This invention relates to electric machines and, more particularly to sensorless switched reluctance electric machines including segmented stators.
Reluctance electric machines, such as motors and generators, typically include a stator that is mounted inside a machine housing and a rotor that is supported for rotation relative to the stator. Reluctance electric machines produce torque as a result of the rotor tending to rotate to a position that minimizes the reluctance (or maximizes the inductance) of the magnetic circuit. The reluctance is minimized (and the inductance is maximized) when the salient rotor poles are aligned with the energized salient stator poles. A drive circuit generates a set of stator winding currents that are output to the stator pole windings and that create a magnetic field. The rotor rotates in response to the magnetic field. In synchronous reluctance electric machines, the windings are energized at a controlled frequency. In switched reluctance electric machines, the drive circuit and/or transducers detect the angular position of the rotor. The drive circuit energizes the stator windings as a function of the sensed rotor position. The design and operation of switched reluctance electric machines is known in the art and is discussed in T. J. E. Miller, “Switched Reluctance Motors and Their Control”, Magna Physics Publishing and Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Conventional switched reluctance electric machines generally include a stator with a solid stator core or a laminated stator. The laminated stator includes a plurality of circular stator plates that are punched from a magnetically conducting material. The stator includes pairs of diametrically opposed stator poles that project radially inward. The rotor also includes pairs of diametrically opposed rotor poles. Windings or coils are typically disposed about the stator poles. The windings that are wound around any two diametrically opposed stator poles are connected in series or in parallel to define a machine phase or a phase coil.
By passing current through the phase coil, magnetic fields are established about the stator poles and torque is produced as the energized phase coil attracts a pair of rotor poles into alignment. The current in the phase coils is generated in a predetermined sequence to create the magnetic field that produces continuous rotating torque on the rotor. The period during which current is provided to the phase coil is known as the active stage. At a predetermined point, either as the rotor poles become aligned with the stator poles or at some point prior thereto, the current in the phase coil is commutated to prevent braking torque from acting on the rotor poles. Once the commutation point is reached, the current is switched to another phase coil. During the inactive stage, the current is allowed to dissipate from the phase coil.
In order to maintain torque on the rotor, it is important to maintain the proper relationship between the position of the rotor and the active stage of each machine phase. If the active stage is initiated and/or commutated too early or too late with respect to the position of the rotor, the torque on the rotor will vary and/or the machine will not operate at optimum efficiency.
The drive circuits of conventional switched reluctance electric machines control the current in the phase coils. The drive circuits maintain the proper relationship between the active stage of the machine phases and the position of the rotor by continuously sensing rotor position. There are two distinct approaches for detecting the angular position of the rotor. In a “sensed” approach, an external physical sensor senses the angular position of the rotor. For example, a rotor position transducer (RPT) with a hall effect sensor or an optical sensor physically senses the angular position of the rotor. In a “sensorless” approach, electronics that are associated with the drive circuit derive the angular rotor position without an external physical sensor.
There are many problems that are associated with switched reluctance electric machines that employ the sensed approach. The RPT typically includes a sensor board with one or more sensors and a shutter that is coupled to and rotates with the shaft of the rotor. The shutter includes a plurality of shutter teeth that pass through optical sensors as the rotor rotates. Because the angular rotor position is critical to proper operation, sophisticated alignment techniques are used to ensure that the sensor board of the RPT is properly positioned with respect to the housing and the stator. Misalignment of the sensor board is known to degrade the performance of the electric machine. Unfortunately, utilization of these complex alignment techniques increases the manufacturing costs for switched reluctance electric machines equipped with RPTs.
The RPTs also increase the overall size of the switched reluctance electric machine, which can adversely impact machine and product packaging requirements. The costs of the RPTs often place switched reluctance electric machines at a competitive disadvantage in applications that are suitable for open loop induction motors that do not require RPTs. Another drawback with RPTs involves field servicing of the switched reluctance electric machines. Specifically, wear elements, such as the bearings, that are located within the enclosed rotor housing may need to be repaired or replaced. To reach the wear elements, an end shield must be removed from the housing. Because alignment of the sensor board is critical, replacement of the end shield often requires the use of complex realignment techniques. When the alignment techniques are improperly performed by the service technician, the sensor board is misaligned and the motor's performance is adversely impacted.
Various methods for dispensing with the RPT have been proposed. Several of these are reviewed in “Sensorless Methods for Determining the Rotor Position of Switched Reluctance Motors” by W F Ray and I H Al-Bahadly, published in the Proceedings of The European Power Electronics Conference, Brighton, UK, 13-16 September 1993. Vol. 6, pp 7-13, hereby incorporated by reference. Many of these methods proposed for the rotor position estimation use the measurement of phase flux-linkage (i.e. the integral of applied voltage with respect to time) and current in one or more phases. Position is calculated using knowledge of the variation in inductance of the machine as a function of angle and current. The storage of this data involves the use of a large memory array and/or additional system overheads for interpolation of data between stored points.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,777,416 to Kolomeitsev, U.S. Pat. No. 6,011,368 to Kalpathi et al, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,107,772 to Liu et al., which are incorporated by reference, a drive circuit measures the rise time of current in a stator winding between two predetermined current levels. The drive circuit calculates the inductance of the phase coil from the current rise time. The drive circuit estimates the angular position of the rotor from the inductance of the phase coil. The drive circuit adjusts the active stage of the phase coil based on the rotor position. U.S. Pat. No. 5,982,117 to Taylor et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,883,485 to Mehlhorn, which are incorporated by reference, likewise monitor current in unenergized windings to determine the inductance of the phase coil and the position of the rotor. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,772,839 to MacMinn, which is incorporated by reference, a drive circuit simultaneously measures changes in the current in two unexcited phases. The drive circuit derives rotor position estimates for each phase and combines the rotor position estimates into a combined rotor position estimate.
Some methods make use of this data at low speeds where “chopping” current control is the dominant control strategy for varying the developed torque. These methods usually employ diagnostic energization pulses in non torque-productive phases (i.e. those phases which are not energized directly from the power supply at a particular moment). A method suited to low-speed operation is proposed by N M Mvungi and J M Stephenson in “Accurate Sensorless Rotor Position Detection in a S R Motor”, published in Proceedings of the European Power Electronics Conference, Firenze, Italy, 1991, Vol. 1, pp 390-393, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,596 to MacMinn, et al., which is incorporated by reference, a drive circuit employs a phase inductance sensing technique to indirectly estimate rotor position. Voltage sensing pulses are output to an unexcited phase. The voltage sensing pulses cause a change in phase current that is inversely proportional to the instantaneous phase inductance. Commutation time is determined by comparing the change in phase current to a threshold current. U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,518 to Vitunic which is incorporated by reference, also discloses a drive circuit that employs diagnostic pulses.
Other methods employ the “single-pulse” mode of energization at higher speeds. The current and inductance waveforms, over a phase inductance period, are mirror images of the monitoring waveforms. These methods monitor the operating voltages and currents of an active phase without interfering with normal operation. A typical higher speed method is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,173,650 to Hedlund, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Both the chopping and single-pulse modes described above are normally used when the converter applies a fixed value of supply voltage to the phase windings. A further control strategy is the pulse width modulated (PWM) mode, where one or more switches are switched rapidly to effectively produce a supply voltage that is proportional to the duty cycle of the PWM waveform. This allows the use of single-pulse current waveforms at much lower speeds than would be possible on the full supply voltage. The current waveform is made up of a large number of segments, corresponding to the current carried by the switches and diodes respectfully.
Having to store a two-dimensional array of machine data in order to operate without a position sensor is an obvious disadvantage. Alternative methods have been proposed, which avoid the need for the majority of angularly referenced information and instead store data at one angle only. One such method described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,467,025 to Ray which is hereby incorporated by reference. This method senses the phase flux-linkage and current at a predefined angle by adjusting the diagnostic point via the calculated deviation away from a desired point. Two one-dimensional tables are stored in the preferred embodiment, one of flux-linkage versus current at a referenced rotor angle and another of the differential of flux-linkage with respect to rotor angle versus current. By monitoring phase voltage and current, the deviation away from a predicted angle can be assessed, with the aid of the look-up tables, and system operation can be adjusted accordingly. However, such methods, although reducing the amount of information which has to be stored, still have to detect or compute the flux-linkage at a specific rotor angle and may be sensitive to repeatability or manufacturing tolerances in the machine.
A similar approach is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,793,179 to Watkins, hereby incorporated by reference, where the arrival of the rotor at the peak of the inductance profile is predicted and the system is then put into a freewheeling mode, during which the gradient of the current is measured. While this method works well in the absence of noise, it is not robust enough to disregard false readings produced by noise. Though the current waveform may be relatively immune to induced noise, a drive that uses a PWM voltage supply generates a noisy current waveform. The method disclosed by Watkins '179 also must be used with a converter circuit that is capable of freewheeling.
Other attempts to overcome these deficiencies are described in “A New Rotor Position Estimation Method for Switched Reluctance Motors using PWM Voltage Control”, by Gallegos-Lopez, G. Kjaer, P C & Miller, T J E, in Proc EPE'97, 7th European Conf on Power Electronics and Applications, 8-10 Sep. 1997, Trondheim, Norway, Vol. 3, pp 580-585, hereby incorporated by reference. This method continuously samples the current waveform and attempts to detect the change in gradient that is produced by the start of pole overlap and the consequent sudden rise in inductance of the phase. The basic method described by Gallegos-Lopez et al involves detecting the point of pole overlap for monitoring (or pole separation for generating) by detecting the point where the rate of change of the current waveform, with respect to time, is zero. The detector includes a differentiator, a comparator and a single shot multivibrator. The differentiator differentiates the current signal so that at the point of zero di/dt the differentiator output is zero. The comparator detects this zero output and flips state. The system does not require either stored magnetization data or an interval of freewheeling. The system does current feedback and does not work reliably in the presence of noise. Improvements to this system include sampling and storage of over several intervals and interpolation to reduce the effects of false detection caused by noise.
When sensing the angular rotor position using the sensorless approach, variations in the electrical characteristics of the individual stator pole windings can adversely impact the ability of the sensorless drive circuits to correctly derive the angular position of the rotor. Most of the sensorless approaches measure the resistance and/or inductance of the windings. If the resistance and/or inductance varies from one stator winding to another, the sensorless drive circuit may incorrectly derive the angular position of the rotor. This problem is made worse if the windings on the stator poles creep or move over time. When this occurs, the cross section of the stator windings changes, which changes the inductance and resistance of the stator pole winding.
There are several conventional methods for placing the winding wire on the stator of a switched reluctance electric machine. The winding wire can be initially wound and transferred onto the stator poles. Transfer winding tends to leave excess winding wire or loops around axial ends of the stator poles. Transfer winding can typically utilize approximately 60-65% of available stator slot area. Needle winding employs a needle that winds the wire directly on the stator poles. The needle, however, takes up some of the stator slot area, which reduces slot fill to approximately 50%. The positioning of winding wire on the stator poles using these methods varies from one stator pole to the next. Winding creep and other assembly variations also impact the inductance and resistance of the winding wire over time, which makes it difficult to accurately perform “sensorless” control due to the non-conformity of the salient stator poles.
While the design of switched reluctance electric machines is relatively mature, there are several areas requiring improvement. Specifically, it is desirable to improve the uniformity of the electrical characteristics of the stator of switched reluctance electric machines. It is also desirable to eliminate the need for RPTs in switched reluctance electric machines to decrease the cost and to improve both durability and serviceability.
A sensorless switched reluctance electric machine according to the invention includes a rotor and a segmented stator having a plurality of stator segment assemblies. The stator segment assemblies define salient stator poles and inter-polar stator slots. Each of the stator segment assemblies includes a stator segment core and winding wire that is wound around the stator segment core. The rotor defines a plurality of rotor poles. The rotor tends to rotate relative to the stator to a rotational position that maximizes the inductance of an energized winding. A sensorless drive circuit derives rotor position and energizes the winding wire around the stator segment assemblies based on the derived position of the rotor.
According to other features of the invention, the stator segment core includes a plurality of stator plates. Each stator plate has an outer rim section and a tooth-shaped pole section. The stator segment assemblies include an end cap assembly that includes a pair of end caps that are secured to opposite ends of the stator segment core. A pair of retainer plates connect the end caps on opposite sides of the stator segment core. The end cap assembly defines an annular retention channel within which the winding wire is wound. The retention channel facilitates improved precision in the winding process and tends to reduce winding creep during use.
By providing a segmented stator with the end cap assembly in the switched reluctance electric machine, the present invention improves the torque density of the switched reluctance electric machine. As a result, the torque output of the switched reluctance electric machine can be increased and/or the dimensions of the switched reluctance electric machine can be reduced for a given torque output. In addition, the stator segment assemblies can be manufactured with a greater electrical uniformity. The inductance and resistance of the individual stator segments and the stator are also more uniform. Sensorless techniques can be used more effectively when the inductance and resistance characteristics of the stator are more uniform. Sensorless rotor position sensing techniques lower the manufacturing costs of the switched reluctance electric machine when compared to sensed rotor position techniques and improve reliability and serviceability in the field.
Other objects, features and advantages will be apparent from the specification, the claims and the drawings.
The following detailed description provides preferred exemplary embodiments only and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability or configuration of the present invention. Rather, the detailed description of the preferred exemplary embodiments will provide those skilled in the art with an enabling description for implementing the preferred exemplary embodiments of the present invention. It will be understood that various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of the elements without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
The stator of the switched reluctance electric machine according to the present invention has highly uniform electrical characteristics. The segmented stator and the end cap assembly according to the invention allow more precise winding of the stator poles and retention of the windings during use. As a result of the more uniform electrical characteristics, sensorless measurement techniques for deriving rotor position can be employed more successfully. The sensorless switched reluctance machine can be manufactured at a lower cost with improved reliability and serviceability.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The inductance measuring circuit 30 measures the inductance of one or more unenergized phase coils. The rotor position determining circuit 32 derives the angular position of the rotor based on the inductance measurement and outputs a rotor position signal to the commuting circuit 34. The commutating circuit 34 calculates the optimum commutation angle to deenergize one or more coils and to energize one or more other phase coils based in part on the derived rotor position signal.
Referring now to
As can be appreciated by skilled artisans, other sensorless drive circuits may be employed. For example, the specific sensorless drive circuits set forth in the U.S. Patents that are identified above may be employed. The switched reluctance electric machine, that is set forth in more detail below, is particularly suitable for sensorless operation due to its uniform electrical characteristics.
Referring now to the remaining drawings, the sensorless switched reluctance machine 12 is shown to include a housing 112, a segmented stator 114 mounted in the housing 112, and a rotor 116 supported for rotation relative to the segmented stator 114. In accordance with the present invention, the segmented stator 114 includes a plurality of stator segment assemblies 118 that can be individually assembled and subsequently combined with additional stator segment assemblies to provide the segmented stator 114. As will be detailed, each stator segment assembly 118 includes a stator segment core 120, an end cap assembly 122, and winding wire 124 that is wound around the stator segment core 120 and the end cap assembly 122. The end cap assembly 122 insulates the ends of the stator segment core 120 and provides retention for additional turns of the winding wire 124.
Referring primarily to
As previously mentioned, the stator segment core 120 is defined by a plurality of stator plates 126 that are stacked together. The stator plates 126 are die cut from thin sheets of magnetically conductive material. During the die cutting operation, a first pair of slits 150 are cut into the outer rim section 120 and a second pair of slits 152 are cut into the pole section 130 and central portions between the slits are deformed. The slits 150 are transverse in alignment relative to the slits 152. The stator plates 126 that form the stator segment core 120 are stacked and press fit. As can be seen in
The rotor 116 is shown to include a circular rim section 154 and a plurality of tooth-shaped pole sections 156 that project radially from the rim section 154. A circular bore 158 is formed in the rotor 116 and may include keyways 160. A rotor shaft (not shown) is received by the circular bore 158 of the rotor 116. In the particular embodiment shown, the rotor 116 has eight equally-spaced rotor pole sections 156 and the segmented stator 114 has twelve equally-spaced pole sections 130. Other rotor pole and stator pole combinations are also contemplated. In addition, each rotor pole section 156 has an arcuate outer edge surface 162 that defines an air gap 163 with respect to the arcuate inner edge surface 144 on the pole sections 130 of the stator segment core 120.
Referring to
The tooth width W1 determines the magnetic flux density in the stator tooth and how much area is available for winding wire in the inter-polar stator slot. The designer of the switched reluctance electric machine can select the tooth width W1 so that it is sufficient to accommodate the maximum anticipated magnetic flux in the stator poles, but is not wider than necessary. By optimizing the tooth width W1, the slot area is increased, which allows additional winding wire. By increasing the current carrying capacity of the windings without causing overheating, the torque density of the switched reluctance electric machine can be improved. The design of the stator plates also depends on other factors such as the type of steel that is selected, the axial length of the stator stack, the operating speed, the overall size of the motor, and the desired magnetic flux density in the stator teeth.
Referring to
Terminals 170 and 172 are shown in
Referring to
To more clearly illustrate the structure of the end cap assembly 122,
Referring now to
As can be appreciated from the foregoing, the sensorless switched reluctance machine according to the invention has improved torque density due to the segmented stator and the precisely wound stator segment assemblies. The stator segment assemblies in the electric machine can be produced with a greater electrical uniformity and with lower variations in inductance and resistance. As a result, sensorless rotor position sensing techniques can be employed more effectively, which dramatically lowers the manufacturing costs and improves reliability and serviceability in the field. Because the manufacturing tolerances of the stator segments have been improved, less costly sensorless drive circuits can be employed and/or more accurate control can be achieved. In addition, the end cap assemblies according to the invention prevent winding creep and further help improve the electrical uniformity of the stator segment assemblies during use.
Those skilled in the art can now appreciate from the foregoing description that the broad teachings of the present invention can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this invention has been described in connection with particular examples thereof, the true scope of the invention should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent to the skilled practitioner upon a study of the drawings, the specification and the following claims.
This application relates to U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/803,876, filed Mar. 12, 2001; Ser. No. 09/754,537, filed Jan. 1, 2001; 09/761,125, filed Jan. 16, 2001; Ser. No. 09/824,980, filed Apr. 3, 2001; Ser. No. 09/817,560, filed Mar. 26, 2001; Ser. No. 09/817,687, filed Mar. 26, 2001; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,487,769, issued Dec. 3, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1756672 | Barr | Apr 1930 | A |
2688103 | Sheldon | Aug 1954 | A |
2894157 | Morrill | Jul 1959 | A |
3604222 | Sandkrug et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3914859 | Pierson | Oct 1975 | A |
3979821 | Noodleman | Sep 1976 | A |
3987324 | Linkous | Oct 1976 | A |
4130770 | Wrobel | Dec 1978 | A |
4149309 | Mitsui | Apr 1979 | A |
4340829 | McCoy | Jul 1982 | A |
4350914 | Searle | Sep 1982 | A |
4418307 | Hoffmann et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4584495 | Kordik | Apr 1986 | A |
4635349 | Rabe | Jan 1987 | A |
4698542 | Muller | Oct 1987 | A |
4772839 | MacMinn et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4812695 | Parshall | Mar 1989 | A |
4819460 | Obradovic | Apr 1989 | A |
4845837 | Lloyd | Jul 1989 | A |
4883982 | Forbes et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4896089 | Kliman et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4922165 | Crawford et al. | May 1990 | A |
4950932 | Harms et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4953284 | Hammer et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4959596 | MacMinn et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4998052 | Erdman et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5034642 | Hoemann et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5076076 | Payne | Dec 1991 | A |
5161393 | Payne et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5173650 | Hedlund et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5194775 | Cooper | Mar 1993 | A |
5212419 | Fisher et al. | May 1993 | A |
5252902 | Uehara et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5256926 | Hagenlocher et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5257828 | Miller et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5301523 | Payne et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5325677 | Payne et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5327053 | Mann et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5410235 | Ehsani | Apr 1995 | A |
5457375 | Marcinkiewicz et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467025 | Ray | Nov 1995 | A |
5491859 | Richardson | Feb 1996 | A |
5563463 | Stark | Oct 1996 | A |
5578880 | Lyons et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5583387 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589751 | Lim | Dec 1996 | A |
5672925 | Lipo et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5691591 | McCann | Nov 1997 | A |
5701064 | Horst et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5720065 | Myers et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5729072 | Hirano et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740880 | Miller | Apr 1998 | A |
5743721 | Graham et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5763978 | Uchida et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5777416 | Kolomeitsev | Jul 1998 | A |
5783916 | Blackburn | Jul 1998 | A |
5786651 | Suzuki | Jul 1998 | A |
5793179 | Watkins | Aug 1998 | A |
5806169 | Trago et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5811905 | Tang | Sep 1998 | A |
5821661 | Wissmach et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5859518 | Vitinic | Jan 1999 | A |
5877568 | Maes et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883485 | Mehlhorn | Mar 1999 | A |
5923141 | McHugh | Jul 1999 | A |
5929590 | Tang | Jul 1999 | A |
5949211 | McCann | Sep 1999 | A |
5955861 | Jeong et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5979195 | Bestell et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982117 | Taylor et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990592 | Miura et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994804 | Grennan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996379 | Skrippek | Dec 1999 | A |
6011368 | Kalpathi et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020661 | Trago et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6040647 | Brown et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041625 | Nagai et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049153 | Nishiyama et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6066905 | Wright et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081083 | Nashiki | Jun 2000 | A |
6087755 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092619 | Nishikawa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6102151 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104113 | Beifus | Aug 2000 | A |
6107772 | Liu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122579 | Collier-Hallman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127753 | Yamazaki et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144131 | Hollenbeck et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6166468 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6177751 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188196 | Koide et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194805 | Heese et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194806 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204579 | Arpino | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211587 | Enomoto et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218753 | Asano et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219900 | Suzuki | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226856 | Kazama et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239530 | Garcia | May 2001 | B1 |
6252325 | Nashiki | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266591 | Wilson-Jones et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6300700 | Nishiyama et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6329782 | Chen et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6359412 | Heglund | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369481 | Bahn | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369687 | Akita et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373211 | Henry et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384564 | Pollock | May 2002 | B1 |
6389678 | Ackermann et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411006 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6487769 | Ketterer et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
20010010452 | Moriarty | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010030517 | Batzel | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020089251 | Tajima et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2937838 | Jul 1980 | DE |
0350429 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0823711 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0778660 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0868010 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0871282 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0967135 | Dec 1999 | EP |
2719324 | Nov 1995 | FR |
1200279 | Jul 1970 | GB |
61030938 | Feb 1986 | JP |
404049826 | Feb 1992 | JP |
05-038086 | Feb 1993 | JP |
08-033292 | Feb 1996 | JP |
09084282 | Mar 1997 | JP |
09-233742 | Sep 1997 | JP |
09-322439 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-174319 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-210721 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-271718 | Oct 1998 | JP |
11-018331 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11-089129 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-191987 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11-275830 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11-289701 | Oct 1999 | JP |
H11-289701 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11-289726 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11-289727 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11-289728 | Oct 1999 | JP |
411289701 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11-332138 | Nov 1999 | JP |
11-341717 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000-014057 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000-37050 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-139052 | May 2000 | JP |
2000-224790 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-312451 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2000-333388 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-008395 | Jan 2001 | JP |
WO 0037731 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0079670 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0195459 | Dec 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020135254 A1 | Sep 2002 | US |