Sensors for monitoring oral appliances

Description

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

FIELD

Described herein are oral appliances having one or more sensors, and methods of using them.

BACKGROUND

Orthodontic procedures typically involve repositioning a patient's teeth to a desired arrangement in order to correct malocclusions and/or improve aesthetics. To achieve these objectives, orthodontic appliances such as braces, shell aligners, and the like can be applied to the patient's teeth by an orthodontic practitioner. The appliance can be configured to exert force on one or more teeth in order to effect desired tooth movements according to a treatment plan.

During orthodontic treatment with patient-removable appliances, the appliance may not function correctly due to a defect, or may develop a defect during use. In some instances, the appliance may be improperly installed, formed, or operated by the practitioner. There is a need for methods and apparatuses that allow monitoring of a state of the intraoral appliances. Described herein are methods and apparatuses for performing such monitoring.

SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

Described herein are apparatuses, including devices and systems, including in particular orthodontic appliances (e.g., oral appliances) and methods for monitoring an orthodontic appliance, including, but not limited to monitoring a parameter or state of the orthodontic appliance.

In particular, described herein are oral appliances that are configured to determine that they are properly worn and/or are properly functioning when worn in the user's oral cavity. Applicants note that these apparatuses (e.g., devices and systems, which may include orthodontic aligners, mandibular repositioning apparatuses, arch expanders/palatal expanders, etc.) may function as compliance monitors, including that a patient is wearing the apparatus and/or complying with an orthodontic treatment, but are not limited to compliance monitoring. In particular, these apparatuses may monitor how well the device is contacting the patient's oral cavity, including teeth, gingiva, palate, etc. Alternatively or additionally, these apparatuses may be configured to detect and/or monitor wear and/or damage to the apparatus. The apparatus may include one or more sensors (wherein a sensor may comprise a sensor receiving and/or a sensor emitter and sensor receiver pair) providing data to a processor; the processor may analyze, including in real time, how well the apparatus is being worn, wear on the apparatus, damage to the apparatus, or the like. The processor may be part of the oral appliance worn by the patient or it may be in communication (wired or wireless communication, including real-time or near real-time communication) with the oral appliance. Thus, any of the apparatuses and methods described herein may determine and may signal or otherwise indicate how well the apparatus is operating.

Monitoring may alternatively or additionally include monitoring status of the appliance, monitoring wear of the appliance, monitoring the geographic/spatial location of the appliance, etc. In some embodiments, an orthodontic appliance includes one or more sensors configured to obtain sensor data; these sensors may include those that are indicative of a state of the appliance. As used herein, the state of the appliance may include, for example, how well the appliance is fitting the patient when worn, if the appliance has developed any damage or wear, if the appliance is defective, etc. The appliance can include one or more processors operably coupled to the sensor(s) and configured to process the sensor data so as to indicate a state of the appliance, thus enabling electronic monitoring of the appliance before and/or during a prescribed course of orthodontic treatment. Advantageously, the apparatuses (e.g., devices, systems, etc.) and methods described herein may improve treatment efficacy, as well as provide data useful to the practitioner for designing and monitoring orthodontic treatments.

For example, any of the apparatuses described herein may be configured to include one or more tooth-contacting region(s). A device for monitoring the status of an intraoral appliance may include an appliance shell comprising a plurality of teeth receiving regions (e.g., cavities) and one or more sensors operably coupled to the appliance shell and configured to generate sensor data indicative of a state of the appliance (e.g., where an how well the appliance is contacting the teeth, such as the presence of any gaps between the appliance and the teeth, buckling of the appliance, defects such as tears, cracks, etc. in the appliance, and/or operating outside of a predetermined range of parameter values), and a processor operably coupled to the one or more sensors and configured to process the sensor data so as to determine and/or indicate the state of the appliance. Sensors may be configured, for example, to determine the quality of fit of the appliance by measuring contact (pressure, location, etc.) between the appliance and the oral cavity (e.g., teeth, gingiva, palate, etc.). For example, sensors may include one or more capacitive or other electrical sensors within or on the appliance that indicate contact between the appliance and the user's teeth. Signals from such contact sensors may be received (continuously and/or periodically) to determine when contact is being made with which parts of the patient's teeth and the appliance. The processor may be configured to analyze the sensed data from one or more such sensors to determine that appropriate contact (e.g., of all or a predefined sub-set of sensors in/on the appliance) with the apparatus. A poorly-fitting appliance may not make full contact with all of the sensors, or may make contact with a subset of sensors indicating poor contact. The processor may also be configured to examine the intensity of the contact and may indicate that the level of the signal (indicating contact/non-contact) is outside of a range or threshold indicating good contact. The processor may record and/or transmit this information. In some variations this information may be logged for later use by the dental professional and/or may be used to alert the patient (e.g., via display on a smartphone, tablet, etc., and/or via SMS, text message, or the like) that the appliance should be adjusted.

Thus, the apparatuses and methods described herein may be configured to detect (“smart detection”) engagement of positioning features of a mandibular repositioning device, determine an expansion rate of a palatal expander, or identify a defect in an intraoral appliance. For example, as will be described in greater detail herein, any of the apparatuses described herein may be configured with one or more sensors that detect interaction between different portion of an oral appliance and/or between different oral appliances or components of an oral appliance. For example, mandibular repositioning devices may include contact regions that engage a first oral appliance (e.g., a low arch appliance) and a second oral appliance (e.g., an upper arch appliance). The apparatuses described herein may detect and determine interaction between the first and second oral appliances. For example such apparatuses may monitor the bite interaction (e.g., intercuspation) between the upper and lower dental arch. Sensors on either or both occlusal surface of the appliance may detect interaction with the opposite dental appliance, or in some variations, the teeth on the opposite arch.

As mentioned, the methods and apparatuses described herein may generally be used with or as part of any monitoring devices for monitoring an orthodontic appliance. Monitoring may be continuous (e.g., always on) or sampled at a regular frequency (e.g., between 0.001 Hz and 1 KHz, between 1 and 120 times/hour, between 1 and 24 time/day, etc.) or sampled for a discrete time after inserting the apparatus. For example, described herein are apparatuses that may be configured to record sensor data from appliances such as orthodontic aligners.

For example, in any of these apparatuses, the data may be stored in physical memory on the monitoring apparatus and may be retrieved by another device in communication with the monitoring apparatus. Retrieval may be done wirelessly, e.g., using near-field communication (NFC) and/or Bluetooth (BLE) technologies to use a smartphone or other hand-held device to retrieve the data. Specifically described herein are orthodontic devices using them that include one or more sensors (e.g., temperature sensor(s), capacitive sensor(s), pressure sensor(s), etc.), one or more processors (e.g., a CPU, etc.), a communication module (e.g., a NFC communication module), an antenna, and a power source (e.g., battery, etc.). A case or holder may be used to boost and/or relay the signals from the small monitoring apparatus to a handheld device such as a smartphone.

In some examples, an orthodontic apparatus including (or configured as) an intraoral appliance may generally be configured to monitor a state of an intraoral appliance, and may include a housing enclosing a power source and monitoring circuitry, the monitoring circuitry comprising a processor, a memory, and one or more sensors, and an elastomeric overmold encapsulating the housing. In general, any of the orthodontic devices described herein may be sized to fit against or over one tooth. Thus, the sensor(s) and any associated electronics (memory, processor, power supplies, etc.) may be compact and configured so as not to intrude into the patient's oral cavity substantially. For example a housing enclosing a part of the sensor(s) or affiliated electronics may have a maximum diameter of 2 cm or less, 1.5 cm or less, 1.0 cm or less, 0.9 cm or less, 0.8 cm or less, 0.7 cm or less, 0.6 cm or less, etc.). The monitoring apparatus housing may generally be thin (e.g., 1.0 cm or less, 0.9 cm or less, 0.8 cm or less, 0.7 cm or less, 0.6 cm or less, 0.5 cm or less, 0.4 cm or less, etc.). In any of these apparatuses, the monitoring circuitry may be configured for a wired connection, e.g., may include a plurality of data electrodes external to the housing.

Although the apparatuses and methods described herein include numerous examples of near field communication (NFC), including NFC-to-NFC communication, any of the methods and apparatuses described herein may be used with other types of wireless communication modes, including, without limitation, Wi-Fi, radio (RF, UHF, etc.), infrared (IR), microwave, Bluetooth (including Bluetooth low energy or BLE), magnetic field induction (including NFC), Wimax, Zigbee, ultrasound, etc. In particular, the methods and apparatuses described herein may include apparatuses that convert between these different wireless modes.

For example, described herein are orthodontic appliance systems including sensors (e.g., pairs of sensor emitters and sensor receivers) that detect relative position and/or orientation between the sensor emitter and sensor receiver. The sensor emitters and sensor receivers can be used to determine a state of the orthodontic appliance (such as a deformation of the orthodontic appliance, defects in the orthodontic appliance, etc.) and/or use, e.g., compliance, of the orthodontic appliance. These orthodontic appliance systems may also be used to track the effectiveness of the appliance, including tracking tooth and/or palatal movement.

For example, described herein are orthodontic appliance systems comprising: a first orthodontic appliance shaped to receive the patient's teeth; a sensor receiver disposed on or in the first appliance, wherein the sensor receiver is configured to detect a signal from a sensor emitter on another portion of the first appliance or on a second orthodontic appliance worn by the subject; and at least one processor configured to receive sensor data from the sensor receiver and to determine a relative position, orientation or position and orientation between the sensor receiver and the sensor emitter.

For example, an orthodontic appliance system may include: an orthodontic appliance shaped to receive the patient's teeth; a sensor emitter disposed on or in the appliance at a first location; a sensor receiver disposed on or in the appliance at a second location, wherein the sensor receiver is configured to detect a signal from the sensor emitter; and at least one processor configured to receive sensor data from the sensor receiver and to determine a relative position, orientation or position and orientation between the sensor receiver and the sensor emitter.

In any of these apparatuses, the sensor receiver and sensor emitter may be configured to emit and detect electromagnetic energy (e.g., current, voltage, electrical field, magnetic field, etc.) and/or optical energy (e.g., light). For example, the sensor receiver may be one or more of: an optical sensor, an electromagnetic sensor, a capacitive sensor, or a magnetic sensor. The sensor emitter may be configured to emit electromagnetic energy and/or optical energy for detection by the sensor receiver. In some variations the same sensor may be configured as both a sensor receiver and a sensor emitter. For example, a sensor emitter may be an electrode configured to receive and/or emit electrical energy (e.g., for detection of voltage, current, capacitance, etc.).

As mentioned, any of these systems may include at least one processor that may be disposed on or within the orthodontic appliance; alternatively the processor(s) may be located remotely. For example, the one processors may be coupled via an electrical trace on or in the first orthodontic appliance and/or may wirelessly communicate with the sensor receiver(s).

The first and second orthodontic appliances may be removable. For example, the orthodontic appliance may comprise a polymeric shell having a plurality of teeth-receiving cavities.

Any of these systems may include a second orthodontic appliance; the sensor emitter may be on or in the second orthodontic appliance. Alternatively, the sensor emitter may be on the same (e.g., first) orthodontic appliance as the sensor receiver.

In some variations the system is configured to monitoring mandibular repositioning. For example, the first orthodontic appliance may comprises a first mandibular repositioning feature and the second orthodontic appliance may comprise a second mandibular repositioning feature; the processor may be configured to determine the relative position, orientation or position and orientation between the first and second mandibular repositioning features.

Any of these systems may include a wireless communication electronics disposed on or within the first orthodontic appliance, the wireless communication electronics being configured to transfer the sensor data to the at least one processor.

Any of these systems may include a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium configured to store the sensor data.

The at least one processor may be configured to indicate that the orthodontic appliance is one or more of: deformed, has a defect, is in close proximity to the sensor receiver, and/or that the orthodontic appliance is applying a force to the patient's teeth. For example, the processor may be configured to detect, based on the signal received, changes in the relative positions and/or orientations of the sensor receiver and sensor emitter; these changes may be monitored over time. In some variations the one or more processor monitors the rate of change of the relative positions of the sensor emitter and sensor receiver.

The processor may convert signals from the sensor emitter/sensor receiver pairs (e.g., the sensor receiver) into distances and/or intensities. For example, in some variations the processor includes a memory storing one or more look-up tables for converting sensor values into distances.

In general, the orthodontic appliance may be, for example, a palatal expander, a dental aligner, etc.

Also described herein are methods of monitoring an orthodontic appliance using any of the apparatuses described herein. For example, a method of monitoring an orthodontic appliance may include: positioning a first orthodontic appliance in the patient's mouth, so that the first orthodontic appliance receives at least some of the patient's teeth; emitting a signal from sensor emitter within the patient's mouth; receiving the signal with a sensor receiver on or in the first orthodontic appliance; transmitting the signal to at least one processor; determining a relative position, orientation or position and orientation between the sensor receiver and the sensor emitter; and outputting an indicator related to the relative position orientation or position and orientation between the sensor receiver and the sensor emitter.

For example, a method for monitoring an orthodontic appliance may include: positioning a first orthodontic appliance in the patient's mouth, so that the first orthodontic appliance receives at least some of the patient's teeth; positioning a second orthodontic appliance in the patient's mouth, wherein the second orthodontic appliance receives at least some of the patient's teeth; emitting a signal from sensor emitter on or in the second orthodontic appliance; receiving the signal with a sensor receiver on or in the first orthodontic appliance; transmitting the signal to at least one processor; determining, in the processor, a relative position, orientation or position and orientation between the sensor receiver and the sensor emitter; and outputting, from the processor, the relative position orientation or position and orientation between the sensor receiver and the sensor emitter.

Positioning the first orthodontic appliance may comprise positioning the first orthodontic appliance wherein the sensor receiver is on or in a first mandibular repositioning feature.

Emitting the signal from a sensor emitter may comprise emitting an electromagnetic signal or an optical signal. For example, an electromagnetic signal may comprise one or more of: an electrical signal, a magnetic signal, an electric current.

Any of these methods may also include positioning a second orthodontic appliance in the patient's mouth, wherein the sensor emitter is on or in the second orthodontic appliance.

Emitting the signal may comprise emitting the signal from the sensor emitter, further wherein the sensor emitter is on or in the first orthodontic appliance. Transmitting the signal may comprise wireless transmitting the signal.

Determining a relative position, orientation or position and orientation between the sensor receiver and the sensor emitter may comprise indicating that the orthodontic appliance is deformed, further wherein outputting the indicator related to the relative position orientation or position and orientation may comprise outputting that the orthodontic appliance is deformed. Determining a relative position, orientation or position and orientation between the sensor receiver and the sensor emitter may comprise indicating that the orthodontic appliance has a defect, further wherein outputting the indicator related to the relative position orientation or position and orientation may comprise outputting that the orthodontic appliance has a defect. Determining a relative position, orientation or position and orientation between the sensor receiver and the sensor emitter may comprise indicating that the sensor receiver is in close proximity to the sensor emitter, further wherein outputting the indicator related to the relative position orientation or position and orientation may comprise outputting that the proximity between the sensor receiver and sensor emitter. In some variations, determining a relative position, orientation or position and orientation between the sensor receiver and the sensor emitter comprises indicating that the orthodontic appliance is applying a force to the patient's teeth, further wherein outputting the indicator related to the relative position orientation or position and orientation comprises outputting that the orthodontic appliance is applying a force to the patient's teeth or outputting the applied force.

An indicator related to the relative position, orientation or position and orientation between the sensor receiver and sensor emitter may include a numeric indicator (e.g., positional value, coordinates, rate of change over time, etc.) with or without units, and/or an indicator that the position and/or orientation between the sensor emitter and sensor receiver (or a portion of the first and/or second orthodontic appliance(s) to which they are connected) has not changed, has changed, has changed within a range or degree, etc.

Also described herein are methods, systems and apparatuses that indicate one or more states of an orthodontic appliance. For example, described herein are orthodontic devices, comprising: an intraoral appliance shaped to receive the patient's teeth; a first sensor disposed on or in the intraoral appliance; a second sensor disposed on or in the intraoral appliance; and at least one processor configured to receive sensor data from the first and second sensors and to indicate of a state of the orthodontic device based on the sensor data. The first and second sensors comprise one or more of: a capacitive sensor, a magnetic sensor, a force sensor, a pressure sensor, and an optical sensor.

The at least one processor may be disposed on or within the intraoral appliance, as described above. The at least one processor may be disposed on or within an electronic device remote from the orthodontic device. For example, the deices may include a wireless communication electronics disposed on or within the first intraoral appliance or the second intraoral appliance, the wireless communication electronics being configured to transfer sensor data from the first and second sensors to the at least one processor.

The intraoral appliance may comprise a polymeric shell having a plurality of teeth-receiving cavities. The devices may include a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium configured to store sensor data from the first and second sensors. The at least one processor may be configured to indicate that the orthodontic device is deformed. The at least one processor may be configured to indicate that the orthodontic device has a defect.

The at least one processor may be configured to indicate that the first sensor is in close proximity to the second sensor. The at least one processor is configured to indicate that the orthodontic device is applying a force to the patient's teeth. The at least one processor may be configured to indicate a position of the first sensor relative to a position of the second sensor.

Also described herein are methods for monitoring an orthodontic device. For example, a method may include: positioning an intraoral appliance in the patient's intraoral cavity, the intraoral appliance shaped to receive the patient's teeth and comprising a plurality of sensors each positioned on or in a different part of the intraoral appliance; receiving a sensed parameter from each of the plurality of sensors; and determining a state of the orthodontic device based on the sensed parameters. The sensed parameter may include one or more of: a capacitance, a magnetic field, a force measurement, a voltage, and an impedance. The determining step may comprise determining if a first portion of the intraoral appliance is aligned properly with respect to a second portion of the intraoral appliance. The determining step may comprise determining if the intraoral appliance is deformed.

The determining step may comprise determining if the intraoral appliance has a defect. The determining step may comprise determining if the intraoral appliance is applying an appropriate force to the patient's teeth.

As mentioned above, any of these methods and apparatuses may be configured to monitor mandibular repositioning using an orthodontic appliance. For example, determining the correct interaction between mandibular repositioning features of an appliance.

A mandibular repositioning system may include: a first intraoral appliance shaped to receive the patient's upper teeth and comprising a first mandibular repositioning feature; a first sensor disposed on or in the first mandibular repositioning feature; a second intraoral appliance shaped to receive the patient's lower teeth and comprising a second mandibular repositioning feature; a second sensor disposed on or in the second mandibular repositioning feature; at least one processor configured to receive sensor data from either or both the first and second sensors to detect contact between the first and second mandibular repositioning features. The first and second sensors may include one or more of: capacitive sensors, magnetic sensors, force sensors, pressure sensors, and optical sensors.

The at least one processor may be disposed on or within the first intraoral appliance or the second intraoral appliance. The at least one processor may be disposed on or within an electronic system remote from the first and second intraoral appliances. Any of these systems may include wireless communication electronics disposed on or within the first intraoral appliance or the second intraoral appliance, the wireless communication electronics being configured to transfer sensor data from the first and second sensors to the at least one processor.

The first and second intraoral appliances may comprises a polymeric shell having a plurality of teeth-receiving cavities.

In some variations the system further includes a third sensor disposed on or in the first mandibular repositioning feature; a fourth sensor disposed on or in the second mandibular repositioning feature; wherein the first sensor is disposed on a first side of the first mandibular repositioning feature, the third sensor is disposed on a second side of the first mandibular repositioning feature, the second sensor is disposed on a first side of the second mandibular repositioning feature, and the fourth sensor is disposed on a second side of the second mandibular repositioning feature; and wherein the at least one processor is configured to receive sensor data from the first, second, third, and fourth sensors to detect proper positioning when the first sensor contacts the second sensor, and to detect reverse positioning when the third sensor contacts the fourth sensor.

Also described herein are methods for monitoring a mandibular repositioning system, the method comprising: receiving sensed parameters from a first plurality of sensors of a first orthodontic appliance worn in a patient's mouth and a second plurality of sensors of a second orthodontic appliance worn in a patient's mouth, wherein the first orthodontic appliance is shaped to receive the patient's upper teeth and comprises the first plurality of sensors on or adjacent to a first positioning feature of the first intraoral appliance, further wherein the second orthodontic appliance is shaped to receive the patient's lower teeth and comprises the second plurality of sensors on or adjacent to a second positioning feature of the second intraoral appliance; and determining engagement between the first positioning feature and the second positioning feature based on the sensed parameter.

Also described herein are apparatuses (devices and systems) for monitoring palatal expansion by detecting movement/separation of the palatal suture, including detecting while applying force to expand the palatal suture. For example, described herein are palatal expander devices comprising: a palatal expander body comprising a palatal region and a tooth-receiving region configured to receive teeth of the patient's upper arch; a sensor disposed on or in the palatal region of the palatal expander body; at least one processor configured to receive sensor data from the sensor and to determine an expansion state of a patient's palatal region based on the sensor data. The sensor may comprises one or more of: a force sensor, an optical sensor, a strain gauge, a capacitive electrode. The at least one processor may be disposed on or within the palatal expander body.

The at least one processor may be disposed on or within an electronic device remote from the palatal expander device. Any of these devices may include wireless communication electronics disposed on or within the first intraoral appliance or the second intraoral appliance, the wireless communication electronics being configured to transfer sensor data from the sensor to the at least one processor. The palatal expander body may comprise a polymeric shell having a plurality of teeth-receiving cavities. The at least one processor may evaluate a size of a mid palatine suture of the patient based on the sensor data. For example, the at least one processor may determine a change in deformation of the palatal expander device based on the sensor data. In some variations, the at least one processor determines an expansion force of the palatal expander device based on the sensor data.

Also described herein are methods of monitoring palatal expansion, the method comprising: receiving sensor data from one or more sensors on a palatal expander device, as the palatal expander device is worn by a patient, wherein the palatal expander device comprises a palatal expander body including a palatal region and a tooth-receiving region, wherein the one or more sensors are on or in the palatal region; monitoring, in one processors, the sensor data from the sensor to determine an expansion state of a patient's palate based on the sensor data; and outputting an indicator of the expansion state of the patient's palate.

Receiving sensor data may comprise receiving sensor data from one or more sensors comprises receiving sensor data from a pair of sensors positioned opposite the patient's palatal suture. Receiving sensor data may comprise receiving sensor data from one or more sensors comprises receiving sensor data from one or more optical sensors.

Receiving sensor data may comprise receiving sensor data from one or more sensors comprises receiving sensor data from one or more capacitive sensors. Monitoring may comprise monitoring over a time period of greater than one day (e.g., more than: 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 3 days, 4 days, 5 days, etc.). Monitoring may be continuous (e.g., at periodic intervals, e.g. 100 Hz, 10 Hz, 1 Hz, 1/min, every 2 min, every 3 min, every 5 min, every 10 min, every 30 min, every hour, etc.) or at discrete intervals (e.g., when requested by a user, etc.). As mentioned, any of these methods may include wirelessly transmitting the sensor data to the one or more processors.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:

FIG. 1A illustrates an example of a tooth repositioning appliance.

FIGS. 1B-1D shows an example of a tooth repositioning system.

FIG. 2 illustrates a method of orthodontic treatment using a plurality of appliances.

FIG. 3 schematically illustrates an example of a monitoring apparatus (shown as an ECI device).

FIG. 4 illustrates a flowchart showing a method for monitoring an orthodontic device.

FIG. 5A shows a first example of an apparatus including an aligner appliance configured to determine and/or monitor a state of the aligner.

FIG. 5B shows a second example of an apparatus including a pair of (upper arch, lower arch) aligners configured to determine the state of the aligner.

FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate one embodiment of an orthodontic device comprising a mandibular repositioning device.

FIGS. 6C-6E show an example of a mandibular repositioning device that can detect both proper engagement and reverse engagement of positioning features.

FIG. 7 is an example of portion of a mandibular repositioning apparatus including an engagement feature having a pair of sensors (e.g., capacitive sensors).

FIGS. 7A-7B illustrate operation of the sensors of the mandibular repositioning apparatus shown in FIG. 7 (enlarged) configured to assess device quality.

FIG. 8 illustrates a dental appliance with sensors that can detect defects in the appliance.

FIG. 9A is an example of a scan through a patient's head, showing a thickness of palate mucosa at the mid palatine raphe; in some variations, the apparatuses described herein may be configured as palatal expanders including one or more sensors. The sensors may be configured to determine the thickness of this mid palatine raphe region and/or the status of the palatal expander.

FIG. 9B is an example of a palatal expander apparatus that may be adapted to include one or more sensors for determining a property of the palate and/or the status of the palatal expander, as described herein.

FIGS. 10A-10F show examples of a palatal expander device that can include any number or type of sensor to determine an expansion state of the palatal expander device based on sensor data.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The orthodontic apparatuses described herein are configured to determine a state of the orthodontic apparatus based on sensor data. The state of the orthodontic apparatus typically refers to how well device is operating. For example the state of the orthodontic device may refer to the state of the orthodontic appliances's patient contact, including the extent and/or duration of contact with relevant portions of a patient's oral cavity (teeth, gingiva, palate, etc.) and/or contact with another orthodontic apparatus or another region of the orthodontic apparatus. The state of the orthodontic apparatus may alternatively or additionally refer to the state of integrity of the orthodontic appliance, including detecting and/or monitoring any damage or defects in the device (e.g., breakages, tears, cavities, etc.).

Any of the apparatuses described herein may be configured to monitor one or more of: the operation (including status, e.g., operational status) of an orthodontic appliance, and/or to monitor the user compliance for wearing an appliance, and/or to monitor the overall wear or condition of an orthodontic appliance, and/or to monitor the interaction between an appliance with the patient's anatomy, e.g., teeth, gingiva, palate, etc.

Generally, these apparatuses include one or more orthodontic appliance and one or more sensors on the orthodontic appliance that are configured to detect one or more parameters that may be used to determine the state of the orthodontic apparatus. The one or more sensors may be configured based on their position on and/or in the orthodontic appliance, and/or based on their shape and size, and/or based on the type of sensor. Any appropriate type of sensor may be used, including: electrical sensors (e.g., detecting capacitance, conductance, etc.), force sensors (e.g., detecting pressure, strain, etc.), thermal sensors, etc. Examples of sensors are provided herein. The sensors may be embedded within the orthodontic apparatus and oriented to sense properties of the orthodontic appliance directly, rather than the patient. For example, the sensors may be oriented away from the patient, toward the body of the orthodontic appliance.

Any of these apparatuses may include one or more processors configured to communicate with the one or more sensors. The processor(s) may be attached to and/or integral with the orthodontic appliance. For example the processor may receive sensor input from one or more of the sensors and may send control commands to activate/deactivate and/or modulate the sensors. The processor may control the timing of sensing. The processor may regulate the power. The processor may also include or be connected to a memory for storing the data (raw data and/or processed data). The processor may also be functionally connected to a communications module (e.g., wireless communications circuitry, such as Bluetooth, WiFi, etc.).

As will be described in greater detail below, the processor may analyze the sensor data from the one or more sensors to determine the state of the orthodontic apparatus. The analysis of the sensor data may be performed on the one or more processors attached to (on or in) the orthodontic appliance, or the one or more processors (including an additional off-appliance processor) may be used to analyze or further analyze the data to determine a state of the orthodontic appliance.

For example, an orthodontic apparatus may record sensor data from an intraoral appliance, such as dental/orthodontic aligners, including shell aligners. Data recorded by the orthodontic device may be stored in physical memory on the device and may be retrieved by another device. In particular, the data described may be retrieved by a hand held electronics communication device such as a smartphone, tablet, or the like. The handheld electronic device may include a user interface to augment communication between the orthodontic device and the electronic device, and may provide feedback to the user (e.g., patient) and/or technician, physician, dentist, orthodontist, or other medical/dental practitioner. Once transmitted to the handheld device, the data may be processed (or further processed) and/or passed on to a remote processor, memory and/or server.

As mentioned, the apparatuses and methods described herein for monitoring an orthodontic appliance (e.g., a removable intraoral appliances) may generate sensor data related to the intraoral appliance. The sensor data can be processed and analyzed to determine whether the appliance is functioning properly or has a defect. Additionally, the sensor data may be used to provide information about the state of the device. Advantageously, the apparatuses and methods described herein may provide an integrated electronic sensing and logging system capable of generating more reliable and accurate patient compliance data, which may be used by the treating practitioner to track the state of the orthodontic device and improve treatment efficacy. Additionally, the orthodontic devices described herein may provide high value sensing data useful for appliance design. In some embodiments, the sensing data provided by the orthodontic devices described herein may be used as feedback to modify parameters of an ongoing orthodontic treatment, also known as adaptive closed-loop treatment planning. For example, information about the contact between the appliance and the patient's oral cavity and/or about defects or wear in an appliance may be used to determine if a replacement or modified version of the appliance should be used.

As mentioned, in any of the methods and apparatuses described herein, all or some of the sensor data of the state of the orthodontic device may be used as feedback into a treatment plan, including the treatment plan in which the appliance from which the sensor data was collected is part of. For example, sensor data indicating the relative change in position and/or orientation of one or more portions of the appliance may be used to estimate and/or approximate movement of all or some of the patient's dentition, and this information may be used to modify the treatment plan, including the duration of one or more stages, the modification of one or more current and/or future stages, or the like. Any of these methods and apparatuses may provide feedback to a patient and/or user (e.g., doctor, dentist, orthodontist, technician, etc.) on the performance of the appliance and/or treatment plan. Feedback may be reported and/or implemented in real time or after some time delay.

In any of the methods and apparatuses described herein, the use of the one or more sensors for detecting a state of the orthodontic device may be used to refine a treatment plan. Refining of the treatment plan may include reducing or eliminating the number of modifications to an original treatment plan and/or an extension of the treatment plan duration (overall or incremental duration of one or more stages). For example, the use of one or more sensors to detect a state of the orthodontic device may provide feedback that may be used to adjust the treatment plan or one or more stages of the treatment plan on the fly, which may reduce the total overall number of adjustments necessary. In some variations, a treatment plan may be adjusted based on sensor data of a state of the orthodontic device to adjust further, subsequently worn, orthodontic appliances; if the sensor data indicates, for example, that a portion of the aligner is under strain or stress beyond an expected value, this may indicate that a tooth, group of teeth and/or palatal region are not moving in response to the force(s) being applied by the appliance(s). Thus, the system or apparatus may adjust the treatment plan accordingly, e.g., by wearing the appliance until the forces on the appliance and/or the relative positions or orientations of (all or regions of) the appliance are within a determined range, and/or by providing additional appliances that may address the change from an expected value.

An orthodontic apparatus may be any orthodontic device, system or the like, including in particular orthodontic appliances such as aligners, palatal expanders and/or mandibular repositioning apparatus. The orthodontic apparatuses described herein may be removable (e.g., removably by the patient) or they may be attached (e.g., by a dental professional). An orthodontic apparatus may include multiple orthodontic appliances, including an upper arch appliance and a lower arch appliance. In some variations the apparatuses and methods described herein may detect the interaction between multiple separate orthodontic appliances. Examples of each of these variations are described in detail below.

The various embodiments described herein can be used as part of or in combination with various types of intraoral appliances worn in a patient's mouth. The intraoral appliance may be an orthodontic appliance, such as an aligner or wire-and-bracket appliance, used to reposition one or more of the patient's teeth to a desired arrangement, e.g., to correct a malocclusion. Alternatively or additionally, the intraoral appliance may be used to maintain one or more of the patient's teeth in a current arrangement, such as a retainer. Other examples of intraoral appliances suitable for use in conjunction with the embodiments herein include, mouth guards, mandibular repositioning devices, and palatal expanders.

Appliances having teeth receiving cavities that receive and may reposition teeth, e.g., via application of force, are generally illustrated with regard to FIG. 1A. FIG. 1A illustrates an exemplary tooth repositioning appliance or aligner 100 that can be worn by a patient in order to achieve an incremental repositioning of individual teeth 102 in the jaw. The appliance can include a shell having teeth-receiving cavities that receive and resiliently reposition the teeth. An appliance or portion(s) thereof may be indirectly fabricated using a physical model of teeth. For example, an appliance (e.g., polymeric appliance) can be formed using a physical model of teeth and a sheet of suitable layers of polymeric material. In some embodiments, a physical appliance is directly fabricated, e.g., using rapid prototyping fabrication techniques, from a digital model of an appliance.

Although appliances such as the ones shown in FIGS. 1A-1D may be referred to as polymeric shell appliances, the embodiments disclosed herein are well suited for use with many appliances that receive teeth, for example appliances without one or more of polymers or shells, or with partial tooth-receiving regions. The appliance can be fabricated with one or more of many materials such as metal, glass, reinforced fibers, carbon fiber, composites, reinforced composites, aluminum, biological materials, and combinations thereof for example. The appliance can be shaped in many ways, such as with thermoforming or direct fabrication (e.g., 3D printing, additive manufacturing), for example. Alternatively or in combination, the appliance can be fabricated with machining such as an appliance fabricated from a block of material with computer numeric control machining.

An appliance can fit over all teeth present in an upper or lower jaw, or less than all of the teeth. The appliance can be designed specifically to accommodate the teeth of the patient (e.g., the topography of the tooth-receiving cavities matches the topography of the patient's teeth), and may be fabricated based on positive or negative models of the patient's teeth generated by impression, scanning, and the like. Alternatively or additionally, the appliance can be a generic appliance configured to receive the teeth, but not necessarily shaped to match the topography of the patient's teeth. In some cases, only certain teeth received by an appliance will be repositioned by the appliance while other teeth can provide a base or anchor region for holding the appliance in place as it applies force against the tooth or teeth targeted for repositioning. In some embodiments, some, most, or even all of the teeth may be repositioned at some point during treatment. Teeth that are moved can also serve as a base or anchor for holding the appliance as it is worn by the patient. Typically, no wires or other means will be provided for holding an appliance in place over the teeth. In some cases, however, it may be desirable or necessary to provide individual attachments or other anchoring elements 104 on teeth 102 with corresponding receptacles or apertures 106 in the appliance 100 so that the appliance can apply a selected force on the tooth. Exemplary appliances, including those utilized in the Invisalign® System, are described in numerous patents and patent applications assigned to Align Technology, Inc. including, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,450,807, and 5,975,893, as well as on the company's website, which is accessible on the World Wide Web (see, e.g., the URL “invisalign.com”). Examples of tooth-mounted attachments suitable for use with orthodontic appliances are also described in patents and patent applications assigned to Align Technology, Inc., including, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,309,215 and 6,830,450.

Appliances such as the ones shown in FIG. 1A may also be used as a platform or support for other oral appliances that do not move teeth (or move teeth in addition to other therapeutic effect), but may, for example, adjust bite or re-shape the palate. For example a mandibular repositioning apparatus may include a pair of body regions also including a tooth-receiving cavities within shell-like structures (one for the upper jaw, one for the lower jaw) that are configured to secure over or onto a patient's teeth. The tooth-receiving portion may provide support against which other regions, such as positioning features, may brace. Similarly, a palatal expander apparatus may include one or more tooth-receiving portions in addition to a palatal region configured to be adjacent to the patient's palate.

FIGS. 1B-1D illustrate an example of a tooth repositioning system 110 (configured as a series of aligners) including a plurality of appliances 112, 114, 116. Any of the appliances described herein can be designed and/or provided as part of a set of a plurality of appliances used in a tooth repositioning system. Each appliance may be configured so a tooth-receiving cavity has a geometry corresponding to an intermediate or final tooth arrangement intended for the appliance. The patient's teeth can be progressively repositioned from an initial tooth arrangement to a target tooth arrangement by placing a series of incremental position adjustment appliances over the patient's teeth. For example, the tooth repositioning system 110 can include a first appliance 112 corresponding to an initial tooth arrangement, one or more intermediate appliances 114 corresponding to one or more intermediate arrangements, and a final appliance 116 corresponding to a target arrangement. A target tooth arrangement can be a planned final tooth arrangement selected for the patient's teeth at the end of all planned orthodontic treatment. Alternatively, a target arrangement can be one of some intermediate arrangements for the patient's teeth during the course of orthodontic treatment, which may include various different treatment scenarios, including, but not limited to, instances where surgery is recommended, where interproximal reduction (IPR) is appropriate, where a progress check is scheduled, where anchor placement is best, where palatal expansion is desirable, where restorative dentistry is involved (e.g., inlays, onlays, crowns, bridges, implants, veneers, and the like), etc. As such, it is understood that a target tooth arrangement can be any planned resulting arrangement for the patient's teeth that follows one or more incremental repositioning stages. Likewise, an initial tooth arrangement can be any initial arrangement for the patient's teeth that is followed by one or more incremental repositioning stages.

The various embodiments of the orthodontic appliances presented herein can be fabricated in a wide variety of ways. As an example, some embodiments of the appliances herein (or portions thereof) can be produced using indirect fabrication techniques, such as by thermoforming over a positive or negative mold. Indirect fabrication of an orthodontic appliance can involve producing a positive or negative mold of the patient's dentition in a target arrangement (e.g., by rapid prototyping, milling, etc.) and thermoforming one or more sheets of material over the mold in order to generate an appliance shell. Alternatively or in combination, some embodiments of the appliances herein may be directly fabricated, e.g., using rapid prototyping, stereolithography, 3D printing, and the like.

The configuration of the orthodontic appliances herein can be determined according to a treatment plan for a patient, e.g., a treatment plan involving successive administration of a plurality of appliances for incrementally repositioning teeth. Computer-based treatment planning and/or appliance manufacturing methods can be used in order to facilitate the design and fabrication of appliances. For instance, one or more of the appliance components described herein can be digitally designed and fabricated with the aid of computer-controlled manufacturing devices (e.g., computer numerical control (CNC) milling, computer-controlled rapid prototyping such as 3D printing, etc.). The computer-based methods presented herein can improve the accuracy, flexibility, and convenience of appliance fabrication.

In some embodiments, orthodontic appliances, such as the appliance illustrated in FIG. 1A, when properly worn, may impart forces to the crown of a tooth and/or an attachment positioned on the tooth at one or more points of contact between a tooth receiving cavity of the appliance and received tooth and/or attachment. The magnitude of each of these forces and/or their distribution on the surface of the tooth can determine the type of orthodontic tooth movement which results. Tooth movements may be in any direction in any plane of space, and may comprise one or more of rotation or translation along one or more axes. Types of tooth movements include extrusion, intrusion, rotation, tipping, translation, and root movement, and combinations thereof, as discussed further herein. Tooth movement of the crown greater than the movement of the root can be referred to as tipping. Equivalent movement of the crown and root can be referred to as translation. Movement of the root greater than the crown can be referred to as root movement.

FIG. 2 illustrates a method 200 of orthodontic treatment using a plurality of appliances, in accordance with embodiments. The method 200 can be practiced using any of the appliances or appliance sets described herein. In step 210, a first orthodontic appliance is applied to a patient's teeth in order to reposition the teeth from a first tooth arrangement to a second tooth arrangement. In step 220, a second orthodontic appliance is applied to the patient's teeth in order to reposition the teeth from the second tooth arrangement to a third tooth arrangement. The method 200 can be repeated as necessary using any suitable number and combination of sequential appliances in order to incrementally reposition the patient's teeth from an initial arrangement to a target arrangement. The appliances can be generated all at the same stage or time point, in sets or batches (e.g., at the beginning of one or more stages of the treatment), or one at a time, and the patient can wear each appliance until the pressure of each appliance on the teeth can no longer be felt or until the maximum amount of expressed tooth movement for that given stage has been achieved. A plurality of different appliances (e.g., a set) can be designed and even fabricated prior to the patient wearing any appliance of the plurality. After wearing an appliance for an appropriate period of time, the patient can replace the current appliance with the next appliance in the series until no more appliances remain. The appliances are generally not affixed to the teeth and the patient may place and replace the appliances at any time during the procedure (e.g., patient-removable appliances). The final appliance or several appliances in the series may have a geometry or geometries selected to overcorrect the tooth arrangement. For instance, one or more appliances may have a geometry that would (if fully achieved) move individual teeth beyond the tooth arrangement that has been selected as the “final.” Such over-correction may be desirable in order to offset potential relapse after the repositioning method has been terminated (e.g., permit movement of individual teeth back toward their pre-corrected positions). Over-correction may also be beneficial to speed the rate of correction (e.g., an appliance with a geometry that is positioned beyond a desired intermediate or final position may shift the individual teeth toward the position at a greater rate). In such cases, the use of an appliance can be terminated before the teeth reach the positions defined by the appliance. Furthermore, over-correction may be deliberately applied in order to compensate for any inaccuracies or limitations of the appliance.

Predictable and effective tooth movement using an aligner such as those described above, however, may depend implicitly on good contact between the patient's teeth and the aligner. Thus, treatment efficacy may depend at least partially on fit, and the ability of the patient to properly wear the device, as well as the integrity of the apparatus itself. Thus, the methods and apparatuses described herein, which may detect and monitor these parameters, may improve patient treatment and outcomes.

An intraoral appliance can be operably coupled to a monitoring device configured to provide data related to a state of the intraoral appliance. Alternatively or in combination, the monitoring device can be configured to provide data indicative of one or more characteristics of the device, such as electrical parameters, elasticity, defects such as air bubbles or cracks, force applied by the appliance, or deformations of the appliance. The characteristics of the intraoral appliance can determine a state of the appliance.

The apparatuses described herein may include the oral appliance (e.g., aligner, palatal expander, etc.) and a status-monitoring sub-system including one or more of: sensors, processor, memory, communications circuitry (including an antenna), clock, power source (e.g., battery, capacitor, inductor, etc.), and connections and/or circuitry to communicate and/or coordinate between these components. The status-monitoring sub-system may be at least partially integrated into the oral appliance. For example, an apparatus as described herein can be configured for use in the patient's intraoral cavity by locating and sizing the monitoring sub-system for use within the oral cavity. For example, the dimensions of a monitoring device may be limited in order to avoid patient discomfort and/or facilitate integration into an intraoral appliance as discussed below. In some embodiments, a monitoring device has a height or thickness less than or equal to about 1.5 mm, or less than or equal to about 2 mm. In some embodiments, a monitoring device has a length or width less than or equal to about 4 mm, or less than or equal to about 5 mm. The shape of the monitoring device can be varied as desired, e.g., circular, ellipsoidal, triangular, square, rectangular, etc. For instance, in some embodiments, a monitoring device can have a circular shape with a diameter less than or equal to about 5 mm.

FIG. 3 schematically illustrates an orthodontic apparatus 300 including an intraoral appliance configured to be worn on one or more of the patient's teeth, gingiva, and/or palate 301 and a status-monitoring sub-system 302. The status-monitoring sub-system may include an electronics module (“ECI”) 303 that connects or interfaces with one or more sensor(s) on the appliance. The orthodontic apparatus 300 can be used in combination with any embodiment of the systems and devices described herein, and the components of the orthodontic apparatus 300 may be equally applicable to any other embodiment of the orthodontic apparatuses described herein. All or a portion of the status-monitoring sub-system 303 of the orthodontic apparatus 300, such as the electronics module 303 can be implemented as an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) including one or more of: a processor 302, a memory 304, a clock 308, a communication unit 310, an antenna 312, a power management unit 314, or a power source 316. One or more sensors 306, may be included as part of (e.g., integrated with) the electronics, or it may be separate, and may be connected by one or more electric traces (e.g., wires or other traces). The processor 302 (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU), microprocessor, field programmable gate array (FPGA), logic or state machine circuit, etc.), also referred to herein as a controller, can be configured to perform the various methods described herein. The memory 304 encompasses various types of memory known to those of skill in the art, such as RAM (e.g., SRAM, DRAM), ROM (EPROM, PROM, MROM), or hybrid memory (e.g., flash, NVRAM, EEPROM), and the like. The memory 304 can be used to store instructions executable by the processor 302 to perform the methods provided herein. Additionally, the memory can be used to store sensor data obtained by the sensor(s) 306, as discussed in greater detail below.

The orthodontic apparatus 300 can include any number of sensors 306, such as one, two, three, four, five, or more sensors. In some embodiments, the use of multiple sensors provides redundancy to increase the accuracy and reliability of the resultant data. Some or all of the sensors 306 can be of the same type. Some or all of the sensors 306 can be of different types. Examples of sensor types suitable for use in the monitoring devices described herein include: touch or tactile sensors (e.g., capacitive, resistive), proximity sensors, audio sensors (e.g., microelectromechanical system (MEMS) microphones), color sensors (e.g., RGB color sensors), electromagnetic sensors (e.g., magnetic reed sensors, magnetometer), light sensors, force sensors (e.g., force-dependent resistive materials), pressure sensors, temperature sensors, motion sensors (e.g., accelerometers, gyroscopes), vibration sensors, piezoelectric sensors, strain gauges, pH sensors, conductivity sensors, gas flow sensors, gas detection sensors, humidity or moisture sensors, physiological sensors (e.g., electrocardiography sensors, bio-impedance sensors, photoplethysmography sensors, galvanic skin response sensors), or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the sensors herein can be configured as a switch that is activated and/or deactivated in response to a particular type of signal (e.g., optical, electrical, magnetic, mechanical, etc.).

In any of the apparatuses and methods described herein a sensor may be configured to sensor or detect change in the orientation of the appliance and/or of one or more region of the appliance relative to one or more other regions of the appliance. For example, a sensor may be a gyroscope (e.g., a microelectromechanical systems (“MEMS”) gyroscope or any other appropriate gyroscope and/or accelerometer, and/or any other appropriate motion sensor.

A sensor 306 can be located at any portion of an intraoral appliance, such as at or near a distal portion, a mesial portion, a buccal portion, a lingual portion, a gingival portion, an occlusal portion, or a combination thereof. A sensor 306 can be embedded within the appliance(s), including in any of these regions or portions. In embodiments where multiple sensors 306 are used, some or all of the sensors can be located at different portions of the appliance and/or intraoral cavity. Alternatively, some or all of the sensors 306 can be located at the same portion of the appliance and/or intraoral cavity.

An analog-to-digital converter (ADC) (not shown) can be used to convert analog sensor data into digital format, if desired. The processor 302 can process the sensor data obtained by the sensor(s) 306 in order to determine appliance usage and/or patient compliance, as described herein. The sensor data and/or processing results can be stored in the memory 304. Optionally, the stored data can be associated with a timestamp generated by the clock 308 (e.g., a real-time clock or counter).

The orthodontic apparatus 300 may include a communication unit 310 configured to transmit the data stored in the memory (e.g., sensor data and/or processing results) to a remote device. The communication unit 310 can utilize any suitable communication method, such as wired or wireless communication methods (e.g., RFID, near-field communication, Bluetooth, ZigBee, infrared, etc.). The communication unit 310 can include a transmitter for transmitting data to the remote device and an antenna 312. Optionally, the communication unit 310 includes a receiver for receiving data from the remote device. In some embodiments, the communication channel utilized by the communication unit 310 can also be used to power the device 300, e.g., during data transfer or if the device 300 is used passively.

The remote device can be any computing device or system, such as a mobile device (e.g., smartphone), personal computer, laptop, tablet, wearable device, etc. Optionally, the remote device can be a part of or connected to a cloud computing system (“in the cloud”). The remote device can be associated with the patient, the treating practitioner, medical practitioners, researchers, etc. In some embodiments, the remote device is configured to process and analyze the data from the monitoring apparatus 300, e.g., in order to monitor patient compliance and/or appliance usage, for research purposes, and the like.

The orthodontic apparatus 300 can be powered by a power source 316, such as a battery. In some embodiments, the power source 316 is a printed and/or flexible battery, such as a zinc-carbon flexible battery, a zinc-manganese dioxide printed flexible battery, or a solid-state thin film lithium phosphorus oxynitride battery. The use of printed and/or flexible batteries can be advantageous for reducing the overall size of the status-monitoring sub-system of the orthodontic apparatus 300 and avoiding patient discomfort. For example, printed batteries can be fabricated in a wide variety of shapes and can be stacked to make three-dimensional structures, e.g., to conform the appliance and/or teeth geometries. Likewise, flexible batteries can be shaped to lie flush with the surfaces of the appliance and/or teeth. Alternatively or in combination, other types of batteries can be used, such as supercapacitors. In some embodiments, the power source 316 can utilize lower power energy harvesting methods (e.g., thermodynamic, electrodynamic, piezoelectric) in order to generate power for the orthodontic device 300. Optionally, the power source 316 can be rechargeable, for example, using via inductive or wireless methods. In some embodiments, the patient can recharge the power source 316 when the appliance is not in use. For example, the patient can remove the intraoral appliance when brushing the teeth and place the appliance on an inductive power hub to recharge the power source 316.

Optionally, the orthodontic apparatus 300 can include a power management unit 314 connected to the power source 316. The power management unit 314 can be configured to control when the status-monitoring sub-system of the apparatus 300 is active (e.g., using power from the power source 316) and when the device 300 is inactive (e.g., not using power from the power source 316). In some embodiments, the orthodontic apparatus 300 is only active during certain times so as to lower power consumption and reduce the size of the power source 316, thus allowing for a smaller status-monitoring sub-system 302. In some embodiments, the orthodontic apparatus 300 includes an activation mechanism (not shown) for controlling when the status monitoring sub-system of the orthodontic apparatus 300 is active (e.g., powered on, monitoring appliance usage) and when the status monitoring sub-system of the orthodontic apparatus 300 is dormant (e.g., powered off, not monitoring appliance usage). The activation mechanism can be provided as a discrete component of the orthodontic device 300, or can be implemented by the processor 302, the power management unit 314, or a combination thereof. The activation mechanism can be used to reduce the amount of power used by the orthodontic apparatus 300, e.g., by inactivating the device 300 when not in use, which can be beneficial for reducing the size of the power supply 316 and thus the overall device size.

A sensor (or any other part of the status-monitoring sub-system) can be operably coupled to the intraoral appliance in a variety of ways. For example, the sensor can be physically integrated with the intraoral appliance by coupling the sensor to a portion of the appliance (e.g., using adhesives, fasteners, latching, laminating, molding, etc.), and/or embedding it within the apparatus (e.g., at the time of forming the apparatus or afterwards. For example, the coupling may be a releasable coupling allowing for removal of the monitoring device from the appliance, or may be a permanent coupling in which the monitoring device is permanently affixed to the appliance. Alternatively or in combination, the sensor can be physically integrated with the intraoral appliance by encapsulating, embedding, printing, or otherwise forming the monitoring device with the appliance. In some embodiments, the appliance includes a shell shaped to receive the patient's teeth, and the sensor is physically integrated with the shell. The sensor can be located on an inner surface of the shell (e.g., the surface adjacent to the received teeth), an outer surface of the shell (e.g., the surface away from the received teeth), or within a wall of the shell. Optionally, as discussed further herein, the shell can include a receptacle shaped to receive the sensor.

An orthodontic apparatus as described herein can include an intraoral appliance shaped to receive the patient's teeth, a first sensor disposed on or in the intraoral appliance, a second sensor disposed on or in the intraoral appliance, and at least one processor configured to receive sensor data from the first and second sensors and to indicate of a state of the orthodontic device based on the sensor data.

In general, the processor may be adapted or otherwise configured to receive and process the sensor data and use this sensor data to determine one or more parameters of the state of the orthodontic appliance that is part of the apparatus, such as the state of the orthodontic appliance's patient contact and/or the state of the orthodontic appliance's integrity. The processor may include non-volatile memory that contains instructions (e.g. software, firmware, etc.) for executing any of the steps described herein, including controlling the sensor(s) and receiving sensor data, and/or processing the data to determine a state of the appliance (e.g., the state of integrity of the appliance or the quality of contact with the patient). For example, the at least one processor can be configured to indicate that the orthodontic device is broken, worn, and/or deformed. Additionally, the processor can be configured to indicate that the orthodontic device has a defect. In some examples, the at least one processor is configured to indicate that the orthodontic device is applying an appropriate force to the patient's teeth. Additionally, the at least one processor can be configured to indicate a position of the first sensor relative to a position of the second sensor.

In any of the apparatuses described herein, the apparatus may determine if a first region (corresponding to a first sensor) is within a predetermined distance of a second region (corresponding to a second sensor), indicating the apparatus is being correctly worn and/or operated. For example, if the orthodontic device is a mandibular repositioning device, the processor can be configured to indicate that the first sensor is in close proximity to the second sensor, thereby determining if positioning features of the device are properly engaged.

FIG. 4 illustrates a flowchart 400 showing an example of a method for monitoring an orthodontic apparatus to determine a state of an orthodontic appliance forming part of the apparatus (e.g., a state of the orthodontic appliance's patient contact and/or the state of the orthodontic appliance's state of integrity. At step 402 of flowchart 400, the method can include positioning an intraoral apparatus in the patient's intraoral cavity. The intraoral apparatus can include an appliance be shaped to receive the patient's teeth and can comprise a plurality of sensors each positioned within the intraoral appliance to sense a characteristic of the appliance. In some examples, the intraoral appliance is a dental aligner. The apparatus may include an upper arch aligner configured to receive the patient's upper teeth, and a lower arch aligner configured to receive the patient's lower teeth. In another example, the intraoral apparatus can include a mandibular repositioning appliance (e.g., device). The mandibular repositioning apparatus can include repositioning features configured to engage one another. In yet another example, the intraoral appliance can comprise a palatal expander device.

At step 404 of flowchart 400, the method can further include receiving a sensed value from each of the plurality of sensors. The sensed value can be a parameter sensed by any of a number of different types of sensors. For example, a capacitive sensor may provide a capacitance value, a magnetic sensor may provide an orientation or magnitude of a magnetic field, an optical sensor may provide an output current corresponding to sensed light intensity (at a particular frequency or range of frequencies), a force sensor or strain gauge may provide a force value, and an ultrasonic sensor may provide the duration of a return pulse. These sensed values may be transmitted to a processor in the appliance (or separate from the appliance) and used to determine parameter indicating the state of the appliance. For example, at step 406 of flowchart 400, the method can include determining a state of the orthodontic device based on the sensed values. For example, in one example the determining step comprises determining if a first portion of the intraoral appliance is aligned properly with respect to a second portion of the intraoral appliance. In another example, the determining step comprises determining if the intraoral appliance is deformed. In yet another example, the determining step comprises determining if the intraoral appliance has a defect. In an additional example, the determining step comprises determining if the intraoral appliance is applying an appropriate force to the patient's teeth. In another variation, determining includes determining if the appliance is properly seated on the patient's teeth, gingiva and/or palate. In any of the apparatuses (devices and systems) described herein, one or more optical sensors may be used to detect movement and/or position of one or more regions of the apparatus relative to other regions. For example, an optical sensor may be used to detect expansion of a palatal expander/arch expander.

One the processor has determined one or more parameters indicative of the state of the apparatus, the apparatus may transmit the state of the apparatus 408 and/or the parameters to a remote device for display, storage and/or further transmission. For example the apparatus may transmit to a mobile device held by the patient (e.g., phone, smartphone, tablet, etc.) and/or to a dental professional (dentist, orthodontist, etc.).

FIG. 5 shows a first example of an apparatus comprising an orthodontic device configured to determine, monitor and indicate a state of the orthodontic device. In this example the orthodontic device is an aligner (e.g., a shell aligner) that is shaped to receive the patient's teeth. The aligner 550 includes a tooth-receiving region 551. This tooth receiving region may be a channel configured to substantially conform to the patient's teeth. The channel may have connected chambers each comprising a negative impression of one of the patient's teeth (buccal, lingual and occlusal sides). The chambers may be formed from a scan or impression of the patient's teeth, and may be arranged so as to apply force to reposition one or more of the patient's teeth when worn. In this example, the apparatus may be configured to detect and/or monitor and/or indicate the state of the aligner, and more specifically, the state of the orthodontic appliance's patient contact. As shown in FIG. 5A, a plurality of sensors 553 are shown within the occlusal channel of the tooth-receiving region 551. These sensors are configured to detect contact or proximity with a tooth received in each region (e.g., chamber) of the aligner. For example, each sensor may include a capacitive sensor, or a pair of electrodes configured to detect capacitance; proximity to the sensor(s) may be detected by the sensor which may each return a value (e.g., a voltage or current level based on the capacitance detected) corresponding to the proximity of a tooth when the apparatus is being worn. In operation, this arrangement, in which sensors configured as proximity or contact sensors are arranged in the deepest part of the tooth-receiving region 551, as shown in FIG. 5A, may provide a range of values that may be used to determine if the aligner is fully and properly seated on all of the patient's teeth. These sensors may be pairs of sensor emitters and sensor receivers, or they may be combined emitters/receivers. In some variations sensor emitters may be adjacent to sensor receivers.

The apparatus in FIG. 5A may also include any of the sub-systems for determining the state of the orthodontic appliance (e.g., aligner). In FIG. 5A, for example, the apparatus includes the plurality of sensors 553, that are each connected (via a conductive trace, wire, etc.) to a housing 555 enclosing one or more of: processor, memory, communications circuitry (e.g., antenna), clock, power source (e.g., battery, capacitor, inductor, etc.). Although capacitive sensors (touch sensors) are shown in FIG. 5A, any appropriate type of sensor may be used, or multiple types of sensors.

In FIG. 5A, the processor(s) may be configured to receive values (capacitance values) from the sensor(s), and may control applying energy to the sensors to determine the capacitance values. The processor may process the individual sensors for an array of different positions corresponding to different teeth and/or regions of the aligner. The array of values may be compared to a threshold value or range of values to determine how well the tooth/teeth are seated at each position. The values may be normalized by one or more normalization sensors 557 (e.g., additional touch sensors) located more laterally (e.g., lingually or buccally) on the aligner. Thus, the processor may be configured to receive sensor data from the first and second sensors and to indicate of a state of the orthodontic device based on the sensor data. The state of the aligner may indicate that the aligner is well seated (with the touch sensors are above a threshold value), poorly seated (which may be a single value or a gradation of values, depending on how deeply the teeth are seated in some or all of the chambers forming the tooth-receiving region), or unseated (when not worn). Thus, although the compliance information (worn/not worn) may be provided by this apparatus, these apparatuses may also provide a great deal of additional information about how well the apparatus may be operating, including how well the device is seated or applied. In some variations the parameters indicating the state of the aligner may include a map showing how well the appliance is/was seated over the dental arch; a time course for seating information may be recorded and reviewed (e.g., over a single night/days use, etc.).

FIG. 5B is another example of an apparatus configured to determine the state of one or more appliances forming the apparatus. In FIG. 5B, the apparatus includes a pair of aligners, an upper arch 561 aligner and a lower arch 563 aligner. This apparatus may be configured to detect intercuspation between the upper and lower aligners. In this example, the lower aligner 563 includes a plurality of sensors 565 that may detect contact with predetermined locations on the upper aligner. For example the upper aligner may also include a plurality of sensors 565′ that, when a particular specific intercuspation is achieved, may return a value. In some variations the upper sensors 565′ may be sensor emitters and the lower sensors 565 may be sensor receivers (or vice versa); in some variations a mixture of complementary sensor receivers and sensor emitters may be distributed between the upper and lower appliances. In some variations compound sensors (e.g., both sensor emitter/sensor receiver sensors) may be used. The value(s) may be tracked (as an array, correlated to location) and may be determined over time. The processor may analyze the values to determine the quality of the contact between the upper and lower jaws when wearing the aligners. As in FIG. 5A, either or both upper and lower aligners may include any of the sub-systems for determining the state of the orthodontic appliance (in this example, intercuspation between the two appliances), which may be duplicated between the two aligners, or may be divvied between them. In FIG. 5B separate housings 575, 575′ may enclose separate processors, power sources, etc. and these two sub-systems may communicate with each other.

FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate one embodiment of an orthodontic apparatus as described herein comprising a mandibular repositioning appliance 500. The mandibular repositioning appliance 500 can comprise first and second intraoral appliances 502, 504 (which may be part of a shell aligner configured to secure to the teeth and/or may reposition them, and may be configured to receive the patient's upper and lower teeth, respectively. Each of the intraoral appliances may include a positioning feature 506, 506′ that are configured to engage with each other. The interaction between the positioning features may drive the jaw (e.g., the patient's lower jaw) to provide orthodontic effect. At least one positioning feature in the apparatus may include at least one sensor 508. In FIG. 6A, both the upper and lower positioning features include sensors. These sensors may detect contact and/or proximity between the opposite positioning features, and provide information on the proper functioning of the apparatus, e.g., engagement between the positioning features from the correct sides/locations. In FIG. 6A, the orthodontic apparatus can further include at least one processor and any of the additional components of the sensing sub-systems, as described in more detail above.

FIG. 6B is an alternative view of a first or upper appliance 502′ for an intraoral apparatus 500′, including a positioning feature 506. The positioning feature can include a sensor 508; in this example, the sensor includes two portions (e.g., a pair of electrodes 518, 518′). The sensor can be any type of sensor as described herein. For example, the sensor can be a capacitive sensor, a magnetic sensor, a force sensor, a push button sensor, a resistive sensor. As mentioned above, these sensors may be configured as sensor emitters/sensor receivers or pairs of sensor emitters/sensor receivers.

Referring back to FIG. 6A, the sensors of the first and second intraoral appliances can provide sensor data to the processor. The processor can be configured to use the sensor data to determine a state of the mandibular repositioning apparatus. For example, the sensor data can be used to determine if the positioning features of the first and second intraoral appliances are properly engaged. Sensors on the mating surfaces of the positioning features can detect contact between the upper and lower positioning features. More sophisticated sensors can detect distance between the positioning features, in addition to contact.

FIGS. 6C-6E show an example of a mandibular repositioning apparatus 500″ that can detect both proper engagement of positioning features, as described above (and shown in FIG. 6D), and reverse engagement, as shown in FIG. 6E. In the example of FIG. 6C sensors 528, 528′, 538, 538′ are positioned on opposite sides of the positioning features 506. FIGS. 6D and 6E illustrate operation of a mandibular repositioning apparatus. In FIGS. 6D and 6E sensors 548, 548′ and 558, 558′ are located on either side of each positioning feature 506, 506′. The processor can then determine which of the sensors are in contact or in close proximity to determine if the mandibular repositioning device is properly engaged (FIG. 6D) or reverse engaged (FIG. 6E).

The sensors of the mandibular repositioning apparatus can further comprise additional sensors, such as sensors configured as compliance indicators (e.g., temperature sensors or accelerometers to give an indication of head position and whether the appliances are being worn, etc.). The processor(s) may be configured to use the additional compliance indicators to determine that engagement is being assessed only when the appliances are worn by the patient. The mandibular repositioning apparatus 500 may therefore be configured to detect compliance and proper use by detecting engagement of the positioning features while the appliances are being worn by the patient.

FIG. 7 illustrates another example of a portion of a mandibular repositioning apparatus, including a sensor (configured as a pair of electrodes 708, 708′). Referring to FIGS. 7A-7B, the sensor 708, 708′ of an orthodontic apparatus can also be used to assess device quality (e.g., structural integrity, defects, etc.). For example, large unsupported thermoformed features, like the mandibular positioning features of FIGS. 6A-6E, may deform during treatment. Sensors (such as capacitive sensors) can be used to detect the deformation of the intraoral appliance. Referring to FIG. 7A, the appliance can include one or more capacitive sensors 708, 708′ that sense static electric field lines 710. In FIG. 7B, the capacitive sensors are able to detect changes in the electric field that the processor may use to determine that the appliance is bent or deformed by sensing changes to the static electric field lines.

Additionally, the sensors can be used to detect defects within the appliance, such as air bubbles or cracks. Referring to FIG. 8, sensors 808 in the appliance can detect the relative permittivity; the processor receiving this value may, over time, detect changes in the relative permittivity of the appliance material resulting from air bubbles or cracks in the appliance. The processor may include one or more thresholds indicating use and/or defect. In FIG. 8, the defects 712 are inclusions or manufacturing defects; defects may develop with use and/or with storage, including delamination of different layers of the device, tearing of the device, inclusion of air bubbles, etc. These defects may negatively impact the appliance performance and/or fit. In some variations the appliance may include a material that may adversely take up water (saliva), particularly in regions that are supposed to remain sealed off. For example, a sealed region for holding electrical components (batteries, wires, electronics, etc.) may be inadvertently opened, exposing it to saliva; one or more sensors may detect this failure mode and alert the patient and/or caregiver. In variations including a mandibular repositioning feature, for example, a cavity or region of the appliance (e.g., in a hollow region) may collect saliva, which may be undesirable (e.g., allowing bacterial growth, etc.). One or more sensors may detect the collection of fluid. Alternatively or additionally, any of these apparatuses may include one or more sensors configured to detect bacterial growth or other contamination.

In any of these variations, the appliance may include one or more temperature sensors that may be used to monitor storage temperature. A temperature sensor on the device may be configured to monitor temperature of the device to indicate that the storage temperature does not exceed a range for safe storage (e.g., greater than 120 degrees F., greater than 125 degrees F., greater than 130 degrees F., greater than 140 degrees F., greater than 150 degrees F., greater than 160 degrees F., greater than 170 degrees F., etc., and/or less than 50 degrees F., less than 40 degrees F., less than 30 degrees F., less than 20 degrees F., less than 10 degrees F., less than 5 degrees F., less than 0 degrees F., etc.).

Thus, the apparatuses and methods described herein may be used with any one or more of the palatal expanders and/or arch expanders. For example, the methods and apparatuses described herein may generally be used to monitor the operation (including status, e.g., operational status) of an appliance including, but not limited to a palatal expander, and/or to monitor the user compliance for wearing an appliance including, but not limited to a palatal expander, and/or to monitor the overall wear or condition of an orthodontic appliance, including, but not limited to a palatal expander and/or to monitor the interaction between an appliance including, but not limited to a palatal expander, with the patient's anatomy, e.g., teeth, gingiva, palate, etc.

FIGS. 9A-9B illustrate a palatal expander that may be configured to monitor and/or determined compliance (e.g., patient compliance in wearing the apparatus) and/or the state of the appliance. For example, FIG. 9A illustrates a scan through a patient's head, showing mucosa tissue at the mid palatine raphe (arrow). In this region, the tissue may be very thin and the apparatuses described herein may be configured to determine the palatal suture opening stages using a capacitive electrode. For example, an electrostatic field may be formed by capacitive electrodes at the soft palate region. Using this technique, a palatal expander can be monitored during the treatment without need to take CTs. FIG. 9B shows an example of a palatal expander formed, similar to an aligner, to include a tooth-retaining region 903 (regions on either side of the device may be configured to conform to a patient's molars and/or premolars) and a palatal region 905 that may be configured to sit adjacent to the palate and apply force on the lingual side of the teeth and/or lateral palate to spread the suture.

FIGS. 10A-10F show examples of a palatal expander device 1000 that can include any number or type of sensor(s) 1008 to monitor the operation of the palatal expander, to monitor the user compliance for wearing the palatal expander, to monitor the overall wear or condition of the palatal expander, and/or to monitor the interaction between the palatal expander and the patient's anatomy. Any of these sensors may be configured as sensor emitters and/or sensor receivers as described herein.

For example, FIG. 10A illustrates a section through an exemplary palatal expander 1000 worn on a subject's dental arch 1009, including region worn on the teeth 1011. In this example, the sensors (two pairs of sensors 1007, 1008 are shown) may be used to determine an expansion state of the palatal expander device based on sensor data. In FIG. 10A, the sensor pairs may detect compliance for wearing the palatal expander; either or both the first sensor pair 1007 and the second sensor pair 1007 may be capacitive sensors that can detect a change in the field between any of the sensors in the pair(s). Thus, for example, when the patient is wearing the palatal expander the sensor(s), which may be electrodes, may determine a change in the capacitance across the pairs consistent with the dental tissue, as compared to air or just water. Alternatively, in some variations the palatal expander may detect a change in the capacitance between an electrode in the first pair 1007 and an electrode in the second pair 1008 that may indicate a change in the structural integrity of the palatal expander. Any of the apparatuses may include a data processing unit (e.g., an electronic module, not shown) that connects to the sensor(s) and may provide power and receive and/or process signals from the sensors. The electronic monitor(s) may log the data (e.g., be configured as a data logger), process the data and/or transmit the data, e.g., to a remote processor, including a remote server. The apparatus, including a data processing unit may store and/or monitor the use of the appliance over time, including alerting the user, a caregiver and/or the patient if the appliance is not being worn for a prescribed duration.

FIG. 10B illustrates an example of a palatal expander apparatus including one or more sensors configured to monitor the interaction between the palatal expander and the patient's anatomy. In FIG. 10B, the sensor may comprise an optical sensor 1008′ (e.g., including in some variations an emitter and a detector) that may determine one or more of: the distance to the tissue (e.g., the palate), and/or the suture opening, based on light contrast between soft-hard tissue and/or the blood stream. In some variations, an ultrasonic sensor may be used. The apparatus, including any data processing unit (not shown) may store and/or monitor a change in the relationship between the patient's tissue and the appliance over time. For example the apparatus may monitor the movement/expansion of the palatal suture opening as the palatal expander operates, and/or the change in the distance between the apparatus and the palate over time. This data may be analyzed locally (e.g., in the data processing unit) or remotely and may be used as feedback to the patient, user and/or caregiver and/or may be used as feedback into an orthodontic treatment plan, including modifying an orthodontic treatment plan.

The palatal expander device 1000 of FIG. 10C shows another example of an apparatus including a sensor for detecting the relationship between the apparatus and the patient's tissue. As mentioned, this sensor may comprise a plurality of capacitive electrodes, and/or in some variations, the sensor may include an optical sensor (e.g., an optical receiver 1008″ and an optical transmitter 1008′″), as shown. This apparatus may be configured to detect the extent of the mucosa tissue at the mid palatine raphe, allowing the processor to detect the mid palatal suture opening when the sensor applied an electrostatic field using the capacitive electrodes on the appliance, positioned opposite from the soft palate region, as described in FIG. 10B. Using this technique the palatal expansion can be monitored during the treatment without need to take CTs. In general, the apparatuses and methods described herein, in particular the palatal expanders, may allow direct monitoring, in real time, of the suture.

FIG. 10D is an example of a palatal expander apparatus configured to monitor the operation of the palatal expander. In FIG. 10D, a sensor 1018 may include one or more capacitive electrodes configured to provide values that can be used by the processor to monitor the change in the deformation of palatal expander; this information may be used, e.g., to determine how much and at what rate the expansion happens. This can be measured by tracking the change of capacity measured between the capacitive sensor electrodes in the expander device. The sensor may be positioned on palatal expander in a way that the distance between the capacitive electrodes changes while the expansion happens. For example, the sensor 1018 can be placed midline of trans-palatal segment. Ultrasonic sensors can also be used an alternative to capacitive electrodes to track the expansion of the palatal expander. Alternatively or additionally, in some variations the sensor(s) may be configured to measure the operation of the apparatus to determine if the palatal expander includes an breaks, cracks, wear, etc., and my thus monitor the overall wear or condition of the palatal expander.

Thus, any of the apparatuses described herein may be configured to detect a failure (e.g., failure mode) of the apparatus, such as a palatal expander apparatus. For example, a palatal expander such as those described herein, may fail if the palatal region deforms under the force (pressure) exerted on the apparatus when inserted into the patient's mouth. One or more sensors on the apparatus, such as those described in reference to FIG. 10D, may detect the deformation, based, e.g., on the position of various regions of the device relative to each other, such as the position of the left half of the palatal region relative to the right half.

FIG. 10F illustrates another example of a palatal expander apparatus configured to monitor the operation of the palatal expander. The device shown in FIG. 10F may be used to directly detect the force applied by the apparatus, e.g., if no force is applied or if lower than an expected threshold (e.g., lower than 8 N) is being applied. In FIG. 10F, the apparatus includes a sensor 1028, such as a strain gauge, that detects stain on the palatal expander, or a region of the palatal expander, such as, e.g., the palatal region configured to be worn adjacent to the patient's palate. In some variations the forces acting on the apparatus may be stored, analyzed and/or transmitted by a data processing unit (not shown); for example the apparatus may be configured to monitor force across the apparatus which may be representative of the forces applied by the patient's teeth and/or palatal region when the device is worn; it may be expected that as the patient's teeth and palate adjusts and adapts to the appliance, these forces may be reduced in an expected manner, e.g., within a predictable fashion. Thus, the sensor values may be analyzed to determine a change in the values over time, indicative of wear (e.g., compliance, when the device is worn in the patient's mouth) and/or operation of the appliance, e.g., when the appliance is moving the teeth and/or palate. The rate of change in the force(s) applied may be within a predicted range indicating effective treatment, or outside of the predicted range (lower, and/or in some cases higher) than expected may indicate a problem in the treatment, particularly if the absolute force applied is higher than an expected value.

In some of these apparatuses, the one or more sensors may be configured to detect compliance (e.g., patient wearing of the apparatus) when the sensor(s) are directed to infer wearing of the device based on the change in sensor value(s) when monitoring the sensor itself. This may be particularly beneficial as compared to direct compliance measurements, in which the relationship between the apparatus and the patient, and particularly a sensor and the patient, may be variable, making reliable contact difficult; the internal anatomy of the mouth, including teeth, gingiva and palate, may be complex, making some sensors, such as flat electrodes, difficult to reliably operate. The method and apparatuses described herein may avoid these problems. In general, the variations described herein that may be used to monitor or measure compliance, may also be configured to monitor the quality of the compliance, including how well the apparatus is worn, or fit, in the patient's mouth. Improper fit may be detected from the sensor values, if they are outside of expected parameter ranges, particularly when wearing the device.

Referring to FIGS. 10E and 10F, a sensor may be, e.g., a strain gauge or force sensors and can be placed at force application regions, such as the lingual side of crowns, or the palatal contact regions, to monitor expansion force of the palatal expander device. The sensor data from the strain gauges or force sensors can be used to determine an expansion state of the device.

When a feature or element is herein referred to as being “on” another feature or element, it can be directly on the other feature or element or intervening features and/or elements may also be present. In contrast, when a feature or element is referred to as being “directly on” another feature or element, there are no intervening features or elements present. It will also be understood that, when a feature or element is referred to as being “connected”, “attached” or “coupled” to another feature or element, it can be directly connected, attached or coupled to the other feature or element or intervening features or elements may be present. In contrast, when a feature or element is referred to as being “directly connected”, “directly attached” or “directly coupled” to another feature or element, there are no intervening features or elements present. Although described or shown with respect to one embodiment, the features and elements so described or shown can apply to other embodiments. It will also be appreciated by those of skill in the art that references to a structure or feature that is disposed “adjacent” another feature may have portions that overlap or underlie the adjacent feature.

Terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. For example, as used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items and may be abbreviated as “/”.

Spatially relative terms, such as “under”, “below”, “lower”, “over”, “upper” and the like, may be used herein for ease of description to describe one element or feature's relationship to another element(s) or feature(s) as illustrated in the figures. It will be understood that the spatially relative terms are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in use or operation in addition to the orientation depicted in the figures. For example, if a device in the figures is inverted, elements described as “under” or “beneath” other elements or features would then be oriented “over” the other elements or features. Thus, the exemplary term “under” can encompass both an orientation of over and under. The device may be otherwise oriented (rotated 90 degrees or at other orientations) and the spatially relative descriptors used herein interpreted accordingly. Similarly, the terms “upwardly”, “downwardly”, “vertical”, “horizontal” and the like are used herein for the purpose of explanation only unless specifically indicated otherwise.

Although the terms “first” and “second” may be used herein to describe various features/elements (including steps), these features/elements should not be limited by these terms, unless the context indicates otherwise. These terms may be used to distinguish one feature/element from another feature/element. Thus, a first feature/element discussed below could be termed a second feature/element, and similarly, a second feature/element discussed below could be termed a first feature/element without departing from the teachings of the present invention.

Throughout this specification and the claims which follow, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise”, and variations such as “comprises” and “comprising” means various components can be co-jointly employed in the methods and articles (e.g., compositions and apparatuses including device and methods). For example, the term “comprising” will be understood to imply the inclusion of any stated elements or steps but not the exclusion of any other elements or steps.

In general, any of the apparatuses and methods described herein should be understood to be inclusive, but all or a sub-set of the components and/or steps may alternatively be exclusive, and may be expressed as “consisting of” or alternatively “consisting essentially of” the various components, steps, sub-components or sub-steps.

As used herein in the specification and claims, including as used in the examples and unless otherwise expressly specified, all numbers may be read as if prefaced by the word “about” or “approximately,” even if the term does not expressly appear. The phrase “about” or “approximately” may be used when describing magnitude and/or position to indicate that the value and/or position described is within a reasonable expected range of values and/or positions. For example, a numeric value may have a value that is +/−0.1% of the stated value (or range of values), +/−1% of the stated value (or range of values), +/−2% of the stated value (or range of values), +/−5% of the stated value (or range of values), +/−10% of the stated value (or range of values), etc. Any numerical values given herein should also be understood to include about or approximately that value, unless the context indicates otherwise. For example, if the value “10” is disclosed, then “about 10” is also disclosed. Any numerical range recited herein is intended to include all sub-ranges subsumed therein. It is also understood that when a value is disclosed that “less than or equal to” the value, “greater than or equal to the value” and possible ranges between values are also disclosed, as appropriately understood by the skilled artisan. For example, if the value “X” is disclosed the “less than or equal to X” as well as “greater than or equal to X” (e.g., where X is a numerical value) is also disclosed. It is also understood that the throughout the application, data is provided in a number of different formats, and that this data, represents endpoints and starting points, and ranges for any combination of the data points. For example, if a particular data point “10” and a particular data point “15” are disclosed, it is understood that greater than, greater than or equal to, less than, less than or equal to, and equal to 10 and 15 are considered disclosed as well as between 10 and 15. It is also understood that each unit between two particular units are also disclosed. For example, if 10 and 15 are disclosed, then 11, 12, 13, and 14 are also disclosed.

Although various illustrative embodiments are described above, any of a number of changes may be made to various embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as described by the claims. For example, the order in which various described method steps are performed may often be changed in alternative embodiments, and in other alternative embodiments one or more method steps may be skipped altogether. Optional features of various device and system embodiments may be included in some embodiments and not in others. Therefore, the foregoing description is provided primarily for exemplary purposes and should not be interpreted to limit the scope of the invention as it is set forth in the claims.

The examples and illustrations included herein show, by way of illustration and not of limitation, specific embodiments in which the subject matter may be practiced. As mentioned, other embodiments may be utilized and derived there from, such that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Such embodiments of the inventive subject matter may be referred to herein individually or collectively by the term “invention” merely for convenience and without intending to voluntarily limit the scope of this application to any single invention or inventive concept, if more than one is, in fact, disclosed. Thus, although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, any arrangement calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description.

Claims

1. An orthodontic appliance system, the system comprising: a first orthodontic appliance having teeth-receiving cavities shaped to receive a patient's teeth;at least two sensor receivers disposed on or in the first orthodontic appliance, wherein each of the at least two sensor receivers is configured to detect a signal from a corresponding sensor emitter of at least two sensor emitters on another portion of the first orthodontic appliance or on a second orthodontic appliance worn by the patient; andat least one processor configured to receive sensor data from the at least two sensor receivers and to determine a relative position, orientation or position and orientation between the at least two sensor receivers and the at least two sensor emitters.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least two sensor receivers comprise one or more of: an optical sensor, an electromagnetic sensor, a capacitive sensor, or a magnetic sensor.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is disposed on or within the first orthodontic appliance.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is coupled via an electrical trace on or in the first orthodontic appliance.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the first orthodontic appliance is removable.
6. The system of claim 1, further comprising the second orthodontic appliance, wherein the at least two sensor emitters are on or in the second orthodontic appliance.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein the first orthodontic appliance comprises a first mandibular repositioning feature and the second orthodontic appliance comprises a second mandibular repositioning feature, wherein the processor is configured to determine the relative position, orientation or position and orientation between the first and second mandibular repositioning features.
8. The system of claim 1, further comprising wireless communication electronics disposed on or within the first orthodontic appliance, the wireless communication electronics being configured to transfer the sensor data to the at least one processor.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein the first orthodontic appliance comprises a polymeric shell having a plurality of the teeth-receiving cavities.
10. The system of claim 1, further comprising a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium configured to store the sensor data.
11. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is configured to indicate that the first orthodontic appliance is deformed.
12. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is configured to indicate that the first orthodontic appliance has a defect.
13. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is configured to indicate that the at least two sensor emitters are in close proximity to the corresponding at least two sensor receivers.
14. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is configured to indicate that the first orthodontic appliance is applying a force to the patient's teeth.
15. The system of claim 1, wherein the first orthodontic appliance comprises a palatal expander, the palatal expander including a palatal region coupled to the teeth-receiving cavities and configured to apply a force laterally across the patent's palate.
16. The system of claim 1, wherein the first orthodontic appliance comprises a dental aligner configured to resiliently reposition one or more of the patient's teeth.
17. The system of claim 1, wherein each of the at least two sensors is configured to detect contact or proximity with a tooth received in a corresponding cavity of the first orthodontic appliance.
18. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least two sensor receivers are disposed on or in different tooth receiving cavities of the first orthodontic appliance.
19. An orthodontic appliance system, the system comprising: an orthodontic appliance having teeth-receiving cavities shaped to receive a patient's teeth;at least two sensor emitters disposed on or in the orthodontic appliance;at least two sensor receivers disposed on or in different teeth-receiving cavities of the orthodontic appliance, wherein each of the at least two sensor receivers is configured to detect a signal from a corresponding sensor emitter of the at least two sensor emitters; andat least one processor configured to receive sensor data from the sensor receiver and to determine a relative position, orientation or position and orientation between the at least two sensor receivers and the at least two sensor emitters.
20. The system of claim 19, wherein the at least two sensor emitters and the at least two sensor receivers are combined emitters/receivers.
21. The system of claim 19, wherein the at least two sensor emitters are disposed on or in different tooth receiving cavities of the orthodontic appliance.
22. The system of claim 19, wherein each of the at least two sensor emitters or each of the at least two sensor receivers is configured to detect contact or proximity with a tooth received in a corresponding cavity of the orthodontic appliance.
23. The system of claim 19, wherein the orthodontic appliance comprises a dental aligner configured to resiliently reposition one or more of the patient's teeth.
24. The system of claim 19, wherein the at least one processor is disposed on or within the orthodontic appliance.
25. An orthodontic device, comprising: an intraoral appliance having teeth-receiving cavities shaped to receive and reposition a patient's teeth;a first sensor disposed on or in a first cavity of the teeth-receiving cavities of the intraoral appliance;a second sensor disposed on or in a second cavity of the teeth-receiving cavities of the intraoral appliance; andat least one processor configured to receive sensor data from the first and second sensors and to indicate of a state of the orthodontic device based on the sensor data.
26. The device of claim 25, wherein the first and second sensors comprise one or more of: a capacitive sensor, a magnetic sensor, a force sensor, a pressure sensor, and an optical sensor.
27. The device of claim 25, wherein the at least one processor is disposed on or within the intraoral appliance.
28. The device of claim 25, wherein the first sensor is configured to detect contact or proximity with a first tooth received in the first cavity, and wherein the second sensor is configured to detect contact or proximity with a second tooth received in the first cavity.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/593,241, filed Nov. 30, 2017, titled “SENSORS FOR MONITORING ORAL APPLIANCES,” which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (1075)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
2171695	Harper	Sep 1939	A
2194790	Gluck	Mar 1940	A
2467432	Kesling	Apr 1949	A
2531222	Kesling	Nov 1950	A
3089487	Enicks et al.	May 1963	A
3092907	Traiger	Jun 1963	A
3178820	Kesling	Apr 1965	A
3211143	Grossberg	Oct 1965	A
3379193	Monsghan	Apr 1968	A
3385291	Martin	May 1968	A
3407500	Kesling	Oct 1968	A
3478742	Bohlmann	Nov 1969	A
3496936	Gores	Feb 1970	A
3533163	Kirschenbaum	Oct 1970	A
3556093	Quick	Jan 1971	A
3600808	Reeve	Aug 1971	A
3660900	Andrews	May 1972	A
3683502	Wallshein	Aug 1972	A
3724075	Kesling	Apr 1973	A
3738005	Cohen et al.	Jun 1973	A
3797115	Silverman et al.	Mar 1974	A
3860803	Levine	Jan 1975	A
3885310	Northcutt	May 1975	A
3916526	Schudy	Nov 1975	A
3922786	Lavin	Dec 1975	A
3949477	Cohen et al.	Apr 1976	A
3950851	Bergersen	Apr 1976	A
3955282	McNall	May 1976	A
3983628	Acevedo	Oct 1976	A
4014096	Dellinger	Mar 1977	A
4055895	Huge	Nov 1977	A
4094068	Schinhammer	Jun 1978	A
4117596	Wallshein	Oct 1978	A
4129946	Kennedy	Dec 1978	A
4134208	Pearlman	Jan 1979	A
4139944	Bergersen	Feb 1979	A
4179811	Hinz	Dec 1979	A
4179812	White	Dec 1979	A
4183141	Dellinger	Jan 1980	A
4195046	Kesling	Mar 1980	A
4204325	Kaelble	May 1980	A
4253828	Coles et al.	Mar 1981	A
4255138	Frohn	Mar 1981	A
4299568	Crowley	Nov 1981	A
4324546	Heitlinger et al.	Apr 1982	A
4324547	Arcan et al.	Apr 1982	A
4348178	Kurz	Sep 1982	A
4368040	Weissman	Jan 1983	A
4419992	Chorbajian	Dec 1983	A
4433956	Witzig	Feb 1984	A
4433960	Garito et al.	Feb 1984	A
4439154	Mayclin	Mar 1984	A
4449928	von Weissenfluh	May 1984	A
4478580	Barrut	Oct 1984	A
4500294	Lewis	Feb 1985	A
4505672	Kurz	Mar 1985	A
4505673	Yoshii	Mar 1985	A
4519386	Sullivan	May 1985	A
4523908	Drisaldi et al.	Jun 1985	A
4526540	Dellinger	Jul 1985	A
4553936	Wang	Nov 1985	A
4575330	Hull	Mar 1986	A
4575805	Moermann et al.	Mar 1986	A
4591341	Andrews	May 1986	A
4608021	Barrett	Aug 1986	A
4609349	Cain	Sep 1986	A
4611288	Duret et al.	Sep 1986	A
4629424	Lauks et al.	Dec 1986	A
4638145	Sakuma et al.	Jan 1987	A
4656860	Orthuber et al.	Apr 1987	A
4663720	Duret et al.	May 1987	A
4664626	Keeling	May 1987	A
4665621	Ackerman et al.	May 1987	A
4676747	Kesling	Jun 1987	A
4755139	Abbatte et al.	Jul 1988	A
4757824	Chaumet	Jul 1988	A
4763791	Halverson et al.	Aug 1988	A
4764111	Knierim	Aug 1988	A
4790752	Cheslak	Dec 1988	A
4793803	Martz	Dec 1988	A
4798534	Breads	Jan 1989	A
4830612	Bergersen	May 1989	A
4836778	Baumrind et al.	Jun 1989	A
4837732	Brandestini et al.	Jun 1989	A
4850864	Diamond	Jul 1989	A
4850865	Napolitano	Jul 1989	A
4856991	Breads et al.	Aug 1989	A
4877398	Kesling	Oct 1989	A
4880380	Martz	Nov 1989	A
4886451	Cetlin	Dec 1989	A
4889238	Batchelor	Dec 1989	A
4890608	Steer	Jan 1990	A
4932866	Guis	Jun 1990	A
4935635	O'Harra	Jun 1990	A
4936862	Walker et al.	Jun 1990	A
4937928	van der Zel	Jul 1990	A
4941826	Loran et al.	Jul 1990	A
4952928	Carroll et al.	Aug 1990	A
4964770	Steinbichler et al.	Oct 1990	A
4971557	Martin	Nov 1990	A
4975052	Spencer et al.	Dec 1990	A
4983334	Adell	Jan 1991	A
4997369	Shafir	Mar 1991	A
5002485	Aagesen	Mar 1991	A
5011405	Lemchen	Apr 1991	A
5015183	Fenick	May 1991	A
5017133	Miura	May 1991	A
5018969	Andreiko et al.	May 1991	A
5027281	Rekow et al.	Jun 1991	A
5035613	Breads et al.	Jul 1991	A
5037295	Bergersen	Aug 1991	A
5055039	Abbatte et al.	Oct 1991	A
5061839	Matsuno et al.	Oct 1991	A
5083919	Quachi	Jan 1992	A
5094614	Wildman	Mar 1992	A
5100316	Wildman	Mar 1992	A
5103838	Yousif	Apr 1992	A
5114339	Guis	May 1992	A
5121333	Riley et al.	Jun 1992	A
5123425	Shannon et al.	Jun 1992	A
5128870	Erdman et al.	Jul 1992	A
5130064	Smalley et al.	Jul 1992	A
5131843	Hilgers et al.	Jul 1992	A
5131844	Marinaccio et al.	Jul 1992	A
5139419	Andreiko et al.	Aug 1992	A
5145364	Martz et al.	Sep 1992	A
5176517	Truax	Jan 1993	A
5194003	Garay et al.	Mar 1993	A
5204670	Stinton	Apr 1993	A
5222499	Allen et al.	Jun 1993	A
5224049	Mushabac	Jun 1993	A
5238404	Andreiko	Aug 1993	A
5242304	Truax et al.	Sep 1993	A
5245592	Kuemmel et al.	Sep 1993	A
5273429	Rekow et al.	Dec 1993	A
5278756	Lemchen et al.	Jan 1994	A
5306144	Hibst et al.	Apr 1994	A
5314335	Fung	May 1994	A
5324186	Bakanowski	Jun 1994	A
5328362	Watson et al.	Jul 1994	A
5335657	Terry et al.	Aug 1994	A
5338198	Wu et al.	Aug 1994	A
5340309	Robertson	Aug 1994	A
5342202	Deshayes	Aug 1994	A
5344315	Hanson	Sep 1994	A
5368478	Andreiko et al.	Nov 1994	A
5372502	Massen et al.	Dec 1994	A
D354355	Hilgers	Jan 1995	S
5382164	Stern	Jan 1995	A
5395238	Andreiko et al.	Mar 1995	A
5415542	Kesling	May 1995	A
5431562	Andreiko et al.	Jul 1995	A
5440326	Quinn	Aug 1995	A
5440496	Andersson et al.	Aug 1995	A
5447432	Andreiko et al.	Sep 1995	A
5449703	Mitra et al.	Sep 1995	A
5452219	Dehoff et al.	Sep 1995	A
5454717	Andreiko et al.	Oct 1995	A
5456600	Andreiko et al.	Oct 1995	A
5474448	Andreiko et al.	Dec 1995	A
5487662	Kipke et al.	Jan 1996	A
RE35169	Lemchen et al.	Mar 1996	E
5499633	Fenton	Mar 1996	A
5522725	Jordan et al.	Jun 1996	A
5528735	Strasnick et al.	Jun 1996	A
5533895	Andreiko et al.	Jul 1996	A
5540732	Testerman	Jul 1996	A
5542842	Andreiko et al.	Aug 1996	A
5543780	McAuley et al.	Aug 1996	A
5549476	Stern	Aug 1996	A
5562448	Mushabac	Oct 1996	A
5570182	Nathel et al.	Oct 1996	A
5575655	Darnell	Nov 1996	A
5583977	Seidl	Dec 1996	A
5587912	Andersson et al.	Dec 1996	A
5588098	Chen et al.	Dec 1996	A
5605459	Kuroda et al.	Feb 1997	A
5607305	Andersson et al.	Mar 1997	A
5614075	Andre	Mar 1997	A
5621648	Crump	Apr 1997	A
5626537	Danyo et al.	May 1997	A
5636736	Jacobs et al.	Jun 1997	A
5645420	Bergersen	Jul 1997	A
5645421	Slootsky	Jul 1997	A
5651671	Seay et al.	Jul 1997	A
5655653	Chester	Aug 1997	A
5659420	Wakai et al.	Aug 1997	A
5683243	Andreiko et al.	Nov 1997	A
5683244	Truax	Nov 1997	A
5691539	Pfeiffer	Nov 1997	A
5692894	Schwartz et al.	Dec 1997	A
5711665	Adam et al.	Jan 1998	A
5711666	Hanson	Jan 1998	A
5725376	Poirier	Mar 1998	A
5725378	Wang	Mar 1998	A
5730151	Summer et al.	Mar 1998	A
5737084	Ishihara	Apr 1998	A
5740267	Echerer et al.	Apr 1998	A
5742700	Yoon et al.	Apr 1998	A
5769631	Williams	Jun 1998	A
5774425	Ivanov et al.	Jun 1998	A
5790242	Stern et al.	Aug 1998	A
5799100	Clarke et al.	Aug 1998	A
5800162	Shimodaira et al.	Sep 1998	A
5800174	Andersson	Sep 1998	A
5813854	Nikodem	Sep 1998	A
5816800	Brehm et al.	Oct 1998	A
5818587	Devaraj et al.	Oct 1998	A
5823778	Schmitt et al.	Oct 1998	A
5848115	Little et al.	Dec 1998	A
5857853	van Nifterick et al.	Jan 1999	A
5866058	Batchelder et al.	Feb 1999	A
5876199	Bergersen	Mar 1999	A
5879158	Doyle et al.	Mar 1999	A
5880961	Crump	Mar 1999	A
5880962	Andersson et al.	Mar 1999	A
5882192	Bergersen	Mar 1999	A
5886702	Migdal et al.	Mar 1999	A
5890896	Padial	Apr 1999	A
5904479	Staples	May 1999	A
5934288	Avila et al.	Aug 1999	A
5957686	Anthony	Sep 1999	A
5964587	Sato	Oct 1999	A
5971754	Sondhi et al.	Oct 1999	A
5975893	Chishti et al.	Nov 1999	A
5975906	Knutson	Nov 1999	A
5980246	Ramsay et al.	Nov 1999	A
5989023	Summer	Nov 1999	A
6002706	Staver et al.	Dec 1999	A
6018713	Coli et al.	Jan 2000	A
6044309	Honda	Mar 2000	A
6049743	Baba	Apr 2000	A
6053731	Heckenberger	Apr 2000	A
6068482	Snow	May 2000	A
6070140	Tran	May 2000	A
6099303	Gibbs et al.	Aug 2000	A
6099314	Kopelman et al.	Aug 2000	A
6102701	Engeron	Aug 2000	A
6120287	Chen	Sep 2000	A
6123544	Cleary	Sep 2000	A
6152731	Jordan et al.	Nov 2000	A
6154676	Levine	Nov 2000	A
6183248	Chishti et al.	Feb 2001	B1
6183249	Brennan et al.	Feb 2001	B1
6186780	Hibst et al.	Feb 2001	B1
6190165	Andreiko et al.	Feb 2001	B1
6200133	Kittelsen	Mar 2001	B1
6201880	Elbaum et al.	Mar 2001	B1
6210162	Chishti et al.	Apr 2001	B1
6212435	Lattner et al.	Apr 2001	B1
6213767	Dixon et al.	Apr 2001	B1
6217334	Hultgren	Apr 2001	B1
6227850	Chishti et al.	May 2001	B1
6231338	de Josselin de Jong et al.	May 2001	B1
6239705	Glen	May 2001	B1
6243601	Wist	Jun 2001	B1
6263234	Engelhardt et al.	Jul 2001	B1
6283761	Joao	Sep 2001	B1
6288138	Yamamoto	Sep 2001	B1
6299438	Sahagian et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6309215	Phan et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6313432	Nagata et al.	Nov 2001	B1
6315553	Sachdeva et al.	Nov 2001	B1
6328745	Ascherman	Dec 2001	B1
6332774	Chikami	Dec 2001	B1
6334073	Levine	Dec 2001	B1
6350120	Sachdeva et al.	Feb 2002	B1
6364660	Durbin et al.	Apr 2002	B1
6382975	Poirier	May 2002	B1
6386878	Pavlovskaia et al.	May 2002	B1
6394802	Hahn	May 2002	B1
6402510	Williams	Jun 2002	B1
6402707	Ernst	Jun 2002	B1
6405729	Thornton	Jun 2002	B1
6406292	Chishti et al.	Jun 2002	B1
6409504	Jones et al.	Jun 2002	B1
6413086	Womack	Jul 2002	B1
6414264	von Falkenhausen	Jul 2002	B1
6414708	Carmeli et al.	Jul 2002	B1
6435871	Inman	Aug 2002	B1
6436058	Krahner et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6441354	Seghatol et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6450167	David et al.	Sep 2002	B1
6450807	Chishti et al.	Sep 2002	B1
6462301	Scott et al.	Oct 2002	B1
6470338	Rizzo et al.	Oct 2002	B1
6471511	Chishti et al.	Oct 2002	B1
6471512	Sachdeva et al.	Oct 2002	B1
6471970	Fanara et al.	Oct 2002	B1
6482002	Jordan et al.	Nov 2002	B2
6482298	Bhatnagar	Nov 2002	B1
6496814	Busche	Dec 2002	B1
6496816	Thiesson et al.	Dec 2002	B1
6499026	Rivette et al.	Dec 2002	B1
6499995	Schwartz	Dec 2002	B1
6507832	Evans et al.	Jan 2003	B1
6514074	Chishti et al.	Feb 2003	B1
6515593	Stark et al.	Feb 2003	B1
6516288	Bagne	Feb 2003	B2
6516805	Thornton	Feb 2003	B1
6520772	Williams	Feb 2003	B2
6523009	Wilkins	Feb 2003	B1
6523019	Borthwick	Feb 2003	B1
6524101	Phan et al.	Feb 2003	B1
6526168	Ornes et al.	Feb 2003	B1
6526982	Strong	Mar 2003	B1
6529891	Heckerman	Mar 2003	B1
6529902	Kanevsky et al.	Mar 2003	B1
6532455	Martin et al.	Mar 2003	B1
6535865	Skaaning et al.	Mar 2003	B1
6540512	Sachdeva et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6540707	Stark et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6542593	Amuah	Apr 2003	B1
6542881	Meidan et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6542894	Lee et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6542903	Hull et al.	Apr 2003	B2
6551243	Bocionek et al.	Apr 2003	B2
6554837	Hauri et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6556659	Bowman Amuah	Apr 2003	B1
6556977	Lapointe et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6560592	Reid et al.	May 2003	B1
6564209	Dempski et al.	May 2003	B1
6567814	Bankier et al.	May 2003	B1
6571227	Agrafiotis et al.	May 2003	B1
6572372	Phan et al.	Jun 2003	B1
6573998	Sabban	Jun 2003	B2
6574561	Alexander et al.	Jun 2003	B2
6578003	Camarda et al.	Jun 2003	B1
6580948	Haupert et al.	Jun 2003	B2
6587529	Staszewski et al.	Jul 2003	B1
6587828	Sachdeva	Jul 2003	B1
6592368	Weathers	Jul 2003	B1
6594539	Geng	Jul 2003	B1
6595342	Maritzen et al.	Jul 2003	B1
6597934	de Jong et al.	Jul 2003	B1
6598043	Baclawski	Jul 2003	B1
6599250	Webb et al.	Jul 2003	B2
6602070	Miller et al.	Aug 2003	B2
6604527	Palmisano	Aug 2003	B1
6606744	Mikurak	Aug 2003	B1
6607382	Kuo et al.	Aug 2003	B1
6611783	Kelly et al.	Aug 2003	B2
6611867	Bowman Amuah	Aug 2003	B1
6613001	Dworkin	Sep 2003	B1
6615158	Wenzel et al.	Sep 2003	B2
6616447	Rizoiu et al.	Sep 2003	B1
6616579	Reinbold et al.	Sep 2003	B1
6621491	Baumrind et al.	Sep 2003	B1
6623698	Kuo	Sep 2003	B2
6624752	Klitsgaard et al.	Sep 2003	B2
6626180	Kittelsen et al.	Sep 2003	B1
6626569	Reinstein et al.	Sep 2003	B2
6626669	Zegarelli	Sep 2003	B2
6633772	Ford et al.	Oct 2003	B2
6640128	Vilsmeier et al.	Oct 2003	B2
6643646	Su et al.	Nov 2003	B2
6647383	August et al.	Nov 2003	B1
6650944	Goedeke et al.	Nov 2003	B2
6671818	Mikurak	Dec 2003	B1
6675104	Paulse et al.	Jan 2004	B2
6678669	Lapointe et al.	Jan 2004	B2
6682346	Chishti et al.	Jan 2004	B2
6685469	Chishti et al.	Feb 2004	B2
6689055	Mullen et al.	Feb 2004	B1
6690761	Lang et al.	Feb 2004	B2
6691110	Wang et al.	Feb 2004	B2
6694234	Lockwood et al.	Feb 2004	B2
6697164	Babayoff et al.	Feb 2004	B1
6697793	McGreevy	Feb 2004	B2
6702765	Robbins et al.	Mar 2004	B2
6702804	Ritter et al.	Mar 2004	B1
6705863	Phan et al.	Mar 2004	B2
6729876	Chishti et al.	May 2004	B2
6733289	Manemann et al.	May 2004	B2
6736638	Sachdeva et al.	May 2004	B1
6739869	Taub et al.	May 2004	B1
6744932	Rubbert et al.	Jun 2004	B1
6749414	Hanson et al.	Jun 2004	B1
6769913	Hurson	Aug 2004	B2
6772026	Bradbury et al.	Aug 2004	B2
6790036	Graham	Sep 2004	B2
6802713	Chishti et al.	Oct 2004	B1
6814574	Abolfathi et al.	Nov 2004	B2
6830450	Knopp et al.	Dec 2004	B2
6832912	Mao	Dec 2004	B2
6832914	Bonnet et al.	Dec 2004	B1
6843370	Tuneberg	Jan 2005	B2
6845175	Kopelman et al.	Jan 2005	B2
6885464	Pfeiffer et al.	Apr 2005	B1
6890285	Rahman et al.	May 2005	B2
6951254	Morrison	Oct 2005	B2
6976841	Osterwalder	Dec 2005	B1
6978268	Thomas et al.	Dec 2005	B2
6983752	Garabadian	Jan 2006	B2
6984128	Breining et al.	Jan 2006	B2
6988893	Haywood	Jan 2006	B2
7016952	Mullen et al.	Mar 2006	B2
7020963	Cleary et al.	Apr 2006	B2
7036514	Heck	May 2006	B2
7040896	Pavlovskaia et al.	May 2006	B2
7106233	Schroeder et al.	Sep 2006	B2
7112065	Kopelman et al.	Sep 2006	B2
7121825	Chishti et al.	Oct 2006	B2
7134874	Chishti et al.	Nov 2006	B2
7137812	Cleary et al.	Nov 2006	B2
7138640	Delgado et al.	Nov 2006	B1
7140877	Kaza	Nov 2006	B2
7142312	Quadling et al.	Nov 2006	B2
7155373	Jordan et al.	Dec 2006	B2
7156655	Sachdeva et al.	Jan 2007	B2
7156661	Choi et al.	Jan 2007	B2
7166063	Rahman et al.	Jan 2007	B2
7184150	Quadling et al.	Feb 2007	B2
7191451	Nakagawa	Mar 2007	B2
7192273	McSurdy	Mar 2007	B2
7217131	Vuillemot	May 2007	B2
7220122	Chishti	May 2007	B2
7220124	Taub et al.	May 2007	B2
7229282	Andreiko et al.	Jun 2007	B2
7234937	Sachdeva et al.	Jun 2007	B2
7241142	Abolfathi et al.	Jul 2007	B2
7244230	Duggirala et al.	Jul 2007	B2
7245753	Squilla et al.	Jul 2007	B2
7257136	Mori et al.	Aug 2007	B2
7286954	Kopelman et al.	Oct 2007	B2
7292759	Boutoussov et al.	Nov 2007	B2
7294141	Bergersen	Nov 2007	B2
7302842	Biester et al.	Dec 2007	B2
7320592	Chishti et al.	Jan 2008	B2
7328706	Barach et al.	Feb 2008	B2
7329122	Scott	Feb 2008	B1
7338327	Sticker et al.	Mar 2008	B2
D565509	Fechner et al.	Apr 2008	S
7351116	Dold	Apr 2008	B2
7354270	Abolfathi et al.	Apr 2008	B2
7357637	Liechtung	Apr 2008	B2
7435083	Chishti et al.	Oct 2008	B2
7450231	Johs et al.	Nov 2008	B2
7458810	Bergersen	Dec 2008	B2
7460230	Johs et al.	Dec 2008	B2
7462076	Walter et al.	Dec 2008	B2
7463929	Simmons	Dec 2008	B2
7476100	Kuo	Jan 2009	B2
7500851	Williams	Mar 2009	B2
D594413	Palka et al.	Jun 2009	S
7543511	Kimura et al.	Jun 2009	B2
7544103	Walter et al.	Jun 2009	B2
7553157	Abolfathi et al.	Jun 2009	B2
7561273	Stautmeister et al.	Jul 2009	B2
7577284	Wong et al.	Aug 2009	B2
7596253	Wong et al.	Sep 2009	B2
7597594	Stadler et al.	Oct 2009	B2
7609875	Liu et al.	Oct 2009	B2
D603796	Sticker et al.	Nov 2009	S
7616319	Woollam et al.	Nov 2009	B1
7626705	Altendorf	Dec 2009	B2
7632216	Rahman et al.	Dec 2009	B2
7633625	Woollam et al.	Dec 2009	B1
7637262	Bailey	Dec 2009	B2
7637740	Knopp	Dec 2009	B2
7641473	Sporbert et al.	Jan 2010	B2
7668355	Wong et al.	Feb 2010	B2
7670179	Muller	Mar 2010	B2
7695327	Bauerle et al.	Apr 2010	B2
7698068	Babayoff	Apr 2010	B2
7711447	Lu et al.	May 2010	B2
7724378	Babayoff	May 2010	B2
D618619	Walter	Jun 2010	S
7728848	Petrov et al.	Jun 2010	B2
7731508	Borst	Jun 2010	B2
7735217	Borst	Jun 2010	B2
7740476	Rubbert et al.	Jun 2010	B2
7744369	Imgrund et al.	Jun 2010	B2
7746339	Matov et al.	Jun 2010	B2
7780460	Walter	Aug 2010	B2
7787132	Kbrner et al.	Aug 2010	B2
7791810	Powell	Sep 2010	B2
7796243	Choo-Smith et al.	Sep 2010	B2
7806687	Minagi et al.	Oct 2010	B2
7806727	Dold et al.	Oct 2010	B2
7813787	de Josselin de Jong et al.	Oct 2010	B2
7824180	Abolfathi et al.	Nov 2010	B2
7828601	Pyczak	Nov 2010	B2
7841464	Cinader et al.	Nov 2010	B2
7845969	Stadler et al.	Dec 2010	B2
7854609	Chen et al.	Dec 2010	B2
7862336	Kopelman et al.	Jan 2011	B2
7869983	Raby et al.	Jan 2011	B2
7872760	Ertl	Jan 2011	B2
7874836	McSurdy, Jr.	Jan 2011	B2
7874837	Chishti et al.	Jan 2011	B2
7874849	Sticker et al.	Jan 2011	B2
7878801	Abolfathi et al.	Feb 2011	B2
7878805	Moss et al.	Feb 2011	B2
7880751	Kuo et al.	Feb 2011	B2
7892474	Shkolnik et al.	Feb 2011	B2
7904308	Arnone et al.	Mar 2011	B2
7907280	Johs et al.	Mar 2011	B2
7929151	Liang et al.	Apr 2011	B2
7930189	Kuo	Apr 2011	B2
7947508	Tricca et al.	May 2011	B2
7959308	Freeman et al.	Jun 2011	B2
7963766	Cronauer	Jun 2011	B2
7970627	Kuo et al.	Jun 2011	B2
7985414	Knaack et al.	Jul 2011	B2
7986415	Thiel et al.	Jul 2011	B2
7987099	Kuo et al.	Jul 2011	B2
7991485	Zakim	Aug 2011	B2
8017891	Nevin	Sep 2011	B2
8026916	Wen	Sep 2011	B2
8027709	Arnone et al.	Sep 2011	B2
8029277	Imgrund et al.	Oct 2011	B2
8038444	Kitching et al.	Oct 2011	B2
8045772	Kosuge et al.	Oct 2011	B2
8054556	Chen et al.	Nov 2011	B2
8070490	Roetzer et al.	Dec 2011	B1
8075306	Kitching et al.	Dec 2011	B2
8077949	Liang et al.	Dec 2011	B2
8083556	Stadler et al.	Dec 2011	B2
D652799	Mueller	Jan 2012	S
8092215	Stone-Collonge et al.	Jan 2012	B2
8095383	Arnone et al.	Jan 2012	B2
8099268	Kitching et al.	Jan 2012	B2
8099305	Kuo et al.	Jan 2012	B2
8118592	Tortorici	Feb 2012	B2
8126025	Takeda	Feb 2012	B2
8136529	Kelly	Mar 2012	B2
8144954	Quadling et al.	Mar 2012	B2
8160334	Thiel et al.	Apr 2012	B2
8172569	Matty et al.	May 2012	B2
8197252	Harrison	Jun 2012	B1
8201560	Dembro	Jun 2012	B2
8215312	Garabadian et al.	Jul 2012	B2
8240018	Walter et al.	Aug 2012	B2
8275180	Kuo	Sep 2012	B2
8279450	Oota et al.	Oct 2012	B2
8292617	Brandt et al.	Oct 2012	B2
8294657	Kim et al.	Oct 2012	B2
8296952	Greenberg	Oct 2012	B2
8297286	Smernoff	Oct 2012	B2
8306608	Mandelis et al.	Nov 2012	B2
8314764	Kim et al.	Nov 2012	B2
8332015	Ertl	Dec 2012	B2
8354588	Sticker et al.	Jan 2013	B2
8366479	Borst et al.	Feb 2013	B2
8401826	Cheng et al.	Mar 2013	B2
8419428	Lawrence	Apr 2013	B2
8433083	Abolfathi et al.	Apr 2013	B2
8439672	Matov et al.	May 2013	B2
8465280	Sachdeva et al.	Jun 2013	B2
8477320	Stock et al.	Jul 2013	B2
8488113	Thiel et al.	Jul 2013	B2
8517726	Kakavand et al.	Aug 2013	B2
8520922	Wang et al.	Aug 2013	B2
8520925	Duret et al.	Aug 2013	B2
8523565	Matty et al.	Sep 2013	B2
8545221	Stone-Collonge et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8556625	Lovely	Oct 2013	B2
8570530	Liang	Oct 2013	B2
8573224	Thornton	Nov 2013	B2
8577212	Thiel	Nov 2013	B2
8601925	Coto	Dec 2013	B1
8639477	Chelnokov et al.	Jan 2014	B2
8650586	Lee et al.	Feb 2014	B2
8675706	Seurin et al.	Mar 2014	B2
8723029	Pyczak et al.	May 2014	B2
8738394	Kuo	May 2014	B2
8743923	Geske et al.	Jun 2014	B2
8753114	Vuillemot	Jun 2014	B2
8767270	Curry et al.	Jul 2014	B2
8768016	Pan et al.	Jul 2014	B2
8771149	Rahman	Jul 2014	B2
8839476	Adachi	Sep 2014	B2
8843381	Kuo et al.	Sep 2014	B2
8856053	Mah	Oct 2014	B2
8870566	Bergersen	Oct 2014	B2
8874452	Kuo	Oct 2014	B2
8878905	Fisker et al.	Nov 2014	B2
8899976	Chen et al.	Dec 2014	B2
8936463	Mason et al.	Jan 2015	B2
8944812	Kou	Feb 2015	B2
8948482	Levin	Feb 2015	B2
8956058	Rösch	Feb 2015	B2
8992216	Karazivan	Mar 2015	B2
9004915	Moss et al.	Apr 2015	B2
9022792	Sticker et al.	May 2015	B2
9039418	Rubbert	May 2015	B1
9084535	Girkin et al.	Jul 2015	B2
9084657	Matty et al.	Jul 2015	B2
9108338	Sirovskiy et al.	Aug 2015	B2
9144512	Wagner	Sep 2015	B2
9192305	Levin	Nov 2015	B2
9204952	Lampalzer	Dec 2015	B2
9211166	Kuo et al.	Dec 2015	B2
9214014	Levin	Dec 2015	B2
9220580	Borovinskih et al.	Dec 2015	B2
9241774	Li et al.	Jan 2016	B2
9242118	Brawn	Jan 2016	B2
9261358	Atiya et al.	Feb 2016	B2
9277972	Brandt et al.	Mar 2016	B2
9336336	Deichmann et al.	May 2016	B2
9351810	Moon	May 2016	B2
9375300	Matov et al.	Jun 2016	B2
9403238	Culp	Aug 2016	B2
9408743	Wagner	Aug 2016	B1
9414897	Wu et al.	Aug 2016	B2
9433476	Khardekar et al.	Sep 2016	B2
9439568	Atiya et al.	Sep 2016	B2
9444981	Bellis et al.	Sep 2016	B2
9463287	Lorberbaum et al.	Oct 2016	B1
9492243	Kuo	Nov 2016	B2
9500635	Islam	Nov 2016	B2
9506808	Jeon et al.	Nov 2016	B2
9510918	Sanchez	Dec 2016	B2
9545331	Ingemarsson-Matzen	Jan 2017	B2
9566132	Stone-Collonge et al.	Feb 2017	B2
9584771	Mandells et al.	Feb 2017	B2
9589329	Levin	Mar 2017	B2
9675427	Kopelman	Jun 2017	B2
9675430	Verker et al.	Jun 2017	B2
9693839	Atiya et al.	Jul 2017	B2
9730769	Chen et al.	Aug 2017	B2
9744006	Ross	Aug 2017	B2
9820829	Kuo	Nov 2017	B2
9830688	Levin	Nov 2017	B2
9844421	Moss et al.	Dec 2017	B2
9848985	Yang et al.	Dec 2017	B2
9861451	Davis	Jan 2018	B1
9936186	Jesenko et al.	Apr 2018	B2
10123706	Elbaz et al.	Nov 2018	B2
10123853	Moss et al.	Nov 2018	B2
10154889	Chen et al.	Dec 2018	B2
10159541	Bindayel	Dec 2018	B2
10172693	Brandt et al.	Jan 2019	B2
10195690	Culp	Feb 2019	B2
10231801	Korytov et al.	Mar 2019	B2
10238472	Levin	Mar 2019	B2
10258432	Webber	Apr 2019	B2
20010002310	Chishti et al.	May 2001	A1
20010032100	Mahmud et al.	Oct 2001	A1
20010038705	Rubbert et al.	Nov 2001	A1
20010041320	Phan et al.	Nov 2001	A1
20020004727	Knaus et al.	Jan 2002	A1
20020007284	Schurenberg et al.	Jan 2002	A1
20020010568	Rubbert et al.	Jan 2002	A1
20020015934	Rubbert et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020025503	Chapoulaud et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020026105	Drazen	Feb 2002	A1
20020028417	Chapoulaud et al.	Mar 2002	A1
20020035572	Takatori et al.	Mar 2002	A1
20020064752	Durbin et al.	May 2002	A1
20020064759	Durbin et al.	May 2002	A1
20020087551	Hickey et al.	Jul 2002	A1
20020107853	Hofmann et al.	Aug 2002	A1
20020188478	Breeland et al.	Dec 2002	A1
20020192617	Phan et al.	Dec 2002	A1
20030000927	Kanaya et al.	Jan 2003	A1
20030009252	Pavlovskaia et al.	Jan 2003	A1
20030019848	Nicholas et al.	Jan 2003	A1
20030021453	Weise et al.	Jan 2003	A1
20030035061	Iwaki et al.	Feb 2003	A1
20030049581	Deluke	Mar 2003	A1
20030057192	Patel	Mar 2003	A1
20030059736	Lai et al.	Mar 2003	A1
20030060532	Subelka et al.	Mar 2003	A1
20030068598	Vallittu et al.	Apr 2003	A1
20030095697	Wood et al.	May 2003	A1
20030101079	McLaughlin	May 2003	A1
20030103060	Anderson et al.	Jun 2003	A1
20030120517	Eida et al.	Jun 2003	A1
20030139834	Nikolskiy et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030144886	Taira	Jul 2003	A1
20030172043	Guyon et al.	Sep 2003	A1
20030190575	Hilliard	Oct 2003	A1
20030192867	Yamazaki et al.	Oct 2003	A1
20030207224	Lotte	Nov 2003	A1
20030215764	Kopelman et al.	Nov 2003	A1
20030224311	Cronauer	Dec 2003	A1
20030224313	Bergersen	Dec 2003	A1
20030224314	Bergersen	Dec 2003	A1
20040002873	Sachdeva	Jan 2004	A1
20040009449	Mah et al.	Jan 2004	A1
20040013994	Goldberg et al.	Jan 2004	A1
20040019262	Perelgut	Jan 2004	A1
20040029078	Marshall	Feb 2004	A1
20040038168	Choi et al.	Feb 2004	A1
20040054304	Raby	Mar 2004	A1
20040054358	Cox et al.	Mar 2004	A1
20040058295	Bergersen	Mar 2004	A1
20040068199	Echauz et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040078222	Khan et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040080621	Fisher et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040094165	Cook	May 2004	A1
20040107118	Harnsberger et al.	Jun 2004	A1
20040133083	Comaniciu et al.	Jul 2004	A1
20040152036	Abolfathi	Aug 2004	A1
20040158194	Wolff et al.	Aug 2004	A1
20040166463	Wen et al.	Aug 2004	A1
20040167646	Jelonek et al.	Aug 2004	A1
20040170941	Phan et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040193036	Zhou et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040197728	Abolfathi et al.	Oct 2004	A1
20040214128	Sachdeva et al.	Oct 2004	A1
20040219479	Malin et al.	Nov 2004	A1
20040220691	Hofmeister et al.	Nov 2004	A1
20040229185	Knopp	Nov 2004	A1
20040259049	Kopelman et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20050003318	Choi et al.	Jan 2005	A1
20050023356	Wiklof et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050031196	Moghaddam et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050037312	Uchida	Feb 2005	A1
20050038669	Sachdeva et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050040551	Biegler et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050042569	Plan et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050042577	Kvitrud et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050048433	Hilliard	Mar 2005	A1
20050074717	Cleary et al.	Apr 2005	A1
20050089822	Geng	Apr 2005	A1
20050100333	Kerschbaumer et al.	May 2005	A1
20050108052	Omaboe	May 2005	A1
20050131738	Morris	Jun 2005	A1
20050144150	Ramamurthy et al.	Jun 2005	A1
20050171594	Machan et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050171630	Dinauer et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050181333	Karazivan et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050186524	Abolfathi et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050186526	Stewart et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050216314	Secor	Sep 2005	A1
20050233276	Kopelman et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050239013	Sachdeva	Oct 2005	A1
20050244781	Abels et al.	Nov 2005	A1
20050244791	Davis et al.	Nov 2005	A1
20050271996	Sporbert et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20060056670	Hamadeh	Mar 2006	A1
20060057533	McGann	Mar 2006	A1
20060063135	Mehl	Mar 2006	A1
20060078842	Sachdeva et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060084024	Farrell	Apr 2006	A1
20060093982	Wen	May 2006	A1
20060098007	Rouet et al.	May 2006	A1
20060099545	Lia et al.	May 2006	A1
20060099546	Bergersen	May 2006	A1
20060110698	Robson	May 2006	A1
20060111631	Kelliher et al.	May 2006	A1
20060115785	Li et al.	Jun 2006	A1
20060137813	Robrecht et al.	Jun 2006	A1
20060147872	Andreiko	Jul 2006	A1
20060154198	Durbin et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060154207	Kuo	Jul 2006	A1
20060173715	Wang	Aug 2006	A1
20060183082	Quadling et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060188834	Hilliard	Aug 2006	A1
20060188848	Tricca et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060194163	Tricca et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060199153	Liu et al.	Sep 2006	A1
20060204078	Orth et al.	Sep 2006	A1
20060223022	Solomon	Oct 2006	A1
20060223023	Lai et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060223032	Fried et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060223342	Borst et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060234179	Wen et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060257815	De Dominicis	Nov 2006	A1
20060275729	Fornoff	Dec 2006	A1
20060275731	Wen et al.	Dec 2006	A1
20060275736	Wen et al.	Dec 2006	A1
20060277075	Salwan	Dec 2006	A1
20060290693	Zhou et al.	Dec 2006	A1
20060292520	Dillon et al.	Dec 2006	A1
20070031775	Andreiko	Feb 2007	A1
20070046865	Umeda et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070053048	Kumar et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070054237	Neuschafer	Mar 2007	A1
20070065768	Nadav	Mar 2007	A1
20070087300	Willison et al.	Apr 2007	A1
20070087302	Reising et al.	Apr 2007	A1
20070106138	Beiski et al.	May 2007	A1
20070122592	Anderson et al.	May 2007	A1
20070128574	Kuo et al.	Jun 2007	A1
20070141525	Cinader, Jr.	Jun 2007	A1
20070141526	Eisenberg et al.	Jun 2007	A1
20070143135	Lindquist et al.	Jun 2007	A1
20070168152	Matov et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20070172112	Paley et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20070172291	Yokoyama	Jul 2007	A1
20070178420	Keski-Nisula et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070183633	Hoffmann	Aug 2007	A1
20070184402	Boutoussov et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070185732	Hicks et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070192137	Ombrellaro	Aug 2007	A1
20070199929	Rippl et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070215582	Roeper et al.	Sep 2007	A1
20070218422	Ehrenfeld	Sep 2007	A1
20070231765	Phan et al.	Oct 2007	A1
20070238065	Sherwood et al.	Oct 2007	A1
20070239488	DeRosso	Oct 2007	A1
20070263226	Kurtz et al.	Nov 2007	A1
20080013727	Uemura	Jan 2008	A1
20080020350	Matov et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080045053	Stadler et al.	Feb 2008	A1
20080057461	Cheng et al.	Mar 2008	A1
20080057467	Gittelson	Mar 2008	A1
20080057479	Grenness	Mar 2008	A1
20080059238	Park et al.	Mar 2008	A1
20080090208	Rubbert	Apr 2008	A1
20080094389	Rouet et al.	Apr 2008	A1
20080113317	Kemp et al.	May 2008	A1
20080115791	Heine	May 2008	A1
20080118882	Su	May 2008	A1
20080118886	Liang et al.	May 2008	A1
20080141534	Hilliard	Jun 2008	A1
20080169122	Shiraishi et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080171934	Greenan et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080176448	Muller et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080233530	Cinader	Sep 2008	A1
20080242144	Dietz	Oct 2008	A1
20080248443	Chishti et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080254403	Hilliard	Oct 2008	A1
20080268400	Moss et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080306724	Kitching et al.	Dec 2008	A1
20090029310	Pumphrey et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090030290	Kozuch et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090030347	Cao	Jan 2009	A1
20090040740	Muller et al.	Feb 2009	A1
20090061379	Yamamoto et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090061381	Durbin et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090075228	Kumada et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090087050	Gandyra	Apr 2009	A1
20090098502	Andreiko	Apr 2009	A1
20090099445	Burger	Apr 2009	A1
20090103579	Ushimaru et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090105523	Kassayan et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090130620	Yazdi et al.	May 2009	A1
20090136890	Kang et al.	May 2009	A1
20090136893	Zegarelli	May 2009	A1
20090148809	Kuo et al.	Jun 2009	A1
20090170050	Marcus	Jul 2009	A1
20090181346	Orth	Jul 2009	A1
20090191502	Cao et al.	Jul 2009	A1
20090210032	Beiski et al.	Aug 2009	A1
20090218514	Klunder et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20090246726	Chelnokov et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090281433	Saadat et al.	Nov 2009	A1
20090286195	Sears et al.	Nov 2009	A1
20090298017	Boerjes et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20090305540	Stadler et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20090316966	Marshall et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20090317757	Lemchen	Dec 2009	A1
20100015565	Carrillo Gonzalez et al.	Jan 2010	A1
20100019170	Hart et al.	Jan 2010	A1
20100028825	Lemchen	Feb 2010	A1
20100045902	Ikeda et al.	Feb 2010	A1
20100062394	Jones et al.	Mar 2010	A1
20100068676	Mason et al.	Mar 2010	A1
20100086890	Kuo	Apr 2010	A1
20100138025	Morton et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100142789	Chang et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100145664	Hultgren et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100145898	Malfliet et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100152599	DuHamel et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100165275	Tsukamoto et al.	Jul 2010	A1
20100167225	Kuo	Jul 2010	A1
20100179789	Sachdeva et al.	Jul 2010	A1
20100193482	Ow et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100196837	Farrell	Aug 2010	A1
20100216085	Kopelman	Aug 2010	A1
20100217130	Weinlaender	Aug 2010	A1
20100231577	Kim et al.	Sep 2010	A1
20100268363	Karim et al.	Oct 2010	A1
20100268515	Vogt et al.	Oct 2010	A1
20100279243	Cinader et al.	Nov 2010	A1
20100280798	Pattijn	Nov 2010	A1
20100281370	Rohaly et al.	Nov 2010	A1
20100303316	Bullis et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20100312484	DuHamel et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20100327461	Co et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20110007920	Abolfathi et al.	Jan 2011	A1
20110012901	Kaplanyan	Jan 2011	A1
20110045428	Boltunov et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20110056350	Gale et al.	Mar 2011	A1
20110065060	Teixeira et al.	Mar 2011	A1
20110081625	Fuh	Apr 2011	A1
20110091832	Kim et al.	Apr 2011	A1
20110102549	Takahashi	May 2011	A1
20110102566	Zakian et al.	May 2011	A1
20110104630	Matov et al.	May 2011	A1
20110136072	Li et al.	Jun 2011	A1
20110136090	Kazemi	Jun 2011	A1
20110143300	Villaalba	Jun 2011	A1
20110143673	Landesman et al.	Jun 2011	A1
20110159452	Huang	Jun 2011	A1
20110164810	Zang et al.	Jul 2011	A1
20110207072	Schiemann	Aug 2011	A1
20110212420	Vuillemot	Sep 2011	A1
20110220623	Beutler	Sep 2011	A1
20110235045	Koerner et al.	Sep 2011	A1
20110269092	Kuo et al.	Nov 2011	A1
20110316994	Lemchen	Dec 2011	A1
20120028210	Hegyi et al.	Feb 2012	A1
20120029883	Heinz et al.	Feb 2012	A1
20120040311	Nilsson	Feb 2012	A1
20120064477	Schmitt	Mar 2012	A1
20120081786	Mizuyama et al.	Apr 2012	A1
20120086681	Kim et al.	Apr 2012	A1
20120115107	Adams	May 2012	A1
20120129117	McCance	May 2012	A1
20120147912	Moench et al.	Jun 2012	A1
20120150494	Anderson et al.	Jun 2012	A1
20120166213	Arnone et al.	Jun 2012	A1
20120172678	Logan et al.	Jul 2012	A1
20120281293	Gronenborn et al.	Nov 2012	A1
20120295216	Dykes et al.	Nov 2012	A1
20120322025	Ozawa et al.	Dec 2012	A1
20130029284	Teasdale	Jan 2013	A1
20130081272	Johnson et al.	Apr 2013	A1
20130089828	Borovinskih et al.	Apr 2013	A1
20130095446	Andreiko et al.	Apr 2013	A1
20130103176	Kopelman et al.	Apr 2013	A1
20130110469	Kopelman	May 2013	A1
20130140289	Baratier	Jun 2013	A1
20130150689	Shaw-Klein	Jun 2013	A1
20130163627	Seurin et al.	Jun 2013	A1
20130201488	Ishihara	Aug 2013	A1
20130204599	Matov et al.	Aug 2013	A1
20130209952	Kuo et al.	Aug 2013	A1
20130235165	Gharib et al.	Sep 2013	A1
20130252195	Popat	Sep 2013	A1
20130266326	Joseph et al.	Oct 2013	A1
20130278396	Kimmel	Oct 2013	A1
20130280671	Brawn et al.	Oct 2013	A1
20130286174	Urakabe	Oct 2013	A1
20130293824	Yoneyama et al.	Nov 2013	A1
20130323664	Parker	Dec 2013	A1
20130323671	Dillon et al.	Dec 2013	A1
20130323674	Hakomori et al.	Dec 2013	A1
20130325431	See et al.	Dec 2013	A1
20130337412	Kwon	Dec 2013	A1
20140061974	Tyler	Mar 2014	A1
20140081091	Abolfathi et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140093160	Porikli et al.	Apr 2014	A1
20140106289	Kozlowski	Apr 2014	A1
20140122027	Andreiko et al.	May 2014	A1
20140136222	Arnone et al.	May 2014	A1
20140142902	Chelnokov et al.	May 2014	A1
20140178829	Kim	Jun 2014	A1
20140265034	Dudley	Sep 2014	A1
20140272774	Dillon et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140280376	Kuo	Sep 2014	A1
20140294273	Jaisson	Oct 2014	A1
20140313299	Gebhardt et al.	Oct 2014	A1
20140329194	Sachdeva et al.	Nov 2014	A1
20140342301	Fleer et al.	Nov 2014	A1
20140350354	Stenzler et al.	Nov 2014	A1
20140363778	Parker	Dec 2014	A1
20150002649	Nowak et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150004553	Li et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150021210	Kesling	Jan 2015	A1
20150079531	Heine	Mar 2015	A1
20150094564	Tashman et al.	Apr 2015	A1
20150097315	DeSimone et al.	Apr 2015	A1
20150097316	DeSimone et al.	Apr 2015	A1
20150102532	DeSimone et al.	Apr 2015	A1
20150132708	Kuo	May 2015	A1
20150140502	Brawn et al.	May 2015	A1
20150150501	George	Jun 2015	A1
20150164335	Van Der Poel et al.	Jun 2015	A1
20150173856	Lowe et al.	Jun 2015	A1
20150182303	Abraham et al.	Jul 2015	A1
20150216626	Ranjbar	Aug 2015	A1
20150216716	Anitua Aldecoa	Aug 2015	A1
20150230885	Wucher	Aug 2015	A1
20150238280	Wu et al.	Aug 2015	A1
20150238283	Tanugula et al.	Aug 2015	A1
20150306486	Logan et al.	Oct 2015	A1
20150320320	Kopelman et al.	Nov 2015	A1
20150320532	Matty et al.	Nov 2015	A1
20150325044	Lebovitz	Nov 2015	A1
20150338209	Knuttel	Nov 2015	A1
20150351638	Amato	Dec 2015	A1
20150374469	Konno	Dec 2015	A1
20160000332	Atiya et al.	Jan 2016	A1
20160003610	Lampert et al.	Jan 2016	A1
20160022185	Agarwal et al.	Jan 2016	A1
20160042509	Andreiko et al.	Feb 2016	A1
20160051345	Levin	Feb 2016	A1
20160064898	Atiya et al.	Mar 2016	A1
20160067013	Morton et al.	Mar 2016	A1
20160081768	Kopelman et al.	Mar 2016	A1
20160081769	Kimura et al.	Mar 2016	A1
20160095668	Kuo et al.	Apr 2016	A1
20160100924	Wilson et al.	Apr 2016	A1
20160106520	Borovinskih et al.	Apr 2016	A1
20160120621	Li et al.	May 2016	A1
20160128624	Matt	May 2016	A1
20160135924	Choi et al.	May 2016	A1
20160135925	Mason et al.	May 2016	A1
20160163115	Furst	Jun 2016	A1
20160217708	Levin et al.	Jul 2016	A1
20160220105	Durent	Aug 2016	A1
20160220200	Sandholm et al.	Aug 2016	A1
20160225151	Cocco et al.	Aug 2016	A1
20160228213	Tod et al.	Aug 2016	A1
20160242871	Morton et al.	Aug 2016	A1
20160246936	Kahn	Aug 2016	A1
20160287358	Nowak et al.	Oct 2016	A1
20160296303	Parker	Oct 2016	A1
20160302885	Matov et al.	Oct 2016	A1
20160328843	Graham et al.	Nov 2016	A1
20160338799	Wu et al.	Nov 2016	A1
20160346063	Schulhof et al.	Dec 2016	A1
20160367188	Malik et al.	Dec 2016	A1
20160367339	Khardekar et al.	Dec 2016	A1
20170007365	Kopelman et al.	Jan 2017	A1
20170007366	Kopelman et al.	Jan 2017	A1
20170007367	Li et al.	Jan 2017	A1
20170007368	Boronkay	Jan 2017	A1
20170020633	Stone-Collonge et al.	Jan 2017	A1
20170049311	Borovinskih et al.	Feb 2017	A1
20170049326	Alfano et al.	Feb 2017	A1
20170056131	Alauddin	Mar 2017	A1
20170071705	Kuo	Mar 2017	A1
20170086943	Mah	Mar 2017	A1
20170100209	Wen	Apr 2017	A1
20170100212	Sherwood et al.	Apr 2017	A1
20170100213	Kuo	Apr 2017	A1
20170100214	Wen	Apr 2017	A1
20170105815	Matov et al.	Apr 2017	A1
20170128162	Dalla-Bona	May 2017	A1
20170135792	Webber	May 2017	A1
20170135793	Webber et al.	May 2017	A1
20170156821	Kopelman et al.	Jun 2017	A1
20170165032	Webber et al.	Jun 2017	A1
20170215739	Miyasato	Aug 2017	A1
20170251954	Lotan	Sep 2017	A1
20170252140	Murphy	Sep 2017	A1
20170258555	Kopelman	Sep 2017	A1
20170265970	Verker	Sep 2017	A1
20170319054	Miller et al.	Nov 2017	A1
20170319296	Webber et al.	Nov 2017	A1
20170325690	Salah et al.	Nov 2017	A1
20170340411	Akselrod	Nov 2017	A1
20170340415	Choi et al.	Nov 2017	A1
20180000563	Shanjani et al.	Jan 2018	A1
20180000565	Shanjani et al.	Jan 2018	A1
20180014924	Brawn	Jan 2018	A1
20180028064	Elbaz et al.	Feb 2018	A1
20180028065	Elbaz et al.	Feb 2018	A1
20180055420	Gassler	Mar 2018	A1
20180055602	Kopelman et al.	Mar 2018	A1
20180071054	Ha	Mar 2018	A1
20180071055	Kuo	Mar 2018	A1
20180078334	Lotan	Mar 2018	A1
20180085059	Lee	Mar 2018	A1
20180096465	Levin	Apr 2018	A1
20180125610	Carrier et al.	May 2018	A1
20180153648	Shanjani et al.	Jun 2018	A1
20180153649	Wu et al.	Jun 2018	A1
20180153733	Kuo	Jun 2018	A1
20180168788	Fernie	Jun 2018	A1
20180192877	Atiya et al.	Jul 2018	A1
20180228359	Meyer et al.	Aug 2018	A1
20180280118	Cramer	Oct 2018	A1
20180284727	Cramer et al.	Oct 2018	A1
20180318043	Li et al.	Nov 2018	A1
20180353264	Riley et al.	Dec 2018	A1
20180360567	Xue et al.	Dec 2018	A1
20180368944	Sato et al.	Dec 2018	A1
20180368961	Shanjani et al.	Dec 2018	A1
20190026599	Salah et al.	Jan 2019	A1
20190046296	Kopelman et al.	Feb 2019	A1
20190046297	Kopelman et al.	Feb 2019	A1
20190069975	Cam et al.	Mar 2019	A1
20190076216	Moss et al.	Mar 2019	A1
20190090983	Webber et al.	Mar 2019	A1
20190328313	Hanssen	Oct 2019	A1
20200093571	Shanjani	Mar 2020	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (131)

Number	Date	Country
517102	Nov 1977	AU
3031677	Nov 1977	AU
5598894	Jun 1994	AU
1121955	Apr 1982	CA
1655732	Aug 2005	CN
1655733	Aug 2005	CN
102017658	Apr 2011	CN
102715965	Oct 2012	CN
103889364	Jun 2014	CN
103961189	Aug 2014	CN
204092220	Jan 2015	CN
105496575	Apr 2016	CN
105997274	Oct 2016	CN
2749802	May 1978	DE
3526198	Feb 1986	DE
4207169	Sep 1993	DE
69327661	Jul 2000	DE
102005043627	Mar 2007	DE
202010017014	Mar 2011	DE
102011051443	Jan 2013	DE
202012011899	Jan 2013	DE
102014225457	Jun 2016	DE
0428152	May 1991	EP
490848	Jun 1992	EP
541500	May 1993	EP
714632	May 1997	EP
774933	Dec 2000	EP
731673	May 2001	EP
1941843	Jul 2008	EP
2437027	Apr 2012	EP
2447754	May 2012	EP
1989764	Jul 2012	EP
2332221	Nov 2012	EP
2596553	Dec 2013	EP
2612300	Feb 2015	EP
2848229	Mar 2015	EP
463897	Jan 1980	ES
2455066	Apr 2014	ES
2369828	Jun 1978	FR
2867377	Sep 2005	FR
2930334	Oct 2009	FR
1550777	Aug 1979	GB
53-058191	May 1978	JP
4028359	Jan 1992	JP
08-508174	Sep 1996	JP
09-19443	Jan 1997	JP
2003245289	Sep 2003	JP
2000339468	Sep 2004	JP
2005527320	Sep 2005	JP
2005527321	Sep 2005	JP
2006043121	Feb 2006	JP
2007151614	Jun 2007	JP
2007260158	Oct 2007	JP
2007537824	Dec 2007	JP
2008067732	Mar 2008	JP
2008523370	Jul 2008	JP
04184427	Nov 2008	JP
2009000412	Jan 2009	JP
2009018173	Jan 2009	JP
2009078133	Apr 2009	JP
2009101386	May 2009	JP
2009205330	Sep 2009	JP
2010017726	Jan 2010	JP
2011087733	May 2011	JP
2012045143	Mar 2012	JP
2013007645	Jan 2013	JP
2013192865	Sep 2013	JP
201735173	Feb 2017	JP
10-20020062793	Jul 2002	KR
10-20070108019	Nov 2007	KR
10-20090065778	Jun 2009	KR
10-1266966	May 2013	KR
10-2016-041632	Apr 2016	KR
10-2016-0071127	Jun 2016	KR
10-1675089	Nov 2016	KR
20170004401	Jan 2017	KR
480166	Mar 2002	TW
WO91004713	Apr 1991	WO
WO9203102	Mar 1992	WO
WO94010935	May 1994	WO
WO9623452	Aug 1996	WO
WO98032394	Jul 1998	WO
WO98044865	Oct 1998	WO
WO0108592	Feb 2001	WO
WO0185047	Nov 2001	WO
WO02017776	Mar 2002	WO
WO02062252	Aug 2002	WO
WO02095475	Nov 2002	WO
WO03003932	Jan 2003	WO
WO2006096558	Sep 2006	WO
WO2006100700	Sep 2006	WO
WO2006133548	Dec 2006	WO
WO2007019709	Feb 2007	WO
WO2007071341	Jun 2007	WO
WO2007103377	Sep 2007	WO
WO2008115654	Sep 2008	WO
WO2009016645	Feb 2009	WO
WO2009085752	Jul 2009	WO
WO2009089129	Jul 2009	WO
WO2009146788	Dec 2009	WO
WO2009146789	Dec 2009	WO
WO2010059988	May 2010	WO
WO2010123892	Oct 2010	WO
WO2012007003	Jan 2012	WO
WO2012064684	May 2012	WO
WO2012074304	Jun 2012	WO
WO2012078980	Jun 2012	WO
WO2012083968	Jun 2012	WO
WO2012140021	Oct 2012	WO
WO2013058879	Apr 2013	WO
WO2014068107	May 2014	WO
WO2014091865	Jun 2014	WO
WO2014143911	Sep 2014	WO
WO2015015289	Feb 2015	WO
WO2015063032	May 2015	WO
WO2015112638	Jul 2015	WO
WO2015176004	Nov 2015	WO
WO2016004415	Jan 2016	WO
WO2016042393	Mar 2016	WO
WO2016061279	Apr 2016	WO
WO2016084066	Jun 2016	WO
WO2016099471	Jun 2016	WO
WO2016113745	Jul 2016	WO
WO2016116874	Jul 2016	WO
WO2016200177	Dec 2016	WO
WO2017006176	Jan 2017	WO
WO2017182654	Oct 2017	WO
WO2018057547	Mar 2018	WO
WO2018085718	May 2018	WO
WO2018232113	Dec 2018	WO
WO2019018784	Jan 2019	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (281)

Entry
US 8,553,966 B1, 10/2013, Alpern et al. (withdrawn)
Farooq et al.; Relationship between tooth dimensions and malocclusion; JPMA: The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association; 64(6); pp. 670-674; Jun. 2014.
Newcombe; DTAM: Dense tracking and mapping in real-time; 8 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/7ajd/Publications/newcombe_etal_iccv2011.pdf; on Dec. 2011.
ormco.com; Increasing clinical performance with 3D interactive treatment planning and patient-specific appliances; 8 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://www.konsident.com/wp-content/files_mf/1295385693http_ormco.com_index_cmsfilesystemaction_fileOrmcoPDF_whitepapers.pdf) on Feb. 27, 2019.
Video of DICOM to Surgical Guides; Can be viewed at <URL:https://youtu.be/47KtOmCEFQk; Published Apr. 4, 2016.
Shanjani et al., U.S. Appl. No. 16/231,906 entitled “Augmented reality enhancements for dental practitioners.” Dec. 24, 2018.
Kopleman et al., U.S. Appl. No. 16/220,381 entitled “Closed loop adaptive orthodontic treatment methods and apparatuses,” Dec. 14, 2018.
Sabina et al., U.S. Appl. No. 16/258,516 entitled “Diagnostic intraoral scanning” filed Jan. 25, 2019.
Sabina et al., U.S. Appl. No. 16/258,523 entitled “Diagnostic intraoral tracking” filed Jan. 25, 2019.
Sabina et al., U.S. Appl. No. 16/258,527 entitled “Diagnostic intraoral methods and apparatuses” filed Jan. 25, 2019.
Li et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/171,159 entitled “Alternative bite adjustment structures,” filed Oct. 25, 2018.
Culp; U.S. Appl. No. 16/236,220 entitled “Laser cutting,” filed Dec. 28, 2018.
Culp; U.S. Appl. No. 16/265,287 entitled “Laser cutting,” filed Feb. 1, 2019.
Bernabe et al.; Are the lower incisors the best predictors for the unerupted canine and premolars sums? An analysis of peruvian sample; The Angle Orthodontist; 75(2); pp. 202-207; Mar. 2005.
Collins English Dictionary; Teeth (definition); 9 pages; retrieved from the internet (https:www.collinsdictionary.com/US/dictionary/english/teeth) on May 13, 2019.
Dental Monitoring; Basics: How to put the cheek retractor?; 1 page (Screenshot); retrieved from the interenet (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K1HXw4Kq3c); May 27, 2016.
Dental Monitoring; Dental monitoring tutorial; 1 page (Screenshot); retrieved from the internet (https:www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dbe3udOf9_c); Mar. 18, 2015.
dictionary.com; Plural (definition); 6 pages; retrieved from the internet ( https://www.diotionary.com/browse/plural#) on May 13, 2019.
dictionary.com; Quadrant (definition); 6 pages; retrieved from the internet ( https://www.dictionary.com/browse/quadrant?s=t) on May 13, 2019.
Ecligner Selfie; Change your smile; 1 page (screenshot); retrieved from the internet (https:play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=parklict.ecligner); on Feb. 13, 2018.
Martinelli et al.; Prediction of lower permanent canine and premolars width by correlation methods; The Angle Orthodontist; 75(5); pp. 805-808; Sep. 2005.
Nourallah et al.; New regression equations for prediciting the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary population; The Angle Orthodontist; 72(3); pp. 216-221; Jun. 2002.
Paredes et al.; A new, accurate and fast digital method to predict unerupted tooth size; The Angle Orthodontist; 76(1); pp. 14-19; Jan. 2006.
Sobral De Agular et al.; The gingival crevicular fluid as a source of biomarkers to enhance efficiency of orthodontic and functional treatment of growing patients; Bio. Med. Research International; vol. 2017; pp. 1-7; Article ID 3257235; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2017.
Levin; U.S. Appl. No. 16/282,431 entitled “Estimating a surface texture of a tooth,” filed Feb. 2, 2019.
Chen et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/223,019 entitled “Release agent receptacle,” filed Dec. 17, 2018.
AADR. American Association for Dental Research; Summary of Activities; Los Angeles, CA: p. 195; Mar. 20-23,(year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1980.
Alcaniz et aL; An Advanced System for the Simulation and Planning of Orthodontic Treatments; Karl Heinz Hohne and Ron Kikinis (eds.); Visualization in Biomedical Computing, 4th Intl. Conf, VBC '96, Hamburg, Germany; Springer-Verlag; pp. 511-520; Sep. 22-25, 1996.
Alexander et al.; The DigiGraph Work Station Part 2 Clinical Management; J. Clin. Orthod.; pp. 402-407; (Author Manuscript); Jul. 1990.
Align Technology; Align technology announces new teen solution with introduction of invisalign teen with mandibular advancement; 2 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://investor.aligntech.com/static-files/eb4fa6bb-3e62-404f-b74d-32059366a01b); Mar. 6, 2017.
ALLESEE Orthodontic Appliance: Important Tip About Wearing the Red White & Blue Active Clear Retainer System; Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab; 1 page; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date); 1998.
ALLESEE Orthodontic Appliances: DuraClearTM; Product information; 1 page; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1997.
ALLESEE Orthodontic Appliances; The Choice Is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment; ( product information for doctors); retrieved from the internet (http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/doctorhtml); 5 pages on May 19, 2003.
ALLESEE Orthodontic Appliances; The Choice Is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment; (product information), 6 pages; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2003.
ALLESEE Orthodontic Appliances; The Choice is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment;(Patient information); retrieved from the internet (http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/patients.html); 2 pages on May 19, 2003.
ALLESEE Orthodontic Appliances; The Red, White & Blue Way to Improve Your Smile; (information for patients), 2 pages; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1992.
Allesee Orthodontic Appliances; You may be a candidate for this invisible no-braces treatment; product information for patients; 2 pages; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2002.
Altschuler et al.; Analysis of 3-D Data for Comparative 3-D Serial Growth Pattern Studies of Oral-Facial Structures; AADR Abstracts, Program and Abstracts of Papers, 57th General Session, IADR Annual Session, Mar. 29, 1979 -Apr. 1, 1979, New Orleans Marriot; Journal of Dental Research; vol. 58, Special Issue A, p. 221; Jan. 1979.
Altschuler et al.; Laser Electro-Optic System for Rapid Three-Dimensional (3D) Topographic Mapping of Surfaces; Optical Engineering; 20(6); pp. 953-961; Dec. 1981.
Altschuler et al.; Measuring Surfaces Space-Coded by a Laser-Projected Dot Matrix; SPIE Imaging q Applications for Automated Industrial Inspection and Assembly; vol. 182; pp. 187-191; Oct. 10, 1979.
Altschuler; 3D Mapping of Maxillo-Facial Prosthesis; AADR Abstract #607; 2 pages total, (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1980.
Alves et al.; New trends in food allergens detection: toward biosensing strategies; Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition; 56(14); pp. 2304-2319; doi: 10.1080/10408398.2013.831026; Oct. 2016.
Andersson et al.; Clinical Results with Titanium Crowns Fabricated with Machine Duplication and Spark Erosion; Acta Odontologica Scandinavica; 47(5); pp. 279-286; Oct. 1989.
Andrews, The Six Keys to Optimal Occlusion Straight Wire, Chapter 3, L.A. Wells; pp. 13-24; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1989.
Bandodkar et al.; All-printed magnetically self-healing electrochemical devices; Science Advances; 2(11); 11 pages; e1601465; Nov. 2016.
Bandodkar et al.; Self-healing inks for autonomous repair of printable electrochemical devices; Advanced Electronic Materials; 1(12); 5 pages; 1500289; Dec. 2015.
Bandodkar et al.; Wearable biofuel cells: a review; Electroanalysis; 28 (6); pp. 1188-1200; Jun. 2016.
Bandodkar et al.; Wearable chemical sensors: present challenges and future prospects; Acs Sensors; 1(5); pp. 464-482; May 11, 2016.
Barone et al.; Creation of 3D multi-body orthodontic models by using independent imaging sensors; Sensors; 13(2); pp. 2033-2050; Feb. 5, 2013.
Bartels et al.; An Introduction to Splines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling; Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; pp. 422-425 Jan. 1, 1987.
Baumrind et al., “Mapping the Skull in 3-D,” reprinted from J. Calif. Dent. Assoc, 48(2), 11 pages; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) Fall Issue 1972.
Baumrind et al.; A Stereophotogrammetric System for the Detection of Prosthesis Loosening in Total Hip Arthroplasty; NATO Symposium on Applications of Human Biostereometrics; SPIE; vol. 166; pp. 112-123; Jul. 9-13, 1978.
Baumrind; A System for Cranio facial Mapping Through the Integration of Data from Stereo X-Ray Films and Stereo Photographs; an invited paper submitted to the 1975 American Society of Photogram Symposium on Close-Range Photogram Systems; University of Illinois; pp. 142-166; Aug. 26-30, 1975.
Baumrind; Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping: Background, Principles, and Perspectives; Seminars in Orthodontics; 7(4); pp. 223-232; Dec. 2001.
Begole et al.; A Computer System for the Analysis of Dental Casts; The Angle Orthodontist; 51(3); pp. 252-258; Jul. 1981.
Bernard et al.; Computerized Diagnosis in Orthodontics for Epidemiological Studies: A ProgressReport; (Abstract Only), J. Dental Res. Special Issue, vol. 67, p. 169, paper presented at International Association for Dental Research 66th General Session, Montreal Canada; Mar. 9-13, 1988.
Bhatia et al.; A Computer-Aided Design for Orthognathic Surgery; British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery; 22(4); pp. 237-253; Aug. 1, 1984.
Biggerstaff et al.; Computerized Analysis of Occlusion in the Postcanine Dentition; American Journal of Orthodontics; 61(3); pp. 245-254; Mar. 1972.
Biggerstaff; Computerized Diagnostic Setups and Simulations; Angle Orthodontist; 40(IP); pp. 28-36; Jan. 1970.
Biostar Operation & Training Manual. Great Lakes Orthodontics, Ltd. 199 Fire Tower Drive,Tonawanda, New York. 14150-5890, 20 pages; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1990.
Blu et al.; Linear interpolation revitalized; IEEE Transactions on Image Processing; 13(5); pp. 710-719; May 2004.
Bourke, Coordinate System Transformation; 1 page; retrived from the internet (http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/pbourke/prolection/coords) on Nov. 5, 2004; Jun. 1996.
Boyd et al.; Three Dimensional Diagnosis and Orthodontic Treatment of Complex Malocclusions With the Invisalipn Appliance; Seminars in Orthodontics; 7(4); pp. 274-293; Dec. 2001.
Brandestini et al.; Computer Machined Ceramic Inlays: In Vitro Marginal Adaptation; J. Dent. Res. Special Issue; (Abstract 305); vol. 64; p. 208; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1985.
Brook et al.; An Image Analysis System for the Determination of Tooth Dimensions from Study Casts: Comparison with Manual Measurements of Mesio-distal Diameter; Journal of Dental Research; 65(3); pp. 428-431; Mar. 1986.
Burstone et al.; Precision Adjustment of the Transpalatal Lingual Arch: Computer Arch Form Predetermination; American Journal of Orthodontics; 79(2);pp. 115-133; Feb. 1981.
Burstone; Dr. Charles J. Burstone on The Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 1); Journal of Clinical Orthodontics; 13(7); pp. 442-453; (interview); Jul. 1979.
Burstone; Dr. Charles J. Burstone on The Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 2); journal of Clinical Orthodontics; 13(8); pp. 539-551 (interview); Aug. 1979.
Cardinal Industrial Finishes; Powder Coatings; 6 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://www.cardinalpaint.com) on Aug. 25, 2000.
Carnaghan, An Alternative to Holograms for the Portrayal of Human Teeth; 4th Int'l. Conf. on Holographic Systems, Components and Applications; pp. 228-231; Sep. 15, 1993.
Chaconas et al,; The DigiGraph Work Station, Part 1, Basic Concepts; Journal of Clinical Orthodontics; 24(6); pp. 360-367; (Author Manuscript); Jun. 1990.
Chafetz et al.; Subsidence of the Femoral Prosthesis, A Stereophotogrammetric Evaluation; Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research; No. 201; pp. 60-67; Dec. 1985.
Chiappone; Constructing the Gnathologic Setup and Positioner; Journal of Clinical Orthodontics; 14(2); pp. 121-133; Feb. 1980.
Chishti et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 60/050,342 entitled “Procedure for moving teeth using a seires of retainers,” filed Jun. 20, 1997.
CSI Computerized Scanning and Imaging Facility; What is a maximum/minimum intensity projection (MIP/MinIP); 1 page; retrived from the internet (http://csi.whoi.edu/content/what-maximumminimum-intensity-projection-mipminip); Jan. 4, 2010.
Cottingham; Gnathologic Clear Plastic Positioner; American Journal of Orthodontics; 55(1); pp. 23-31; Jan. 1969.
Crawford; CAD/CAM in the Dental Office: Does It Work?; Canadian Dental Journal; 57(2); pp. 121-123 Feb. 1991.
Crawford; Computers in Dentistry: Part 1: CAD/CAM: The Computer Moves Chairside, Part 2: F. DuretA Man With a Vision, Part 3: The Computer Gives New Vision—Literally, Part 4: Bytes N Bites The Computer Moves From The Front Desk To The Operatory; Canadian Dental Journal; 54(9); pp. 661-666 Sep. 1988.
Crooks; CAD/CAM Comes to USC; USC Dentistry; pp. 14-17; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) Spring 1990.
Cureton; Correcting Malaligned Mandibular Incisors with Removable Retainers; Journal of Clinical Orthodontics; 30(7); pp. 390-395; Jul. 1996.
Curry et al.; Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping at the Craniofacial Research InstrumentationLaboratory/University of the Pacific; Seminars in Orthodontics; 7(4); pp. 258-265; Dec. 2001.
Cutting et al.; Three-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Design of Craniofacial Surgical Procedures: Optimization and Interaction with Cephalometric and CT-Based Models; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; 77(6); pp. 877-885; Jun. 1986.
DCS Dental AG; The CAD/CAM DCS Titan System for Production of Crowns/Bridges; DSC Production; pp. 1-7; Jan. 1992.
DeFranco et al.; Three-Dimensional Large Displacement Analysis of Orthodontic Appliances; Journal of Biomechanics; 9(12); pp. 793-801; Jan. 1976.
Dental Institute University of Zurich Switzerland; Program for International Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the CEREC-Method; 2 pages; May 1991.
Dentrac Corporation; Dentrac document; pp. 4-13; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1992.
DENT-X; Dentsim . . . Dent-x's virtual reality 3-D training simulator . . . A revolution in dental education; 6 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://www.dent-x.com/DentSim.htm); on Sep. 24, 1998.
Di Muzio et al.; Minimum intensity projection (MinIP); 6 pages; retrieved from the internet (https://radiopaedia.org/articles/minimum-intensity-projection-minip) on Sep. 6, 2018.
Doruk et al.; The role of the headgear timer in extraoral co-operation; European Journal of Orthodontics; 26; pp. 289-291; Jun. 1, 2004.
Doyle; Digital Dentistry; Computer Graphics World; pp. 50-52 andp. 54; Oct. 2000.
Dummer et al.; Computed Radiography Imaging Based on High-Density 670 nm VCSEL Arrays; International Society for Optics and Photonics; vol. 7557; p. 75570H; 7 pages; (Author Manuscript); Feb. 24, 2010.
Duret et al.; CAD/CAM Imaging in Dentistry; Current Opinion in Dentistry; 1 (2); pp. 150-154; Apr. 1991.
Duret et al.; CAD-CAM in Dentistry; Journal of the American Dental Association; 117(6); pp. 715-720; Nov. 1988.
Duret; The Dental CAD/CAM, General Description of the Project; Hennson International Product Brochure, 18 pages; Jan. 1986.
Duret; Vers Une Prosthese Informatisee; Tonus; 75(15); pp. 55-57; (English translation attached); 23 pages; Nov. 15, 1985.
Economides; The Microcomputer in the Orthodontic Office; Journal of Clinical Orthodontics; 13(11); pp. 767-772; Nov. 1979.
Ellias et al.; Proteomic analysis of saliva identifies potential biomarkers for orthodontic tooth movement; The Scientific World Journal; vol. 2012; Article ID 647240; dio:10.1100/2012/647240; 7 pages; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2012.
Elsasser; Some Observations on the History and Uses of the Kesling Positioner; American Journal of Orthodontics; 36(5); pp. 368-374; May 1, 1950.
English translation of Japanese Laid-Open Publication No. 63-11148 to inventor T. Ozukuri (Laid-Open on Jan. 18, 1998) pp. 1-7.
Faber et al.; Computerized Interactive Orthodontic Treatment Planning; American Journal of Orthodontics; 73(1); pp. 36-46; Jan. 1978.
Felton et al.; A Computerized Analysis of the Shape and Stability of Mandibular Arch Form; American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics; 92(6); pp. 478-483; Dec. 1987.
Florez-Moreno; Time-related changes in salivary levels of the osteotropic factors sRANKL and OPG through orthodontic tooth movement; American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics; 143(1); pp. 92-100; Jan. 2013.
Friede et al.; Accuracy of Cephalometric Prediction in Orthognathic Surgery; Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery; 45(9); pp. 754-760; Sep. 1987.
Friedrich et al.; Measuring system for in vivo recording offeree systems in orthodontic treatment-concept and analysis of accuracy; J. Biomech.; 32(1); pp. 81-85; (Abstract Only) Jan. 1999.
Futterling et al.; Automated Finite Element Modeling of a Human Mandible with Dental Implants; JS WSCG '98—Conference Program; 8 pages; retrieved from the Internet (https://dspace5.zcu.ez/bitstream/11025/15851/1/Strasscr_98.pdf); on Aug. 21, 2018.
Gao et al.; 3-D element Generation for Multi-Connected Complex Dental and Mandibular Structure; IEEE Proceedings International Workshop in Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality; pp. 267-271; Jun. 12, 2001.
GIM-ALLDENT Deutschland, “Das DUX System: Die Technik,” 3 pages; (English Translation Included); (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date); 2002.
Gottleib et al.; JCO Interviews Dr. James A. McNamura, Jr., on the Frankel Appliance: Part 2: Clinical 1-1 Management; Journal of Clinical Orthodontics; 16(6); pp. 390-407; retrieved from the internet (http://www.jco-online.com/archive/print_article.asp?Year=1982&Month=06&ArticleNum+); 21 pages; Jun. 1982.
Grayson; New Methods for Three Dimensional Analysis of Craniofacial Deformity, Symposium: Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery; American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons; 48(8) suppl 1; pp. 5-6; Sep. 13, 1990.
Grest, Daniel; Marker-Free Human Motion Capture in Dynamic Cluttered Environments from a Single View-Point, PhD Thesis; 171 pages; Dec. 2007.
Guess et al.; Computer Treatment Estimates in Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery; Journal of Clinical Orthodontics; 23(4); pp. 262-268; 11 pages; (Author Manuscript); Apr. 1989.
Heaven et al.; Computer-Based Image Analysis of Artificial Root Surface Caries; Abstracts of Papers #2094; Journal of Dental Research; 70:528; (Abstract Only); Apr. 17-21, 1991.
Highbeam Research; Simulating stress put on jaw. (ANSYS Inc.'s finite element analysis software); 2 pages; retrieved from the Internet (http://static.highbeam.eom/t/toolingampproduction/november011996/simulatingstressp utonfa..); on Nov. 5, 2004.
Hikage; Integrated Orthodontic Management System for Virtual Three-Dimensional Computer Graphic Simulation and Optical Video Image Database for Diagnosis and Treatment Planning; Journal of Japan KA Orthodontic Society; 46(2); pp. 248-269; 56 pages; (English Translation Included); Feb. 1987.
Hoffmann et al.; Role of Cephalometry for Planning of Jaw Orthopedics and Jaw Surgery Procedures; Informatbnen, pp. 375-396; (English Abstract Included); Mar. 1991.
Hojjatie et al.; Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Glass-Ceramic Dental Crowns; Journal of Biomechanics; 23(11); pp. 1157-1166; Jan. 1990.
Huckins; CAD-CAM Generated Mandibular Model Prototype from MRI Data; AAOMS, p. 96; (Abstract Only); (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1999.
Imani et al.; A wearable chemical-electrophysiological hybrid biosensing system for real-time health and fitness monitoring; Nature Communications; 7; 11650. doi 1038/ncomms11650; 7 pages; May 23, 2016.
INVISALIGN; You were made to move. There's never been a better time to straighten your teeth with the most advanced clear aligner in the world; Product webpage; 2 pages; retrieved from the internet (www.invisalign.com/) on Dec. 28, 2017.
Jia et al.; Epidermal biofuel cells: energy harvesting from human perspiration; Angewandle Chemie International Edition; 52(28); pp. 7233-7236; Jul. 8, 2013.
Jia et al.; Wearable textile biofuel cells for powering electronics; Journal of Materials Chemistry A; 2(43); p. 18184-18189; Oct. 14, 2014.
JCO Interviews; Craig Andreiko , DDS, MS on the Elan and Orthos Systems; Interview by Dr. Larry W. White; Journal of Clinical Orthodontics; 28(8); pp. 459-468; 14 pages; (Author Manuscript); Aug. 1994.
JCO Interviews; Dr. Homer W. Phillips on Computers in Orthodontic Practice, Part 2; Journal of Clinical Orthodontics; 17(12); pp. 819-831; 19 pages; (Author Manuscript); Dec. 1983.
Jeerapan et al.; Stretchable biofuel cells as wearable textile-based self-powered sensors; Journal of Materials Chemistry A; 4(47); p. 18342-18353; Dec. 21, 2016.
Jerrold; The Problem, Electronic Data Transmission and the Law; American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics; 113(4); pp. 478-479; 5 pages; (Author Manuscript); Apr. 1998.
Jones et al.; An Assessment of the Fit of a Parabolic Curve to Pre- and Post-Treatment Dental Arches; British Journal of Orthodontics; 16(2); pp. 85-93; May 1989.
Kamada et.al.; Case Reports On Tooth Positioners Using LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber; J. Nihon University School of Dentistry; 26(1); pp. 11-29; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1984.
Kamada et.al.; Construction of Tooth Positioners with LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber and Some Case KJ Reports; J. Nihon University School of Dentistry; 24(1); pp. 1-27; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1982.
Kanazawa et al.; Three-Dimensional Measurements of the Occlusal Surfaces of Upper Molars in a Dutch Population; Journal of Dental Research; 63(11); pp. 1298-1301; Nov. 1984.
Kesling et al.; The Philosophy of the Tooth Positioning Appliance; American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral surgery; 31(6); pp. 297-304; Jun. 1945.
Kesling; Coordinating the Predetermined Pattern and Tooth Positioner with Conventional Treatment; American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery; 32(5); pp. 285-293; May 1946.
Kim et al.; Advanced materials for printed wearable electrochemical devices: A review; Advanced Electronic Materials; 3(1); 15 pages; 1600260; Jan. 2017.
Kim et al.; Noninvasive alcohol monitoring using a wearable tatto-based iontophoretic-biosensing system; Acs Sensors; 1(8); pp. 1011-1019; Jul. 22, 2016.
Kim et al.; Non-invasive mouthguard biosensor for continuous salivary monitoring of metabolites; Analyst; 139(7); pp. 1632-1636; Apr. 7, 2014.
Kim et al.; A wearable fingernail chemical sensing platform: pH sensing at your fingertips; Taianta; 150; pp. 622-628; Apr. 2016.
Kim et al.; Wearable salivary uric acid mouthguard biosensor with integrated wireless electronics; Biosensors and Bioelectronics; 74; pp. 1061-1068; 19 pages; (Author Manuscript); Dec. 2015.
Kleeman et al.; The Speed Positioner; J. Clin. Orthod.; 30(12); pp. 673-680; Dec. 1996.
Kochanek; Interpolating Splines with Local Tension, Continuity and Bias Control; Computer Graphics; 18(3); pp. 33-41; Jan. 1, 1984.
Kumar et al.; All-printed, stretchable Zn-Ag2o rechargeable battery via, hyperelastic binder for self-powering wearable electronics; Advanced Energy Materials; 7(8); 8 pages; 1602096; Apr. 2017.
Kumar et al.; Biomarkers in orthodontic tooth movement; Journal of Pharmacy Bioallied Sciences; 7(Suppl 2); pp. S325-S330; 12 pages; (Author Manuscript); Aug. 2015.
Kumar et al.; Rapid maxillary expansion: A unique treatment modality in dentistry; J. Clin. Diagn. Res.; 5(4); pp. 906-911; Aug. 2011.
Kunii et al.; Articulation Simulation for an Intelligent Dental Care System; Displays; 15(3); pp. 181-188; Jul. 1994.
Kuroda et al.; Three-Dimensional Dental Cast Analyzing System Using Laser Scanning; American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics; 110(4); pp. 365-369; Oct. 1996.
Laurendeau et al.; A Computer-Vision Technique for the Acquisition and Processing of 3-D Profiles of 7 Dental Imprints: An Application in Orthodontics; IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging; 10(3); pp. 453-461; Sep. 1991.
Leinfelder et al.; A New Method for Generating Ceramic Restorations: a CAD-CAM System; Journal of the American Dental Association; 118(6); pp. 703-707; Jun. 1989.
Manetti et al.; Computer-Aided Cefalometry and New Mechanics in Orthodontics; Fortschr Kieferorthop; 44; pp. 370-376; 8 pages; (English Article Summary Included); (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1983.
McCann; Inside the ADA; J. Amer. Dent. Assoc, 118:286-294; Mar. 1989.
McNamara et al.; Invisible Retainers; J. Clin Orthod.; pp. 570-578; 11 pages; (Author Manuscript); Aug. 1985.
McNamara et al.; Orthodontic and Orthopedic Treatment in the Mixed Dentition; Needham Press; pp. 347-353; Jan. 1993.
Moermann et al., Computer Machined Adhesive Porcelain Inlays: Margin Adaptation after Fatigue Stress; IADR Abstract 339; J. Dent. Res.; 66(a):763; (Abstract Only); (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1987.
Moles; Correcting Mild Malalignments—As Easy as One, Two, Three; AOA/Pro Corner; 11 (2); 2 pages; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2002.
Mormann et al.; Marginale Adaptation von adhasuven Porzellaninlays in vitro; Separatdruck aus:Schweiz. Mschr. Zahnmed.; 95; pp. 1118-1129; 8 pages; (Machine Translated English Abstract); (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date); 1985.
Nahoum; The Vacuum Formed Dental Contour Appliance; N. Y. State Dent. J.; 30(9); pp. 385-390; Nov. 1964.
Nash; CEREC CAD/CAM Inlays: Aesthetics and Durability in a Single Appointment; Dentistry Today; 9(8); pp. 20, 22-23 and 54; Oct. 1990.
Nedelcu et al.; “Scanning Accuracy and Precision In 4 Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Comparison Based On 3-Dimensional Analysis”; J. Prosthet. Dent.; 112(6); pp. 1461-1471; Dec. 2014.
Nishiyama et al.; A New Construction of Tooth Repositioner by LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber; The Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry; 19(2); pp. 93-102 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1977.
Ogawa et al.; Mapping, profiling and clustering of pressure pain threshold (PPT) in edentulous oral muscosa; Journal of Dentistry; 32(3); pp. 219-228; Mar. 2004.
Ogimoto et al.; Pressure-pain threshold determination in the oral mucosa; Journal of Oral Rehabilitation; 29(7); pp. 620-626; Jul. 2002.
Parrilla et al.; A textile-based stretchable multi-ion potentiometric sensor; Advanced Healthcare Materials; 5(9); pp. 996-1001; May 2016.
Paul et al.; Digital Documentation of Individual Human Jaw and Tooth Forms for Applications in Orthodontics; Oral Surgery and Forensic Medicine Proc, of the 24th Annual Conf, of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON 98); vol. 4; pp. 2415-2418; Sep. 4, 1998.
Pinkham; Foolish Concept Propels Technology; Dentist, 3 pages, Jan./Feb. 1989.
Pinkham; Inventors CAD/CAM May Transform Dentistry; Dentist; pp. 1 and 35, Sep. 1990.
Ponitz; Invisible retainers; Am. J. Orthod.; 59(3); pp. 266-272; Mar. 1971.
Procera Research Projects; Procera Research Projects 1993 Abstract Collection; 23 pages; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1993.
Proffit et al.; The first stage of comprehensive treatment alignment and leveling; Contemporary Orthodontics, 3rd Ed.; Chapter 16; Mosby Inc.; pp. 534-537; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2000.
Proffit et al.; The first stage of comprehensive treatment: alignment and leveling; Contemporary Orthodontics; (Second Ed.); Chapter 15, MosbyYear Book; St. Louis, Missouri; pp. 470-533 Oct. 1993.
Raintree ESSIX & ARS Materials, Inc., Raintree Essix, Technical Magazine Table of contents and Essix Appliances, 7 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://www.essix.com/magazine/defaulthtml) on Aug. 13, 1997.
Redmond et al.; Clinical Implications of Digital Orthodontics; American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics; 117(2); pp. 240-242; Feb. 2000.
Rekow et al.; CAD/CAM for Dental Restorations—Some of the Curious Challenges; IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering; 38(4); pp. 314-318; Apr. 1991.
Rekow et al.; Comparison of Three Data Acquisition Techniques for 3-D Tooth Surface Mapping; Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 13(1); pp. 344-345 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1991.
Rekow; A Review of the Developments in Dental CAD/CAM Systems; Current Opinion in Dentistry; 2; pp. 25-33; Jun. 1992.
Rekow; Cad/Cam in Dentistry: A Historical Perspective and View of the Future; Journal Canadian Dental Association; 58(4); pp. 283, 287-288; Apr. 1992.
Rekow; Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Dentistry: A Review of the State of the Art; Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry; 58(4); pp. 512-516; Dec. 1987.
Rekow; Dental CAD-CAM Systems: What is the State of the Art?; The Journal of the American Dental Association; 122(12); pp. 43-48; Dec. 1991.
Rekow; Feasibility of an Automated System for Production of Dental Restorations, Ph.D. Thesis; Univ. of Minnesota, 250 pages, Nov. 1988.
Richmond et al.; The Development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): Reliability and Validity.; The European Journal of Orthodontics; 14(2); pp. 125-139; Apr. 1992.
Richmond et al.; The Development of a 3D Cast Analysis System; British Journal of Orthodontics; 13(1); pp. 53-54; Jan. 1986.
Richmond; Recording The Dental Cast In Three Dimensions; American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics; 92(3); pp. 199-206; Sep. 1987.
Rudge; Dental Arch Analysis: Arch Form, A Review of the Literature; The European Journal of Orthodontics; 3(4); pp. 279-284; Jan. 1981.
Sahm et al.; “Micro-Electronic Monitoring of Functional Appliance Wear”; Eur J Orthod.; 12(3); pp. 297-301; Aug. 1990.
Sahm; Presentation of a wear timer for the clarification of scientific questions in orthodontic orthopedics; Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie; 51 (4); pp. 243-247; (Translation Included) Jul. 1990.
Sakuda et al.; Integrated Information-Processing System in Clinical Orthodontics: An Approach with Use of a Computer Network System; American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics; 101(3); pp. 210-220; 20 pages; (Author Manuscript) Mar. 1992.
Schafer et al.; “Quantifying patient adherence during active orthodontic treatment with removable appliances using microelectronic wear-time documentation”; Eur J Orthod.; 37(1)pp. 1-8; doi:10.1093/ejo/cju012; Jul. 3, 2014.
Schellhas et al.; Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Surgical Planning; Archives of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery; 114(4); pp. 438-442; Apr. 1988.
Schroeder et al.; Eds. The Visual Toolkit, Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey; Chapters 6, 8 & 9, (pp. 153-210,309-354, and 355-428; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1998.
Shilliday; Minimizing finishing problems with the mini-positioner; American Journal of Orthodontics; 59(6); pp. 596-599; Jun. 1971.
Shimada et al.; Application of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for diagnosis of caries, cracks, and defects of restorations; Current Oral Health Reports; 2(2); pp. 73-80; Jun. 2015.
Siemens; CEREC—Computer-Reconstruction, High Tech in derZahnmedizin; 15 pagesl; (Includes Machine Translation); (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date); 2004.
Sinclair; The Readers' Corner; Journal of Clinical Orthodontics; 26(6); pp. 369-372; 5 pages; retrived from the internet (http://www.jco-online.com/archive/print article.asp?Year=1992&Month=06&ArticleNum=); Jun. 1992.
Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, CEREC 3D, Manuel utiiisateur, Version 2.0X (in French); 114 pages; (English translation of table of contents included); (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date); 2003.
Stoll et al.; Computer-aided Technologies in Dentistry; Dtsch Zahna'rztl Z 45, pp. 314-322; (English Abstract Included); (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1990.
Sturman; Interactive Keyframe Animation of 3-D Articulated Models; Proceedings Graphics Interface '84; vol. 86; pp. 35-40; May-Jun. 1984.
The American Heritage, Stedman's Medical Dictionary; Gingiva; 3 pages; retrieved from the interent (http://reference.com/search/search?q=gingiva) on Nov. 5, 2004.
The Dental Company Sirona: Cere omnicam and cerec bluecam brochure: The first choice in every case; 8 pages; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2014.
THERA MON; “Microsensor”; 2 pages; retrieved from the internet (www.english.thera-mon.com/the-product/transponder/index.html); on Sep. 19, 2016.
THORLABS; Pellin broca prisms; 1 page; retrieved from the internet (www.thorlabs.com); Nov. 30, 2012.
Tiziani et al.; Confocal principle for macro and microscopic surface and defect analysis; Optical Engineering; 39(1); pp. 32-39; Jan. 1, 2000.
TRUAX; Truax Clasp-Less(TM) Appliance System; The Functional Orthodontist; 9(5); pp. 22-24, 26-8; September-Oct. 1992.
TRU-TATN Orthodontic & Dental Supplies, Product Brochure, Rochester, Minnesota 55902, 16 pages; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1996.
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Holodontography: An Introduction to Dental Laser Holography; School of Aerospace Medicine Brooks AFB Tex; Mar. 1973, 40 pages; Mar. 1973.
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service; Automated Crown Replication Using Solid Photography SM; Solid Photography Inc., Melville NY,; 20 pages; Oct. 1977.
Vadapalli; Minimum intensity projection (MinIP) is a data visualization; 7 pages; retrieved from the internet (https://prezi.com/tdmttnmv2knw/minimum-intensity-projection-minip-is-a-data-visualization/) on Sep. 6, 2018.
Van Der Linden et al.; Three-Dimensional Analysis of Dental Casts by Means of the Optocom; Journal of Dental Research; 51(4); p. 1100; Jul.-Aug. 1972.
Van Der Linden; A New Method to Determine Tooth Positions and Dental Arch Dimensions; Journal of Dental Research; 51(4); p. 1104; Jul.-Aug. 1972.
Van Der Zel; Ceramic-Fused-to-Metal Restorations with a New CAD/CAM System; Quintessence International; 24(A); pp. 769-778; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date); 1993.
Van Hilsen et al.; Comparing potential early caries assessment methods for teledentistry; BMC Oral Health; 13(16); doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-16; 9 pages; Mar. 2013.
Varady et al.; Reverse Engineering of Geometric Models An Introduction; Computer-Aided Design; 29(4); pp. 255-268; 20 pages; (Author Manuscript); Apr. 1997.
Verstreken et al.; An Image-Guided Planning System for Endosseous Oral Implants; IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging; 17(5); pp. 842-852; Oct. 1998.
Warunek et al.; Physical and Mechanical Properties of Elastomers in Orthodonic Positioners; American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics; 95(5); pp. 388-400; 21 pages; (Author Manuscript); May 1989.
Warunek et.al.; Clinical Use of Silicone Elastomer Applicances; JCO; 23 (10); pp. 694-700; Oct. 1989.
Watson et al.; Pressures recorded at te denture base-mucosal surface interface in complete denture wearers; Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 14(6); pp. 575-589; Nov. 1987.
Wells; Application of the Positioner Appliance in Orthodontic Treatment; American Journal of Orthodontics; 58(4); pp. 351-366; Oct. 1970.
Wikipedia; Palatal expansion; 3 pages; retrieved from the internet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palatal_expansion) on Mar. 5, 2018.
Williams; Dentistry and CAD/CAM: Another French Revolution; J. Dent. Practice Admin.; 4(1); pp. 2-5 Jan./Mar. 1987.
Williams; The Switzerland and Minnesota Developments in CAD/CAM; Journal of Dental Practice Administration; 4(2); pp. 50-55; Apr./Jun. 1987.
Windmiller et al.; Wearable electrochemical sensors and biosensors: a review; Electroanalysis; 25(1); pp. 29-46; Jan. 2013.
Wireless Sensor Networks Magazine; Embedded Teeth for Oral Activity Recognition; 2 pages; retrieved on Sep. 19, 2016 from the internet (www.wsnmagazine.com/embedded-teeth/); Jul. 29, 2013.
Wishan; New Advances in Personal Computer Applications for Cephalometric Analysis, Growth Prediction, Surgical Treatment Planning and Imaging Processing; Symposium: Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxilofacial Surgery; p. 5; Presented on Sep. 13, 1990.
Witt et al.; The wear-timing measuring device in orthodontics-cui bono? Reflections on the state-of-the-art in wear-timing measurement and compliance research in orthodontics; Fortschr Kieferorthop.; 52(3); pp. 117-125; (Translation Included) Jun. 1991.
Wolf; Three-dimensional structure determination of semi-transparent objects from holographic data; Optics Communications; 1(4); pp. 153-156; Sep. 1969.
WSCG'98—Conference Program, The Sixth International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics and Visualization '98; pp. 1-7; retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 5, 2004, (http://wscg.zcu.cz/wscg98/wscg98.htm); Feb. 9-13, 1998.
Xia et al.; Three-Dimensional Virtual-Reality Surgical Planning and Soft-Tissue Prediction for Orthognathic Surgery; IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine; 5(2); pp. 97-107; Jun. 2001.
Yamada et al.; Simulation of fan-beam type optical computed-tomography imaging of strongly scattering and weakly absorbing media; Applied Optics; 32(25); pp. 4808-4814; Sep. 1, 1993.
Yamamoto et al.; Optical Measurement of Dental Cast Profile and Application to Analysis of Three-Dimensional Tooth Movement in Orthodontics; Front. Med. Biol. Eng., 1(2); pp. 119-130; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date); 1988.
Yamamoto et al.; Three-Dimensional Measurement of Dental Cast Profiles and Its Applications to Orthodontics; Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc.; 12(5); pp. 2052-2053; Nov. 1990.
Yamany et al.; A System for Human Jaw Modeling Using Intra-Oral Images; Proc, of the 20th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; vol. 2; pp. 563-566; Oct. 1998.
Yoshii; Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); 111. The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 1, Dental and Functional Reversed Occlusion Case Reports; Nippon Dental Review; 457; pp. 146-164; 43 pages; (Author Manuscript); Nov. 1980.
Yoshii; Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); I. The D.P. Concept and Implementation of Transparent Silicone Resin (Orthocon); Nippon Dental Review; 452; pp. 61-74; 32 pages; (Author Manuscript); Jun. 1980.
Yoshii; Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); II. The D.P. Manufacturing Procedure and Clinical Applications; Nippon Dental Review; 454; pp. 107-130; 48 pages; (Author Manuscript); Aug. 1980.
Yoshii; Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); III—The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 2. Skeletal Reversed Occlusion Case Reports; Nippon Dental Review; 458; pp. 112-129; 40 pages; (Author Manuscript); Dec. 1980.
Zhou et al.; Bio-logic analysis of injury biomarker patterns in human serum samples; Taianta; 83(3); pp. 955-959; Jan. 15, 2011.
Zhou et al.; Biofuel cells for self-powered electrochemical biosensing and logic biosensing: A review; Electroanalysis; 24(2); pp. 197-209; Feb. 2012.
Grove et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/726,243 entitled “Interproximal reduction templates,” filed Oct. 5, 2017.
Sato et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/041,606 entitled “Palatal contour anchorage,” filed Jul. 20, 2018.
Sato et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/048,054 entitled “Optical coherence tomography for orthodontic aligners,” filed Jul. 27, 2018.
Miller et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/038,088 entitled “Method and apparatuses for interactive ordering of dental aligners,” filed Jul. 17, 2018.
Moalem et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/046,897 entitled Tooth shading, transparency and glazing, filed Jul. 26, 2018.
Nyukhtikov et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/998,883 entitled “Buccal corridor assessment and computation,” filed Aug. 15, 2018.
Kopelman et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/152,281 entitled “Intraoral appliances for sampling soft-tissue,” filed Oct. 4, 2018.
Morton et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/177,067 entitled “Dental appliance having selective occlusal loading and controlled intercuspation,” filed Oct. 31, 2018.
Akopov et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/178,491 entitled “Automatic treatment planning,” filed Nov. 1, 2018.
Elbaz et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/198,488 entitled “Intraoral scanner with dental diagnostics capabilities,” filed Nov. 21, 2018.
Elbaz et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/188,262 entitled “Intraoral scanner with dental diagnostics capabilities,” filed Nov. 12, 2018.
O'Leary et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,701 entitled “Orthodontic retainers,” filed Nov. 19, 2018.
Arakawa et al.; Mouthguard biosensor with telemetry system for monitoring of saliva glucose: A novel cavitas sensor; Biosensors and Bioelectronics; 84; pp. 106-111; Oct. 2016.
beautyworlds.com; Virtual plastic surgery—beautysurge.com announces launch of cosmetic surgery digital imaging services; 5 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://www.beautyworlds.com/cosmossurgdigitalimagning.htm); Mar. 2004.
Berland; The use of smile libraries for cosmetic dentistry; Dental Tribunne: Asia pacfic Edition; pp. 16-18; Mar. 29, 2006.
Bookstein; Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and decomposition of deformations; IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence; 11(6); pp. 567-585; Jun. 1989.
Cadent Inc.; OrthoCAD ABO user guide; 38 pages; Dec. 21, 2005.
Cadent Inc.; Reviewing and modifying an orthoCAD case; 4 pages; Feb. 14, 2005.
Daniels et al.; The development of the index of complexity outcome and need (ICON); British Journal of Orthodontics; 27(2); pp. 149-162; Jun. 2000.
Dentrix; Dentrix G3, new features; 2 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://www.dentrix.com/g3/new_features/index.asp); on Jun. 6, 2008.
Di Giacomo et al.; Clinical application of sterolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: Preliminary results; Journal Periodontolgy; 76(4); pp. 503-507; Apr. 2005.
Gansky; Dental data mining: potential pitfalls and practical issues; Advances in Dental Research; 17(1); pp. 109-114; Dec. 2003.
Geomagic; Dental reconstruction; 1 page; retrieved from the internet (http://geomagic.com/en/solutions/industry/detal_desc.php) on Jun. 6, 2008.
Gottschalk et al.; OBBTree: A hierarchical structure for rapid interference detection; 12 pages; (http://www.cs.unc.edu/?geom/OBB/OBBT.html); relieved from te internet (https://www.cse.iitk.ac.in/users/amit/courses/RIVIP/presentations/dslamba/presentation/sig96.pdf) on Apr. 25, 2019.
gpsdentaire.com; Get a realistic smile simulation in 4 steps with GPS; a smile management software; 10 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://www.gpsdentaire.com/en/preview/) on Jun. 6, 2008.
Karaman et al.; A practical method of fabricating a lingual retainer; Am. Journal of Orthodontic and Dentofacial Orthopedics; 124(3); pp. 327-330; Sep. 2003.
Mantzikos et al.; Case report: Forced eruption and implant site development; The Angle Orthodontist; 68(2); pp. 179-186; Apr. 1998.
Methot; Get the picture with a gps for smile design in 3 steps; Spectrum; 5(4); pp. 100-105; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2006.
OrthoCAD downloads; retrieved Jun. 27, 2012 from the internet (www.orthocad.com/download/downloads.asp); 2 pages; Feb. 14, 2005.
Page et al.; Validity and accuracy of a risk calculator in predicting periodontal disease; Journal of the American Dental Association; 133(5); pp. 569-576; May 2002.
Patterson Dental; Cosmetic imaging; 2 pages retrieved from the internet (http://patterson.eaglesoft.net/cnt_di_cosimg.html) on Jun. 6, 2008.
Rose et al.; The role of orthodontics in implant dentistry; British Dental Journal; 201(12); pp. 753-764; Dec. 23, 2006.
Rubin et al.; Stress analysis of the human tooth using a three-dimensional finite element model; Journal of Dental Research; 62(2); pp. 82-86; Feb. 1983.
Sarment et al.; Accuracy of implant placement with a sterolithographic surgical guide journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants; 118(4); pp. 571-577; Jul. 2003.
Smalley; Implants for tooth movement: Determining implant location and orientation: Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry; 7(2); pp. 62-72; Mar. 1995.
Smart Technology; Smile library II; 1 page; retrieved from the internet (http://smart-technology.net/) on Jun. 6, 2008.
Smile-Vision_The smile-vision cosmetic imaging system; 2 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://www.smile-vision.net/cos_imaging.php) on Jun. 6, 2008.
Szeliski; Introduction to computer vision: Structure from motion; 64 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://robots.Stanford.edu/cs223b05/notes/CS%20223-B%20L10%structurefrommotion1b.ppt, on Feb. 3, 2005.
Vevin et al.; Pose estimation of teeth through crown-shape matching; In Medical Imaging: Image Processing of International Society of Optics and Photonics; vol. 4684; pp. 955-965; May 9, 2002.
Virtual Orthodontics; Our innovative software; 2 pages; (http://www.virtualorthodontics.com/innovativesoftware.html); retrieved from the internet (https://web.archive.org/web/20070518085145/http://www.virtualorthodontics.com/innovativesoftware.html); (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 2005.
Wiedmann; According to the laws of harmony to find the right tooth shape with assistance of the computer; Digital Dental News; 2nd Vol.; pp. 0005-0008; (English Version Included); Apr. 2008.
Wong et al.; Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guidance for placement of dental implants: Case report; Implant Dentistry; 16(2); pp. 123-130; Sep. 2007.
Wong et al.; The uses of orthodontic study models in diagnosis and treatment planning; Hong Knog Dental Journal; 3(2); pp. 107-115; Dec. 2006.
Yaltara Software; Visual planner; 1 page; retrieved from the internet (http://yaltara.com/vp/) on Jun. 6, 2008.
Zhang et al.; Visual speech features extraction for improved speech recognition; 2002 IEEE International conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing; vol. 2; 4 pages; May 13-17, 2002.
Arnone et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/235,449 entitled “Method and system for providing indexing and cataloguing of orthodontic related treatment profiles and options,” filed Dec. 28, 2018.
Mason et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/374,648 entitled “Dental condition evaluation and treatment,” filed Apr. 3, 2019.
Brandt et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 16/235,490 entitled “Dental wire attachment,” filed Dec. 28, 2018.
Kou; U.S. Appl. No. 16/270,891 entitled “Personal data file,” filed Feb. 8, 2019.

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20190231477 A1	Aug 2019	US

Provisional Applications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	62593241	Nov 2017	US

Sensors for monitoring oral appliances

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

US

CPC

International Classifications

Term Extension

Abstract