This nonprovisional application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a) on Patent Application No. 0301646-6 filed in Sweden on Jun. 4, 2003, the entirety of which is herein incorporated by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a semi-submersible offshore vessel of a type used for deep water offshore operations such as oil and gas exploration, drilling and production. The invention introduces a novel way of minimizing motions, and primarily the vertical motions of the vessel, in order to reduce metal fatigue in—for example—riser pipe structures. The vessel exhibits a substantially rectangular ring-pontoon, at least four support columns and an upper deck structure positioned upon said support columns. The offshore vessel may for example be provided with hydrocarbon processing equipment and/or accommodation quarters.
2. Description of the Background Art
In deep water offshore operations such as oil and gas (hydrocarbon) exploration, drilling and production, a semi-submersible offshore vessel of the type described above, is connected to sub-sea wellheads and other installations via a system of several so called riser pipes. However, Applicants have determined that the background art suffers from the following disadvantages.
Drilling operations as well as seabed-to-surface transportation of hydrocarbons (referred to as “production”) are effected through such riser pipes. Since these vessels often operate at considerable depths, the riser pipes of considerable length—often several thousand meters long—are used. Production riser pipes are often made of steel, so called Steel Catenary Risers (SCR), and are sensitive to metal fatigue as the pipes are subjected to forces and motions caused primarily by the wave excited vertical motions of the semi-submersible offshore vessel.
Several designs adapted to primarily minimize vertical motions of offshore vessels are previously known. These designs, however, concentrate on minimizing the vertical motion of the vessel in general, the vertical motion generally being the predominant sea-induced motion in deep sea operational areas with long wave period ranges above 10 seconds. The applicants have found that the greatest problems with riser pipe fatigue are encountered at shorter wave period ranges below 7–8 seconds.
The present invention overcomes the shortcomings associated with the background art and achieves other advantages not realized by the background art.
The above mentioned problems are solved b y concentrating the motion reducing measures to one end of the vessel hull, with the objective to locally minimize the vertical motions within the wave period range below 7–8 seconds at this end. In order to do this, both the vertical translation (heave) and the rotation (pitch or roll) multiplied with the lever arm from the center of rotation has to be minimized. The inventive approach is to:
This is achieved by rendering one end of the vessel (below referred to as the second end) rotationally “stiff” by providing the support columns in a second column pair with relatively large water-plane areas, in combination with a relatively slender conFIG.uration of a corresponding second transversal pontoon section, which results in low exciting forces in the vertical direction at the second end compared to the first end of the vessel. The first end, on the other hand, is rendered rotationally “weak” by providing the support columns in the first column pair with relatively small water-plane areas, in combination with a relatively wide conFIG.uration of the first transversal pontoon section—which results in higher exciting forces in the vertical direction at the first end.
The invention thus provides a semi-submersible offshore vessel. The vessel exhibits a first end, for example constituting the forward end of the vessel, and a second end, for example constituting the aft end of the vessel—or vice versa, said vessel comprising: a substantially rectangular ring-pontoon including a first transverse pontoon section located at the first end of the vessel; a second transverse pontoon section located at the second end of the vessel, said second transverse pontoon section being parallel to the first transverse pontoon section, the ring-pontoon further including two mutually parallel longitudinal pontoon sections extending between said first and second end of the vessel; at least four support columns extending upwardly from respective edge-portions of said ring-pontoon, said support columns being arranged in a first column pair located at the first end of the vessel and a second column pair located at the second end of the vessel; an upper deck structure positioned upon said support columns.
The invention is particularly characterized in that the first transverse pontoon section has a vertical mean cross-section area which exceeds the corresponding vertical mean cross-section area of the second transverse pontoon section, and the support columns in the second column pair each has a water-plane area which exceeds the water-plane area of each of the support columns in the first column pair.
In a suitable embodiment, the square root of the water-plane area of the support columns in the first column pair is less than the longitudinal mean width of the first transverse pontoon section.
In one embodiment of the invention, the square root of the water-plane area of the support columns in the second column pair exceeds the longitudinal mean width of the second transverse pontoon section.
In one embodiment, the second transverse pontoon section has an outer side which at least at pontoon top level is aligned with transverse outer sides of the columns in the second column pair, and an inner side which at least at pontoon top level is aligned with a transverse internal bulkhead within said columns in the second column pair.
In a versatile embodiment, the support columns in the first column pair each have a transverse outer side which at least at pontoon top level is aligned with an outer side of the first transverse pontoon section, and a transverse inner side which at least at pontoon top level is aligned with a transverse internal bulkhead within said first transverse pontoon section.
In another embodiment, the support columns in the first column pair each have a transverse outer side which at least at pontoon top level is aligned with a transverse internal bulkhead within said first transverse pontoon section, and a transverse inner side which at least at pontoon top level is aligned with an inner side of the first transverse pontoon section.
Advantageously, the first transverse pontoon section has a vertical mean cross-section area which exceeds the corresponding vertical mean cross-section area of the second transverse pontoon section by a factor of between 1.5 and 4.0, preferably between 2.0 and 3.0.
Suitably, the second transverse pontoon section has a vertical mean cross-section area which exceeds the corresponding vertical mean cross-section area of each of the two longitudinal pontoon sections.
In an advantageous embodiment, the support columns in the second column pair each has a water-plane area which exceeds the water-plane area of each of the support columns in said first column pair by a factor of between 1.3 and 2.5, preferably between 1.5 and 2.0.
In an advantageous embodiment, the support columns are inclined upwardly and substantially radially inwardly from the ring-pontoon to the upper deck structure towards a vertical centerline of the vessel. Preferably, the edge portions of the ring-pontoon each has a horizontal mean cross-section area which equals or exceeds the corresponding water-plane area of the respective support columns.
