Single-use containers, such as bioreactors, are useful for generating and supporting biological reactions for any number of purposes. Biological reactions can be susceptible to changes in temperature and/or pressure. Moreover, as the biological reaction progresses, the reaction itself may change various parameters within the bioreactor, such as the pressure. Accordingly, it may be important to monitor pressure or other variables of the biological reaction.
The life sciences industry is moving from large, capital-intensive facilities made of stainless steel with large clean-in-place (CIP) infrastructure to smaller facilities that use polymeric bags or containers functioning as bioreactors. The bioreactor bag is used once and then discarded. This single-use bioreactor technique significantly reduces the capital cost of the plant. For example, in existing facilities that use stainless steel CIP infrastructure, up to 90% of the cost of operating the facility may be due to the clean-in-place infrastructure, including very high end instrumentation designed to withstand a steam cleaning cycle. By moving to disposable, single-use bioreactor bags, the CIP portion of the capital can be eliminated and the facility can be more flexible and much smaller, which, in turn, allows the production of the smaller batches that are needed for more targeted drug therapies and other smaller-scale applications.
As pharmaceutical manufacturers change over from large stainless-steel process vessels to smaller-volume, pre-sterilized, disposable plastic bag systems, there is a need to measure pressure and/or other variables in these systems to control the growth environment and subsequent processes. Typically, pharmaceutical manufacturers and the life science industry in general, have used pressure sensors that are pre-sterilized and are disposed of after a single-use, which, in turn, has driven the life sciences industry to use inexpensive sensors. Such inexpensive sensors use relatively crude methods for fluid isolation, such as silicone gel. These methods can lead to inaccurate measurements, which are generally unacceptable to the life sciences industry for supporting the various biological reactions.
A single-use sensor interface for coupling a single-use container to a re-usable sensing instrument is provided. The single-use sensor interface includes a polymeric flange couplable to a wall of the single-use container. The polymeric flange has a sidewall and an interface portion configured to receive a deflectable polymeric diaphragm. A deflectable polymeric diaphragm is coupled to the interface portion of the polymeric flange. An instrument coupling portion is sealingly coupled to the polymeric flange.
Another single-use sensor interface for coupling a single-use container to a re-usable sensing instrument includes a polymeric hose adapter and at least one instrument attachment portion. The polymeric hose adapter portion has at least one hose barb configured to retain a hose slid thereover. The hose adapter portion has at least one interface portion that is configured to receive a deflectable polymeric diaphragm. A deflectable polymeric diaphragm is coupled to the interface portion. At least one instrument attachment portion is coupled to the hose adapter portion. The at least one instrument attachment portion has a cylindrical sidewall configure to receive a remote seal assembly or a measuring instrument.
Embodiments of the present invention generally leverage a polymeric sensor interface that couples a single-use container, such as a bioreactor, to a high-precision, re-usable pressure measuring instrument. Accordingly, the actual sensor that measures the pressure within the bioreaction vessel is disposed within the high-precision pressure measurement instrument. In some embodiments, a remote seal system is formed of a polymeric material that is pre-sterilized and may be physically coupled to a pre-sterilized single-use bioreactor. In other embodiments, the polymeric sensor interface may be coupled directly to a re-usable measuring instrument, such as a pressure transmitter. Accordingly, the bioreactor as well as the polymeric sensor interface are disposable. This allows the use of an accurate and precise re-usable pressure transmitter but still provides the end user with a pre-sterilized connection to the bioreaction vessel. The field instrument-side and the process-side couplings will be described separately below. Embodiments of the present invention include any combination of the various process-side configurations with any of the various instrument-side configurations.
Polymeric remote seal system 114 couples the pressure within single-use bioreactor bag 110 to pressure measuring instrument 104. This coupling is a fluidic coupling such that pressure acting against a diaphragm disposed proximate process connection 116 generates movement of fluid within coupling 106 to cause associated movement at a diaphragm proximate instrument coupling 118. Such movement conveys the fluid pressure from bioreactor bag 110 to a pressure sensor within instrument 104 such that the pressure can be measured very accurately. Moreover, instrument 104 generally includes characterization and/or calibration information in order to compensate for variations in temperature and/or other environmental variables. Further, various embodiments of instrument 104 may also perform diagnostics relative to the device itself and/or the biological reaction in order to provide additional information instead of simply reporting the pressure within single-use bioreactor bag 110. Further still, instrument 104 may also be configured to convey the pressure information to one or more additional devices via a process communication loop or segment, such as that in accordance with the Highway Addressable Remote Transducer (HART®) protocol or the FOUNDATION™ Fieldbus protocol. Moreover, embodiments described herein may also include wirelessly transmitting such pressure information to any suitable device via antenna 120 in accordance with a wireless process communication protocol, such as IEC62591. In one embodiment, instrument 104 is a commercially-available hygienic pressure transmitter sold under the trade designation Model 3051HT available from Emerson Automation Solutions of Shakopee, Minn.
Embodiments described herein provide a convenient way to measure variables within a single-use container while still ensuring that high quality measurements are used. The polymeric sensor interface can be disposed of or left with the single-use container once the container is empty or replaced. This allows the use and re-use of an accurate, complex wireless measurement instrument with different single-use containers without cleaning as the instrument is isolated from the single-use container. When active monitoring of a single-use container is no longer required, the polymeric interface can be disconnected from the measuring instrument or gauge and disposed or left with the single-use container. Then, the same measuring instrument or gauge can be coupled to another polymeric sensor interface of another single-use container.
While the embodiment described with respect to
Coupling of the adapter to the re-usable measuring instrument may be through a remote seal arrangement or may be direct coupling. In a remote seal arrangement, instrument attachment portion 912 is still eventually coupled to a pressure measurement instrument such as a process fluid pressure transmitter or other suitable device. Although
In accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, a single-use adapter can be provided in various configurations that enable it to be a coupled to a single-use bioreactor bag port; used in line with tubing, for low measurement; or used with standard hose barb bioreactor bag connections (such as the embodiment described with respect to
Accordingly, various embodiments of the present invention set forth above can employ a single-use polymeric sensor interface or adapter that can be used with single-use bioreactor bags, tubing, or single-use biopharmaceutical manufacturing systems. In some embodiments, a fluid-filled remote diaphragm seal pressure transmitter system can be attached to such an adapter but is separated therefrom by a thin polymeric barrier that is integrated into the adapter. In other embodiments, a measuring instrument, such as a pressure transmitter is coupled directly to the sensor interface. In all such embodiments, the interface seals the contents of the single-use container from the re-usable measuring instrument using a process barrier. This barrier enables the pressure transducer and/or remote diaphragm seal to be reused and also not require sterilization. The single-use adapter has multiple embodiments, as described above, that enable it to be a bag port that is integrated into a single-use bag; used in-line with tubing, for flow measurement or pressure measurement; or used with a standard hose barb bioreactor bag connection.
Embodiments described herein can use a three-piece welded construction of a disposable adapter where the process isolating barrier is captured between the welded process adapter and remote seal connection creating an hermetic barrier while itself remaining un-welded, this allows for more optimal materials to be used for the barrier than other all-welded solutions. Further, some embodiments of the isolating barrier and adapter may interface directly with standard hose barb connections thereby allowing existing off-the-shelf bioreactor bags from multiple vendors to be used without modification or custom weld ports. Finally, reusable diaphragm seals or pressure transducers, in accordance with various embodiments described herein, may be clamped to the adapter and barrier with any suitable type of clamp, such as a bayonet-style locking clamp that may provide positive locking feedback and integral damage protection during removal.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1786101 | Welch | Dec 1930 | A |
3374674 | Schwartzman | Mar 1968 | A |
3821897 | Frazel | Jul 1974 | A |
4297871 | Wright | Nov 1981 | A |
4989456 | Slupecky | Feb 1991 | A |
5460049 | Kirsch | Oct 1995 | A |
6602401 | Feng | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6894502 | Feng et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6979307 | Beretta | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7784353 | Feldmeier | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7924017 | Ammann et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7972495 | Millar et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8123397 | Baumfalk et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8252582 | Bamfalk et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8304231 | Roll | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8640560 | Burke | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8900855 | Feng et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8828202 | Feng | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9029130 | Feng et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9267100 | Selker et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20010028865 | Cummings et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020072084 | Meserol et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030168403 | Corcho-Sanchez | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040027912 | Bibbo et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040140211 | Broy et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050163667 | Krause | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050225035 | Sundet | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060228804 | Xu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070151349 | Schumacher et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080032389 | Selker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080053255 | Furey et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090130704 | Gyure | May 2009 | A1 |
20090139298 | Klees et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100302008 | Engelstad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110041619 | Delbos et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110201100 | Proulx | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120240666 | Blomberg et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120242993 | Shick et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120290268 | Bey | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130055821 | Bentley | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130145818 | Allgauer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140207016 | Addington | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150030514 | Feltham | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150316528 | Schumacher | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160298068 | Schumacher | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170003183 | Fadell et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101839776 | Sep 2010 | CN |
205620076 | Oct 2016 | CN |
0399227 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0753737 | Jan 1997 | EP |
2065701 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2364125 | Jan 2001 | GB |
2008039523 | Feb 2008 | JP |
1992-001218 | Jan 1992 | WO |
2008016411 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2009-017765 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2013-162394 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2013180853 | Dec 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016024859, dated Jul. 12, 2016, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/028884, dated Jul. 28, 2016, 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/064125, dated Mar. 13, 2017, 16 pages. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 15/278,766, “Single-Use Bioreactor Sensor Interface” filed Sep. 28, 2016, 18 pages. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 15/072,128, “Flow Measurement System for Single-Use Containers”, filed Mar. 16, 2016, 15 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180059710.06, dated Auggust 22, 2014, 12 pages with English translation. |
Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180059710.06, dated Feb. 24, 2014, 12 pages with English translation. |
Theory and Practice of pH Measurement, PN 44-6033/rev. D, dated Dec. 2010 by Rosemount Analytical, Emerson Process Management, 40 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210085580.X, dated Jun. 11, 2014, 14 pages including English translation. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2818943, dated Jul. 30, 2014, 2 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510197804.X, dated Jan. 26, 2017, 21 pages including English translation. |
Patent Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Patent Application No. 2015253275, dated Nov. 15, 2016, 4 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/028192, dated Nov. 17, 2016, 15 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Rules 161(2) and 162 for European Patent Application No. 15786477.8, dated Dec. 9, 2016, 2 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/028192, dated Jul. 27, 2015, 18 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCTR/US2011/065032, dated Apr. 26, 2012, 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCTR/US2011/065033, dated Mar. 19, 2012, 16 pages. |
Pharmaceutical Industry Solutions: Reliable Liquid Analysis, Brochure by Rosemount Analytical, Emerson Process Management, dated 2005, 12 pages. |
S. Schmitmeir et al. Development and Characterization of a Small-Scale Bioreactor Based on a Bioartificial Hepatic Culture Model for Predictive Pharmacological In Vitro Screenings, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 95, No. 6, dated Dec. 20, 2006, 10 pages. |
Application Data Sheet, Tighter pH Control in Pharmaceutical Applications, Jan. 2008, by Rosemount Analytical, Emerson Process Management, 2 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 30, 2018, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/065254, 15 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201710211756.4 dated Nov. 19, 2019, 18pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 24, 2020 for European Application No. 17882349.8, 7 pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2020 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201710211756.4, 33 pages including English translation. |
Japanese Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2020 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-503861, 9 pages including English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180179486 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |