1. Field
The disclosed subject matter is in the field of power amplifiers and, more particularly, power amplifier biasing circuits.
2. Related Art
Power amplifiers are commonly used in radio frequency (RF) circuits. Power amplifiers may employ power supplies that are either regulated or unregulated. The regulation circuitry in regulated power supplies increases the cost of regulated power supplies. Power amplifiers that rely on unregulated power supplies, on the other hand, are generally more susceptible to variations in the supplied power.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and is not limited by the accompanying figures, in which like reference numerals indicate similar elements. Elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale.
Referring to
RF circuit 100 as depicted in
Referring to
Biasing circuit 150 as depicted in
PA 310 as shown in
VCC 321 may be described herein as an unregulated signal to emphasize the lack of a conventional voltage regulator in RF circuit 300 and to emphasize further that VCC 321 includes a nominal component and a time-varying component, sometimes referred to herein as a variance component, that may be significant. In the case of a DC power supply 320, the nominal component of VCC 321 has a constant value. In some cases, the variance component of VCC 321 may have a magnitude that is 15% or more of the nominal component.
Turning now to
Input resistor RIN 342 is connected between SRBC 340 and control terminal 345 of RF power transistor 344. RF power transistor 344 is the transistor for which the quiescent biasing conditions are to be established. As such, RF power transistor 344 is sometimes referred to herein as the biased transistor. Depending upon the context, input resistor RIN 342 may be described as being a part of SRBC 340 or as part of the circuit-to-be-biased, which includes RF power transistor 344. RF power transistor 344 may server as the input stage of the PA 310.
In the depicted embodiment, SRBC 340 determines the quiescent condition for RF power transistor 310. As shown in
In embodiments that employ a type of bipolar RF power transistor 344, the quiescent conditions may include IQ 341, which represents the base current for RF power transistor 344 and ICC1346, the collector current for RF power transistor 344. Assuming that power supply 320 is able to produce a value of VCC 321 that is sufficiently high to maintain RF power transistor 344 in saturation, IQ 341 will remain relatively stable across a relatively wide range of values for VCC 321. By maintaining a relatively stable value for IQ 341 and ICC1346, in some embodiments, SRBC 340 may regulate IQ 341 sufficiently to maintain ICC1346 within approximately 3.5% of its nominal value.
During normal operation, IQ 341 is combined with the IRF 332 generated by transmitter 330 to form a base current IB 347 for RF Power transistor 344. For quiescent state analysis IB 347 is equal to IQ 341 and IB 347 will not be referred to herein. RF power transistor 344 may be implemented as a relatively large npn transistor suitable for generating sufficient current to drive one or more subsequent power amplifier stages (not depicted). In other embodiments, RF power transistor 344 may be a pnp transistor or a p-type or n-type metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) transistor.
ICC1346 represents the steady-state collector current of RF power transistor 344. In some embodiments, SRBC 340 ensures a stable value of ICC1346 by regulating IQ 341, which is provided to control terminal 345 of RF power transistor 344. SRBC 340 is operable to reduce or eliminate dependence of IQ 341 on VCC 321. In some embodiments, for example a ratio of ΔIQ to ΔVCC is less than approximately 10%, where ΔIQ represents a percentage change in IQ 341 and ΔVCC represents a percentage change in VCC. Because of the very strong dependence between IQ 341 and ICC1346, SRBC 340 reduces the dependence of ICC1346 on VCC 321.
Referring now to
SRBC 340 as depicted in
SRBC 340 as shown includes a first subcircuit 510, a second subcircuit 520, and a third subcircuit 530. First subcircuit 510 as shown carries an unregulated current (IUNREG) 580 from unregulated node 550 to a regulated node 560. IUNREG 580 is a strong function of ISUPPLY 580.