In one embodiment of the invention, the edge portions of the ring-pontoon include narrowing transition cone elements adapted to bridge differences in cross sectional areas between pontoon sections and the edge portions.
In a favorable embodiment, the second transverse pontoon section has a height which exceeds its width. Suitably, one or more steel catenary riser pipes are attached to said second pontoon section. In one embodiment, a derrick for performing offshore drilling operations may be positioned near the second end of the vessel.
Other features and advantages of the invention will be further described in the following detailed description of embodiments. Further scope of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinafter and the accompanying drawings which are given by way of illustration only, and thus are not limitative of the present invention, and wherein:
The present invention will hereinafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In
The offshore vessel 1 includes a substantially rectangular ring-pontoon 6. The term “ring-pontoon” is here defined as a closed pontoon structure, which encloses a central opening 8. The ring-pontoon 6 includes a first transverse pontoon section 10 located at the first end 2 of the vessel 1, and a second transverse pontoon section 12 located at the second end 4 of the vessel 1. The second transverse pontoon section 12 is parallel to the first transverse pontoon section 11.
Furthermore, the ring-pontoon 6 includes two mutually parallel longitudinal pontoon sections 14 extending between said first end 2 and second end 4 of the vessel 1.
Although the offshore vessel 1 essentially has the general shape of a square, when seen from above (see
In the shown example, four support columns 16, 18, 20, 22 extend upwardly from respective edge-portions 23 of said ring-pontoon 4. The support columns 16, 18, 20, 22 are arranged in a first column pair 24 located at the first end 2 of the vessel 1 and a second column pair 26 located at the second end 4 of the vessel 1. The shown support columns 16, 18, 20, 22 each has a rounded, generally rectangular cross-section shape, but it is to be understood that the support columns 16, 18, 20, 22 may alternatively have other cross sectional shapes, such as for example a generally circular or oval shape.
An upper deck structure 28 is positioned upon said support columns 16, 18, 20, 24. The upper deck structure 28 thus connects the support columns 16, 18, 20, 22 with each other in order to form a globally strong and resilient vessel design.
The upper deck structure 28 of the embodiment shown in
As schematically shown in
The term “mean cross-sectional area” refers to a general mean value of the cross-sectional area along the length of the respective pontoon section or support column with respect to any eventual local deviations from the normal cross-sectional shape.
The term “water-plane area” of the support columns 16, 18, 20, 22 primarily refers to a water-plane area at or about the operational draught of the vessel 1, as illustrated by the horizontal operational draught waterline 34 in
Preferably, the square root of the water-plane area D of the support columns 16, 18 in the first column pair 24 is less than the longitudinal mean width W1 (as indicated in
Furthermore, the square root of the water-plane area E of the support columns 20, 22 in the second column pair 26 exceeds the longitudinal mean width W2 of the second transverse pontoon section 12.
As can be seen in the perspective view of
As seen in the accompanying drawings, the support columns 16, 18, 20, 22 are inclined upwardly and substantially radially inwardly from the ring-pontoon 6 to the upper deck-structure 28 towards a vertical centerline 42 of the vessel 1. More particularly, as shown in the side view of
In both exemplary embodiments, the edge portions 23 of the support columns 16, 18, 20, 22 include narrowing transition cone elements 44 adapted to bridge differences in cross sectional areas between pontoon sections 10, 12, 14 and the edge portions 23. For example, the narrowing transition cone elements 44 are clearly visible in
As is further shown in the
This is achieved by rendering the second end 4 of the vessel 1 rotationally “stiff” by providing the support columns 20, 22 in the second column pair 26 with relatively large water-plane areas E, in combination with a relatively slender conFIG.uration of the second transversal pontoon section 12, which results in low exciting forces in the vertical direction at the second end 4 compared to the first end 2 of the vessel 1. The first end 2, on the other hand, is rendered rotationally “weak” by providing the support columns 16, 18 in the first column pair 24 with relatively small water-plane areas D, in combination with a relatively wide configuration of the first transversal pontoon section 10—which results in higher exciting forces in the vertical direction at the first end 1.
If the vessel 1 is provided with a derrick 52 for performing offshore drilling operations, as shown in
With reference now primarily to the diagrammatical cross-sectional
Furthermore, as seen in a comparison between
As is further apparent from
In an advantageous embodiment, the support columns 20, 22 in the second column pair 26 each has a water-plane area E which exceeds the water-plane area D of each of the support columns 16, 18 in the first column pair 24 by a factor of between 1.3 and 2.5, preferably between 1.5 and 2.0.
In the second exemplary embodiment of the invention, as shown in
As is further shown in
In the second embodiment of
In
In
In this embodiment, the outer side 64 of the first transverse pontoon section 10 extends outside of the otherwise continuous external periphery 78 of the ring-pontoon 6 in such a way that a square step 80 is formed at each end of the first transverse pontoon section 10 in the transition to the edge-portions 23. However, other alternative shapes of this transition may of course also be used within the scope of the invention. Thus, instead of a square step 80, the transition may be rounded or angled.
It is to be understood that the invention is by no means limited to the embodiments described above, and may be varied freely within the scope of the appended claims. For example, the support columns 16, 18, 20, 22 need not necessarily be inclined as in the shown embodiments, but may instead be conventionally extend vertically from the ring-pontoon 6 to the upper deck structure 28.
The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may d in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from t and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious killed in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following
List of Reference Numerals:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0301646 | Jun 2003 | SE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3610193 | Lacy et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3919957 | Ray et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
6503023 | Huang et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
20010026733 | Ludwigson | Oct 2001 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050058513 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |