The invention relates generally to a radio network, and more particularly to a radio network capable of detecting the occurrence of malfunction in one of its constituent two-way radios.
Radio networks are frequently deployed in commercial settings, such as retail stores, warehouses, or quick service restaurants. For example, a quick service restaurant may utilize a radio network to facilitate communication between a drive-through customer in a drive-through lane and an employee taking the customer's order. Such a radio network also permits the employees of the store to efficiently communicate with one another. In this context, the radio network is more commonly thought of as an “intercom system,” with the two-way radios often taking the form of headsets, in which the microphone, speaker, and transceiver are affixed to a unit worn upon the employee's head. For the most part, such a communication scheme provides a relatively inexpensive and reliable form of communication for the employees.
The above-described scheme does possess one shortcoming of note, however. In the event that one of the two-way radios (i.e., one of the headsets) malfunctions, employees tend to set the malfunctioning unit aside in favor of a properly functioning unit. Often times, no record is made of the fact that a particular unit has ceased to function. Over time, the number of cast-aside units grows, until the particular retail setting (e.g., quick service restaurant) suddenly and unexpectedly finds itself with an insufficient number of radios for proper operation of the store/restaurant. Then, only after being spurred on by a crisis, all of the malfunctioning units are serviced, and the store/restaurant is returned to operability.
As is made evident from the above discussion, there is a need for a scheme by which the silent and unobserved accumulation of malfunctioning radios may be avoided. A desirable scheme would require the deployment of little additional hardware, require minimal re-design of existing components of radio networks, and would be relatively inexpensive to deploy.
Against this backdrop, the present invention has been created. A method of identifying nonfunctional two-way radios from among a known group of two-way radios expected to be operating within a region may include establishing a corresponding window of time for each of the two-way radios expected to be operating within the region. For each of the established windows of time, a transmission from the corresponding radio is awaited. If, for a particular radio, no transmission is detected within its corresponding window of time, the absence of the transmission is recorded. Finally, if, for a particular radio, the number of times absence of transmission has been recorded exceeds a threshold, the particular radio is identified as nonfunctional.
According to another embodiment of the invention, a two-way radio may be improved so as to render its operability observable. Such a two-way radio may include an antenna for receiving and broadcasting transmissions. Additionally, it may include a transceiver unit coupled to the antenna. The transceiver unit modulates a carrier signal with a signal to be transmitted and recovers a baseband signal from a received transmission. The radio may also include a microprocessor coupled to the transceiver unit. The microprocessor is programmed to command a broadcast of a transmission containing a code identifying the radio, at a designated point in time. Prior to the broadcast of the transmission containing the identification code, a transmission protocol governing subsequent transmissions is known by the radio.
According to yet another embodiment of the invention, a wireless intercom system may include a first two-way radio fashioned as a headset. The system may also include a second two-way radio fashioned as a headset. Additionally, the system may include a repeater unit. Transmissions from the first and second two-way radio may occur upon a first carrier frequency. The first and second two-way radios may receive transmissions carried upon a second carrier frequency. The repeater unit may receive transmission carried upon the first carrier frequency, and may broadcast transmissions upon the second carrier frequency, thereby enabling the first and second two-way radios to communicate. The repeater unit may establish a first window of time corresponding to the first radio and a second window of time corresponding to the second radio. The repeater unit may await a transmission from the first radio during the first window of time, and may await a transmission from the second radio during the second window of time. The repeater unit may record absence of transmission from the first radio, if no transmission is received from the first radio during the first window of time. The repeater unit may record absence of transmission from the second radio, if no transmission is received from the second radio during the second window of time. The repeater unit may identify the first radio as nonfunctional if the number of times absence of transmission by the first radio has been recorded exceeds a threshold. Finally, the repeater unit may identify the second radio as nonfunctional if the number of times absence of transmission by the second radio has been recorded exceeds a threshold.
A radio network may be made to observe and record inactivity on the part of radios within the network. Employing the assumption that prolonged inactivity of a particular radio may indicate its nonfunctionality, the network may utilize a threshold, whereby a radio is deemed nonfunctional if it is inactive for a length of time exceeding the threshold.
Radio activity may be observed by a listening device. The listening device may establish a window of time during which it expects to receive a transmission from a particular radio. If the window of time elapses without the listening device receiving a transmission from the particular radio, the absence of such a transmission is recorded.
Subsequently, the listening device opens another window of time during which a transmission from the particular device is awaited. Once again, if the window of time elapses without a transmission from the particular radio, the omission is again recorded. If the number of recorded absences of transmission exceeds a threshold, the particular radio is declared nonfunctional.
Optionally, the listening device may be made to automatically contact a repair service, and schedule the nonfunctional radio for service. In another optional embodiment, the listening device may be made to receive alarm signals from auxiliary devices (such as an over-temperature sensor on a freezer). In response to an alarm signal from the auxiliary device, the listening device may contact an appropriate repair service.
The following disclosure describes the invention with reference to a radio network in which a plurality of two-way radios communicate with one another via a repeater. Each two-way radio broadcasts upon a first frequency using frequency modulation (FM) transmission; each radio receives FM transmissions carried on a second frequency. A repeater is used to receive transmissions carried on the first frequency and rebroadcast those transmissions on the second frequency. The radio communication is half-duplex, and no form of multiplexing is employed. Although the invention is described with reference to such a network, none of these features are critical to the invention. The invention is susceptible to deployment within a radio network employing any form of modulation and any form of multiplexing (including frequency domain multiplexing, time domain multiplexing, and code division multiple access). Additionally, the invention may be deployed in a network employing full or half duplex communication. The invention need not be embodied within the repeater.
The radio network 100 depicted in
Returning the discussion to
As can be seen from
When first installed, the base station 104 is idle with respect to its task of identifying nonfunctional two-way radios 102. This lack of activity is depicted by initial installation/idle state 400. When the base station 104 is first installed in a location, and occasionally thereafter, an initialization process can be used to store, in the memory 312 of the base station 104, a list of identification codes of the two-way radios 102 used with the base station 104. If a new radio 102 is added to the system, the initialization process may be carried out with respect to that new radio 102. Upon the occurrence of an initialization signal, the base station 104 transitions from the idle state 400 to an initialization state 402. The initialization signal maybe instigated by establishing an IR communication link between the base station 104 and a two-way radio 102 (via the IR interfaces 306 and 318), which is discussed in greater detail below. The initialization signal may also be instigated in many other ways, such as by establishing a cable connection between a two-way radio 102 and the base station 104. As described above, in this situation, the two-way radio 102 and base station 104 include a data port (such as a serial port), instead of an IR interface 306 and 318. One purpose of the initialization process is for the base station 104 to communicate basic information needed by the two-way radio 102 for it to conduct communication (e.g., the base station may communicate information regarding the specific frequency values, F1 and F2, used by the base station 104). Another purpose is for the two-way radio 102 to communicate its identity to the base station 104. The two-way radio 102 communicates its serial number and an identification code uniquely identifying the radio 102. In response, the base station 104 transitions to a list entry state 404, and enters the serial number into a list of radios 102 expected to be communicating with the base station 104. The list may be stored as a data array in the memory device 312 of the base station 104. The unique identification code is also entered into a list, and is associated with the serial number. Thereafter, the base station 104 transitions into a monitor state 406.
As will be discussed in greater detail below, execution of the monitor state 406 involves establishing a window of time for each radio 102 entered in the aforementioned list. During the window of time corresponding to a particular radio 102, the base station 104 expects to receive a transmission from that radio 102. Thus, throughout the time window, the base station 104 examines each transmission it receives, extracting an identification code embedded therein. If the identification code matches the one associated with the radio under test, the radio 102 is assumed to be functional, and the base station 104 remains in the monitor state 406. If, however, no such transmission is received, the base station 104 transitions into the record absence state 408. In the record absence state 408, a variable representing the radio's number of absent transmissions is incremented. If the aforementioned variable does not exceed a threshold, the base station 104 transitions back to the monitor state 406, and the base station 104 carries on its monitoring function. If, on the other hand, the variable exceeds the threshold, the base station 104 declares the radio nonfunctional, as shown in state 410. The base station 104 then returns to the monitor state 406, and resumes the monitoring function.
With respect to the state transition flow depicted in
After the close of the time window, it is determined whether a transmission had been received from the radio under test, as shown in operation 508. The return transmission from the radio 102 may contain the identification code as a sinusoid of a pre-defined frequency or as a pre-defined binary signal. If a transmission had been received, control returns to operation 500, and the monitoring loop continues. If no transmission had been received, control flows to operation 510, in which a variable representing the number of absent transmissions of the particular radio is incremented. Next, in operation 512, it is determined whether the aforementioned variable exceeds a threshold. If not, control returns to operation 500, and the monitoring loop continues. If so, the radio is declared nonfunctional, as shown in operation 514, and control returns to operation 500.
Thus, assuming each radio 102 is powered up at least once per day, a transmission from each radio 102 should be received during the time window.
The method of
With respect to the methods of
In response to the alarm signal from the auxiliary devices 900, or in response to having declared a particular radio 102 nonfunctional, the base station 104 may be programmed to execute the method depicted in FIG. 10. The method of
After receiving the information necessary for proper communication with the network, the radio 102 transfers to the base station information necessary for the base station 104 to monitor the functionality of the radio 102. Specifically, in operation 1104, the identification code that is to be embedded in transmissions from the radio 102 to the base station 104 is transferred to the base station. Next, in operation 1106, the serial number of the radio 102 is transferred to the base station 104. Finally, in operation 1108, the radio 102 is entered into a list of radios to be monitored. This occurs by entering the serial number and identification code of the radio 102 into data arrays stored in the memory device 312. The serial number and identification code are associated in such a manner that identification of one piece of information permits retrieval of the other. The initialization process typically is performed when a system is first installed, or when a new radio 102 is added to an existing system.
The various embodiments described above are provided by way of illustration only and should not be construed to limit the invention. Those skilled in the art will readily recognize various modifications and changes which may be made to the present invention without strictly following the exemplary embodiments and applications illustrated and described herein and without departing from the true spirit and scope of the present invention which is set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
299288 | Stewart | May 1884 | A |
303553 | Barnard | Aug 1884 | A |
1182896 | Davison | May 1916 | A |
1699127 | Wacker | Jan 1929 | A |
2486267 | Dullinsky | Oct 1949 | A |
3031537 | Rose | Apr 1962 | A |
3101155 | Lehr et al. | Aug 1963 | A |
3167619 | Palmaer | Jan 1965 | A |
3306991 | Wood | Feb 1967 | A |
3461463 | Beguin | Aug 1969 | A |
3769095 | Schmidt | Oct 1973 | A |
3906160 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3977907 | Roth et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4027113 | Matsumoto et al. | May 1977 | A |
4117203 | Sjogren | Sep 1978 | A |
4125681 | Sjogren | Nov 1978 | A |
4278852 | Gorike | Jul 1981 | A |
4323156 | Grueneberg | Apr 1982 | A |
D264961 | Oxenreider | Jun 1982 | S |
4409442 | Kamimura | Oct 1983 | A |
4431717 | Kikuchi | Feb 1984 | A |
4482745 | Maulding | Nov 1984 | A |
4484029 | Kenney | Nov 1984 | A |
4517413 | Pavitt | May 1985 | A |
4591661 | Benedetto et al. | May 1986 | A |
4741030 | Wilson | Apr 1988 | A |
D298029 | Foster | Oct 1988 | S |
4815143 | Derhaag | Mar 1989 | A |
4882745 | Silver | Nov 1989 | A |
4882770 | Miyahira | Nov 1989 | A |
4904549 | Goodwin et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4930148 | Lee | May 1990 | A |
4977610 | Kutz | Dec 1990 | A |
5027433 | Menadier et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5033094 | Hung | Jul 1991 | A |
D321500 | Fukuda | Nov 1991 | S |
D321680 | Blount et al. | Nov 1991 | S |
5113428 | Fitzgerald | May 1992 | A |
5117464 | Jones et al. | May 1992 | A |
5117465 | MacDonald | May 1992 | A |
5185807 | Bergin et al. | May 1992 | A |
5121243 | Miyahira | Jun 1992 | A |
5189400 | Schultz | Feb 1993 | A |
5203017 | Brooks | Apr 1993 | A |
5212020 | Inobe | May 1993 | A |
5220677 | Brooks | Jun 1993 | A |
5247380 | Lee et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253095 | Menadier | Oct 1993 | A |
D342947 | Totsuka | Jan 1994 | S |
5295191 | Van Vroenhoven | Mar 1994 | A |
5305132 | Fasen | Apr 1994 | A |
5321848 | Miyahira et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5333206 | Koss | Jul 1994 | A |
5347387 | Rice | Sep 1994 | A |
5402497 | Nishimoto et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5405716 | Yoshimatsu et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
D358126 | Sakuma et al. | May 1995 | S |
D364417 | Winston | Nov 1995 | S |
5491839 | Schotz | Feb 1996 | A |
5508123 | Fan | Apr 1996 | A |
5512891 | Kang | Apr 1996 | A |
5530763 | Aebi et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
D371784 | Gertz | Jul 1996 | S |
5548623 | Casper et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5590407 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590417 | Rydbeck | Dec 1996 | A |
D377477 | Harata et al. | Jan 1997 | S |
5608612 | Hokao | Mar 1997 | A |
5621384 | Crimmins et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5621662 | Humphries et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5644630 | Durco, Jr. | Jul 1997 | A |
5673036 | Gabrielle | Sep 1997 | A |
5060308 | Bieback | Oct 1997 | A |
D387328 | Ueda | Dec 1997 | S |
5701356 | Stanford | Dec 1997 | A |
5710979 | Tamai | Jan 1998 | A |
D390187 | Urvoy | Feb 1998 | S |
5721775 | Leifer | Feb 1998 | A |
D393624 | Shim | Apr 1998 | S |
D394436 | Hall et al. | May 1998 | S |
5784471 | Bebenroth | Jul 1998 | A |
5784685 | Stanford et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794127 | Lansang | Aug 1998 | A |
5798931 | Kaehler | Aug 1998 | A |
D399819 | Iida | Oct 1998 | S |
D400160 | Nagano | Oct 1998 | S |
5582300 | Addy et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825896 | Leedom | Oct 1998 | A |
5828300 | Addy et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
D400494 | Blase | Nov 1998 | S |
D400497 | Sabag et al. | Nov 1998 | S |
D400849 | Ikeda et al. | Nov 1998 | S |
D402955 | Smith et al. | Dec 1998 | S |
D403298 | Hall et al. | Dec 1998 | S |
D403299 | Smith et al. | Dec 1998 | S |
5869204 | Kottke et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881156 | Treni et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
D408351 | Shim | Apr 1999 | S |
5895728 | Walker et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
D409559 | Shim | May 1999 | S |
D409560 | Shim | May 1999 | S |
4754230 | Schwartz | Jun 1999 | A |
6003015 | Kang | Dec 1999 | A |
6004689 | Walker et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
D419131 | Andrews et al. | Jan 2000 | S |
6041243 | Davidson | Mar 2000 | A |
6430299 | Hall | Mar 2000 | B1 |
6054920 | Smith et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
D409975 | Zeller | May 2000 | S |
D432982 | Miyashita | Oct 2000 | S |
6130953 | Wilton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148175 | Freedland | Nov 2000 | A |
6157908 | O'Gwynn | Dec 2000 | A |
6175308 | Tallman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6230214 | Liukkonen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236732 | Griffin | May 2001 | B1 |
6236969 | Ruppert et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6252510 | Dungan | Jun 2001 | B1 |
D448340 | Hall et al. | Sep 2001 | S |
6300871 | Irwin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311071 | Voroba | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323785 | Nickell et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6406811 | Hall et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6426697 | Capowski et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6512832 | Braun et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522765 | Towle | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525854 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6754361 | Hall et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
20020076060 | Hall | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020132585 | Palmero et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020137466 | Bamburak et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030013503 | Menard et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030072358 | Gurney et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030092453 | Mills et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030134666 | Fletcher | Jun 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
244196 | Mar 1947 | CH |
19802659 | Jul 1999 | DE |
10024041 | Dec 2000 | DE |
20114127 | Nov 2001 | DE |
0019838 | May 1980 | EP |
0389174 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0676819 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0685894 | Dec 1995 | EP |
409283103 | Oct 1997 | JP |
1125017 | Sep 1999 | JP |
WO 8906075 | Jun 1989 | WO |
WO 9009726 | Aug 1990 | WO |
WO 9011657 | Oct 1990 | WO |
WO 9847311 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9960764 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0007176 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0178443 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0223932 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 03061147 | Jul 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030162504 A1 | Aug 2003 | US |