This application is the US national phase of international application PCT/GB2006/000759 filed 2 Mar. 2006 which designated the U.S. and claims benefit of GB 0504579.4, dated 4 Mar. 2005, the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to an undersea seismic sensing system, in particular to an undersea seismic sensor system including a flotation arrangement.
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an undersea seismic sensing system including: a vibration sensor for sensing seismic vibrations on the sea bed; a transmitter unit coupled to the vibration sensor, the transmitter unit being arranged to transmit, in use, an acoustic wave from which the presence of a seismic vibration can be inferred; and, a flotation arrangement for retaining the acoustic transmitter unit in a raised position relative to the sea bed.
Further aspects of the invention are provided in the claims. The invention will now be further described, with reference to the following drawings in which:
In
The transmitter 104 is suspended at an upper portion thereof 103 from a float 106 by a cable or other link 109 so as to retain the transmitter above the sea bed, the transmitter preferably being configured to transmit in an angled downward direction towards the cable (alternatively, the float may be integrally formed with the transmitter). This makes transmission to the cable easier than it would be were the transmitter on the sea bed.
The sensor 102 has a vibration detector in contact with the sea bed so as to detect seismic vibration. In response to detecting a seismic vibration, the sensor produces an electrical sensor signal from which the presence of a seismic event can be detected. This signal is coupled to the transmitter unit by an electrical conductor. The transmitter includes an electronic circuit for generating an acoustic signal in response to the received electrical sensor signal, which acoustic signal is transmitted as an acoustic wave by a transducer element of the transmitter unit. The acoustic wave is carried through the sea water and towards the optical cable. Light travelling along a waveguide of the optical cable undergoes a phase modulation by the acoustic wave from the transducer.
The transmitter 104 is tethered at a lower portion thereof to the sensor housing by a steel cable 105, which extend between the transmitter and the sensor housing. The sensor is weighted so as to keep the sensor resting against the sea bed. The weighting of the sensor and the buoyancy of the float 106 are chosen in dependence on one another, such that the sensor is sufficiently heavy to remain at the sea bed under the upward force provided by the float 106. In an alternative embodiment, a separate weight or other anchoring device is provided to retain the lower end of the cable 105 at a point on the sea bed. In either case, cable will be sufficiently short (for example, a few meters or a few tens of meters) such that the float remains below sea level. As a result of the upward force provided by the float on the one hand, and the downward restoring force of the tether (provided by the weighted sensor or other base) on the other hand, the transmitter will experience a stabilising force that will help the transmitter remain in the correct orientation. Preferably, the transmitter will include a main body member the transmitter element being secured to or within the main body member, the main body member being secured to the tether and float.
In more detail, the monitoring station 12 includes an optical source 18 with a short coherence time (random phase changes in the output providing an irregular component to the signal). Sensing signals (waveform portions) from the optical source 18 are fed to an interferometer stage 20, here a Mach Zehnder interferometer having a first path 24 and a second path 26. The interferometer 20 includes a first coupling stage 28 for coupling optical radiation between the optical source 18, the first and second paths 24, 26, and a signal processing system 29. For light travelling in a forward direction, that is, away from the source, the first coupling stage 28 acts as a directional power (intensity) splitter, channelling light from the optical source 18 to each of the paths 24, 26, the power to each path being shared in a predetermined manner, here in a 50:50 ratio.
For each signal provided by the optical source 18 in a given time interval, that signal is copied such that there is a first copy and a second copy, the first and second copies being duplicates of one another. One copy travels along the first path 24 whilst the other copy travels along the second path 26. A second coupling stage 130 is provided for coupling light between the first and second paths 24, 26 and an output 135 of the interferometer, which output is connected to the optical link 16. For light travelling in the forward direction, the coupling stage 130 acts as a combiner, combining the light from the first and second paths and channelling this combined light to the interferometer output 135. The first path of the interferometer has a delay stage 134 for increasing the transit time of light travelling therealong between the first and second coupling stages 28, 130, such that the transit time for light travelling between the coupling stages 28, 130 is longer along the first path 24 than it is along the second path 26. For each signal produced by the optical source, the interferometer 20 serves to delay one of the signal copies relative to the other signal copy, the signal copies being transmitted onto the link 16 at different times to one another.
The additional (differential) delay imposed by the delay stage 134 is much greater than the coherence time of the optical source 18. Thus, when light travelling along the first and second paths is recombined by the second coupling stage 130, the interference between light travelling along the two paths averages out, such that on average (over a timescale much greater than the coherence time) the amplitude of light upon recombination at the second coupling stage 130 is of constant amplitude 18.
An outstation 14 is provided at a far end of the fibre. Reflector means, such as a reflecting surface 132 are provided at the outstation 14 for returning signals to the base station 12. For signals travelling in the return direction, that is, for return signals arriving at the interferometer 20 from the outstation 14, the second coupling stage 130 acts as a power splitter, in a similar fashion to the action of the first coupling stage 28 on light in the forward direction from the optical source 18. In this way, return signals are copied at the second coupling stage 130, one copy being channeled along the first path 24, whilst the other copy is channeled along the second path 26. The first coupling stage 28 then serves to combine light from the first and second paths in the return direction, channelling the interference signal (resulting from the combined light) to a signal processing system 29.
For each signal generated by the source 18, there are thus four duplicates of this signal: a non-retarded signal S0 which has traveled along the second path 26 of the interferometer 20 in both the forward and reverse directions; a first retarded signal S1 delayed by a delay D in the forward direction (but not the reverse direction); a second retarded signal S2 retarded by the delay D in the reverse direction (but not the forward direction); and, a twice-retarded signal S3 retarded by a delay 2D, signal S3 being retarded in each of the forward and reverse directions.
The first and second retarded signals S1, S2 which are retarded in one direction only will return to the first coupler stage 28 at the same time. In the absence of any disturbance in the fibre 16, these signals are copies of one another and the signals will interfere or otherwise combine constructively at the first coupler stage 28. However, if one of the pair of signals S1, S2 is modulated or otherwise modified by a disturbance along the fibre, the interference between the two signals will result in an interference signal having different spectral characteristics to the interference signal which would otherwise be produced in the absence of any disturbance to the fibre 16.
In the embodiments shown above, the transducer of the modulator arrangement generates a wave-like disturbance, which is coupled to an optical fibre. The result of this is that an elastic wave (preferably a bulk elastic wave) is launched into the transmission medium of the fibre. The elastic waves cause a local distortion of the glass structure, which changes the refractive index experienced by light travelling along the fibre. This change in refractive index caused a phase modulation in one or both of the (carrier) signals of a pair travelling along the link. However, the interference signal will be the result of interference between, on the one hand, a signal having been modulated by the disturbance at one time, and on the other hand, a signal modulated by the disturbance at another time, the two times being separated by the differential delay D. Thus, when an acoustic disturbance is applied to the optical link 16, the interference signal from the first coupling stage 28 will be a signal at the frequency of the applied acoustic disturbance. Likewise, any amplitude modulated applied to the acoustic signal will result in an interference signal with a corresponding amplitude modulation.
The frequency of the elastic wave may be a few kHz, but higher frequencies of a few MHz or more would allow for higher data rates.
The signal processing system includes: a photo-receiver 51 coupled to the first coupling stage 28 for converting optical signals into electrical signals; a filter 52 for receiving electrical signals from the photo-receiver 51 and filtering the electrical signals; and, a signal processing unit 54. If the information signal introduced by the modulator is an analogue signal, the processing unit 54 may simply be an amplifier, since the amplitude of the interference signal will vary in accordance with the amplitude of the applied acoustic signal. However, if the acoustic signal is amplitude modulated in a digital manner, the processing unit will be a digital system.
The light source may be a Light Emitting Diode, a Fabry-Perot Laser Diode, or a source of amplified spontaneous emission such as an Erbium-Doped Fibre Amplifier or a Semiconductor Optical Amplifier, but preferably the light source will be a Super Luminescent Diode, since this has a broad and smooth power spectrum, and a short coherence time of about 0.5 pico seconds. The radiation produced by the optical source will preferably be unpolarised, or alternatively a de-polarising unit 43 may be provided between the light source and the interferometer, for depolarising the light before the light is injected into the interferometer (the de-polarising unit may be for example, a Fibre Lyot de-polariser). A depolariser 49 will preferably be provided in one of the paths of the interferometer, here, the first path, so that the polarisation of light from the first path combining in the return direction at the first coupler 28 is at least partially aligned with that of the light from the other path. Typically, the source will operate at a wavelength of between 1 micron and 2 microns, preferably around 1.31, 1.48 or 1.55 microns, in order to efficiently make use of standard telecommunications optical fibre, such fibre being configured to support single mode transmission at this wavelength. Typically, the fibre will have a single core of a diameter which is around 9 or 10 microns.
The first coupling stage 28, at the source side of the interferometer, will preferably be a 3×3 coupler (with some ports terminated), whereas the second coupling stage 130, at the transmission side, will preferably be a 2×2 coupler, with one port terminated. The 3×3 coupler is used in order to create a relative phase bias of 120° between the optical fields on its output ports. This can be used to improve the sensitivity of the interferometer.
It has been appreciated that the delay time D is related to the frequency response of the optical cable to phase modulation: that is, the lower the detectable acoustic frequency, the longer the delay time must be. As a very general rule, it is helpful if the delay time is longer than the inverse of the lowest detectable frequency. Preferably, the delay will thus be at least 100 micro seconds, although at least 30 micro seconds may be sufficient for some applications. The delay time will be particularly important if the sensing system is operating microphonically, such that the sensing signal is a microphonic representation of the seismic disturbance. However, if the sensor 102 is operating so as to provide a simple alert at a sufficiently high frequency, then lower values of delay may be used.
Sensor networks are in abundance throughout the world's oceans to monitor seismic events, the impact of global warming, sand bank drift, whale and fish stock migrations, and so on. The recent tsunami in the Indian ocean has brought into stark clarity the need to have the right sensors, in the right place, at the right time, particularly where lives are at stake. Sadly the Indian ocean, and other risk zones, currently have no sensing capability, and there is now a growing global effort to address that. Key to the deployment of appropriate sensor networks is cost, and a key factor in that is the undersea infrastructure.
It is important to deploy sea-bed sensors in the optimum locations, many of which coincide with the routes of undersea fibre cables. Sea-bed sensors could be laid alongside the undersea cable and their data could be coupled to the fibres within the undersea cable via a clip-on device attached to the outer sheath.
A preferred approach in this invention is to convey data from the sensors to the undersea cable via an acoustic sonar (wireless) signal.
In the prior art, existing sea-bed sensors such as those used in the DART tsunami warning system around the Pacific Rim at website www.ndbc.noaa.gov/Dart/dart.shtml incorporate an acoustic data transmission system to convey sensor data to the surface buoy for onward transmission to the shore station via orbiting satellite. The distance between the sea-bed sensor and the surface buoy can be around 6 km in the deep ocean at website www.ndbc.noaa.gov/Dart/dart.shtml and the frequency of the acoustic sonar signal is typically 15-18 kHz, which is capable of supporting a data rate of a few 100 bit/s. In one of the embodiments of the invention, such frequencies are detectable with an optical cable link.
Sensor data coupled to the fibers in this way will be received at the shore station and conveyed to the appropriate organizations (ref the DART system at website www.ndbc.noaa.gov/Dart/dart.shtml) via the global telecom network.
Benefits of this invention include . . .
The preference in this invention to use existing sea-bed sensors that wirelessly couple data to the undersea cable is well suited to the necessary maintenance regime of these kind of sensors (ref the DART system at website www.ndbc.noaa.gov/Dart/brief.shtml). Sea-bed sensors need to be recovered at regular intervals (typically every 2 years for the DART system) to replace the battery, re-calibrate the sensor, upgrade the electronics etc. In the DART system this is done by sending a sonar signal from a surface ship down to the sea-bed sensor which releases the anchor (usually a heavy lump of concrete that forms the base of the sensor housing). The sensor then floats to the surface by virtue of flotation tanks where it is recovered, refurbished, then re-deployed with a fresh anchor. This procedure can take place entirely independent from the undersea fiber cable, which is essential.
One or more features of one or more embodiments of the invention can be summarised in terms of one or more of the following clauses: 1. A communication system including a transmitter unit having an acoustic transmitter for transmitting acoustic waves through a fluid medium; an optical link arranged such that the acoustic waves modulate light travelling along the link; and a monitoring station for detecting the modulation. 2. A communication system as specified in clause 1, wherein the acoustic waves contain an information signal, the monitoring station being configured to retrieve the information signal from the detected modulation 3. A communication system as specified in clause 1 or clause 2, wherein the fluid medium is a liquid medium 4. A communication system as specified in any of the preceding clauses, wherein there is provided a including a seismic vibration sensor, the seismic vibration sensor being operatively coupled to the transmitter unit for transmitting information relating to sensed seismic vibrations. 5. A communication system as specified in clause 4, wherein the seismic vibration sensor and the transmitter unit are configured for undersea operation, the fluid medium being sea water 6. A communication system as specified in clause 4 or clause 5, wherein means are provided for retaining the seismic sensor on the sea bed, and retaining the transmitter in a raised position relative to the sensor. 7. A communication system as specified in any of the preceding clauses, wherein a flotation system is provided for retaining the transmitter unit in a spaced apart relationship to the sea bed. 8. A communication system as specified in any of the preceding clauses, wherein a plurality of seismic sensors are provided about the path of the optical link 9. A communications system as specified in any of the preceding clauses, wherein the monitoring station is configured for receiving sensing signals previously transmitted onto the optical link, wherein the sensing signals are formed by pairs of signal copies, which copies of a pair have a time delay relative to one another, and wherein the monitoring station is configured to combine the respective signals of a pair so as to extract modulated data, if any, in the sensing signals. 10. A communications system as specified in clause 9, wherein the monitoring station includes an optical source for transmitting the sensing signals onto the optical link, the sensing signals being returned along the link to the monitoring station. 11. A communications system as specified in clause 10, wherein reflector means are provided to return the sensing signals. 12. A communications system as specified in any of clauses 9 to 11, wherein the time delay is greater than the inverse of the frequency of the modulation. 13. A communications system as specified in any of clauses 9 to 11, wherein the delay is at least 30 micro seconds, preferably at least 100 micro seconds. 14. A communications system as specified in any of clauses 9 to 13, wherein the monitoring station includes interferometer means having a path difference associated therewith for introducing a time delay between signal copies of a pair. 15. A communications system as specified in clause 14, wherein the interferometer means is used to temporally re-align the returned signal copies of a pair. 16. A communications system as specified in any preceding clause, wherein the or each sensor is in a spaced apart relationship to the optical link, residing preferably at least 50 or 100 m from the optical link 16. A communications system as specified in any preceding clause, wherein the optical link is a fibre cable, preferably an undersea fibre cable. 17. An subsea system for detecting seabed disturbances, the system including a seabed sensor for detecting seabed vibrations; a transmitter unit having an acoustic transmitter for transmitting acoustic waves through a fluid medium, the transmitter unit being coupled to the seabed sensor so that the transmitter can transmit acoustic signals indicative of the sensed seabed vibrations; and an optical link arranged such that the acoustic waves modulate light travelling along the fibre; and a monitoring station for detecting the modulation.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0504579.4 | Mar 2005 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2006/000759 | 3/2/2006 | WO | 00 | 8/30/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/092611 | 9/8/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4297887 | Bucaro | Nov 1981 | A |
4397551 | Bage et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4443700 | Macedo et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4463451 | Warmack et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4538103 | Cappon | Aug 1985 | A |
4572949 | Bowers et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4593385 | Chamuel | Jun 1986 | A |
4649529 | Avicola | Mar 1987 | A |
4654520 | Griffiths | Mar 1987 | A |
4668191 | Plischka | May 1987 | A |
4688200 | Poorman et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4697926 | Youngquist et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4708471 | Beckmann et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4708480 | Sasayama et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4770535 | Kim et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4781056 | Noel et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4805160 | Ishii et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4847596 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4907856 | Hickernell | Mar 1990 | A |
4976507 | Udd | Dec 1990 | A |
4991923 | Kino et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994668 | Lagakos et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994886 | Nadd | Feb 1991 | A |
5004912 | Martens et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5015842 | Fradenburgh et al. | May 1991 | A |
5046848 | Udd | Sep 1991 | A |
5051965 | Poorman | Sep 1991 | A |
5093568 | Maycock | Mar 1992 | A |
