Patent Grant
10926309
This invention generally relates to materials and methods for environmental remediation, including in particular, materials and methods for prolonging the lifespan of remedial reactive materials used in sediment capping systems.
Sediment capping remediation systems mitigate the migration of contaminants through sediments where they may negatively impact the quality of water and aquatic life which, in turn, may have significant adverse affects on human health. Through a variety of uptake mechanisms, contaminants may enter the base of the food chain, which has many implied ecological receptor and human health risks. Typical contaminants include both (1) organic pollutants (e.g., pesticides, insecticides, herbicides, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), chlorinated hydrocarbon compounds such as polychlorinated biphenyl (e.g., PCBs), tributyl-tin (TBT), dioxin, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), organic solvents, and/or non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPL); and (2) inorganic pollutants (e.g., heavy metals such a mercury and arsenic, ammonia, nitrates, and/or phosphates). The relative mobility and bioavailability of these contaminants can present ecological or human health hazards.
The specific sediment capping strategy that is ultimately deployed depends on many factors. Two generalized approaches are possible: (1) passive capping, which is the deployment of a barrier material that may be relatively impermeable to both the water above and the contaminants below, so as to sequester contaminants or at least diffuse them to reduce contaminant concentrations in pore water; and (2) active/reactive capping, which employs one or more additives or “amendments” to the barrier in an effort to bind up and/or destroy the contaminants. The choice of which approach depends on a wide variety of site-specific issues, demands and conditions.
Currently, at least two main active/reactive sediment capping systems are commercially available for sediment capping remediation: (1) the REACTIVE CORE MAT® sediment capping system commercially sold by CETCO and others; and (2) the AquaBlok®/AquaGate™ or Blended Barrier™/AquaGate™ (AB/AG or BB/AG) sediment capping systems commercially sold by AquaBlok, Ltd.
The REACTIVE CORE MAT® (RCM) is a generic treatment reagent delivery platform in the form of a permeable composite mat that is primarily composed of at least one reactive filler material sandwiched between two non-woven fabric geotextile materials and typically furnished in standard roll widths of 15 feet. Non-limiting examples of the reactive filler material include granular porous treatment reagents, activated carbon, apatite, organoclay, montmorillonite, and combinations thereof. An organoclay (OC) treatment reagent is frequently used as the reactive filler material and is reported to be effective at NAPL immobilization and reducing organic sheens while allowing the passage of water. Non-limiting examples of the geotextile materials include polypropylene (PP), high density polyethylene (HDPE), and combinations or copolymers thereof. An advantage of the RCM is that its porous nature allows for the dissipation of positive pore water pressures associated with upwelling groundwater over its entire surface, unless its ability to transmit water is reduced due to swelling/ingress of NAPL or due to clogging by fines or biofilms. An additional advantage of the RCM is that its thin, lightweight profile minimizes overburden pressures on soft underlying sediments while maximizing the available water column thickness in shallow waters, such as canals. Multiple RCM layers, of the same or different composition, can be positioned at or near the sediment surface to accommodate a variety of contaminant loading scenarios. The RCM may be used in combination with a protecting or “armoring” layer, such as a TRITON® marine mattress.
A TRITON® marine mattress (MM) system is traditionally composed of a planar rock-filled reinforced geogrid material. The TRITON® MM system can be lined with a geotextile fabric material and also filled with at least one reactive filler material. Non-limiting examples of the reinforced geogrid material and/or the geotextile fabric material include materials polypropylene (PP), high density polyethylene (HDPE), and combinations or copolymers thereof. Traditional designs of the Triton® MM system use natural quarried aggregates or natural river-rock of up to several inches in diameter, and it is understood that various industrial by-products, recycled and/or composite particles of similar size could be likewise incorporated. Non-limiting examples of the reactive filler material include granular materials (such as crushed apatite, limestone, slags, and crushed concrete, etc) and/or composite porous treatment reagents, activated carbon, apatite, organoclay, organoclay montmorillonite, and combinations thereof, either in bulk or as amendments to AquaBlok® or Blended Barrier™ materials. The TRITON® MM system can be used as a ballast layer and/or an armoring layer for armoring passive or active sediment caps and structures associated therewith. For example, a traditional rock-filled TRITON® MM system may be placed above a RCM, and optionally affixed thereto with fasteners, to serve as an armoring layer for protecting the RCM against damage and erosion.
