The present subject matter relates generally to the treatment of engine exhaust gases generated by work vehicles and, more particularly, to sensor shields for use within exhaust treatment systems of work vehicles for increasing the accuracy or reliability of a downstream exhaust sensor.
Typically, work vehicles, such as tractors and other agricultural vehicles, include an exhaust treatment system for controlling engine emissions. As is generally understood, exhaust treatment systems for work vehicles often include a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) system in fluid communication with a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system. The DOC system is generally configured to oxidize carbon monoxide and unburnt hydrocarbons contained within the engine exhaust and may include a mixing chamber for mixing an exhaust reductant, such as a diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) or any other suitable urea-based fluid, into the engine exhaust. For instance, the exhaust reductant is often pumped from a reductant tank mounted on and/or within the vehicle and injected onto the mixing chamber to mix the reductant with the engine exhaust. The resulting mixture may then be supplied to the SCR system to allow the reductant to be reacted with a catalyst in order to reduce the amount of nitrous oxide (NOx) emissions contained within the engine exhaust. A NOx sensor is typically positioned downstream of the SCR system to monitor the amount of NOx emissions still remaining in the exhaust flow exiting the exhaust treatment system. The data from the sensor may, for example, be used to control the combustion temperature of the engine and/or the amount of reductant injected into the mixing chamber to ensure that the amount of NOx emissions remains below a given amount.
Many SCR systems include multiple different catalyst lines, which are combined upstream of the NOx sensor. However, in many instances, the engine exhaust associated with separate catalyst lines may not be fully mixed before encountering the NOx sensor. As such, the NOx sensor may underestimate or overestimate a concentration of NOx within the exhaust gas associated with the exhaust treatment system. Overestimating the amount of NOx within the engine exhaust may result in an excessive amount of the reductant being injected into the engine exhaust. This can lead to clogging of the catalyst lines, increased reductant consumption, higher backpressure within the exhaust treatment system, and/or increased ammonia slip within the exhaust treatment system. Contrarily, injecting an inadequate amount of the reductant may lead to excessive NOx emissions contained within the engine exhaust gas. Additionally, the exhaust gas my contain liquid droplets that can impinge on the NOx sensor and cause damage to the NOx sensor or negatively affect the performance of the NOx sensor, such as lowering the accuracy of the NOx sensor.
Accordingly, an improved sensor assembly that increases the accuracy of an exhaust sensor positioned within a flow conduit of an exhaust treatment system would be welcomed in the technology.
Aspects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the following description, or may be obvious from the description, or may be learned through practice of the invention.
In one aspect, the present subject matter is directed to a sensor assembly for use within a flow conduit of an exhaust treatment system of a work vehicle. The flow conduit including an upstream end and a downstream end and is configured to receive a treated exhaust at the upstream end for flow towards the downstream end. The sensor assembly includes an exhaust sensor positioned within the flow conduit between the upstream and downstream ends. Moreover, the exhaust sensor is configured to detect an amount of an emission gas present in the treated exhaust. The sensor assembly further includes a sensor shield positioned within the flow conduit upstream of the exhaust sensor. The sensor shield includes a hub and a plurality of flow divider beams extending from the hub. Additionally, the sensor shield creates a wake area downstream of the hub within which a turbulent exhaust flow is generated as the treated exhaust is directed past the sensor shield. Furthermore, the exhaust sensor is configured to receive the turbulent exhaust flow from the wake area.
In another aspect, the present subject matter is directed to an exhaust treatment system for a work vehicle. The exhaust treatment system includes a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system configured to react a mixture of exhaust reductant and engine exhaust with a catalyst to generate a treated exhaust. The SCR system further includes an SCR outlet for expelling the treated exhaust therefrom. The exhaust treatment system also includes a flow conduit including an upstream end and a downstream end, the flow conduit in fluid communication with the SCR outlet for receiving the treated exhaust expelled from the SCR system. The exhaust treatment system additionally includes an exhaust sensor positioned within the flow conduit between the upstream and downstream ends. Moreover, the exhaust sensor is configured to detect an amount of an emission gas present in the treated exhaust. The exhaust treatment system further includes a sensor shield positioned within the flow conduit upstream of the exhaust sensor. The sensor shield includes a hub and a plurality of flow divider beams extending from the hub. Additionally, the sensor shield creates a wake area downstream of the hub within which a turbulent exhaust flow is generated as the treated exhaust is directed past the sensor shield. Furthermore, the exhaust sensor is configured to receive the turbulent exhaust flow from the wake area.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present technology will become better understood with reference to the following description and appended claims. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the technology and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the technology.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present technology, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended figures, in which:
Repeat use of reference characters in the present specification and drawings is intended to represent the same or analogous features or elements of the present technology.