Second subcircuit 520 is configured to monitor or detect a voltage or current of unregulated node 550 and thereby monitor or detect a variance component VVAR of VCC 321. Based on the monitored or detected value of VVAR, second subcircuit 520 as shown is designed to draw a current, referred to herein as compensation current (ICOMP) 582 from regulated node 560. In some embodiments, SRBC 340 is designed so that ICOMP 582 is approximately equal to and offsets the variance component of IUNREG 580. In these embodiments, third subcircuit 530, which carries IREG 584, is constrained by Kirchoff's current law to approximate the nominal component of IUNREG 584. Specifically, with first subcircuit 510 carrying an IUNREG 580, having a nominal component and a variance component, to regulated node 560 and second subcircuit 520 drawing ICOMP 582, approximately equal to the variance component of IUNREG 580 from regulated node 560, the current drawn away from regulated node 560, i.e., IREG 584, is maintained at a value that is approximately equal to the nominal component of IUNREG 580. By maintaining IREG 584 free or approximately free of a variance component, SRBC 340 provides a quiescent state that is relatively immune to variations in supply voltage while, at the same time, eliminating the need for an external voltage regulator.
As shown in
Second subcircuit 520 as shown in
Third subcircuit 530 as shown is implemented as a simple conductor 532 arranged to convey IREG 584 from regulated node 560 to a control terminal of the biased transistor or to a circuit that drives the current provided to the control terminal of the biased transistor.
Variations of the voltage and/or current at unregulated node 550 cause changes in IUNREG 580. Second subcircuit 520 is operable to effect a change in ICOMP 582 that largely negates changes in IUNREG 580 and thereby results in an IREG 584 that is largely unaffected by voltage/current state changes at unregulated node 550.
Referring to
SRBC 340 implemented as shown in
Comparing
As depicted in
When VCC 321 increases from its nominal value, the R1 current (I1) increases. Using Kirchoff's current law at node 550, an increase in I1 results in an increase in I2, an increase in R3 current (I3), or both. Increases in I3 have an amplified effect on ICOMP 582 because the I3 determines the base current (I4) for Q1631. Increases in I2, on the other hand, produce a fractional increase in ICOMP 582, i.e., an increase that is less than unity.
In some embodiments, self regulation is achieved by implementing SRBC 340 wherein an increase in I1 produces an increase in I2 that is closely matched by an increase in ICOMP 582. If an increase in I2 is closely matched by an increase in ICOMP 582, a current analysis of node 560 dictates that IREG 584 remains relatively stable. In this manner, variations in the VCC 321 do not substantially alter the quiescent current IQ 341 that is provided to RF power transistor 344.
To design SRBC 340, Ohm's law may be used to describe the voltage/current relationship for R1621, R2622, R3623, and R4624.
R1*I1=VCC−V1 [Eq. 1]
R2*I2=V1−V2 [Eq. 2]
R3*I3=V1−V3−1.25 (where 1.25 is an approximate value of the turn on voltage for Q2632, in other embodiments, the turn on voltage may be 0.7 V) [Eq. 3]
K*R4*I3=V3−2.50 (where K is a number between 0 and 1 that reflects the fraction of I3 that flows through R4 to Q1631). [Eq. 4]
Kirchoff's current law can be used on node 550 and node 610 respectively to yield:
I1=I2+I3 [Eq. 5]
I2=IREG+ICOMP [Eq. 6]
where ICOMP is the collector current of transistor Q1631.
Using Eq. 6 to substitute for I2 in Eq. 5, substituting β*K*I3 for ICOMP, and rearranging for IREG yields:
IREG=I1−I3+β*K*I3 or [Eq. 7]
IREG=I1−(1−β*K)*I3 [Eq. 8]
To be self-regulating, SRBC 340 should exhibit the property that ΔIREG/ΔVcc approximates 0. Differentiating Eq. 8 with respect to VCC produces:
ΔIREG/ΔVcc=ΔI1/ΔVcc−(1−β*K)ΔI3/ΔVcc [Eq. 9]
Setting ΔIREG/ΔVcc to 0 produces:
ΔI1/ΔVcc=(1−β*K)ΔI3/ΔVcc [Eq. 10]
To solve Eq. 10 and thereby obtain an expression for the conditions desirable for achieving regulation, ΔI1/ΔVcc may be expressed in terms of ΔI3/ΔVcc. This can be done by differentiating Eq. 3 with respect to VCC 321 to obtain an expression of ΔI3/ΔVcc in terms of ΔV1/ΔVcc and ΔV3/ΔVcc. Differentiating Eq. 4 obtains an expression of ΔV3/ΔVcc in terms of ΔI3/ΔVcc that can be substituted into differentiated Eq. 3 to obtain an expression of ΔV1/ΔVcc in terms of ΔI3/ΔVcc. Eq. 1 may then be differentiated to obtain an expression of ΔI1/ΔVcc in terms of ΔV1/ΔVcc. Differentiated Eq. 1 and differentiated Eq. 3 may then be combined to obtain an expression of ΔI1/ΔVcc in terms of ΔI3/ΔVcc. This expression replaces the left hand side of Eq. 10, which is then solved:
(R3+K*R4)=(1−β*K). [Eq. 11]
When Eq. 11 is true, the corresponding SRBC 340 achieves self regulation as described.
In one implementation, suitable values for the elements of SRBC 340 include: R1 2.3 KΩ, R2 200Ω, R3 1 KΩ, R4 100Ω, R5 500Ω, R6 8.5 KΩ, R7 1.7 KΩ, and R8 10 KΩ. In this implementation, suitable values for the areas of transistors 631 through 635 include Q1—120 μm2, Q2—5 μm2, Q3—5 μm2, Q4 160 μm2, Q5—5 μm2, and QRF—5760 μm2. β values for all transistors 631 through 635 are in excess of 10 in some embodiments and in excess of 100 in some other embodiments.
Referring to
Referring back to
Some embodiments of the quiescent adjustment control circuitry are designed for use with values of VCONTROL 630 in the range of approximately 1 V to 2.5 V. In this range, between the cut in voltage for adjustment transistor Q5635 and saturation, the collector current of transistor Q5635 is a strong function of VCONTROL 630. As VCONTROL 630 increases from a voltage just sufficient to forward bias the base-emitter junction of Q5635 to a voltage just sufficient to saturate Q5635, the current terminals of Q5635 draw an increasing amount of current. The increased Q5 current (referred to as the adjustment current) may be accommodated, at least in part, by an increase in the R5 current (I5). An increase in I5 corresponds to a decrease in I4, which is the control current for Q1631. The resulting decrease in ICOMP 582 produces a corresponding increase in IREG 584, which causes an increase in IQ 341. After Q5 saturates, additional increases in VCONTROL 630 do not produce substantial increases in IQ 341.
Although the invention is described herein with reference to specific embodiments, various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention as set forth in the claims below. For example, although the self regulating biasing circuit is illustrated as being comprised entirely of bipolar transistors, other embodiments may employ MOS transistors. Similarly, although the depicted embodiment described a self regulated biasing circuit for a power amplified in an RF circuit, the self regulated control may be implemented in other types of circuits. As another example, although
Unless stated otherwise, terms such as “first” and “second” are used to arbitrarily distinguish between the elements such terms describe. Thus, these terms are not necessarily intended to indicate temporal or other prioritization of such elements.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4491691 | Embree et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4567333 | Embree et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4827222 | Hester et al. | May 1989 | A |
4959618 | Shier | Sep 1990 | A |
5349286 | Marshall et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5532616 | Keeney | Jul 1996 | A |
5592123 | Ulbrich | Jan 1997 | A |
5684394 | Marshall | Nov 1997 | A |
5986501 | Rafati et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002243 | Marshall | Dec 1999 | A |
6023185 | Galipeau et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6259238 | Hastings | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6339319 | Clapp, III | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6496317 | Lacombe | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6717463 | Aparin et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6914475 | Enriquez et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6946911 | Yang et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6972624 | Stroet | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6980052 | Stroet | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7088179 | Gilbert et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7109800 | Noh et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7262657 | Nellis et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7352231 | Hastings | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7466202 | Karthaus et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7495511 | Gilbert et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7514989 | Somerville et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
20010022700 | Lacombe | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020067205 | Aparin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020146993 | Persico et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030222706 | Enriquez et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050007177 | Hastings | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050057304 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060001475 | Price, Jr. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060208796 | Nellis et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060238254 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060255838 | Bergmann | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070046603 | Smith et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069992 | Smith et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070085779 | Smith et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070222519 | Deng et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070285171 | Karthaus et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070290757 | Gilbert et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080048634 | Kotchkine et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080100382 | Fisher et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080303756 | Smith | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090140797 | Kuehlwein et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090195318 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |