1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a semiconductor device and more particularly, to a technique for preventing a malfunction as a result of a false signal generated in a level shift circuit.
2. Description of the Background Art
A power semiconductor element such as an MOSFET or an IGBT constituting a power semiconductor device is actuated by a high voltage integrated circuit (hereinafter referred to as an “HVIC”). As an example, when two power semiconductor elements of upper and lower arms constituting a half bridge inverter are to be actuated, an HVIC comprising two drive circuits is used including a high-side (high-potential island) drive circuit for driving the power semiconductor element of the upper arm, and a low-side drive circuit for driving the power semiconductor element of the lower arm. Such an HVIC comprises a so-called level shift circuit for transmitting a drive signal to the high-side drive circuit. A level shift circuit generally used includes a high voltage MOSFET (hereinafter referred to as a “HVMOS”) actuated by a drive signal, and a level shift resistor connected in series to the HVMOS. Voltage drop developed in the level shift resistor is transmitted as a high-side drive signal.
In many cases, the half bridge inverter actuated by the HVIC uses an inductive (L) load such as a motor or a fluorescent lamp. The inverter also includes a parasitic inductance in an interconnection on a printed circuit board. In a switching period of the half bridge inverter, and particularly, when the power semiconductor element of the lower arm is to be turned on, these inductances cause the midpoint potential of the half bridge connection, namely, a high-side reference potential VS of the HVIC (potential VS in
The negative noise of the high-side reference potential VS at a high level causes the following problem. That is, transition of the high-side reference potential VS to the negative side causes a high-side power supply potential VB (potential VB in
Such a malfunction may also result from a change in voltage dv/dt applied to the midpoint. When a parasitic capacitance Cp existing between the drain and source of the HVMOS of the level shift circuit connected to the high side of the HVIC experiences the change in voltage dv/dt applied from outside, the parasitic capacitance Cp is subjected to flow of a current Ip calculated by the formula:
Ip=Cp×dv/dt
The current Ip further flows into the level shift resistor, whereby voltage drop is developed in the level shift resistor. The high side of the HVIC mistakenly recognizes this voltage drop as a drive signal for the high side, thus causing the same problem as discussed above. In response, a CR filter is generally used to discriminate between a drive signal and a false signal.
In many cases, a drive signal in the HVIC includes an on pulse signal and an off pulse signal for respectively turning on and off a power semiconductor element. In this case, the level shift circuit includes a level shift circuit for on pulse signal transmission (on-level shift circuit) and a level shift circuit for off pulse signal transmission (off-level shift circuit). The foregoing recovery current and the current generated by the change in voltage dv/dt flow into each HVMOS of the on-level shift and off-level shift circuits, theoretically generating false signals in the on-level shift and off-level shift circuits in a concurrent manner. That is, elimination of signals concurrently sent from the on-level shift and off-level shift circuits results in removal of false signals, to thereby prevent a malfunction. A logic circuit using a logic filter system has been suggested which serves to prevent concurrent input of on and off pulse signals to an RS flip-flop for transmitting a drive signal to the high-side drive circuit, an exemplary technique of which is introduced in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2001-145370.
The present inventor have noted the difference in current waveform between the recovery current after generation of the negative noise and the current generated by the normal drive signal, and have suggested discrimination between a drive signal and a false signal by means of provision of a passive circuit having two types of threshold values in the level shift circuit. An example of such a technique is introduced in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2003-133927.
While a CR filter generally employed serves for removal of a false signal of a high-frequency component, it has difficulty in removing a false signal of a low-frequency component. In response, the CR may have a lowered cut-off frequency, which in turn causes a problem such as delay in transmitting a normal drive signal.
When the on-level shift and off-level shift circuits have different parasitic capacitances Cp of the HVMOS's, false signals generated in the on-level shift and off-level shift circuits do not temporally coincide with each other. As a result, the logic filter system introduced in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2001-145370 may be unable to completely remove the false signals. Design change in the HVMOS or change in resistance of the level shift resistor in the level shift circuit to control detection sensitivity of the false signal may be responsive to this problem, which changes in turn adversely affect the normal operation of the level shift circuit. The logic filter system introduced in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2001-145370 requires two level shift circuits including on-level shift and off-level shift circuits as a precondition and hence, is not applicable to the case in which a single level shift circuit is used to transmit both the on and off pulse signals.
According to the system introduced in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2003-133927, a level shift resistor is split into two resistive elements to cause resistance increase of the level shift resistor. This causes a lowered margin of malfunction in the normal operation.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a semiconductor device allowing malfunction prevention while causing no effect on the normal operation of a level shift circuit, which malfunction results from a false signal generated in the level shift circuit.
According to the present invention, the semiconductor device includes a level shift circuit, a false signal detection circuit, and a malfunction prevention circuit. The level shift circuit converts a first signal to a second signal capable of being transmitted to a target circuit in a high side. The false signal detection circuit detects generation of a false signal in the level shift circuit, to output a false signal indication signal indicating generation of the false signal. The malfunction prevention circuit receives the second signal and the false signal indication signal. The malfunction prevention circuit serves to transmit the second signal to the target circuit. The malfunction prevention circuit further serves to recognize the second signal as a false signal to stop transmission of at least part of the second signal to the target circuit while being subjected to the input of the false signal indication signal, to thereby prevent a malfunction. The level shift circuit includes a series connection of a first resistor and a first switching device receiving the first signal. The level shift circuit outputs voltage drop developed in the first resistor as the second signal. The false signal detection circuit is connected in parallel to the level shift circuit. The false signal detection circuit includes a series connection of a second resistor and a second switching device fixed to a nonconductive state in normal operation. The false signal detection circuit outputs voltage drop developed in the second resistor as the false signal indication signal.
When the second switching device is equivalent to the first switching device, for example, output of the false signal indication signal from the false signal detection circuit can be concurrent with generation of a false signal resulting from a parasitic diode or a parasitic capacitance of the first switching device. As a result, an accurate operation of the malfunction prevention circuit is provided, resulting in enhanced operational reliability. The malfunction prevention circuit is a separate circuit from the level shift circuit and hence, detection sensitivity of a malfunction can be controlled while causing no effect on the normal operation of the level shift circuit.
These and other objects, features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of the present invention when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The HVIC comprises a drive signal generation circuit 1 for generating a drive signal (including on and off pulse signals) as a first signal for actuating the power semiconductor element 100 of the upper arm. This drive signal is sent to a level shift circuit 2 for conversion (level shifting) to a second signal which can be transmitted to each circuit in a high side. A false signal detection circuit 3 detects generation of a false signal at the level shift circuit 2, and outputs a false signal indication signal SD to a malfunction prevention circuit 4 during generation of the false signal. The malfunction prevention circuit 4 sends the drive signal after being subjected to level shifting at the level shift circuit 2 to a drive circuit (target circuit) 5. When the false signal indication signal SD is sent from the false signal detection circuit 3, the malfunction prevention circuit 4 recognizes the signal sent from the level shift circuit 2 as a false signal, and stops transmission thereof to the drive circuit 5. With reference to
A drive signal generation circuit 11 serves to generate a drive signal for actuating the power semiconductor element 101 of the lower arm. The generated drive signal is directly sent to a drive circuit 15. With reference to
In the semiconductor device shown in
The on-level shift circuit includes a series connection of a level shift resistor 21a and an HVMOS 22a as a first switching device, and a NOT gate 25a connected to one end of the level shift resistor 21a. Reference numerals 23a and 24a in
The off-level shift circuit includes a series connection of a level shift resistor 21b and an HVMOS 22b as the first switching device, and a NOT gate 25b connected to one end of the level shift resistor 21b. Reference numerals 23b and 24b in
The false signal detection circuit 3 includes a series connection of a false signal detecting resistor 31 and an HVMOS 32 as a second switching device, and a NOT gate 35 connected to one end of the false signal detecting resistor 31. Reference numerals 33 and 34 in
As seen from
Next, it will be discussed how a malfunction is prevented in the semiconductor device of the first preferred embodiment. First, it is assumed that a high-side reference potential VS experiences a negative noise at a high level. As discussed in the description of the background art, recovery of the high-side reference potential VS is accompanied by a recovery current as a result of turn-off of the parasitic diodes 23a and 23b in the level shift circuit 2, thereby causing voltage drops in the level shift resistors 21a and 21b reaching respective threshold values of the NOT gates 25a and 25b. As a result, a false signal is outputted from the level shift circuit 2.
The false signal detection circuit 3 is connected in parallel to the level shift circuit 2, and has the same configuration as those of the on-level shift and off-level shift circuits constituting the level shift circuit 2. Accordingly, recovery of the high-side reference potential VS from the negative noise also causes a recovery current to flow into the parasitic diode 33 of the HVMOS 32 as well as in the parasitic diodes 23a and 23b. The recovery current in the false signal detection circuit 3 passes through the false signal detecting resistor 31. The false signal detecting resistor 31 hence experiences voltage drop which temporally coincides with generation of the false signal at the level shift circuit 2. That is, voltage drop in the false signal detecting resistor 31 is operative to function as the false signal indication signal SD indicating false signal generation. The false signal indication signal SD is sent through the NOT gate 35 to the malfunction prevention circuit 4.
It is also assumed that the parasitic capacitances 24a and 24b of the HVMOS's 22a and 22b in the level shift circuit 2 are subjected to flow of a current as a result of a change in voltage dv/dt applied to the midpoint of the half bridge connection, which current will be referred to as a “current dv/dt”. When the current dv/dt causes voltage drops in the level shift resistors 21a and 21b, reaching the respective threshold values of the NOT gates 25a and 25b, a false signal is outputted from the level shift circuit 2.
As discussed, the false signal detection circuit 3 is connected in parallel to the level shift circuit 2, and has the same configuration as those of the on-level shift and off-level shift circuits constituting the level shift circuit 2. Accordingly, the parasitic capacitance 34 is also subjected to flow of the current dv/dt concurrently with flow of the current dv/dt in the parasitic capacitances 24a and 24b. The current dv/dt in the false signal detection circuit 3 passes through the false signal detecting resistor 31. Accordingly, the false signal detecting resistor 31 also experiences voltage drop which temporally coincides with generation of the false signal at the level shift circuit 2. That is, the false signal indication signal SD is also outputted in the case of generation of the false signal resulting from the current dv/dt.
As discussed, the false signal indication signal SD outputted from the false signal detection circuit 3 is indicative of generation of both the false signal in the level shift circuit 2 resulting from the recovery current flowing in the parasitic diodes, and the false signal resulting from the current dv/dt.
When the false signal indication signal SD is sent from the false signal detection circuit 3, the malfunction prevention circuit 4 recognizes the signal sent from the level shift circuit 2 as a false signal, and stops transmission thereof to the drive circuit 5. As a result, the power semiconductor element 100 is protected from malfunction.
In the first preferred embodiment, the malfunction prevention circuit 4 comprises a logic portion 41 and an RS flip-flop 42.
When the level shift circuit 2 is in the normal operation experiencing no generation of a false signal, no input of the false signal indication signal SD occurs from the false signal detection circuit 3 (the false signal indication signal SD is placed at a low level). The on and off pulse signals transmitted to the logic portion 41 are hence directly sent to the S and R inputs of the RS flip-flop 42, respectively, thereafter entering the drive circuit 5 through the RS flip-flop 42.
When the false signal is generated in the level shift circuit 2 as a result of the recovery current flowing through the parasitic diodes 23a and 23b, or the current dv/dt flowing through the parasitic capacitances 24a and 24b, the false signal indication signal SD is sent to the logic portion 41 (the false signal indication signal SD is placed at a high level) concurrently with generation of the false signal. When the false signal indication signal SD is at a high level, the signal sent from the level shift circuit 2 (false signal) is subjected to masking at the AND gates 1 and 2, and hence, is not transmitted to the RS flip-flop 42. Malfunction resulting from the false signal generated in the level shift circuit 2 is thereby prevented.
The circuit configuration of the malfunction prevention circuit 4 shown in
In the first preferred embodiment, detection sensitivity of the false signal at the false signal detection circuit 3 can be easily controlled by adjusting the impedance of the false signal detecting resistor 31 or the threshold value of the NOT gate 35. As an example, false signal generation differs in time between the on-level shift and off-level shift circuits due to different values of the parasitic capacitances 24a and 24b, enhanced detection sensitivity of the false signal at the false signal detection circuit 3 serves to compensate for such a time lag. Design change of a circuit confirmation may be responsible for enhancement in detection sensitivity of the false signal such as increase in impedance of the false signal detecting resistor 31 or increase in threshold value of the NOT gate 35. At this time, each constituent element of the level shift circuit 2 is not required to be subjected to design change, whereby the detection sensitivity of the false signal is controlled while causing no effect on the normal operation of the level shift circuit 2. As a result, false signal elimination with a high degree of precision is allowed with no degeneration in reliability of the normal operation of the semiconductor device.
In a semiconductor device according to a second preferred embodiment of the present invention, the configuration shown in
With reference to
The diode 36 is the same in electrical characteristic as the parasitic diodes 23a and 23b. The capacitor 37 is the same in electrical characteristic as the parasitic capacitances 24a and 24b. Accordingly, the false signal detection circuit 3 of the second preferred embodiment outputs the false signal indication signal SD which is operative in the same manner as the one in the first preferred embodiment, namely, the false signal indication signal SD indicative of generation of both the false signal in the level shift circuit 2 resulting from the recovery current flowing in the parasitic diodes, and the false signal resulting from the current dv/dt flowing in the parasitic capacitances.
As discussed, the second preferred embodiment realizes malfunction prevention in the same manner as in the first preferred embodiment, thereby producing the same effect. The second preferred embodiment characteristically replaces the HVMOS 32 required in the first preferred embodiment with the diode 36 and the capacitor 37, thus providing enhanced flexibility in circuit design. Still advantageously, circuit design in the second preferred embodiment allows the capacitor 37 to be independently modified in value, whereby the detection sensitivity at the false signal detection circuit 3 can be controlled with a higher degree of ease.
When the level shift circuit 2 is in the normal operation experiencing no generation of a false signal, no input of the false signal indication signal SD occurs from the false signal detection circuit 3 (the false signal indication signal SD is placed at a low level). The on and off pulse signals transmitted to the logic portion 41 are hence directly sent to the S and R inputs of the RS flip-flop 42, respectively, thereafter entering the drive circuit 5 through the RS flip-flop 42.
When the false signal indication signal SD is sent to the logic portion 41 (the false signal indication signal SD is placed at a high level), the on pulse signal transmitted from the level shift circuit 2 is subjected to masking at the AND gate 3, and hence, is not sent to the RS flip-flop 42. Accordingly, a false signal does not cause the power semiconductor element 100 to be turned on by means of the drive circuit 5, while it may cause the power semiconductor element 100 to be turned off.
As an example, a device such as a single-phase half bridge driver only requires that “no short circuit occurs” as a minimum requirement for malfunction prevention. The third preferred embodiment applied to such a device realizes malfunction prevention.
As seen from the comparison with
The circuit configuration of the malfunction prevention circuit 4 shown in
When the level shift circuit 2 is in the normal operation experiencing no generation of a false signal, no input of the false signal indication signal SD occurs from the false signal detection circuit 3 (the false signal indication signal SD is placed at a low level). The on and off pulse signals transmitted to the logic portion 41 are hence directly sent to the S and R inputs of the RS flip-flop 42, respectively, thereafter entering the drive circuit 5 through the RS flip-flop 42.
When the false signal indication signal SD is sent to the logic portion 41 (the false signal indication signal SD is placed at a high level), the false signal indication signal SD is sent as the off pulse signal to the RS flip-flop 42. Accordingly, generation of a false signal necessarily brings the power semiconductor element 100 to an off state (nonconductive state) by means of the drive circuit 5.
The fourth preferred embodiment also realizes malfunction prevention when applied to a device only requiring that “no short circuit occurs”. As seen from the comparison with
The circuit configuration of the malfunction prevention circuit 4 shown in
With reference to
When the level shift circuit 2 is in the normal operation experiencing no generation of a false signal, no input of the false signal indication signal SD occurs from the false signal detection circuit 3 (the false signal indication signal SD is placed at a low level). The on and off pulse signals transmitted to the logic portion 41 are hence directly sent to the S and R inputs of the RS flip-flop 42, respectively, thereafter entering the drive circuit 5 through the RS flip-flop 42. When the on and off pulse signals are concurrently sent to the logic portion 41, a logic filter formed by the AND gates 6, 7, 8 and the NOT gate 4 becomes operative to recognize these pulse signals as false signals, to thereby stop transmission of these signals to the RS flip-flop 42. As a result, false signals concurrently generated in the on-level shift and off-level shift circuits do not cause a malfunction.
When the false signal indication signal SD is sent to the logic portion 41 (the false signal indication signal SD is placed at a high level), the signal sent from the level shift circuit 2 (false signal) is subjected to masking at the AND gates 4 and 5 and hence, is not sent to the foregoing logic filter. A malfunction resulting from the false signal generated in the level shift circuit 2 is thereby prevented.
As discussed, the present invention combined with the logic filter system allows malfunction prevention with a higher degree of reliability.
In the configuration shown in
In the foregoing preferred embodiments, the level shift circuit 2 has been described as a combination of two level shift circuits for respectively handle the on and off pulse signals. In general, the on and off pulses are alternately sent. In view of this, a single level shift circuit receiving a pulse signal including both the on and off pulses also serves to actuate the high side of the HVIC by recognizing odd-numbered pulses as the on pulses, and even-numbered pulses as the off pulses, for example.
The level shift circuit 20 is formed by a single level shift circuit. That is, the level shift circuit 20 includes a series connection of a level shift resistor 201 and an HVMOS 202 as the first switching device, and a NOT gate 205 connected to one end of the level shift resistor 201. Reference numerals 203 and 204 in
The false signal detection circuit 3 in the sixth preferred embodiment has the same configuration as that of the first preferred embodiment, and hence, the description thereof is omitted. As seen from
As a result, the false signal indication signal SD outputted from the false signal detection circuit 3 is indicative of generation of both the false signal in the level shift circuit 20 resulting from the recovery current flowing in the parasitic diode, and the false signal resulting from the current dv/dt.
The malfunction prevention circuit 40 receiving the false signal indication signal SD recognizes the signal sent from the level shift circuit 20 as a false signal while being subjected to the input of the false signal indication signal SD from the false signal detection circuit 3, and stops transmission thereof to the drive circuit 5. The power semiconductor element 100 is hence protected from malfunction. In the sixth preferred embodiment, the malfunction prevention circuit 40 comprises a logic portion 401, and a T flip-flop 402 operative to serve as a frequency divider.
When the level shift circuit 20 is in the normal operation experiencing no generation of a false signal, no input of the false signal indication signal SD occurs from the false signal detection circuit 3 (the false signal indication signal SD is placed at a low level). The on/off pulse signal transmitted to the logic portion 401 is hence directly sent to the T flip-flop 402, thereafter entering the drive circuit 5 through the T flip-flop 402.
When the false signal indication signal SD is sent to the logic portion 401 (the false signal indication signal SD is placed at a high level), the signal sent from the level shift circuit 20 (false signal) is subjected to masking at the AND gate 14, and is not sent to the T flip-flop 402. A malfunction resulting from the false signal generated in the level shift circuit 20 is thereby prevented.
As discussed, the logic filter system introduced in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2001-145370 is not applicable to the case in which a single level shift circuit is used to transmit a pulse signal including both the on and off pulses, whereas the present invention can be applied to such a case. As seen from the comparison between
The circuit configuration of the malfunction prevention circuit 40 shown in
Accordingly, the false signal indication signal SD outputted from the false signal detection circuit 3 is indicative of generation of both the false signal in the level shift circuit 20 resulting from the recovery current flowing in the parasitic diode, and the false signal resulting from the current dv/dt.
The seventh preferred embodiment is hence operative in the same manner for malfunction prevention as the sixth preferred embodiment, to thereby produce the same effect. The seventh preferred embodiment characteristically replaces the HVMOS 32 required in the sixth preferred embodiment with the diode 36 and the capacitor 37, thus providing enhanced flexibility in circuit design. Still advantageously, circuit design in the seventh preferred embodiment allows the capacitor 37 to be independently modified in value, whereby the detection sensitivity at the false signal detection circuit 3 can be controlled with a higher degree of ease.
While the invention has been shown and described in detail, the foregoing description is in all aspects illustrative and not restrictive. It is therefore understood that numerous modifications and variations can be devised without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
JP2003-416164 | Dec 2003 | JP | national |