Patent Grant
10364809
The innovations and related subject matter disclosed herein (collectively referred to as the “disclosure”) pertain to control systems, and more particularly, but not exclusively, to detectors configured to issue an alert or a command to a controller in response to a detected change in state of a given system, with a leak detector configured to respond to a detected leak of a working fluid from a liquid-based heat transfer system being but one example of disclosed detectors and related innovations, and with a flow-rate sensor configured to detect a rate of flow of a fluid through a conduit, for example an optical flow-rate sensor, being but one other example of disclosed sensors and related innovations. Some detectors and control systems are described in relation to cooling systems for electronic devices by way of example. Nonetheless, one or more of the innovations disclosed herein can be suitable for use in a variety of other control-system applications, as will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art following a review of the present disclosure.
Computer system performance and heat dissipation density continue to increase. Consequently, conventional air-cooling is giving way to liquid-cooling in some computer system applications, including, but not exclusively, server and data center applications. Although commercially available liquid cooling systems are considered to be reliable and to provide known and repeatable performance, an automated approach for detecting an unlikely leak might be desirable in some applications. However, commercially available moisture sensors and leak detectors are not compatible with existing control systems for computer systems.
Also, approaches for monitoring a rate of flow of a fluid through one or more conduits might be desirable in some applications. For example, a rate of heat transfer through a liquid-to-liquid or an air-to-liquid (or a liquid-to-air) heat exchanger can correspond to a rate of flow of a heat transfer medium (e.g., a liquid coolant) through the heat exchanger. As but one other example, a substantial excursion of fluid flow rate through a conduit can indirectly indicate a leak upstream of the conduit, or a change in heat-transfer performance.
However, many commercially available flow-rate sensors are generally considered to be incompatible with existing liquid-cooling systems suitable for computer systems. For example, some known flow-rate sensors are typically too large, too expensive, or both, to be incorporated into liquid-cooling systems suitable for widespread commercialization in connection with cooling systems for computer systems, or other systems.
Accordingly, there remains a need for sensors configured to detect a leak from a liquid cooling system. There also remains a need for a monitoring system configured to initiate an alert responsive to a leak detected by the leak detector. A need also remains for a leak detector configured to be compatible with a control system for a computer system or other computing environment. And, there remains a need for flow-rate sensors configured to detect or sense a rate of flow of a working fluid through a conduit, for example, a portion of a flow path through a portion of a liquid-cooling system. There remains a further need for flow sensors to emit a signal responsive to a detected or a sensed flow rate of the working fluid.
There also remains a need for such sensors to be compatible with existing communications busses, e.g., by using existing communication protocols or by multiplexing over existing communication busses (e.g., an IPMI bus).
Innovations and related subject matter disclosed herein overcome many problems in the prior art and address one or more of the aforementioned, as well as other, needs. This disclosure pertains generally to control systems, including, for example, detectors configured to issue an alert or a command to a controller in response to a detected change in state of a given system. For example, some disclosed detectors are configured to emit a simulated signal (e.g., an electrical signal) as a proxy for a state observed by a sensor, with a simulated fan-tachometer signal being but one example of a proxy signal.
Some disclosed detectors are configured to detect a leak of a working fluid from a heat-transfer system. Some disclosed leak detectors are configured to issue an alert or a command to a controller in response to a detected leak of a working fluid from a liquid-based heat transfer system.
Some disclosed detectors are configured to assess one or more aspects of a flow field, e.g., to assess a flow rate. Some disclosed detectors are configured to detect a flow rate of a working fluid through a portion of a heat-transfer system. Some disclosed flow-rate sensors are configured to emit a signal, or to issue an alert or a command to a controller in response to an observed or a detected change in state of a given system.
For example, some disclosed flow-rate sensors are configured to emit a signal, or to issue an alert or a command to a controller in response to an observed or a detected rate of flow (or an indicia of a rate of flow) of a working fluid through a liquid-based heat transfer system, as when an observed, detected, or indicated rate of flow exceeds a selected upper threshold flow rate or falls below a selected lower threshold flow rate. Some flow-rate sensors are configured to emit an output signal corresponding to an observed rate of flow (or an observed indicia thereof).
By way of example and not limitation, a flow-rate sensor can be configured to emit a simulated fan-tachometer signal (or other proxy signal) proportional to (or, more broadly, corresponding to) an indicia of flow rate observed by the sensor. A controller configured to receive such a simulated fan-tachometer signal can interpret the simulated fan-tachometer signal as corresponding to a predetermined measure of the indicia of flow rate (or measure of the flow rate). In response, the controller can issue a system command in correspondence to the indicia (or flow rate). As but one example, the system command can be a command to transmit an alert to a system administrator and/or a command to increase pump speed, as when the indicated flow rate might not suffice to cool an observed or an anticipated heat load, or to decrease pump speed, as when the indicated flow rate might provide more cooling than necessary based on an observed or an anticipated heat load and continued operation of the pump at a relatively higher speed emits more acoustic noise or consumes more energy than desired.
In some embodiments, an emitted signal, or an alert or command, includes a simulated fan-tachometer signal corresponding to a selected fan-rotational-speed as a proxy for an observed state different than a fan-rotational-speed (e.g., a flow rate or a detected leak). For example, an observed operational state can include an operational state of one or more system devices (e.g., a pump in a liquid-cooling system, a heat exchanger in a liquid cooling system, a frequency of an optical signal emitted by an optical emitter, an observed flow rate through one or more portions of a cooling system (e.g., through a segment of a conduit carrying a working fluid), etc.).
As but one possible and non-limiting example, a sensor can emit, in response to a detected one of a plurality of observable conditions, a simulated fan-tachometer signal corresponding to a respective fan-rotational speed as a proxy corresponding to the detected condition. For example, a leak detector can emit, in response to a detected leak, a simulated fan-tachometer signal corresponding to a fan-rotational-speed of 500 RPM (revolutions per minute). In turn, the fan rotational speed of 500 RPM can be interpreted by a controller as indicating, for example, that a leak has occurred (or at least has been detected) at a given system location.
As another example, a flow-rate sensor can emit, in response to a first observed flow rate (or an observed indicia of such a flow rate), a simulated fan-tachometer signal corresponding to a first fan-rotational-speed and a second fan rotational speed in response to an observed other flow rate (or indicia thereof). For example, the flow-rate sensor can emit a simulated fan-tachometer signal indicative of a selected fan speed proportional to the observed flow rate (or indicia thereof). A controller that receives such a proxy signal can, at least partially responsively to the proxy signal, issue a selected command (e.g., a system command to alter or to maintain a system operational state, a system shut-down command, an administrator alert command) responsive to a given interpretation of the proxy signal.
Some controllers are embodied in a computing environment.
As used herein, “working fluid” means a fluid used for or capable of absorbing heat from a region having a relatively higher temperature, carrying the absorbed heat (as by advection) from the region having a relatively higher temperature to a region having a relatively lower temperature, and rejecting at least a portion of the absorbed heat to the region having a relatively lower temperature. Although many formulations of working fluids are possible, common formulations include distilled water, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and mixtures thereof.
Some disclosed leak detectors include a sensor operatively coupled to a leak detector circuit. A leak detector circuit can be configured to deliver a signal having a selected waveform to a monitor circuit during normal operation of the cooling system and to terminate or otherwise interrupt the signal (as by modifying the waveform, for example) when a leak of liquid is detected, as by the sensor. Some disclosed leak detectors are configured to deliver a simulated tachometer signal to a monitor circuit or computing environment. The simulated tachometer signal can be similar to a tachometer signal emitted by a fan during normal operation of the fan until a leak is detected. Upon receiving a signal or other indication of a leak, the leak detector circuit can emit a different signal (or no signal) after a leak is detected. The different signal can be emitted continuously or only while a leak (or moisture or other proxy for a leak) is detected by the sensor.
For example, some disclosed leak detector circuits are configured to emit a simulated tachometer signal, e.g., a square wave having a duty cycle of about 50% (e.g., a duty cycle ranging from about 45% to about 55%), during normal operation, and to terminate or otherwise interrupt the simulated tachometer signal in response to a detected leak (or moisture or other proxy for a leak, such as a low operating pressure or a low-fluid level internal to the heat-transfer system). Such a leak detector circuit can be compatible with commercially available monitor circuits, firmware and/or software, particularly but not exclusively, monitor circuits, firmware and/or software configured to monitor a rotational speed of a fan using a tachometer signal emitted by the fan. Some monitors (e.g., circuits and/or computing environments) can be based on, by way of example, the Intelligent Platform Management Initiative (IPMI) specification, ver. 1.5/2.0 (described more fully below).
In some embodiments, a plurality of sensors or detectors can be operatively coupled to a given communication circuit, and a controller can configured to monitor the given communication circuit. Each respective sensor or detector in the plurality of sensors or detectors can be configured to emit any of a plurality of discrete, simulated signals as respective proxies for a plurality of selected, detectable operational states. For example, the sensors or detectors can emit discrete, simulated fan-tachometer signals corresponding to respective system operational states. Such multiplexing can allow existing communication channels to carry information regarding observed system operational states that differ substantially from the information historically carried by the existing communication channels.
By way of example and not limitation, a leak detector can be configured not to emit a simulated fan-tachometer signal in the absence of an observed leak, and to emit (e.g., over a selected communication circuit), responsively to a detected leak, a selected simulated fan-tachometer signal (e.g., a simulated fan-tachometer signal corresponding to a fan-rotational speed of 200 RPM). A controller configured to receive such a simulated fan-tachometer signal can interpret the simulated fan-tachometer signal as corresponding to a predetermined operational state. In response, the controller can issue a system command in correspondence with the operational state. As but one example, the system command can be a command to transmit an alert to a system administrator or a command to shut the system down.
As another example, a sensor can be configured to observe an operational state of a centrifugal pump. The sensor can be configured to emit a simulated fan-tachometer signal corresponding to a different fan-rotational speed (e.g., 400 RPM) in response to an observed pump failure (e.g., a pump rotational speed below a selected threshold rotational speed). A controller configured to receive the simulated fan-tachometer signal can issue a system command in response to and corresponding to the indication of a pump failure. The system command can include one or more of a command to transmit an alert to a system administrator, a command to increase a rotational speed of one or more other selected pumps, and a command to shut the system down.
Other particular but non-exclusive examples of multiplexed sensors include sensors configured to observe one or more of a rotational speed of the pump, a static pressure in a fluid within the pump, a temperature of a liquid in the pump, a temperature of a pump component, a flow rate through a conduit, and a number of hours during which a given pump has operated. Each sensor can be configured to emit a selected proxy signal corresponding to an observed operational state of the system.
Other innovative aspects of this disclosure will become readily apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art from a careful review of the following detailed description (and accompanying drawings), wherein various embodiments of disclosed innovations are shown and described by way of illustration. As will be realized, other and different embodiments of leak detectors and systems incorporating one or more of the disclosed innovations are possible and several disclosed details are capable of being modified in various respects, each without departing from the spirit and scope of the principles disclosed herein. For example, the detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended to describe various embodiments of the disclosed innovations and is not intended to represent the only contemplated embodiments of the innovations disclosed herein. Instead, the detailed description includes specific details for the purpose of providing a comprehensive understanding of the principles disclosed herein. Accordingly the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive.
Unless specified otherwise, the accompanying drawings illustrate aspects of the innovative subject matter described herein. Referring to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals indicate similar parts throughout the several views, several examples of systems incorporating aspects of the presently disclosed principles are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, wherein:
The following describes various innovative principles related to control systems by way of reference to specific examples of sensors for such systems. More particularly, but not exclusively, such innovative principles are described in relation to examples of leak detectors configured to detect a leak of a working fluid from a liquid-based heat transfer system (e.g., a liquid-based cooling system for cooling one or more electronic components that dissipate heat during operation), examples of flow-rate sensors configured to observe a flow rate through a liquid-based heat-transfer system, and related systems. Nonetheless, one or more of the disclosed principles can be incorporated in various other control system embodiments to achieve any of a variety of desired control system characteristics. Systems described in relation to particular configurations, applications, or uses, are merely examples of systems incorporating one or more of the innovative principles disclosed herein and are used to illustrate one or more innovative aspects of the disclosed principles.
Thus, control systems, sensors, leak detectors, flow-rate sensors, and associated circuits, computing environments, firmware and/or software having attributes that are different from those specific examples discussed herein can embody one or more of the innovative principles, and can be used in applications not described herein in detail, for example, to detect a leak of a fluid (e.g., a liquid, a gas, or a saturated mixture thereof) from, or to observe a local speed of a flow of such a fluid through, a heat-transfer system having any of a variety of flow configurations, such as a contained flow within a fluid conduit or a free-stream flow (e.g., a region of a fluid flow sufficiently spaced from a fluid boundary as not to be influenced by the boundary). Such systems can be configured to transfer heat to or from laser components, light-emitting diodes, chemical reactants undergoing a chemical reaction, photovoltaic cells, solar collectors, power electronic components, electronic components other than microprocessors, photonic integrated circuits, and other electronic modules, as well as a variety of other industrial, military and consumer systems now known or hereafter developed. Accordingly, embodiments of detectors and related control systems not described herein in detail also fall within the scope of this disclosure, as will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art following a review of this disclosure.
Overview
A wide variety of control systems have been proposed and used. In a general sense, control systems estimate or observe an attribute of a given system under control of the control system. In response to the estimated or observed attribute, a control system can provide an output corresponding to the estimated or observed attribute in order to achieve a desired system response. Controls systems (or portions thereof) disclosed herein can be implemented in a computing environment. As indicated above and explained more fully below, some disclosed systems are configured to detect a leak of a working fluid from, for example, a liquid-based heat-transfer system. Some disclosed systems are configured to transmit an alert or other command in response to a detected leak.
Some disclosed sensors are configured to be backward compatible with existing control systems. For example, some existing control systems configured to monitor an operational status of a cooling fan for a computer system are configured to emit a signal corresponding to observed fan speeds, or to issue an alert or other command, when an observed fan speed drops below a selected threshold.
Taking advantage of an installed base of such existing control systems, some disclosed sensors have a circuit configured to emit a first simulated tachometer signal corresponding to a first observed condition (e.g., similar to a tachometer signal emitted by a normally operating fan) and to emit a different simulated tachometer signal corresponding to a second observed condition. In some instances, the different signal emitted in response to the second observed condition can be similar to a tachometer signal emitted by a failed or failing fan (e.g., a fan operating at an unacceptably low fan speed, or a fan having a locked rotor).
Another example of an operational status includes a flow rate through a conduit. Some disclosed sensors emit a simulated fan tachometer signal in correspondence with an observed volumetric (or mass) flow rate (or indicia thereof, such as, for example, a rotational speed of a rotational member within the flow of fluid).
An operational status can reflect a presence or absence of a detected leak. Some disclosed leak detectors have a circuit configured to emit a simulated tachometer signal similar to a tachometer signal emitted by a normally operating fan when no leak is detected and to emit a different signal (or no signal) in response to a detected leak. The different signal emitted in response to a detected leak can be similar to a tachometer signal emitted by a failed or failing fan (e.g., a fan operating at an unacceptably low fan speed, or a fan having a locked rotor).
Some disclosed systems incorporate a sensor configured to detect or observe an indicia of a change in state of a heat-transfer system. Some indicia pertain to a rate of flow of a working fluid, for example, through a portion of a liquid-based heat-transfer system. Other indicia pertain to a leak of such a working fluid. Some disclosed systems are configured to transmit an alert or other command in response to a threshold condition observed or detected by such a sensor.
As but one example, some disclosed flow-rate sensors are configured to observe (or to detect) a frequency at which a rotational member rotates about a selected axis of rotation in response to a passing flow of a working fluid. As will be described more fully below, such a rotational frequency can correspond to a speed (and thus a rate of flow) at which a flow of a selected fluid passes by or over the rotational member.
Control Systems
By way of introduction, computer systems commonly include one or more axial fans for cooling an electronic component. A rate of heat transfer from an electronic component or from a liquid-to-air heat exchanger (e.g., a radiator) to a stream of air passing over the component or the heat exchanger generally corresponds, in part, to a speed of the air stream. A speed of such an air stream generally corresponds to a rotational speed of the fan.
Taking advantage of such a correspondence between a fan's rotational speed (sometimes expressed in units of “revolutions per minute” or “RPM”, and sometimes referred to as a “fan speed”) and a rate of cooling afforded to an electronic component or a heat exchanger, some computer systems include a control system configured to adjust a fan speed in response to an observed temperature (e.g., a temperature of an electronic component). As an example, some control systems are configured to modulate a duty cycle of, for example, a square wave, and some fans, in turn, are configured to adjust their fan speed in correspondence with the modulated duty cycle.
In addition (or alternatively), some computer systems include a control system configured to observe an output signal from a fan. Such an output signal can correspond to a rotational speed of the fan. For example, a fan can include a Hall cell configured to emit a square wave having a frequency corresponding to a rotational speed of a rotating magnetic field generated by a rotating fan rotor. Such an emitted square wave can have a duty cycle of about 50% when the rotor rotates at an approximately constant speed. Since the frequency of the square wave can correspond to the rotational speed of the fan, such a square wave is sometimes referred to as a “tachometer signal.”
In general, a control system can be configured to transmit an alert or other command in response to an observed signal exceeding a selected upper threshold or falling below a selected lower threshold. Some control systems are configured to resume monitoring the observed signal after transmitting the alert or other command. Other control systems (sometimes referred to in the art as a “latching system”) are configured to continuously transmit an alert or other command.
Some existing control systems are configured to observe a tachometer signal emitted by a rotating fan and to emit a signal or otherwise initiate a system command (e.g., send an “alert”, or initiate a system shut-down) in response to a selected change in state of a tachometer signal. A selected change of state of a tachometer signal can include a drop in frequency below a selected threshold (e.g., corresponding to an unacceptably low fan speed), a cessation of a tachometer signal or an emission of steady-state tachometer signal, as when a fan rotor stops rotating. In relation to
Some suitable control systems configured to monitor fan speed are based on the Intelligent Platform Management Initiative (IPMI) specification, ver. 1.5/2.0. Generally, IPMI is a message-based, hardware-level interface specification. An IPMI subsystem can operate independently of an operating system of a computer incorporating the IPMI subsystem, allowing a system administrator to manage the computer independently of the operating system (e.g., before the operating system boots, or when the computer is powered down). A Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) can include a specialized microcontroller configured to manage an interface between the system management software and computer system hardware.
Among many features, an IPMI subsystem can monitor a status of various operating parameters, including, for example, system temperatures, fan speeds, chassis intrusion, etc. In some instances, an IPMI subsystem can be configured to monitor a tachometer signal emitted by one or more fans and, when the tachometer signal indicates a fan speed below a selected threshold, the subsystem can emit an alert or other command.
Computer systems incorporating such control systems for fans commonly include a plurality of electrical connectors, with each being configured to operatively couple a fan to a corresponding plurality of circuits configured, respectively, to power, control and monitor the fan. For example, such an electrical connector can have four electrical couplers corresponding respectively to (A) a power supply circuit configured to convey an electrical current for powering the fan motor; (B) an electrical ground; (C) a pulse-width modulation circuit configured to convey a pulse-width modulation signal (sometimes referred to as a “PWM signal”) for controlling the fan; and (D) a sense circuit configured to convey a tachometer signal corresponding to a fan speed (sometimes referred to in the art more generally as a frequency generator signal, or an “FG” signal). Such an electrical connector is sometimes referred to in the art as a “header” or a “fan header”.
Leak Detectors
A leak detector circuit can be configured to respond to a leak (e.g., moisture or another selected proxy for a leak) of a working fluid detected by a sensor. For example, an innovative leak detector circuit can be configured to emit a first waveform in the absence of a detected leak and to emit a second waveform responsive to a detected leak. Any suitable sensor configured to detect a leak (or other proxy for a leak, e.g., moisture, presence of a working fluid at a position external to a heat-transfer system, a low pressure in the heat-transfer system, a low fluid level in the heat-transfer system) can be used in connection with such an electrical circuit.
As but one of many possible examples of leak-detection sensors, a leak-detection sensor 5 can have a first leak-detection wire 10 and a second leak-detection wire 20, as shown in
A leak can be detected when an open circuit between the first and the second leak-detection wires 10, 20 is closed. For example, a drop 30 of a leaked liquid can span a gap between the first and the second leak-detection wires 10, 20 within the leak-sensitive region 25 of the sensor 5, electrically coupling the first and the second leak-detection wires to each other.
When the circuit between such first and second leak-detection wires 10, 20 is closed, the circuit of the leak detector 5 can emit a corresponding signal indicative of a detected leak. For example, when the first and the second leak-detection wires 10, 20 shown in
In
A conductive fluid spanning the gap between the first and second leak-detection wires 110, 120 can provide a “non-trivial” resistance between the first and the second leak-detection wires. As used herein, a “non-trivial resistance” means a finite resistance sufficient to electrically couple the first and the second leak-detection wires to each other. With a circuit configured as shown in
As indicated in
In some embodiments, the Glue Logic module is configured to monitor the Leak Sense line 122 continuously. In other embodiments, the Glue Logic module is configured to sample the Leak Sense line 122 at defined times (e.g., at selected intervals, or at selected intermittent times). The Glue Logic can also be configured to transmit a signal over an Enable Detect line 123, and, as shown by way of example in
A Glue Logic module can be configured to interrupt operation of a pump motor responsive to a signal received over the Leak Sense line 122 indicative of the existence of a leak (e.g., an electrical coupling between the first and the second leak-detection wires). For example, a Motor Cutoff line 126 can carry a signal emitted by the Glue Logic, and a Motor Control Circuit 127 can respond to a signal received over the Motor Cutoff line 126 by interrupting power to the motor 128. Alternatively (or additionally), the Glue Logic can force an output tachometer signal 129 (e.g., an FG signal) from the Head Module to a logic 0 (e.g., low logic) to signify to a monitoring system that there has been a failure associated with the Head Module.
Many other leak-detection sensor and leak detector circuit configurations are possible. As but several examples, such sensors can include a capacitive moisture sensor, an optical sensor, an infrared sensor, a pressure sensor configured to observe a pressure within the heat-transfer system, a sensor configured to detect a low fluid level in the heat-transfer system, and other sensors now known and hereafter developed.
Some leak detectors can have an electrical circuit operatively coupled to an FG signal pin of a header and be configured, in the absence of a detected leak, to emit a simulated tachometer signal 129 having a waveform similar to a waveform emitted by a properly operating fan.
As an example, a leak detector circuit 225 can be operatively coupled to an available fan header. In response to a detected leak, the simulated signal can be interpreted as by switching a relay as described above in relation to
Alternatively, a leak-detection sensor 225 can be operatively coupled to an electrical circuit associated with one or more pumps 210 of a liquid-based heat-transfer system. For example, such a pump 210 can be electrically coupled to a header 231 having a power pin, a ground pin, a PWM pin and an FG pin. The power pin can be operatively coupled to the pump motor to convey an electrical current to the pump to operate the pump. The PWM pin be operatively coupled to a pump controller and convey a pump-control signal to the pump controller, e.g., to control a speed of the pump. The FG pin can convey monitor a tachometer signal emitted by the pump to a sensing circuit configured to monitor the pump (or fan) speed.
In one example (e.g., shown in
In an alternative embodiment, a leak detector circuit 225 can be operatively coupled between the PWM pin of the fan header 231 and the pump 210. In such an embodiment, the leak detector circuit 225 can interrupt a PWM signal conveyed to the pump 210 by the PWM pin of the fan header and convey an alternative PWM signal (or no PWM signal) to the pump in response to a detected leak. The alternative PWM signal can cause the pump to speed up, to slow down, or to stop. An FG signal emitted by the pump can reflect the change in pump speed. A system configured to monitor the FG signal emitted by the pump can, in response to a reflected change in pump speed, transmit an alert signal (e.g., to a system administrator), a system command (e.g., a command to increase a pump speed of another pump in an attempt to compensate for a diminished performance of a stalled pump, a system-shut-down command, etc.), or both.
In still another alternative embodiment, a leak detector circuit 225 can be operatively coupled between the FG pin of the fan header 231 and the pump 210. In such an embodiment, the leak detector circuit 225 can interrupt an FG signal emitted by the pump and convey an alternative FG signal (or no FG signal) to the FG signal pin in response to a detected leak. The alternative FG signal can simulate a diminished pump speed, a selected increased pump speed, or no pump speed. A system configured to monitor the simulated FG signal can, in response to a selected change in the simulated FG signal corresponding to a change in pump speed, transmit an alert signal (e.g., to a system administrator), a system command (e.g., a command to increase a pump speed of another pump in an attempt to compensate for a diminished performance of a stalled pump, a system-shut-down command, etc.), or both.
A leak sensor 225 can be positioned adjacent to (e.g., routed around) a pump 210 or other component of a liquid-based heat-transfer system, as indicated by way of example in
In
Overview of Flow Sensors
A flow-rate sensor 330 can include a rotational member 332 positioned within a segment of conduit 331 and a tachometer 334 configured to detect a rotational speed of the rotational member. As shown schematically in
Some body portions comprise a thin shell member having opposed first and second sides 337a, 337b. As shown in
A torsional force applied to the rotational member (e.g., member 332) can correspond to a rate of flow of a working fluid past the rotational member, with higher flow rates corresponding to relatively higher torsional forces. For example, a lift force on a wing in a stream of an incompressible fluid can increase in proportion to the square of the speed of the approaching fluid. A lift force applied to the rotational member 332 at a position spaced apart from a central, longitudinal axis 338 applies a turning moment (e.g., a torque, or a torsional force) to the rotational member about the axis 338. The turning moment can urge the rotational member 32 in rotation. In some axisymmetric embodiments of rotational members 332, the turning moment can urge the rotational member 332 in rotation about the central, longitudinal axis 338. The turning moment can correspond to the lift force (torsional force) generated by the flow of the working fluid past the rotational member. Moreover, the speed of rotation of the rotational member 332 can correspond to the torsional force applied to the rotational member. Accordingly, the rotational speed of the rotational member can correspond to the speed of an approaching flow of the fluid. And, a volumetric flow rate (or a mass flow rate) of the fluid through a closed conduit corresponds to the speed of the fluid through the conduit.
Thus, a rotational speed of the rotational member 332 positioned within a fluid conduit can correspond to a volumetric flow rate (or mass flow rate) of a fluid through the conduit 331. Although determining an algebraic expression for a relationship between rotational speed of a given rotational member in a flow of a selected fluid might be possible, such a relationship or correlation can be determined experimentally for each combination of rotational member configuration, conduit configuration, and working fluid.
Though not to scale, the plot in
For example, a conventional flow-rate sensor (e.g., a Venturi-type sensor) can be used to determine each of several selected (mass or volumetric) flow rates of a working fluid, and the tachometer can emit a signal indicative of the rotational speed of the rotational member at each respective flow rate. Each flow-rate/rotational speed pair of readings can be plotted as indicated by the plot shown in
The tachometer can include any of a variety of known and hereafter developed sensor arrangements suitable to detect a rotational speed of the rotational member 331. As but one example, a suitable tachometer can include an optical sensor having an emitter, a detector, and a counter.
For example, the rotational member 332 can be positioned in a conduit 331 having a transparent outer wall 331a, or other suitable port configured to permit a selected frequency range (or band) of electromagnetic radiation (e.g., radiofrequency, X-rays, or light in the infrared, visible, or ultraviolet spectra) to pass therethrough. Although many suitable emitter and detector configurations are possible, the following discussion will refer to the emitter as a light emitter and the detector as a light detector by way of example, and not limitation, for ease of description.
In some embodiments of flow sensors, a light emitter 333 can emit light (e.g., for a duration substantially longer than a period of rotation for the rotational member 332) in a direction toward the rotational member 332, and one or more portions 335 of the rotational member can reflect incident light (or other radiation band) from the emitter 333 toward the light detector 336. The counter 337 can increment a count each time the light detector 336 detects light reflected by the reflective portion 335 of the rotational member 332. Such detection can be responsive to a detected presence of light compared to a detected absence of light, or to a detected absence of light compared to a detected presence of light. With such an arrangement, a rate at which the count increases (e.g., a time-rate-of-change of the count) can correspond to a rate at which the light detector 336 detects a reflection of light from the rotational member 332. In turn, the rate at which the light detector 336 detects a reflection of light from the rotational member 332 can correspond to a rotational speed (i.e., a frequency of rotation, or an angular speed) of the rotational member 332, and thus, as noted above, a rate of flow of a working fluid through a selected conduit.
For example, the rotational member 332 can be configured to reflect incident light toward the detector 336 once per revolution of the rotational member about the axis of rotation, as with the member 332 shown in
The reflector portion 335 can comprise a reflector member positioned on one of the opposed sides 337a, 337b of the thin shell member shown in
As another example, the rotational member 332 can be configured to reflect incident light toward the detector 336 twice per revolution of the rotational member about the axis of rotation. For example, the rotational member 332 can comprise opposed first and second reflective portions (not shown) so arranged relative to the opposed faces 337a, 337b that each of the first and the second reflective portions reflects light toward the detector 36 once during each revolution of the rotational member (i.e., such that light is reflected toward the detector 36 twice per revolution of the rotational member). With such an arrangement, one-half of a rate (or a frequency) at which the count increments in response to detected reflections from the first and the second reflector portions can approximate the angular speed of the rotational member, which in turn can correspond to a rate of flow through the conduit.
In general, the rotational member 332 can be configured to reflect incident light toward the detector N times per revolution of the rotational member about the axis of rotation. With such an arrangement, 1/N of a rate (or a frequency) at which the count increments in response to detected reflections from the rotational member can approximate the angular speed of the rotational member, which in turn can correspond to a rate of flow through the conduit.
The illustrated sensor 330 also has a retainer 360 configured to suspend the rotational member 332 within the conduit 31 in spaced relation from an interior wall 331b of the transparent segment of conduit. Such a suspended arrangement can permit the rotational member 332 to rotate about a selected axis of rotation 338 within the conduit 331 and without being carried away by a flow of a working fluid passing through the conduit.
The retainer 360 can include an upstream retainer member 361 and a downstream retainer member 362. One or both of the retainer members 361, 362 can be configured to urge outwardly against an inner wall 331b of the segment 331a of conduit. In some embodiments, one or both retainer members 361, 362 comprise an elongate member that resiliently urges against the wall 331b, as shown in
In some embodiments, one or both retainer members 361, 362 include a segment 363 configured to matingly engage with a correspondingly configured region of the inner wall 331b of the conduit 331a. As
The rotational member 332 can be rotatably coupled to the retainer 360. For example, a first swivel member 366a can rotatably couple the rotational member 35 to an upstream retainer member 361 and a second swivel member 366b can rotatably couple the rotational member 335 to a downstream retainer member 362, as shown in
The conduit 331a having a rotational member 32 positioned therein can be fluidly coupled in series (or “in-line”) with one or more other components of a fluid circuit 310. Such a placement of the conduit 331a can facilitate measurement of a rate of flow of a working fluid through the one or more components, once a correlation (e.g.,
A flow sensor 330 of the type described herein can be incorporated in a cooling system, such as, for example, a cooling system configured to cool an electronic component or other device that dissipates waste heat during operation. As noted above, a tachometer output of such a flow sensor can indicate a rate of fluid flow through the sensor.
In some embodiments, the output of the tachometer 334 can be multiplexed so as to be compatible with a known or installed communication bus, e.g., over an IPMI bus. As noted above, a computer system incorporating a cooling system can include a controller configured to transmit an alert or other command in response to an observed signal exceeding a selected upper threshold or falling below a selected lower threshold. The observed signal can be emitted by a flow sensor. In some instances, the emitted signal can be emitted by a tachometer 334 configured to observe a rotational speed of a rotational member 332, and the control system can transmit an alert or other command in response to an observed tachometer signal exceeding a selected upper threshold or falling below a selected lower threshold. The upper or lower threshold can correspond to an upper or a lower fluid flow-rate threshold.
As well, or alternatively, a flow-rate sensor, e.g., an optical flow-rate sensor 330 of the type described herein, can emit a simulated fan-tachometer signal in correspondence with an observed flow rate (or indicia thereof). For example, until a lower threshold flow rate (or indicia thereof) is observed by the flow-rate sensor, the sensor can emit a simulated fan-tachometer signal indicative of a given condition of a fan, for example, a stalled fan rotor. Between the lower threshold flow rate (or indicia thereof) and a selected upper threshold observed flow rate (or indicia thereof), the sensor can emit a corresponding simulated fan-tachometer signal indicative of a selected fan speed. As but one example, a correlation can be defined between simulated fan-tachometer speed and observed flow rate (or indicia thereof) between selected upper and lower threshold flow rates (or indicia thereof), as shown in
Some flow-rate sensors can have an electrical circuit operatively coupled to an FG signal pin of a header and be configured to emit a simulated tachometer signal having a waveform similar to a waveform emitted by an operating (or stalled) fan. The electrical circuit (not shown) can be further configured to emit a simulated tachometer signal having a waveform similar to a failed or failing fan in response to an observed flow rate (or indicia thereof) below a selected lower threshold.
A flow-rate sensor can be operatively coupled to a control system associated with one or more pumps of the liquid-based heat-transfer system. The control system can emit a control signal for adjusting operation of one or more pumps in the fluid circuit (e.g., a cooling system) responsively to an observed proxy (or other) signal emitted by a flow-rate sensor.
For example, if the signal emitted by the flow-rate sensor indicates a lower-than-desired flow rate (e.g., based on an observed system workload, such as a microprocessor workload, or read/write traffic across a memory bus), the control system can emit a control signal. Such a control signal can cause a given one or more pump to increase speed, can cause a supplemental pump to become operational, and/or can cause a valve to open (or close), to increase flow rate through a desired portion of a cooling system. Such a control signal can alter an operational state of a computer system. For example, if additional system cooling is unavailable by increasing pump speed, opening a valve, or operating a supplemental pump, the computer system can reduce or limit workload of a subsystem at risk of overheating (e.g., microprocessor workload can be limited or reduced, read/write traffic across a memory bus can be limited or reduced) absent increased cooling.
As another example, if the signal emitted by the flow-rate sensor indicates a higher-than-necessary flow rate (e.g., based on an observed system workload, such as a microprocessor workload, or read/write traffic across a memory bus), the control system can emit a control signal. Such a control signal can cause a given one or more pumps to decrease speed (e.g., to save power and/or lower acoustic emissions by the pump), cause a supplemental pump to slow down or to stop operating, and/or cause a valve to open (or close), decreasing flow rate through a portion of a cooling system to a suitable level.
Other Multiplexed Proxies
As one generalized example, a sensor circuit can be configured to emit a proxy signal corresponding to an observed operational state. Each in a plurality of discrete proxy signals can correspond to each respective observed operational state in a plurality of observable operational states.
In some instances, such a proxy signal can be a simulated fan-tachometer signal. Each discrete simulated fan-tachometer signal can correspond to a respective observed operational state. For example, a simulated fan-tachometer signal corresponding to a fan speed of 200 RPM can constitute a proxy for a selected observed flow rate (or indicia thereof, such as, for example, a rate of increasing count of detected reflections from a reflective portion 35 of a rotational member 32). With such an example, a simulated fan-tachometer signal corresponding to a different fan speed (e.g., 250 RPM) can constitute a proxy for another (e.g., higher) observed flow rate (or indicia thereof) within the system 10.
As another example, a simulated fan-tachometer signal corresponding to a fan speed of 200 RPM can constitute a proxy for an observed first flow rate at a location within the system and a simulated fan-tachometer signal corresponding to a fan speed of 250 RPM can constitute a proxy for an observed second (e.g., different) flow rate.
In some instances, a simulated fan-tachometer signal corresponding to a fan speed of 200 RPM can constitute a proxy for an observed leak at a first location within the system and a simulated fan-tachometer signal corresponding to a fan speed of 250 RPM can constitute a proxy for an observed leak at a second (e.g., different) location within the system.
Such proxy signals can be transmitted over and observed from, for example, the IPMI bus. A controller operatively coupled to the IPMI bus can observe the proxy signal, interpret the observed proxy signal, as by comparison to a lookup table, and, if appropriate, issue one or more selected system commands responsively to the observed or interpreted proxy signal.
By way of illustrate of disclosed principles, the following table summarizes specific examples of proxy signals, proxy signal values and corresponding operational states represented by the proxy signal values:
Computing Environments
With reference to
The storage 1140 may be removable or non-removable, and includes magnetic disks, magnetic tapes or cassettes, CD-ROMs, CD-RWs, DVDs, or any other medium which can be used to store information and which can be accessed within the computing environment 1100. The storage 1140 stores instructions for the software 1180, which can implement technologies described herein.
The input device(s) 1150 may be a touch input device, such as a keyboard, keypad, mouse, pen, or trackball, a voice input device, a scanning device, or another device, that provides input to the computing environment 1100. For audio, the input device(s) 1150 may be a sound card or similar device that accepts audio input in analog or digital form, or a CD-ROM reader that provides audio samples to the computing environment 1100. The output device(s) 1160 may be a display, printer, speaker, CD-writer, or another device that provides output from the computing environment 1100.
The communication connection(s) 1170 enable communication over a communication medium (e.g., a connecting network) to another computing entity. The communication medium conveys information such as computer-executable instructions, compressed graphics information, or other data in a modulated data signal. The data signal can include information pertaining to a physical parameter observed by a sensor or pertaining to a command issued by a controller, e.g., to invoke a change in an operation of a component in the system 10 (
Computer-readable media are any available media that can be accessed within a computing environment 1100. By way of example, and not limitation, with the computing environment 1100, computer-readable media include memory 1120, storage 1140, tangible, non-transitory communication media (not shown), and combinations of any of the above.
Other Exemplary Embodiments
The examples described herein generally concern control systems, with specific examples of control systems being configured to respond to a detected condition or operational state of a liquid-based heat-transfer system, e.g., to issue an alert or other command responsive to a detected leak of a working fluid or to issue an alert or other command responsive to an observed flow rate of a working fluid. As but one example, a pump speed can be adjusted responsive to a signal emitted by a flow-rate sensor. The signal can be indicative of an observed flow rate of working fluid (or an indicia thereof, by way of example, a rotational speed of a rotational member within a segment of conduit). Other embodiments of leak detectors, flow-rate sensors, methods, circuits and/or control systems than those described above in detail are contemplated based on the principles disclosed herein, together with any attendant changes in configurations of the respective apparatus and/or circuits described herein. Incorporating the principles disclosed herein, it is possible to provide a wide variety of control systems configured to issue an alert or other command, and/or, based on a detected change in state or operation (e.g., a detected leak or change in observed flow rate), to adjust an operation of a wide variety of systems, including by way of example, a heat-transfer system for any of a data center, a laser component, a light-emitting diode, a chemical reactor, photovoltaic cells, solar collectors, and a variety of other industrial, military and consumer devices now known and hereafter developed. Moreover, systems disclosed above can be used in combination with other liquid-based systems including, inter alia, reactor vessels.
Directions and references (e.g., up, down, top, bottom, left, right, rearward, forward, etc.) may be used to facilitate discussion of the drawings and principles herein, but are not intended to be limiting. For example, certain terms may be used such as “up,” “down,”, “upper,” “lower,” “horizontal,” “vertical,” “left,” “right,” and the like. Such terms are used, where applicable, to provide some clarity of description when dealing with relative relationships, particularly with respect to the illustrated embodiments. Such terms are not, however, intended to imply absolute relationships, positions, and/or orientations. For example, with respect to an object, an “upper” surface can become a “lower” surface simply by turning the object over. Nevertheless, it is still the same surface and the object remains the same. As used herein, “and/or” means “and” or “or”, as well as “and” and “or.” Moreover, all patent and non-patent literature cited herein is hereby incorporated by references in its entirety for all purposes.
The principles described above in connection with any particular example can be combined with the principles described in connection with any one or more of the other examples. Accordingly, this detailed description shall not be construed in a limiting sense, and following a review of this disclosure, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate the wide variety of fluid heat exchange systems that can be devised using the various concepts described herein. Moreover, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein can be adapted to various configurations without departing from the disclosed principles.
The previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the disclosed innovations. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein can be adapted to various configurations and/or uses without departing from the disclosed principles. For example, the principles described above in connection with any particular example can be combined with the principles described in connection with another example described herein. Various modifications to those embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of this disclosure. Accordingly, this detailed description shall not be construed in a limiting sense, and following a review of this disclosure, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate the wide variety of filtering and computational techniques can be devised using the various concepts described herein.
Similarly, the presently claimed inventions are not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein, but are to be accorded the full scope consistent with the language of the claims, wherein reference to an element in the singular, such as by use of the article “a” or “an” is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless specifically so stated, but rather “one or more”. All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the various embodiments described throughout the disclosure that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are intended to be encompassed by the features described and claimed herein. Moreover, nothing disclosed herein is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether such disclosure is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element is to be construed under the provisions of 35 USC 112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or “step for”.
Thus, in view of the many possible embodiments to which the disclosed principles can be applied, we reserve the right to claim any and all combinations of features described herein, including the right to claim all that comes within the scope and spirit of the foregoing description, as well as within combinations recited in the following claims, literally and under the doctrine of equivalents.
This U.S. National Phase patent application is filed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 371(b) from International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2014/059768, filed on Mar. 14, 2014, and claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Patent Application No. 61/793,479, filed Mar. 15, 2013, U.S. Patent Application No. 61/805,418, filed Mar. 26, 2013, U.S. Patent Application No. 61/856,566, filed Jul. 19, 2013, U.S. Patent Application No. 61/880,081, filed Sep. 19, 2013, each of which patent applications is hereby incorporated by reference in its respective entirety as fully as if fully recited in full herein, for all purposes.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/IB2014/059768 | 3/14/2014 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2014/141162 | 9/18/2014 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3073385 | Peters | Jan 1963 | A |
| 3481393 | Chu | Dec 1969 | A |
| 3939328 | Davis | Feb 1976 | A |
| 4340111 | Skala | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4450472 | Tuckerman et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4520298 | Abbondanti | May 1985 | A |
| 4561040 | Eastman et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4564040 | Rudelick | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4750086 | Mittal | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4758926 | Herrell et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4768581 | Gotwald et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4777578 | Jahns | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4898153 | Sherwood | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4909315 | Nelson et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4940085 | Nelson et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5016090 | Galyon et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5070936 | Carroll et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5099311 | Bonde et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5142214 | Purson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5203401 | Hamburgen et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5218515 | Bernhardt | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5265670 | Zingher | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5294830 | Young et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5309319 | Messina | May 1994 | A |
| 5441102 | Burward-Hoy | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5453641 | Mundinger et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5522452 | Mizuno et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5535818 | Fujisaki et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5592363 | Atarashi et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5628199 | Hoglund et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5636653 | Titus | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5646824 | Ohashi et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5684671 | Hobbs et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5727618 | Mundinger et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5731954 | Cheon | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5823249 | Batchelder | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5835347 | Chu | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5864464 | Lin | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5875637 | Paetow | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5998240 | Hamilton et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6019165 | Batchelder | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6035655 | Hare et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6256378 | Iggulden et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6327145 | Lian et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330525 | Hays et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6415853 | Tao et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6415860 | Kelly et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6447270 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6470289 | Peters et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6679315 | Cosley et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6702002 | Wang | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6769258 | Pierson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6775137 | Chu et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6792373 | Tabor | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6819563 | Chu et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6827128 | Philpott et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6883347 | Ayub | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6952345 | Weber et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6970355 | Ellsworth, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6973801 | Campbell et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6986382 | Upadhya et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6988534 | Kenny et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6993421 | Pillar et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7000684 | Kenny et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7007506 | Kubo et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7012807 | Chu et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7021367 | Oikawa | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7029647 | Tonkovich et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7032651 | Winslow et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7044198 | Matsushima et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7057893 | Nicolai et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7086247 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7104312 | Goodson et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7123996 | Fukushima et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7124811 | Crocker et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7131486 | Goodson et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7143816 | Ghosh et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7149084 | Matsushima et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7156159 | Lovette et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7190580 | Bezama et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7201217 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7206203 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7209355 | Koga et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7221270 | Chen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7264359 | Kawahara et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7274566 | Campbell et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7278273 | Whitted et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7301771 | Hata et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7315448 | Bash et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7318322 | Ota et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7331378 | Bhatti et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7360582 | Olesen | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7397661 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7455103 | Sato et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7466549 | Dorrich et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7466553 | Hamman | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7484530 | Harvey et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7486513 | Hall et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7527085 | Iijima et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7591302 | Lenehan et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7599184 | Upadhya et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7639499 | Campbell et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7688589 | Chiang | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7757506 | Ellsworth, Jr. et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7762314 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7791882 | Chu et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7806168 | Upadhya et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7905106 | Attlesey | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7925746 | Melton | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7944694 | Campbell et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7957144 | Goettert et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7961465 | Goldrian et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7969727 | Tozer et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7971632 | Eriksen | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7978472 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8051898 | Chiang | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8066057 | Olesen | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8240362 | Eriksen | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8245764 | Eriksen | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8250879 | MacBain et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8427831 | Wei | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8437129 | Tung et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8441789 | Wu et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8493738 | Chainer et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8499761 | Jorczak | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8631860 | Tang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8724315 | Branton | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8746330 | Lyon | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 9052252 | Lyon et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9057567 | Lyon | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9453691 | Lyon | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9496200 | Lyon et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9603284 | Lyon | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 20020070007 | Calaman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020153885 | Blossfeld | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020189790 | Wong | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030019234 | Wayburn et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030070792 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030085028 | Galtz | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030151130 | Cheon | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030230400 | McCordic et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040008483 | Cheon | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040040695 | Chesser et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040042171 | Takamatsu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040042172 | Kusaka et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040057211 | Kondo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040100770 | Chu et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040104010 | Kenny et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040104012 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040104022 | Kenny et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040112585 | Goodson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040123614 | Stewart | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040160741 | Moss | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040182548 | Lovette et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040182560 | Kenny et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040188066 | Upadhya et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040188069 | Tomioka | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040206477 | Kenny et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040221604 | Ota et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040240179 | Koga et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050069432 | Tomioka | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050126747 | Chu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050128705 | Chu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050178531 | Huang et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050180107 | Naganawa et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050205241 | Goodson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050211417 | Upadhya et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050241809 | Tomioka et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050259397 | Bash et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050269061 | Brewer et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060002080 | Leija et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060002088 | Bezama et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060011329 | Wang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060096738 | Kang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060096740 | Zheng | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060096743 | Lee et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060137863 | Lee et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060143439 | Arumugam et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060162903 | Bhatti et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060171801 | Manabe et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060185829 | Duan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060185830 | Duan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187638 | Vinson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060225867 | Park et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060231238 | Ball, Jr. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060254755 | Chen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070029069 | Duan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070034356 | Kenny et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070039719 | Eriksen | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070095512 | Chen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070107886 | Chen | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070125526 | Satou et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070131396 | Yu et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070163750 | Bhatti et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070193724 | Lin | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070227704 | Nagai et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070227710 | Belady et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070256957 | Herrmann et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070272314 | Packham | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070272392 | Ghosh et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070297136 | Konshak | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080053641 | Lai et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080128114 | Lai et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080179045 | Hu et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080205003 | Belady | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080225478 | Goettert et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288124 | Huang | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080304236 | Murakami et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090071625 | Lyon | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090101315 | Cheng | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090120622 | Koch | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090139698 | Robinson | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090154096 | Iyengar et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228893 | Behrendt et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090306833 | Vinson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090322543 | Crnkovich et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100065355 | Reddy | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100085708 | Martin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100101765 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100103620 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100139887 | Slessman | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100179695 | Collins et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100182809 | Cullinane et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100206869 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100211669 | Dalgas et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100324962 | Nesler et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100326634 | Eriksen | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110084839 | Groth et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110100045 | Carlson | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110100618 | Carlson | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110115223 | Stahlkopf et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110127027 | Kashirajima et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110154842 | Heydari et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110168379 | Morgan et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110174001 | Carlson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110175498 | Bash et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110303394 | Branton | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110313576 | Nicewonger | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120103009 | Ding et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120147553 | Eriksen | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120152498 | Lyon | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120175094 | Rice | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120271567 | Da Pont | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120273159 | Eriksen | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130025818 | Lyon et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130107453 | Chainer et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130288630 | Suzuki | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140103950 | Janitch | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140158326 | Lyon | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140186156 | Lai | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140251582 | Lyon | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140262180 | Lyon et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140266744 | Lyon | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150083368 | Lyon | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150108934 | Wong | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150168474 | Yoshioka | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150355630 | Cader et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160281704 | Lyon et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160377355 | Lyon | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170064874 | Lyon et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170196116 | Lyon | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 102483242 | May 2012 | CN |
| 20 2012 002 974 | Jul 2012 | DE |
| 1 808 892 | Jul 2007 | EP |
| 61-32449 | Feb 1986 | JP |
| 06-120387 | Apr 1994 | JP |
| 7-183678 | Jul 1995 | JP |
| 10-173114 | Jun 1998 | JP |
| 2001-255027 | Sep 2001 | JP |
| 2002-151638 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2003-243581 | Aug 2003 | JP |
| 2005-351600 | Dec 2005 | JP |
| 2007-180505 | Jul 2007 | JP |
| 2007-227902 | Sep 2007 | JP |
| 2007-531991 | Nov 2007 | JP |
| 2008-140879 | Jun 2008 | JP |
| 2009-529621 | Aug 2009 | JP |
| 2011-114206 | Jun 2011 | JP |
| 3179086 | Oct 2012 | JP |
| M273031 | Aug 2005 | TW |
| M298733 | Oct 2006 | TW |
| I266039 | Nov 2006 | TW |
| 201305522 | Feb 2013 | TW |
| 201320883 | May 2013 | TW |
| 201441626 | Nov 2014 | TW |
| 0165900 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| 03055055 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| 2005017468 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| 2005096377 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| 2006052317 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2007029253 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2014141162 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 15/354,928, dated Oct. 9, 2018, 9 pages. |
| Ellsworth, M.J. Jr. et al., “The Evolution of Water Cooling for IBM Large Server Systems: Back to the Future,” IEEE, CoolIT Systems Inc. Exhibit 1017, pp. 1-9, (2008). |
| Ellsworth, M.J. Jr. P.E., “Thermal Design and Implementation of Robust Liquid Cooling Systems for High Performance Computer Systems,” Systems and Technology Group, IBM, InterPACK '11, dated Jul. 6-8, 2011, pp. 1-64. |
| Kandlikar, S.G., “High Flux Heat Removal with Microchannels. A Roadmap of Challenges and Opportunities,” Heat Transfer Engineering. vol. 26 No. 8 : 5-14, (2005), pp. 5-14. |
| Knight, R.W., et al., “Heat Sink Optimization with Application to Microchannels,” IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology, vol. 15, No. 5, Oct. 1992, pp. 832-842. |
| Merriam-webster definition of beveled, dated Jan. 26, 2016, retrieved from internet URL: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/beveled, pp. 1-4. |
| Schmidt, R.R., “Liquid Cooling is Back,” Electronics Cooling Magazine, Published Aug. 1, 2005, Retrieved from the Internet URL: https://www.electronics-cooling.com/2005/08/liquid-cooling-is-back/, on Apr. 30, 2014, pp. 1-7. |
| Steinke, M., and Kandlikar, S.G., “Single-Phase Heat Transfer Enhancement Techniques in Microchannel and Minichannels Flows,” Microchannels and Minichannels—2004, published on Jun. 17-19, 2004, Rochaster, New York, pp. 1-8. |
| Torres, G., “CoolIT Water-Cooling Products,” Published Jan. 14, 2008, Retrieved from Internet URL: http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/coolit-water-cooling-products/3/, on Apr. 24, 2014, pp. 1-9. |
| Vertal, L., “Water Cooling Comes of Age, Again,” Asetek Data Center Liquid Cooling, Published on Oct. 11, 2013, Retrieved from the Internet URL: htt5s://www.aseteck.com/press-room/blog/2013/water-cooling-comes-of-age-again/, on Nov. 9, 2015, pp. 1-4. |
| Examination Report in European Patent Application No. 07075014.6, dated Mar. 11, 2011. |
| Requirement Restriction for U.S. Appl. No. 12/189,476, dated Jan. 24, 2012. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/189,476, dated Apr. 13, 2012. |
| English translation of Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2012-002117, dated May 7, 2012. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/189,476, dated Jan. 7, 2013. |
| English translation of Technical Opinion for Japanese Utility Model Application No. 2012-002117, dated Jan. 10, 2013 (Registration No. 3179086). |
| English translation of Second Technical Opinion for Japanese Utility Model Application No. 2012-002117 dated Jul. 19, 2013 (Registration No. 3179086). |
| English translation of Chinese-language Search and Examination Reports for Taiwan Patent Application No. 101110072 dated Apr. 9, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/189,476, dated Apr. 28, 2014. |
| Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,443, dated May 22, 2014. |
| Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 14/210,165, dated Jun. 12, 2014. |
| Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,163, dated Jun. 13, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/IB2014/059768, dated Jul. 9, 2014. |
| Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,749,968; United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the 5 Patent Trial and Appeal Board, CoolIT Systems, Inc. v. Asetek A/S, Inter Partes Review No. 2014-01172, Jul. 16, 2014; 61 pages. |
| Requirement Restriction for U.S. Appl. No. 13/401,618, dated Sep. 18, 2014. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/210,165, dated Sep. 29, 2014. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,163, dated Sep. 30, 2014. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,443, dated Oct. 30, 2014. |
| Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 13/559,340, dated Oct. 31, 2014. |
| English Translation of Examination and Search Report for Taiwan Application No. 103109612, dated Jan. 1, 2015. |
| Third Party Preissuance Submission for U.S. Appl. No. 13/559,340, mailed Jan. 9, 2015. |
| Preissuance submission for U.S. Appl. No. 13/401,618, mailed Jan. 9, 2015. |
| Ex Parte Quayle Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/210,165, mailed Feb. 5, 2015. |
| Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,952, dated Feb. 5, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/210,165, dated Feb. 20, 2015. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/559,340, dated Mar. 26, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,443, dated Apr. 30, 2015. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,163, dated May 14, 2015. |
| English Translation of Examination and Search Report for Taiwan Application No. 101127180, dated May 21, 2015. |
| Petition for Inter Parties Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,746,330 in Asetek Danmark A/S v. CoolIT Systems Inc. filed May 27, 2015. |
| Declaration of Dr. Donald Tilton (including his CV) from Petition for Inter Parties Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,746,330 in Asetek Danmark A/S v. CoolIT Systems Inc. dated May 27, 2015. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,952, dated Jul. 7, 2015. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/401,618, dated Jul. 28, 2015. |
| Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,163, dated Aug. 3, 2015. |
| Non-Final Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,163, dated Sep. 4, 2015. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/559,340, dated Sep. 8, 2015. |
| Office Action for Taiwan Application No. 103109612, dated Sep. 21, 2015. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,952, dated Oct. 20, 2015. |
| Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/559,340, dated Dec. 2, 2015. |
| Osinski, United States Patent and Trademark Office Decision of Institution of Inter Partes Review. Filed Dec. 9, 2015 in Case IPR2015-01276. |
| English translation of Notice of Allowance in Taiwan Application No. 103109612, dated Dec. 11, 2015. |
| Non-Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 15/351,362, dated Feb. 7, 2019, 20 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/559,340, dated Jan. 15, 2016. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/401,618, dated Jan. 26, 2016. |
| English translation of Notice of Allowance in Taiwan Application No. 101127180, dated Feb. 19, 2016. |
| Pollard, United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Owner's Response. Filed Mar. 9, 2016 in Case PR2015-01276. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,163, dated Jun. 15, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/401,618, dated Jul. 27, 2016. |
| Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,080, dated Sep. 21, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/559,340, dated Sep. 23, 2016. |
| USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board Final Written Decision in Case IPR2015-01276 dated Dec. 8, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,163, dated Jan. 19, 2017. |
| English translation of Examination Report in Taiwan Application No. 101110072, dated Feb. 8, 2017. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/263,210, dated Feb. 10, 2017. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,080, dated Mar. 9, 2017. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/462,753, dated May 11, 2017. |
| English translation of Notice of Allowance in Taiwan Application No. 101110072, dated Aug. 17, 2017. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/462,753, dated Sep. 15, 2017. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/263,210, dated Oct. 30, 2017. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,080, dated Nov. 1, 2017. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160281704 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61880081 | Sep 2013 | US | |
| 61856566 | Jul 2013 | US | |
| 61805418 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61793479 | Mar 2013 | US |
