The present invention relates to Query and Response information retrieval systems and, more particularly, to such systems capable of receiving a user entered question, processing the data representing the question, searching local and/or web based databases for information relevant to an answer to user's query, and conveying such answer information to the user.
Systems of this general type are known that enable a user to access a preprocessed database of predetermined standard answers to a predetermined set of user queries. The standard system responds to a user-entered query by processing the query to determine one or a combination of key words. The system includes a look-up table to determine which predetermined, stored standard answer or answers have the key word or combination of key words may be responsive to the query. The system activates a link to the predetermined, stored answer (sentence) that includes the matched key word(s) between the user query and the look-up table.
Such known systems are quite limited in the scope or subject matter of the queries that the system can properly process. For example, if user query comprises words that lack all the key words pre-stored in the look-up table, then the system cannot respond with any stored answer or it may respond with an incorrect prestored answer. Also, the known systems are limited to a particular subject matter, such as shareholder inquiries of a particular stock company, in order to focus the queries on more likely pre-stored key words.
Accordingly, there is a need for a system that does not rely on pre-stored key work matching and that can process the user query to gain an understanding of information or concepts requested, then searching preprocessed and knowledge bases of storing candidate concepts with links to databases of full documents in which such concepts appear. In addition, there is a need for such a system that can dynamically search all databases of stored documents on the World Wide Web for concept(s) in the user query, downloads candidate documents, processes them dynamically to determine if the downloaded document contains an answer to the query. If it does, then extracting the answer and presenting it to the user and adding the query, answer, and document link to the answer database.
The present invention relates to a system to enable a user to ask a question (query) and for providing the user with one or more answers or solutions to such question. Since the system according to the principles of the present invention processes a query and generates answers employs the same methods regardless of the query format (X-A-O), (S-X-X), (S-X-O), or (S-A-X), where “X” is the absence of an element, and responds with answers in preferably (S-A-O) format, only the processing of query format (X-A-O) will be described in detail below but it will be understood that such processing applies to the other query formats as well.
The present system includes software for processing such query into, EG, Action-Object (A-O) format and includes a knowledge base or database into which a plurality of documents or other information have been or shall be semantically processed which knowledge base or database associates a plurality of solutions or subjects (S's) in association with specific A-O's as well as links for each A-O to the source document in which the A-O appears. The database can be server resident and in response to a user A-O query, transmits to the user some or all of the solutions stored in association with the specific A-O query. If no solutions (S's) reside in the database, the system searches the web for available web data, finds one or more entries (hereafter “documents”) with relevant S-A-O, updates the database by storing the query A-O and particular S in association with the stored query A-O along with a link to the source document and transmits the answer (S) or answers (S1, S2, . . . ) to the user. Preferably, as seen in the word examples below, the answers are conveyed in S-A-O format for the user's convenience and reminding user of the query user submitted, particularly since the Web search may take a few minutes and the system calls the user back with an answer a described below.
In addition to user being able to use user's PC keyboard or mouse to initiate a query, a key feature of exemplary embodiments according to the principles of the present invention, enables user to use an ordinary telephone or cellular phone to access and query the system verbally and to receive an audio or visual display response containing the answer or solution.
An alternate feature of an alternate embodiment includes including in the user telephone or cellular phone a micro chip bearing software that converts voice to digital text, processes the query into A-O format, accesses the database server via the web, receives the solutions or answers from the web based server, converts it from text to synthesized voice or visual display data for user perception at users hand unit.
Other and further objects, benefits, and features shall become apparent with the following detailed description and drawings.
One example of a Semantic Answering System (SAS) according to the principles of the present invention includes voice-to-text transformation device or/and software system, client software module, a server storing the knowledge base or database of semantically created answers.
A user asks a question by voice, using microphone or telephone; the sound is transformed into text by software or special semantic chip, which is able to recognize the question. For example, the user asks, “How can I reduce cholesterol?” Text-to-voice device or software transforms sound into a text file as a query. One exemplary method of achieving this is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/815,260 filed Mar. 22, 2001. The Client software module adds URL to the query; URL/query is sent over the World Wide Web to the Server, which contains the knowledge base of semantic index in Subject-Action-Object format.
Assume the following are stored in the index:
The server searches the database for (Ss) answers which match the query, EG, (A-O) and transmits them in HTML format over the Internet back to client software module, where A-O and answers (S1 and S2) are transformed into text files. Text files are transformed into voice by text-to-voice device or/and software system such as digital computer.
Alternately, if there is no answer in the database to the user query (A-O), semantic indexing engine processes the Web to find and retrieve relevant documents, then creates subject-action-object entries index and sends the index entries over the Internet.
User asks a question to a microphone 1.
The software or the hardware-level apparatus 2 converts the voice data stream into a plain text. Alternatively, user with the aid of keyboard, scanner, or other input device 3 may enter plain text. Problem statement is extracted from the plain text. The format of the problem statement is Action-Object (A-O). Client software 4 codes the Problem statement as parameter of the URL query.
URL Query 5 is sent over the World Wide Web to the Semantic Server.
The Semantic Server 6 searches for the available solutions in the semantic database. One example of a Semantic S-A-O processing method is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/541,182 filed Apr. 3, 2000. If solutions (answers) exist, they are returned in HTML format. The representation of the solutions is basically Subject-Action-Object (S-A-O). If solution is not found in the Semantic Database 7, additional search on the WWW is performed. User will be later notified about the results. The search can be performed on a regular basis to accommodate the changes of the Internet.
