1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates in general to a semiconductor device, such as an MOS transistor, in which there is compensation for the drop in the threshold voltage (Vth) due to the short-channel effects, and to a process for fabrication of such a semiconductor device.
2. Description of the Related Art
For a given nominal channel length (L) of a transistor, the threshold voltage (Vth) drops suddenly, in particular for short-channel transistors (i.e., those having a channel length of less than 0.25 μm and typically a channel length, L, of about 0.18 μm).
The threshold voltage of a semiconductor device such as an MOS transistor, in particular a short-channel device, is a critical parameter of the device. This is because the leakage current of the device (for example, of the transistor) depends strongly on the threshold voltage. Taking into consideration current supply voltages and those envisaged in the future (from 0.9 to 1.8 volts) for such devices and the permitted leakage currents (Ioff of approximately 1 nA/μm), the threshold voltage Vth must have values of approximately 0.2 to 0.25 volts.
The sudden voltage drop (or roll-off) in the zones of the channel region of the semiconductor device results in dispersion of the electrical characteristics of the device and makes it difficult to obtain the desired threshold voltages.
To remedy this threshold voltage roll-off in semiconductor devices such as MOS transistors, it has been proposed, as described in the article “Self-Aligned Control of Threshold Voltages in Sub-0.02-μm MOSFETs” by Hajima Kurata and Toshihiro Sugii, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 45, No. Oct. 10, 1998, to form, in the channel region, pockets adjacent to the source and drain region junctions that have a conductivity of the same type as the substrate; but in which, the dopant concentration is greater than that of the substrate.
Although this solution reduces the threshold voltage roll-off gradient in the channel region, the short-channel effects lead to a more rapid roll-off of the threshold voltage, Vth, than the increase in the threshold voltage that can be obtained by incorporating the compensation pockets of the prior art.
Consequently, although these compensation pockets allow partial local compensation for the roll-off of the threshold voltage, Vth, it is not possible to obtain complete compensation for the roll-off over the entire channel region range desired.
Therefore a semiconductor device, such as an MOS transistor, that remedies the drawbacks of the devices of the prior art may be desired.
More particularly, a semiconductor device, such as an MOS transistor, whose voltage threshold roll-off due to the short-channel effects is almost fully compensated for may be desired. This makes it possible to achieve channel lengths which are arbitrarily small but non-zero.
Also a semiconductor device, such as an MOS transistor, may have a constant threshold voltage, Vth, when the channel length, L, decreases down to very small effective channel lengths, for example, 0.025 μm or less.
A process for fabricating a semiconductor device may apply to devices having channels of arbitrarily small length, these being, moreover, technologically realizable.
A semiconductor device is described that may have a semiconductor substrate with a predetermined concentration, Ns, of a dopant of a first conductivity type. The device may have source and drain regions which are doped with a dopant of a second conductivity type, which is opposite of the first conductivity type. Junctions delimiting a channel region of predetermined nominal length, LN, may be defined in the substrate. A first pocket adjacent to each of the junctions and having a predetermined length, Lp, may be defined. The first pockets may be doped with a dopant of the first conductivity type but with a local concentration, Np, which locally increases the net concentration in the substrate. The device may include at least one second pocket located adjacent to each of the junctions and stacked against each of the first pockets. These second pockets may have a length, Ln, such that Ln>Lp. The second pockets may be doped with a dopant of the second conductivity type and have a concentration, Nn, such that Nn<Np. This may locally decrease the net concentration of the substrate without changing the conductivity type.
In an embodiment, the second pockets include a plurality of elementary pockets stacked against one another. Each elementary pocket of a given rank, i, may have a predetermined length, Lni, and a predetermined concentration, Nni, of a dopant of the second conductivity type satisfying the following relationships:
In other words, the second pockets decrease the net concentration of dopant of the first conductivity type both in the first pockets and in the channel region. However, they do not change the conductivity type of the first pockets nor of the channel region.
A process for fabricating a semiconductor device as defined above is described. The process may include the formation of a source region and of a drain region in a semiconductor substrate having a predetermined concentration, Ns, of a dopant of a first conductivity type. The source region and the drain region may be doped with a dopant of a second conductivity type, which is opposite of the first conductivity type. The source and drain regions may form one or more junctions in the substrate such that the junctions delimit between them a channel region. The channel region may have a predetermined nominal length, LN. In the channel region in a zone adjacent to each of the junctions, one or more first pockets may be formed having a predetermined length, Lp, and a predetermined concentration, Np. This may locally increase the net concentration in the substrate above Ns. The process may furthermore include the implantation, in the channel region, of a dopant of the second conductivity type, which is opposite of the first conductivity type. This may be done under a set of conditions such that at least one second pocket is formed in the channel region. Each second pocket may be stacked against each of the first pockets, respectively. The second pocket may have a length, Ln, such that Ln>Lp, and a concentration, Nn, of a dopant of the first type such that Nn<Np. This may locally decrease the net concentration in the substrate, without changing the conductivity type.
In a preferred embodiment, the implantation of the dopant of the second conductivity type consists of a series of successive implantations under a set of conditions such that the second pockets formed each consist of a plurality of elementary pockets stacked against one another. Each elementary pocket of a given rank, i, may have a length, Lni, and a concentration, Nni, of a dopant of the second conductivity type satisfying the relationships:
The lengths Lp and Ln of the pockets are taken from the junctions.
Implantation of a dopant in a semiconductor substrate is a known process and it is possible, in the present process, to use any implantation process conventionally used in the technology of semiconductors.
As is known, the formation of doped pockets in a semiconductor substrate depends on the angle of incidence of the implantation with respect to the normal to the substrate, on the implantation dose, and on the implantation energy of the dopant. Thus, by varying the angle of incidence and the dopant dose, it is possible to increase the length of the implanted pocket and to vary the dopant concentration.
As a variant, in order to vary the length of the second implanted pockets and their dopant concentration, successive implantation steps may be carried out with the same angle of incidence with respect to the normal, the same dose, and the same implantation energy. However, subjecting the device to a different annealing heat treatment step after each successive implantation step may make the dopant implanted in the substrate diffuse differently for each implanted pocket.
The remainder of the description refers to the appended figures, which show respectively:
The channel region 6 may be covered with a gate oxide layer 11 (for example, a thin silicon oxide layer), which is itself surmounted by a gate 12 (for example, a gate made of silicon). The gate 12 may be flanked on two opposed sides by spacers 13, 14 made of a suitable dielectric.
To reduce the rate of roll-off of the threshold voltage, Vth, in the channel region 6, two first pockets 7, 8 are formed in the channel region. Each pocket may be adjacent to one of the junctions 4, 5, respectively. These pockets are doped by means of a dopant of the first conductivity type, p, but with a concentration, Np, of dopant which locally increases the concentration in the substrate to above Ns and has a length, Lp, as short as possible.
Two second pockets 9, 10 are formed in the channel region 6. The second pockets are each stacked against one of the first pockets, but with a length, Ln, greater than the length, Lp, of the first pockets. The second pockets are doped with a dopant of the second conductivity type. For example, the dopant may be an n-type dopant with a concentration, Nn, such that Nn is less than the concentration Np of dopant of the first conductivity type in the substrate.
Thus, in the zones of the second pockets, the net concentration of dopant of the first conductivity type (for example, the p-type dopant) is decreased but the nature of the conductivity in the channel region is not changed. The channel may still remain a region of p-type conductivity.
Each elementary pocket of a given rank, i, has a length, Lni, and a concentration, Nni, of dopant of the second conductivity type which satisfy the following relationships:
In other words, the elementary pockets stacked against the first pockets 7 and 8 are also stacked against one another. However, they have increasing lengths and, concurrently, concentrations of dopant of the first conductivity type which decrease as their lengths increase.
Moreover, the sum of the concentrations, ΣNni, of the stacked elementary pockets is such that it remains less than the concentration, Ns, of dopant of the first conductivity type in the substrate so that the conductivity type of the channel region 6 is not modified.
Thus, in the case shown in
Curve A corresponds to the stacking of a single second pocket and shows that a flat Vth is obtained for a channel length down to 0.15 μm.
Curve B corresponds to the stacking of two second pockets and shows that a flat Vth is obtained for a channel length down to 0.07 μm.
Finally, curve C corresponds to the stacking of seven second pockets and shows that a flat Vth can be obtained for a channel length down to 0.025 μm.
Thus, the above curves show that the necessary doping levels remain reasonable and make it possible to obtain flat curves of Vth as a function of the effective channel length down to effective lengths of 25 nm. This may be so even with gate oxide thicknesses of 4 nm.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
99 07391 | Jun 1999 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR00/01537 | 6/5/2000 | WO | 00 | 5/3/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO00/77856 | 12/21/2000 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4154626 | Joy et al. | May 1979 | A |
4276095 | Beilstein, Jr. et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4636822 | Codella et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4683485 | Schrantz | Jul 1987 | A |
4801555 | Holly et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4851360 | Haken et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4966859 | Risch et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4968639 | Bergonzoni | Nov 1990 | A |
4987088 | Bergonzoni et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5006477 | Farb | Apr 1991 | A |
5021851 | Haken et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5045898 | Chen et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5132753 | Chang et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5143857 | Finchem et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5270235 | Ito | Dec 1993 | A |
5371394 | Ma et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5409848 | Han et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5422510 | Scharf et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5449937 | Arimura et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5548148 | Bindal | Aug 1996 | A |
5675166 | Ilderem et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5716861 | Moslehi | Feb 1998 | A |
5731611 | Hshieh et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5759901 | Loh et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767557 | Kizilyalli | Jun 1998 | A |
5770880 | Woodbury et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5827763 | Gardner et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5858827 | Ono | Jan 1999 | A |
5874329 | Neary et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5949105 | Moslehi | Sep 1999 | A |
6017798 | Ilderem et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020244 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6091111 | Demirlioglu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6150200 | Merchant | Nov 2000 | A |
6172406 | Nguyen | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6284579 | Wang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6352912 | Brown et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6387763 | Pio et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6410393 | Hao et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6465332 | Papadas et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6486510 | Brown et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6507058 | Hall et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6559019 | Nguyen | May 2003 | B1 |
6593623 | Sultan | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6667513 | Skotnicki et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6700160 | Merchant | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6737715 | Pio et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6960499 | Nandakumar et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7112501 | Okihara | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20020039819 | Guiseppe | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20040061187 | Weber | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040132260 | Lenoble | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050151174 | Kim | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 763 855 | Mar 1997 | EP |
06 318698 | Nov 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10018179 | May 2002 | US |
Child | 11318397 | US |