Reference now will be made in detail to embodiments of the invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment can be used with another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
In general, the present subject matter is directed to a sensor assembly suitable for use within a fluid conduit of an exhaust treatment system for a work vehicle. The flow conduit generally includes upstream and downstream ends and is configured to receive a treated exhaust at the upstream end and flow such treated gas towards the downstream end. The sensor assembly includes an exhaust sensor positioned within the flow conduit between the upstream and downstream ends. The exhaust sensor is configured to detect an amount of an emission gas present in the treated exhaust, such as an amount of NOx contained within the treated exhaust. The sensor assembly further includes a sensor shield positioned within the flow conduit upstream of the exhaust sensor. The sensor shield is positioned such that the treated exhaust must generally impact the sensor shield before encountering the exhaust sensor.
In one embodiment, the sensor shield includes a hub (e.g., generally positioned at a center of the sensor shield) and a plurality of flow divider beams extending from the hub. Additionally, in one embodiment, the sensor shield is configured to create a wake area downstream of the hub within which a turbulent exhaust flow is generated as the treated exhaust is directed past the sensor shield, with the turbulent exhaust flow from the wake area being subsequently received by the downstream exhaust sensor. The hub may generally prevent the treated exhaust from flowing directly from the upstream end of the flow conduit and impinging on the exhaust sensor. For instance, treated exhaust impacting the hub and/or flow divider beams may create turbulence within the exhaust flow prior to such exhaust flow being directed into the wake area. In several embodiments, the flow divider beams are configured to funnel treated exhaust at different positions within the flow conduit towards the wake area. In at least one embodiment, the funneled, treated exhaust at the different positions may be associated with treated flow of different catalyst lines of an associated SCR system of the exhaust treatment system. As such, the treated exhaust funneled to the wake area may be mixed in order to form a more homogenous turbulent exhaust as compared to the treated exhaust. Furthermore, the treated exhaust may be simultaneously accelerated and/or turned as it flows around the flow divider beams and is funneled towards the wake area. Such acceleration and turning may shed liquid particles contained within the treated exhaust.
The sensor shield is therefore configured to promote mixing of portions of the treated exhaust by introducing turbulence into one or more of the exhaust flow portions and funneling such portions of the exhaust towards the wake area. By more effectively mixing the treated exhaust flow portions within the wake area, the sensor readings from the downstream exhaust sensor may more accurately represent harmful or undesirable gas emissions within the treated exhaust flow as a whole. Furthermore, an associated controller may implement a control action, such as adjusting the combustion temperature of the engine and/or varying the amount of reductant injected into the exhaust treatment system, based on a more accurately determined amount of exhaust emissions contained within the treated exhaust flow. As such, the disadvantages associated with inaccurate emissions readings may be reduced or eliminated. For instance, overestimation of the amount of emissions within the exhaust flow may be avoided and thus prevent or reduce the amount of reductant injected in response. Several issues associated with excessive reductant injection may thus be avoided, such as clogging of the catalyst lines, increased reductant consumption, higher backpressure within the exhaust treatment system, and/or increased ammonia slip within the exhaust treatment system. Similarly, issues associated with inadequate reductant injection in response to underestimation of the amount of emissions within the engine exhaust flow may similarly be avoided, such as excessive NOx emissions contained within the treated exhaust flow. In addition, by shedding liquid droplets within the treated exhaust forming the turbulent exhaust, the likelihood of such liquid droplets impinging on or otherwise contacting the exhaust sensor may be reduced and thus, by extension, substantially reduce a likelihood of sensor failure or damage due to liquid droplets impinging on or otherwise contacting the exhaust sensor.
Furthermore, a suitable sensor shield as described herein may be a simple addition to the assembly process of exhaust treatment systems and/or may easily be installed into preexisting exhaust treatment systems. For instance, several embodiments of the disclosed sensor shield may be easily manufactured and assembled and have minimal spacing requirements within the flow conduit. Additionally, the sensor shield described herein may have a very small cross-sectional footprint within the flow conduit and thus have minimal effects on the system backpressure.
Referring now to the drawings,
As shown in
Moreover, the work vehicle 100 may also include an exhaust treatment system 200 for reducing the amount emissions contained within the exhaust from the engine 114. For instance, engine exhaust expelled from the engine 114 may be directed through the exhaust treatment system 200 to allow the levels of nitrous oxide (NOx) emissions contained within the exhaust to be reduced significantly. The cleaned or treated exhaust gases may then be expelled from the exhaust treatment system 200 into the surrounding environment via an exhaust pipe 120 of the work vehicle 100.
It should be appreciated that the configuration of the work vehicle 100 described above and shown in
Referring now to
The engine exhaust and exhaust reductant flowing into the upstream end 214 of the mixing conduit 206 are then directed through the conduit 206 to the downstream end 224 thereof for receipt by the SCR system 208, within which the mixture of exhaust/reductant is reacted with a catalyst to generate a treated exhaust flow in which the amount of harmful or undesirable gas emissions has been reduced as compared to the engine exhaust initially discharged from the engine 114. In one embodiment, the SCR system 208 may define multiple catalyst lines. For instance, the SCR system 208 may house multiple SCR chambers defining, at least in part, separate catalyst lines and associated flowpaths through the SCR system 208. Furthermore, the SCR system 208 may be configured to combine and mix the treated exhaust flow from the separate catalyst lines into a total treated exhaust flow before being expelled from the SCR outlet 230 of the SCR system 208, e.g., into the downstream flow conduit 210. For instance, the SCR system 208 may include an outlet chamber positioned proximate to the SCR outlet 230 configured to promote mixing of the treated exhaust flows from separate catalyst lines. The total treated exhaust flow is then expelled from a SCR outlet 230 of the SCR system 208 and is directed through the downstream flow conduit 210 for discharge into the atmosphere (e.g., via an exhaust pipe 120 forming part of or coupled to the downstream flow conduit 210).
Additionally, as shown in
Moreover, the exhaust treatment system 200 may also include a sensor shield 304 positioned within the downstream flow conduit 210 upstream of the exhaust sensor 250, such as at or adjacent to the outlet 230 of the SCR system 208. As will be described in greater detail below, the sensor shield 304 may be configured to generate turbulence within the treated exhaust flow expelled from the SCR system 208. Such turbulent flows may facilitate enhanced mixing of the treated exhaust immediately upstream of the exhaust sensor 250, thereby allowing the sensor 250 to provide more accurate data related to the concentration or amount of the gaseous emission(s) being monitored (e.g., NOx). In addition, the sensor shield 304 may impede any water or other liquid droplets contained within the treated exhaust flow from impinging or otherwise contacting the exhaust sensor 250.
Referring now to
In general, the sensor shield 304 of the sensor assembly 300 is positioned within the flow conduit 210 upstream of the exhaust sensor 250 in order to introduce turbulence within a treated exhaust 302 (which may include multiple treated exhaust flow portions 316, 318, 320, 322 corresponding to separate catalyst lines of the SCR system 208) in order to generate a turbulent exhaust flow 314 that is more homogenously mixed as compared to the treated exhaust 302. By more evenly mixing the treated exhaust 302, the resulting turbulent exhaust flow 314 encountering the exhaust sensor 250 may more accurately represent the concentration or amount of emissions remaining within the treated exhaust 302. Furthermore, a central portion or hub 306 of the sensor shield 306 may prevent liquid particles within the treated exhaust 302 from impinging on the exhaust sensor 250, which may prevent damage to the exhaust sensor 250 and generally increase the accuracy of the exhaust sensor 250.
As shown in
In order to promote more effective mixing of the exhaust flow portions 316, 318, 320, 322 of the treated exhaust 302 and/or to reduce the liquid particles within the exhaust encountering the exhaust sensor 250, the sensor shield 304 is positioned within the downstream flow conduit 310 immediately upstream of the exhaust sensor 250. As shown in
It should be appreciated that turning the treated exhaust 302 around the hub 306 and/or turning the treated exhaust 302 around the flow divider beams 308 and funneling such exhaust towards the central wake area 312 may introduce turbulence into such treated exhaust 302. By introducing turbulence, the treated exhaust 302 may be more thoroughly mixed within the wake area 312 and form a more homogenously mixed turbulent exhaust flow 314 within the wake area 312. Additionally, or alternatively, turning the treated exhaust 302 around the hub 306 and/or the flow divider beams 308 and into the wake area 312 may cause any liquid contained within the treated exhaust 302 to be reduced or eliminated. For instance, the treated exhaust 302 may generally accelerate in order to be turned into the wake area 312. Accelerating the treated exhaust 302 in such a fashion generally causes substances within the treated exhaust 302, such as liquid droplets, to be shed from the treated exhaust 302. Specifically, the momentum of liquid droplets within the treated exhaust 302 may cause the liquid droplets to continue downstream and not turn into the wake area 312 with the associated treated exhaust 302. Furthermore, the turbulence generated within the wake area 312 may facilitate the primary break-up of liquid droplets contained within the treated exhaust 302 by increasing the Weber number (We) associated with the liquid droplets and also promoting the secondary break-up or atomization of the liquid droplets by reducing the characteristic atomization timescale. Such improved droplet break-up and atomization results in smaller droplet sizes within the turbulent exhaust flow 314, and the higher turbulence enhances the evaporation of the remaining droplets. Accordingly, the likelihood of liquid droplets impinging against the exhaust sensor 250 may be reduced significantly, thereby reducing the potential for sensor damage due to such liquid droplet impingements. As such, the turbulent exhaust flow 314 generated within the wake area 312 may generally be more thoroughly mixed and contain less liquid droplets as compared to the treated exhaust 302 received within the upstream end 232 of the flow conduit 210.
In the illustrated embodiment of
The sensor shield 304 may generally be supported within the flow conduit 210 by the flow divider beams 308. For example, the distal ends 310 of the flow divider beams 308 may be coupled to an interior surface 235 of the flow conduit 210 using any suitable means, such as welding, adhesives, fasteners, friction fit, or the like. For example, in one embodiment, the sensor shield 304 may be inserted within the upstream end 232 of the flow conduit 210, e.g., positioned directly upstream of the exhaust sensor 250, and retained within the flow conduit 210 via friction. In such an embodiment, the sensor shield 304 may be sized slightly larger than the interior of the flow conduit 210, and the flow divider beams 308 may be configured to deflect or bend. It should be appreciated that bending the flow divider beams 308 may generate a radially outward (relative to the centerline 307 of the sensor shield 304) spring force such that the position of the sensor shield 304 is generally fixed.
Additionally, the disclosed sensor assembly 300 may include the exhaust sensor 250 as described generally above and arranged within the flow conduit 210 downstream of the sensor shield 304. For example, the exhaust sensor 250 may be configured to allow the concentration or amount of emissions remaining within the turbulent exhaust flow 314 to be monitored. The exhaust sensor 250 may be configured to generally extend radially inwardly from the interior surface 235 of the flow conduit 210 such that at least a portion of the sensor 250 is positioned directly within and/or otherwise directly exposed to the turbulent exhaust flow 314 flowing downstream of the wake area 312. In this regard, it should be noted that the exhaust sensor 250 may be shielded or otherwise protected from the flow of treated exhaust 302 via the sensor shield 304. As such, the turbulent exhaust flow 314 containing less liquid droplet and/or more thoroughly mixed exhaust gases may flow across the exhaust sensor 250 to allow the sensor 250 to provide accurate data relating to the gaseous emission(s) being monitored. Furthermore, the controller 260 (
Referring now to
As shown, each of the flow divider beams 308 may include an upstream surface 326 and downstream edges 328. In one embodiment, the upstream surface 326 may be curved or arcuate such that each flow divider beam 308 defines a curved cross-sectional shape between its downstream edges 328. For example, each flow divider beam 308 may, in one embodiment, define a U-shaped cross-section 333. Additionally, the flow divider beams 308 may define divider flowpaths 317, 319, 321, 323 downstream of the upstream surfaces 326 and between the downstream edges 328 for funneling treated exhaust 302 towards the wake area 312 created downstream of the hub 306. For example, the divider flowpaths 317, 319, 321, 323 may extend between the distal end 310 of each flow divider beam 308 to the hub 306 for funneling portions of the treated exhaust 302 from the distal ends 310 of the beams 308 to the wake area 312. In such an embodiment, the wake area 312 may be defined by a bowl extending from the hub 306 along walls of the flow divider beams 308 to the respective downstream edges 328 of the flow divider beams 308 adjacent to the hub 306, serving as the rim of the bowl defining the wake area 312. However, the divider flowpaths 317, 319, 321, 323 may generally form voids or holes in the structure of the sensor shield 304 defining the wake area 312.
Furthermore, treated exhaust 302 flowing adjacent to the downstream edges 328 of each flow divider beam 308 may be turned into the divider flowpaths 317, 319, 321, 323 (e.g., turned exhaust represented by arrows 324) such that the turned exhaust 324 flowing along the length of the flow divider beams 308 is funneled towards the wake area 312. Additionally, each flow divider beam 308 may define a cross-sectional length between the upstream surface 326 and downstream edges 328 along the length of the flow divider beam 308. As shown, the cross-sectional length may increase from the distal end 310 of each flow divider beam 308 (e.g., a first cross-sectional length 330) to the hub 306 (e.g., a second cross-sectional length 332). As such, turned exhaust 324 proximate to the hub 306 may be required to turn to a greater degree than turned exhaust 324 proximate to the distal ends 310 of the flow divider beams 308. Turning exhaust entering the divider flowpaths 317, 319, 321, 323 closer to the hub 306 to a greater degree may introduce greater turbulence and shed a greater amount of liquid particles than the turned exhaust 324 closer to the distal ends 310 of the flow divider beams 308. Such a configuration may improve the mixing of the treated exhaust 302 within the wake area 312 and further reduce liquid particles within the turbulent exhaust flow 314.
In at least one configuration of the sensor shield 304, as shown in
In several embodiments, the sensor assembly 300 may include a sensor conduit 330 housing the exhaust sensor 250. For example, as shown in
For example, in the illustrated embodiment, an inlet 317 at the upstream end 336 of the sensor conduit 330 may be positioned within or adjacent to the wake area 312 to receive the turbulent exhaust flow 314. Additionally, the sensor conduit 330 may define an outlet 340 generally at the downstream end 339 to expel the turbulent exhaust 314 flowing through the suction flowpath 338 and past the exhaust sensor 250. Particularly, the treated exhaust 302 flowing past the outlet 340 generates the flow of the turbulent exhaust 314 through the suction flowpath 338. For example, the wake area 312 may generally correspond to a stagnation zone within the flow conduit 210 corresponding to a high pressure area. Further, the flow of the treated exhaust 302 past the outlet 340 may correspond to a low pressure area due to the velocity of such treated exhaust 302. As such, the pressure differential between the inlet 317 and the outlet 340 may generate a suction force within the sensor conduit 330 that directs the turbulent exhaust flow 314 through the suction flowpath 338 and over the exhaust sensor 250 before being expelled at the outlet 340, allowing the exhaust sensor 250 to determine the amount of emissions within the turbulent exhaust 314.
Referring now to
Additionally, it should be appreciated that, in alternative embodiments, the flow divider beams 308 of the sensor shield 304 may include any combination of the features described with reference to
Referring to the embodiment of
This written description uses examples to disclose the technology, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the technology, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the technology is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they include structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4255124 | Baranowski, Jr. | Mar 1981 | A |
5605399 | King | Feb 1997 | A |
7549511 | Marocco | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7776280 | Telford | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7941995 | Goss et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7998423 | Boorse et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8359832 | Yi et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8539761 | Lebas et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8635858 | Levin et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8695330 | Davidson et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8820050 | Dubkov et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8844270 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8966965 | Driscoll et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8999276 | Bui | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9027330 | Edholm | May 2015 | B2 |
9221016 | Van Niekerk et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9295946 | Lamps et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9302223 | Bui et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9435240 | Sampath et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9587545 | Venkataraghavan | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9598999 | De Rudder et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9707525 | De Rudder et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9737907 | Hornback et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9945278 | Wright et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10086333 | Denton et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10179315 | Brandl et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
20070245718 | Cheng | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090035194 | Robel et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090173063 | Boorse et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20120204541 | Li et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20150078976 | Bui | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160123209 | Wright | May 2016 | A1 |
20170282135 | Whitten et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102014222395 | May 2016 | DE |
2533353 | Jun 2016 | GB |
3580163 | Oct 2004 | JP |
100844750 | Jul 2008 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Praveena, V., et al. “A Review on Various After Treatment Techniques to Reduce NOx Emissions in a CI Engine,” Journal of the Energy Institute, vol. 91, Issue 5, Oct. 2018, pp. 704-720. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743967117300260. |
Jain, Mohit, et al. “Secondary Breakup of a Drop at Moderate Weber Numbers,” The Royal Society Publishing, Proc. R. Soc. A471:20170930. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/tspa.2014.0930. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210231044 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |