This application claims the benefit of Danish Application No. PA 2005 00800 filed Jun. 1, 2005 and PCT/DK2006/000289 filed May 26, 2006, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The present invention concerns casting equipment with self-supporting intermediate walls for concrete casting machines of the kind typically used for making cast items in the form of concrete blocks for wall construction and elements, solid blocks or blocks with cavities or recesses. The casting equipment includes a cellular lower part with upwards and downwards open cells that define the desired basic shape of the individual blocks and elements. The cells are divided with self-supporting bolted intermediate walls, and a corresponding upper part with an upper retainer plate that includes pressing pistons projecting downwards, the pressing pistons designed with lower thrust plates which fit in the respective underlying cells in the lower part and thereby are useful for downwards retention in the compression stage, and ejection of the cast items from the cells, and where, if concrete blocks with cavities or recesses are produced, the lower part includes means ensuring that the core elements forming cavities maintain their position in the lower part.
In connection with casting concrete blocks on large machines, often two or more rows of concrete blocks are cast on each production plate. If the concrete blocks are with cavities, e.g. foundation blocks, perforated blocks and elements with cavities, there is used a casting equipment including a lower part with casting cells with hanging cores, corresponding to the desired shape of the cavity/recess in the concrete block. An upper part with pressing plates corresponding to the shape of the casting cells is used as multiple press piston during the compression so that the pressing plates at the stripping of the items by vertical displacement of the lower part are passed down through the casting cells.
From U.S. Pat. No. 1,471,951 is known a lower part of a mould for use in concrete casting equipment which mould includes a number of intermediate walls and partitionings, where one or more intermediate walls together with one or more partitionings are made as a self-supporting construction.
In order to utilise the mould area/production plate as optimally as possible, it is necessary to have as little spacing as possible between the cast rows. By enabling making the mould with a thinner intermediate wall, the production plate can be shorter, or the products be longer on a given production plate. The wasted space in the hardening chambers may thereby be reduced, or alternatively space can be provided for more production plates. In some cases, it may also be a question whether the product can be produced profitably on a given production plate at all, e.g. where the length of the product combined with the intermediate wall will entail that two or three rows of products just cannot be produced on the production plate. In these cases, the mould have often been made as fixed, welded moulds without replaceable wear parts, implying that the mould has to be discarded due to wear when one cell only exceeds the tolerances applied to the product in question.
Another advantage of the new construction is that a mould frame designed for the new construction may be used for other lengths of products by only making another type of partitioning and adding/removing intermediate walls, or that a mould frame can be equipped with partitionings and intermediate walls in order to produce differently sized products in the same mould. Another possibility is that the mould frame can be used for another width of the product by replacing end walls and add/remove partitionings, however, this option requires the presence of more holes in the mould frame at the front and rear.
The traditional configuration with double-row moulds has been that the mould frame is welded with a middle wall, whereby two mould frame spaces appear. In these mould frame spaces, the replaceable insert parts are fitted to form the shape of the cells and thereby the real shape of the product. These wear parts typically consist of a number of partitionings, which divide the mould frame spaces crosswise, and a gable plate at each side. The gable plates and the partitionings have been kept with the desired spacing corresponding to the desired block width with end plates. In order to secure the partitionings, end plates, partitionings and gable plates are all designed with mutually disposed cutouts. When partitioning plates, gable plates and end plates for filling out a mould frame space are in position, the insert parts are compressed in the mould space by means of bolts through the sides of the mould frame space. The end plates are bolted to the mould frame and thereby secure the intermediate wall dividing the mould frame space. Finally, the gable plates are fastened with bolts in the mould frame after intermediate layers have been placed behind the gable plates for filling the cavity appearing in order for the insert part to be fitted.
The drawback of the fixed, welded mould frame is that the intermediate wall and thereby the spacing between two or more rows of concrete blocks becomes disproportionately large, so that the production plate is not utilised optimally, or that the mould plate is to be greater to compensate for the greater wall thickness. The more rows of cast products, the less utilisation of the production plate, and thereby the hardening area where the production plates with products are disposed for hardening.
Alternatively, the entire lower mould part with cells is welded, where the cell walls are hardened (and thereby integrated) before welding together. In. order to enable welding together the hardened parts, prior to hardening the parts have to be covered on the faces where they are to be welded together later. This covering typically is effected with a coat of poisonous paint.
By this method of making, the entire insert has to be discarded as soon as one cell exceeds the tolerance of the product because of the unavoidable wear.
The method of making furthermore has the unfavourable property that it is difficult to achieve sufficiently fine/small tolerances due to the material shrinking caused by the weldings. It is very difficult to make the mould so that the cells in the mould have the same size, implying that due to wear, a cell which as new is within the tolerance very quickly will exceed the maximum dimension for the products a long time before a cell with a tolerance close to the minimum dimension.
In other cases, insert parts and wear parts are made of steel with great wearability. These parts are welded into the mould frame in order to form the cell apertures. Here, the durability has not shown to be satisfactory either. The method of making has also the unfavourable property that it is difficult to achieve sufficient small/fine tolerances, as it is very difficult to make the mould so that the cells in the mould have the same size due to material shrinking caused by weldings. This means that due to wear, a cell which as new is within the tolerance very quickly will exceed the maximum dimension for the products a long time before a cell with a tolerance close to the minimum dimension.
By the invention is indicated a lower part which includes a new self-supporting intermediate wall construction which by the special design of the intermediate walls entails that the intermediate walls go in and lock the intermediate walls with the partitionings. Together with the partitionings and the intermediate walls, the end walls constitute the entire insert. The insert parts are fastened releasably, preferably by bolt connections, to the mould frame.
By making the insert parts as single parts and subsequently hardening these single parts, it is much easier to control the tolerances on these single parts, whereby the single cells in the mould largely have the same size after assembling. Inaccuracies arising in connection with welding, e.g. material shrinkage, are thus eliminated.
The bearing partitioning is through-going from one end wall in the mould frame to the other end wall. The wear part on the end walls have two shapes, the end wall of one wear part having upper locking pins with largely the same width as the thickness of the partitionings, the end wall of the other wear part having lower locking pins with largely the same width as the thickness of the partitionings. Furthermore, the end wall of the second wear part also has a collar at the bottom projecting to support the end wall of wear part up under the mould frame. Hereby is ensured that the end wall, and thereby the entire insert, cannot slide upwards during the strong compressing vibration of the casting equipment.
The intermediate wall is constituted by two plates, one plate designed with upper pins extending largely halfway through the through-going bearing partitioning, the other plate designed with lower pins extending largely halfway through the through-going partitioning. When these two intermediate walls are mounted so that the plate with the upper pins is mounted from above, fitting into recesses at the top of the partitioning, and the plate with lower pins from below, fitting into recesses at the bottom of the partitioning, the intermediate wall can move neither up nor down.
The recesses in the partitionings are displaced in relation to the centre of the partitioning, so that when the two intermediate wall plates are mounted, they only form the intermediate wall, and when they are clamped together with bolts, they lock onto the partitionings. The intermediate plates of the outermost cells are further locking to the gable plates.
The reason for the pins only extending almost half through the partitionings is that on the other side of the partitioning there may also be mounted two intermediate wall plates with upper and lower pins, respectively. Due to the tolerances in the making process it is hereby ensured that all intermediate wall plates come into full contact with the partitionings at both sides. The partitioning plates are fixed/secured in the mould frame by the two types of end wall plates, alternately with an end wall plate with lower pins and an end wall plate with upper pins. The pins on the end wall plates have almost the same size as the thickness of the partitioning plates, thereby ensuring that the partitionings are secured and fixed in the mould frame when the screw bolts through the sides of the mould frame press the gable plates together around the other insert parts.