The second type of active/reactive capping system—AquaBlok®/AquaGate™ or Blended Barrier™/AquaGate™ (AB/AG or BB/AG) are commercially sold by AquaBlok, Ltd. Briefly, these systems employ an aggregate core particle that is layered with the reactive amendment materials and deployed over the contaminated site. These particles are described in greater detail below.
One problem with active/reactive capping systems is their tendency to lose effectiveness over time, due essentially to saturation. Some treatment products reduce the bioavailability of toxic material by chemical fixation/complexation, some by sorption, both absorption and adsorption (e.g. activated carbon/organoclays or silt and clay soil particles, respectively), and some by a combination of sorption and chemical fixation (Sorbster™). The sorptive capacity is limited, however, based on the amount of reactive material applied and the finite number of sites available for sorbing and complexing. Once saturated, the reactive material no longer protects the environment from continued contaminant flux.
In a process known as “bioremediation,” certain toxins can be reduced by encouraging the microbial destruction or reduction of persistent, long-chain toxic organics by biodegradation wherein a microbe is introduced into the contaminated media to degrade the toxic organic compound. The “oil-eating” microbes used by the oil industry to clean up oils spills are examples. The microbes may be either naturally occurring or genetically engineered to be able to utilize the contaminant compounds as food sources. These microbes may be deployed either alone or in combination with other chemicals (such as hydrogen or oxygen) and/or micronutrients that can enhance targeted microbial activity.
Others (Alther-Biomin, U.S. Pat. No. 6,503,740 B1, issued Jan. 7, 2003) have demonstrated the ability to deliver microbes in combination with a sorbent treatment material (organoclay) wherein the organoclay product is inoculated with dormant microbes capable of breaking down complex chlorinated toxins such as dioxin and PCBs. However, the inability to deliver these materials to a sediment capping system through a column of water has limited the success of this approach.
The AB/AG and BB/AG systems typically contain at least two different sets of a plurality of composite particles having different properties, each composite particle comprising a core and a sealant layer at least partially encapsulating the core. For example, the AB (passive capping) layer 22 may comprise a set of a plurality of composite particles that form an impermeable barrier, while the AG layer 24 (whether with active treatment or simply drainage blanket) may comprise a different set of a plurality of composite particles that form a permeable and/or filtering layer. See, e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 6,386,796, which issued to Hull on May 14, 2002, U.S. Pat. No. 6,558,081, which issued to Hull on May 6, 2003, U.S. Pat. No. 7,011,766, which issued to Hull on Mar. 14, 2006, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,438,500, which issued to Hull on Oct. 21, 2008, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. These active (reactive) sediment capping systems are discussed in more detail herein.
Multiple successful environmental treatment products have been developed to capture environmental contaminants such as spilled hydrocarbons (such as petroleum, coal tar, PCBs) and dissolved phase metals (such as mercury) that are subject to methylation. The relative mobility and bioavailability of the contaminant can present ecological or human health hazards. Some treatment products reduce the bioavailability of toxic material by chemical fixation, some by sorption, both absorption and adsorption (e.g. activated carbon/organoclays or silt and clay soil particles, respectively), and some by a combination of sorption and chemical fixation (Sorbster™). The sorptive capacity is limited, based on the amount of active material applied and once saturated can no longer protect the environment from continued contaminant flux. Other means of reducing biotoxicity can be accomplished by encouraging the microbial destruction or reduction of persistent, long-chain toxic organics by biodegradation wherein a microbe either occurs naturally or a specially developed microbe is introduced into the contaminated media either alone or such as in combination with other chemicals (such as hydrogen or oxygen) or micronutrients that can enhance targeted microbial activity to more efficiently degrade the toxic organic compound.
Others (Alther- Biomin, see, e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 6,503,740) have demonstrated the ability to deliver microbes in combination with a sorbent treatment material (organoclay) wherein the organoclay product is inoculated with dormant microbes designed to breakdown complex contaminants such as dioxins.
The AquaBlok delivery technology has been used to successfully incorporate dormant microbes for successful delivery to contaminated sediments, and has been formulated with treatment amendments such as powdered activated carbon, organoclay and Sorbster to deliver such treatment amendments through a water column.
What would be advantageous is to combine the delivery of sorbent amendments (and micronutrients) coupled with appropriately selected dormant microbes so that while the sorbents begin to concentrate the contaminant, the microbes become active and consume the contaminant resulting in the generation of less toxic by-products that can be released into the environment through diffusion or ebullition.
The coupling of the materials can be accomplished by blending the microbes and sorptive material together in a manufactured particle or by manufacturing two (or more) separate particles—one containing sorbents and separate particles containing microbes and micronutrients or pH buffers, etc. necessary to achieve enhanced microbial activity. By balancing relative particle size and density using Stokes Law, the placement of a targeted layer of appropriately blended materials through a water column to provide a combination interim sorption active cap layer with long-term regenerative capacity through in-situ biodegradation to render captured contaminants less toxic and to restore the sorptive capacity of the treatment amendment, thus prolonging the life of the treatment system, reducing risk from long-term disturbance of the active in-situ system and potentially reducing the need for constructing a thicker treatment application, thus reducing the need for mitigation of floodway encroachment by preparatory dredging or other measures.
As used in this disclosure, certain acronyms and terms have the meanings ascribed below. The term “AB” means AquaBlok®, one example of an impermeable layer of a sediment capping system. The term “AG” means AquaGate™, one example of a permeable layer of a sediment capping system. The term “BB” means Blended Barrier™, which is a blend of an AquaBlok® impermeable barrier and aggregate rock.
The term “RCM” refers to a REACTIVE CORE MAT®, or a structural, hydraulic, and functional equivalent thereof. The term “MM” refers to a TRITON® marine mattress system, or a structural, hydraulic, and functional equivalent thereof.
The term “GG” means a geogrid and the term “NWGT” means a non-woven geotextile, as each of these is further described herein.
The term “GM” means a geomembrane. The term “GCL” means a geosynthetic clay liner. The term “GM-GCL” is understood in the context of this disclosure to mean a geomembrane-supported geosynthetic clay liner.
The term “daylighting” refers to the escape of upwelling groundwater and/or gasses (collectively “pore fluids”) to the overlying column or body of water. It will be understood that groundwater may carry with it dissolved contaminants and/or gasses, and is thus a “fluid,” and this fluid is filtered through porous media—whether naturally occurring or synthetic—and is thus characterized as a “pore fluid.” This is typically in the context of a sediment capping system that includes an impermeable barrier that directs the upwelling pore fluids to a non-contaminated area. Daylighting is depicted in
The terms “permeable” and “impermeable” are understood in the context of this disclosure to be with respect to conductivity of fluids; i.e. they refer, respectively, to the properties of materials that permit/block the flow of water, gasses and NAPLs therethrough. Permeability or “hydraulic conductivity” (K) is measured in rates of flow (e.g. cm/sec) as described below.
Where a closed or open-ended numerical range is described herein, all values and subranges within or encompassed by the numerical range are to be considered as being specifically included in and belonging to the original disclosure of the present application as if these values and subranges had been explicitly written out in their entirety. The upper and lower limits of all numerical ranges are deemed to be preceded by the modifier “about.”
All patent applications, patent application publications, patents, scientific and technological literature, publications and references specifically mentioned herein are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Composite Particles
The composite particles used in AB, AB/AG, or BB/AG sediment capping systems are known and described in the art along with various specific embodiments and/or sediment capping systems containing the same. See for reference U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,787, which issued to Nachtman et al. on Jul. 23, 1996, U.S. Pat. No. 5,897,946, which issued to Nachtman et al. on Apr. 27, 1999, U.S. Pat. No. 6,386,796, which issued to Hull on May 14, 2002, U.S. Pat. No. 6,558,081, which issued to Hull on May 6, 2003, U.S. Pat. No. 7,011,766, which issued to Hull on Mar. 14, 2006, U.S. Pat. No. 7,438,500, which issued to Hull on Oct. 21, 2008, and WO 2012/048215 published Apr. 12, 2012, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. The particles may have any desired particle diameter, non-limiting examples of which include composite particles having a particle diameter of less than ¾ inches (˜20 mm), including ¼-¾ inches (˜5 mm to ˜20 mm), and ¼-⅜ inches (˜5 mm to ˜10 mm).
The core of the composite particles may include a granular piece of stone, rock, gravel, sand, or slag, non-limiting examples of which include a granular piece of crushed limestone or other chemically/physically stable earthen aggregate. The core may have any desired particle diameter, a non-limiting example of which includes a particle diameter of ¼-⅜ inches (˜5 mm to ˜10 mm) The core may be more dense, less dense or equally as dense as the sealant layer. In an exemplary embodiment, the core has a relatively greater density as compared to that of the sealant layer.
The sealant layer of the composite particles may partially or completely encapsulate the core. The sealant layer may include at least one reactive material, non-limiting examples of which include a clay, a water absorbent clay that is readily hydratable and has a high swelling capacity (e.g., a bentonite clay, such as high quality Wyoming-derived sodium bentonite clay containing montmorillonite), an organoclay, a clay mineral (e.g., montmorillonite, illite, kaolinite, and attapulgite), a non-swelling reactive material (e.g., activated carbon), and combinations thereof. The reactive material may be powdered.
The reactive material of the composite particles may comprise activated carbons, or organoclays. Alternatively, the reactive material of the composite particles may comprise one or more proprietary products, non-limiting examples of which include Provect-IR™, a media treatment reagent available from Provectus Environmental Products, Inc. Freeport, Ill., USA, which is a metal remediation compound with a controlled-release feature of integrated carbon and zero-valent iron for in situ treatment and immobilization of soluble metals in groundwater and saturated soil, and/or MAR Systems' SORBSTER® media treatment reagent, which is a product containing aluminum oxide, silicon dioxide, iron oxide, ferric sulfate and iron sulfide, for removing metal contaminants, such as mercury, from water.
When composite particles having a sealant layer of water absorbent clay are exposed to water, the clay readily hydrates and swells to form a continuous seal or barrier layer having extremely low or no water permeability, which is effective for preventing migration, or avoiding leakage, of sediment, groundwater, gas, and/or contaminants there through. The seal or barrier layer may have any desired thickness, a non-limiting example of which includes a seal or barrier layer having a thickness of about 1 to about 4 inches (˜2.5 to 10 cm).
The composite particles may have any desired weight percent ratio of sealant layer to core, based on a total weight of the composite particles, non-limiting examples of which include:
The composite particles may have any desired dry bulk density, non-limiting examples of which include a dry bulk density of 70-90 lbs/ft3, (i.e. about 1121 to 1442 kg/m3) including 88-90 lbs/ft3 (i.e. about 1410 to 1442 kg/m3) consolidated, and 83-85 lbs/ft3 (i.e. about 1329 to 1362 kg/m3) unconsolidated. The composite particles may have a specific gravity of greater than 1.0.
The composite particles may, depending on use, have any desired water permeability or hydraulic conductivity, non-limiting examples of which include a water permeability or hydraulic conductivity (K) of 1×10−1 cm/sec or less, including 1×10−3 cm/sec or less, 1×10−4 cm/sec or less, 1×10−5 cm/sec or less, 1×10−6 cm/sec or less, 1×10−7 cm/sec or less, 1×10−8 cm/sec or less, 1×10−9 cm/sec, or having a conductivity in the range from 1×10−1 to 1×10−6 cm/sec, from 1×10−2 to 1×10−7 cm/sec, from 1×10−3 to 1×10−5 cm/sec, from 1×10−3 to 1×10−9 cm/sec, from 1×10−4 to 1×10−8 cm/sec, from 1×10−4 to 1×10−9 cm/sec from 1×10−5 to 1×10−9 cm/sec, and from 1×10−6 to 1×10−9 cm/sec.
The composite particles may further comprise one or more binders to promote adhesion of the sealant layer to the core. A non-limiting example of the binder includes a cellulosic polymer. The composite particles may further comprise one or more additional layers containing one or more desired materials and having any desired thickness.
The composite particles referenced and described above can of course be custom-formulated to meet unique site-specific demands for a particular project. For example, specific attention to design formulations may be necessary in order to create a long preferential flow path and/or provide sufficient contact and residence times to enable reactions (e.g., sorption, complexation, and/or precipitation) to occur to facilitate the capture and removal of contaminants from pore fluids, particularly when ebullition is the driver. Accordingly, the foregoing discussion regarding the composite particles is for illustrative purposes only and not intended to be limited to the specific aspects exemplified herein, but is to be accorded the broadest reasonable scope consistent with the general principles and features referenced and disclosed herein.
AB and BB composite particles may be characterized by a formulation that emphasizes a high swelling clay reactive material so as to create an extremely low permeability cap or impermeable cap with a hydraulic conductivity (K) of 1×10−7 cm/sec or less or 1×10−8 cm/sec or less, including from 1×10−7 to 1×10−9 cm/sec.
On the other hand, AG composite particles may be characterized by a formulation that comprises a core containing a granular piece of stone, rock, gravel, sand or slag that can be at least partially encapsulated within a non-swelling reactive material (e.g., powdered activated carbon, (a.k.a. PAC) to produce a porous or permeable treatment material (e.g., a porous or permeable treatment blanket, layer, wall, or similar structure) having a water permeability or hydraulic conductivity (K) of from about 1×10−2 to about 1×10−6 cm/s, depending on the particle size of the composite particle and the potential for swelling of the reactive material. Permeable composite particles may have permeabilities in sub-ranges within these permeability limits.
The sealant layer of the AG composite particles may comprise a hydratable and/or swellable reactive material (e.g., water absorbent clay) but only in minor amounts in order to avoid substantial swelling of the sealant layer upon exposure to water or moisture, so as not to interfere with and/or inhibit the flow of contaminated pore fluids therethrough.
For example, the AG composite particle may comprise 20 wt. % or less of a hydratable and/or swellable reactive material (e.g., water absorbent clay), based on a total weight of the AG composite particle, in order to avoid substantial swelling of the sealant layer upon exposure to water or moisture. Non-limiting examples of which include 20 wt. % or less, 19 wt. % or less, 18 wt. % or less, 17 wt. % or less, 16 wt. % or less, 15 wt. % or less, 14 wt. % or less, 13 wt. % or less, 12 wt. % or less, 11 wt. % or less, 10 wt. % or less, 9 wt. % or less, 8 wt. % or less, 7 wt. % or less, 6 wt. % or less, 5 wt. % or less, 4 wt. % or less, 3 wt. % or less, 2 wt. % or less, and 1 wt. % or less, of a hydratable and/or swellable reactive material (e.g., water absorbent clay), based on a total weight of the AG composite particle.
The dense, granular nature of the composite particles enables them to be easily and uniformly deployed and deposited through a water column (via Stoke's law) and onto the sediment surface using conventional materials handling equipment. Since a significant amount of water treatment occurs at or near the surface of the composite particle, inclusion of expensive reactive materials into a central core of the composite particle can be avoided.
AB composite particles may be used alone to form an AB passive impermeable capping layer or blended with other aggregate materials to form a BB capping layer. AG composite particles may be used alone to form an AG active/reactive treatment and permeable drainage blanket layer. AB and AG composite particles may be used together in an active/reactive sediment capping system, which may be arranged in an AB/AG layered “funnel and gate” fashion.
Self-Regenerating Reactive Materials
As noted above, the reactive materials may become saturated and their sorptive capacity exhausted. Certain microbes are known to utilize various contaminants as a food source. Examples of microbes for aerobic biodegradation of aromatic compounds include Burkholderia xenovorans LB400 and Rhodococcus sp. strain RHA1.
Examples of microbes for anaerobic biodegradation of pollutants include hydrocarbon-degrading and reductively dehalogenating bacteria discovered during the last decades, as well as the facultative denitrifying Aromatoleum aromaticum strain EbN1. Also relevant are microbes in the iron-reducing species Geobacter metallireducens (accession nr. NC_007517) and the perchlorate-reducing Dechloromonas aromatica (accession nr. NC_007298). Microbes especially useful for biodegradation of PCBs are the halorespirating Chloroflexi family, including the species Dehalococcoides and Dehalobim. Representative examples include Dehalococcoides sp. strain CBDB1, Dehalococcoides mccartyi strain 195 (formerly Dehalococcoides ethenogenes) and Dehalobium chlorocoerocia strains DF1 and o-17. For other contaminants, Desulfitobacterium hafniense strain Y51, and the Desulfitobacterium chlororespirans may be useful.
Further evidence of halorespirating organisms deactivating PCBs is found in Sowers, et al, In-situ Treatment of PCS by anaerobic microbial dechlorination in aquatic sediment: are we there yet?, Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2012, 24:1-7 (see table 1 in particular); and in Payne et al, Enhanced Reductive Dechlorinatiion of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Impacted Sediment by Bioaugmentation with s Dehalorespiring Bacterium, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2011, 45:8772-8779, both of which are incorporated by reference.
These microbes are capable of existing in a dormant state that allows them to be delivered to a sediment capping system. Although such organisms have been utilized with organoclays by Alther et al, the ability to incorporate them into composite particles like those sold by AquaBlok is new. In this way, one combines the delivery of sorbent amendments coupled with appropriately selected dormant microbes so that, while the sorbents begin to concentrate the contaminant, the microbes become active and consume the contaminant resulting in the generation of less toxic by-products that can be released into the environment through diffusion or ebullition. The microbes consume the contaminants as they are sorbed, thereby amounting to in-situ biodegradation to render captured contaminants less toxic and to restore the sorptive capacity of the treatment amendment, thus prolonging the lifespan of the treatment system.
The microbes may be incorporated into the same particles as a reactive material, or the reactive material may be incorporated into one type of particle, while the microbes are incorporated into a second type of particle. If desired, nutrients such as oxygen and carbon, and/or micronutrients such as vitamins, cofactors, etc, or buffers or other adjunctive materials may be incorporated into the composite particles, either with the dormant microbes or in auxiliary particles, to achieve enhanced microbial activity. In two particle-type systems, the placement of a targeted layer of appropriately blended materials through a water column to provide a combination interim sorption active cap layer is achieved by balancing relative particle size and density using Stokes Law. In some cases it may be desirable to lay down reactive material and/or nutrients/micronutrients simultaneously with microbes; and in other cases it may be desirable to lay down reactive material and/or nutrients/micronutrients in advance of the microbes. Other permutations and order combinations are possible, depending on the particular deployments situation and contaminants.
Selected Applications and Uses
The AB layer or cap 22 may have any desired thickness, a non-limiting example of which includes about 4 to about 12 inches. The AG layer 24 or drainage blanket may have any desired thickness, a non-limiting example of which includes about 1 inch or more. Of course, the aforementioned thicknesses may be optimized to a particular project having site-specific issues, demands and conditions.
An important feature of the AG layer 24, 88 is that it must be more permeable than both the underlying sediment 16 and the overlying AB and BB layer 22, 90 so that the AG layer creates a long preferential flow path 25 and/or provides sufficient contact and residence times to enable reactions (e.g., sorption, complexation, destruction, and/or precipitation) to occur to facilitate the capture and removal of contaminants from pore fluids (e.g. groundwater and/or gas).
As the contaminated pore fluid preferentially flows into and through the AG layer 24, 88, the contaminated pore fluid is actively treated until it daylights at the leftmost extent of the AG layer 24 and enters into the overlying water column 10 or surface water. The exposed section of the AG layer also facilitates the dissipation of positive pore water pressure associated with upwelling pore fluid.
Active/reactive sediment capping systems have been described above in connection with
As described herein, combinations of materials may be used in forming either of the two major layers of a capping system. For example, the BB layer of the BB/AG system is itself a blend of AB composite particles with aggregate. Other materials such as slag, clays, sand, mortars, binders, etc. might be used in combination with AB particles for the impermeable layer, which should have a hydraulic conductivity of 1×10−6 cm/sec or less, including 1×10−7 cm/sec or less, 1×10−8 cm/sec or less, and 1×10−9 cm/sec or less. Similarly, the permeable layer may itself be a combination of materials, such as composite particles in combination with aggregate, slag, sand and/or other drainage blankets or systems. The permeable layer should have a hydraulic conductivity of from about 1×10−1 cm/sec to about 1×10−6 cm/sec, including from 1×10−1 to 1×10−5 cm/sec, from 1×10−1 to 1×10−4 cm/sec, from 1×10−2 to 1×10−6 cm/sec, from 1×10−2 to 1×10−5 cm/sec, and from 1×10−2 to 1×10−4 cm/sec. The combination of different materials in the permeable layer can add variations that impact the degree of permeability as well as the distribution of any active reagents that might be warranted in a particular “active/reactive” capping installation.
The principle and mode of operation of this invention have been explained and illustrated with respect to various exemplary embodiments. Of course, this invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically explained and illustrated herein without departing from its spirit or scope. Accordingly, numerous modifications and variations on the present invention are obviously possible in light of the disclosure and thus the present invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Therefore, the foregoing disclosure is merely illustrative of various exemplary aspects of the present invention and numerous modifications and variations can be readily made by skilled artisans that fall within the scope of the accompanying disclosure.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2015/037386 | 6/24/2015 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2016/014199 | 1/28/2016 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5538787 | Nachtman | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5897946 | Nachtman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 6386796 | Hull | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6423533 | Gearheart et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6503740 | Alther | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6558081 | Hull | May 2003 | B2 |
| 7011766 | Hull | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7129388 | Scalzi et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7438500 | Hull | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7531709 | Scalzi et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7828974 | Scalzi | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 8147694 | Scalzi et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8673606 | Menashe | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 20020150429 | Hull | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20050005869 | Fritter | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20070113756 | Hull | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070297858 | Imbrie | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20100232883 | Hoag | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110044761 | Chang | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20140030797 | Scalzi | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20150266069 | Trauger | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 9501230 | Jan 1995 | WO |
| 2005042406 | May 2005 | WO |
| 2012048215 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| 2013192153 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| http://www.nationalslag.org/benefits-slag-products. (Year: 2013). |
| http://www.nationalslag.org/common-uses-slag. (Year: 2013). |
| Payne et al., “Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Impacted Sediment by Bioaugmentation with a Dehalorespiring Bacterium”, Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, vol. 45, pp. 8772-8779. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application PCT/US2015/037386, dated Sep. 11, 2015. |
| Sowers et al., “In situ treatment of PCBs by anaerobic microbial dechlorination in aquatic sediment: are we there yet?”, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2012, vol. 24, pp. 1-7. |
| Extended European Search Report, Application No. 15825496.1, dated Apr. 11, 2018. |
| European Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 15825496.1, dated Mar. 16, 2020. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170203346 A1 | Jul 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62027356 | Jul 2014 | US |
