The invention relates to a timepiece escapement mechanism, including at least one lever and at least one escapement wheel, said at least one lever being arranged to cooperate, on the one hand, with an inertial mass of a mechanical oscillator, and subjected, directly or indirectly, to the action of elastic return means included in said mechanical oscillator, and, on the other hand, at pallets carried by or included in said lever, with teeth included in said at least one escapement wheel.
The invention relates to the field of timepiece escapement mechanisms.
One of the important properties of a timepiece escapement mechanism is self-starting. This is the ability of the escapement to restart “by itself” after the balance has stopped. There are two situations in which this property is important:
Most known escapements can be roughly divided into two classes:
The criterion which allows distinguishing these two classes is whether, when the balance is in its rest position (zero torque of the elastic return means: balance-spring or flexible guide blades), the escapement wheel can be on a rest plane or not. If the escapement wheel is on the rest plane when the balance is in its rest position, then the escapement cannot start by itself.
Most escapements used in wristwatches are potentially self-starting, in particular because of the risk associated with the acceleration: the balance must not be stopped by a shock or sudden acceleration, and must not be able to start oscillating again.
The invention described here relates to optimising the self-starting of an escapement mechanism that is already potentially self-starting.
For a potentially self-starting escapement to start, the barrel torque must be sufficient to wind the balance-spring, or more generally to overcome the return torque of the oscillator (e.g. rigidity of the flexible guide). This means that when the barrel is almost completely let down, a potentially self-starting escapement does not start by itself. When the barrel is fully wound, the situation depends on the calibre in question: some calibres start by themselves, while others need a little “shaking” to get them to start.
The aim of the invention is to improve the self-starting of calibres that are “potentially self-starting”, but whose fully wound barrel torque is not sufficient for the escapement to start on its own.
The invention consists in optimising the shape of the pallet of the lever and/or the tooth of the escapement wheel, to promote self-starting. To achieve this, a particular pallet and/or tooth geometry is created so that the return torque of the oscillator which is directly mounted on the escapement wheel is almost constant over the entire angle of lift.
To this end, the invention relates to a timepiece escapement mechanism according to claim 1.
The invention also includes a horological movement including such an escapement mechanism.
The invention also includes a timepiece, in particular a watch, including at least one such horological movement.
The aims, advantages and features of the invention will become clearer on reading the following detailed description, with reference to the appended drawings, where:
The invention relates to a timepiece escapement mechanism 100, including at least one lever 10 and at least one escapement wheel 20. This at least one lever 10 is arranged to cooperate, on the one hand, with an inertial mass 40 of a mechanical oscillator 400 and is subjected, directly or indirectly, to the action of elastic return means 50 included in this mechanical oscillator 400. And this at least one lever 10 is arranged to cooperate, on the other hand, at pallets 1 carried by or included in this lever 10, with teeth 2 included in this at least one escapement wheel 20.
According to the invention, at least one said pallet 1 and/or at least one said tooth 2 includes an impulse zone including two zones, one for an angular portion where said elastic return means tend to drive said escapement wheel 20, and the other for another angular portion where said elastic return means 50 tend to oppose said escapement wheel 20, said two zones being arranged so as to minimise the maximum moment of the elastic return means seen by said escapement wheel 20.
More particularly, each said pallet 1 and/or each said tooth 2 includes an impulse zone including two zones, one for an angular portion where said elastic return means tend to drive said escapement wheel 20, and the other for another angular portion where said elastic return means 50 tend to oppose said escapement wheel 20, said two zones being arranged so as to minimise the maximum moment of the elastic return means seen by said escapement wheel 20.
The angle range of the escapement wheel corresponds to the half angle between two teeth θ=360°/number of teeth/2: this is the angle of advance of the wheel during an alternation of the oscillator, when the oscillator travels through the angle of lift.
It is seen that in the left half of the angle range, the oscillator return torque (e.g. the balance-spring torque) helps the lever to be displaced (negative torque), therefore the wheel does not need to exert any torque to displace the lever. However, in the right half of the angle range, the return torque of the oscillator returns the lever to its intermediate position, therefore, the wheel must exert more and more torque to displace the lever (positive and increasing torque). The “intermediate position” here refers to the position of the lever when the inertial mass of the oscillator is in its equilibrium position: in this position, the elastic return means, such as a spiral spring, or else flexible guides, do not exert any force or torque on the lever.
The aim of the invention is to propose pallet and tooth profiles such that the oscillator return torque CR which is directly mounted on the escapement wheel is close to the shape shown in
Energy reasoning allows showing that by doing this, the torque required for the wheel to displace the lever will be in the range of up to four times lower than in the prior art. Indeed, in the case where the friction coefficients are zero, the mechanical energy is conserved. This means that the integral of the torque over the angle, at the escapement wheel, must be equal to the elastic energy Eel in the oscillator return spring when the oscillator exits the angle of lift.
In the prior art, the integral of the torque over the angle of the escapement wheel has the value Mmax/2×θ/2 (area of each of the 2 left and right triangles in
therefore M max/2×θ/2=Eel,
so M max=4Eel/θ,
and θ=4Eel/M max.
In the case of the invention, two cases are to be dealt with separately for the moment values Mleft (labelled MI in
In the case where the friction coefficients are non-zero, these calculations are more complicated, but the rule “the torque required for self-starting becomes lower if it is managed that the oscillator restoring torque which is directly mounted on the wheel is constant” generally remains valid.
It is therefore a question of defining an appropriate geometry for the pallets (or teeth), so that the return torque of the oscillator which is directly mounted on the wheel is approximately constant.
The first zone Z1 according to the invention is the traditional resting plane ZR of a standard lever pallet.
The second zone Z2 is connected to the first zone Z1 at a first edge A. In a particular case, the second zone Z2 and the first zone Z1 are planar and form a dihedron.
The third zone Z3 is connected to the second zone Z2 at a second edge B. In a particular case which is not illustrated, the second zone Z2 and the third zone Z3 are planar and form a dihedron. In another particular case, which is not illustrated, the third zone Z3 is formed by two planar surfaces which form a dihedron.
Different simulations allow drawing the curves of
For the standard pallet in
The right side of
The relative gain at the moment of the return torque CR is close to a factor 2, and less than the expected factor 4. The reasons are:
The angle going from the normal to the radial does not always have the same direction. An angle going in the trigonometric direction in the figure is referred to here as positive, and an angle going in the opposite direction is referred to as negative.
More particularly:
Even more particularly, the second angle ω2 between the second normal N2 and the second radial OQ is less than a tan (μ), where μ is the coefficient of friction between at least one pallet 1 and at least one tooth 2, the notation “a tan” meaning the tangent arc. The coefficient of friction μ is preferably comprised between 0.10 and 0.30. More particularly, the coefficient of friction μ is comprised between 0.12 and 0.24. Even more particularly, the coefficient of friction μ is equal to 0.2; the angle ω1 between the normal N1 and the radial OQ is then less than a tan (0.2).
Even more particularly, the third angle ω3 between the third normal N3 and the third radial OR is greater than a tan (μ). The coefficient of friction μ is preferably comprised between 0.10 and 0.30. More particularly, the coefficient of friction μ is comprised between 0.16 and 0.24. Even more particularly the coefficient of friction μ is equal to 0.2; the angle ω1 between the normal N1 and the radial OQ is then greater than a tan (0.2).
It is understood that this geometry can be applied to both the pallets of the lever and the teeth of the escapement wheel.
The pallets can be fastened on the oscillator (frictional rest).
The special profile described here can be fitted to the escapement wheel tooth.
More particularly, the contact between a lever pallet 1 and a tooth 2 of the escapement wheel 20 includes at least three zones, a first zone, called rest zone, where the torque is of negative direction, where the angle between the normal to the contact and the radial of the lever is negative, a second zone corresponding to the first half angle of lift, where the torque is of positive direction, where the angle is positive and of a value less than a predefined value, and a third zone corresponding to the second half angle of lift, where the torque is of positive direction, where the angle is positive and has a limited value greater than this predefined value.
More particularly, this predefined value is a tan (0.2) in the case of a coefficient of friction μ equal to 0.20, and would be a tan (0.15) in the case of the simulations in
The invention further includes a horological movement 500, in particular and without limitation as described by the Illustrated Professional Dictionary of Horology, by M. G-A Berner, © Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry FH, article 3091 A, including at least energy storage and distribution means 200 and a gear train 300 arranged to transmit the energy to at least one such escapement mechanism 100, and at least one mechanical oscillator 400 with at least one inertial mass 40 returned by elastic return means 50, said inertial mass 40 being arranged to cooperate with said at least one lever 10.
More particularly, said mechanical oscillator 400 is a balance-spring oscillator.
Naturally, the invention applies to the case where the pallet 1 is made of a material other than the lever 10 itself, which may allow adjusting the optimum coefficient of friction u. More particularly, at least one pallet 1 is directly mounted on a body included in the lever 10, and is made of a material other than that of this lever body.
More particularly, said mechanical oscillator 400 is a flexibly guided oscillator with at least one inertial mass 40 suspended by thin elastic blades constituting the elastic return means 50 of the oscillator 400.
The invention also includes a timepiece 1000, in particular a watch, including at least one such horological movement 500.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
22212186.5 | Dec 2022 | EP | regional |