The present application relates generally to rail transportation systems, in particular to a self-propelled railcar.
A conventional train or “consist” (e.g., a set of railroad vehicles forming an entire train) typically includes a manned locomotive pulling a series of static railcars. This type of train model with manned locomotives requires an onboard crew to operate and monitor the train, which results in higher expenses. Additionally, having an onboard crew results in an increase in transportation time length. For long cross-country trips, the onboard crew needs to stop the train to rest when in principle the locomotive and railcars could continue the journey. This creates stoppages and slowdowns that could otherwise be prevented, which, in turn, adds to costs and delays.
In an effort to compensate for these higher operation costs, rail operators have increased the average number of static rail cars per train to spread the crew cost over more shipped freight; thus, increasing the train or consist lengths. The increase in train length results in an increase in train weight, which leads to longer stopping distances and slower starting speeds. In various conventional examples, a 100-car train may take well over a mile to stop and can only handle limited 1-3% grades without assistance from other locomotives or sanding systems to increase tractive effort on the driven wheels.
In view of the above, many rail operators have reduced labor and fuel burden per ton of cargo, which have led to larger rail yards for switching train cars and buildings. Rail yards facilitate the assembly of long trains as rail cars transporting cargo from multiple sources are queued and manually assembled through linkages. Such an assembly process is time consuming and prevents rail-based freight from competing with the speed of trucking shipments when specific delivery times are required. Furthermore, switching rail yards are limited in numbers and locations, thus increasing the variability in delivery times for rail-based freight. Moreover, the reconfiguration of trains and transfer of cargo from one train to another prevents visibility and accurate tracking of freight orders.
As shown above, there is an inverse relation between the cost per ton mile and the distance shipped. Over short distances, the cost to haul goods via train can be prohibitive, while over long distances the cost decreases. Small payloads on the scale of truck sizes are not economical for short haul train transit. Therefore, there is a need for an economical rail-based freight system to transport goods over both short and long distances.
A self-propelled railcar is disclosed according to an embodiment of the present invention. The self-propelled railcar comprises a structure; at least one bogie attached to the structure, a sensor suite; a propulsion motor; and an energy storage system. The at least one bogie comprises at least one powered axle. The sensor suite comprises a processor and a plurality of sensors. The energy storage system includes a controller and a power source, wherein the controller provides energy from the power source to the propulsion motor to the powered axle of the at least one bogie attached to the structure in a predetermined manner to control movement of the self-propelled railcar. In another embodiment, the energy storage system is located off-board.
In yet another embodiment, the self-propelled railcar comprises a structure; at least one bogie attached to the structure; a propulsion motor; a controller; a sensor suite; and an off-board energy storage system. The at least one bogie comprises at least one powered axle. The sensor suite comprises a processor and a plurality of sensors. The off-board energy storage system comprises a power source and the controller provides energy from the power source to the propulsion motor to the powered axle of the at least one bogie attached to the structure in a predetermined manner to control movement of the self-propelled railcar.
In yet another embodiment, the self-propelled railcar comprises a structure; at least one bogie attached to the structure, a sensor suite; a propulsion motor; an energy storage system; and an off-board energy storage system. The at least one bogie comprises at least one powered axle. The sensor suite comprises a processor and a plurality of sensors. The energy storage system includes a controller and a power source, wherein the controller provides energy from the power source to the propulsion motor to the powered axle in a predetermined manner to control movement of the self-propelled railcar. The off-board energy storage system includes a second controller and a second power source, wherein the second controller may, alternatively or additionally, provide energy from the second power source to the propulsion motor to the powered axle of the at least one bogie attached to the structure in a predetermined manner to control movement of the self-propelled railcar.
Further features of the inventive embodiments will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which the embodiments relate from reading the specification and claims with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
As illustrated in
In another embodiment, as illustrated in
In yet another embodiment, the self-propelled railcar 10 comprises a structure 12, at least one bogie 14 attached to the structure 12, said bogie having at least one powered axle 16, a propulsion motor 42, a sensor suite 18, a controller 26 and an off-board energy storage system 32. The sensor suite 18 comprises a processor 22 and a plurality of sensors 24. The off-board energy storage system 32 comprising a power source 28. The controller 26 provides energy from the power source 28 to the propulsion motor 42 to the at least one powered axle 16 in a predetermined manner to control movement of the self-propelled railcar 10.
In yet another embodiment, as illustrated in
In any of the above described embodiments, the currently disclosed self-propelled railcar may be used for different types of haulage operations. As illustrated in
As shown, the self-propelled railcar 10 includes at least one bogie 14 and a propulsion motor 42. The propulsion motor may be electrical or mechanical. At least one bogie 14 is attached to the structure 12 and has at least one powered axle 16. The energy storage system 20 or off-board energy storage system 32 provides energy to the propulsion motor, which then powers the at least one powered axle 16. As illustrated, the energy storage system 20 or off-board energy storage system 32 includes a controller 26 and a power source 28. The power source may include a battery, for example, lithium titanate oxide. The power source may further include directed energy, drivetrain, hydrogen drivetrain, hybrid generations, and large capacitors.
As illustrated in
The self-propelled car comprises a sensor suite 18. The sensor suite 18 comprises a processor 22 and a plurality of sensors 24. The plurality of sensors may include front and rear cameras, radar, lidar, global positional system (GPS) tracking, adaptive speed controllers, and ultrasonic obstacle detection. As illustrated in
Alternatively, or additionally, as shown in
The self-propelled railcar may further comprise a coupling assembly 34. As illustrated in
Coupling self-propelled rail cars provides for energy sharing between said railcars. Two or more self-propelled rail cars may be coupled together to share energy directly through an electrical connection. Alternatively, or additionally, two or more self-propelled rail cars may be coupled to share energy indirectly through shared kinetic energy and momentum. A self-propelled railcar may link to another self-propelled railcar while in transit sharing energy sources and coupling together to extend travel range. For example,
A self-propelled railcar may communicate and coordinate with other self-propelled railcars. The communication structure between railcars may be wireless communication strategy over, for example, Wi-Fi, 4G or 5G networks. Additionally, or alternatively, the communication structure between railcars may be hardwired communication on Ethernet or can-bus, for example. The railcars may communicate directly between each other in a decentralized fashion, as illustrated in
The off-board energy storage system may further comprise a vehicle 36 coupled to the structure 12. Said vehicle including at least one bogie 38 attached to the vehicle 36, the bogie having at least one powered axle 40, and a propulsion motor 44. Additionally, the off-board energy storage system may comprise a secondary power source 52. The controller 26 provides energy from the secondary power source 52 to the propulsion motor of the vehicle to the powered axle 40 of the at least one bogie 38 attached to the vehicle 36 in a predetermined manner to control movement of the vehicle. For example, the controller 26 may autonomously increase or decrease the energy provided from the secondary power source to the powered axle 40 to accelerate or decelerate the vehicle. In another example, the controller may control the energy provided from the secondary power source to the powered axle in accordance with the commands received from the remote source 30.
Having an off-board energy storage system provides numerous advantages over the current prior art. The off-board energy storage system provides for effective recharging and/or exchange of the power source reducing cycle time; therefore, decreasing fleet size and capital expenditure. The off-board energy storage system also provides for higher mechanical availability. As the power source of the off-board energy storage system, for example a battery, is depleted or expires, said power source may be replaced with a fully charged power source or a new power source without having to take the self-propelled railcar out of service. The self-propelled railcar may spend more time in motion and less time recharging the power source; thus, increasing the mechanical availability of the railcar. Moreover, the off-board energy storage system may also provide for a higher payload. Depending on the corresponding rail load limitations, the payload of a railcar is limited to 286K lbs or 315K lbs. By having an off-board energy storage system, the payload of the railcar is correspondingly increased by the weight of the off-board power source. A power source consisting of a battery may weigh 20K lbs. By having said battery off-board, the payload of the railcar may be increased by 10 tons.
As indicated above, the self-propelled railcar may communicate via wireless communication with the remote source and/or with another coupled or uncoupled self-propelled railcar. Additionally, different elements of the self-propelled railcar may communicate between each other via wireless communication. For example, the communication between the controller, the processor and/or sensor suite may be wireless. The controller of the self-propelled railcar communicates through a wireless adapter that translates the information into a radio frequency and transmits the same using an antenna. On the receiving end, a wireless router receives the signal and decodes the same sending the information to another computer, for example, to the processor, to the controller of another self-propelled railcar, or to the processor of the remote source. These can then use any existing standards (e.g. 802.11xx) for wireless communication or multiple standards in conjunction.
While this invention has been shown and described with respect to a detailed embodiment thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that changes in form and detail thereof may be made without departing from the scope of the claims of the invention.
The present patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/287,270 filed on Dec. 8, 2021, the entire contents is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63287270 | Dec 2021 | US |