The advantage of the design is furthermore that if a partitioning, an end wall, an intermediate wall or a gable for some reason is damaged or worn quicker than the others, they may be replaced individually without having to disassemble the entire insert.
Another advantage of the invention is that if the concrete articles have cavities, the constituent core elements may be designed so that they are secured in their position in the mould by recesses in the self-supporting intermediate wall.
The invention is then described briefly with reference to the drawing, on which:
With a small distance (38), the production plate (34) can be utilised optimally. In this way, the production plate (34) can be made either shorter, if the product is not wanted long, due to e.g. a standard for the block, thereby reducing the hardening area or allowing more production plates (34) in the hardening area, or if the product (36) is not included in any product standard, elongate the product (36) corresponding to the saved space, thus utilising the production plate (34) better.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2005 00800 | Jun 2005 | DK | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DK2006/000289 | 5/26/2006 | WO | 00 | 11/30/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/128458 | 12/7/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1326902 | Atterbury | Jan 1920 | A |
1385186 | Muth | Jul 1921 | A |
1458551 | Seat | Jun 1923 | A |
1471951 | Evans | Oct 1923 | A |
1526667 | Flam | Feb 1925 | A |
1642247 | Krause | Sep 1927 | A |
2048412 | Sissman | Jul 1936 | A |
2081078 | Watson | May 1937 | A |
2232632 | Reynolds | Feb 1941 | A |
2307606 | Steenstrup | Jan 1943 | A |
2340674 | Mallard | Feb 1944 | A |
2348956 | Carney | May 1944 | A |
2370925 | Wade | Mar 1945 | A |
2440582 | Green | Apr 1948 | A |
2459940 | Himmel | Jan 1949 | A |
2522603 | Case | Sep 1950 | A |
2550977 | Dimock | May 1951 | A |
2849869 | Baillif et al. | Sep 1958 | A |
2934916 | Erickson et al. | May 1960 | A |
2983983 | Mayer | May 1961 | A |
3021694 | Bauerlein | Feb 1962 | A |
3163911 | Kenney | Jan 1965 | A |
3171185 | Anderson | Mar 1965 | A |
3327986 | Oury | Jun 1967 | A |
3664630 | Maynen et al. | May 1972 | A |
3802659 | Lebherz | Apr 1974 | A |
3844526 | McCracken | Oct 1974 | A |
3940229 | Hutton | Feb 1976 | A |
4033545 | Duwe et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4050865 | Drostholm et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4181286 | Van Doren | Jan 1980 | A |
4218206 | Mullins | Aug 1980 | A |
4261693 | Rayner et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4525133 | Bergmann | Jun 1985 | A |
4776481 | Kidd | Oct 1988 | A |
5017049 | Sievert | May 1991 | A |
5020769 | Botes | Jun 1991 | A |
5062610 | Woolford et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5198127 | Tilley et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5297772 | Stefanick | Mar 1994 | A |
5372349 | Elmore | Dec 1994 | A |
5445514 | Heitz | Aug 1995 | A |
5542837 | Johnston | Aug 1996 | A |
5589124 | Woolford et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5904798 | Bradford et al. | May 1999 | A |
5939104 | Johnston | Aug 1999 | A |
6007321 | Meckel et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6142713 | Woolford et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6183168 | Woolford et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6312197 | Woolford et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6428726 | Pribyl | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6817857 | Spangenberg et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6892498 | Roman | May 2005 | B1 |
6938382 | Schmitz | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7291306 | Ishler | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7309226 | Hansen et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7497677 | Crian et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7500843 | Crain et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7575217 | Jucha et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7575700 | Ishler | Aug 2009 | B2 |
20020025357 | Spangenberg et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20040245429 | Rasmussen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060134254 | Hansen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060272259 | Ryder | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20090038488 | Hansen et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2555714 | Jun 1977 | DE |
0562209 | Sep 1993 | EP |
WO 2004071732 | Aug 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090127428 A1 | May 2009 | US |