Semiconductive ceramic compositions with a nonlinear volt-ampere characteristic, and process for preparing coherent bodies of such compositions

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to ceramic materials particularly well suited for use in semiconductor devices having a nonlinear volt-ampere characteristic. The invention also concerns a process for the fabrication of coherent bonded bodies of such materials.
Semiconductor devices with a nonlinear volt-ampere characteristic find extensive use in electric circuits for the absorption of abnormal voltages, suppression of noise, and elimination of sparks. Commonly referred to as varistors, as hereinafter so called in this specification, such semiconductor devices have been fabricated typically from silicon (using the pn-junctions of silicon semicondcutors), silicon carbide (SiC), zinc oxide (ZnO), stannic oxide (SnO.sub.2), and titanium dioxide (TiO.sub.2).
The pn-junction silicon varistors make use of forward voltage rises, so that they offer a varistor voltage of as low as 0.6 volt (V) or so per pn-junction. For higher varistor voltages, therefore, a plurality of pn-junction silicon chips must be interconnected in series. As regards the SiC varistors, the nonlinearity coefficient .alpha. of their volt-ampere characteristic is as low as two or three in a voltage range of 3-20 V. Another disadvantage is that SiC cannot possibly be sintered into annular or other more or less complex shape with sufficient coherency. The ZnO varistors have a high nonlinearity coefficient in a voltage range of over 30 V, but it becomes as low as about two in a low voltage range of 3-20 V. The nonlinearity coefficient of the SnO.sub.2 varistors is higher, being up to about five, in the voltage range of 3-20 V. This advantage is offset, however, by the poor sinterability, expensiveness, and low moisture-withstanding ability of the material. Moreover, since the SnO.sub.2 varistors function as such by making use of the PN-junctions at the interfaces between the electrodes and the semiconductor bodies, their physical properties tend to deteriorate from voltage pulses. The TiO.sub.2 varistors can be molded and sintered into any desired shape, but their nonlinearity coefficient is only two to four in a voltage range of 20-30 V. Additionally, their varistor voltage varies with temperature (temperature characteristic) at a rate ranging from -0.5% to 0.7% per .degree.C., and they are easy to overheat while handling large power.
Another known varistor material being studied is barium titanate (BaTiO.sub.3). The BaTiO.sub.3 varistors utilize the PN-junctions at the interfaces between the electrodes and the semiconductor bodies, just like the SnO.sub.2 varistors, so that they possess drawbacks similar to those pointed out in connection with the SnO.sub.2 varistors.
For the purposes of the absorption of abnormal voltages and the elimination of noise and sparks, the parallel connections of varistors and capacitors have hitherto served better than varistors only, as is well known to the specialists. No ceramic composition having both functions has so far been discovered, as far as the applicant is aware. Such a material will significantly contribute to the miniaturization and cost reduction of electrical equipment.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,933,668 issued to Takahashi et al. on Jan. 20, 1976, describes and claims a ferroelectric ceramic compound in a perovskite structure, composed principally of strontium titanate (SrTiO.sub.3). This known ceramic material is well suited for use in capacitors. The high resistance offered by the particles constituting the ceramic, however, practically inhibits its use in varistors. Another disadvantage of the known SrTiO.sub.3 ceramic is easy deterioration of electrical properties due to voltage pulses
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention seeks to combine both varistor and capacitor functions in a single class of semiconductive ceramic compositions, and to provide such compositions themselves and a process for the fabrication of coherent bonded bodies of such compositions.
The invention also seeks to provide semiconductive ceramic material which are capable of providing such a low range of varistor voltages as, say, from three to 100 V, which are little affected physically by voltage pulses in their use in semiconductor devices, and which, manufactured by the inventive method, hardly fluctuate in electrical properties.
Briefly, the invention provides a semiconductive ceramic composition comprising: (1) from about 90.000 to about 99.989 mole percent SrTiO.sub.3 (hereinafter referred to as the first or main ingredient); (2) from about 0.001 to about 5.000 mole percent of at least one metal oxide (the second ingredient), for improving the semiconductivity of the composition, which is selected from the group of niobium oxide (Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5), tantalum oxide (Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5), tungstic oxide (WO.sub.3), lanthanum oxide (La.sub.2 O.sub.3), ceric oxide (CeO.sub.2), neodymium oxide (Nd.sub.2 O.sub.3), praseodymia (Pr.sub.6 O.sub.11), dysprosium oxide (Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3), yttrium oxide (Y.sub.2 O.sub.3), and samarium oxide (Sm.sub.2 O.sub.3); and (3) from about 0.010 to about 5.000 mole percent of at least one other metal oxide (the third ingredient), for improving the nonlinear volt-ampere characteristic of the composition, which is selected from the group of vanadium pentoxide (V.sub.2 O.sub.5), chromic oxide (Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3), black copper oxide (CuO), red copper oxide (Cu.sub.2 O), molybdenum trioxide (MoO.sub.3), and manganese dioxide (MnO.sub.2).
Hereinafter in this specification and in the claims appended thereto, all percentages are molar unless otherwise specified.
The exact proportion of each of the at least three ingredients of the ceramic composition according to the invention depends on those of the others. Preferably, the main ingredient is used in a range of about 97.7-99.1%, the second ingredient in a range of about 0.3-1.0%, and the third ingredient in a range of about 0.1-0.3%, in proportions.
In the above described ceramic composition according to the invention, the addition of at least one of the third group of ingredients (V.sub.2 O.sub.5, Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3, CuO, Cu.sub.2 O, MoO.sub.3, and MnO.sub.2) to the first and second ingredients serves to give the material a markedly nonlinear volt-ampere characteristic, or voltage-dependent nonlinear resistance. The crystal system of the material is in a ferroelectric perovskite structure, so that it offers a high electrostatic capacitance, making it possible to provide semiconductor devices integrally combining the functions of both varistor and capacitor.
It is reasoned that the ceramic materials formulated in accordance with the invention derive their varistor-like characteristics from the PN-junctions between their constituent particles, with the N-type semiconductor particles of, principally, the first and second ingredients surrounded by the third ingredient of P type or of substantially P type. Consequently, compared with the known varistors having the PN-junctions formed between the ceramic bodies and the electrodes, the varistors incorporating the ceramic materials of this invention will suffer less from voltage pulses. A further advantage of the ceramic compositions according to the invention is the inexpensiveness of their main ingredient, SrTiO.sub.3, making possible the provision of high-quality varistor ceramics at low costs.
According to another aspect of the invention the above compositions of at least three ingredients are admixed with at least one still other metal oxide (hereinafter referred to as the fourth ingredient) with a view to higher coherency of the ceramic bodies prepared from the compositions. The fourth ingredient is selected from the group of germanium dioxide (GeO.sub.2), zinc oxide (ZnO), boric oxide (B.sub.2 O.sub.3), and litharge (PbO). The fourth ingredient serves to make the particles of the sintered ceramic bodies from about 20 to 40 microns in size, and further to improve the voltage rises of their V-I curves and to reduce fluctuations in the nonlinearity coefficient. The proportion of the fourth ingredient, dependent on those of the other ingredients, normally ranges from about 0.010% to about 4.000%, preferably from about 0.5% to about 1.0%. When a ceramic composition contains from about 0.010 to about 4.000% of the fourth ingredient, the amount of the first ingredient is correspondingly reduced to a range of about 86.000-99.979%.
For the fabrication of coherent bonded bodies of the first described composition (having no fourth ingredient) by the method of this invention, SrTiO.sub.3 and at least two selected metal oxides of the prescribed proportions, all in finely divided form, are blended together and admixed with an organic binder. The blended mixture is molded into desired shape, such as that of a disc, at pressures ranging from about 500 to about 2000 kg/cm.sup.2. The molding is first fired in a temperature range of about 1300.degree.-1500.degree. C. in a nonoxidative (i.e., reductive or neutral) atmosphere and then further heated in a temperature range of about 800.degree.-1300.degree. C. in a oxidative atmosphere.
If the composition includes a fourth ingredient or ingredients, the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment of the fired molding is selected from a range of about 900.degree.-1300.degree. C. In other respects, coherent bodies of this four-ingredient composition can be formed by the same method as are those of the three-ingredient composition.
The ceramic bodies manufactured by the methods of this invention are remarkably well suited for varistors, besides being notable for their high abilities of absorbing abnormal voltages in use. Subsequently electroded, the ceramic bodies find use as varistors.
The above and other features and advantages of this invention will become more apparent, and the invention itself will best be understood, from the following description and appended claims taken together with the attached drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic sectional view of a varistor incorporating a ceramic body formulated in accordance with the invention;
FIG. 2 is a graphic representation of the volt-ampere characteristic of an SrTiO.sub.3 -CeO.sub.2 -V.sub.2 O.sub.5 varistor fabricated in EXAMPLE 1 of the invention;
FIG. 3 is a graph representing the degrees of attenuation of various megahertz frequencies by the SrTiO.sub.3 -CeO.sub.2 -V.sub.2 O.sub.5 varistor, in comparison with the attenuation characteristic of a known ZnO varistor, as tested in EXAMPLE 1 of the invention;
FIG. 4 is a graph plotting the curve of the varistor voltage E.sub.10 of SrTiO.sub.3 -Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 -CuO varistors against the varying percentages of their CuO content, with their Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 content fixed at 0.1%, as tested in EXAMPLE 3 of the invention;
FIG. 5 is a graph plotting the curve of the varistor voltage E.sub.10 of SrTiO.sub.3 -Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 -CuO varistors against the varying percentages of their Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 content, with their CuO content fixed at 0.01%, also as tested in Example 3 of the invention;
FIG. 6 is a graph plotting the curve of the volt-ampere nonlinearity coefficient .alpha. of SrTiO.sub.3 -Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 -CuO varistors against the temperatures at which they were subjected to oxidative heat treatment in manufacture, as tested in EXAMPLE 13 of the invention;
FIG. 7 is a graph plotting the curve of the .alpha. of SrTiO.sub.3 -Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 -CuO-GeO.sub.2 varistors against the temperatures at which they were subjected to oxidative heat treatment in manufacture, as tested in EXAMPLE 23 of the invention;
FIG. 8 is a graph plotting the curve of the E.sub.10 of the SrTiO.sub.3 -Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 -CuO-GeO.sub.2 varistors against the temperatures at which they were subjected to oxidative heat treatment in manufacture, in comparison with the curve representing similar relationship in the case of the SrTiO.sub.3 -Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 -CuO varistors, also as tested in EXAMPLE 23 of the invention; and
FIG. 9 is a graph plotting the curves of the rates of change in the E.sub.10 of SrTiO.sub.3 -Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 -CuO-GeO.sub.2 and SrTiO.sub.3 -Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 -MoO.sub.3 -GeO varistors with the temperatures at which they were put to use, as tested in EXAMPLE 25 of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The compositions of the semiconductive ceramic materials according to this invention are as set forth in the foregoing summary of the invention. The fabrication of coherent bonded bodies of such compositions, as in the form of discs for use in varistors, starts with the preparation of SrTiO.sub.3, the main ingredient, which occupies a major proportion in all the possible combinations of ingredients in accordance with the invention. This main ingredient is usually prepared from strontium carbonate (SrCO.sub.3) and titanium dioxide (TiO.sub.2), proportioned to unite into SrTiO.sub.3. SrCO.sub.3 and TiO.sub.2 do so by being fired at temperatures ranging from 1050.degree. to 1200.degree. C. for three hours.
If the composition is to include no fourth ingredient, from about 90.000 to about 99.989% SrTiO.sub.3, prepared as above, is combined with about 0.001-5.000% of at least one metal oxide (second ingredient) selected from the group of Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5, Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5, WO.sub.3, La.sub.2 O.sub.3, CeO.sub.2, Nd.sub.2 O.sub.3, Pr.sub.6 O.sub.11, Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3, Y.sub.2 O.sub.3, and Sm.sub.2 O.sub.3, and with about 0.010-5.000% of at least one other metal oxide (third ingredient) selected from the group of V.sub.2 O.sub.5, CrO.sub.3, CuO, Cu.sub.2 O, MoO.sub.3, and MnO.sub.2. The combination of at least three ingredient is pulverized and intimately intermingled by being placed in a ball mill for 10 hours or so. The blended mixture of finely divided form is then admixed with 5-10 percent by weight of an organic binder, normally polyvinyl alcohol. This admixture is molded into disc-like or other desired shaped by pressing at about 500-2000 kg/cm.sup.2.
Then the moldings are fired in a temperature range of about 1300.degree.-1500.degree. C., preferably about 1350.degree.-1420.degree. C., for 1-6 hours in a nonoxidative atmosphere. The total firing time, inclusive of the time for the buildup and drop of the firing temperature in the furnace, may be from 24 to 48 hours. The firing atmosphere is reductive for the better results, consisting for example of 95 percent by volume of molecular nitrogen (N.sub.2) and five percent by volume of molecular hydrogen (H.sub.2). The fired moldings are put to oxidative heat treatment (reoxidizing treatment), by being heated in a temperature range of about 800.degree.-1300.degree. C., preferably about 800.degree.-1170.degree. C., for 0.5-6.0 hours in an oxidative atmosphere. The total time of such oxidative heat treatment, inclusive of the time for the buildup and drop of the heating temperature in the furnace, may range from four to eight hours. Thus are completed the desired ceramic bodies, which can be put to use as varistors on being electroded, as by silver painting and baking.
In the EXAMPLES of the invention presented subsequently, all but CrO.sub.3 of the listed metal oxides are used as such as starting materials. All that is required for the attainment of the purposes of this invention, however, is that the completed ceramic bodies contain the selected metal oxides. The starting materials may therefore be not necessarily in the form of metal oxides but of, for example, metallic elements, carbonates, hydroxides, oxalates, etc. To give more specific examples, the first ingredient may be formed from starting substances of strontium and titanium; the second ingredient from such starting substances as Nb(Hd.sub.2 O.sub.4).sub.5, La.sub.2 (C.sub.2 O.sub.4).sub.3, La.sub.2 (CO.sub.3).sub.3, Ce.sub.2 (C.sub.3 O.sub.4).sub.3, Ce.sub.2 (CO.sub.3).sub.3, Pr.sub.2 (C.sub.2 O.sub.4).sub.3, Nd.sub.2 (C.sub.2 O.sub.4).sub.3, Nd.sub.2 (CO.sub.3).sub.3, Sm.sub.2 (C.sub.2 O.sub.4).sub.3, Sm.sub.2 (CO.sub.3).sub.3, Dy.sub.2 (C.sub.2 O.sub.4).sub.3, Dy.sub.2 (CO.sub.3).sub.3, and Y.sub.2 (CO.sub.3).sub.3 ; and the third ingredient from such starting substances as CuCO.sub.3, CuC.sub.2 O.sub.4, CuCN, Cu.sub.2 S, Cr.sub.2 (CH.sub.3 COO).sub.3, Cr.sub.2 (SO.sub.3).sub.3 , V.sub.2 S.sub.3, Mo(OH).sub.3, Mo(OH).sub.5, MnCO.sub.3, and MnC.sub.2 O.sub.4.
The invention also dictates the use, in combination with the first, second and third ingredients, of at least one additional metal oxide selected from the group of GeO.sub.2, ZnO, B.sub.2 O.sub.3, and PbO. The metal oxide chosen as the fourth ingredient is also required to exist as such in the completed ceramics, so that it may be formed from such starting substances as Ge(OH).sub.2, ZnC.sub.2 O.sub.4, 5ZnO.sub.2 CO.sub.3 4H.sub.2 O, PbC.sub.2 O.sub.4, and (PbCO.sub.3).sub.2 Pb(OH).sub.2.
The following EXAMPLES will provide further details of the compositions and manufacturing methods of the ceramic materials in accordance with the invention, as well as the characteristics of varistors incorporating the ceramic materials.
EXAMPLE 1
SrCO.sub.3 and TiO.sub.2, proportioned to combine into SrTiO.sub.3, were fired in a temperature range of 1050.degree.-1200.degree. C. for three hours. The fired substances were pulverized by means of a crusher, thus providing SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient of the desired ceramic materials. This first ingredient was combined with CeO.sub.2 as the second ingredient and V.sub.2 O.sub.5 as the third ingredient, in various proportions set forth in TABLE 1, wherein the Test Numbers refer to the combinations of the three ingredients in various proportions.
Each combination of the three ingredients, which were all in finely divided form, was then admixed with 5-10 wt.% polyvinyl alcohol, an organic binder. The admixtures were molded at pressures ranging from 500 to 2000 kg/cm.sup.2 into the form of discs each sized to have a diameter of 5 millimeters (mm) and a thickness of 0.8 mm on firing.
Then the moldings were fired for three hours at a temperature of 1390.degree. C., by being placed within a furnace for a total of 32 hours, in a reductive atmosphere of 95 vol. % N.sub.2 and five vol. % H.sub.2. The firing temperature could be anywhere between about 1300.degree. and about 1500.degree. C., and the firing time could be from one to six hours depending upon the firing temperature selected. Then, in order to control the varistor voltage (rising voltage of the voltage-current curve) of the end products, the fired moldings were treated at a temperature of 900.degree. C. for two hours in an oxidative atmosphere of air, by being placed within a furnace for a total of six hours. This oxidizing heat treatment could be effected in a temperature range of about 800-1300.degree. C., for a length of time ranging from about 0.5 to 6.0 hours depending upon the temperature.
Then, as illustrated in FIG. 1, each disc-like ceramic body 1 composed and fabricated in accordance with the invention has its opposite faces coated with silver paint to be processed into a varistor. The silver coatings were baked in a temperature range of 400-1000.degree. C. into a pair of electrodes 2 and 3, thus completing the desired varistor. The varistor according to this invention derives its intended functions from the interior of the sintered body itself, so that the electrodes 2 and 3 could be made from other materials such as indium-gallium alloy, and by other methods such as evaporation or plating.
The ceramic body 1 of the varistor prepared as above comprises fine, conductive crystal grains 4 dispersed in a resistive oxide region 5, just like the ZnO varistor ceramic. The nonlinearity of its volt-ampere characteristic results as the first ingredient, SrTiO.sub.3, is acted upon by the second, CeO.sub.2, and third, V.sub.2 O.sub.5, ingredients. Although the exact reason for this is not necessarily clear, a fairly reasonable theory would be that the second ingredient acts on the minute crystal particles 4 of the first ingredient to provide N-type semiconductors, whereas the oxide region 5, composed principally of the third ingredient, provides a P-type semiconductor.
Polyvinyl alcohol was used to bind the three pulverized ingredients in molding them into disc-like shape. This organic binder evaporates or is burnt out by the subsequent heat treatments of the moldings. Consequently the composition of the completed ceramic body 1 essentially corresponds to the starting substances only.
The characteristics of the varistors of this class might be evaluated from 60 and K in the volt-ampere characteristic formula of varistors in general, I=(V/K).alpha., where I is the varistor current, V the applied voltage, K a constant, and .alpha. a coefficient indicative of the voltage-current nonlinearity. Exact measurement of K is difficult, however, so that the characteristics of the above prepared varistors were ascertained from the varistor voltage E.sub.10 when a current of 10 mA was flowing, and from .alpha.=1/log (E.sub.10 /E.sub.1), where E.sub.1 is the varistor voltage corresponding to a current of 1 mA. The following TABLE 1 represents the various sets of proportions of the three noted ingredients used to produce the varistors in this EXAMPLE 1, together with their varistor voltage E.sub.10, nonlinearity coefficient .alpha., and electrostatic capacity C. The electrostatic capacities of the varistors were measured at a frequency of 1 kHz.
TABLE 1______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 CeO.sub.2 V.sub.2 O.sub.5 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.98 0.01 0.01 13 6 492 99.94 0.05 0.01 5 5 513 99.89 0.10 0.01 4 4 634 98.99 1.00 0.01 7 5 575 94.99 5.00 0.01 12 6 506 99.94 0.01 0.05 20 7 527 99.90 0.05 0.05 7 6 668 99.85 0.10 0.05 6 5 769 98.95 1.00 0.05 11 6 6210 94.95 5.00 0.05 18 7 5311 99.89 0.01 0.10 32 11 4612 99.85 0.05 0.10 12 6 5713 99.80 0.10 0.10 10 6 6114 98.90 1.00 0.10 17 7 5615 94.90 5.00 0.10 29 9 4716 99.49 0.01 0.50 64 20 3717 99.45 0.05 0.50 25 8 5018 99.40 0.10 0.50 20 7 5119 98.50 1.00 0.50 36 11 4620 94.50 5.00 0.50 61 20 3321 98.99 0.01 1.00 106 35 2622 98.95 0.05 1.00 45 13 4123 98.90 0.10 1.00 36 12 3924 98.00 1.00 1.00 63 21 3125 94.00 5.00 1.00 101 34 21______________________________________
FIG. 2 graphically represents by way of example the volt-ampere characteristic of the varistor of Test No. 13 given in TABLE 1.
The varistor of Test No. 13 was also evaluated as to the attenuation of various megahertz frequencies, by connecting the varistor in parallel with a signal generator and with a spectrum analyzer. The curve A in the graph of FIG. 3 represents the results. The curve B in the same graph indicates, by way of comparison, the damping characteristic (measured by the smae method as above) of a varistor having its ceramic body composed principally of ZnO. A comparison of the curves A and B will reveal that the varistor according to this invention has a higher damping ability over a wide frequency range, thus exhibiting a capacitor-like property. The inventive material is therefore capable of absorbing voltage surges, noise, etc., by acting as both varistor and capacitor.
Although only the varistor of Test No. 13 was experimented as to its capacitor-like property, it is obvious that all the other varistors fabricated in this EXAMPLE 1 have a similar property, for their varistor voltages E.sub.10 all fall between four and 106 V, their voltage-current nonlinearity coefficients .alpha. between four and 35, and their electrostatic capacities C between 21 and 76 nF.
In thus producing the SrTiO.sub.3 -CeO.sub.2 -V.sub.2 O.sub.5 varistors proportioned as in TABLE 1, it has proved that if the proportion of the third ingredient, V.sub.2 O.sub.5, is less than about 0.01%, the material introduces considerable fluctuations in the varistor voltage E.sub.10 and nonlinearity coefficient .alpha. of the resulting products, making it difficult to provide varistors of desired properties. If the proportion of V.sub.2 O.sub.5 exceeds about 1%, on the other hand, the resistive oxide region 5 of FIG. 5 has proved to occupy an unduly large space, with the V.sub.2 O.sub.5 present at the surfaces causing fusion of the adjacent ceramic bodies to each other.
EXAMPLE 2
Ceramic bodies were fabricated from a combination of SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient, WO.sub.3 as the second ingredient, and CrO.sub.3 as the third ingredient, and were processed into varistors, through exactly the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1. TABLE 2 indicates the various sets of proportions of the three ingredients used to produce the ceramic bodies, together with the varistor voltage E.sub.10, voltage-current non-linearity coefficient .alpha., and electrostatic capacity C of the corresponding varistors. These properties of the varistors were also measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1.
TABLE 2______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 WO.sub.3 CrO.sub.3 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.98 0.01 0.01 7 4 642 99.94 0.05 0.01 4 4 713 99.89 0.10 0.01 2 4 844 98.99 1.00 0.01 5 4 805 97.49 2.50 0.01 9 5 766 99.94 0.01 0.05 11 6 727 99.90 0.05 0.05 7 5 858 99.85 0.10 0.05 3 4 1019 98.95 1.00 0.05 9 5 9210 97.45 2.50 0.05 15 7 9011 99.89 0.01 0.10 17 7 6612 99.85 0.05 0.10 9 5 8013 99.80 0.10 0.10 5 4 10814 98.90 1.00 0.10 13 6 9915 97.40 2.50 0.10 22 8 8116 98.99 0.01 1.00 43 13 5317 98.95 0.05 1.00 25 8 6618 98.90 0.10 1.00 13 6 7319 98.00 1.00 1.00 33 10 6220 96.50 2.50 1.00 55 16 7021 97.99 0.01 2.00 55 15 4622 97.95 0.05 2.00 32 10 5923 97.90 0.10 2.00 15 7 6424 97.00 1.00 2.00 41 12 5925 95.50 2.50 2.00 74 22 57______________________________________
In the preparation of the ceramic bodies according to EXAMPLE 2 the oxidative heat treatment of the fired moldings converted the CrO.sub.3 into Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3. When the proportion of CrO.sub.3 was made less than about 0.01% the E.sub.10 and .alpha. of the resulting varistors fluctuated considerably. Also, when its proportion was made greater than about 2%, the relative space occupied by the resistive oxide region 5 became too large, and the Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 at the surfaces of the moldings caused their adhesion to each other.
EXAMPLE 3
SrTiO.sub.3 was employed as the first ingredient, Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 as the second ingredient, and CuO as the third ingredient. Combined in various sets of proportions listed in TABLE 3, these ingredients were treated into ceramic bodies, and further into varistors, through exactly the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1. TABLE 3 also shows the E.sub.10, , and C of the varistors, as ascertained by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1.
TABLE 3______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.98 0.01 0.01 10 5 802 99.94 0.05 0.01 5 5 813 99.89 0.10 0.01 3 4 964 98.99 1.00 0.01 6 5 625 97.49 2.50 0.01 13 6 766 99.94 0.01 0.05 11 6 997 99.90 0.05 0.05 6 5 1098 99.85 0.10 0.05 3 4 1169 98.95 1.00 0.05 7 5 10210 97.45 2.50 0.05 14 6 8911 99.89 0.01 0.10 12 6 7912 99.85 0.05 0.10 6 5 9313 99.80 0.10 0.10 4 4 10714 98.90 1.00 0.10 8 5 9315 97.40 2.50 0.10 16 7 8016 98.99 0.01 1.00 36 18 6617 98.95 0.05 1.00 18 8 7218 98.90 0.10 1.00 11 6 9019 98.00 1.00 1.00 22 9 8120 96.50 2.50 1.00 47 21 7721 94.99 0.01 5.00 73 30 5222 94.95 0.05 5.00 36 17 6123 94.90 0.10 5.00 23 9 7324 94.00 1.00 5.00 45 20 6225 92.50 2.50 5.00 95 37 61______________________________________
An inspection of TABLE 3 will show that the percentage of Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 is fixed at 0.1 in some tests, while in others the percentage of CuO is fixed at 0.01. FIG. 4 graphically represents the curve of the E.sub.10 of those varistors whose Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 content is fixed at 0.1%, plotted against the varying percentages of their CuO content. FIG. 5, on the other hand, plots the curve of the E.sub.10 of those varistors whose CuO content is fixed at 0.01%, against the varying percentages of their Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 content.
A decrease of the CuO content to less than about 0.01% caused substantial fluctuations in the E.sub.10 and .alpha. of the resulting varistors. The CuO content of over 5%, on the other hand, made too large the relative space occupied by the resistive oxide region 5 of each varistor, and caused mutual adhesion of the adjacent ceramic moldings through the CuO lying at their surfaces.
EXAMPLE 4
Disc-like ceramic bodies were fabricated from SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient, Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 as the second ingredient, and Cu.sub.2 O as the third ingredient, in various sets of proportions, and were processed into varistors, through exactly the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1. TABLE 4 represents the proportions of the three ingredients, as well as the E.sub.10, .alpha., and C of the resulting varistors, as measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1.
TABLE 4______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 Cu.sub.2 O E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.98 0.01 0.01 7 4 572 99.94 0.05 0.01 4 4 633 99.89 0.10 0.01 2 4 734 98.99 1.00 0.01 5 4 705 97.49 2.50 0.01 9 5 516 99.94 0.01 0.05 11 6 687 99.90 0.05 0.05 7 5 748 99.85 0.10 0.05 3 4 899 98.95 1.00 0.05 9 5 6910 97.45 2.50 0.05 15 7 5811 99.89 0.01 0.10 17 7 5112 99.85 0.05 0.10 9 5 6713 99.80 0.10 0.10 5 4 7114 98.90 1.00 0.10 13 6 6315 97.40 2.50 0.10 22 8 5316 98.99 0.01 1.00 43 13 4717 98.95 0.05 1.00 25 8 5918 98.90 0.10 1.00 13 6 6319 98.00 1.00 1.00 33 10 5420 96.50 2.50 1.00 55 16 4721 97.99 0.01 2.00 55 15 3622 97.95 0.05 2.00 32 10 4823 97.90 0.10 2.00 15 7 5124 97.00 1.00 2.00 41 12 4225 95.50 2.50 2.00 73 22 30______________________________________
A decrease of the Cu.sub.2 O content to less than about 0.01% in the above combination caused substantial fluctuations in the E.sub.10 and .alpha. of the resulting varistors. When the Cu.sub.2 O content was made greater than about 2.5%, on the other hand, the resistive oxide region 5 occupied too large a space, causing the thermal fusion to each other of the adjacent ceramic moldings through the Cu.sub.2 O at their surfaces.
EXAMPLE 5
Ceramic discs were fabricated from SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient, La.sub.2 O.sub.3 as the second ingredient, and MoO.sub.3 as the third ingredient, in various sets of proportions, and were processed into varistors, through exactly the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1. TABLE 5 lists the proportions of the three ingredients, together with the E.sub.10, .alpha., and C of the varistors made therefrom, as measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1. Experiment has proved that the MoO.sub.3 content of the ceramic materials in the above combination should be from about 0.01 to about 5.00%, for, falling outside this range, MoO.sub.3 gave rise to the same difficulties as those pointed out in the foregoing EXAMPLES.
TABLE 5______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 MoO.sub.3 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.98 0.01 0.01 8 4 542 99.94 0.05 0.01 4 3 613 99.89 0.10 0.01 3 3 764 98.99 1.00 0.01 5 4 695 97.49 2.50 0.01 7 4 506 99.94 0.01 0.05 22 7 637 99.90 0.05 0.05 11 5 738 99.85 0.10 0.05 9 5 819 98.95 1.00 0.05 14 6 7010 97.45 2.50 0.05 20 7 5611 99.89 0.01 0.10 53 15 4912 99.85 0.05 0.10 28 9 6713 99.80 0.10 0.10 19 7 7014 98.90 1.00 0.10 36 11 5815 97.40 2.50 0.10 47 13 4816 98.99 0.01 1.00 53 15 4317 98.95 0.05 1.00 28 9 5118 98.90 0.10 1.00 19 7 6119 98.00 1.00 1.00 36 11 5420 96.50 2.50 1.00 47 13 4121 94.99 0.01 5.00 89 30 3022 94.95 0.05 5.00 46 13 4223 94.90 0.10 5.00 34 10 4824 94.00 1.00 5.00 57 17 4025 92.50 2.50 5.00 79 25 27______________________________________
EXAMPLE 6
Ceramic discs were fabricated from SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient, Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5 as the second ingredient, and MnO.sub.2 as the third ingredient, in various combinations of proportions, and were processed into varistors, through exactly the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1. TABLE 6 gives the proportions of the above three ingredients, together with the E.sub.10, , and C of the varistors made therefrom, as measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1. It has also been found that the MnO.sub.2 content of the ceramic discs in the above combination, if outside the range of about 0.01-2.50%, gives rise to the difficulties mentioned previously.
TABLE 6______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5 MnO.sub.2 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.985 0.005 0.01 9 5 632 99.94 0.05 0.01 4 4 713 99.49 0.50 0.01 2 3 814 98.99 1.00 0.01 5 4 735 97.49 2.50 0.01 8 5 616 99.945 0.005 0.05 16 7 687 99.90 0.05 0.05 7 5 798 99.45 0.50 0.05 4 4 969 98.95 1.00 0.05 9 5 8210 97.45 2.50 0.05 14 6 7711 99.895 0.005 0.10 23 8 7012 99.85 0.05 0.10 11 5 8613 99.40 0.50 0.10 7 5 10114 98.90 1.00 0.10 14 6 6015 97.40 2.50 0.10 21 7 5816 98.995 0.005 1.00 59 17 5417 98.95 0.05 1.00 27 10 7618 98.50 0.50 1.00 13 6 9019 98.00 1.00 1.00 34 10 6120 96.50 2.50 1.00 51 15 4921 97.495 0.005 2.50 91 32 4922 97.45 0.05 2.50 42 13 6123 97.00 0.50 2.50 21 8 7324 96.50 1.00 2.50 53 16 5425 95.00 2.50 2.50 83 27 44______________________________________
EXAMPLE 7
Ceramic discs were fabricated from SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient, Sm.sub.2 O.sub.3 as the second ingredient, and CuO as the third ingredient, in various combinations of proportions, and were processed into varistors, through exactly the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1. TABLE 7 lists the proportions of the above three ingredients, together with the E.sub.10, .alpha., and C of the varistors made therefrom, as measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1.
TABLE 7______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Sm.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.98 0.01 0.01 8 5 542 99.94 0.05 0.01 4 4 633 99.89 0.10 0.01 3 4 724 98.99 1.00 0.01 6 4 695 96.99 3.00 0.01 10 5 606 99.94 0.01 0.05 12 6 467 99.90 0.05 0.05 6 5 728 99.85 0.10 0.05 4 4 819 98.95 1.00 0.05 9 5 8610 96.95 3.00 0.05 14 6 6311 99.89 0.01 0.10 18 7 4112 99.85 0.05 0.10 9 5 6513 99.80 0.10 0.10 7 5 7314 98.90 1.00 0.10 13 6 7015 96.90 3.00 0.10 22 8 5916 98.99 0.01 1.00 43 12 3717 98.95 0.05 1.00 19 7 5318 98.90 0.10 1.00 16 7 6119 98.00 1.00 1.00 29 8 7220 96.00 3.00 1.00 48 13 4221 94.99 0.01 5.00 71 23 4022 94.95 0.05 5.00 35 11 4923 94.90 0.10 5.00 28 9 6024 94.00 1.00 5.00 51 15 5425 92.00 3.00 5.00 93 31 39______________________________________
EXAMPLE 8
Ceramic discs were fabricated from SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient, Pr.sub.6 O.sub.11 as the second ingredient, and MnO.sub.2 as the third ingredient, in various combinations of proportions, and were processed into varistors, through exactly the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1. TABLE 8 lists the proportions of the above three ingredients, together with the E.sub.10, .alpha., and C of the varistors made therefrom, as measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1.
TABLE 8______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Pr.sub.6 O.sub.11 MnO.sub.2 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.989 0.001 0.01 10 5 682 99.98 0.01 0.01 5 4 713 99.89 0.10 0.01 2 4 844 98.99 1.00 0.01 6 5 765 97.49 2.50 0.01 11 6 706 99.949 0.001 0.05 15 6 747 99.94 0.01 0.05 7 5 778 99.85 0.10 0.05 3 4 919 98.95 1.00 0.05 9 5 8310 97.45 2.50 0.05 17 7 7711 99.899 0.001 0.10 22 8 6012 99.89 0.01 0.10 11 6 6813 99.80 0.10 0.10 5 5 8214 98.90 1.00 0.10 13 6 7115 97.40 2.50 0.10 24 8 6916 98.999 0.001 1.00 48 12 5117 98.99 0.01 1.00 24 8 5318 98.90 0.10 1.00 9 5 7619 98.00 1.00 1.00 29 9 6320 96.50 2.50 1.00 52 15 6121 97.499 0.001 2.50 88 24 2922 97.49 0.01 2.50 43 11 4423 97.40 0.10 2.50 17 7 5424 96.50 1.00 2.50 43 13 5025 95.00 2.50 2.50 97 31 42______________________________________
EXAMPLE 9
Ceramic discs were fabricated from SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient, Nd.sub.2 O.sub.3 as the second ingredient, and CrO.sub.3 as the third ingredient, in various combinations of proportions, and were processed into varistors, through exactly the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1. TABLE 9 lists the proportions of the above three ingredients, together with the E.sub.10, .alpha., and C of the varistors made therefrom, as measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1. In the preparation of of the ceramic discs according to this EXAMPLE 9 the oxidative heat treatment of the fired moldings converted the CrO.sub.3 into Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3.
TABLE 9______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nd.sub.2 O.sub.3 CrO.sub.3 E.sub.10,V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.98 0.01 0.01 7 5 662 99.94 0.05 0.01 3 4 693 99.89 0.10 0.01 2 4 774 98.99 1.00 0.01 5 5 715 95.99 4.00 0.01 11 6 636 99.94 0.01 0.05 10 6 697 99.90 0.05 0.05 4 4 788 99.85 0.10 0.05 4 4 889 98.95 1.00 0.05 7 5 7610 95.95 4.00 0.05 17 7 6911 99.89 0.01 0.10 15 7 6512 99.85 0.05 0.10 7 5 7113 99.80 0.10 0.10 5 4 7614 98.90 1.00 0.10 12 6 7015 95.90 4.00 0.10 23 8 6116 98.99 0.01 1.00 34 10 6017 98.95 0.05 1.00 15 6 6218 98.90 0.10 1.00 10 5 6119 98.00 1.00 1.00 25 8 6020 95.00 4.00 1.00 54 15 5921 97.99 0.01 2.00 60 18 5122 97.95 0.05 2.00 25 8 5123 97.90 0.10 2.00 17 7 5224 97.00 1.00 2.00 43 12 5125 94.00 4.00 2.00 94 30 50______________________________________
EXAMPLE 10
Ceramic discs were fabricated from SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient, Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 as the second ingredient, and MoO.sub.3 as the third ingredient, in various combinations of proportions, and were processed into varistors, through exactly the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1. TABLE 10 lists the proportions of the above three ingredients, together with the E.sub.10, .alpha., and C of the varistors made therefrom, as measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1.
TABLE 10______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 MoO.sub.3 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.98 0.01 0.01 8 5 422 99.94 0.05 0.01 3 4 503 99.89 0.10 0.01 2 4 614 98.99 1.00 0.01 5 4 525 95.99 4.00 0.01 12 6 466 99.94 0.01 0.05 12 6 467 99.90 0.05 0.05 4 4 638 99.85 0.10 0.05 3 4 749 98.95 1.00 0.05 7 5 6610 95.95 4.00 0.05 18 7 5211 99.89 0.01 0.10 18 7 4112 99.85 0.05 0.10 7 5 5113 99.80 0.10 0.10 5 4 6314 98.90 1.00 0.10 11 6 5715 95.90 4.00 0.10 25 8 4116 98.99 0.01 1.00 38 11 3317 98.95 0.05 1.00 15 7 4918 98.90 0.10 1.00 9 6 6119 98.00 1.00 1.00 24 8 4120 95.00 4.00 1.00 57 16 3621 94.99 0.01 5.00 70 21 1922 94.95 0.05 5.00 27 8 3223 94.90 0.10 5.00 17 7 4324 94.00 1.00 5.00 43 13 3325 91.00 4.00 5.00 99 29 21______________________________________
EXAMPLE 11
This EXAMPLE is intended for the confirmation of the fact that the use of two different metal oxides as the second set of ingredients, in combination with the first and third ingredients chosen in accordance with the invention, makes the resulting ceramic materials as suitable for varistors as those containing but one second ingredient. The following combinations of two different metal oxides were tested as the second sets of ingredients, together with SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient and CuO as the third ingredient: Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 and Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5, Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 and WO.sub.3, Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 and La.sub.2 O.sub.3, Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 and CeO.sub.2, Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 and Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3, La.sub.2 O.sub.5 and Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5, La.sub.2 O.sub.3 and WO.sub.3, La.sub.2 O.sub.3 and CeO.sub.2, La.sub.2 O.sub.3 and Nd.sub.2 O.sub.3, and La.sub.2 O.sub.3 and Sm.sub.2 O.sub.3.
Ceramic discs were fabricated from the combinations of the above enumerated components, in various sets of proportions, and were processed into varistors, through exactly the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1. TABLES 11A through 11J represent the proportions of the respective combinations of components, as well as the E.sub.10, .alpha., and C of the varistors prepared therefrom, as measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1. It will be noted from these tables that the ceramic compositions of this EXAMPLE 11 are as suitable for varistors as those of EXAMPLES 1 through 10.
TABLE 11A______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.4 0.02 0.08 0.5 12 5 712 99.4 0.05 0.05 0.5 13 6 683 99.4 0.08 0.02 0.5 13 6 67______________________________________
TABLE 11B______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 WO.sub.3 CuO E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________4 99.4 0.02 0.08 0.5 14 6 665 99.4 0.05 0.05 0.5 13 6 656 99.4 0.08 0.02 0.5 14 6 67______________________________________
TABLE 11C______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________7 99.4 0.02 0.08 0.5 9 5 798 99.4 0.05 0.05 0.5 8 5 839 99.4 0.08 0.02 0.5 8 5 86______________________________________
TABLE 11D______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CeO.sub.2 CuO E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________10 99.4 0.02 0.08 0.5 7 5 8911 99.4 0.05 0.05 0.5 8 5 9112 99.4 0.08 0.02 0.5 7 5 90______________________________________
TABLE 11E______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________13 99.4 0.02 0.08 0.5 7 5 8714 99.4 0.05 0.05 0.5 7 5 8915 99.4 0.08 0.02 0.5 6 4 93______________________________________
TABLE 11F______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________16 99.4 0.02 0.08 0.5 10 5 7617 99.4 0.05 0.05 0.5 11 5 7318 99.4 0.08 0.02 0.5 10 5 77______________________________________
TABLE 11G______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 WO.sub.3 CuO E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________19 99.4 0.02 0.08 0.5 11 5 7020 99.4 0.05 0.05 0.5 12 5 6521 99.4 0.08 0.02 0.5 10 5 74______________________________________
TABLE 11H______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 CeO.sub.2 CuO E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________22 99.4 0.02 0.08 0.5 7 4 8423 99.4 0.05 0.05 0.5 7 5 8324 99.4 0.08 0.02 0.5 8 5 79______________________________________
TABLE 11I______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 Nd.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________25 99.4 0.02 0.08 0.5 6 4 9226 99.4 0.05 0.05 0.5 7 4 8627 99.4 0.08 0.02 0.5 7 4 83______________________________________
TABLE 11J______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 Sm.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________28 99.4 0.02 0.08 0.5 8 5 8329 99.4 0.05 0.05 0.5 7 4 9030 99.4 0.08 0.02 0.5 7 5 87______________________________________
EXAMPLE 12
This EXAMPLE is intended to prove that ceramic materials suitable for varistors can be fabricated with the use of two different metal oxides as the third set of ingredients, in combination with the first and second ingredients chosen in accordance with the invention. The following combinations of two different metal oxides were tested as the second sets of ingredients, together with SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient and Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5, WO.sub.3 or La.sub.2 O.sub.3 as the second ingredient: CuO and Cu.sub.2 O, CuO and MoO.sub.3, MoO.sub.3 and V.sub.2 O.sub.5, V.sub.2 O.sub.5 and CrO.sub.3, and CrO.sub.3 and Cu.sub.2 O.
Ceramic bodies were fabricated from the various combinations of four of the listed ingredients, in various sets of proportions, and were processed into varistors, through exactly the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1. TABLES 12A through 12-O represent the proportions of such combinations of ingredients, as well as the E.sub.10, .alpha., and C of the varistors prepared therefrom, as measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1. The tabulated results indicate that the ceramic compositions of this EXAMPLE 12 are as suitable for varistors as those of EXAMPLES 1 through 10.
TABLE 12A______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO Cu.sub.2 O E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 11 5 692 99.4 0.1 0.25 0.25 10 5 723 99.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 11 5 68______________________________________
TABLE 12B______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO MoO.sub.3 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________4 99.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 12 5 685 99.4 0.1 0.25 0.25 11 5 706 99.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 10 5 73______________________________________
TABLE 12C______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 MoO.sub.3 V.sub.2 O.sub.5 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________7 99.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 13 5 628 99.4 0.1 0.25 0.25 15 6 599 99.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 15 6 59______________________________________
TABLE 12D______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 V.sub.2 O.sub.5 CrO.sub.3 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________10 99.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 15 6 6011 99.4 0.1 0.25 0.25 14 5 6212 99.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 13 5 67______________________________________
TABLE 12E______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CrO.sub.3 Cu.sub.2 O E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________13 99.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 10 5 7214 99.4 0.1 0.25 0.25 9 5 7615 99.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 12 5 67______________________________________
TABLE 12F______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 WO.sub.3 CuO Cu.sub.2 O E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________16 99.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 12 5 6517 99.4 0.1 0.25 0.25 13 6 6218 99.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 13 5 63______________________________________
TABLE 12G______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 WO.sub.3 CuO MoO.sub.3 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________19 99.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 13 5 6220 99.4 0.1 0.25 0.25 15 5 5921 99.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 15 6 57______________________________________
TABLE 12H______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 WO.sub.3 MoO.sub.3 V.sub.2 O.sub.5 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________22 99.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 14 5 6023 99.4 0.1 0.25 0.25 16 6 5524 99.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 15 6 59______________________________________
TABLE 12I______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 WO.sub.3 V.sub.2 O.sub.5 CrO.sub.3 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________25 99.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 16 6 5526 99.4 0.1 0.25 0.25 16 6 5427 99.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 13 5 62______________________________________
TABLE 12J______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 WO.sub.3 CrO.sub.3 Cu.sub.2 O E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________28 99.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 10 5 7129 99.4 0.1 0.25 0.25 12 5 6630 99.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 12 5 65______________________________________
TABLE 12K______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO Cu.sub.2 O E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________31 99.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 8 5 7732 99.4 0.1 0.25 0.25 7 5 8133 99.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 7 5 82______________________________________
TABLE 12L______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO MoO.sub.3 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________34 99.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 7 5 8235 99.4 0.1 0.25 0.25 7 5 8336 99.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 8 5 80______________________________________
TABLE 12M______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 MoO.sub.3 V.sub.2 O.sub.5 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________37 99.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 9 5 7638 99.4 0.1 0.25 0.25 9 5 7239 99.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 10 5 69______________________________________
TABLE 12N______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 V.sub.2 O.sub.5 CrO.sub.3 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________40 99.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 10 5 6841 99.4 0.1 0.25 0.25 9 5 7242 99.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 8 5 81______________________________________
TABLE 12-O______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 CrO.sub.3 Cu.sub.2 O E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________43 99.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 7 4 8244 99.4 0.1 0.25 0.25 6 4 8545 99.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 7 5 83______________________________________
EXAMPLE 13
In order to ascertain the relationship between the temperatures of the oxidative heat treatment during the fabrication of ceramic materials and the properties of the varistors made therefrom, the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment was set in this EXAMPLE at various values from 700.degree. to 1170.degree. C. Ceramic bodies were fabricated from the combinations of SrTiO.sub.3, Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 and CuO, of SrTiO.sub.3, Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 and Cu.sub.2 O, of SrTiO.sub.3, CeO.sub.2 and V.sub.2 O.sub.5, of SrTiO.sub.3, WO.sub.3 and CrO.sub.3, of SrTiO.sub.3, Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 and MoO.sub.3, and of SrTiO.sub.3, Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5 and MnO.sub.2, in various sets of proportions, and were processed into varistors in a manner identical in other respects with that of EXAMPLE 1. TABLES 13A through 13F give the proportions of such combinations of ingredients, as well as the temperatures of the oxidative heat treatment, the resistivities of the ceramic bodies, and of the varistors made therefrom. The resistivity was measured by the four-probe method at a temperature of 25.degree. C.
TABLE 13A______________________________________ Temperature of PropertiesTest Composition in percent oxidative heat Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO treatment, .degree.C. ohm-cm .alpha.______________________________________1 99.0 0.5 0.5 700 .sup. 5 .times. 10.sup.-1 12 99.0 0.5 0.5 800 3 .times. 10.sup. 23 99.0 0.5 0.5 900 1 .times. 10.sup.3 44 99.0 0.5 0.5 1000 5 .times. 10.sup.3 135 99.0 0.5 0.5 1100 8 .times. 10.sup.3 266 99.0 0.5 0.5 1170 2 .times. 10.sup.4 61______________________________________
TABLE 13B______________________________________ Temperature of PropertiesTest Composition in percent oxidative heat Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 Cu.sub.2 O treatment, .degree.C. ohm-cm .alpha.______________________________________ 7 99.0 0.5 0.5 700 .sup. 6 .times. 10.sup.-1 1 8 99.0 0.5 0.5 800 4 .times. 10.sup. 2 9 99.0 0.5 0.5 900 1 .times. 10.sup.3 410 99.0 0.5 0.5 1000 5 .times. 10.sup.3 1211 99.0 0.5 0.5 1100 9 .times. 10.sup.3 2912 99.0 0.5 0.5 1170 3 .times. 10.sup.4 69______________________________________
TABLE 13C______________________________________ Temperature of PropertiesTest Composition in percent oxidative heat Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 CeO.sub.2 V.sub.2 O.sub.5 treatment, .degree.C. ohm-cm .alpha.______________________________________13 99.0 0.5 0.5 700 .sup. 8 .times. 10.sup.-1 114 99.0 0.5 0.5 800 6 .times. 10.sup. 215 99.0 0.5 0.5 900 2 .times. 10.sup.3 416 99.0 0.5 0.5 1000 7 .times. 10.sup.3 1517 99.0 0.5 0.5 1100 10 .times. 10.sup.3 3118 99.0 0.5 0.5 1170 5 .times. 10.sup.4 84______________________________________
TABLE 13D______________________________________ Temperature of PropertiesTest Composition in percent oxidative heat Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 WO.sub.3 CrO.sub.3 treatment, .degree.C. ohm-cm .alpha.______________________________________19 99.0 0.5 0.5 700 .sup. 6 .times. 10.sup.-1 120 99.0 0.5 0.5 800 6 .times. 10.sup. 221 99.0 0.5 0.5 900 1 .times. 10.sup.3 422 99.0 0.5 0.5 1000 6 .times. 10.sup.3 1323 99.0 0.5 0.5 1100 8 .times. 10.sup.3 3024 99.0 0.5 0.5 1170 3 .times. 10.sup.4 70______________________________________
TABLE 13E______________________________________ Temperature of PropertiesTest Composition in percent oxidative heat Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 MoO.sub.3 treatment, .degree.C. ohm-cm .alpha.______________________________________25 99.0 0.5 0.5 700 .sup. 7 .times. 10.sup.-1 126 99.0 0.5 0.5 800 7 .times. 10.sup. 227 99.0 0.5 0.5 900 2 .times. 10.sup.3 428 99.0 0.5 0.5 1000 7 .times. 10.sup.3 1629 99.0 0.5 0.5 1100 11 .times. 10.sup.3 3330 99.0 0.5 0.5 1170 5 .times. 10.sup.4 86______________________________________
TABLE 13F______________________________________ Temperature of PropertiesTest Composition in percent oxidative heat Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5 MnO.sub.2 treatment, .degree.C. ohm-cm .alpha.______________________________________31 99.0 0.5 0.5 700 .sup. 6 .times. 10.sup.-1 132 99.0 0.5 0.5 800 4 .times. 10.sup. 233 99.0 0.5 0.5 900 1 .times. 10.sup.3 434 99.0 0.5 0.5 1000 6 .times. 10.sup.3 1235 99.0 0.5 0.5 1100 9 .times. 10.sup.3 3136 99.0 0.5 0.5 1170 3 .times. 10.sup.4 63______________________________________
On the basis of the data given in TABLE 13A, FIG. 6 plots the curve of the .alpha. of the SrTiO.sub.3 -Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 -CuO varistors against the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment. This graph makes clear that the .alpha. of the varistors can be controlled by the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment during the fabrication of the ceramic bodies. It will also be seen from TABLES 13A through 13F that the resistivity of the ceramic bodies varies with the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment. For the provision of varistors of the desired characteristics, therefore, the oxidative heat treatment should be conducted in a temperature range of about 800.degree.-1170.degree. C. Should the temperature be less than about 800.degree. C., the .alpha. of the ceramic bodies would become too small for varistors. If the temperature were made higher than about 1300.degree. C., on the other hand, then the resistivity of the ceramic bodies would become too high for varistors.
EXAMPLE 14
Ceramic discs were fabricated from various combinations of three possible ingredients set forth in TABLE 14, in like proportions, and were processed into varistors, through a procedure similar to that of EXAMPLE 1. In order to evaluate the pulse-withstanding abilities of these varistors, 10 voltage pulses of 100 V were successively applied to each varistor, and a rate of change in E.sub.10 before and after the pulse application was calculated. TABLE 14 summarizes the results.
TABLE 14______________________________________Composition Second Rate ofTest First ingredient ingredient Third ingredient change inNo. 99.4% 0.1% 0.5% E.sub.10, %______________________________________1 SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO 0.032 SrTiO.sub.3 WO.sub.3 CrO.sub.3 0.023 SrTiO.sub.3 Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5 MnO.sub.2 0.034 SrTiO.sub.3 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 MoO.sub.3 0.065 SrTiO.sub.3 Sm.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO 0.046 SrTiO.sub.3 CeO.sub.2 V.sub.2 O.sub.5 0.047 SrTiO.sub.3 Pr.sub.6 O.sub.11 MnO.sub.2 0.068 SrTiO.sub.3 Nd.sub.2 O.sub.3 CrO.sub.3 0.059 SrTiO.sub.3 Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 Cu.sub.2 O 0.0510 SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 MoO.sub.3 0.06______________________________________
It will be observed from TABLE 14 that the E.sub.10 of the various varistors in accordance with the invention varies only from 0.02 to 0.06% before and after the application of ten 100-volt pulses in succession. The rate of change in E.sub.10 of the conventional ZnO varistors, measured by a like method by way of comparison, was in the range of 15-20%. The little change in E.sub.10 of the varistors in accordance with the invention evidences that they hardly suffer from voltage surges in use.
The above presented EXAMPLES 1 through 14 prove that the second ingredient should be used in a proportion of about 0.001-5.000% in any combination with first and second ingredients in the manufacture of ceramic materials in accordance with the invention. Intended as an additive for making the materials semiconductive, the second ingredient when used in that range makes the size of the crystal grains from about 20 to 40 micrometers in diameter and does not make the E.sub.10 too high. Should the content of the second ingredient fall outside the specified range, the grain size would become too large, and the E.sub.10 too high, to provide favorable semiconductor materials and favorable varistors. The proportion of the second ingredient should be in a range of 0.05-1.00% to obtain appropriate values of E.sub.10.
Intended as an additive for improving the nonlinear volt-ampere characteristic of the ceramic materials, the third ingredient should be used in an amount ranging from about 0.01 to about 5.00%. If the content of the third ingredient were less than about 0.01%, the E.sub.10, .alpha., etc., of ceramic bodies would fluctuate considerably, making it difficult to provide varistors of desired performance characteristics. If it were greater than about 5.00%, on the other hand, then the resistive oxide region 5, FIG. 1, of each ceramic body would occupy too large a space in relation to the crystal grains 4, and the third ingredient at the surfaces of the ceramic bodies would cause their mutual adhesion during firing or would flow over the surfaces. Too great a proportion of the third ingredient would also result in an unduly high value of E.sub.10. A preferred range of the proportion of the third ingredient is from about 0.05 to about 1.00%.
EXAMPLE 15
While all the foregoing EXAMPLES dealt with the ceramic compositions of the first, second and third ingredients, the present EXAMPLE introduces a fourth ingredient with a view to the higher coherency of the ceramic bodies. The particular fourth ingredient herein employed was GeO.sub.2, in combination with SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient, Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 as the second ingredient, and CuO as the third ingredient, and in various sets of proportions presented in TABLE 15. These ingredients were processed into ceramic discs, and further into varistors, through the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1 except that GeO.sub.2 was used as the fourth ingredient and that the oxidative heat treatment of the fired bodies was performed at a temperature of 1000.degree. C. TABLE 15 also indicates the E.sub.10, .alpha., and C of the varistors manufactured as above.
As is apparent from the tabulated results, the varistors containing the fourth ingredient have properties similar to those of the varistors having no fourth ingredient. The addition of GeO.sub.2 as the fourth ingredient, however, made more uniform the size of the ceramic particles, which ranged from 20 to 40 micrometers, thereby serving to reduce fluctuations in the E.sub.10 and .alpha. of the varistors.
TABLE 15______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO GeO.sub.2 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.48 0.01 0.01 0.5 8 5 1012 99.44 0.05 0.01 0.5 3 4 1073 99.39 0.10 0.01 0.5 2 4 1204 98.49 1.00 0.01 0.5 6 5 1015 96.99 2.50 0.01 0.5 11 5 966 99.44 0.01 0.05 0.5 9 5 977 99.40 0.05 0.05 0.5 3 4 1018 99.35 0.10 0.05 0.5 2 4 1169 98.45 1.00 0.05 0.5 7 5 9910 96.95 2.50 0.05 0.5 12 5 9511 99.39 0.01 0.10 0.5 10 6 8912 99.35 0.05 0.10 0.5 4 4 10013 99.30 0.10 0.10 0.5 3 4 11714 98.40 1.00 0.10 0.5 8 6 9215 96.90 2.50 0.10 0.5 14 7 8616 98.49 0.01 1.00 0.5 18 8 8217 98.45 0.05 1.00 0.5 10 6 9218 98.40 0.10 1.00 0.5 7 6 10519 97.50 1.00 1.00 0.5 14 8 8520 96.00 2.50 1.00 0.5 33 11 6121 94.49 0.01 5.00 0.5 35 12 6622 94.45 0.05 5.00 0.5 24 9 7923 94.40 0.10 5.00 0.5 16 8 9124 93.50 1.00 5.00 0.5 26 10 7625 92.00 2.50 5.00 0.5 89 32 33______________________________________
EXAMPLE 16
SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient was combined with Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 as the second ingredient, Cu.sub.2 O as the third ingredient, and GeO.sub.2 as the fourth ingredient. In various sets of proportions these ingredients were processed into ceramic discs, and further into varistors, through the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1 except that the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment was 1000.degree. C. TABLE 16 lists the proportions of the above four ingredients, together with the E.sub.10, .alpha., and C of the varistors made therefrom, as measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1.
TABLE 16______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 Cu.sub.2 O GeO.sub.2 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.48 0.01 0.01 0.5 9 4 762 99.44 0.05 0.01 0.5 4 4 873 99.39 0.10 0.01 0.5 2 4 984 98.49 1.00 0.01 0.5 5 4 865 96.99 2.50 0.01 0.5 14 6 716 99.44 0.01 0.05 0.5 10 5 757 99.40 0.05 0.05 0.5 4 4 838 99.35 0.10 0.05 0.5 2 4 1009 98.45 1.00 0.05 0.5 6 4 8110 96.95 2.50 0.05 0.5 16 7 7311 99.39 0.01 0.10 0.5 12 6 7212 99.35 0.05 0.10 0.5 5 5 8113 99.30 0.10 0.10 0.5 3 4 9214 98.40 1.00 0.10 0.5 6 4 8215 96.90 2.50 0.10 0.5 17 8 6216 98.49 0.01 1.00 0.5 33 11 6117 98.45 0.05 1.00 0.5 14 7 7418 98.40 0.10 1.00 0.5 7 5 8219 97.50 1.00 1.00 0.5 18 8 6320 96.00 2.50 1.00 0.5 49 15 4321 96.99 0.01 2.50 0.5 65 21 3622 96.95 0.05 2.50 0.5 29 10 5123 96.90 0.10 2.50 0.5 15 7 7724 96.00 1.00 2.50 0.5 36 10 5125 94.50 2.50 2.50 0.5 95 34 29______________________________________
EXAMPLE 17
SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient was combined with Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 as the second ingredient, V.sub.2 O.sub.5 as the third ingredient, and GeO.sub.2 as the fourth ingredient. In various sets of of proportions these ingredients were processed into ceramic discs, and further into varistors, through the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1 except that the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment was 1000.degree. C. TABLE 17 lists the proportions of the above four ingredients, together with the E.sub.10, .alpha., and C of the varistors made therefrom, as measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1.
TABLE 17______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 V.sub.2 O.sub.5 GeO.sub.2 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.48 0.01 0.01 0.5 4 4 882 99.44 0.05 0.01 0.5 2 4 933 99.39 0.10 0.01 0.5 2 4 914 98.49 1.00 0.01 0.5 4 4 875 96.99 2.50 0.01 0.5 8 5 726 99.44 0.01 0.05 0.5 5 4 837 99.40 0.05 0.05 0.5 3 4 828 99.35 0.10 0.05 0.5 2 4 899 98.45 1.00 0.05 0.5 5 4 7910 96.95 2.50 0.05 0.5 10 5 6311 99.39 0.01 0.1 0.5 6 5 8112 99.35 0.05 0.1 0.5 3 4 8013 99.30 0.10 0.1 0.5 3 4 8114 98.40 1.00 0.1 0.5 7 4 6615 96.90 2.50 0.1 0.5 13 6 5116 98.99 0.01 0.50 0.5 12 6 7017 98.95 0.05 0.50 0.5 6 4 7618 98.90 0.10 0.50 0.5 5 4 8219 98.00 1.00 0.50 0.5 13 6 4920 96.50 2.50 0.50 0.5 25 8 4221 98.49 0.01 1.00 0.5 17 8 5022 98.45 0.05 1.00 0.5 9 5 7523 98.40 0.10 1.00 0.5 7 4 8024 97.50 1.00 1.00 0.5 19 8 4425 96.00 2.50 1.00 0.5 38 13 26______________________________________
EXAMPLE 18
SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient was combined with Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 as the second ingredient, CrO.sub.3 as the third ingredient, and GeO.sub.2 as the fourth ingredient. In various sets of proportions these ingredients were processed into ceramic discs, and further into varistors, through the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1 except that the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment was 1000.degree. C. TABLE 18 lists the proportions of the above four ingredients, together with the E.sub.10, .alpha., and C of the varistors made therefrom, as measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1.
TABLE 18______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CrO.sub.3 GeO.sub.2 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.48 0.01 0.01 0.5 8 5 612 99.44 0.05 0.01 0.5 3 4 773 99.39 0.10 0.01 0.5 2 4 764 98.49 1.00 0.01 0.5 7 5 605 96.99 2.50 0.01 0.5 14 6 526 99.44 0.01 0.05 0.5 9 5 607 99.40 0.05 0.05 0.5 3 4 768 99.35 0.10 0.05 0.5 2 4 719 98.45 1.00 0.05 0.5 8 5 6110 96.95 2.50 0.05 0.5 15 7 5011 99.39 0.01 0.10 0.5 10 6 6112 99.35 0.05 0.10 0.5 4 4 7213 99.30 0.10 0.10 0.5 3 4 7314 98.40 1.00 0.10 0.5 9 6 5215 96.90 2.50 0.10 0.5 18 7 4316 98.49 0.01 1.00 0.5 32 11 3517 98.45 0.05 1.00 0.5 12 5 6218 98.40 0.10 1.00 0.5 8 5 6419 97.50 1.00 1.00 0.5 28 10 3620 96.00 2.50 1.00 0.5 57 17 3221 97.49 0.01 2.00 0.5 48 15 2822 97.45 0.05 2.00 0.5 18 7 4223 97.40 0.10 2.00 0.5 12 6 6124 96.50 1.00 2.00 0.5 45 14 2925 95.00 2.50 2.00 0.5 91 33 21______________________________________
EXAMPLE 19
SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient was combined with Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 as the second ingredient, MoO.sub.3 as the third ingredient, and GeO.sub.2 as the fourth ingredient. In various sets of proportions these ingredients were processed into ceramic discs, and further into varistors, through the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1 except that the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment was 1000.degree. C. TABLE 19 lists the proportions of the above four ingredients, together with the E.sub.10, .alpha., and C of the varistors made therefrom, as measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1.
TABLE 19______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 MoO.sub.3 GeO.sub.2 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.48 0.01 0.01 0.5 5 4 1312 99.44 0.05 0.01 0.5 3 4 1433 99.39 0.10 0.01 0.5 2 4 1544 98.49 1.00 0.01 0.5 5 4 1305 96.99 2.50 0.01 0.5 12 6 1106 99.44 0.01 0.05 0.5 7 5 1237 99.40 0.05 0.05 0.5 3 4 1458 99.35 0.10 0.05 0.5 2 4 1619 98.45 1.00 0.05 0.5 6 5 12910 96.95 2.50 0.05 0.5 14 7 10511 99.39 0.01 0.10 0.5 8 5 11612 99.35 0.05 0.10 0.5 4 4 13913 99.30 0.10 0.10 0.5 3 4 14414 98.40 1.00 0.10 0.5 7 6 12115 96.90 2.50 0.10 0.5 16 8 10116 98.49 0.01 1.00 0.5 21 9 9317 98.45 0.05 1.00 0.5 11 6 10618 98.40 0.10 1.00 0.5 5 4 13719 97.50 1.00 1.00 0.5 18 8 9920 96.00 2.50 1.00 0.5 42 14 6321 94.49 0.01 5.00 0.5 39 12 7222 94.45 0.05 5.00 0.5 20 9 9623 94.40 0.10 5.00 0.5 13 7 10624 93.50 1.00 5.00 0.5 33 11 7925 92.00 2.50 5.00 0.5 78 27 46______________________________________
EXAMPLE 20
SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient was combined with Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 as the second ingredient, MnO.sub.2 as the third ingredient, and GeO.sub.2 as the fourth ingredient. In various sets of proportions these ingredients were processed into ceramic discs, and further into varistors, through the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1 except that the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment was 1000.degree. C. TABLE 20 lists the proportions of the above four ingredients, together with the E.sub.10, .alpha., and C of the varistors made therefrom, as measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 1.
TABLE 20______________________________________Test Composition in percent PropertiesNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 MnO.sub.2 GeO.sub.2 E.sub.10, V .alpha. C, nF______________________________________1 99.48 0.01 0.01 0.5 9 5 1212 99.44 0.05 0.01 0.5 5 4 1303 99.39 0.10 0.01 0.5 2 4 1414 98.49 1.00 0.01 0.5 6 5 1255 96.99 2.50 0.01 0.5 11 5 1156 99.44 0.01 0.05 0.5 12 6 1097 99.40 0.05 0.05 0.5 6 4 1238 99.35 0.10 0.05 0.5 3 4 1359 98.45 1.00 0.05 0.5 8 5 11510 96.95 2.50 0.05 0.5 13 6 10511 99.39 0.01 0.10 0.5 14 7 10312 99.35 0.05 0.10 0.5 8 5 11313 99.30 0.10 0.10 0.5 3 4 13914 98.40 1.00 0.10 0.5 10 5 11015 96.90 2.50 0.10 0.5 18 7 9616 98.49 0.01 1.00 0.5 42 15 7117 98.45 0.05 1.00 0.5 24 8 8918 98.40 0.10 1.00 0.5 9 5 12019 97.50 1.00 1.00 0.5 28 10 8920 96.00 2.50 1.00 0.5 52 19 6621 96.99 0.01 2.50 0.5 72 30 4822 96.95 0.05 2.50 0.5 41 14 6223 96.90 0.10 2.50 0.5 17 7 9624 96.00 1.00 2.50 0.5 47 16 5925 94.50 2.50 2.50 0.5 90 36 33______________________________________
EXAMPLE 21
SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient and CuO as the third ingredient were variously combined with a second ingredient selected from the group of Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5, WO.sub.3, La.sub.2 O.sub.3, Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3, Y.sub.2 O.sub.3, CeO.sub.2, Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5, Pr.sub.6 O.sub.11, Nd.sub.2 O.sub.3, and Sm.sub.2 O.sub.3, and with a fourth ingredient selected from the group of B.sub.2 O.sub.3, ZnO, PbO, and GeO.sub.2. This EXAMPLE was intended to prove that B.sub.2 O.sub.3, ZnO and PbO could each be used as the fourth ingredient, in place of GeO.sub.2 tested in some foregoing EXAMPLES. It was also intended to ascertain the allowable range of percentages in which the fourth ingredient might be used to provide ceramic materials suitable for varistors.
Various combinations of four selected ingredients, each in various sets of proportions, were processed into ceramic discs through the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1 except that the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment was 1000.degree. C. TABLES 21A through 21S represent the various combinations and proportions of the above ingredients, as well as the resistivities of the corresponding ceramic bodies, as measured by the four-probe method.
The resistivity of each ceramic body serves as a measure of its utility as a semiconductor. Conventional SrTiO.sub.3 ceramic materials, for use in capacitors, had a resistivity of more than 10.sup.10 ohm-cm in general. Contrastively, as will be noted from TABLES 21A through 21S, the ceramic bodies of this invention have all a resistivity of less than 10.sup.6 ohm-cm and thus are sufficiently semiconductive and suitable for varistors.
Experiment has also proved that if the content of the fourth ingredient in each composition is less than about 0.01%, it hardly serves the purpose of improving the coherency of the ceramic bodies prepared therefrom. Should the proportion of the fourth ingredient exceed about 4.00%, on the other hand, the resistivity of the ceramic bodies will become too high, making them unsuitable for varistors. Thus the proportion of the fourth ingredient should range from about 0.01 to about 4.00%, preferably from about 0.5 to about 1.0%.
TABLE 21A______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO B.sub.2 O.sub.3 ohm-cm______________________________________1 99.485 0.005 0.5 0.01 6 .times. 10.sup.-12 98.995 0.005 0.5 0.50 13 .times. 10.sup.-13 95.495 0.005 0.5 4.00 19 .times. 10.sup.-14 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 2 .times. 10.sup.-15 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 5 .times. 10.sup.-16 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 7 .times. 10.sup.-17 96.99 2.50 0.5 0.01 9 .times. 10.sup.-18 96.50 2.50 0.5 0.50 20 .times. 10.sup.-19 93.00 2.50 0.5 4.00 31 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21B______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 WO.sub.3 CuO B.sub.2 O.sub.3 ohm-cm______________________________________10 99.48 0.01 0.5 0.01 6 .times. 10.sup.-111 98.99 0.01 0.5 0.50 13 .times. 10.sup.-112 95.49 0.01 0.5 4.00 19 .times. 10.sup.-113 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 2 .times. 10.sup.-114 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 5 .times. 10.sup.-115 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 7 .times. 10.sup.-116 94.49 5.00 0.5 0.01 9 .times. 10.sup.-117 94.00 5.00 0.5 0.50 20 .times. 10.sup.-118 95.50 5.00 0.5 4.00 31 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21C______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO B.sub.2 O.sub.3 ohm-cm______________________________________19 99.48 0.01 0.5 0.01 5 .times. 10.sup.-120 98.99 0.01 0.5 0.50 7 .times. 10.sup.-121 95.49 0.01 0.5 4.00 17 .times. 10.sup.-122 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 2 .times. 10.sup.-123 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 4 .times. 10.sup.-124 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 6 .times. 10.sup.-125 96.99 2.50 0.5 0.01 4 .times. 10.sup.-126 96.50 2.50 0.5 0.50 6 .times. 10.sup.-127 93.00 2.50 0.5 4.00 13 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21D______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO B.sub.2 O.sub.3 ohm-cm______________________________________28 99.48 0.01 0.5 0.01 7 .times. 10.sup.-129 98.99 0.01 0.5 0.50 13 .times. 10.sup.-130 95.49 0.01 0.5 4.00 23 .times. 10.sup.-131 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 3 .times. 10.sup.-132 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 5 .times. 10.sup.-133 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 11 .times. 10.sup.-134 96.99 2.50 0.5 0.01 6 .times. 10.sup.-135 96.50 2.50 0.5 0.50 11 .times. 10.sup.-136 93.00 2.50 0.5 4.00 20 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21E______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO B.sub.2 O.sub.3 ohm-cm______________________________________37 99.48 0.01 0.5 0.01 7 .times. 10.sup.-138 98.99 0.01 0.5 0.50 12 .times. 10.sup.-139 95.49 0.01 0.5 4.00 24 .times. 10.sup.-140 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 2 .times. 10.sup.-141 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 3 .times. 10.sup.-142 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 7 .times. 10.sup.-143 95.49 4.00 0.5 0.01 7 .times. 10.sup.-144 95.00 4.00 0.5 0.50 12 .times. 10.sup.-145 91.50 4.00 0.5 4.00 25 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21F______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 CeO.sub.2 CuO ZnO ohm-cm______________________________________46 99.48 0.01 0.5 0.01 8 .times. 10.sup.-147 98.99 0.01 0.5 0.50 15 .times. 10.sup.-148 95.49 0.01 0.5 4.00 33 .times. 10.sup.-149 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 5 .times. 10.sup.-150 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 10 .times. 10.sup.-151 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 21 .times. 10.sup.-152 95.49 4.00 0.5 0.01 9 .times. 10.sup.-153 95.00 4.00 0.5 0.50 17 .times. 10.sup.-154 91.50 4.00 0.5 4.00 35 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21G______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO ZnO ohm-cm______________________________________55 99.48 0.01 0.5 0.01 7 .times. 10.sup.-156 98.99 0.01 0.5 0.50 13 .times. 10.sup.-157 95.49 0.01 0.5 4.00 27 .times. 10.sup.-158 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 4 .times. 10.sup.-159 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 9 .times. 10.sup.-160 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 16 .times. 10.sup.-161 96.99 2.50 0.5 0.01 6 .times. 10.sup.-162 96.50 2.50 0.5 0.50 12 .times. 10.sup.-163 93.00 2.50 0.5 4.00 25 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21H______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 WO.sub.3 CuO ZnO ohm-cm______________________________________64 99.48 0.01 0.5 0.01 5 .times. 10.sup.-165 98.99 0.01 0.5 0.50 9 .times. 10.sup.-166 95.49 0.01 0.5 4.00 20 .times. 10.sup.-167 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 2 .times. 10.sup.-168 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 4 .times. 10.sup.-169 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 8 .times. 10.sup.-170 94.49 5.00 0.5 0.01 4 .times. 10.sup.-171 94.00 5.00 0.5 0.50 8 .times. 10.sup.-172 90.50 5.00 0.5 4.00 16 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21I______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO ZnO ohm-cm______________________________________73 99.485 0.005 0.5 0.01 9 .times. 10.sup.-174 98.995 0.005 0.5 0.50 17 .times. 10.sup.-175 95.495 0.005 0.5 4.00 36 .times. 10.sup.-176 99.44 0.05 0.5 0.01 4 .times. 10.sup.-177 98.95 0.05 0.5 0.50 8 .times. 10.sup.-178 95.45 0.05 0.5 4.00 15 .times. 10.sup.-179 96.99 2.50 0.5 0.01 13 .times. 10.sup.-180 96.50 2.50 0.5 0.50 24 .times. 10.sup.-181 93.00 2.50 0.5 4.00 48 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21J______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO PbO ohm-cm______________________________________82 99.485 0.005 0.5 0.01 7 .times. 10.sup.-183 98.995 0.005 0.5 0.50 15 .times. 10.sup.-184 95.495 0.005 0.5 4.00 31 .times. 10.sup.-185 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 4 .times. 10.sup.-186 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 8 .times. 10.sup.-187 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 18 .times. 10.sup.-188 96.99 2.50 0.5 0.01 10 .times. 10.sup.-189 96.50 2.50 0.5 0.50 21 .times. 10.sup.-190 93.00 2.50 0.5 4.00 45 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21K______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO PbO ohm-cm______________________________________91 99.48 0.01 0.5 0.01 21 .times. 10.sup.-192 98.99 0.01 0.5 0.50 44 .times. 10.sup.-193 95.49 0.01 0.5 4.00 96 .times. 10.sup.-194 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 7 .times. 10.sup.-195 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 15 .times. 10.sup.-196 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 30 .times. 10.sup.-197 94.49 5.00 0.5 0.01 18 .times. 10.sup.-198 94.00 5.00 0.5 0.50 39 .times. 10.sup.-199 90.50 5.00 0.5 4.00 81 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21L______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Pr.sub.6 O.sub.11 CuO PbO ohm-cm______________________________________100 99.489 0.001 0.5 0.01 8 .times. 10.sup.-1101 98.999 0.001 0.5 0.50 17 .times. 10.sup.-1102 95.499 0.001 0.5 4.00 39 .times. 10.sup.-1103 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 4 .times. 10.sup.-1104 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 9 .times. 10.sup.-1105 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 18 .times. 10.sup.-1106 96.99 2.50 0.5 0.01 7 .times. 10.sup.-1107 96.50 2.50 0.5 0.50 16 .times. 10.sup.-1108 93.00 2.50 0.5 4.00 32 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21M______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nd.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO PbO ohm-cm______________________________________109 99.48 0.01 0.5 0.01 8 .times. 10.sup.-1110 98.99 0.01 0.5 0.50 16 .times. 10.sup.-1111 95.49 0.01 0.5 4.00 36 .times. 10.sup.-1112 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 3 .times. 10.sup.-1113 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 6 .times. 10.sup.-1114 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 13 .times. 10.sup.-1115 95.49 4.00 0.5 0.01 7 .times. 10.sup.-1116 95.00 4.00 0.5 0.50 15 .times. 10.sup.-1117 91.50 4.00 0.5 4.00 33 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21N______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Sm.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO PbO ohm-cm______________________________________118 99.48 0.01 0.5 0.01 9 .times. 10.sup.-1119 98.99 0.01 0.5 0.50 20 .times. 10.sup.-1120 95.49 0.01 0.5 4.00 41 .times. 10.sup.-1121 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 3 .times. 10.sup.-1122 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 6 .times. 10.sup.-1123 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 11 .times. 10.sup.-1124 96.49 3.00 0.5 0.01 10 .times. 10.sup.-1125 96.00 3.00 0.5 0.50 23 .times. 10.sup.-1126 92.50 3.00 0.5 4.00 46 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21-O______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO GeO.sub.2 ohm-cm______________________________________127 99.485 0.005 0.5 0.01 8 .times. 10.sup.-1128 98.995 0.005 0.5 0.50 17 .times. 10.sup.-1129 95.495 0.005 0.5 4.00 33 .times. 10.sup.-1130 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 4 .times. 10.sup.-1131 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 9 .times. 10.sup.-1132 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 18 .times. 10.sup.-1133 96.99 2.50 0.5 0.01 11 .times. 10.sup.-1134 96.50 2.50 0.5 0.50 25 .times. 10.sup.-1135 93.00 2.50 0.5 4.00 45 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21P______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO GeO.sub.2 ohm-cm______________________________________136 99.48 0.01 0.5 0.01 29 .times. 10.sup.-1137 98.99 0.01 0.5 0.50 57 .times. 10.sup.-1138 95.49 0.01 0.5 4.00 122 .times. 10.sup.-1139 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 10 .times. 10.sup.-1140 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 24 .times. 10.sup.-1141 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 46 .times. 10.sup.-1142 94.49 5.00 0.5 0.01 24 .times. 10.sup.-1143 94.00 5.00 0.5 0.50 53 .times. 10.sup.-1144 90.50 5.00 0.5 4.00 103 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21Q______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 CeO.sub.2 CuO GeO.sub.2 ohm-cm______________________________________145 99.48 0.01 0.5 0.01 9 .times. 10.sup.-1146 98.99 0.01 0.5 0.50 21 .times. 10.sup.-1147 95.49 0.01 0.5 4.00 40 .times. 10.sup.-1148 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 6 .times. 10.sup.-1149 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 13 .times. 10.sup.-1150 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 27 .times. 10.sup.-1151 95.49 4.00 0.5 0.01 8 .times. 10.sup.-1152 95.00 4.00 0.5 0.50 18 .times. 10.sup.-1153 91.50 4.00 0.5 4.00 35 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21R______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nd.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO GeO.sub.2 ohm-cm______________________________________154 99.48 0.01 0.5 0.01 10 .times. 10.sup.-1155 98.99 0.01 0.5 0.50 23 .times. 10.sup.-1156 95.49 0.01 0.5 4.00 46 .times. 10.sup.-1157 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 5 .times. 10.sup.-1158 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 11 .times. 10.sup.-1159 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 22 .times. 10.sup.-1160 95.49 4.00 0.5 0.01 9 .times. 10.sup.-1161 95.00 4.00 0.5 0.50 23 .times. 10.sup.-1162 91.50 4.00 0.5 4.00 44 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 21S______________________________________Test Composition in percent Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO GeO.sub.2 ohm-cm______________________________________163 99.48 0.01 0.5 0.01 8 .times. 10.sup.-1164 98.99 0.01 0.5 0.50 20 .times. 10.sup.-1165 95.49 0.01 0.5 4.00 37 .times. 10.sup.-1166 98.99 0.50 0.5 0.01 5 .times. 10.sup.-1167 98.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 12 .times. 10.sup.-1168 95.00 0.50 0.5 4.00 24 .times. 10.sup.-1169 95.49 4.00 0.5 0.01 11 .times. 10.sup.-1170 95.00 4.00 0.5 0.50 23 .times. 10.sup.-1171 91.50 4.00 0.5 4.00 41 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
EXAMPLE 22
Fifteen different combinations of ingredients in accordance with the invention were prepared as in TABLES 22A through 22-0, in order to make sure that two or more different metal oxides could be employed as the second, third, or fourth set of ingredients, in combination with SrTiO.sub.3 as the first ingredient. The various combinations of ingredients, each in several different sets of proportions, were processed into ceramic discs through the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1 except that the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment was 1000.degree. C. The resistivities of these ceramic bodies, measured by the same method as in EXAMPLE 21, were as given in TABLES 22A through 22-0. The tabulated results demonstrate that the ceramic bodies made with the use of two or more different metal oxides as the second, third, or fourth set of ingredients are all sufficiently semiconductive.
TABLE 22A__________________________________________________________________________Composition in percent First Second Third FourthTest ingredient ingredients ingredient ingredients Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO GeO.sub.2 PbO ZnO ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________1 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0.5 0 0 5 .times. 10.sup.-12 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0.5 0 0 7 .times. 10.sup.-13 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0.5 0 0 6 .times. 10.sup.-14 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0.5 0 7 .times. 10.sup.-15 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0.5 0 3 .times. 10.sup.-16 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0.5 0 4 .times. 10.sup.-17 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0 0.5 9 .times. 10.sup.-18 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0 0.5 11 .times. 10.sup.-19 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0 0.5 7 .times. 10.sup.-1__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 22B______________________________________ Re-Composition in percent sis- First Third tiv- ingre- Second ingre- Fourth ity,Test dient ingredients dient ingredients ohm-No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 WO.sub.3 CuO GeO.sub.2 PbO ZnO cm______________________________________10 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0.5 0 0 7 .times. 10.sup.-111 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0.5 0 0 9 .times. 10.sup.-112 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0.5 0 0 6 .times. 10.sup.-113 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0.5 0 4 .times. 10.sup.-114 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0.5 0 5 .times. 10.sup.-115 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0.5 0 4 .times. 10.sup.-116 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0 0.5 6 .times. 10.sup.-117 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0 0.5 7 .times. 10.sup.-118 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0 0.5 3 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 22C__________________________________________________________________________Composition in percent First Second Third FourthTest ingredient ingredients ingredient ingredients Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO GeO.sub.2 PbO ZnO ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________19 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0.5 0 0 8 .times. 10.sup.-120 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0.5 0 0 13 .times. 10.sup.-121 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0.5 0 0 15 .times. 10.sup.-122 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0.5 0 10 .times. 10.sup.-123 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0.5 0 16 .times. 10.sup.-124 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0.5 0 21 .times. 10.sup.-125 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0 0.5 14 .times. 10.sup.-126 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0 0.5 15 .times. 10.sup.-127 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0 0.5 20 .times. 10.sup.-1__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 22D__________________________________________________________________________Composition in percent First Second Third FourthTest ingredient ingredients ingredient ingredients Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CeO CuO GeO.sub.2 PbO ZnO ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________28 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0.5 0 0 14 .times. 10.sup.-129 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0.5 0 0 19 .times. 10.sup.-130 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0.5 0 0 11 .times. 10.sup.-131 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0.5 0 23 .times. 10.sup.-132 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0.5 0 21 .times. 10.sup.-133 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0.5 0 13 .times. 10.sup.-134 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0 0.5 16 .times. 10.sup.-135 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0 0.5 29 .times. 10.sup.-136 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0 0.5 21 .times. 10.sup.-1__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 22E__________________________________________________________________________Composition in percent First Second Third FourthTest ingredient ingredients ingredient ingredients Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO GeO.sub.2 PbO ZnO ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________37 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0.5 0 0 8 .times. 10.sup.-138 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0.5 0 0 11 .times. 10.sup.-139 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0.5 0 0 10 .times. 10.sup.-140 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0.5 0 7 .times. 10.sup.-141 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0.5 0 9 .times. 10.sup.-142 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0.5 0 6 .times. 10.sup.-143 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0 0.5 6 .times. 10.sup.-144 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0 0.5 13 .times. 10.sup.-145 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0 0.5 9 .times. 10.sup.-1__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 22F__________________________________________________________________________Composition in percent First Second Third FourthTest ingredient ingredients ingredient ingredients Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 Ta.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO GeO.sub.2 ZnO B.sub.2 O.sub.3 ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________46 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0.5 0 0 11 .times. 10.sup.-147 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0.5 0 0 13 .times. 10.sup.-148 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0.5 0 0 15 .times. 10.sup.-149 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0.5 0 13 .times. 10.sup.-150 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0.5 0 16 .times. 10.sup.-151 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0.5 0 17 .times. 10.sup.-152 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0 0.5 13 .times. 10.sup.-153 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0 0.5 14 .times. 10.sup.-154 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0 0.5 16 .times. 10.sup.-1__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 22G______________________________________ Re-Composition in percent sis- First Third tiv- ingre- Second ingre- Fourth ity,Test dient ingredients dient ingredients ohm-No. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 WO.sub.3 CuO GeO.sub.2 ZnO B.sub.2 O.sub.3 cm______________________________________55 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0.5 0 0 12 .times. 10.sup.-156 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0.5 0 0 16 .times. 10.sup.-157 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0.5 0 0 21 .times. 10.sup.-158 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0.5 0 23 .times. 10.sup.-159 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0.5 0 24 .times. 10.sup.-160 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0.5 0 23 .times. 10.sup.-161 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0 0.5 29 .times. 10.sup.-162 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0 0.5 31 .times. 10.sup.-163 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0 0.5 30 .times. 10.sup.-1______________________________________
TABLE 22H__________________________________________________________________________Composition in percent First Second Third FourthTest ingredient ingredients ingredient ingredients Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 CeO.sub.2 CuO GeO.sub.2 ZnO B.sub.2 O.sub.3 ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________64 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0.5 0 0 26 .times. 10.sup.-165 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0.5 0 0 23 .times. 10.sup.-166 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0.5 0 0 25 .times. 10.sup.-167 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0.5 0 31 .times. 10.sup.-168 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0.5 0 30 .times. 10.sup.-169 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0.5 0 29 .times. 10.sup.-170 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0 0.5 29 .times. 10.sup.-171 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0 0.5 36 .times. 10.sup.-172 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0 0.5 35 .times. 10.sup.-1__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 22I__________________________________________________________________________Composition in percent First Second Third FourthTest ingredient ingredients ingredient ingredients Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 Nd.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO GeO.sub.2 ZnO B.sub.2 O.sub.3 ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________73 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0.5 0 0 21 .times. 10.sup.-174 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0.5 0 0 20 .times. 10.sup.-175 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0.5 0 0 18 .times. 10.sup.-176 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0.5 0 17 .times. 10.sup.-177 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0.5 0 19 .times. 10.sup.-178 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0.5 0 13 .times. 10.sup.-179 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0 0.5 22 .times. 10.sup.-180 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0 0.5 21 .times. 10.sup.-181 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0 0.5 19 .times. 10.sup.-1__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 22J__________________________________________________________________________Composition in percent First Second Third FourthTest ingredient ingredients ingredient ingredients Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 Sm.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO GeO.sub.2 ZnO B.sub.2 O.sub.3 ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________82 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0.5 0 0 29 .times. 10.sup.-183 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0.5 0 0 30 .times. 10.sup.-184 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0.5 0 0 33 .times. 10.sup.-185 98.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0.5 0 28 .times. 10.sup.-186 98.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0.5 0 32 .times. 10.sup.-187 98.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0.5 0 35 .times. 10.sup.-188 89.90 0.02 0.08 0.5 0 0 0.5 34 .times. 10.sup.-189 89.90 0.05 0.05 0.5 0 0 0.5 36 .times. 10.sup.-190 89.90 0.08 0.02 0.5 0 0 0.5 39 .times. 10.sup.-1__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 22K__________________________________________________________________________Composition in percent First Second Third FourthTest ingredient ingredients ingredients ingredient Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 WO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO Cu.sub.2 O GeO.sub.2 ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________91 98.90 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.4 0.5 9 .times. 10.sup.-192 98.90 0.1 0 0 0.25 0.25 0.5 12 .times. 10.sup.-193 98.90 0.1 0 0 0.4 0.1 0.5 6 .times. 10.sup.-194 98.90 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.4 0.5 11 .times. 10.sup.-195 98.90 0 0.1 0 0.25 0.25 0.5 13 .times. 10.sup.-196 98.90 0 0.1 0 0.4 0.1 0.5 8 .times. 10.sup.-197 98.90 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 9 .times. 10.sup.-198 98.90 0 0 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.5 9 .times. 10.sup.-199 98.90 0 0 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.5 7 .times. 10.sup.-1__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 22L__________________________________________________________________________Composition in percent First Second Third FourthTest ingredient ingredients ingredients ingredient Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 WO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 CuO MoO.sub.3 GeO.sub.2 ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________100 98.90 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.4 0.5 6 .times. 10.sup.-1101 98.90 0.1 0 0 0.25 0.25 0.5 7 .times. 10.sup.-1102 98.90 0.1 0 0 0.4 0.1 0.5 5 .times. 10.sup.-1103 98.90 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.4 0.5 7 .times. 10.sup.-1104 98.90 0 0.1 0 0.25 0.25 0.5 6 .times. 10.sup.-1105 98.90 0 0.1 0 0.4 0.1 0.5 7 .times. 10.sup.-1106 98.90 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 6 .times. 10.sup.-1107 98.90 0 0 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.5 8 .times. 10.sup.-1108 98.90 0 0 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.5 11 .times. 10.sup.-1__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 22M__________________________________________________________________________Composition in percent First Second Third FourthTest ingredient ingredients ingredients ingredient Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 WO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 MoO.sub.3 V.sub.2 O.sub.5 GeO.sub.2 ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________109 98.90 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.4 0.5 11 .times. 10.sup.-1110 98.90 0.1 0 0 0.25 0.25 0.5 13 .times. 10.sup.-1111 98.90 0.1 0 0 0.4 0.1 0.5 14 .times. 10.sup.-1112 98.90 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.4 0.5 15 .times. 10.sup.-1113 98.90 0 0.1 0 0.25 0.25 0.5 10 .times. 10.sup.-1114 98.90 0 0.1 0 0.4 0.1 0.5 11 .times. 10.sup.-1115 98.90 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 17 .times. 10.sup.-1116 98.90 0 0 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.5 14 .times. 10.sup.-1117 98.90 0 0 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.5 15 .times. 10.sup.-1__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 22N__________________________________________________________________________Composition in percent First Second Third FourthTest ingredient ingredients ingredients ingredient Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 WO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 V.sub.2 O.sub.5 CrO.sub.3 GeO.sub.2 ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________118 98.90 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.4 0.5 7 .times. 10.sup.-1119 98.90 0.1 0 0 0.25 0.25 0.5 9 .times. 10.sup.-1120 98.90 0.1 0 0 0.4 0.1 0.5 8 .times. 10.sup.-1121 98.90 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.4 0.5 3 .times. 10.sup.-1122 98.90 0 0.1 0 0.25 0.25 0.5 6 .times. 10.sup.-1123 98.90 0 0.1 0 0.4 0.1 0.5 9 .times. 10.sup.-1124 98.90 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 8 .times. 10.sup.-1125 98.90 0 0 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.5 9 .times. 10.sup.-1126 98.90 0 0 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.5 9 .times. 10.sup.-1__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 22-O__________________________________________________________________________Composition in percent First Second Third FourthTest ingredient ingredients ingredients ingredient ResistivityNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 WO.sub.3 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 CrO.sub.3 Cu.sub.2 O GeO.sub.2 ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________127 98.90 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.4 0.5 10 .times. 10.sup.-1128 98.90 0.1 0 0 0.25 0.25 0.5 9 .times. 10.sup.-1129 98.90 0.1 0 0 0.4 0.1 0.5 7 .times. 10.sup.-1130 98.90 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.4 0.5 11 .times. 10.sup.-1131 98.90 0 0.1 0 0.25 0.25 0.5 12 .times. 10.sup.-1132 98.90 0 0.1 0 0.4 0.1 0.5 11 .times. 10.sup.-1133 98.90 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 13 .times. 10.sup.-1134 98.90 0 0 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.5 11 .times. 10.sup.-1135 98.90 0 0 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.5 9 .times. 10.sup.-1__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 23
Six different combinations of four ingredients chosen in accordance with the invention, each in a fixed set of proportions, were prepared as in TABLES 23A through 23F, in order to to study the relationship between the temperatures of the oxidative heat treatment and the characteristics of the resulting ceramic bodies and varistors. The tabulated combinations of ingredients were processed into ceramic discs, and further into varistors, through the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1 except that the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment was set at various values from 700.degree. to 1170.degree. C. TABLES 23A through 23F also represent the E.sub.10, .alpha., and resistivity of the thus-fabricated ceramic bodies and varistors. The E.sub.10 of the varistors oxidatively heat-treated at 700.degree. and 800.degree. C. was not measured.
TABLE 23A__________________________________________________________________________ Temperature of PropertiesTest Composition in percent oxidative heat Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO GeO.sub.2 treatment, .degree.C. E.sub.10, V .alpha. ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________1 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 700 . . . 1 .sup. 6 .times. 10.sup.-12 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 800 . . . 1 23 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 900 4 4 4 .times. 10.sup.24 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1000 14 6 1 .times. 10.sup.35 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1100 36 17 4 .times. 10.sup.36 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1170 68 26 7 .times. 10.sup.3__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 23B__________________________________________________________________________ Temperature of PropertiesTest Composition in percent oxidative heat ResistivityNo. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 Cu.sub.2 O GeO.sub.2 treatment, .degree.C. E.sub.10, V .alpha. ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________ 7 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 700 . . . 1 .sup. 7 .times. 10.sup.-1 8 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 800 . . . 1 5 9 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 900 4 4 3 .times. 10.sup.210 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1000 17 8 2 .times. 10.sup.311 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1100 44 21 4 .times. 10.sup.312 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1170 99 35 1 .times. 10.sup.4__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 23C__________________________________________________________________________ Temperature of PropertiesTest Composition in percent oxidative heat Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 V.sub.2 O.sub.5 GeO.sub.2 treatment, .degree.C. E.sub.10, V .alpha. ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________13 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 700 . . . 1 .sup. 9 .times. 10.sup.-114 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 800 . . . 1 615 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 900 5 4 4 .times. 10.sup.216 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1000 14 6 2 .times. 10.sup.317 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1100 35 16 3 .times. 10.sup.318 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1170 67 29 7 .times. 10.sup.3__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 23D__________________________________________________________________________ Temperature of PropertiesTest Composition in percent oxidative heat Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CrO.sub.3 GeO.sub.2 treatment, .degree.C. E.sub.10, V .alpha. ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________19 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 700 . . . 1 .sup. 8 .times. 10.sup.-120 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 800 . . . 1 521 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 900 6 4 5 .times. 10.sup.222 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1000 15 7 2 .times. 10.sup.323 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1100 40 20 4 .times. 10.sup.324 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1170 82 33 8 .times. 10.sup.3__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 23E__________________________________________________________________________ Temperature of PropertiesTest Composition in percent oxidative heat Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 MoO.sub.3 GeO.sub.2 treatment, .degree.C. E.sub.10, V .alpha. ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________25 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 700 . . . 1 .sup. 6 .times. 10.sup.-126 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 800 . . . 1 327 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 900 3 4 5 .times. 10.sup.228 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1000 13 6 1 .times. 10.sup.329 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1100 41 21 4 .times. 10.sup.330 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1170 82 31 9 .times. 10.sup.3__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 23F__________________________________________________________________________ Temperature of PropertiesTest Composition in percent oxidative heat Resistivity,No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 MnO.sub.2 GeO.sub.2 treatment, .degree.C. E.sub.10, V .alpha. ohm-cm__________________________________________________________________________31 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 700 . . . 1 .sup. 8 .times. 10.sup.-132 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 800 . . . 2 333 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 900 4 4 4 .times. 10.sup.234 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1000 14 6 2 .times. 10.sup.335 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1100 39 18 4 .times. 10.sup.336 98.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 1170 89 31 8 .times. 10.sup.4__________________________________________________________________________
Based on the data given in TABLE 23A, FIG. 7 graphically represents the curve of the .alpha. of the SrTiO.sub.3 -Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 -CuO-GeO.sub.2 varistors against the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment. The graph exhibits some proportionality between the two factors, making clear that the .alpha. of the varistors can be controlled by the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment during the fabrication of the ceramic bodies. A comparison of this graph with that of FIG. 6, which plots a similar curve in the case where the ceramic composition contains no fourth ingredient, will reveal that the .alpha. of the varistors including the fourth ingredient varies less with the temperature and so is easier to control.
The curve C in the graph of FIG. 8 represents the E.sub.10 of the SrTiO.sub.3 -Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 -CuO-GeO.sub.2 varistors plotted against the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment, on the basis of the data also given in TABLE 23A. The curve indicates that the E.sub.10 of the varistors can likewise be controlled by the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment.
By way of comparison several ceramic bodies were prepared from 99.4% SrTiO.sub.3, 0.1% Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5, and 0.5% CuO, with no fourth ingredient added, by progressively varying the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment. The curve D in FIG. 8 represents the E.sub.10 of the varistors made from these ceramic bodies, plotted against the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment. As will be understood upon comparison of the curves C and D, the addition of the fourth ingredient makes less the change of E.sub.10 with temperature. When 10 SrTiO.sub.3 -Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 -CuO varistors were produced, with the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment set at 1000.degree. C., their E.sub.10 varied between 33 and 53 V, averaging 44 V. There was thus a difference of as much as 20 V between the maximum and minimum values. Contrastively, when another ten varistors were prepared by adding GeO.sub.2 as the fourth ingredient to the above composition, with the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment also set at 1000.degree. C., their E.sub.10 varied only between 12 and 16 V, averaging 14 V. Thus the addition of the fourth ingredient greatly reduces fluctuations in E.sub.10. Such reduction of fluctuations in E.sub.10 and .alpha. results, obviously, from the higher coherency of the ceramic bodies and greater uniformity of particle size, brought about by the introduction of the fourth ingredient.
When the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment was below 900.degree. C., the resistivity of the ceramic bodies became too low, and when the temperature was above 1300.degree. C., the resistivity became too high for varistors. The oxidative heat treatment should therefore be conducted in a temperature range of about 900.degree.-1300.degree. C., preferably about 900.degree.-117.degree. C.
EXAMPLE 24
Varistors incorporating a fourth ingredient were tested as to their pulse-withstanding abilities in this EXAMPLE. Ceramic discs were prepared from six different combinations of four possible ingredients given in TABLE 24, in like proportions, and were processed into varistors, through the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1 except that the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment was 1000.degree. C. As in EXAMPLE 14, 10 voltage pulses of 100 V were successively applied to each varistor, and a rate of change in E.sub.10 before and after the pulse application was computed. TABLE 24 shows the results.
TABLE 24______________________________________Composition Second First ingre- Third FourthTest ingredient dient ingredient ingredient Change inNo. (98.9%) (0.1%) (0.5%) (0.5%) E.sub.10, %______________________________________1 SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 V.sub.2 O.sub.5 GeO.sub.2 -0.052 SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CrO.sub.3 GeO.sub.2 -0.033 SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO GeO.sub.2 -0.014 SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 Cu.sub.2 O GeO.sub.2 -0.035 SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 MoO.sub.3 GeO.sub.2 -0.066 SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 MnO.sub.2 GeO.sub.2 -0.05______________________________________
EXAMPLE 25
Six different combinations of four possible ingredients in accordance with the invention, each in different sets of proportions, were prepared as in TABLES 25A through 25F. The various combinations of ingredients were processed into ceramic discs, and further into varistors, through the same procedure as in EXAMPLE 1 except that the temperature of the oxidative heat treatment was 1000.degree. C. In order to In order to examine variations in the E.sub.10 of the varistors with temperatures at which they are put to use, the temperature change Tc.sub.25-50 of the E.sub.10 of each varistor was computed from the equation, Tc.sub.25-50 =(A-B)100/A, where A is the value of E.sub.10 at 25.degree. C., and B is the value of E.sub.10 at 50.degree. C. TABLES 25A through 25F show the results.
TABLE 25A______________________________________ TemperatureTest Composition in percent change Tc.sub.25-50No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CuO GeO.sub.2 of E.sub.10, %______________________________________1 99.48 0.01 0.01 0.5 -0.072 98.99 0.01 0.50 0.5 -0.073 94.49 0.01 5.00 0.5 -0.064 99.39 0.10 0.01 0.5 -0.06 -5 98.90 0.10 0.50 0.5 -0.056 94.40 0.10 5.00 0.5 -0.057 96.99 2.5 0.01 0.5 -0.068 96.50 2.5 0.50 0.5 -0.059 92.00 2.5 5.00 0.5 -0.05______________________________________
TABLE 25B______________________________________ TemperatureTest Composition in percent change Tc.sub.25-50No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 Cu.sub.2 O GeO.sub.2 of E.sub.10, %______________________________________10 99.48 0.01 0.01 0.5 -0.0711 98.99 0.01 0.50 0.5 -0.0612 96.99 0.01 2.50 0.5 -0.0513 99.39 0.10 0.01 0.5 -0.0614 98.90 0.10 0.50 0.5 -0.0615 96.90 0.10 2.50 0.5 -0.0516 96.99 2.5 0.01 0.5 -0.0617 96.50 2.5 0.50 0.5 -0.0518 94.50 2.5 2.50 0.5 -0.05______________________________________
TABLE 25C______________________________________ TemperatureTest Composition in percent change Tc.sub.25-50No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 V.sub.2 O.sub.5 GeO.sub.2 of E.sub.10, %______________________________________19 99.48 0.01 0.01 0.5 -0.0620 98.99 0.01 0.50 0.5 -0.0621 98.49 0.01 1.00 0.5 -0.0522 99.39 0.10 0.01 0.5 -0.0523 98.90 0.10 0.50 0.5 -0.0624 98.40 0.10 1.00 0.5 -0.0725 96.99 2.5 0.01 0.5 -0.0626 96.50 2.5 0.50 0.5 -0.0627 96.00 2.5 1.00 0.5 -0.05______________________________________
TABLE 25D______________________________________ TemperatureTest Composition in percent change Tc.sub.25-50No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 CrO.sub.3 GeO.sub.2 of E.sub.10, %______________________________________28 99.48 0.01 0.01 0.5 -0.0729 98.99 0.01 0.50 0.5 -0.0630 97.49 0.01 2.00 0.5 -0.0631 99.39 0.10 0.01 0.5 -0.0732 98.90 0.10 0.50 0.5 -0.0733 97.40 0.10 2.00 0.5 -0.0534 96.99 2.5 0.01 0.5 -0.0635 96.50 2.5 0.50 0.5 -0.0736 95.00 2.5 2.00 0.5 -0.05______________________________________
TABLE 25E______________________________________ TemperatureTest Composition in percent change Tc.sub.25-50No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 MoO.sub.3 GeO.sub.2 of E.sub.10, %______________________________________37 99.48 0.01 0.01 0.5 -0.0738 98.99 0.01 0.50 0.5 -0.0639 94.49 0.01 5.00 0.5 -0.0640 99.39 0.10 0.01 0.5 -0.0741 98.90 0.10 0.50 0.5 -0.0742 94.40 0.10 5.00 0.5 -0.0643 96.99 2.50 0.01 0.5 -0.0644 96.50 2.50 0.50 0.5 -0.0545 92.00 2.50 5.00 0.5 -0.05______________________________________
TABLE 25F______________________________________ TemperatureTest Composition in percent change Tc.sub.25-50No. SrTiO.sub.3 Nb.sub.2 O.sub.5 MnO.sub.2 GeO.sub.2 of E.sub.10, %______________________________________46 99.48 0.01 0.01 0.5 -0.0747 98.99 0.01 0.50 0.5 -0.0648 96.99 0.01 2.50 0.5 -0.0649 99.39 0.10 0.01 0.5 -0.0650 98.90 0.10 0.50 0.5 -0.0651 96.90 0.10 2.50 0.5 -0.0552 96.99 2.50 0.01 0.5 -0.0553 96.50 2.50 0.50 0.5 -0.0554 94.50 2.50 2.50 0.5 -0.05______________________________________
The tabulated results all indicate little changes in the E.sub.10 of the varistors with the temperatures at which they operate. It can be concluded from this that the operating temperatures of the varistors prepared in accordance with the invention hardly affect their performance.
By way of example the E.sub.10 of the varistor of Test No. 5 in TABLE 25A was further measured at temperatures of -20.degree., 0.degree., +80.degree. and +100.degree. C. The curve E in the graph of FIG. 9 represents the relation, (A-C)100/A, of this varistor, where A is as defined above and C is the value of E.sub.10 at each of the other temperatures. The curve F in the same graph plots a similar relation of the varistor of Test No. 41 in TABLE 25E. The curves show little changes in the E.sub.10 of the exemplified varistors over a wide temperature range. Obviously, the same holds true with the other varistors manufactured in accordance with the invention.
It is to be understood that the foregoing EXAMPLES are meant purely to illustrate or explain and not to impose limitations upon the invention. Experiment has proved, for example, that alumina, silica and other additives might be used insofar as they do not impair the desire properties of the ceramic materials in accordance with the invention. It has also been confirmed that the addition of up to 1.5% bismuth trioxide, with a view to the control of particle size, firing temperature, etc., does not adversely affect the desired properties of the ceramic materials. The appended claims should therefore be construed to specify only the fundamental ingredients of the inventive ceramics.

Number	Name	Date
3933668	Takahashi et al.	Jan 1976
4191665	Mandai et al.	Mar 1980
4283753	Burn	Aug 1981
4292209	Marchant et al.	Sep 1981
4347167	Payne et al.	Aug 1982
4362637	Matsuo et al.	Dec 1982

Semiconductive ceramic compositions with a nonlinear volt-ampere characteristic, and process for preparing coherent bodies of such compositions

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (1)

US Referenced Citations (6)