Patent Application
20220196618
The invention relates to a sensor comprising a polyolefin matrix and a sensing compound, and to a smart packaging material comprising the sensor.
Sensors for sensing pH or oxygen are known in the art.
The terms active packaging, intelligent packaging, and smart packaging refer to packaging systems used with foods, pharmaceuticals, and several other types of products. They help extend shelf life, monitor freshness, display information on quality, improve safety, and improve convenience. The terms are closely related. Active packaging usually means having active functions beyond the inert passive containment and protection of the products. Intelligent and smart packaging usually involve the ability to sense or measure an attribute of the product, the inner atmosphere of the package, or the shipping environment. This information can be communicated to users or can trigger active packaging functions. According to a report from Freedonia, demand for active and intelligent packaging in the U.S. is forecasted to expand 8.0 percent annually to $3.5 billion in 2017, well above total packaging demand growth.
One of the problems of certain smart packaging solutions is leaching of the active component, which in some cases makes them not suitable for direct food contact applications.
To reduce leaching, the polymer used for smart packaging materials have a relative high surface energy, such as PET, which provides good adhesion to the sensor/active component.
It would be highly desirable if PE or PP could be used as the packaging base material.
Nature Communications 2018, 9:1123 gives an overview of dye sensors based on polymeric materials. It describes the general problem of leaching of dyes out of hydrophobic polyolefin matrix materials and the instability of sensors based on polyolefin matrix materials produced by either introducing the dye-molecule into the feed mixture of the fabrication process (so-called dye-doping) or by applying the dye after fabrication as a dying step. Whereas the former process is complex and needs optimisation for each polymer/dye combination, the latter method leads often to weakly bonded dye molecules which results in leaching of the polymer. To solve this problem, the authors proposed a plasma dye coating technique to chemically activate the polyolefins, and to chemically bond sensing materials to the polyolefin and preparing stable sensors. This method is, however, still complex and not all sensing compounds can be activated to be incorporated into the polyolefins.
Prog. Polym. Sci. 1994, 19, 529-560 describes the synthesis of surface functionalised polyethylenes by mixing PE with functionalised ethylene oligomers. Optionally, dyes can be attached to the oligomers that can function as sensors. This process is complex as it requires chemically bonding of the active sensor component to an ethylene oligomer and subsequent mixing it with a PE matrix. Furthermore, low molecular weight oligomers typically demix from the high molecular weight matrix, which results in leaching of the active component.
There is a need for versatile sensors that can be readily prepared and have flexibility in application of the type of sensing compound in a polyolefin matrix without leaching of the active sensor component.
The invention relates to a sensor comprising a randomly functionalised polyolefin having functional groups, a sensing compound and optionally a polar solvent, wherein the polyolefin has a crystallinity between 0 and 35%, as determined with DSC, and wherein the amount of monomeric moieties comprising functional groups is at least 0.1 mol % and less than 5 mol %, above 5 mol %, it is very difficult to obtain such polyolefin.
Examples of suitable functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxylic acid, amines and thiol groups, as well as their (partially) deprotonated congeners.
Without wanting to be bound to any theory, the inventors believe that the polyolefin having low crystallinity and density can form a continuous hydrophobic matrix having hydrophilic domains, the latter of which host non-bonded polar sensing compounds. Hence, the polar sensing compound is not chemically bonded but physically entrapped in the hydrophobic polyolefin matrix. Sensing of the sensor is believed to operate by diffusion of volatile components (such as carbon dioxide, oxygen, sulphur dioxide, ammonia) through the hydrophobic matrix, and reacting with the sensing compound (such as for example a pH indicator and/or an redox indicator) in the hydrophilic domains to give a signal like for example a change of colour.
