The present invention relates to gaming machines, and more particularly to gaming vouchers output from gaming machines.
Slot machines with cashless (coinless) capabilities have been widely introduced throughout the casino gaming industry. Some slot machines output only gaming vouchers (also referred to as “ticket vouchers”) in lieu of cash, whereas other slot machines output coins and/or gaming vouchers, depending upon the patron's request and/or the algorithms programmed into the slot machines. The gaming vouchers may be redeemed for cash, or may be fed back into a special slot machine gaming voucher acceptor or even a specially adapted bill validator to establish credit for subsequent game play.
One widely known cashless slot machine system is called EZ Pay™ Ticket System, available from International Game Technology, Reno, Nev. The EZ Pay system is generally described in U.S. Published application No. 2001/0044337 (Rowe et al.), incorporated herein by reference. Each gaming voucher in the EZ Pay system contains a unique identification number (serial number) which is physically applied to the gaming voucher as a bar code.
When an EZ Pay gaming voucher is generated by a gaming machine, a record is simultaneously created in a remote database that correlates to the gaming voucher. The remote database contains all of the necessary information about the gaming voucher to ensure proper accounting of gaming machine payouts and to allow for accurate gaming voucher redemptions. The information that may be included in the remote database for each voucher includes:
1. monetary value of gaming voucher
2. gaming machine (i.e., asset) that produced the gaming voucher
3. date and time of issuance of the gaming voucher
4. redemption status of the gaming voucher (i.e., redeemed, not yet redeemed)
When a patron presents a gaming voucher for redemption, either by feeding it into a gaming voucher acceptor or bill validator at a gaming machine, or presenting it at a cash window (e.g., casino cage) or other authorized paying entity, the monetary value printed on the gaming voucher is not relied upon as the actual value of the gaming voucher. Instead, the bar code of the gaming voucher is read by a bar code scanner and the information in the remote database is used to obtain the value of the gaming voucher and to determine if the gaming voucher has been previously redeemed. The information in the remote database is also used in other ways to check the likely authenticity of the gaming voucher. For example, the machine number that generated the gaming voucher and time/date values may be checked against other information in the remote database to determine if the ticket is authentic. These extra security measures reduce the likelihood of fraud in the printing and redemption of gaming vouchers.
Notwithstanding the relatively simple redemption process used in cashless systems, such as EZ Pay, there are still unmet needs associated with such systems, and casino operators still face numerous problems with such systems, some of which are outlined below:
1. There is no way to independently account for the gaming vouchers without accessing the gaming voucher redemption system that ties into the remote database.
2. Casinos are required by regulations to count all revenue producing documents without allowing any of the collected information to go outside of the room where the count is taking place. Accessing the gaming voucher redemption system may require electronic transmissions to occur in and out of the count room. (A count room is a secure room where drop boxes and slot cash storage boxes are opened and cash is counted. Gaming vouchers, such as EZ Pay gaming vouchers, that are redeemed by being fed back into a gaming voucher acceptor or bill validator at a gaming machine end up in a drop box or slot cash storage box.)
3. Casino accounting systems and/or count rooms may not have access to the gaming voucher redemption system.
4. Counting equipment runs significantly slower when access to a database identifying each gaming voucher is required.
5. The count room must identify the asset number of the gaming machine that produced each gaming voucher. This information is stored in the remote database and may not be printed on a gaming voucher in either human readable or machine readable form. Accordingly, access to the remote database of the gaming voucher redemption system may be required to obtain this information. As noted above, such access may not be available, or may even be prohibited by regulations.
6. A convention gaming voucher, such as an EZ Pay gaming voucher, may indicate the value and asset number of the gaming that produced the gaming voucher in human readable form. However, it is easy for casino patrons and/or casino employees to fraudulently alter human readable indicia. If access to the gaming voucher redemption system is not available in the count room, the human readable indicia will be relied upon in the count room and such alterations will not be detected during the counting process.
7. Gaming voucher acceptors or bill validators at gaming machines, as well as cage window attendants, have access to the remote database of the gaming voucher redemption system so that the value and authenticity of gaming vouchers presented for redemption can be verified. Nonetheless, it may still be possible to defeat present security measures designed to ensure that gaming vouchers are not fraudulently created and/or redeemed.
The present invention addresses these problems and unmet needs.
A second machine readable indicia, such as a secondary bar code, is printed on the gaming voucher which contains at least the following information coded therein:
1. Identification of the asset that produced that gaming voucher.
2. Amount or value of the gaming voucher.
3. Identification code that associates the physical gaming voucher to the EZ Pay serial number represented by the conventionally printed EZ Pay bar code. In one example, the identification code is a portion of the EZ Pay serial number, such as the last two digits.
The second machine readable indicia allows count room employees to use machine readable scanning equipment, such as a bar code reader, identify the asset that produced the gaming voucher and the value of the gaming voucher. Count room employees thus do not need to rely upon tamper-prone human readable indicia, if any exists on such gaming vouchers, for such information. Furthermore, the identification code portion of the second machine readable indicia allows the count room employees to verify the integrity of the gaming voucher without requiring any communication with the EZ Pay gaming voucher redemption system. That is, the gaming voucher becomes “self-verifying.” This process provides a higher level of security than existing verification procedures for EZ Pay gaming vouchers because the EZ Pay serial number does not become exposed during the count process to any systems external to the count room.
In addition to providing improved count room procedures, the second machine readable indicia increases the integrity of the process for redeeming gaming vouchers via gaming voucher acceptors or bill validators at gaming machines, or at cage windows. During such redemptions, the remote database of the gaming voucher redemption system is accessed so that the value and authenticity of gaming vouchers presented for redemption can be verified. However, if the security measures associated with the conventional EZ Pay serial number and associated remote database information were defeated, the second machine readable indicia provides an additional source of verification. For example, the asset number, gaming voucher value, and identification code of the EZ Pay serial number, as obtained from the second machine readable indicia, may be compared to the information obtained by scanning the conventional EZ Pay bar code (which is a unique serial number) and accessing the corresponding database record for the serial number which contains the asset number and value of the gaming voucher.
During either count room processing or redemption at cage windows, human readable indicia may also be used as a further check against fraudulent redemptions. For example, gaming vouchers typically include the value of the gaming voucher in human readable form for the convenience of the patron. However, one object of the present invention is to reduce or eliminate the necessity to rely upon such human readable indicia when redeeming gaming vouchers.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings embodiments which are presently preferred. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
In the drawings:
Certain terminology is used herein for convenience only and is not to be taken as a limitation on the present invention. In the drawings, the same reference letters are employed for designating the same elements throughout the several figures.
The bar code symbol in one embodiment of the EZ Pay gaming voucher is a USS-I 2/5 type bar code.
If the gaming voucher 10 has a magnetic strip, then the first machine readable indicia will be the unique gaming voucher number encoded onto the magnetic strip. In this example, there may not be any human readable value printed on the gaming voucher 10.
1. monetary value of gaming voucher
2. gaming machine (i.e., asset) that produced the gaming voucher
3. date and time of issuance of the gaming voucher
4. redemption status of the gaming voucher (i.e, redeemed, not yet redeemed)
1. the asset number of the gaming machine that produced the gaming voucher 20
2. the monetary value of the gaming voucher 20
3. a portion of the unique gaming voucher number 12.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the portion of the unique gaming voucher number is the last two digits of the gaming voucher number. However, any portion may be used. The second or top bar code symbol in one embodiment of the gaming voucher 20 is a USS Code 128 bar code symbol.
The gaming voucher 20 may also use one or more magnetic strips in place of the bar codes. If so, then the first machine readable indicia will be the unique gaming voucher number encoded onto the magnetic strip and the second machine readable indicia will be the number represented by the secondary bar code symbol 22. Thus, whether the gaming voucher 20 uses bar codes or magnetic strips, the same information will be contained on the gaming voucher 20. The examples described hereafter refer only to the bar code embodiment. The equipment for printing, scanning and decoding bar codes, and for encoding and decoding magnetic strips is well-known and thus is not described in detail herein.
In addition to the three data items referred to above, the gaming voucher 20 includes additional data items in accordance with internal control procedures described in the Appendix.
An important feature of the present invention is that the secondary bar code symbol 22 allows the gaming voucher 20 to be self-validating when counted in a count room, while also providing additional security against fraud (e.g., counterfeiting) when validating gaming vouchers using data in the gaming voucher redemption system.
The self-validation process 30 begins by reading the two bar codes and extracting and parsing the read data to obtain the unique gaming voucher number from the center bar code symbol 12, and the asset number, monetary value, and portion of the unique gaming voucher number from the secondary bar code 22 (steps 32, 34).
Next, the portion of the unique gaming voucher number extracted from the secondary bar code 22 is compared to the corresponding digits of the entire unique gaming voucher number (step 36). If the numbers match, then the monetary value of the gaming voucher 20 extracted from the secondary bar code 22 is compared to the value printed in human readable form (step 38). If the monetary values match, then the gaming voucher is initially presumed to be valid and counted accordingly (step 40). These two steps may be performed in either order. Also, while it is preferred to perform the monetary value check, this step is optional. If either of these tests fail (step 42), then the gaming voucher must be further investigated. It may be initially counted as being invalid, or handled in accordance with established internal control procedures.
Additional checks may be performed on the gaming vouchers 20 which are not shown in
The redemption process 50 begins by reading the two bar codes and extracting and parsing the read data to obtain the unique gaming voucher number from the center bar code symbol 12, and the asset number, monetary value, and portion of the unique gaming voucher number from the secondary bar code 22 (steps 52, 54). The unique gaming voucher number is then used to access the corresponding record in the remote database (step 56,
The presence of the secondary bar code 22 does not preclude a gaming operator from using the center bar code 12 in the conventional (prior art) manner for gaming voucher redemptions. That is, the secondary bar code 22 may be used only for the count room procedures, and not for independent verification during patron redemption of gaming vouchers 22.
The Appendix includes excerpts of internal control procedures that are used by gaming establishments owned by Park Place Entertainment in the State of New Jersey. The internal control procedures allows the present invention to be implemented in gaming jurisdictions that have established additional requirements for use of EZ Pay gaming vouchers and similar types of gaming vouchers.
The present invention may be implemented with any combination of hardware and software. If implemented as a computer-implemented apparatus, the present invention is implemented using means for performing all of the steps and functions described above.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes could be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the broad inventive concept thereof. It is understood, therefore, that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but it is intended to cover modifications within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
(a) In conjunction with the requirements of N.J.A.C. 19:45-1.36 for a hopper and either a slot drop bucket or slot drop box, Bally's Atlantic City may issue a Gaming Voucher to automatically pay a the amount on a credit meter, which gaming voucher shall be dispensed automatically from a slot machine to a patron, provided that:
(b) Each Gaming Voucher shall be designed and manufactured with sufficient graphics or other security measures, so as to permit to the greatest extent possible, the proper verification of the gaming voucher, and shall contain, the following information:
(c) Each gaming voucher shall be redeemed by a patron for a specific value of cash, coin or slot tokens in the amount of the gaming voucher surrendered, gaming voucher credits, or slot tokens, which value shall not exceed $3,000. Bally's Park Place and Wild West will not redeem a gaming voucher if:
(d) Park Place and Wild West shall follow a system of internal controls for the issuance and redemption of gaming vouchers, as follows:
Each EZ Pay slot machine is connected to a Clerk Validation Terminal (CVT). The slot machine communicates to the CVT using the IGT Slot Accounting System (SAS) protocol. Up to 50 slot machines communicate with one CVT through a daisy chained fiber optic loop. The CVT in turn communicates with a Front End Processor (CFE) and the Front End Processor in turn communicates with the EZ Pay server (XVU). From the server, a network of cashier, auditor, Soft Count, and administration computers are connected.
When an EZ Pay slot machine prints a gaming voucher, the information is delivered to the CVT and redundantly stored in the CVT's battery backed memory. Approximately 19,000 unpaid gaming vouchers can exist in the CVT at one time. If the CVT is approaching 19,000 unpaid gaming vouchers the CVT sends the information from the oldest gaming voucher to the XVU. These tickets can then only be redeemed by a cashier. Paid voucher transactions are stored only in the system XVU and are purged from the CVT. The following information is printed by the slot machine and sent to the CVT using the SAS protocol as explained further in Section 1.55(d) of this submission:
The CVT sends the information detailed above to the Digi Etherlite (terminal server) and the Digi Etherlite sends the information to the XUV. The XUV is used to cross validate gaming voucher information sent from the slot machines and CVT's. The role of the CVT, Digi Etherlite, CFE and XUV are explained in exhibit M to section 1.55 of this submission.
When a gaming voucher is inserted in a slot machines bill validator, the bill validator scans the center barcode, and sends the validation number to the slot machine, which in turn sends the validation number to the CVT. The CVT sends the validation number to the Digi Etherlite, the Digi Etherlite sends the information to the XVU and issuing CVT. The XVU makes the decision to redeem the gaming voucher based on a comparison of information contained in the SQL database and the issuing CVT. If the gaming voucher is valid the XVU sends the validation number and the value of the gaining voucher to the CFE and the CEE sends the information to the redeeming CVT When the redeeming CVT authorizes the slot machine to accept the gaming voucher, the slot machine will receive the amount from the redeeming CVT, direct the bill acceptor to stack the voucher, and then post the credits to the credit meter. The entire amount of the gaming voucher is sent to the slot machine. The slot machine will determine if the credit amount is not evenly divisible by the slot machine's denomination, the slot machine will accept the transfer amount and immediately issue a ticket for the fractional credit balance. (For example, a ticket in the amount of $49.95 is accepted by a slot machine that is a quarter denomination, the machine will credit $49.75 to the credit meter and issue a ticket for $.20 to the player.)
If the gaming voucher is not valid only the validation number is sent (not the value) and the gaming voucher is rejected and credits are not posted to the slot machine.
For gaming vouchers redeemed by a slot cashier, the slot cashier will scan or manually enter the sequence number (validation #) from the center bar code into an IGT Ticket Validation Cashier Station Terminal. The terminal is connected to the XVU, via network. For details on the communication and type of network refer to exhibit M to 1.55 of this submission.
The Ticket Validation Cashier Station sends the validation number to the XVU and issuing CVT. If the gaming voucher is valid the XVU sends the validation number and the value of the gaming voucher to the Ticket Validation Cashier Station. Detail procedures for the redemption of gaming vouchers by slot cashiers are detailed in 1.35C of this submission.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4157829 | Goldman et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4494197 | Troy et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4591190 | Clark | May 1986 | A |
5444750 | Stewart et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5475205 | Behm et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5791990 | Schroeder et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5935000 | Sanchez et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938200 | Markowicz et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6048269 | Burns et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6110044 | Stern | Aug 2000 | A |
6111953 | Walker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6170744 | Lee et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212504 | Hayosh | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6347794 | Scrymgeour et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6500067 | Luciano et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505179 | Kara | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6652380 | Luciano | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6679775 | Luciano et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6834794 | Dabrowski | Dec 2004 | B1 |
20010044337 | Rowe et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020128059 | Baltz et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030008707 | Walker et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030042317 | Behn et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030057269 | Brunner | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030062242 | Hallowell et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030073495 | D'Amico et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078094 | Gatto et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030141359 | Dymovsky et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030162591 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040016797 | Jones et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040058728 A1 | Mar 2004 | US |