1. Field of the Invention
RF Transmission systems are used to transmit RF signals from point to point, for example, from an antenna to a transceiver or the like. Common forms of RF transmission systems include coaxial cables and striplines.
2. Description of Related Art
Prior coaxial cables typically have a coaxial configuration with a circular outer conductor evenly spaced away from a circular inner conductor by a dielectric support such as polyethylene foam or the like. The electrical properties of the dielectric support and spacing between the inner and outer conductor define a characteristic impedance of the coaxial cable. Circumferential uniformity of the spacing between the inner and outer conductor prevents introduction of impedance discontinuities into the coaxial cable that would otherwise degrade electrical performance.
An industry standard characteristic impedance is 50 ohms. Coaxial cables configured for 50 ohm characteristic impedance generally have an increased inner conductor diameter compared to higher characteristic impedance coaxial cables such that the metal inner conductor material cost is a significant portion of the entire cost of the resulting coaxial cable. To minimize material costs, the inner and outer conductors may be configured as thin metal layers for which structural support is then provided by less expensive materials. For example, commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,800,809, titled “Coaxial Cable and Method of Making Same”, by Moe et al, issued Oct. 5, 2004, hereby incorporated by reference in the entirety, discloses a coaxial cable structure wherein the inner conductor is formed by applying a metallic strip around a cylindrical filler and support structure comprising a cylindrical plastic rod support structure with a foamed dielectric layer therearound. The resulting inner conductor structure has significant materials cost and weight savings compared to coaxial cables utilizing solid metal inner conductors. However, these structures can incur additional manufacturing costs, due to the multiple additional manufacturing steps required to sequentially apply each layer of the structure.
One limitation with respect to metal conductors and/or structural supports replacing solid metal conductors is bend radius. Generally, a larger diameter coaxial cable will have a reduced bend radius before the coaxial cable is distorted and/or buckled by bending. In particular, structures may buckle and/or be displaced out of coaxial alignment by cable bending in excess of the allowed bend radius, resulting in cable collapse and/or degraded electrical performance.
A further cable consideration is supporting and securing the cable along its length, for example as the cable is routed and secured along a radio tower. Prior cables configured for hanging in the air, such as telephone and/or CATV cables between utility poles and a residence, have been configured with encapsulated messenger wires to increase the strength of the cable and/or provide a sturdy attachment point separate from the signal conductor portion of the cable. Thereby, the cable strength is improved and the cable may be secured with reduced risk of damage to the signal conductor portion of the cable. However, messenger wires may increase the materials cost and overall weight of the cable.
A stripline is a flat conductor sandwiched between parallel interconnected ground planes. Striplines have the advantage of being non-dispersive and may be utilized for transmitting high frequency RF signals. Striplines may be cost effectively generated using printed circuit board technology or the like. However, striplines may be expensive to manufacture in longer lengths/larger dimensions. Further, where a solid stacked printed circuit board type stripline structure is not utilized, the conductor sandwich is generally not self supporting and/or aligning, compared to a coaxial cable, and as such may require significant additional support/reinforcing structure.
Competition within the RF cable industry has focused attention upon reducing materials and manufacturing costs, electrical characteristic uniformity, defect reduction, installation simplification and overall improved manufacturing quality control.
Therefore, it is an object of the invention to provide a coaxial cable and method of manufacture that overcomes deficiencies in such prior art.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with a general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention. Like reference numbers in the drawing figures refer to the same feature or element and may not be described in detail for every drawing figure in which they appear.
The inventors have recognized that the prior accepted coaxial cable design paradigm of concentric circular cross-section design geometries results in unnecessarily large coaxial cables with reduced bend radius, excess metal material costs and/or significant additional manufacturing process requirements.
The inventors have further recognized that the application of a flat inner conductor, compared to a conventional circular inner conductor configuration, enables modification of the coaxial cable to improve a thermal dissipation characteristic of the cable with a reduced trade-off in electrical and/or mechanical performance.
An exemplary stripline RF transmission cable 1 is demonstrated in
The dimensions/curvature of the edge sections 20 may be selected, for example, for ease of manufacture. Preferably, the edge sections 20 and any transition thereto from the top and bottom sections 10, 15 is generally smooth, without sharp angles or edges. As best shown in
The desired spacing between the inner conductor 5 and the outer conductor 25 may be obtained with high levels of precision via application of a uniformly dimensioned spacer structure with dielectric properties, referred to as the dielectric layer 30, and then surrounding the dielectric layer 30 with the outer conductor 25. Thereby, the cable 1 may be provided in essentially unlimited continuous lengths with a uniform cross-section at any point along the cable 1.
The inner conductor 5 metallic strip may be formed as solid rolled metal material such as copper, aluminum, steel or the like. For additional strength and/or cost efficiency, the inner conductor 5 may be provided as copper-coated aluminum or copper-coated steel.
Alternatively, the inner conductor 5 may be provided as a substrate 40 such as a polymer and/or fiber strip that is metal coated or metalized, for example as shown in
The dielectric layer 30 may be applied as a continuous wall of plastic dielectric material around the outer surface of the inner conductor 5. The dielectric layer 30 may be a low loss dielectric material comprising a suitable plastic such as polyethylene, polypropylene, and/or polystyrene. The dielectric material may be of an expanded cellular foam composition, and in particular, a closed cell foam composition for resistance to moisture transmission. Any cells of the cellular foam composition may be uniform in size. One suitable foam dielectric material is an expanded high density polyethylene polymer as disclosed in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 4,104,481, titled “Coaxial Cable with Improved Properties and Process of Making Same” by Wilkenloh et al, issued Aug. 1, 1978, hereby incorporated by reference in the entirety. Additionally, expanded blends of high and low density polyethylene may be applied as the foam dielectric.
Although the dielectric layer 30 generally consists of a uniform layer of foam material, as described in greater detail herein below, the dielectric layer 30 can have a gradient or graduated density varied across the dielectric layer cross-section such that the density of the dielectric increases and/or decreases radially from the inner conductor 5 to the outer diameter of the dielectric layer 30, either in a continuous or a step-wise fashion. Alternatively, the dielectric layer 30 may be applied in a sandwich configuration as two or more separate layers together forming the entirety of the dielectric layer 30 surrounding the inner conductor 5.
The dielectric layer 30 may be bonded to the inner conductor 5 by a thin layer of adhesive. Additionally, a thin solid polymer layer and another thin adhesive layer may be present, protecting the outer surface of the inner conductor 5 (for example, as it is collected on reels during cable manufacture processing).
The outer conductor 25 is electrically continuous, entirely surrounding the circumference of the dielectric layer 30 to eliminate radiation and/or entry of interfering electrical signals. The outer conductor 25 may be a solid material such as aluminum or copper material sealed around the dielectric layer as a contiguous portion by seam welding or the like. Alternatively, helically wrapped and/or overlapping folded configurations utilizing, for example, metal foil and/or braided type outer conductor 25 may also be utilized.
If desired, a protective jacket 35 of polymer materials such as polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polyurethane and/or rubbers may be applied to the outer diameter of the outer conductor. The jacket 35 may comprise laminated multiple jacket layers to improve toughness, strippability, burn resistance, the reduction of smoke generation, ultraviolet and weatherability resistance, protection against rodent gnaw-through, strength resistance, chemical resistance and/or cut-through resistance. For ease of installation, an attachment feature 75 may be provided integrated with the jacket 35.
The flattened characteristic of the cable 1 has inherent bend radius advantages. As best shown in
Electrical modeling of stripline-type RF cable structures with top and bottom sections with a width similar to that of the inner conductor (as shown in
To obtain the materials and structural benefits of the stripline RF transmission cable 1 as described herein, the electric field strength and corresponding current density may be balanced by increasing the current density proximate the mid-section 7 of the inner conductor 5. The current density may be balanced, for example, by modifying the dielectric constant of the dielectric layer 30 to provide an average dielectric constant that is lower between the inner conductor edges 3 and the respective adjacent edge sections 20 than between a mid-section 7 of the inner conductor 5 and the top and the bottom sections 10,15. Thereby, the resulting current density may be adjusted to be more evenly distributed across the cable cross-section to reduce attenuation.
The dielectric layer 30 may be formed with layers of, for example, expanded open and/or closed-cell foam dielectric material, where the different layers of the dielectric material have a varied dielectric constant. The differential between dielectric constants and the amount of space within the dielectric layer 30 allocated to each type of material may be utilized to obtain the desired average dielectric constant of the dielectric layer 30 in each region of the cross-section of the cable 1.
As shown for example in
Air may be utilized as a low cost dielectric material. As shown for example in
As shown for example in
The materials selected for the dielectric layer 30, in addition to providing varying dielectric constants for tuning the dielectric layer cross-section dielectric profile for attenuation reduction, may also be selected to enhance structural characteristics of the resulting cable 1. For example, as shown in
Alternatively and/or additionally, the electric field strength and corresponding current density may also be balanced by adjusting the distance between the outer conductor 25 and the mid-section 7 of the inner conductor 5. For example, as shown in
The dimensions may also be modified, for example as shown in
The attachment feature 75 may be formed as an extension of the jacket 35, for example as shown in
The fin 80 may be provided extending from the cable 1 coplanar with the top or bottom sections 10, 15, as shown for example in
Alternatively, the fin 80 may be arranged, for example as shown in
The strength characteristics of the fin 80 may be configured, for example, by selecting the jacket 35 material and/or the dimensions of the fin 80, including a thickness of the fin 80. Further, the fin 80 may be reinforced by application of a reinforcing layer 90 to the fin 80 as a single layer (
The attachment feature 75 may be provided, for example as shown in
Alternatively, the male and female portions 92, 94 may be provided periodically along the longitudinal extent, for example as shown in
In further embodiments, the attachment feature 75 may be provided as a longitudinally periodic attachment to the cable 1 that is then encapsulated by the application of the jacket 35 around both the outer conductor and at least a base portion of the attachment feature 75. For example, the attachment feature 75 may be provided as a clip with a male protrusion configured for direct mating with a standard attachment point, such as a three quarter inch hole often provided on tower structures for “snap-in” type cable hangers. Because of the non-circular cross-section of the cable 1, the clip portion of the attachment feature may anchor upon the cable without requiring additional anti-rotation structure or reinforcement.
One skilled in the art will appreciate that the cable 1 has numerous advantages over a conventional circular cross-section coaxial cable. Because the desired inner conductor surface area is obtained without applying a solid or hollow tubular inner conductor, a metal material reduction of one half or more may be obtained. Alternatively, because complex inner conductor structures which attempt to substitute the solid cylindrical inner conductor with a metal coated inner conductor structure are eliminated, required manufacturing process steps may be reduced. The attachment features 75 provided integral with the jacket 35 may simplify installation of the cables 1 and/or enable easy alignment of multiple adjacent cables 1 in close quarters to conserve space. Because the attachment features 75 are integrated with the jacket 35, separate attachment hardware requirements, such as cable hangers, and their respective installation steps, may be eliminated.
Where in the foregoing description reference has been made to ratios, integers or components having known equivalents then such equivalents are herein incorporated as if individually set forth.
While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of the embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus, methods, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departure from the spirit or scope of applicant's general inventive concept. Further, it is to be appreciated that improvements and/or modifications may be made thereto without departing from the scope or spirit of the present invention as defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of commonly owned co-pending U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 13/208,443, titled “Stripline RF Transmission Cable” filed 12 Aug. 2011 by Frank A. Harwath, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application is also a continuation-in-part of commonly owned co-pending U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 13/427,313, titled “Low Attenuation Stripline RF Transmission Cable” filed 22 Mar. 2012 by Frank A. Harwath, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 13/208,443.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
479525 | Perrine | Jul 1892 | A |
960291 | Egner et al. | Jun 1910 | A |
2060913 | Weaver | Nov 1936 | A |
2200776 | Hoover | May 1940 | A |
2267455 | Gerhard | Dec 1941 | A |
2356166 | Royal et al. | Aug 1944 | A |
2847499 | Peterson | Aug 1958 | A |
2994050 | Ayer et al. | Jul 1961 | A |
3258724 | Walsh et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
3297814 | McClean et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3328510 | White | Jun 1967 | A |
3532783 | Pusey et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3586757 | Haldeman et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3757029 | Marshall | Sep 1973 | A |
4216351 | Brandeau | Aug 1980 | A |
4219928 | Kuo | Sep 1980 | A |
4382236 | Suzuki | May 1983 | A |
4397435 | Fisher et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4441088 | Anderson | Apr 1984 | A |
4490690 | Suzuki | Dec 1984 | A |
4816618 | Bongianni | Mar 1989 | A |
5021007 | Viaud | Jun 1991 | A |
5065122 | Juskey et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5068632 | Champeau | Nov 1991 | A |
5393933 | Goertz | Feb 1995 | A |
5569876 | Podgorski | Oct 1996 | A |
5713415 | Bridges | Feb 1998 | A |
5847324 | Farquhar et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5900589 | Brunt | May 1999 | A |
5960144 | Klumps et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6005193 | Markel | Dec 1999 | A |
6055722 | Tighe et al. | May 2000 | A |
6093886 | Bazizi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6188822 | McAlpine et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6225563 | Poulsen | May 2001 | B1 |
6356690 | McAlpine et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6422893 | Caldwell | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6501350 | Lester | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6545223 | Baldock | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6563990 | Hurley et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6608256 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6653570 | Elrod | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6928217 | Mohler et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7034229 | Victor | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7106931 | Sutehall et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7170008 | Victor | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173190 | Bothe et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184634 | Hurley et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7220332 | Curro et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7304246 | Huffman | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7388155 | Forbes | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7482535 | Sexton et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7482540 | Shukushima et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7737358 | Hopkinson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7737359 | Sexton et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7902456 | Witthoft et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20010015282 | Scantlebury | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20050139379 | Bothe et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20100212934 | Sexton | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20120043117 | Kato et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
08182160 | Jul 1996 | JP |
2001-085805 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-313444 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2004-152963 | May 2004 | JP |
2003052114 | Feb 2013 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Tae Hoon Kim, International Search Report of Counterpart International Application No. PCT/US12/50350, Feb. 28, 2013, Daejeon Metropolitan City, Korea. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130038411 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13427313 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 13570897 | US | |
Parent | 13208443 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 13427313 | US |