pair of such seals are used to seal the opposite ends of the doctor blade assembly which includes an elongated reservoir frame having a channel (preferably, but not necessarily concave in cross-section) on one side for positioning in facing relation to an engraved anilox roller. The enclosed doctor blade assembly further includes first and second doctor blades affixed to and traversing the reservoir frame in parallel, spaced relation to each other on opposite sides of the reservoir channel. Each end of the enclosed doctor blade assembly is sealed with the inventive seal which forms a resilient barrier together with the reservoir channel and longitudinally extending edges of the doctor blades when engaged against the surface of the anilox roller in an operational position. The portion of each seal which faces and contacts the surface of the anilox roller defines a lubrication channel that is pre-packed with a viscous lubricant which creates a firm seal with the surface of the anilox roller. The lubrication channel provides a self-lubricating feature to facilitate extended life of the seal. The lubrication channel on the seal is unique as it contains and distributes anti-friction lubricant (lubricant is applied into the lubrication channel after the seal is manufactured using the injection molding process) which acts to extend the operational life of the seal. The lubrication channel is defined by two or more spaced, rigid sidewalls which come into contact with the surface of the anilox roller, as well as one or more but preferably three precisely oriented restrictor webs extending substantially perpendicular to the sidewalls. The three restrictor webs form four distinct lubrication compartments within the lubrication channel that ensures even distribution of the lubricant from top to bottom of the lubrication channel during normal operation of the machine (e.g., printing press) when the seals are in contact with the surface of the anilox roller. In addition, the three restrictor webs within the lubrication channel act to strengthen the two sidewalls which aids in discouraging unintended movement of the sidewalls when engaged against the surface of the anilox roller under load. The top surface of each sidewall that contacts the surface of the anilox roller is smooth and extends at an angle in a downwardly manner in a direction toward the center of the lubrication channel. The geometry and smooth surface on the top of the sidewalls also allows the lubrication channel to perform in the manner of a suction cup when engaged against the surface of the anilox roller under normal load.
Referring now to the drawing, there is seen in the various figures an embodiment of the inventive seal designated generally by the reference numeral 10. Seal 10 is preferably formed from a from a rigid yet resilient material (e.g., about 25-90 Durometer Shore A, more preferably about 60-80 Shore A, and yet more preferably about 70 Shore A) which may be injection molded from an appropriate material such as, for example, EPDM rubber, Buna-N rubber, Natural Rubber, or compounds having like characteristics, although other manufacturing processes are of course possible (e.g., cast molding, machining, SLA, etc.). In the presently preferred embodiment of an injection molded seal, as seen in
As seen in
Fluid coated onto the roller is transferred onto the object to be coated 24 (e.g., printing plate or transfer roller which in turn applies the ink to a web of material (not shown)) which is placed against a section of roller 22 which is annularly spaced from assembly 12, usually about 180° about the circumference of roller 22 from the doctor blade assembly 12.
To assist in proper installation of seals 10, 10′ into frame 14, a directional arrow 30 may be formed on seal rear wall 10e (
As is well understood by those skilled in the art, the force of engagement of the doctor blades against the roller may be adjusted to provide the desired amount of fluid metering onto roller 22. Of course if rotation of roller 22 is reversed in
As seen best in FIGS. 1A and 3-7, seals 10 and 10′ are configured to close off the opposite, open ends 14d and 14e, respectively, of frame 14 and doctor blades 18, 20. It is of course understood that second seal 10′ is essentially identical to first seal 10 and description of one herein applies to the other.
Seal 10, which is preferably formed as a unitary structure, may be considered in terms of a base structure 40 and integral upper structure 50. Base structure 40 is a substantially rectangular block of material having bottom wall 10e, opposite first and second end walls 10a, 10b, and opposite first and second side walls 10c, 10d. Base structure 40 is sized and shaped to fit very snugly within the open end or channel 14d defined by frame walls 14a, 14b and 14c with upper structure 50 extending outward beyond the confines of frame walls 14a, 14b and 14c. As explained in more detail below, upper structure 50 forms that part of seal 10 which engages with anilox roller 22 and also doctor blades 18, 20 and is of a much more complex geometry than base structure 40.
More particularly, as seen in
Upper side walls 56, 58 extend from a common center wall 60 which itself extends from and along the longitudinal center line CL of base structure 40 as seen best in the cross-sectional view of
The rigidity and geometry of the seal 10 with respect to the remainder of assembly 12 ensures that there is absolute minimal lateral (side to side) movement of the seal during normal operation of the roller machinery. When pressure changes occur while switching between printing and cleaning cycles, as well as the normal static hydraulic force the printing ink or other fluid applies to the seal 10 during normal operation, seal 10 maintains the optimum position relative to the surface of the anilox roller 22. Inhibiting or preventing such lateral movement is important in ensuring the lubricant 70 remains located within the lubrication channel 62 and is not sucked (negative pressure within the reservoir chamber 16) into the portion of the reservoir chamber 16 that contains the printing ink or other fluid (contamination of the ink and resultant negative printing issues) or forced out (positive pressure within the chamber 16) of the external side of the seal 10 where it can come in contact with other press components potentially damaging or causing them to fail.
The three restrictor webs 74a-74c further act to stabilize the two upper side walls 56,58. Restrictor webs 74a-74c hold the upper side walls 56,58 in a semi-fixed position, preventing excessive spreading thereof under load and unwanted release of lubricant 70 into the reservoir 16 or onto the press (or other machinery) components due to the normal static pressure applied by the ink or other fluid or when pressure changes occur within the reservoir 16 when switching between operational modes such as printing and cleaning cycles, for example.
The upper surfaces 56c, 58c of each upper side wall 56, 58 that in part define the lubrication channel 62 are substantially smooth, continuous surfaces, preferably about 0.010″-1.00″, and more preferably about 0.100″ in finished width. Each of these surfaces 56c, 58c are preferably formed at an angle “A” (
It is furthermore noted that as natural wear of the seal occurs during operation, the enclosed doctor blade assembly 12 is automatically advanced (biased) toward the surface of the anilox roller 22 to compensate for doctor blade and end seal wear. As the seal is brought closer to the surface of the anilox roller 22, the lubricant 70 in the four compartments 72a-72d within the lubrication channel 62 is consequently brought closer to the surface of the anilox roller 22 and distributed onto the two smooth surfaces 56c, 58c of the upper side walls 56, 58 as directed by the three restrictor webs 74a-74c and thereby keeping the smooth surfaces 56c, 58c lubricated and slowing the natural wear process of the seal 10.
As seen best in
As seen best in
The opposite end of the lubrication channel 62 supports the containment blade 18 on surface 52b and adjoining surfaces 56b, 58b. Three interference strips 53a′, 50b′ and 53b′ border these surfaces and are manufactured to the minimum effective thickness possible. The open side of surfaces 56a, 58a without an interference strip is not flush with the containment blade but recessed, stopping approximately 0.400″ prior to the point of where the containment blade is seated on the seal. With surfaces 56b, 58b side being slightly recessed from adjoining surface 52b whereon containment blade 18 seats, a certain amount of the lubricant 70 is able to penetrate under the containment blade 18 at the location of recessed surfaces 56b, 58b (the open gap “G2” wherein lubricant may flow indicated in
The bottom wall 10e of seal has a bevel 80 of approximately 45 degrees. Beveling the perimeter of the base portion 40 makes it easier to position the seal for quick and easy insertion into the frame 14 without disturbing the lubricant 70 from within the lubrication channel 62.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5012734 | Martin | May 1991 | A |
5125341 | Yaeso | Jun 1992 | A |
5150651 | Flores | Sep 1992 | A |
5410961 | DeNicola et al. | May 1995 | A |
6629496 | Boose et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6672207 | Kolbe et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6739248 | Kolbe et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
7597761 | Van Denend | Oct 2009 | B2 |
20030150342 | Kolbe et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20080034997 | Van Denend | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090193990 | Van Denend | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Mohamed-Karim, Hajji, “Extended European Search Report,” for European App. No. EP 11 17 9786, mailed Sep. 25, 2012, Munich, Germany. |
Tri-X Incorporated, screenshots from webpage http://www.inkmetering.com/, Aug. 31, 2011, Mar. 13, 2010, Tampa, Florida USA. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120049465 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61379158 | Sep 2010 | US |