The solutions are filtered by server 6 or the user PC or device and can be stored on the User PC. The links to the source documents can be stored in the Semantic database or client PC, as well. User can be notified by email that there are new solutions to his (her) problems in the Semantic Database.
Text-to-Voice module 1 generates the audio stream from the filtered solutions.
User listens to the answers in sequential order to the user's query.
On the whole, the SAS 10 delivers the answers to the user's questions. Answers can also be visually displayed or printed out as desired by user's PC.
If the current database does not contain solutions to the user's problem, the Semantic Server performs a Web search. The results are converted to the Subject-Action-Object format. The components of the semantic database index are updated. The user may be notified about solution availability by, but not limited to, one of the following methods:
The solutions for the user problems are found in the Semantic Database.
Step No. 1 SAS:
Step No. 2 User:
Step No. 3 SAS:
Step No. 4 SAS:
Step No. 5 User:
Step No. 6 SAS:
The solutions for the user problems are not found in the Semantic Database.
Step No. 1 SAS:
Step No. 2 User:
Step No. 3 SAS:
Step No. 4 SAS:
Step No. 5 User:
Step No. 6 SAS:
Step No. 7 SAS continues to search for solutions. The solutions for the user problem later appear available in the Semantic Database.
SAS calls to the user:
Step No. 8 SAS:
As mentioned above, the SAS can handle different types of formatted queries. For example, each of the following would respond to user as above.
Different Types of Formatted Questions
(S-A-X) query format
(S-X-X) query format
(S-X-O) query format
An alternate embodiment is shown in
Possible Applications
Semantic chip for mobile and other devices.
This chip delivers the following functionality:
Whenever each user asks the SAS a new question or new solutions to old questions appear in the Semantic Server, the server adds them to the Semantic database. As Semantic Database grows and stores more and more content S-A-O's, the probability of the available solution increases over time.
Semantic Updating or News Networks
Original user is interested in the specific problem A-O. After initially serving the original user, the Semantic Server continues to track the appearance of any new S-A-O solutions that did not exist in the database before the original user was served. This updating happens either on a regular basis or during processing the relevant A-O queries of other users. The original user is automatically informed that the new solution is available.
For details of suitable semantic processing systems and the S-A-O format, see U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/321,804, filed May 27, 1999 and 09/541,182, filed Apr. 3, 2000, and the Knowledgist® Software and COBRAIN® Software marketed by Invention Machine Corporation of Boston, Mass. and used to support Invention Machine's website www.cobrain.com. See also U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/815,260, filed Mar. 22, 2001 for further SAO processing, query recognition, and expanded SAO query search capabilities.
Various improvements and modifications can be made to the herein disclosed exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention.
This is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/815,260 filed Mar. 22, 2001 now abandoned entitled NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING AND QUERY DRIVEN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, which is a continuing application of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/198,782 filed Apr. 20, 2000. This is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/249,610 filed Nov. 17, 2000. Benefits of priorities to all related applications are claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4688195 | Thompson et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4829423 | Tennant et al. | May 1989 | A |
4864502 | Kucera et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4868750 | Kucera et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4887212 | Zamora et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5060155 | van Zuilen | Oct 1991 | A |
5146405 | Church | Sep 1992 | A |
5146406 | Jensen | Sep 1992 | A |
5237502 | White et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5331556 | Black, Jr. et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5369575 | Lamberti et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5377103 | Lamberti et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5394509 | Winston | Feb 1995 | A |
5404295 | Katz et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5418948 | Turtle | May 1995 | A |
5424947 | Nagao et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5488725 | Turtle | Jan 1996 | A |
5519608 | Kupie | May 1996 | A |
5559940 | Hutson | Sep 1996 | A |
5614899 | Tokuda et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5630121 | Braden-Harder et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634051 | Thompson | May 1997 | A |
5642502 | Driscoll | Jun 1997 | A |
5694592 | Driscoll | Dec 1997 | A |
5696916 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5696962 | Kupie | Dec 1997 | A |
5724571 | Woods | Mar 1998 | A |
5748974 | Johnson | May 1998 | A |
5761497 | Holt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774833 | Newman | Jun 1998 | A |
5794050 | Dahlgen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799268 | Boguraev | Aug 1998 | A |
5802493 | Sheflott et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802504 | Suda et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5844798 | Uramoto | Dec 1998 | A |
5855002 | Armstrong | Dec 1998 | A |
5873056 | Liddy et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873076 | Barr et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878385 | Bralich et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884302 | Ho | Mar 1999 | A |
5893104 | Srinivasan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895464 | Bhandari et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5933822 | Braden-Harder et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5963940 | Liddy et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966686 | Heidorn et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5995922 | Penterouodakis et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026388 | Liddy et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038560 | Wical | Mar 2000 | A |
6076051 | Messerly et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6101492 | Jacquemin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6167370 | Tsourikov et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173279 | Levin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6246977 | Messerly et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263335 | Paik et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269356 | Hatton | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6393428 | Miller et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6442566 | Atman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6609091 | Budzinski | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6618715 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6901399 | Corston et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7120574 | Troyanova et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20010039490 | Verbitsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049688 | Fratkina et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20050055385 | Sinha et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060167931 | Bobick et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060242195 | Bove et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070006177 | Aiber et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070050393 | Vogel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020116176 A1 | Aug 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60249610 | Nov 2000 | US | |
60198782 | Apr 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09815260 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 09991079 | US |