The sensor according to the invention comprises a randomly functionalised polyolefin according to Formula I (with x>0, y≥0, z>0) wherein fragment 1 corresponds to the main monomer of the polymer, fragment 2 corresponds to an optional additional α-olefin and fragment 3 corresponds to the comonomer containing functional groups (FG), preferably protic functional groups such as hydroxyl (—OH), carboxylic acid (—COOH), amine and/or thiol functionalities, a sensing compound and optionally a polar solvent. Preferably, the functional groups are protic functional groups, preferably —OH or —COOH groups. The protic groups can also be partially or fully deprotonated to obtain a partially or fully ionomeric system. Additionally, hydrogen bond enhancing agents can be added to strengthen the inter-polymer interactions within the polar domains.
The polyolefin, according to Formula (I) where y>0, can be a functionalised linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) or a functionalised very low density polyethylene (VLDPE)—together defined as PE for the purpose of the present invention, a functionalised ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR), a functionalised polypropylene (PP) of varying tacticity (Formula (I), y=0) or a functionalised propylene with an α-olefin copolymer (Formula (I), y>0), together defined as PP for the purpose of the present invention. The PE, EPR and/or PP are randomly functionalised with functional groups, such as —OH, —COOH, —SH, NHR, NR2, groups, wherein R is a C1-C20 hydrocarbyl group, by incorporating monomers having functional groups during synthesis of the PP and PE.
A hydrocarbyl in the sense of the invention may be a substituent containing hydrogen and carbon atoms; it is a linear, branched or cyclic saturated or unsaturated aliphatic substituent, such as alkyl, alkenyl, alkadienyl and alkynyl; alicyclic substituent, such as cycloalkyl, cycloalkadienyl, cycloalkenyl; aromatic substituent, such as monocyclic or polycyclic aromatic substituent, as well as combinations thereof, such as alkyl-substituted aryls and aryl-substituted alkyls. It may be substituted with one or more non-hydrocarbyl, heteroatom-containing substituents. Preferably, R is a C1-C20 alkyl or a C6-C20 aryl group, more preferably a C1-C10 alkyl group.
Preferably, the monomers having functional groups have between 6 and 20 C atoms. Preferably, the monomers having functional groups have at one end (the α-position) an olefinic unsaturation and on the other end (the ω-position) the functional group. The functional group can be protected prior to the copolymerisation, but will preferably be deprotected before making the sensor.
It is possible to copolymerise an α-olefin other than ethylene (in case the polymer is a PE-based polymer) or propylene (in case the polymer is a PP-based polymer) for making a polymer having a reduced density, or a reduced amount of crystallinity in the range of 0-35%. Thus terpolymers, containing either ethylene or propylene as the main monomer and a functional comonomer contain an additional α-olefin comonomer. Examples of α-olefin comonomers are selected from the group consisting of ethylene, propylene, 1-butene, 4-methyl-1-pentene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, 1-heptene, 1-octene, 1-nonene, 1-decene, 1-undecene, 1-dodecene, 1-tridecene, 1-tetradecene, 1-pentadecene, 1-hexadecene, 1-heptadecene, 1-octadecene, 1-cyclopentene, cyclohexene, norbornene, ethylidene-norbornene and vinylidene-norbornene and one or more combinations thereof.
Preferably, it can be advantageous to incorporate ethylene, propylene, 1-butene, 1-hexene, 1-octene to obtain a functionalised PE or PP polymer having at least 3 monomeric moieties (Formula (I), y>0). The at least 3 monomeric moieties comprise ethylene (for PE) or propylene (for PP), the monomeric moiety having the functional group and the α-olefin, preferably selected from ethylene, propylene, 1-butene, 1-hexene, 1-octene.
In case of functionalised PP, the density and/or crystallinity can also be tuned by altering the tacticity of the polymer.
Functionalised polyolefins are known in the art.
For example, EP 3034545 discloses a process for the preparation of a graft copolymer comprising a polyolefin main chain and one or multiple polymer side chains, the process comprising the steps of:
A) copolymerising at least one first type of olefin monomer and at least one second type of metal-pacified functionalised olefin monomer using a catalyst system to obtain a polyolefin main chain having one or multiple metal-pacified functionalised short chain branches, the catalyst system comprising:
EP 1186619 discloses inter alia a polar group-containing olefin copolymer comprising a constituent unit represented by the following formula (1), a constituent unit represented by the following formula (2) and a constituent unit represented by the following formula (3), having a molecular weight distribution (Mw/Mn) of not more than 3, and having an intensity ratio of Tαβ to Tαα+Tαβ (Tαβ/Tαα+Tαβ)), as determined from a 13C-NMR spectrum of said copolymer, of not more than 1.0:
wherein R1 and R2 may be the same or different and are each a hydrogen atom or a straight-chain or branched aliphatic hydrocarbon group of 1 to 18 carbon atoms; R3 is a hydrocarbon group; R4 is a heteroatom or a group containing a heteroatom; r is 0 or 1; X is a polar group selected from an alcoholic hydroxyl group, a phenolic hydroxyl group, a carboxylic acid group, a carboxylic acid ester group, an acid anhydride group, an amino group, an amide group, an epoxy group and a mercapto group; p is an integer of 1 to 3; and when p is 2 or 3, each X may be the same or different, and in this case, if r is 0, X may be bonded to the same or different atom of R3, and if r is 1, X may be bonded to the same or different atom of R4.
WO 97/42236 discloses a process to produce functionalised polyolefins by copolymerising at least one polar monomer and at least one olefin under effective copolymerisation conditions using a catalyst system containing a transition metal complex and a cocatalyst. The at least one olefin can be the predominate monomer forming the functionalised polyolefin chain. The transition metal complex includes a transition metal having a reduced valency, which is selectable from groups 4-6 of the Periodic Table of the Elements, with a multidentate monoanionic ligand and with two monoanionic ligands. A polar monomer has at least one polar group and that group is reacted with or coordinated to a protecting compound prior to the copolymerisation step.
Functionalised Olefin Monomer
The functionalised olefin monomer has the following structure and is a reaction product of a compound represented by the structure according to Formula (I) and a masking agent:
wherein R2, R3, and R4 are each independently selected from the group consisting of H and hydrocarbyl with 1 to 16 carbon atoms,
wherein R5—[X—(R6)n]m is a polar functional group containing one or multiple heteroatom containing functionalities X—(R6)n wherein
X is selected from —O—, —S— or —CO2— and R6 is H, and n is 1, or
X is N and R6 is each independently selected from the group consisting of H and a hydrocarbyl group with 1 to 16 carbon atoms, and n is 2,
wherein R5 is either —C(R7a)(R7b)— or a plurality of —C(R7a)(R7b)— groups, wherein R7a, and R7b are each independently selected from the group consisting of H or hydrocarbyl with 1 to 16 carbon atoms and R5 comprises 1 to 10 carbon atoms,
wherein R3 and R5 may together form a ring structure that is functionalised with one or multiple X—(R6)n,
where X is attached to either the main chain or side chain of R5, where m is an entire number between 1 and 10, preferably 1, 2 or 4.
Preferably, X is selected from —O— or —CO2—, and R6 is H.
In a preferred embodiment, the functionalised olefin monomer according to Formula I is a hydroxyl- or carboxylic acid-bearing α-olefin or hydroxyl- or carboxylic acid-functionalised ring-strained cyclic olefin monomer, preferably a hydroxyl, a dihydroxyl or carboxylic acid α-olefin monomer.
Hydroxyl-bearing functionalised olefin monomers may correspond for example to Formula I wherein R2, R3, and R4 are each H and wherein X is —O— and wherein R5 is either —C(R7a)(R7b)— or a plurality of —C(R7a)(R7b)— groups, wherein R7a, and R7b are each independently selected from the group consisting of H or hydrocarbyl with 1 to 16 carbon atoms. Examples of R5 groups are —(CH2)9— and —(CH2)2—.
Further examples of the hydroxyl-functionalised olefin monomer include, but are not limited to allyl alcohol, 3-buten-1-ol, 3-buten-2-ol, 3-buten-1,2-diol, 5-hexene-1-ol, 5-hexene-1,2-diol, 7-octen-1-ol, 7-octen-1,2-diol, 9-decen-1-ol and 10-undecene-1-ol.
Even further examples of functionalised olefin monomer include hydroxyl-functionalised ring-strained cyclic olefins (also called internal olefins), which may be for example typically hydroxyl-functionalised norbornenes, preferably 5-norbornene-2-methanol. They correspond to Formula I wherein R2 and R4 are H and R3 and R5 together for a ring structure that is functionalised with X—H, wherein X is —O—.
Carboxylic acid-bearing functionalised olefin monomers may for example correspond to Formula I wherein R2, R3, and R4 are each H and wherein X is —CO2— and wherein R5 is either —C(R7a)(R7b)— or a plurality of —C(R7a)(R7b)— groups, wherein R7a, and R7b are each independently selected from the group consisting of H or hydrocarbyl with 1 to 16 carbon atoms. An example of an R5 group is —(CH2)8—. Preferred acid functionalised olefin monomers may be selected from the group of 4-pentenoic acid or 10-undecenoic acid.
Accordingly, it is preferred that the functionalised monomer is selected from the group consisting of allyl alcohol, 3-buten-1-ol, 3-buten-2-ol, 3-buten-1,2-diol, 5-hexene-1-ol, 5-hexene-1,2-diol, 7-octen-1-ol, 7-octen-1,2-diol, 9-decen-1-ol, 10-undecene-1-ol, 5-norbornene-2-methanol, 3-butenoic acid, 4-pentenoic acid or 10-undecenoic acid, preferably 3-buten-1-ol, 5-hexen-1-ol, 10-undecen-1-ol, 4-pentenoic acid and 10-undecenoic acid.
The copolymerisation of ethylene with functionalised olefin monomers may lead to a certain degree of catalyst deactivation. It was found that the use of C3 to C6 olefins (instead of ethylene) as the olefin monomer unexpectedly resulted in a low degree of catalyst deactivation even when small functionalised olefin monomers are selected as the functionalised olefin monomer.
It was surprisingly found that the copolymer, comprising C3 to C6 olefins as the olefin monomer, could be prepared according to the process according to the invention with a low degree of catalyst deactivation using small functionalised olefin monomers, such as allyl alcohol, 3-buten-1-ol, 3-buten-2-ol, 3-buten-1,2-diol, 5-hexen-1-ol.
Masking Agent
The hydrogen atoms directly bound to X in the functionalised olefin monomer has a Brønsted acidic nature poisonous to the highly reactive catalyst. A masking agent is used, which can react with the acidic hydrogen and binds to the monomer comprising the polar group. This reaction will prevent a reaction of the acidic polar group (—X—H) with the catalyst and coordination of the polar group (—X—) to the catalyst.
The molar amount of the masking agent preferably is at least the same molar amount as monomer of Formula (I) used in the process according to the invention. Preferably, the molar amount of masking agent is at least 10 mol % higher than the amount of functionalised monomer of Formula (I), or at last 20 mol % higher. Typically, the amount of masking agent is less than 500 mol % of monomer according to formula (I). In some occasions, higher amounts may be used or may be necessary.
Examples of masking agents are silyl halides, trialkyl aluminium complexes, dialkyl magnesium complexes, dialkyl zinc complexes or trialkyl boron complexes. In the process of the invention, it is preferred that the masking agent is selected from trialkyl aluminium complexes, dialkyl magnesium complexes, dialkyl zinc complexes or trialkyl boron complexes. Preferred complexes are trialkyl aluminium complexes. Preferably, these trialkyl aluminium complexes have bulky substituents, like for example isobutyl groups. The most preferred masking agent is triisobutylaluminium.
The amount of monomeric moieties having a functional group ranges between 0.1 and 5 mol %, preferably between 0.11 and 2 mol %, as determined with 1H NMR.
The amount of non-functionalised α-olefins other than ethylene in case the polymer is a PE based polymer or other than propylene when the polymer is a polypropylene based polymer is selected to achieve a functionalised copolymer with a crystallinity ranging between 0-35% as determined with DSC. Preferably, the melt temperature (Tm) (according to DSC) of a PE based sensor is below 100° C. The Tm of a PP-based sensor is below 125° C.
In some embodiments, the amount of non-functionalised α-olefins other than ethylene in case the polymer is a PE based polymer or other than propylene when the polymer is a polypropylene based polymer ranges between 0 and 15 mol %, preferably between 0.1 and 10, more preferably between 0.2 and 5 mol %, even more preferably between 0.3 and 3 mol % of the all when hexene is used.
In some embodiments, the density of the polyolefin which can be used in the sensor of the present invention is below 0.89 g/ml, preferably below 0.88 g/ml.
In some embodiments, the Mn of the polyolefin of the sensor may ranges from 5,000-500,000, preferably 50,000-200,000.
Preferably, the functional groups of the functionalised polyolefins are protic functional groups, preferably —OH or —COOH groups. The protic groups can also be partially or fully deprotonated to obtain a partially or fully polyolefinic ionomeric system, typically comprising metal or ammonium cations. According to the invention, the polyolefinic ionomer may comprise electrostatic interactions between multiple monoanionic polar functionalities at the polymer chain and mono- or multi-valent metal cations (like Na+ or Zn2+) or monocationic ammonium ions (like NH4+) or polycationic ammonium ions (like H3N+CH2CH2NH3+). The electrostatic interactions within the polyolefinic ionomers can be tuned by selecting the proper type and/or amount of metal salts (monovalent versus multi-valent metal ions), ammonium salts or amines (monofunctional or polyfunctional ammonium salts or amines).
A polyolefinic ionomer according to the invention, may be so that it comprises multi-charge electrostatic interactions and comprises between 0.05 and 10 mol. equivalent, preferably between 0.2 and 8 mol. equivalent, further preferred between 0.4 and 5 mol. equivalent of a salt of a mono-valent metal salt or multi-valent metal salt, a monofunctional ammonium salt or polyfunctional ammonium salt or a monofunctional amine or polyfunctional amine with respect to the mol % of functionalised olefin monomers incorporated in the copolymer.
The sensor can contain hydrogen bond enhancing agents that are able to further stabilise the polar domains of the sensor containing the sensing compound. Hydrogen bond enhancing agents are agents that strengthen the intra-polymer hydrogen bonding interactions. According to the invention, such hydrogen bond enhancing agents are polyols, polyamines, polyacids, polyethers, polyesters, polycarbonates, polyamides, polyurethanes, polyureas, polysaccharides, polypeptides and combinations of at least two of said hydrogen bond enhancing agents. In that respect the term “poly” means a material having two or more functionalities that are capable of interacting with the functionalised polyolefin. Examples of such polyfunctional materials include ethylene glycol, glycerol, pentaerythritol, EVOH, EVA, mucic acid, galactaric acid, carbohydrates, ethylene diamine, diethylene triamine, tetramethyl ethylene diamine, pentamethyl diethylene triamine, polyethylenimine, maleic acid, succinic acid, tartaric acid, citric acid, polyacrylic acid, polyHEMA (polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate), poly(ethylene-co-acrylic acid), polyvinyl acetate, poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate), polyvinyl alcohol, poly(ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol), polyethylene oxide, polypropylene oxide, poly(ethylene oxide-co-propylene oxide), poly(ethylene carbonate), poly(propylene carbonate), polylactones, polymacrolactones, polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), polycaprolactone, poly(ethylene brassylate), polylactide, polybutylene adipate, polybutylene adipate terephthalate, polyamide 6, polyamide 4,6, polyamide 6,6, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate, poly(2-aminoethyl methacrylate) Polytetrahydrofuran and combinations of at least two of the foregoing hydrogen bond enhancing agents. Preferred materials are those capable of forming hydrogen bonds with the functionalised polyolefin.
The amount of hydrogen bond enhancing agent is preferably from 0.01 to 10 wt. %, preferably from 0.03 to 7 wt. %, more preferably from 0.05 to 5 wt. %, based on the combined weight of the functionalised olefin copolymer and the hydrogen bond enhancing agent. The amount of hydrogen bond enhancing agent, possibly together with the type of hydrogen bond enhancing agent, can be used to tune the desired material properties.
The sensor can contain polar solvents, which can be used for dissolving the sensing compound.
Examples of polar solvents are: water, alcohols such as methanol, ethanol, propanol, butanol, ethylene glycol, glycerol, formic acid, acetic acid, DMSO, DMF, NMP, ethyl acetate, propylene carbonate. Combinations of these solvents can also be applied, for example a combination of water and an alcohol (like for example ethanol).
The amount of polar solvent ranges between 0 and 30 wt % relative to the weight of the sensor, preferably between 5 and 15 wt %.
Sensing compounds can be any compounds that are at least partly soluble in polar media and show a change upon change of the environment.
Examples of sensing compounds are pH indicators and/or redox indicators.
Examples of pH and/or redox indicators are methyl red, phenolophthalein, thymol blue, bromocresol purple, α-Naphtholbenzein, methylene blue, thionine, Indophenol, diphenylaminesulfonic acid, Indigo carmine, N,N-diphenylbenzidine.
Typical examples of substrates to be detected by the sensors are for example COx, O2, NH3, SO2, HCl, Cl2, Br2 and NxOy; x=1, 2; y=1, 2;
The sensor can be prepared for example by dissolving the polymer containing functional groups in toluene and mix this with an aqueous or alcoholic solution of the sensing compound. Consequently, a certain amount of the water or alcohol (or any other polar solvent used to dissolve the sensing compound), but typically no more than 30 wt % relative to the weight of the sensor, will end up in the polar domain as well.
The sensor is made of a thermoplastic functionalised polyolefin, and can be made available in any form. Examples of sensors can be thin films, sheets, circles and the like.
The functionalised polyolefin matrix of the sensor typically has sufficient adhesive force to adhere to a wide variety of surfaces. If needed, an additional adhesive can be applied to help to adhere the sensor to a substrate. The thin films can be prepared by any known means, as long as the sensing compound is stable and the microstructure of the sensor having an apolar matrix and polar domains within said apolar matrix stays intact. Examples of preparation can be injection molding or compression molding, coextrusion, laminating of a thin sheet of sensor material to a substrate and the like.
The substrate can in principle be any suitable substrate, such as a microporous film, a non-porous film, a multilayer material and the like.
The sensor may contain more than one sensing compound.
The sensor can be used for measuring gases, pH of an environment, presence of oxygen and other gases, for example in food applications, like control of food quality, in medical applications.
The invention also relates to the use of the sensor in smart packaging and to smart packaging material containing the sensor.
All manipulations were performed under an inert dry nitrogen atmosphere using either standard Schlenk or glove box techniques. Pentamethyl heptane (PMH) and heptane were employed as solvents for PP-based sensors and polymerisation experiments and were supplied by Brenntag Netherlands. 1-Hexene was purchased from Sigma Aldrich and was distilled over a sodium/potassium alloy with benzophenone as an indicator under inert atmosphere. Toluene, methanol, D-mannose, methylene blue, potassium hydroxide, methyl red were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, 10-undecene-1-ol, 10-undecenoic acid and 3-buten-1-ol were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and dried under an inert atmosphere using standard distillation techniques. Methylaluminoxane (MAO, 30 wt. % solution in toluene) was purchased from Chemtura. Diethyl zinc (DEZ, 1.0 M solution in toluene) and triisobutyl aluminium (TiBA, 1.0 M solution in hexanes) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. (C5Me4(SiMe2NtBu)TiCl2) catalyst was prepared according to literature procedure described in Organometallics 1990, 9, 867-869 and Chem. Ber. 1990, 123, 1649-1651 and rac-Me2Si(2-Me-4-Ph-Ind)2ZrCl2 was purchased from MCAT GmbH, Konstanz, Germany.
The polymerisation reaction was carried out in a 2 L stainless steel reactor. Prior to the polymerisation, the reactor was washed with 1.5 L heptane containing TiBA (1.0 M solution in toluene, 2 mL) at 150° C. Subsequently, heptane (1.5 L), TiBA (1.0 M solution in toluene, 2.0 mL), MAO (15 wt. % solution in toluene, 2.0 mL), TiBA protected 10-undecen-1-ol (20 mmol) and 1-hexene (160 mmol) were introduced into the reactor and stirred at 300 rpm at 50° C. The reactor was vented off, the temperature was raised to 80° C. and the solvent was saturated with propylene (5 bar). In a glovebox, a stock solution of Me2Si(2-Me-4-Ph-Ind)2ZrCl2 catalyst in toluene (5 mL) was prepared and the MAO activated catalyst solution (0.6 μmol) and DEZ (1.0 M solution in toluene, 0.5 mL) were transferred into the reactor using an overpressure of nitrogen. The propylene pressure was maintained constant during the polymerisation time (40 min). At the end of the polymerisation, the propylene feed was stopped and the residual propylene was vented off. The reaction mixture was quenched with acidified isopropanol (300 mL, 2.5 wt. % of acetic acid), filtered and washed with demineralised water. The resulting powder was dried in a vacuum oven under reduced pressure at 60° C. overnight.
A similar procedure was applied in propylene copolymerisation with 10-undecenoic acid (entry 10, Table 1) using Me2Si(2-Me-4-Ph-Ind)2ZrCl2 and propylene copolymerisation with 3-buten-1-ol (entries 2-4, Table 2), 10-undecen-1-ol (entry 5, Table 2) and 10-unedecenoic acid (entry 6, Table 2) using [C5Me4SiMe2NtBu]TiCl2 catalysts (Table 2).
PP-co-1-hexene-co-C11OH (1 g, Table 1, entry 6) was dissolved in PMH (60 mL) containing Irganox 1010 (10 mg) at 90° C. for 1 h. Subsequently, to the polymer solution, 60 mL of demineralised water was added and the suspension was gently stirred. Than an alcohol/water (30/20 v/v) mixture, containing methyl red (5.0 mL, 0.0037 mmol), was introduced and stirred for 1 h at 90° C. and was subsequently allowed to cool to room temperature under stirring. The PP-co-1-hexene-co-C11OH, containing methyl red was filtered, dried at 60° C. in the vacuum oven for 24 hours. All the sample plaques were prepared via compression-molding using PP ISO settings on LabEcon 600 high-temperature press (Fontijne Presses, the Netherlands). Then, the compression-molding cycle was applied: heating to 210° C., stabilising for 5 min with no force applied, 5 min with 100 kN normal force and cooling down to 40° C. with 15° C./min and 100 kN normal force. The above-described procedure was applied for all the materials listed in Tables 1-2. The OH and COOH functionalised samples revealing higher crystallinity level than 35% (entries 8-9, Table 1) and non-functionalised PP samples (entry 11, Table 1) did not reveal significant affinity to the sensing compound and no clear colour change could be observed when exposing these samples to acidic or basic conditions.
PP-co-1-hexene-co-C11OH (1 g, Table 1, entry 6) was dissolved in toluene (60 mL) containing Irganox 1010 (10 mg) at 100° C. for 1 h. The solution was stirred under reduced pressure to remove oxygen traces. Subsequently, to the polymer solution 20 mL of D-mannose (0.1 M aqueous solution) and methylene blue (0.1 g, 0.03 mmol) and KOH (0.1 M aqueous solution) were added to obtain a colourless solution. All the manipulations were carried out under nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was stirred at 100° C. for 1 h and subsequently allowed to cool to room temperature under stirring. Afterwards, the polymer containing oxygen sensor was recovered by solvent evaporation under reduced pressure. Upon exposing the polymer to air, the colour of the material turned blue.
The OH and COOH functionalised samples revealing higher crystallinity level than 35% (entries 8-9, Table 1) and non-functionalised PP samples (entry 11, Table 1) did not reveal significant affinity to the sensing compound and no clear colour change could be observed when exposing these samples to air.
1H NMR Characterisation.
The percentage of functionalisation was determined by 1H NMR analysis carried out at 130° C. using deuterated tetrachloroethane (TCE-d2) as the solvent and recorded in 5 mm tubes on a Varian Mercury spectrometer operating at a frequency of 400 MHz. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm versus tetramethylsilane and were determined by reference to the residual solvent protons.
High Temperature Size Exclusion Chromatography (HT-SEC).
The molecular weights, reported in kg/mol, and the PDI were determined by means of high temperature size exclusion chromatography, which was performed at 150° C. in a GPC-IR instrument equipped with an IR4 detector and a carbonyl sensor (PolymerChar, Valencia, Spain). Column set: three Polymer Laboratories 13 μm PLgel Olexis, 300×7.5 mm. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (o-DCB) was used as eluent at a flow rate of 1 mL·min-1. The molecular weights and the corresponding PDIs were calculated from HT SEC analysis with respect to narrow polystyrene standards (PSS, Mainz, Germany).
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC).
Thermal analysis was carried out on a DSC 0100 from TA Instruments at a heating rate of 5° C.·min−1. First and second runs were recorded after cooling down to ca. −20° C. The melting temperatures reported correspond to second runs. The degree of crystallinity was derived from the DSC data by the comparison of the enthalpy of fusion measured at the melting point of the synthesized polymers and the enthalpy of fusion of a totally crystalline polymer measured at the equilibrium melting point (for more details for example see Polymer 2002, 43, 3873-3878).
The enthalpy of fusion of a totally crystalline polypropylene is reported to be 207.1 J/g, while the enthalpy of fusion of a totally crystalline polyethylene is 293.6 J/g.
[a]Conditions: rac-Me2Si(2-Me-4-Ph-Ind)2ZrCl2 = 0.6 μmol, heptane = 1.5 L, propylene = 5 bar, reaction temperature = 80° C., reaction time = 40 min, MAO (15 wt % solution in toluene, 2 mL), DEZ (1.0M solution in toluene) = 0.5 mL, TiBA (1.0 M solution in toluene) = 2 mL.
[b]C11═OH is 10-undecen-1-ol and was pacified using 1.0 equiv. of TiBA (1.0M solution in toluene), C10═COOH is 10-undecenoic acid and was pacified using 2.0 equiv. of TiBA (1.0M solution in toluene)
[c]The yield was obtained under non-optimised conditions and determined using the weight of polymer obtained after filtration and drying in vacuum oven overnight at 60° C..
[d]10-undecen-1-ol or 10-undecenoic acid incorporation level as determined by 1H NMR and 1-hexene incorporation was determined using 13C NMR.
[e]Determined by DSC. Xc is determined by dividing the enthalpy of fusion of the polymer sample by 207.1 and multiplying by 100%.
[a][C5Me4SiMe2NtBu]TiCl2 (2 μmol), heptane = 1.5 L, propylene = 5 bar, reaction temperature = 50° C., reaction time = 40 min, MAO (15 wt % solution in toluene, 4 mL), TiBA (1.0M solution in toluene, 2 mL).
[b]C4═OH and C11═OH are 3-buten-1-ol and 10-undecen-1-ol, respectively and were pacified with 1.0 equiv. of TiBA (1.0M solution in toluene), C10═COOH is 10-undecenoic acid and was pacified using 2.0 equiv. of TiBA (1.0M solution in toluene).
[c]The yield was obtained under non-optimised conditions and determined using the weight of polymer obtained after filtration and drying in a vacuum oven overnight at 60° C..
[d]3-buten-1-ol, 10-undecen-1-ol and 10-undecenoic acid incorporation levels as determined by 1H NMR. Those samples were found amorphous as determined by DSC.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19169379.5 | Apr 2019 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2020/059055 | 3/31/2020 | WO | 00 |
