This application is the U.S. national phase of International Application No. PCT/GB2007/000360 filed 1 Feb. 2007 which designated the U.S. and claims priority to European Patent Application No. 06251012.8 filed 24 Feb. 2006, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to the sensing of a disturbance, in particular to the sensing of a disturbance along an optical link.
Several techniques are known for sensing a disturbance along an optical link. In one type of interferometric technique, the disturbance is an environmental disturbance, such as an acoustic wave or other time-varying disturbance which causes a phase change to light signals propagating along the link. However, many of these techniques rely on backscattering or reflection along the optical link. The need for backscattering or reflection can make these techniques unsuitable for use with long haul optical links because long haul links normally have one or more repeater amplifiers, each with an optical isolator which acts as a barrier to backscattered or reflected light.
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of sensing an environmental effect on an optical link, including the steps of: using a first interferometer arrangement connected to an optical source so as to generate pairs of signal copies, which signal copies of a given pair are temporally delayed relative to one another; transmitting the time-displaced signal copies from the first interferometer arrangement onto the optical link; receiving the time-displaced signal copies transmitted over the optical link; and, using a second interferometer arrangement to temporally recombine the received signal copies from a given pair so as to generate an interferometer signal, which interferometer signal is representative of environmental effects on the optical link.
Because a second interferometer arrangement is used to temporally recombine the signal copies transmitted over the link, the need to rely on backscattering is reduced.
The optical source will preferably be of the type that has a coherence time associated therewith, the source producing a waveform with irregular phase variations that occur on a time-scale given by the coherence time of the source. The coherence time of the source may be 10 pico seconds or less. Preferably, so that the signal copies of a pair are sufficiently displaced, the temporal displacement of the signals copies of a given pair will be greater than the coherence time of the source. Yet more preferably, the temporal displacement will be greater than the coherence time of the source by at least a factor of ten.
In a preferred embodiment, each interferometer is arranged to channel radiation such that it is shared between a first path and a second path and to recombine the radiation from the first and second paths, the first and second paths of each interferometer having a respective differential delay associated therewith, the temporal displacement of the signal copies of a given pair being provided by the differential delay of the first interferometer.
Preferably, the combined radiation from the first interferometer will be channeled to a waveguide of the optical link, such that the signal copies of a given pair are transmitted over a common waveguide of the optical link.
To reduce dispersion, the optical signals will preferably be carried by the waveguide in a single mode fashion at the wavelength of the signal copies. The optical link may carry communications traffic at the same or a different wavelength to the signal copies, also in single mode fashion. The communications traffic will preferably be carried over the link contemporaneously with the signal copies, for example using time-division multiplexing or wavelength division multiplexing or as a super-posed signal. Normally, the signal copies and the communications traffic will be carried using optical signals in the infra red region of the optical spectrum.
To improve sensitivity, the source will preferably operate in a continuous wave mode, providing a waveform that is substantially continuous. The waveform may have some interruptions, provided these are on average short (e.g., less than 10%) in comparison to the periods between interruptions. However, a pulsed wave source may be used instead.
According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided apparatus for sensing an environmental effect on an optical link, the apparatus including: an optical source; a first interferometer arrangement connected to the optical source so as to generate pairs of signal copies, which signal copies of a given pair are temporally delayed relative to one another, the first interferometer arrangement having an output coupler for transmitting the time-displaced signal copies onto the optical link; and, a second interferometer arrangement, the second interferometer arrangement having an input coupler for receiving the time-displaced signal copies transmitted over the optical link, the second interferometer arrangement being configured to temporally recombine the received signal copies from a given pair so as to generate an interferometer signal, which interferometer signal is representative of environmental effects, if any, on the optical link.
The present invention will now be described in further details below, by way of example, with reference to the following drawing in which:
One of the paths (here the second path) of each of the upstream and downstream interferometers 14, 26 includes a respective delay stage 36, 38, which introduces a differential delay D as between the two paths of a given interferometer.
The optical source 15 will preferably have a short coherence time, producing a waveform having phase irregularities which normally occur randomly on a time-scale given by the coherence time of the source. Typically, the coherence time is inversely related to the spectral width of the source, with the result that the short coherence time of the source will result in a broad spectral width. The optical source 15 will preferably be operated in a continuous mode fashion, optical signals from the source being joined seamlessly as a continuous waveform (the distinction between consecutive signals being notional). Examples of a suitable optical sources include: a super-luminescent diode, such a source having a phase coherence time of about 0.5 pico seconds; a light emitting diode; a Fabry-Perot laser; and, a source of amplified spontaneous emission such as an Erbium-Doped Fibre Amplifier or a Semiconductor Optical Amplifier.
Considering the operation of the sensing system, the input coupler 20 of the upstream interferometer acts as a power splitter, serving to copy the optical signals from the source 15, such that for each signal produced by the source in a time interval, there is a first signal copy and a second signal copy (the first and second copies of a pair need not be exact duplicates of one another, provided that there are phase irregularities in the waveform from the source that are common to each copy of a given pair). One copy is directed along the first path, whilst the other copy is directed along the second path. The output coupler 22 combines the radiation from the first and second paths and channels the combined radiation onto an output waveguide portion 23 for transmission onto the optical link 12. However, because of the delay stage 36 in one of the arms, the first and second single copies of a given pair will be temporally displaced relative to one another as they are output from the output coupler 22; that is, the signal copies of a pair will be output with a time-lag relative to one another.
At the end of the coupler 28 of the downstream interferometer 26, the arriving signals are once again copied, each copy being channeled along a respective path 32, 34, before being re-combined at the output coupler 30 so as to provide an optical interference signal. Thus, for each signal generated by the source 15, there are four duplicates of this signal: a non-retarded signal S0 which has traveled along the first path 16,32 of both the upstream and the downstream interferometer; a first retarded signal S1 delayed by a delay D at the upstream interferometer 14 (but not at the downstream interferometer); a second retarded signal S2 retarded by the delay D in the downstream interferometer 26 (but not the upstream interferometer 14); and, a twice-retarded signal S3 retarded by a delay 2D, signal 33 being retarded in each of the upstream and downstream interferometers 14, 26.
The first and second retarded signals S1, S2 which are retarded in one interferometer only will arrive at the output coupler 30 of the downstream interferometer 26 at the same time. In the absence of a disturbance in the optical link 12, these signals are copies of one another and the signals will interfere with one another constructively at the output coupler 30. However, a time-varying disturbance is likely to change the phase of one of the pair of signals S1, S2 relative to the other. The signals S1, S2 will then no longer interfere constructively, and the interference signal will be altered. This is because the interference signal will be the result of interference between, on the one hand, a signal whose phase has been disturbed by the disturbance at one time, and, on the other hand, a signal whose phase has been disturbed by the disturbance at a different time, the two times being separated by the differential delay D. Since the disturbance will be changing with time, it will affect the two signals in a different way.
The interference signal (once converted into the electrical domain by the receiver 40) can be analysed by the signal processing unit 42, the signal processing unit 42 being configured to provide an alert signal if the occurrence of a disturbance is inferred from the interference signal. The signal processing unit 42, having a memory and a suitably programmed processor, may be configured to simply infer the presence of a disturbance if the interference signal reaches a threshold level (above the background noise level). However, more sophisticated techniques may be employed to analyse the interference signal in order to determine the nature of the disturbance.
The optical link 12 will preferably be arranged to carry communications traffic from a data source 52, for example a data source which provides wavelength division multiplexed channels; that is, different channels having a line-width centered at different respective frequencies. In such a situation, the upstream junction 24 will be a combiner, configured to superpose or otherwise combine the optical signals from the source 15 used for sensing (the sensing signals) and the data signals from the source. Here, the sensing signals are a low power spectral density broadband optical signal, which the combiner adds to the data signals such that there is very little breakthrough in any given transmission channel. Any breakthrough that does occur will appear as a small increase in background spontaneous noise. The combiner could be based on a fibre coupler with for example a 95%:5% coupling ratio. Alternatively, the combiner could be a WDM coupler matched to the transmission multiplex in which case breakthrough will be further reduced. The exact spectral shape of the sensor signal is not important and can contain ‘holes’ where the transmission channels are located, for example, by filtering out slices of spectrum at the transmission channel frequencies. The downstream coupler 37 will correspond to the upstream coupler (for example, the downstream coupler 37 could also be a fibre coupler with a 95%:5% coupling ratio) so as to extract at least a portion of the intensity of the sensing signals transmitted along the link 12.
The power budget of the WDM system will need to be increased by a fractional channel capacity “x” where x is ratio of total sensor power over the section of the link which is to be sensed (for example a sub-sea section) to that in a single transmission channel: x should be <10%. Then, the breakthrough in each channel will be less than x/n, where n is the number of channels. The sensor system can use these lower power levels due the much lower signal bandwidth it requires (as compared to that needed for data traffic transmission)
Because the interferometer paths as well as the waveguide portions between the interferometers and the respective upstream and downstream junctions may be sense environmental effects, these may be housed in an acoustically protective housing, or other shielding means or suppression means may be provided to protect or isolate (at least partially) the interferometers from acoustic vibrations which are not to be sensed, thereby making it easier to distinguish disturbances on the (preferably amplified) portion of the link 12 between the interferometers 14,26 (i.e., the sensing region) that is to be sensed or monitored.
Clearly, the choice of differential delay D in each of the interferometers 14, 26 is important in order to obtain a good system sensitivity. A first requirement is that the delay D is larger than the coherence time of the source, preferably by a factor of 3 or even 10, so that signal copies from a given pair are sufficiently displaced. A second consideration when choosing the delay time relates to the frequency components of a disturbance which are to be detected: the sensitivity of the sensing system to frequencies much lower than the inverse of the delay time will be attenuated. Although the above considerations suggest a long delay time, these have to be balanced against the attenuation that a long delay line in the interferometers will bring about. Typically, a delay line (formed by glass-based optical fibre) of about 10 kilometres to 20 kilometres in length is thought to provide a good response at acoustic frequencies.
The length of the respective delay time (that is, the extent of the imbalance) at the interferometers 14,26 should ideally be identical. In practise, however, a match to within the coherence time of the source 15 will be acceptable. That is, if the coherence time of the source is given by C then the differential delay D1, D2 of each interferometer should be such that D2−C<D1<D2+C. However, the situation for example where D2−2C<D1<D2+2C is thought to still provide a reasonable response to disturbances.
The optical link 12 may extend over a distance of several hundred or even thousands of kilometres, in which case the optical link will include one or more repeaters or other optical amplifiers 58 at intervals along the path of the link 12, the amplifiers being connected by optical fibre waveguide portions 61. Such amplifiers are useful in order to compensate for losses along the waveguide portions 61, due for example to Rayleigh backscattering. An example of an amplifier 58 is shown schematically in
The output coupler 30 to which the differential receiver 40 is coupled is a 2×2 coupler (as are each of the other interferometer couplers 20, 22, 28) with a first and a second output port 44, 46. The receiver 40 has first and second photo-diodes 48, 50, for example PIN diodes, which are respectively coupled to the first and second outputs ports 44, 46 of the output coupler 30 of the interferometer 26. The differential receiver 40 is configured to provide an output signal that depends on the difference between the intensity at the first and second photo-diodes. Because the output at the output ports 44, 46 are complementary to one another (that is, when one output is high, the other output is low), the differential receiver will produce an output signal that is less susceptible to background intensity fluctuations in the signal from the optical link. The differential receiver will be particularly useful if a supervisory amplitude-modulated signal is superposed on the communications traffic carried by the link 12 for monitoring the operation of the amplifiers along the link, as is often the case in long haul links. Because the supervisory signal is an amplitude signal, it will be present at both output ports 44,46 of the output coupler 30, and will therefore be at least partially suppressed by the differential receiver.
The input couplers 22, 48 of the interferometer at the transmitter and receiver stations may have a coupling ratio of 50:50 to each interferometer path, but the coupling ratio will preferably be weighed so as to take into account the increased loss in the interferometer path which includes the delay stage.
In order to improve the signal to noise ratio of the sensing system, the downstream interferometer 26 is provided with a phase modulator 53 for modulating the phase of light travelling on one of the interferometer paths, here the first path. The modulator is driven by an oscillator 54, which causes the modulator to apply an oscillating phase modulation at a frequency of a 10 kHz for example, which serves to shift the interferometer signal onto a 10 kHz carrier wave so as to avoid the low frequency noise (for example 1/f noise) that might occur in the differential receiver 42. In addition, since the imposed phase modulation oscillates between 0 and 180 degrees, the average imposed phase shift will be between these two values, thereby applying a phase bias at the output coupler 30 of the downstream interferometer 26, which phase bias will improve the sensitivity of the downstream interferometer to phase changes in the link 12 brought about by a disturbance or other environmental effect.
With reference to
A first link 12a extends between the transmitter and receiver stations 13a,17a of the first sensing system 10a, whilst a second link 12b extends between the transmitter and receiver stations 13b,17b of the second sensing system 10b. The first and second links 12a,12b each include a plurality of amplifiers and waveguide portions between the amplifiers in a similar fashion to that of
Because the first and second links are secured together for example in the same cable, a disturbance to the cable 19 is likely to disturb both of the links 12a,12b. Therefore, the disturbance will be detected at the receiving stations 17a,17b of both the first and second sensing systems 10a,10b. The times at which the disturbance is detected at the two ends of the cable 19 will depend on the position of the disturbance due to the finite transit time of optical signals along the links 12a,12b, a disturbance near one end of the cable being detected at that end before it is detected at the other end. Thus, by monitoring the cable at two positions and noting the local time at which a disturbance is detected at each position, it is possible to infer the location of the disturbance occurring between the two monitoring position along the cable path.
Accordingly, a first and second clock 80a,80b is provided at the respective receiver station 17a,17b of the first and second sensing system 10a,10b. The clocks 80a,80b, each of which is for example a crystal quartz clock, are synchronised to one another in a known fashion, for example using a radio link. Considering the receiver station 17a of the first sensing system 10a, the clock 80a is coupled to the signal processing unit 42a thereof the signal processing stage being configured to note the clock reading at which a disturbance is detected (other components of the receiver station common to those shown in
Because the first and second links are secured together for example in the same cable, a disturbance to the cable 19 is likely to disturb both of the links 12a,12b. Therefore, the disturbance will be detected at the receiving stations 17a,17b of both the first and second sensing systems 10a,10b.
The embodiments above provided a simple way in which existing undersea or other cables can be used to provide a sensor that is distributed, in that the sensor is sensitive in a continuous fashion over a sensing region, which sensing region can be 1 km or more even several hundred km in extent.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06251012 | Feb 2006 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2007/000360 | 2/1/2007 | WO | 00 | 8/20/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/096580 | 8/30/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4297887 | Bucaro | Nov 1981 | A |
4370610 | Allen | Jan 1983 | A |
4397551 | Bage et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4443700 | Macedo et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4463451 | Warmack et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4538103 | Cappon | Aug 1985 | A |
4572949 | Bowers et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4593385 | Chamuel | Jun 1986 | A |
4649529 | Avicola | Mar 1987 | A |
4654520 | Griffiths | Mar 1987 | A |
4668191 | Plischka | May 1987 | A |
4688200 | Poorman et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4697926 | Youngquist et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4708471 | Beckmann et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4708480 | Sasayama et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4770535 | Kim et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4781056 | Noel et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4805160 | Ishii et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4847596 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4885462 | Dakin | Dec 1989 | A |
4885915 | Jakobsson | Dec 1989 | A |
4897543 | Kersey | Jan 1990 | A |
4907856 | Hickernell | Mar 1990 | A |
4976507 | Udd | Dec 1990 | A |
4991923 | Kino et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994668 | Lagakos et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994886 | Nadd | Feb 1991 | A |
5004912 | Martens et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5015842 | Fradenburgh et al. | May 1991 | A |
5025423 | Earp | Jun 1991 | A |
5046848 | Udd | Sep 1991 | A |
5051965 | Poorman | Sep 1991 | A |
5093568 | Maycock | Mar 1992 | A |
5104391 | Ingle et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5140559 | Fisher | Aug 1992 | A |
5173743 | Kim | Dec 1992 | A |
5187362 | Keeble | Feb 1993 | A |
5191614 | LeCong | Mar 1993 | A |
5194847 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5206924 | Kersey | Apr 1993 | A |
5223967 | Udd | Jun 1993 | A |
5307410 | Bennett | Apr 1994 | A |
5311592 | Udd | May 1994 | A |
5313266 | Keolian et al. | May 1994 | A |
5319609 | Regnault | Jun 1994 | A |
5351318 | Howell et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5355208 | Crawford et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5359412 | Schulz | Oct 1994 | A |
5361130 | Kersey et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5363463 | Kleinerman | Nov 1994 | A |
5373487 | Crawford et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5379357 | Sentsui et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5384635 | Cohen | Jan 1995 | A |
5412464 | Thomas et al. | May 1995 | A |
5457998 | Fujisaki et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5473459 | Davis | Dec 1995 | A |
5491573 | Shipley | Feb 1996 | A |
5497233 | Meyer | Mar 1996 | A |
5500733 | Boisrobert et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502782 | Smith | Mar 1996 | A |
5604318 | Fasshauer | Feb 1997 | A |
5636021 | Udd | Jun 1997 | A |
5637865 | Bullat et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5663927 | Olson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5691957 | Spiesberger | Nov 1997 | A |
5694114 | Udd | Dec 1997 | A |
5754293 | Farhadiroushan | May 1998 | A |
5767950 | Hawver et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778114 | Eslambolchi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5936719 | Johnson | Aug 1999 | A |
5975697 | Podoleanu | Nov 1999 | A |
5982791 | Sorin | Nov 1999 | A |
5991479 | Kleinerman | Nov 1999 | A |
6072921 | Frederick et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075628 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6115520 | Laskowski et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6148123 | Eslambolchi | Nov 2000 | A |
6194706 | Ressl | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195162 | Varnham et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6269198 | Hodgson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269204 | Ishikawa | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285806 | Kersey et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6315463 | Kropp | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6381011 | Nickelsberg | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6459486 | Udd et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487346 | Nothofer | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6489606 | Kersey et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6594055 | Snawerdt | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6625083 | Vandenbroucke | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628570 | Ruffa | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6704420 | Goedgebuer et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6788417 | Zumberge et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6813403 | Tennyson | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6859419 | Blackmon et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7006230 | Dorrer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7110677 | Reingand | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7397568 | Bryce | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7548319 | Hartog | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7667849 | Sikora et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
20010028766 | Hatami-Hanza | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020196447 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030103211 | Lange et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117893 | Bary | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030174924 | Tennyson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040027560 | Fredin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040113056 | Everall et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040201476 | Howard | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040227949 | Dorrer et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060163457 | Katsifolis et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060256334 | Sikora et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256344 | Sikora et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070009600 | Edgren et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070065150 | Sikora et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070127933 | Hoshida et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070264012 | Healey et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080013161 | Tokura et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080018908 | Healey et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080123085 | Sikora et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080166120 | Heatley et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080219093 | Heatley et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219660 | Healey et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232242 | Healey et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080278711 | Sikora et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090014634 | Sikora et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090097844 | Healey | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103928 | Healey et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090135428 | Healey | May 2009 | A1 |
20090274456 | Healey et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 251 632 | Jan 1988 | EP |
0 360 449 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0364093 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0 376 449 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0 377 549 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0513381 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0 592 690 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0 794 414 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0 821 224 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 953 830 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1 037 410 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1 096 273 | May 2001 | EP |
1236985 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1 385 022 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1 496 723 | Jan 2005 | EP |
2 751 746 | Jan 1998 | FR |
2 015 844 | Sep 1979 | GB |
2 019 561 | Oct 1979 | GB |
2 113 417 | Aug 1983 | GB |
2 126 820 | Mar 1984 | GB |
2 205 174 | Nov 1988 | GB |
2 219 166 | Nov 1989 | GB |
2 262 803 | Jun 1993 | GB |
2 264 018 | Aug 1993 | GB |
2 401 738 | Nov 2004 | GB |
2001-194109 | Jul 2001 | JP |
WO 9325866 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO 9705713 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 0167806 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 02065425 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 03014674 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 2005008443 | Jan 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090097844 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |