The invention relates to the technical field of measuring mass flow or volumetric flow under standard conditions and/or the thermal load and/or the level of harmful substances of a fluid.
Hot film anemometers are known for measuring mass flow. In this type of sensor, the gas flow is directed over a heated area of the sensor. The heated area cools down on account of the flowing gas. The value of this cooling is the initial basis for determining the mass flow.
Particles or condensates are also often conveyed by the gas and lead to deposits on the heated areas which disadvantageously produces a drift in the measured values during the period of operation.
It is an object of the invention to provide a sensor for measuring the mass flow, in which particles or condensates in the fluid do not cause drift in the measured values.
The considerations which led to the development of the present invention are based on the fact that, in a sensor which does not have areas past which the fluid and the entrained particles flow, no deposits can form in principle.
The invention is based on the principle of ram-pressure probe measurement, in which a reproducible differential pressure is produced as a function of the speed and the density of the fluid.
The static pressure, the differential pressure and the temperature need to be known in order to be able to determine the mass flow, the volumetric flow under standard conditions or the enthalpy flow of a fluid.
According to the invention, these variables are detected by individual sensors located in an integrated unit and the values detected by the individual sensors are subsequently processed in a computing unit which is likewise integrated.
The sensor unit outputs a value which already takes into account other parameters and/or physical constants to a downstream control unit. This means that part of the computing is advantageously performed in the sensor unit and the control unit is relieved.
One development of the invention provides that a further sensor is integrated, which enables an analysis of the fluid composition. This permits detection of levels of harmful substances in engine exhaust gases, for example.
The measured variables stated are needed, for example, for the optimized control of an internal combustion engine. Since the “drifting” of measured values has disadvantageous effects in particular in the case of this application, the present invention advantageously overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art.
Integrating all the sensors and the computing unit has the advantage of a compact sensor unit with a long-term stability of the measured values, which can be used at many locations and for many applications.
The sensor unit 1 has a measuring probe 2 which comes into contact with the fluid and has a housing part 3 which is located outside the fluid.
The individual sensors (not shown here) and the computing unit are located in the housing part 3.
The sensor unit 1 is provided to be attached directly to a fluid-conducting line. The measuring probe 2 can project into the fluid flow through an opening in the fluid-conducting line. A seal 5 sealing the opening is provided on the underside of the housing part 3.
The measuring probe 2 is, at least partially, in the form of a ram-pressure probe 4. The fluid has a direction of flow according to the arrow S. In a known manner, a ram-pressure area 6 causes a flow-dependent pressure differential at two measurement openings.
Another measurement opening 8 for detecting the static pressure is located at the lower end of the ram-pressure area 6. The measurement opening 8 is arranged such that the fluid flows past it in a laminar manner.
A temperature sensor 9 is also located in the measuring probe 2. The temperature sensor is arranged, close to the surface, in the measuring probe 2, which enables it to quickly detect temperature changes in the fluid. In the illustrated example, the temperature sensor 9 is located in the ram-pressure surface. This ram-pressure surface is composed of relatively little material and thus follows the temperature changes in the fluid in near real-time.
The temperature sensor 9 is preferably arranged at a location past which the fluid flows in a laminar manner. This prevents particles transported in the fluid from forming an isolating layer on the exterior of the measuring probe 2 which falsifies the temperature measurement value.
The three measured variables static pressure, dynamic differential pressure and temperature can be used to determine the mass flow of a fluid.
Advantageously, the housing of the sensor unit is to be provided with a surface which has a so-called nanostructure either completely or at least partially in the region of the measuring probe 2.
The result of this nanostructure is that particles transported in the fluid cannot deposit permanently on the surface of the measuring probe.
Here, slots 10a and 10b are provided in the measuring probe. Only one of the slots can be seen in the illustration selected. These slots are in each case located in the outer wall of the two ducts which lead to the differential-pressure sensor in the housing part. The connecting wall between the two ducts is unchanged and is used as ram-pressure surface.
The length of the slots yields a certain mean-value function if the flow rate of the fluid is different at different locations of the slot.
The integration of an additional gas analysis sensor 15 can be used to also determine the level of harmful substances or condensates in the fluid. This gas analysis sensor requires contact with the flowing fluid in principle.
Even if this gas analysis sensor 15 is subject to a drift of the measurement values, the inventive design of the other sensors can be used to advantageously ensure that not all the sensors are subject to a drift. This combination is in any case also novel.
The one computing unit 16 and the sensors for the dynamic differential pressure and the sensor for the static pressure are accommodated in the housing part 3 in a protected manner.
The temperature sensor 9 and/or the gas analysis sensor 15 are also connected to the computing unit 16. The computing unit 16 outputs a measurement value which results from the individual values of the different sensors.
The computing unit 16 is of flexible design and can be adapted to different requirements from subsequent control units.
The invention is industrially applicable in many fields where long-term stability of the measurement values if important.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2006/001219 | 7/13/2006 | WO | 00 | 6/23/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/006297 | 1/18/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3895531 | Lambert | Jul 1975 | A |
3981193 | Goulet | Sep 1976 | A |
4304137 | Mott | Dec 1981 | A |
4444060 | Yamamoto | Apr 1984 | A |
4624146 | Nakagawa | Nov 1986 | A |
4890492 | Andrejasich et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4920808 | Sommer | May 1990 | A |
5001638 | Zimmerman et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5438880 | Washburn | Aug 1995 | A |
5483839 | Meunier | Jan 1996 | A |
5597963 | Smart et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5736651 | Bowers | Apr 1998 | A |
5913250 | Wible | Jun 1999 | A |
6044716 | Yamamoto | Apr 2000 | A |
6189390 | Platt | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6237426 | Gryc et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6321166 | Evans et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6425293 | Woodroffe et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6452542 | Bachinski et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6487918 | DeAngelis | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6609825 | Ice et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6634242 | Cha et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6868741 | Harman | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6883389 | Eldridge | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7010970 | Rediniotis et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7201067 | Kurtz et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7243556 | Gryc et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7406880 | Orleskie et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7798017 | Betz | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20020124658 | Schmidt | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030101827 | Cha et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030139690 | Aebli et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145661 | Taranto | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172746 | Walker et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040173030 | Harman | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050039545 | Eldridge | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060060001 | Kurtz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070107510 | Agami et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080202256 | Betz | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080285620 | Benning et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090211372 | Betz | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090217752 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |