The present invention relates generally to contamination barriers for pumps, and more particularly in one aspect to a breastpump assembly including an improved barrier to prevent milk from entering and possibly contaminating a pumping mechanism for the breastpump.
Breastpumps are well known, and generally comprise a hood or shield that fits over the breast, a vacuum pump connected to the hood for generating an intermittent vacuum (or negative pressure) within the breastshield, and a receptacle for expressed milk. Negative pressure is pressure below atmospheric pressure. The intermittent suction action of the vacuum pump serves to pull on the breast and nipple and thereby express milk. The expressed milk typically flows from the hood, through a conduit structure and into a collection container, such as a baby bottle, for storage and later use.
Breastpumps can be manually or electrically operated. With manually operated pumps, the pumping action is done by reciprocating a piston or lever by hand, or compressing a flexible bulb, as shown in Medela's U.S. Publication No. 2004/0039330. With electrically operated pumps, the pumping action generated by a motor driven pump and typically conveyed by an air hose, or air line, that connects to the breastshield assembly.
In most instances, the pressure applied at the breast is a negative pressure (suction). That negative pressure is typically applied to the interior of the breastshield in a singular fashion, that is, without any kind of differential vacuum application over the breastshield as a whole. This has ordinarily been done through a cyclic pattern, e.g., intermittent suction. Breastpumps of this kind, which only pull and release suction, are known as simple pumps.
There are also breastpumps that apply a vacuum pressure and a positive pressure, typically applied to the interior of the breastshield, known as complex pumps. Typically, a vacuum pump that generates a positive pressure, (pressure above atmospheric pressure,) assists in forcing the expressed milk through a valve and into the collection container. A breastpump of the foregoing type is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,857,051 to Larsson, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference for further details of a breastpump assembly in general.
Positive pressure opens the valve, often used with breastpumps, to assist in movement of the breast milk through the conduit structure and into the bottle. During pumping, the expelled milk will ultimately be separated from the air drawn back and forth in the air hose, and to and from the breastshield. Some breastpumps use gravity and geometry, such as a splashguard, to separate the milk and air (air being the working fluid), but these breastpumps are often difficult to clean, and the orientation of the breastshield in use may be thereby limited. Other breastpumps use a filter, for example a hydrophobic filter, to prevent milk from entering the air hose and/or pump. That filter can become saturated, shutting down pumping; it must also be cleaned and even periodically replaced. The objective of these efforts is to isolate parts of the breastpump from milk or other liquids/bacteriological material that would constitute a contaminant, or foul the works (such as milk finding its way to the pump mechanism). In institutional settings, for another example, it is desirable to have a pump that can be transferred between mothers, yet the pump mechanism remains isolated from one mother to the next.
Some conventional electric breastpumps also use a moveable, sometimes collapsible, membrane or barrier, that separates the breastshield (including valve) from the pumping mechanism. During operation, two pressures are realized: a first pressure on the vacuum side of the membrane, or pump vacuum, and a second pressure on the breastshield side of the membrane, or breastshield vacuum. The vacuum pump communicates a negative pressure to the membrane via the air hose, such that the first pressure is greater than the second pressure, or in similar terms, the pump vacuum is greater than the breastshield vacuum. This differential vacuum causes the membrane to collapse or move. A problem with some conventional breastpumps of this type is that the membrane may not return to an initial state or position, i.e., it may end up locking or buckling.
This type of breastpump generally requires a positive pressure from the breastshield side of the membrane to push the membrane past a lock or buckle point in order to return the membrane to the non-collapsed state during a breastpump cycle. A breastpump of the foregoing type is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,941,847 to Huber. A typical issue with these types of pumps is that leakages, evaporation, expulsion of milk and breast extension hysteresis do not ensure that the membrane returns fully to its initial non-collapsed state without the assistance of a positive pressure.
Some conventional manual breastpumps also include a collapsible or movable membrane that has a significant energy loss in “transferring” vacuum from one side to the other. The mechanical coefficient across the barrier membrane needs dramatic improvement.
Accordingly, a breastpump that reduces or eliminates contamination in the upstream pump air line and pump by isolating the pressure source from the expressed milk is desired to protect the user and prevent damage to the pump mechanism. A much more energy efficient pump system that uses a movable membrane/barrier for vacuum communication is also highly desirable.
The present invention, in perhaps one of its broadest expressions, comprises a barrier for a pump or a pumping system, that separates parts of the pump while transferring a pressure change across the barrier. When a pressure, as from a vacuum source, is applied to the barrier, the barrier achieves a distended state and when the vacuum is released, as by a return to atmospheric pressure, the barrier has a natural bias that returns it to an initial “pre-loaded” state. This advantageously can actually yield a slight positive pressure from the system and the breastshield side or the downstream side of the barrier (relative to the upstream vacuum source). “Bias” is used herein to describe the pre-set tendency of the barrier to try and return to this initial state.
Although embodiments of the present invention discussed herein are directed to breastpump systems, it is contemplated that various other applications for a self-returning barrier exist, for example, in a general sense to similar pump systems. This applies to other attributes of the invention as well.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a self-returning barrier such that a source of positive pressure from the pump is not required to return the barrier to its initial state from a distended state during a breastpump cycle, and further that the mechanical transfer of vacuum across the barrier is highly efficient. The force required to distend the barrier of the present invention is determined by material construction, breastshield size, breast size, and the vacuum level of the pump; but in any of these systems, displacement of the barrier to a distended state requires that the pump vacuum is greater than the breastshield vacuum, i.e., there is energy lost in the mechanical transfer of vacuum from one side of the barrier to the other. The present invention achieves a highly efficient mechanical transfer.
The geometry of the inventive barrier acts as a spring in a preferred form. The barrier geometry maintains a low spring rate. A sufficient spring force designed into the barrier returns the barrier to the initial state, and further can assist in the expulsion of milk through a valve and into a collection container.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a barrier with a pre-loaded residual force when assembled. That is, the barrier is compressed along a central axis in the assembled state. The barrier is thus pre-loaded, i.e., biased when in this assembled state.
Yet another object is to provide a self-returning barrier that returns to an initial state from a distended state in a brief time frame, i.e., 150 milliseconds or less, without assistance from the pump to thereby further, minimize energy expenditure on the breastpump system.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a barrier to isolate parts of the pump, as from contaminants or the like that could otherwise pass.
Yet another aspect of the present invention is to provide a self-returning barrier that collapses uniformly as well as returns to an initial state uniformly. The barrier of the present invention thereby eliminates the need to apply force to move through non-uniform states, such as in a lock or buckle condition of the prior art. The barrier of the present invention includes a corrugated geometry to prevent it from locking up or buckling. In one form this geometry comprises one or more undulations in the barrier that are generally concentric on a convex surface.
During collapse or achievement of a distended state, the barrier of the present invention in a preferred form never locks or buckles, even during circumstances when the pump vacuum remains less than the breastshield vacuum or when the pump vacuum is equal to the breastshield vacuum. Likewise, the barrier of the present invention never locks or buckles during return from a distended state to an initial state, even during the circumstances when the vacuum pressure is greater than the breastshield vacuum or the vacuums are equal.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide a self-returning barrier that works with manually operated as well as electrically operated breastpumps. Furthermore, a self-returning barrier is provided that may function with complex electrical pumps providing a negative pressure and a positive pressure, and also with a simple pump providing only negative pressure (and a vent to atmosphere).
In particular, the barrier of the present invention does not require assistance from the vacuum pump, such as the positive force of air, for the barrier to return to its initial state during a breastpump cycle. The geometric and material construction of the barrier itself returns the barrier to its initial state after a suction phase.
In a broad embodiment, the present invention is a movable barrier for separating parts of a pump, as to prevent contamination that includes an initial state wherein the barrier is assembled as to possess a pre-load. When a vacuum source is applied to the barrier, the barrier achieves a distended state, and when the vacuum source is released, the barrier incrementally self-returns to an initial state.
The present invention, with application to a breastpump assembly, has a breastshield, a conduit structure and a collection container (bottle). A resilient barrier is assembled in a pre-loaded condition in a housing, which is located in an air pressure line, typically a vacuum line. When a vacuum is applied, the barrier achieves a distended state, and when the vacuum is released, the barrier utilizes the pre-load as a spring action to assist in transforming to its initial pre-load state.
In another aspect, a breastpump assembly has a contamination barrier located in a vacuum line between a vacuum pump and a breastshield. A housing has a breastshield side and a vacuum side, also referred to herein as vacuum pump side, separated and isolated from one another by the barrier. The barrier is assembled within the housing in an initial pre-loaded state such that said barrier has a bias toward the breastshield side when no vacuum is applied. When vacuum is applied, the barrier achieves a distended state, and when the vacuum is released, the barrier returns to the initial state.
In one embodiment, the barrier has a generally convex shape at least in part as presented by a convex barrier side, and is assembled within the foregoing housing so that the bias presses the convex barrier side against an internal breastshield side sidewall of the housing in the initial state. The convex barrier side has at least one undulation formed in its surface generally concentric with the center of the convexity of the barrier. In a most preferred form, the internal breastshield side sidewall has a shape that generally conforms to that of the convex barrier side, such that the barrier and the breastshield side sidewall substantially mate when in facial engagement (in the initial pre-load state or condition).
In the foregoing embodiment, the barrier becomes inverted under vacuum, and forms another generally convex shape when distended under vacuum, at least in part, as presented by the now inside-out barrier side in the distended state. A vacuum side sidewall has in this most preferred form, a shape that generally conforms to that of the distended barrier side, such that the barrier and the vacuum side sidewall substantially mate when in facial engagement.
In another aspect of the present invention, the barrier has a plurality of generally concentric undulations designed to provide bending moments for the barrier tending to return from a distended state to an initial state. This is contrasted with stretching of a barrier of the prior art, rather than bending.
It is yet another advantage of the present invention to provide a breastpump assembly which isolates parts of the pump in a vacuum line from contamination, such as between a breastshield and a vacuum source in communication with the breastshield via the vacuum line. The vacuum line is in communication with a housing that has a breastshield side and vacuum side. A resilient barrier having a form with a first surface that is, at least in part, generally domelike with an unassembled dome height as measured from a base of the dome to the first surface. The resilient barrier is assembled in the housing in a manner to separate and thereby isolate the breastshield housing side and vacuum housing side in an initial state with a pre-loaded condition for the barrier. The pre-loaded condition of the barrier has an assembled dome height that is less than the unassembled dome height.
Furthermore, the vacuum realized on the breastshield side follows a generally one to one relationship with the vacuum applied on the vacuum side, after an initial level of vacuum is realized on the vacuum pump side to overcome the pre-load condition. The initial level of vacuum to overcome the pre-load condition can be about 4 to 15 mmHg (negative) in one form of the invention. This yields a highly efficient vacuum transfer across the barrier. The foregoing embodiment can further include a milk conduit structure which conveys milk from the breastshield to a container via a catch chamber and a one-way valve between the catch chamber and the container. The barrier, upon returning to an initial state with a predetermined minimum amount of milk in the catch chamber, generates an increased pressure in the catch chamber relative to the container so as to open the valve and release milk to travel into the container.
These, together with other objects and advantages will be further understood in the details of the construction and operation of the invention as more fully hereinafter described, reference being had to the accompanying drawings, forming a part hereof, wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout, in which:
Although the embodiments of the present invention described herein are directed to breastpump assembly systems, which is the particular environment that the invention finds its origin, it is contemplated that the present invention has various other applications, such as any pump system that requires a barrier to prevent contamination, or that may benefit from a movable membrane that is very efficient in transmitting pressure changes from a volume (or working fluid) on one side to a volume (or working fluid) on the other side.
The barrier of the present invention works with simple manually operated breastpumps that may provide only suction (and a vent to atmosphere), as well as more complex pumps, such as motorized pumps, and pumps providing both suction and a positive pressure. Thus, while described in particular respects with a source of vacuum, the pressure source could also be a positive pressure moving the barrier.
The self-returning contamination barrier 100 is made of a resilient material, such as an elastomer, or any plastic and rubber combination that permits the barrier to function as a spring, described more fully below. The preferred embodiment is constructed of liquid injection molded silicone (LIMS), such as LIM 6050 that available from General Electric (GE).
The barrier 100 is assembled with a breastpump protection to eliminate contamination in the pump air line.
The frontwall surface 502 most preferably has a shape that generally matches the outer surface 104 of the barrier 100 when it is in facial engagement in the initial state. The interior rearwall surface 402 most preferably has a shape that generally matches the inner surface 102 of the barrier 100 in a distended (inverted) state, described more fully below. The rim 114 forms a seal between the interior surface 502 of the front housing part 204 and the interior surface 402 of the rear housing part 206.
Once assembled within the housing, the barrier 100 separates and isolates the breastshield side of the housing 204 and the vacuum side of the housing 206. The barrier 100 is assembled in a pre-loaded initial state, also referred to herein as a first or initial position, or state, and maintains a concave shape as viewed from the vacuum side or a convex shape as viewed form the breastshield side, between the housing parts 204, 206, as shown in
As can be seen from
With reference to
When a vacuum or negative pressure is applied to the breastshield 202 from a well known type of suction device 706, which may be manually operated or motor driven, the valve 101 closes the collection chamber 704, and a negative pressure is applied to the interior of the breastshield 202. Milk is collected within the collection chamber 704. When the negative pressure is released, the valve 101 opens to pass milk expressed into the breastshield 202 and thence to the collection chamber 704, to flow into the bottle 210. As noted, the valve mechanism may be of many types, for example a duckbill type.
The vacuum or suction device 706 here is a house-current driven vacuum pump using a tube, or air line 708 to convey the vacuum, although it is contemplated that the vacuum device 706 may be a manually operated piston pump, or a battery operated diaphragm pump. The invention herein is, however, not limited to any particular kind of vacuum device.
The vacuum source 706 connects via air line tube 708 to a port 212 formed on the rear housing 206. The port 212 extends through surface 402 and communicates with the interior of the rear housing 206. There is an interior surface 502 of the front housing 204, against which the barrier 100 is initially positioned, as shown in
As stated, just before the vacuum source is applied, the barrier 100 is in facial engagement with the interior frontwall surface 502 of the front housing 204. The frontwall surface 502 has a shape that generally matches the outer surface 104 of the barrier 100 in this initial state. This matching engagement, which could also be less exact for substantially matching engagement, provides the smallest amount of “dead” volume on the breastshield side. It should be appreciated that the invention provides a very efficient vacuum transfer mechanism, which will use less energy and therefore extend the useful life of a battery-operated pump.
The breastpump assembly 200 of the present invention operates through a breastpump cycle of suction, air line release, and milk release.
As shown in
As the barrier transforms to and from a distended state and an initial state, the exact position of barrier between the front housing 204 and rear housing 206 is determined by the difference between the first pressure A on the vacuum side of the barrier and the second pressure B on the breastshield side, i.e., differential vacuum. In addition to a first pressure and second pressure, the barrier 100 defines a first volume on the vacuum side and a second volume on the breastshield side. It should be noted that as the barrier moves, the first volume and second volume (in addition to the first pressure and second pressure) change respectively.
In the collection chamber release phase, vacuum is released, typically by release to atmospheric pressure into the air line 708. The breastpump enters the air line release phase where energy stored (pre-load) in the barrier 100 causes the barrier 100 to return to its initial state (
It will be noted that the invention may be adapted so that the barrier does not return completely to the initial state. This might be in a situation where minimum vacuum level is to be maintained in the breastshield during pumping. The tendency of the barrier nonetheless causes it to move toward that initial state, if not achieving it.
The FREESYTLE curve was made with an embodiment of the invention. As indicated, it had a pre-load of 4 mmHg, i.e., it required that amount of vacuum before the barrier began to move. PURELY YOURS, ISIS IQ DUO and EMBRACE are commercial products. They are assembled without a pre-load. As can by seen in
It is understood that there may be many shapes, sizes, and configurations of the barrier that will fall within the scope of the invention. The use of the terms dome, concave and convex does not limit the invention to a round barrier. Any shape, e.g., non-round barrier is contemplated with material thickness and shape varying with respect to distance and angle from the center of the barrier to achieve the spring action discussed herein. It is seen that the objects set forth above, among those made apparent from the preceding description, are efficiently attained and, since certain changes may be made in the above constructions without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense. It is also to be understood that the following claims are intended to cover all of the generic as well as specific features of the invention herein described, and all statements of the scope of the invention that, as a matter of language, might be said to fall therebetween.
While the present invention has been described with reference to a particular embodiment, those skilled in the art will recognize that many changes may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the present invention. Each of these embodiments and variants thereof is contemplated as falling with the scope of the claimed invention, as set forth in the following claims.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/269,381, filed Oct. 7, 2011, which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/591,276, entitled “Self Returning Contamination Barrier,” filed Nov. 1, 2006, that issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,187,227 on May 29, 2012, the contents of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
301535 | Tatum | Jul 1884 | A |
316584 | Turner | Apr 1885 | A |
1670610 | Colby | May 1928 | A |
2148918 | Weber | Feb 1939 | A |
2273679 | Westberg | Feb 1942 | A |
2292401 | Orre | Aug 1942 | A |
2371632 | Lippincott | Mar 1945 | A |
2419795 | Saunders | Apr 1947 | A |
2495307 | Abramson | Jan 1950 | A |
2687845 | Young et al. | Aug 1954 | A |
3083943 | Steward, Jr. et al. | Apr 1963 | A |
3140085 | de Carbon | Jul 1964 | A |
3465112 | Reichert et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
684078 | Nielsen | Aug 1972 | A |
3738363 | Lunas et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
784780 | Laughlin | Jan 1974 | A |
3782385 | Loyd | Jan 1974 | A |
3822703 | Davisson | Jul 1974 | A |
3830238 | Kurtz et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3911920 | Susinn | Oct 1975 | A |
3931834 | Caillet | Jan 1976 | A |
D246729 | Murphy | Dec 1977 | S |
4249481 | Adams | Feb 1981 | A |
4263912 | Adams | Apr 1981 | A |
4323067 | Adams | Apr 1982 | A |
4411603 | Kell | Oct 1983 | A |
4427470 | Kolff | Jan 1984 | A |
4573994 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4583970 | Kirchner | Apr 1986 | A |
4634430 | Polaschegg | Jan 1987 | A |
4649863 | Hoefelmayr et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4673388 | Schlensog et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4759385 | Hudson, Jr. | Jul 1988 | A |
4775366 | Rosenblatt | Oct 1988 | A |
4794915 | Larsson | Jan 1989 | A |
4799922 | Beer et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4799924 | Rosenblatt | Jan 1989 | A |
4799925 | Rosenblatt | Jan 1989 | A |
4820273 | Reinicke | Apr 1989 | A |
4864918 | Martin | Sep 1989 | A |
4883464 | Morifuki | Nov 1989 | A |
4886494 | Morifuji | Dec 1989 | A |
4915017 | Perlov | Apr 1990 | A |
4961726 | Richter | Oct 1990 | A |
5009638 | Riedweg et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5071403 | Larsson | Dec 1991 | A |
5089020 | Koppert | Feb 1992 | A |
5123332 | Thayer et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5145336 | Becker et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5149413 | Maget | Sep 1992 | A |
5242406 | Gross et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5349896 | Delaney, III et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5358476 | Wilson | Oct 1994 | A |
5749850 | Williams et al. | May 1998 | A |
5785508 | Bolt | Jul 1998 | A |
5814019 | Steinbach et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817001 | Leschinsky et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5941847 | Huber et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6110140 | Silver | Aug 2000 | A |
6378739 | Maas et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6390338 | Baudin | May 2002 | B1 |
6461324 | Schlensog | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6499729 | Walterbusch | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6530900 | Daily et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6547756 | Greter et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6652510 | Lord et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
D484236 | Renz et al. | Dec 2003 | S |
6663587 | Silver et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
D485614 | Renz et al. | Jan 2004 | S |
D486223 | Robson et al. | Feb 2004 | S |
6699213 | Annis et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6706012 | McKendry et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6729494 | Portman et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746637 | Huss et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6749582 | Britto et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6776591 | Rinninger et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6863648 | Williams et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6994030 | Perut et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7029454 | Watanabe | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7066874 | Riebman et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
D609330 | Paterson et al. | Feb 2010 | S |
D609331 | Paterson et al. | Feb 2010 | S |
7727182 | Silver | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7806855 | Kliegman et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8187227 | Luzbetak et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
D676956 | Kirchner | Feb 2013 | S |
8915880 | Darnell | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9011372 | Jones | Apr 2015 | B2 |
D773643 | Luzbetak et al. | Dec 2016 | S |
9814809 | Luzbetak et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20030004459 | McKendry et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030050623 | Lord et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030139702 | Renz et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149398 | Renz et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040087898 | Weniger | May 2004 | A1 |
20040158199 | McKendry et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050154348 | Lantz et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154349 | Renz et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050228342 | Yuen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060111664 | Samson | May 2006 | A1 |
20080009815 | Grabenkort et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033352 | Annis et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080171970 | Luzbetak et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080208115 | Kliegman et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090099511 | Sutrina et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100174232 | Wortley | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100228188 | Kunzler et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100324477 | Paterson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324478 | Kazazoglu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110245763 | Myers | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20130023821 | Khalil et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20150314053 | Furrer et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150328380 | Furrer et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007318174 | Jul 2011 | AU |
2667089 | Jul 2012 | CA |
2580971 | Oct 2003 | CN |
101553264 | Oct 2009 | CN |
2658322 | Jun 1978 | DE |
8714995 | Dec 1987 | DE |
0466462 | Jan 1992 | EP |
2077868 | Jul 2016 | EP |
1067421 | Jun 1954 | FR |
185521 | Sep 1922 | GB |
759051 | Oct 1956 | GB |
2082920 | Mar 1982 | GB |
2002-035111 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2004-000486 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2006-015004 | Jan 2006 | JP |
5121840 | Jan 2013 | JP |
10-1193891 | Oct 2012 | KR |
2009004790 | May 2009 | MX |
2004058330 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2006052485 | May 2006 | WO |
2008057218 | May 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Int. App No. PCT/US2007/022507, dated Jun. 11, 2008. |
Spectra Spare Parts/Accessories—Backflow Protector Membranes (2 pk). Pupsik. posted as early as Feb. 17, 2014 online. www.pupsikstudio.com. Date accessed Apr. 13, 2016. <http://www.pupsikstudio.com/spectra-spare-parts-accessories-large-membrane-s1-s2-m1-2-pk.html>. |
Medela Swing and Swing Maxi. Best Breast Pump Reviews, www.bestbreastpumpreviewsformoms.com. Date accessed Apr. 13, 2016. <http://www.bestbreastpumpreviewsformoms.com/medela-swing-and-swing-maxi/>. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180028731 A1 | Feb 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13269381 | Oct 2011 | US |
Child | 15729646 | US | |
Parent | 11591276 | Nov 2006 | US |
Child | 13269381 | US |