5104391 | Ingle et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5140559 | Fisher | Aug 1992 | A |
5173743 | Kim | Dec 1992 | A |
5187362 | Keeble | Feb 1993 | A |
5191614 | LeCong | Mar 1993 | A |
5194847 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5206924 | Kersey | Apr 1993 | A |
5223967 | Udd | Jun 1993 | A |
5311592 | Udd | May 1994 | A |
5313266 | Keolian et al. | May 1994 | A |
5319609 | Regnault | Jun 1994 | A |
5351318 | Howell et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5355208 | Crawford et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5361130 | Kersey et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5363463 | Kleinerman | Nov 1994 | A |
5373487 | Crawford et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5379357 | Sentsui et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5412464 | Thomas et al. | May 1995 | A |
5457998 | Fujisaki et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5473459 | Davis | Dec 1995 | A |
5491573 | Shipley | Feb 1996 | A |
5497233 | Meyer | Mar 1996 | A |
5500733 | Boisrobert et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502782 | Smith | Mar 1996 | A |
5604318 | Fasshauer | Feb 1997 | A |
5636021 | Udd | Jun 1997 | A |
5637865 | Bullat et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5663927 | Olson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5691957 | Spiesberger | Nov 1997 | A |
5694114 | Udd | Dec 1997 | A |
5754293 | Farhadiroushan | May 1998 | A |
5767950 | Hawver et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778114 | Eslambolchi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5936719 | Johnson | Aug 1999 | A |
5975697 | Podoleanu et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991479 | Kleinerman | Nov 1999 | A |
6072921 | Frederick et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075628 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6115520 | Laskowski et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6194706 | Ressl | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195162 | Varnham et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6269198 | Hodgson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269204 | Ishikawa | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285806 | Kersey et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6315463 | Kropp | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6459486 | Udd et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6594055 | Snawerdt | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6625083 | Vandenbroucke | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628570 | Ruffa | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6788417 | Zumberge et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6859419 | Blackmon et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
20010028766 | Hatami-Hanza | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020196447 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030103211 | Lange et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117893 | Bary | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030174924 | Tennyson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040027560 | Fredin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040113056 | Everall et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040201476 | Howard | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060256344 | Sikora et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070009600 | Edgren et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070065150 | Sikora et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070264012 | Healey et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080013161 | Tokura et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080018908 | Healey et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080123085 | Sikora et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080166120 | Heatley et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080219660 | Healey et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080278711 | Sikora et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090014634 | Sikora et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090097844 | Healey | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103928 | Healey et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090135428 | Healey | May 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 251 632 | Jan 1988 | EP |
0 360 449 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0364093 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0 376 449 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0 377 549 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0513381 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0 592 690 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0 794 414 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0 821 224 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 953 830 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1 037 410 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1 096 273 | May 2001 | EP |
1236985 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1 385 022 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1 496 723 | Jan 2005 | EP |
2 751 746 | Jan 1998 | FR |
2 015 844 | Sep 1979 | GB |
2 019 561 | Oct 1979 | GB |
2 113 417 | Aug 1983 | GB |
2 126 820 | Mar 1984 | GB |
2 205 174 | Nov 1988 | GB |
2 219 166 | Nov 1989 | GB |
2 262 803 | Jun 1993 | GB |
2 264 018 | Aug 1993 | GB |
2 401 738 | Nov 2004 | GB |
2001-194109 | Jul 2001 | JP |
WO 9325866 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO 9705713 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 0167806 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 02065425 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 03014674 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 2005008443 | Jan 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080219093 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |