Separation device for microparticles involving a magnetic rod

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6448092
  • Patent Number
    6,448,092
  • Date Filed
    Friday, January 21, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 10, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
The invention relates to a means for separating magnetic particles from a composition. The means comprises an elongated protective cover (1) that comprises a recess (2) extending from the upper end towards the lower end thereof, the recess comprising a movable magnetic rod (4), the proportion of the length of the rod to its thickness being at least about 2:1. The invention can be used in different applications especially in the fields of biotechnology, biochemistry, and biomedicine. Collecting particles by using the means is easy and fast.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




The invention relates to the separation of magnetic particles from a composition. The invention can be used in different applications, especially in the fields of biotechnology, biochemistry, and biomedicine.




TECHNICAL BACKGROUND




Magnetic microparticles are used as a solid phase in various applications to bind biomaterial. One advantage of microparticles is the large area of the solid phase and short diffusion lengths. The size of microparticles is generally 0.05-10 μm and they are available in different materials and already activated for many applications. Magnetic particles can be moved by using a magnet.




The separation methods of magnetic particles currently used include settling a reaction vessel in a magnetic field so that particles are accumulated into a so-called pellet at the bottom of the vessel. Thereafter, the liquid which is free from particles is decanted or removed by aspiration. However, the removing of the liquid from the vessel must be carried out very carefully so as not to remove the particles at the same time.




Publication WO-86/06493 proposes a method to be used in immunoassays, in which magnetic particles and the marked complex adhered to them are separated from a liquid by using a magnetic rod and subsequently taken to be measured. The tip of the rod comprises a fixed magnet and a removable protective cover to whose outer surface the particles adhere. It is preferable to cover the protective cover with another cover after the separation and before measuring. After the measurement, the protective covers are detached together with the particles and thrown away and new covers are taken for a new separation. According to the publication, the magnet can also be an electromagnet, whereby the magnetic field can be eliminated when desired.




Publication WO-87/05536 proposes a device for separating magnetic particles, comprising, on the inside, a rod movable in a vertical boring and a magnet at the lower end thereof. The device is introduced, with the magnet in the lower position, into a liquid containing particles, whereby the particles are accumulated on the end of the rod. When the magnet is allowed into the upper position, the particles can be detached from the rod. In this way, particles can be collected and transferred from one liquid into another.




However, the disclosed separation devices and methods for magnetic particles cannot be applied very well in applications in which particles must be collected from a fairly large volume and transferred into an essentially smaller one.




DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




General Description




Now, a separation method according to claim


1


has been invented. The other claims present some preferred embodiments of the invention.




The device according to the invention comprises an elongated protective cover that includes a movable rod comprising one rod magnet in the longitudinal direction of the cover. The proportion of the length of the rod magnet to its thickness is at least about 2:1, preferably at least about 3:1, and most preferably at least about 12:1. Both the intensity and the gradient of the magnetic field thus formed are the strongest at the end of the rod and when the magnet is in the lower position, the particles from the composition are accumulated directly on the tip of the cover. Particles can be released from the tip of the cover into a volume which is many times smaller than the original composition.




The rod magnet preferably consists of a permanent magnet and a ferromagnetic arm which is its extension.




The rod magnet is preferably sufficiently long so that the upper end of its dipole always remains above the surface of the compound. If particles are to be collected from a compound column higher than the dipole, it must be seen to that the particles from the upper part of the column are first collected on the tip so that the upper end of the dipole is constantly above the particles.




Since the upper end of the magnet can be above the compound, a more effective magnet with respect to the volume of the compound can be used, accelerating and facilitating the collection.




The device according to the invention comprises, in the tip of the protective cover, an intensive magnetic field in the direction of the cover. This is especially advantageous when particles are collected from a concentration of particles which has first been created in some other way. An additional advantage is that a high retaining strength can be provided directly in the tip from which the adhesion of the liquid particularly tends to detach particles when the protective cover is lifted off the liquid.




The tip of the protective cover is preferably provided with a sharp downward projection. This minimises the amount of liquid remaining in the tip. Typically, the tip is shaped like a cone. When transferring particles into very small vessels, the tip is preferably shaped as a cone with a concave surface.




When a ferromagnetic arm is used in the magnet, the magnet and the magnetised arm together function as a long rod magnet. The arm dissolves the gradient of the upper pole of the field, whereby the upper pole does not carry out the collection of particles. In this way, the long rod magnet can be provided at a low cost. However, even with a ferromagnetic arm, it is advantageous to use a relatively long magnet (with a length of about 1.5 . . . 10 times the thickness). The length of the magnet is preferably selected so that a maximum internal, permanent field intensity is provided for the magnet in question.




The junction between the magnet and its arm is preferably made so that the arm and the magnet come inside one another for a short length. In this way, the formation of strong gradients at the junction, which may possibly collect particles, is avoided.




The cross-section of the rod magnet can be, e.g., circular or rectangular. The circular shape is the best with respect to both manufacture and use. Indeed, the rotation of the magnet on its axis, for example, has no effect in this case. In principle, the rod can be curved to make the moving mechanisms simpler.




The shape of the protective cover on the rod can vary according to the use.




Normally, the circular shape is the most advantageous with respect to both manufacture and use. In order to increase strength, the cover can be made conical, which also facilitates the manufacture of the cover by injection moulding. The cover is preferably made of polypropylene.




The invention is best-adapted to be used for particles of about 1-10 μm.











DRAWINGS




Some preferred applications of the invention are described in the following as examples. In the drawings of the description:





FIG. 1

presents a separation means according to the invention,





FIG. 2

presents the use of the means of

FIG. 1

for collecting particles from a suspension,





FIG. 3

presents the use of the means of

FIG. 1

to release the collected particles into a very small vessel,





FIG. 4

presents the use of another means according to the invention for collecting particles from the wall of a test tube,





FIG. 5

presents the use of a third means according to the invention for collecting particles from a small amount of liquid; and





FIG. 6

presents the use of the means of

FIG. 5

for releasing the collected particles into a small amount of liquid.











EXAMPLES




The separation rod according to

FIG. 1

comprises an elongated protective cover


1


and a boring


2


in it. The lower ends of the cover and the boring are slightly tapered. The upper end of the body is provided with flange


3


which facilitates gripping.




Boring


2


comprises loose magnetic rod


4


. This comprises vertical rod magnet


5


at the lower end thereof, and ferromagnetic arm


6


above it as an extension of the magnet. Gripping knob


7


is provided at the end of the arm.




The lower end of the cover is provided with a tapering, sharp-edged tip


8


with a concave surface. The length of the tip corresponds approximately to the width of the lower end of the cover.





FIG. 2

presents the collection of particles from a test tube where they are dispersed in suspension


9


. The separation rod is moved in the test tube by sweeps up and down. In this way, particles can be collected at the tip to form an annular mass


10


. When magnet


5


is kept in the lower end of boring


2


, the particles remain attached to the tip. When particles are to be released, the magnet is lifted up.




Tip


8


is especially well-adapted to transfer particles into a very small vessel, such as the well of a so-called HLA plate


11


(FIG.


3


). The tip is slightly longer than the height of the well. When the tip is pushed into the well, the surface of the liquid rises along the surface of the tip due to surface tension. The edge of the moving surface of liquid sweeps the particles off the tip and into the liquid. The detachment can be improved by stirring the rod. Correspondingly, when the tip is lifted from the well, the surface of the liquid moves towards the sharp end of the tip as an integral film. In this way, the liquid and the particles with it are completely detached from the tip.




The particles are preferably detached from the liquid so that they are first concentrated into one spot in the vessel from where they are then collected by using the rod. The concentration can be effected by letting the particles settle by gravitation, by centrifuging or by pulling the particles onto the wall of the vessel by using a magnetic field.





FIG. 4

presents the collection of particles from the wall of a test tube on which they were first pulled, by using a magnet, to form a vertical strip


9


. By sweeping along the strip by the tip of the rod, the particles can be made to adhere to the tip of the protective cover


1


of the rod to form mass


10


. Here the tip of protective cover


1


is shaped like a relatively blunt cone. This is well-adapted for transferring particles into vessels where the tip can be pushed properly into the liquid.




The proportion of the length of magnet


5


to the diameter is about 10:1, and the proportion of the length of the arm to the length of the magnet is about 5:1. The arm is slightly wider than the magnet and the upper end of the magnet is embedded inside the lower end of the arm at a length of about twice its diameter.





FIGS. 5 and 6

present a separation device including a magnetic rod


4


′ which comprises only a permanent magnet


5


′ coated with a suitable protective layer but no ferromagnetic arm. The upper end of protective cover


1


′ is provided with a gripping portion


3


′ with two flanges which enables the easy control of the device in automatic separation or analysis devices, for instance. The proportion of the length of the magnet to the diameter is about 7:1. The tip of the cover is shaped like a relatively blunt cone (the height of the cone being about ⅓ of its width).





FIG. 5

presents the separation of particles from a relatively narrow vessel compared with the separation rod (the inner diameter of the vessel is about 70% of the diameter of the rod) and from a relatively small amount of liquid. Lower line


11


presents the free surface of liquid and upper line


12


the surface of liquid when the separation means is pushed into the liquid. Magnetic particles are accumulated at the tip of the protective cover to form mass


10


which can be released back into a relatively small amount of liquid (FIG.


6


).




The means of

FIGS. 5 and 6

is well-adapted to be used in the wells of microtitration plates with diameters of about 7 mm.



Claims
  • 1. A method for separating magnetic particles from a liquid composition in a vessel, comprising:(a) providing a separator for separating the magnetic particles, comprising: (i) an elongated permanent magnet having two poles; and (ii) a protective cover adapted to receive the elongated magnet, wherein the protective cover is movable with respect to the magnet;(b) placing the separator into the vessel containing the composition to accumulate the particles from the composition on the protective cover, wherein one of said poles of the elongated magnet remains above a surface of the liquid composition; and (c) removing the separator, along with the particles, from the vessel.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the particles are a solid phase to bind biomaterial.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the particles are microparticles.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the microparticles have a diameter of about 0.05 μm-10 μm.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the magnet comprises two ends free of ferromagnetic connection.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 or 5 wherein only one of said poles remains above the surface and the other pole is below the surface.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the separator is sized for use in a well of a microtitration plate.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the well of the microtitration plate has a diameter of about 7 mm.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the proportion of a length of the elongated magnet to its thickness is at least about 2:1.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the proportion of a length of the elongated magnet to its thickness is at least about 3:1.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the proportion of a length of the elongated magnet to its thickness is at least about 7:1.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the protective cover has a tip, and wherein the tip is shaped like a cone.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein a height of the cone is about one-third of a width of the cone.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the protective cover has an upper end, and a first flange is located at the upper end of the protective cover.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the protective cover has an upper end, and a second flange is located at the upper end of the protective cover.
  • 16. The method of claim 1, wherein the protective cover is made out of plastic.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, further comprising releasing the particles from the separator for separating into a further vessel by moving the protective cover with respect to the magnet.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
944937 Oct 1994 FI
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/817,688, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,207,463 which is a 371 of PCT/F195/00577 Oct. 20, 1995 filed Apr. 18, 1997 (102e filing date Jun. 3, 1997), entitled “Separation Device for Microparticles Involving A Magnetic Rod”.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/FI95/00577 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO96/12958 5/2/1996 WO A
US Referenced Citations (37)
Number Name Date Kind
2471764 Miller et al. May 1949 A
2683618 Long Jul 1954 A
2970002 Laviano Jan 1961 A
3904482 Mehl Sep 1975 A
3970518 Giaever Jul 1976 A
3985649 Eddelman Oct 1976 A
4018886 Giaever Apr 1977 A
4115535 Giaever Sep 1978 A
4197287 Piasio et al. Apr 1980 A
4200613 Alfrey et al. Apr 1980 A
4225575 Piasio et al. Sep 1980 A
4261815 Kelland Apr 1981 A
4272510 Smith et al. Jun 1981 A
4438068 Forrest Mar 1984 A
4495151 Ohyama et al. Jan 1985 A
4649116 Daty et al. Mar 1987 A
4681742 Johnson et al. Jul 1987 A
4731337 Luotola et al. Mar 1988 A
4751053 Dodin et al. Jun 1988 A
4891321 Hubscher Jan 1990 A
4895650 Wang Jan 1990 A
5066390 Rhodes et al. Nov 1991 A
5167926 Kimura et al. Dec 1992 A
5200084 Liberti et al. Apr 1993 A
5206034 Yamazaki Apr 1993 A
5316151 Thompson May 1994 A
5318914 Matte et al. Jun 1994 A
5340749 Fujiwara et al. Aug 1994 A
5466574 Liberti et al. Nov 1995 A
5474742 Tuuminen Dec 1995 A
5647994 Tuunanen et al. Jul 1997 A
5942124 Tuunanen Aug 1999 A
6020211 Tuunanen Feb 2000 A
6040192 Tuunanen Mar 2000 A
6065605 Korpela et al. May 2000 A
6197597 Tuunanen Mar 2001 B1
6207463 Tuunanen Mar 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (26)
Number Date Country
2824742 Feb 1979 DE
0 027 008 Apr 1981 EP
0186001 Jul 1986 EP
0042755 Aug 1988 EP
0317286 May 1989 EP
0351857 Jan 1990 EP
0358948 Mar 1990 EP
0479448 Apr 1992 EP
0522322 Jan 1993 EP
1414479 Nov 1975 GB
2147698 May 1985 GB
58-5656 Jan 1983 JP
58-5657 Jan 1983 JP
58-5658 Jan 1983 JP
63-5263 Jan 1988 JP
63-5265 Jan 1988 JP
63-5266 Jan 1988 JP
WO 8606493 Nov 1986 WO
WO 8705536 Sep 1987 WO
WO 9418564 Aug 1994 WO
WO 9418565 Aug 1994 WO
WO 9500247 Jan 1995 WO
WO 9612958 May 1996 WO
WO 9612959 May 1996 WO
WO 9612960 May 1996 WO
WO 9612961 May 1996 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
“A1NiCo Rod Magnets”, IBS Magnet, Ing. K.-H. Scroeter, Kurfürstenstrasse 92, 12105 Berlin, Germany, p. 15.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/817688 Jun 1997 US
Child 09/489051 US