Separation membranes formed from perforated graphene and methods for use thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9844757
  • Patent Number
    9,844,757
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 12, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 19, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
Perforated graphene sheets can be used in forming separation membranes. Separation membranes of the present disclosure, which can be used in gas separation processes in some embodiments, can include one or more polymer layers and one or more layers of perforated graphene. Methods for separating a gas mixture can include contacting a gas mixture with the separation membranes, and transiting one or more of the gases through the perforated graphene so as to affect separation.
Description
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not applicable.


FIELD

The present disclosure generally relates to separation processes, and, more specifically, to separation membranes containing graphene or other two dimensional materials and methods for use and fabrication thereof.


BACKGROUND

Gas species separation from mixtures represents an important industrial and economic process. In the natural gas production industry, for example, almost all raw (as-produced) natural gas is processed to remove various contaminants and non-valued gases before downstream utilization, such as introducing it as a product into a pipeline transportation system. For example, co-produced gases such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide, especially in combination with water, can heavily impact the value of as-produced natural gas. Production of unconventional gas sources such as shale plays and coal beds is increasing and driving a need for more efficient and affordable processing systems at more remote sites and with higher contaminant gas level processing capabilities. Contaminants in other types of gases can also be problematic and can impact their valuation, as well as the applicability of various industrial processes. For example, CO2 and contaminant capture from industrial flue gas, hydrogen purification and recovery processes, syngas production, and fuel cells represent non-limiting areas that can benefit from gas separation technology.


Separation membranes are commonly used for gas separation processes in a variety of industrial settings, including speciation of natural gas. Gas separation membranes are attractive for use in gas phase separation processes because they generally possess no or few moving parts, require low maintenance, exhibit low energy consumption, and possess exceptional reliability. However, many conventional membranes are not highly efficient, can be chemically unstable in certain instances, and do not compete well with bulk separation processes (non-membrane). For example, illustrative bulk carbon dioxide separation technologies can include cryogenic separation, pressure-temperature adsorption cycles, CO2 capture with amines, and the like. CO2 separation membranes, in contrast, can operate well at high CO2 concentrations, but can be less effective at modest H2S concentrations. Nevertheless, with proper process design, membrane-based gas separation processes can be used to simplify overall process design and be more convenient for deployment in remote field locations.


Specialized polymer membranes have been developed for use in specific gas separation applications. Examples include cellulose acetate membranes for CO2 separations in “sour gas” conditions, polyimide membranes, and polyamide membranes. Many different polymers are used in this regard, as different polymers have utility and affinity for use with different gas species, allowing certain gases to transit the membrane in preference to others. The transit mechanism can depend on specific interactions between gas and polymer molecules that affect gas dissolution and diffusion through the polymer. The polymer is generally chosen to enhance these interactions for the target gases and enhance the permeation rate of a desired gas over the permeation rate of an undesired gas. Generally, a membrane is considered to give an adequate separation of two gases from one another if the permeation ratio of the two gases is about 10:1 or above, although other permeation ratios can also be adequate depending on the intended application in which the gas will be used. Although widely used, existing polymer membranes can display inadequate performance for certain gas mixtures or not be applicable to certain types of process conditions. For example, chemical stability of the polymer membrane under certain process conditions can represent a concern.


In view of the foregoing, improved techniques for gas separation, particularly using membrane technology, would be of considerable benefit in the art. The present disclosure satisfies this need and provides related advantages as well.


SUMMARY

The present disclosure describes separation membranes containing at least one layer of a polymer and at least one layer of a perforated two-dimensional material, particularly perforated graphene. Methods for preparing the separation membranes can include stacking one or more layers of polymer and one or more layers of the two-dimensional material upon one another. The two-dimensional material can be perforated before or after being stacked with the polymer layers. In specific embodiments, the two-dimensional material is a graphene-based material such as a graphene-based sheet. In an embodiment, the at least one layer of polymer exhibits a selected permeability for a first elected gas with respect to one or more other gases. In specific embodiments, the at least one layer of polymer is non-porous or dense. In specific embodiments, the at least one layer of polymer exhibits permeance to one or more gases via one or more solution diffusion processes.


Separation processes using the separation membranes described herein can be accomplished by contacting a gas mixture with the separation membrane. In an embodiment, the gas mixture comprises a first and a second gas. By perforating the two-dimensional material, such as graphene, with perforations or apertures that are of a sufficient size to allow increased transit of a desired gas through the membrane over that of one or more undesired gases, or vice versa, separation of the gas mixture can take place. Separation of two or more species in a mixture includes at least a change in the ratio(s) (weight or molar ratio) of the two or more species in the gas mixture after passage of the mixture through a perforated two-dimensional material or through the composite separation membranes herein. It will be appreciated that separation of a desired gas component from an undesired component can be achieved by retarding passage of the undesired species with respect to the desired species or by retarding passage of the desired species with respect to the undesired species. Separation processes herein may include multiple passages of a given gas mixture through a given separation membrane or passage of a gas mixture through multiple separation membranes.


In an aspect, the invention provides separation membranes comprising at least one dense polymeric membrane and at least one layer of a perforated two dimensional material. The dense polymer membrane can operate normally by solution-diffusion processes, giving some initial separation of gas species. The filter of perforated two dimensional material (i.e., perforated graphene layers) can block or limit passage of molecules larger than the holes in the two dimensional material, while at the same time permitting passage of smaller molecules. Thus, the composite membrane can separate gas species by two complementary mechanisms: solution-diffusion at the polymer (i.e., molecule-polymer interaction) and molecule size sieving. In this regard, the two-dimensional sieve barrier can provide very high permeability contrast at a threshold molecular size, allowing high separation ratios based upon size to be realized (e.g., CO2 compared to methane). If the hole-size density in the graphene layer is sufficiently high, the graphene layer can convey very little added resistance to permeation of small molecules. Accordingly, the higher selectivity provided by the graphene layer can allow for a much thinner polymer membrane to be used, compared to solely polymer-containing membranes.


The disclosure provides a composite membrane for separation of a first gas from a second gas; said separation membrane comprising: at least one dense polymeric membrane permeable to said first gas and at least one layer of a perforated two-dimensional material wherein said composite membrane is arranged to provide preferential transport of said first gas relative to said second gas through said at least one dense polymer membrane and said at least one layer of said perforated two-dimensional material. In embodiments, at least one of or each of the dense polymeric membranes is independently characterized by a permeability to said first gas greater or equal to than 1 Barrer (7.5×10−11 cm3 cm−2 s−1 kPa−1), 10 Barrer (7.5×10−10 cm3 cm−2 s−1 kPa−1) or 100 Barrer (7.5×10−9 cm3 cm−2 s−1 kPa−1). In embodiments, at least one of or each of the dense polymeric membranes is independently characterized by a permeability for said first gas is independ from 1 Barrer to 100,000 Barrer, from 10 Barrer to 100,000 Barrer or from 100 Barrer to 100,000 Barrer. In embodiments, the composite membrane is characterized by a net or overall permeability to said first gas greater or equal to than 1 Barrer (7.5×10−11 cm3 cm−2 s−1 kPa−1), 10 Barrer (7.5×10−10 cm3 cm−2 s−1 kPa−1) or 100 Barrer (7.5×10−9 cm3 cm−2 s−1 kPa−1). In embodiments, the net permeability of the composite membrane to said first gas is from 1 Barrer to 100,000 Barrer, from 10 Barrer to 100,000 Barrer or from 100 Barrer to 100,000 Barrer.


The separation selectivity or efficiency of the composite membrane may be taken as the ratio of the net permeability of the composite membrane to the first gas to the net permeability of the composite membrane to the second gas. In embodiments, the net separation selectivity of the composite membrane is greater than 10, greater than 2, greater than 50 or greater than 100.


In an aspect, the disclosure provides a composite membrane comprising at least one dense polymeric membrane and at least one layer of said perforated two-dimensional material, wherein the at least one dense polymeric membrane and at least one layer of said perforated two-dimensional material are provided in physical contact with each other or separated by one or more intermediate structures provided in physical contact with said at least one dense polymeric membrane and said at least one layer of said perforated two-dimensional material. In an embodiment, said at least one dense polymeric membrane and said at least one layer of said perforated two-dimensional material are provided in in a stacked multilayer geometry. In embodiments, said stacked multilayer geometry comprises 1 to 100 layers of dense polymeric membrane and 1 to 100 layers of said perforated two-dimensional material, 1 to 50 layers of said dense polymeric membrane and 1 to 50 layers of said perforated two-dimensional material, 1 to 25 layers of said dense polymeric membrane and 1 to 25 layers of said perforated two-dimensional material, 1 to 10 layers of said dense polymeric membrane and 1 to 10 layers of said perforated two-dimensional material or 1 to 5 layers of dense polymeric membrane and 1 to 5 layers of said perforated two-dimensional material. In an embodiment, said stacked multilayer geometry comprises at least one dense polymeric membrane positioned on an external surface of said composite membrane in physical contact with said first gas and said second gas. In an embodiment, each of said layers of said perforated two-dimensional material provided in said stacked multilayer geometry is independently positioned between first and second adjacent dense polymeric membranes. In an embodiment, said stacked multilayer geometry comprises a first dense polymeric membrane in physical contact with a first layer of said perforated two-dimensional material. In an embodiment, said stacked multilayer geometry further comprises a second dense polymeric membrane wherein said first layer of said perforated two-dimensional material is provided between, and in physical contact with, said first and second dense polymeric membranes. In an embodiment, said stacked multilayer geometry comprises a plurality of said dense polymeric membranes, wherein at least a portion of said dense polymeric membranes have a different chemical compositions, thicknesses or both. In an embodiment, said stacked multilayer geometry comprises a plurality of said layers of said perforated two-dimensional material, wherein at least a portion of said layers of said perforated two-dimensional material have a different chemical compositions, hole cross sectional dimensions, hole densities or any combination of these.


In an embodiment, each of said layers of a perforated two dimensional material independently provides separation of said first and second gases via a molecular sieving process. In an embodiment, each of said layers of perforated two-dimensional material is independently characterized by a ratio of a permeance for said first gas to a permeance for said second gas greater than or equal to 1000. In an embodiment, each of said layers of perforated two-dimensional material is independently characterized by a thickness selected from the range of 0.3 to 5 nm. In an embodiment, each of said layers of perforated two-dimensional material is independently characterized by a tensile strength greater than or equal to 50 MPa. In an embodiment, each of said layers of perforated two-dimensional material is independently characterized by a plurality of holes independently having cross sectional dimensions less than or equal to 15 angstroms, less than or equal to 10 angstroms, or less than or equal to 5 angstroms. In an embodiment, said plurality of holes independently have cross sectional dimensions selected over the range of 3 to 5 angstroms, 3 to 10 angstroms or 3 to 15 angstroms.


In an embodiment each of said layers of perforated two dimensional material independently comprises graphene, a graphene-based material, a transition metal dichalcogenide, molybdenum sulfide, α-boron nitride, silicene, germanene, or a combination thereof. In an embodiment, each of said layers of perforated two-dimensional material independently comprises a perforated graphene-based material. In an embodiment, said perforated graphene-based material comprises single-layer graphene or multi-layer graphene. In an embodiment, the perforated graphene-based material comprises 2 to 20 layers of graphene. In an embodiment, said perforated graphene-based material comprises at least 70% graphene. In an embodiment, said perforated graphene-based has a thickness selected from the range of 0.34 to 5 nm.


In an embodiment, the dense polymeric membrane is selected to provide a higher flux, permeance or permeability for one component of a feedstock mixture over another. In an embodiment, each of said dense polymeric membranes independently provides separation of said first gas and second gas via one or more solution diffusion processes. In an embodiment, each of said dense polymeric membranes is independently characterized by a ratio of the permeability for said first gas to the permeability for said second gas greater than or equal to 10. In an embodiment, each of the dense polymeric membranes is independently characterized by a porosity less than or equal to 1%.


In an embodiment, the dense polymeric membrane contacts the layer of two-dimensional material so that the primary gas transport occurs through the dense polymeric material and layer of two-dimensional material (rather than leakage from the membrane assembly at the interface between the layers). In an embodiment, the dense polymeric membrane is a homogeneous membrane. In embodiments, the thickness of each of the dense polymeric membranes is from less than or equal to 50 μm, from 0.1 μm to 50 μm, from 0.1 μm to 20 μm, 1.0 μm to 15 μm, 0.25 μm to 5 μm, or 5 μm to 10 μm.


Dense polymeric membranes for gas permeation include, but are not limited to, In an embodiment, said each of said dense polymeric membranes independently comprises a fluorocarbon, hydrocarbon, polysilicone, polyimide (PI), cellulose acetate (CA), polysulfone (PSf), polyethersulfone (PES), and polycarbonate (PC) or any combination of these. Polysilicone may also be referred to as silicone rubber. In embodiment, the dense polymeric membrane is selected from the group consisting of polyimide or cellulose acetate. In an embodiment, each of said dense polymeric membranes independently comprises a material selected from the group consisting of Teflon® AF, Sylgard® and any combination of these.


In an embodiment, each of said dense polymeric membranes is capable of exposure to a pressure of 50 psi, 100 psi, 500 psi, 1000 psi or 1500 psi or 2000 psi without undergoing mechanical failure. In an embodiment, each of said dense polymeric membranes is independently characterized by a tensile strength greater than or equal to 20 MPa. In embodiments, each of said dense polymeric membranes is capable of exposure to temperatures up to 300 K, 400 K, 500 K or 600 K without undergoing chemical or physical degradation. In embodiment, each said each of said dense polymeric membranes is independently characterized by a glass transition temperature greater than or equal to 300 K, 400 K, 500 K or 600 K. In an embodiment, each of said dense polymeric membranes is resistant to chemical reaction with H2O, CO2, H2S, a hydrocarbon having from 1 to 9 carbon atoms or any combination of these. The hydrocarbon may be an alkane, an alkene, or an alkyne. In an embodiment, the hydrocarbon has the formula CnH2n+2, CnH2n, or CnH2n−2 where n is an integer from 1 to 9.


In an aspect, the disclosure provides a method for separating a first gas from a second gas; said method comprising the steps of:

    • providing a composite membrane comprising: at least one dense polymeric membrane permeable to said first gas and at least one layer of a perforated two-dimensional material; and
    • contacting an external surface of said composite membrane with said first gas and said second gas; wherein said composite membrane provides preferential transport of said first gas relative to said second gas through said at least one dense polymer membrane and said at least one layer of perforated two-dimensional material, thereby separating said first gas from said second gas


      In embodiments, at least one of or each of the dense polymeric membranes is characterized by a permeability to said first gas greater or equal to than 1 Barrer (7.5×10−11 cm3 cm−2 s−1 kPa−1), 10 Barrer (7.5×10−10 cm3 cm−2 s−1 kPa−1) or 100 Barrer (7.5×cm3 cm2 kPa−1). In embodiments, the permeability of at least one of or each of the dense polymeric membranes to said first gas is from 1 Barrer to 100,000 Barrer, from 10 Barrer to 100,000 Barrer or from 100 Barrer to 100,000 Barrer. In embodiments, the composite membrane is characterized by a net or overall permeability to said first gas greater or equal to than 1 Barrer (7.5×10−11 cm3 cm−2 s−1 kPa−1), 10 Barrer (7.5×10−10 cm3 cm−2 s−1 kPa−1) or 100 Barrer (7.5×10−9 cm3 cm−2 s−1 kPa−1). In embodiments, the net permeability of the composite membrane to said first gas is from 1 Barrer to 100,000 Barrer, from 10 Barrer to 100,000 Barrer or from 100 Barrer to 100,000 Barrer.


In an embodiment, the disclosure provides a method of processing a feedstock gas, an exhaust gas, a revitalization gas or a commercial chemical product. In embodiments, the method is a method of processing a product or a byproduct produced in chemical refining or bioenergy production, a method of N2 purification or CO2 purification, a method of capture or sequestering of CO2 or a method of revitalizing air. In an embodiment, said method is carried out a pressure at said external surface selected over the range of 15 PSI to 2000 PSI. In an embodiment, said method is carried out a temperature at said external surface selected over the range of 200 K to 600 K.


In a further embodiment, a method of processing natural gas by separation of methane from non-methane components is provided. In an embodiment, methane is separated from CO2, H2O, H2S or any combination of these. In an embodiment, methane is said second gas and said first gas is selected from the group consisting of CO2, H2O, H2S or any combination of these. In an embodiment, said processing is carried out at the source of said natural gas. In an embodiment, said natural gas is from a high-CO2 gas field


The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features of the present disclosure in order that the detailed description that follows can be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the disclosure will be described hereinafter. These and other advantages and features will become more apparent from the following description.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions to be taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings describing specific embodiments of the disclosure, wherein:


The FIGURE shows a schematic of an illustrative graphene-based gas separation membrane of the present disclosure and an exemplary method for its fabrication.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A variety of two-dimensional materials useful in the present invention are known in the art. In various embodiments, the two-dimensional material comprises graphene, molybdenum sulfide, or boron nitride. In an embodiment, the two-dimensional material is a graphene-based material. In more particular embodiments, the two-dimensional material is graphene. Graphene according to the embodiments of the present disclosure can include single-layer graphene, multi-layer graphene, or any combination thereof. Other nanomaterials having an extended two-dimensional molecular structure can also constitute the two-dimensional material in the various embodiments of the present disclosure. For example, molybdenum sulfide is a representative chalcogenide having a two-dimensional molecular structure, and other various chalcogenides can constitute the two-dimensional material in the embodiments of the present disclosure. Choice of a suitable two-dimensional material for a particular application can be determined by a number of factors, including the chemical and physical environment into which the graphene or other two-dimensional material is to be terminally deployed.


In an embodiment, the two dimensional material useful in membranes herein is a sheet of graphene-based material. Graphene-based materials include, but are not limited to, single layer graphene, multilayer graphene or interconnected single or multilayer graphene domains and combinations thereof. In an embodiment, graphene-based materials also include materials which have been formed by stacking single or multilayer graphene sheets. In embodiments, multilayer graphene includes 2 to 20 layers, 2 to 10 layers or 2 to 5 layers. In embodiments, graphene is the dominant material in a graphene-based material. For example, a graphene-based material comprises at least 30% graphene, or at least 40% graphene, or at least 50% graphene, or at least 60% graphene, or at least 70% graphene, or at least 80% graphene, or at least 90% graphene, or at least 95% graphene. In embodiments, a graphene-based material comprises a range of graphene selected from 30% to 95%, or from 40% to 80% from 50% to 70%, from 60% to 95% or from 75% to 100%.


As used herein, a “domain” refers to a region of a material where atoms are uniformly ordered into a crystal lattice. A domain is uniform within its boundaries, but different from a neighboring region. For example, a single crystalline material has a single domain of ordered atoms. In an embodiment, at least some of the graphene domains are nanocrystals, having a domain size from 1 to 100 nm or 10-100 nm. In an embodiment, at least some of the graphene domains have a domain size greater than 100 nm to 1 micron, or from 200 nm to 800 nm, or from 300 nm to 500 nm. “Grain boundaries” formed by crystallographic defects at edges of each domain differentiate between neighboring crystal lattices. In some embodiments, a first crystal lattice may be rotated relative to a second crystal lattice, by rotation about an axis perpendicular to the plane of a sheet, such that the two lattices differ in “crystal lattice orientation”.


In an embodiment, the sheet of graphene-based material comprises a sheet of single or multilayer graphene or a combination thereof. In an embodiment, the sheet of graphene-based material is a sheet of single or multilayer graphene or a combination thereof. In another embodiment, the sheet of graphene-based material is a sheet comprising a plurality of interconnected single or multilayer graphene domains. In an embodiment, the interconnected domains are covalently bonded together to form the sheet. When the domains in a sheet differ in crystal lattice orientation, the sheet is polycrystalline.


In embodiments, the thickness of the sheet of graphene-based material is from 0.34 to 10 nm, from 0.34 to 5 nm, or from 0.34 to 3 nm. In an embodiment, a sheet of graphene-based material comprises intrinsic defects. Intrinsic defects are those resulting from preparation of the graphene-based material in contrast to perforations which are selectively introduced into a sheet of graphene-based material or a sheet of graphene. Such intrinsic defects include, but are not limited to, lattice anomalies, pores, tears, cracks or wrinkles. Lattice anomalies can include, but are not limited to, carbon rings with other than 6 members (e.g. 5, 7 or 9 membered rings), vacancies, interstitial defects (including incorporation of non-carbon atoms in the lattice), and grain boundaries.


In an embodiment, membrane comprising the sheet of graphene-based material further comprises non-graphenic carbon-based material located on the surface of the sheet of graphene-based material. In an embodiment, the non-graphenic carbon-based material does not possess long range order and may be classified as amorphous. In embodiments, the non-graphenic carbon-based material further comprises elements other than carbon and/or hydrocarbons. Non-carbon elements which may be incorporated in the non-graphenic carbon include, but are not limited to, hydrogen, oxygen, silicon, copper and iron. In embodiments, the non-graphenic carbon-based material comprises hydrocarbons. In embodiments, carbon is the dominant material in non-graphenic carbon-based material. For example, a non-graphenic carbon-based material comprises at least 30% carbon, or at least 40% carbon, or at least 50% carbon, or at least 60% carbon, or at least 70% carbon, or at least 80% carbon, or at least 90% carbon, or at least 95% carbon. In embodiments, a non-graphenic carbon-based material comprises a range of carbon selected from 30% to 95%, or from 40% to 80%, or from 50% to 70%.


Two-dimensional materials in which pores are intentionally created are referred to herein as “perforated”, such as “perforated graphene-based materials”, “perforated two-dimensional materials’ or “perforated graphene.” Two-dimensional materials are, most generally, those which have atomically thin thickness from single-layer sub-nanometer thickness to a few nanometers and which generally have a high surface area. Two-dimensional materials include metal chalogenides (e.g., transition metal dichalogenides), transition metal oxides, hexagonal boron nitride, graphene, silicone and germanene (see: Xu et al. (2013) “Graphene-like Two-Dimensional Materials) Chemical Reviews 113:3766-3798).


Two-dimensional materials include graphene, a graphene-based material, a transition metal dichalcogenide, molybdenum sulfide, α-boron nitride, silicene, germanene, or a combination thereof. Other nanomaterials having an extended two-dimensional, planar molecular structure can also constitute the two-dimensional material in the various embodiments of the present disclosure. For example, molybdenum sulfide is a representative chalcogenide having a two-dimensional molecular structure, and other various chalcogenides can constitute the two-dimensional material in embodiments of the present disclosure. In another example, two-dimensional boron nitride can constitute the two-dimensional material in an embodiment of the invention. Choice of a suitable two-dimensional material for a particular application can be determined by a number of factors, including the chemical and physical environment into which the graphene, graphene-based or other two-dimensional material is to be deployed.


The technique used for forming the two-dimensional material, graphene or graphene-based material in the embodiments described herein is not believed to be particularly limited. For example, in some embodiments CVD graphene or graphene-based material can be used. In various embodiments, the CVD graphene or graphene-based material can be liberated from its growth substrate (e.g., Cu) and transferred to a polymer backing. Likewise, the techniques for introducing perforations to the graphene or graphene-based material are also not believed to be particularly limited, other than being chosen to produce perforations within a desired size range. Perforations are sized to provide desired selective permeability of a species (atom or molecule) for a given gas separation application. Selective permeability relates to the propensity of a porous material or a perforated two-dimensional material to allow passage (or transport) of one or more species more readily or faster than other species. Selective permeability allows separation of species which exhibit different passage or transport rates. In two-dimensional materials selective permeability correlates to the dimension or size (e.g., diameter) of apertures and the relative effective size of the species. Selective permeability of the perforations in two-dimensional materials such as graphene-based materials can also depend on functionalization of perforations (if any) and the specific species that are to be separated. Selective permeability of gases can also depend upon adsorption of a gas species on the filtration material, e.g., graphene. Adsorption at least in part can increase the local concentration of the gas species at the surface of the filtration material enhancing the rate of passage through the apertures. Separation of two or more species in a mixture includes a change in the ratio(s) (weight or molar ratio) of the two or more species in the mixture after passage of the mixture through a perforated two-dimensional material.


For example in applications for separation of gases, permeance is correlated with the size of a gas atom or molecule, for example as in kinetic diameters [see Marreucci et al. (2006) “Transport of gases and Vapors in Glass and Rubbery Polymers” in Materials Science of Membranes for Gas and Vapor Separation. (Eds. Yu et al.) John Wiley & Sons (New York).


The present disclosure is also directed, in part, to perforated graphene, perforated graphene-based materials and other perforated two-dimensional materials containing a plurality of apertures (or holes) ranging from about 3 to 15 angstroms in size. In a further embodiment, the hole size ranges from 3 to 10 angstroms or from 3 to 6 angstroms in size. The present disclosure is further directed, in part, to perforated graphene, perforated graphene-based materials and other perforated two-dimensional materials containing a plurality of holes ranging from about 3 to 15 angstrom in size and having a narrow size distribution, including but not limited to a 1-10% deviation in size or a 1-20% deviation in size. In an embodiment, the characteristic dimension of the holes is from about 3 to 15 angstroms in size. For circular holes, the characteristic dimension is the diameter of the hole. In embodiments relevant to non-circular pores, the characteristic dimension can be taken as the largest distance spanning the hole, the smallest distance spanning the hole, the average of the largest and smallest distance spanning the hole, or an equivalent diameter based on the in-plane area of the pore. As used herein, perforated graphene-based materials include materials in which non-carbon atoms have been incorporated at the edges of the pores.


The present disclosure is directed, in part, to methods for conducting gas separation using perforated graphene or another two dimensional material. The present disclosure is also directed, in part, to separation membranes formed from graphene or another two dimensional material. The present disclosure is also directed, in part, to methods for fabricating a separation membrane containing graphene or another two dimensional material.


Graphene has garnered widespread interest for use in a number of applications due to its favorable mechanical, thermal and electronic properties. Graphene represents an atomically thin layer of carbon in which the carbon atoms reside as closely spaced atoms at regular lattice positions. The regular lattice positions can have a plurality of defects present therein, which can occur natively or be intentionally introduced to the graphene basal plane. Such defects will also be equivalently referred to herein as “apertures,” “perforations,” or “holes.” The term “perforated graphene” will be used herein to denote a graphene sheet with defects in its basal plane, regardless of whether the defects are natively present or intentionally produced. Aside from such apertures, graphene and other two-dimensional materials can represent an impermeable layer to many substances. Therefore, if they can be sized properly, the apertures in the impermeable layer can be useful for only allowing substances meeting certain size criteria through the impermeable layer.


In an embodiment, a dense polymeric membrane is substantially nonporous. In an embodiment, gas transport through a nonporous membrane occurs at least in part through a solution-diffusion mechanism. The present inventors recognized that the performance of polymer membranes could be improved by inserting a molecular sieve barrier into the polymer, specifically a molecular sieve barrier formed from graphene or a like two-dimensional material. In particular, the inventors recognized that perforated graphene could be used in a gas separation membrane to provide improved gas separation properties. Perforated graphene can be produced by any suitable technique, such as disclosed in commonly owned United States Patent Application Publication 2012/0048804, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In this regard, the extreme thinness of graphene reflects that molecular transport across the membrane can involve the least possible driving energy, and there are not believed to be distinct “dissolution” and “evaporation” steps involved during transport across its atomic lattice.


The use of graphene in gas separation processes can allow very selective separation processes to take place with various gases. For example, use of graphene in separating a mixture of CO2 and methane can result in a selectivity ratio of about 10,000:1. By carefully choosing the perforation size within the graphene basal plane, graphene can allow complex gas mixtures to be separated that are not able to be efficiently handled using existing processes.


In addition to the foregoing benefits, permeation rates across the graphene can be “tuned” via specialized chemical functionalization of the graphene, such as along its edges, thereby providing an additional means of designing membranes for specific separation applications. Moreover, because the membranes described herein represent a layered structure with atomically thin layers of graphene embedded therein, the mass and footprint of the present membranes are not significantly different than existing polymeric membranes, while still achieving improved gas separation performance.


Further to the above, graphene-containing gas separation membranes can further offer reduced pressure sensitivity requirements, improved chemical inertness, and the opportunity to functionalize the surface of the graphene. Functionalization, in particular, can be used to tailor the graphene's performance during various separation operations.


In various embodiments, the gas separation membranes described herein can include one or more layers of a polymer and one or more layers of perforated graphene. Polymers suitable for use in the gas separation membranes can include those that are used in conventional gas separation membranes. The perforated graphene can be produced by any technique, known or presently unknown, used for introducing a plurality of holes in graphene. Suitable techniques can include plasma treatment, ion or other particle beams, chemical modifications, and the like. The holes in the graphene can be sized such that they render the graphene impermeable to gases that are larger than the hole size. In various embodiments, the perforations can range between about 0.2 nm to about 15 nm in size, from 3 to 15 angstroms in size, from 3 to 10 angstroms in size or from 3 to 6 angstroms in size.


Benefits that can be conveyed by the polymer in the gas separation membranes can include support of the graphene and conveyance of some gas separation properties in their own right. In illustrative embodiments, the polymer can include a fluorocarbon polymer, such as polytetrafluoroethylene, or a silicone polymer. In addition, the polymer can provide good tensile strength and good tensile elongation properties. Moreover, some polymers can be flexible as thin layers and exhibit high glass transition temperatures. All of these properties can be complementary to the graphene and its properties and support its combination therewith in forming a gas separation membrane.


Benefits that can be conveyed by the graphene in the gas separation membranes can include extreme molecular separation capabilities at high permeability. The extreme thinness of graphene (e.g., 0.3-3 nm) can enhance these features. Moreover, graphene exhibits high tensile strength (˜106 GPa), excellent chemical stability, and thermal stability above 400° C. Again, the graphene properties can well complement those of the polymer in forming a gas separation membrane.


Several parameters are known in the art to characterize transport through membranes. As used herein, the flux (Ji) refers to the number of moles, volume or mass of a specified component i passing per unit time through a unit of membrane surface area normal to the thickness direction (SI Units: m3 m−2 s−1). As used herein, the permeance or pressure normalized flux refers to the transport flux per unit transmembrane driving force (SI Units: m3 m−2 s−1 kPa−1. As used herein, the permeability refers to the transport flux per unit transmembrane driving force per unit membrane thickness (Pi=Ji/transmembrane driving force of component i SI Units: m3 m m−2 s−1 kPa−1). Other units for permeability include the Barrer, defined as 1 Barrer=10−10 cm3 cm cm−2 s−1 cmHg−1, which is equal to 7.5×10−11 cm3 cm cm−2 s−1 kPa−1. Techniques for measuring these parameters for conventional membranes are known to those skilled in the art.


The FIGURE shows a schematic of an illustrative graphene-based gas separation membrane of the present disclosure and an exemplary method for its fabrication. As shown, the graphene layer (10) is made on a layer of copper (50). A polymer layer (20) is then spun on the graphene layer (10) and annealed. A stamp (60) is applied to the polymer layer before the copper is removed through etching. The graphene layer is perforated and then transferred to a substrate (80). The stamp is then removed, producing the polymer and graphene layered upon one another on a substrate. Although the FIGURE shows perforation of the graphene with Xe ions, other perforation processes can be used. Moreover, the graphene can be perforated before or after being layered with the polymer.


Referring still to The FIGURE, a simple molding process can be used to embed large areas of graphene into polymer matrices, such as an exemplary siloxane (PDMS) rubber matrix. The rubber matrix can mechanically support and protect the graphene, while the graphene layer lends new separation capabilities to the composite membrane, as described above. Substantially impermeable membranes are also possible by embedding un-perforated graphene layers in a polymer stack.


The bulk polymer membrane can operate normally by solution-diffusion processes, giving some separation of gas species. The embedded graphene sieve filter (i.e., perforated graphene layers) can block or inhibit diffusion of molecules larger than the holes in the graphene, while at the same time permitting diffusion of smaller molecules. Thus, the composite membrane can separate gas species by two complementary mechanisms: solution-diffusion at the polymer (i.e., molecule-polymer interaction) and molecule size sieving. In this regard, the two-dimensional sieve barrier can provide very high permeability contrast at a threshold molecular size, allowing high separation ratios based upon size to be realized (e.g., CO2 compared to methane). If the hole-size density in the graphene layer is sufficiently high, the graphene layer can convey very little added resistance to permeation of small molecules. Accordingly, the higher selectivity provided by the graphene layer can allow for a much thinner polymer membrane to be used, compared to solely polymer-containing membranes.


Due to the complementary solution-diffusion separation provided by the polymer, enhanced separation capabilities can be further realized. For example, when separating H2S from methane, H2S separation can take place in a silicone-rubber polymer (silicone-rubber has high affinity for separating H2S) even if the graphene layer doesn't separate these species efficiently. With a proper selection of polymer type, polymer thickness, graphene hole size, graphene hole density, and graphene hole functionalization, composite membranes of this type can be designed that are capable of high selectivity across a wide range of molecular types while preserving or even enhancing overall separation efficiency (in terms of flux of separating species passing therethrough).


A membrane that can simultaneously handle both high CO2 and H2S gas concentrations would extend the range of applications for membrane separations in natural gas processing. If such a membrane could simultaneously remove these gases from natural gas in a single process step, it would eliminate the need for separate cleaning processes for these contaminants, thereby reducing overall process costs and complexity. In this regard, various gas separation membranes described herein can be used in separating natural gas from various contaminant gases therein. The methods can include contacting as-produced or partially purified natural gas with the described separation membranes. Other gas mixtures can be purified in a like manner by appropriately sizing the holes in the graphene layer.


Other new functionalities are also possible by the foregoing composite membrane approach. For example, graphene is electrically conductive and can be built into a multi-layer composite stack with graphene layers separated by dielectric layers and electrically connected to a voltage source to enable capacitive charging between layers. Such an arrangement can be used to electrophoretically or dielectrophoretically control the movement of charged or polar particles between charged graphene electrode layers. If the graphene layers are perforated, the motion of molecules entering thorough graphene pores can be controlled between graphene layers by application of an appropriate voltage waveform to the graphene layers. Thus, molecular transport between graphene layers can be controllably retarded or enhanced in accordance with these embodiments. Such an arrangement can effectively represent a switchable membrane “gate” through which transport can be reduced or enhanced at will. Other versions are also possible for the case of uncharged or non-polar particles or very small particles (molecules). For example, electrical heating of embedded graphene layers can be used to force interlayer material phase changes (for example from a glassy state to liquid or back), thereby providing further control options over molecular transport between layers.


In addition to the foregoing uses in gas separation described hereinabove, it is to be recognized that the membranes described herein can also be used in a variety of other applications. Illustrative processes can include, for example, reverse osmosis filters, integrated circuits, flat panel displays, electrodes, flexible solar cells, desalination, and other molecular filtration processes, both in the gas and liquid phases.


Although the disclosure has been described with reference to the disclosed embodiments, one having ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that these are only illustrative of the disclosure. It should be understood that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the disclosure. The disclosure can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Additionally, while various embodiments of the disclosure have been described, it is to be understood that aspects of the disclosure may include only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, the disclosure is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description.


Every formulation or combination of components described or exemplified can be used to practice the invention, unless otherwise stated. Specific names of compounds are intended to be exemplary, as it is known that one of ordinary skill in the art can name the same compounds differently. When a compound is described herein such that a particular isomer or enantiomer of the compound is not specified, for example, in a formula or in a chemical name, that description is intended to include each isomers and enantiomer of the compound described individual or in any combination. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that methods, device elements, starting materials and synthetic methods other than those specifically exemplified can be employed in the practice of the invention without resort to undue experimentation. All art-known functional equivalents, of any such methods, device elements, starting materials and synthetic methods are intended to be included in this invention. Whenever a range is given in the specification, for example, a temperature range, a time range, or a composition range, all intermediate ranges and subranges, as well as all individual values included in the ranges given are intended to be included in the disclosure. When a Markush group or other grouping is used herein, all individual members of the group and all combinations and subcombinations possible of the group are intended to be individually included in the disclosure.


As used herein, “comprising” is synonymous with “including,” “containing,” or “characterized by,” and is inclusive or open-ended and does not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps. As used herein, “consisting of” excludes any element, step, or ingredient not specified in the claim element. As used herein, “consisting essentially of” does not exclude materials or steps that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristics of the claim. Any recitation herein of the term “comprising”, particularly in a description of components of a composition or in a description of elements of a device, is understood to encompass those compositions and methods consisting essentially of and consisting of the recited components or elements. The invention illustratively described herein suitably may be practiced in the absence of any element or elements, limitation or limitations which is not specifically disclosed herein.


The terms and expressions which have been employed are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, but it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention claimed. Thus, it should be understood that although the present invention has been specifically disclosed by preferred embodiments and optional features, modification and variation of the concepts herein disclosed may be resorted to by those skilled in the art, and that such modifications and variations are considered to be within the scope of this invention as defined by the appended claims.


In general the terms and phrases used herein have their art-recognized meaning, which can be found by reference to standard texts, journal references and contexts known to those skilled in the art. The preceding definitions are provided to clarify their specific use in the context of the invention.


All references throughout this application, for example patent documents including issued or granted patents or equivalents; patent application publications; and non-patent literature documents or other source material; are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties, as though individually incorporated by reference, to the extent each reference is at least partially not inconsistent with the disclosure in this application (for example, a reference that is partially inconsistent is incorporated by reference except for the partially inconsistent portion of the reference).


All patents and publications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the levels of skill of those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains. References cited herein are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety to indicate the state of the art, in some cases as of their filing date, and it is intended that this information can be employed herein, if needed, to exclude (for example, to disclaim) specific embodiments that are in the prior art. For example, when a compound is claimed, it should be understood that compounds known in the prior art, including certain compounds disclosed in the references disclosed herein (particularly in referenced patent documents), are not intended to be included in the claim.

Claims
  • 1. A composite membrane for separation of a first gas from a second gas; said separation membrane comprising: at least one dense polymeric membrane characterized by a permeability for said first gas greater than or equal to 7.5×10−11 cm3 cm−2 s−1 kPa−1;at least one layer of a perforated two-dimensional material; anda plurality of dielectric layers electrically connected to a voltage source,wherein the plurality of dielectric layers are arranged to charge the at least one layer of the perforated two-dimensional material to control the movement of particles contained within the first gas and particles contained within the second gas through the at least one layer of the perforated two-dimensional material,wherein said composite membrane is arranged to provide preferential transport of said first gas relative to said second gas through said at least one dense polymer membrane and said at least one layer of said perforated two-dimensional material,wherein the at least one dense polymeric membrane is configured to provide preferential transport of the first gas relative to the second gas by solution-diffusion, andwherein the at least one layer of the perforated two-dimensional material is configured to provide preferential transport of the first gas relative to the second gas by molecular separation.
  • 2. The composite membrane of claim 1, wherein a net gas separation selectivity for said first gas relative to said second gas is greater than or equal to 100.
  • 3. The composite membrane of claim 1, wherein each of said dense polymeric membranes independently has a thickness less than or equal to 50 microns.
  • 4. The composite membrane of claim 1, wherein each of said dense polymeric membranes independently comprises a fluorocarbon, hydrocarbon, polysilicone, polyimide, cellulose acetate, polysulfone, polyethersulfone, and polycarbonate or any combination of these.
  • 5. The composite membrane of claim 1, wherein each of said layers of perforated two-dimensional material is independently characterized by a thickness selected from the range of 0.3 to 5 nm.
  • 6. The composite membrane of claim 1, wherein each of said layers of perforated two-dimensional material is independently characterized by a plurality of holes independently having cross sectional dimensions less than or equal to 10 angstroms.
  • 7. The composite membrane of claim 6, wherein said plurality of holes independently have cross sectional dimensions selected over the range of 3 to 5 angstroms.
  • 8. The composite membrane of claim 1, wherein each of said layers of perforated two-dimensional material independently comprises graphene, a graphene-based material, a transition metal dichalcogenide, molybdenum sulfide, α-boron nitride, silicone, germanene, or a combination thereof.
  • 9. The composite membrane of claim 1, wherein each of said layers of perforated two-dimensional material independently comprises a perforated graphene-based material.
  • 10. The composite membrane of claim 9, wherein said perforated graphene-based material comprises single-layer graphene or multi-layer graphene.
  • 11. The composite membrane of claim 1, wherein the at least one dense polymeric membrane and the at least one layer of said perforated two-dimensional material are provided in physical contact with each other or separated by one or more intermediate structures provided in physical contact with said at least one dense polymeric membrane and said at least one layer of said perforated two-dimensional material.
  • 12. The composite membrane of claim 1, wherein said at least one dense polymeric membrane and said at least one layer of said perforated two-dimensional material are provided in a stacked multilayer geometry.
  • 13. The composite membrane of claim 12, wherein said stacked multilayer geometry comprises a first dense polymeric membrane in physical contact with a first layer of said perforated two-dimensional material.
  • 14. The composite membrane of claim 13, wherein said stacked multilayer geometry further comprises a second dense polymeric membrane wherein said first layer of said perforated two-dimensional material is provided between, and in physical contact with, said first and second dense polymeric membranes.
  • 15. A method for separating a first gas from a second gas; said method comprising the steps of: providing a composite membrane comprising: at least one dense polymeric membrane characterized by a permeability for said first gas greater than or equal to 7.5×10−11 cm3 cm−2 s−1 kPa−1;at least one layer of a perforated two-dimensional material; anda plurality of dielectric layers electrically connected to a voltage source; andcontacting an external surface of said composite membrane with said first gas and said second gas;wherein the plurality of dielectric layers are arranged to charge the at least one layer of the perforated two-dimensional material to control the movement of particles contained within the first gas and particles contained within the second gas through the at least one layer of the perforated two-dimensional material,wherein said composite membrane provides preferential transport of said first gas relative to said second gas through said at least one dense polymer membrane and said at least one layer of perforated two-dimensional material, thereby separating said first gas from said second gas,wherein the at least one dense polymeric membrane is configured to provide preferential transport of the first gas relative to the second gas by solution-diffusion, andwherein the at least one layer of the perforated two-dimensional material is configured to provide preferential transport of the first gas relative to the second gas by molecular separation.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein methane is said second gas and said first gas is selected from the group consisting of CO2, H2O, H2S or any combination of these.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, wherein said method is carried out at a temperature at said external surface selected over the range of 200 K to 600 K.
  • 18. The composite membrane of claim 1, wherein the at least one layer of the perforated two-dimensional material is chemically functionalized.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 of U.S. Provisional Application 61/951,930, filed Mar. 12, 2014, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (587)
Number Name Date Kind
2187417 Doble Jan 1940 A
3024153 Kennedy Mar 1962 A
3303085 Price et al. Feb 1967 A
3501831 Gordon Mar 1970 A
3593854 Swank Jul 1971 A
3701433 Krakauer et al. Oct 1972 A
3802972 Fleischer et al. Apr 1974 A
4073732 Lauer et al. Feb 1978 A
4159954 Gangemi Jul 1979 A
4162220 Servas Jul 1979 A
4277344 Cadotte Jul 1981 A
4303530 Shah et al. Dec 1981 A
4743371 Servas et al. May 1988 A
4855058 Holland et al. Aug 1989 A
4880440 Perrin Nov 1989 A
4889626 Browne Dec 1989 A
4891134 Vcelka Jan 1990 A
4925560 Sorrick May 1990 A
4935207 Stanbro et al. Jun 1990 A
4976858 Kadoya Dec 1990 A
5052444 Messerly et al. Oct 1991 A
5080770 Culkin Jan 1992 A
5156628 Kranz Oct 1992 A
5182111 Aebischer et al. Jan 1993 A
5185086 Kaali et al. Feb 1993 A
5201767 Caldarise et al. Apr 1993 A
5244981 Seidner et al. Sep 1993 A
5314492 Hamilton et al. May 1994 A
5314960 Spinelli et al. May 1994 A
5314961 Anton et al. May 1994 A
5331067 Seidner et al. Jul 1994 A
5344454 Clarke et al. Sep 1994 A
5371147 Spinelli et al. Dec 1994 A
5425858 Farmer Jun 1995 A
5480449 Hamilton et al. Jan 1996 A
5514181 Light et al. May 1996 A
5516522 Peyman et al. May 1996 A
5549697 Caldarise Aug 1996 A
5562944 Kafrawy Oct 1996 A
5565210 Rosenthal et al. Oct 1996 A
5580530 Kowatsch et al. Dec 1996 A
5595621 Light et al. Jan 1997 A
5636437 Kaschmitter et al. Jun 1997 A
5639275 Baetge et al. Jun 1997 A
5641323 Caldarise Jun 1997 A
5658334 Caldarise et al. Aug 1997 A
5662158 Caldarise Sep 1997 A
5665118 LaSalle et al. Sep 1997 A
5671897 Ogg et al. Sep 1997 A
5679232 Fedor et al. Oct 1997 A
5679249 Fendya et al. Oct 1997 A
5687788 Caldarise et al. Nov 1997 A
5700477 Rosenthal et al. Dec 1997 A
5713410 LaSalle et al. Feb 1998 A
5716412 DeCarlo et al. Feb 1998 A
5716414 Caldarise Feb 1998 A
5725586 Sommerich Mar 1998 A
5731360 Pekala et al. Mar 1998 A
5733503 Kowatsch et al. Mar 1998 A
5746272 Mastrorio et al. May 1998 A
5782286 Sommerich Jul 1998 A
5782289 Mastrorio et al. Jul 1998 A
5788916 Caldarise Aug 1998 A
5800828 Dionne et al. Sep 1998 A
5808312 Fukuda Sep 1998 A
5868727 Barr et al. Feb 1999 A
5897592 Caldarise et al. Apr 1999 A
5902762 Mercuri et al. May 1999 A
5906234 Mastrorio et al. May 1999 A
5910172 Penenberg Jun 1999 A
5910173 DeCarlo et al. Jun 1999 A
5913998 Butler et al. Jun 1999 A
5925247 Huebbel Jul 1999 A
5932185 Pekala et al. Aug 1999 A
5935084 Southworth Aug 1999 A
5935172 Ochoa et al. Aug 1999 A
5954937 Farmer Sep 1999 A
5974973 Tittgemeyer Nov 1999 A
5976555 Liu et al. Nov 1999 A
5980718 Van Konynenburg et al. Nov 1999 A
6008431 Caldarise et al. Dec 1999 A
6013080 Khalili Jan 2000 A
6022509 Matthews et al. Feb 2000 A
6052608 Young et al. Apr 2000 A
6080393 Liu et al. Jun 2000 A
6093209 Sanders Jul 2000 A
6139585 Li Oct 2000 A
6152882 Prutchi Nov 2000 A
6156323 Verdicchio et al. Dec 2000 A
6193956 Liu et al. Feb 2001 B1
6209621 Treacy Apr 2001 B1
6213124 Butterworth Apr 2001 B1
6228123 Dezzani May 2001 B1
6264699 Noiles et al. Jul 2001 B1
6292704 Malonek et al. Sep 2001 B1
6309532 Tran et al. Oct 2001 B1
6346187 Tran et al. Feb 2002 B1
6375014 Garcera et al. Apr 2002 B1
6426214 Butler et al. Jul 2002 B1
6454095 Brisebois et al. Sep 2002 B1
6455115 Demeyer Sep 2002 B1
6461622 Liu et al. Oct 2002 B2
6462935 Shiue et al. Oct 2002 B1
6521865 Jones et al. Feb 2003 B1
6532386 Sun et al. Mar 2003 B2
6580598 Shiue et al. Jun 2003 B2
6654229 Yanagisawa et al. Nov 2003 B2
6659298 Wong Dec 2003 B2
6660150 Conlan et al. Dec 2003 B2
6661643 Shiue et al. Dec 2003 B2
6692627 Russell et al. Feb 2004 B1
6695880 Roffman et al. Feb 2004 B1
6699684 Ho et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719740 Burnett et al. Apr 2004 B2
6905612 Dorian et al. Jun 2005 B2
6924190 Dennison Aug 2005 B2
7014829 Yanagisawa et al. Mar 2006 B2
7071406 Smalley et al. Jul 2006 B2
7092753 Darvish et al. Aug 2006 B2
7138042 Tran et al. Nov 2006 B2
7171263 Darvish et al. Jan 2007 B2
7175783 Curran Feb 2007 B2
7179419 Lin et al. Feb 2007 B2
7190997 Darvish et al. Mar 2007 B1
7267753 Anex et al. Sep 2007 B2
7306768 Chiga Dec 2007 B2
7357255 Ginsberg et al. Apr 2008 B2
7374677 McLaughlin et al. May 2008 B2
7381707 Lin et al. Jun 2008 B2
7382601 Yoshimitsu Jun 2008 B2
7434692 Ginsberg et al. Oct 2008 B2
7452547 Lambino et al. Nov 2008 B2
7459121 Liang et al. Dec 2008 B2
7460907 Darvish et al. Dec 2008 B1
7476222 Sun et al. Jan 2009 B2
7477939 Sun et al. Jan 2009 B2
7477940 Sun et al. Jan 2009 B2
7477941 Sun et al. Jan 2009 B2
7479133 Sun et al. Jan 2009 B2
7505250 Cho et al. Mar 2009 B2
7531094 McLaughlin et al. May 2009 B2
7600567 Christopher et al. Oct 2009 B2
7631764 Ginsberg et al. Dec 2009 B2
7650805 Nauseda et al. Jan 2010 B2
7674477 Schmid et al. Mar 2010 B1
7706128 Bourcier Apr 2010 B2
7761809 Bukovec et al. Jul 2010 B2
7786086 Reches et al. Aug 2010 B2
7866475 Doskoczynski et al. Jan 2011 B2
7875293 Shults et al. Jan 2011 B2
7935331 Lin May 2011 B2
7935416 Yang et al. May 2011 B2
7943167 Kulkarni et al. May 2011 B2
7960708 Wolfe et al. Jun 2011 B2
7998246 Liu et al. Aug 2011 B2
8109893 Lande Feb 2012 B2
8147599 McAlister Apr 2012 B2
8262943 Meng et al. Sep 2012 B2
8308702 Batchvarova et al. Nov 2012 B2
8316865 Ochs et al. Nov 2012 B2
8329476 Pitkanen et al. Dec 2012 B2
8354296 Dimitrakopoulos et al. Jan 2013 B2
8361321 Stetson et al. Jan 2013 B2
8449504 Carter et al. May 2013 B2
8475689 Sun et al. Jul 2013 B2
8506807 Lee et al. Aug 2013 B2
8512669 Hauck Aug 2013 B2
8513324 Scales et al. Aug 2013 B2
8535726 Dai et al. Sep 2013 B2
8592291 Shi et al. Nov 2013 B2
8617411 Singh Dec 2013 B2
8666471 Rogers et al. Mar 2014 B2
8686249 Whitaker et al. Apr 2014 B1
8697230 Ago et al. Apr 2014 B2
8698481 Lieber et al. Apr 2014 B2
8715329 Robinson et al. May 2014 B2
8721074 Pugh et al. May 2014 B2
8734421 Sun et al. May 2014 B2
8744567 Fassih et al. Jun 2014 B2
8751015 Frewin et al. Jun 2014 B2
8753468 Caldwell et al. Jun 2014 B2
8759153 Elian et al. Jun 2014 B2
8808257 Pugh et al. Aug 2014 B2
8828211 Garaj et al. Sep 2014 B2
8840552 Brauker et al. Sep 2014 B2
8857983 Pugh et al. Oct 2014 B2
8861821 Osumi Oct 2014 B2
8894201 Pugh et al. Nov 2014 B2
8940552 Pugh et al. Jan 2015 B2
8950862 Pugh et al. Feb 2015 B2
8974055 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 B2
8975121 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 B2
8979978 Miller et al. Mar 2015 B2
8986932 Turner et al. Mar 2015 B2
8993234 Turner et al. Mar 2015 B2
8993327 McKnight et al. Mar 2015 B2
9014639 Pugh et al. Apr 2015 B2
9017937 Turner et al. Apr 2015 B1
9023220 Graphenea May 2015 B2
9028663 Stetson, Jr. et al. May 2015 B2
9035282 Dimitrakopoulos et al. May 2015 B2
9045847 Batchvarova et al. Jun 2015 B2
9050452 Sun et al. Jun 2015 B2
9052533 Pugh et al. Jun 2015 B2
9056282 Miller et al. Jun 2015 B2
9062180 Scales et al. Jun 2015 B2
9067811 Bennett et al. Jun 2015 B1
9070615 Elian et al. Jun 2015 B2
9075009 Kim et al. Jul 2015 B2
9080267 Batchvarova et al. Jul 2015 B2
9095823 Fleming Aug 2015 B2
9096050 Bedell et al. Aug 2015 B2
9096437 Tour et al. Aug 2015 B2
9102111 Pugh et al. Aug 2015 B2
9108158 Yu et al. Aug 2015 B2
9110310 Pugh et al. Aug 2015 B2
9125715 Pugh et al. Sep 2015 B2
9134546 Pugh et al. Sep 2015 B2
9169575 Bedworth et al. Oct 2015 B1
9170646 Toner et al. Oct 2015 B2
9185486 Pugh Nov 2015 B2
9193587 Bennett Nov 2015 B2
9195075 Pugh et al. Nov 2015 B2
9225375 Pugh et al. Dec 2015 B2
9242865 Sinton et al. Jan 2016 B2
9388048 Zhou et al. Jul 2016 B1
9425709 Hayashi et al. Aug 2016 B2
9463421 Fleming Oct 2016 B2
9475709 Stetson et al. Oct 2016 B2
9480952 Sinton et al. Nov 2016 B2
9505192 Stoltenberg et al. Nov 2016 B2
9567224 Bedworth Feb 2017 B2
9572918 Bachmann et al. Feb 2017 B2
9592475 Stoltenberg et al. Mar 2017 B2
9610546 Sinton et al. Apr 2017 B2
20010036556 Jen Nov 2001 A1
20010047157 Burnett et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010055597 Liu et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020079004 Sato et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020079054 Nakatani Jun 2002 A1
20020104435 Baker et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020115957 Sun et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020183682 Darvish et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020183686 Darvish et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030052354 Dennison Mar 2003 A1
20030134281 Evans Jul 2003 A1
20030138777 Evans Jul 2003 A1
20030146221 Lauer et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030159985 Siwy et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040061253 Kleinmeyer et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040063097 Evans Apr 2004 A1
20040099324 Fraser et al. May 2004 A1
20040111968 Day et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040112865 McCullough et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121488 Chang et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040142463 Walker et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040185730 Lambino et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193043 Duchon et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199243 Yodfat Oct 2004 A1
20040217036 Ginsberg et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040241214 Kirkwood et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040251136 Lean et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004508 Sun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050004509 Sun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050004550 Sun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050010161 Sun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050010192 Sun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050015042 Sun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050053563 Manissier et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050112078 Boddupalli et al. May 2005 A1
20050126966 Tanida et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050129633 Lin Jun 2005 A1
20050148996 Sun et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050170089 Lashmore et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050189673 Klug et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050226834 Lambino et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050238730 Le Fur et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060005381 Nishi et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060036332 Jennings Feb 2006 A1
20060073370 Krusic et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060093885 Krusic et al. May 2006 A1
20060121279 Petrik Jun 2006 A1
20060151382 Petrik Jul 2006 A1
20060166347 Faulstich et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060180604 Ginsberg et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060222701 Kulkarni et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060253078 Wu et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070004640 Lin et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070032054 Ramaswamy et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070056894 Connors, Jr. Mar 2007 A1
20070060862 Sun et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070062856 Pahl et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070099813 Luizzi et al. May 2007 A1
20070131646 Donnelly et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070284279 Doskoczynski et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080017564 Hammond Jan 2008 A1
20080035484 Wu et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080035541 Franzreb et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045877 Levin et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080061477 Capizzo Mar 2008 A1
20080063585 Smalley et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080081323 Keeley et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080081362 Keeley et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080149561 Chu et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080156648 Dudziak et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080170982 Zhang et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080185293 Klose et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080188836 Weber et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080190508 Booth et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080241085 Lin et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080268016 Fang et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080290020 Marand et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080290111 Ginsberg et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090023572 Backes et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090039019 Raman Feb 2009 A1
20090048685 Frigstad et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090075371 Keeley et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090087395 Lin et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090117335 Iyoda et al. May 2009 A1
20090148495 Hammer et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090176159 Zhamu et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090222072 Robinson et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090236295 Braun et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090241242 Beatty et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090283475 Hylton et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090291270 Zettl et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090294300 Kanzius et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090306364 Beer et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100000754 Mann et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100016778 Chattopadhyay Jan 2010 A1
20100021708 Kong et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100024722 Ochs et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100024838 Ochs et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025330 Ratto et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100055464 Sung Mar 2010 A1
20100059378 Elson et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100072643 Pugh et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076553 Pugh et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100105834 Tour et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100110372 Pugh et al. May 2010 A1
20100124564 Martinson et al. May 2010 A1
20100127312 Grebel et al. May 2010 A1
20100161014 Lynch et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100167551 Dedontney Jul 2010 A1
20100196439 Beck et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100209515 Chantalat et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100213079 Willis Aug 2010 A1
20100224555 Hoek et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100228204 Beatty et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100233781 Bangera et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100249273 Scales et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100258111 Shah et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100323177 Ruoff et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100327847 Leiber et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110014217 Fahmy et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110037033 Green et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110041519 McAlister Feb 2011 A1
20110041687 Diaz Feb 2011 A1
20110045523 Strano et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110054418 Pugh et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110054576 Robinson et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110056892 Lancaster Mar 2011 A1
20110073563 Chang et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110092054 Seo et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110092949 Wang Apr 2011 A1
20110100921 Heinrich May 2011 A1
20110112484 Carter et al. May 2011 A1
20110118655 Fassih et al. May 2011 A1
20110120970 Joo et al. May 2011 A1
20110124253 Shah et al. May 2011 A1
20110139707 Siwy et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110152795 Aledo et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110201201 Arnold et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110202201 Matsubara Aug 2011 A1
20110253630 Bakajin et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110258791 Batchvarova et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110258796 Batchvarova et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110262645 Batchvarova et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110263912 Miller et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110269920 Min et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120031833 Ho et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120048804 Stetson et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120116228 Okubo May 2012 A1
20120145548 Sivan et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120148633 Sun et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120162600 Pugh et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120183738 Zettl et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120186850 Sugiyama et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120211367 Vecitis Aug 2012 A1
20120218508 Pugh et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120220053 Lee et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120234453 Pugh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120234679 Garaj et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120235277 Pugh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120236254 Pugh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120236524 Pugh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120241371 Revanur et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120242953 Pugh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120255899 Choi Oct 2012 A1
20120267337 Striemer et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120292245 Saito Nov 2012 A1
20120298396 Hong et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120301707 Kinloch et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130015136 Bennett Jan 2013 A1
20130034760 Otts et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130045523 Leach et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130056367 Martinez et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130071941 Miller Mar 2013 A1
20130096292 Brahmasandra et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130100436 Jackson et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130105417 Stetson et al. May 2013 A1
20130108839 Arnold et al. May 2013 A1
20130116541 Gracias et al. May 2013 A1
20130131214 Scales et al. May 2013 A1
20130135578 Pugh et al. May 2013 A1
20130146221 Kolmakov et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130146480 Garaj et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130152386 Pandojirao-S et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130174978 Pugh et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130190476 Lancaster et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130192460 Miller Aug 2013 A1
20130192461 Miller et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130194540 Pugh et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130213568 Pugh et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130215377 Pugh et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130215378 Pugh et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130215380 Pugh et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130216581 Fahmy et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130240355 Ho et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130240437 Rodrigues et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130248097 Ploss, Jr. Sep 2013 A1
20130248367 Stetson et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130249147 Bedworth Sep 2013 A1
20130256118 Meller et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130256139 Peng Oct 2013 A1
20130256154 Peng Oct 2013 A1
20130256210 Fleming Oct 2013 A1
20130256211 Fleming Oct 2013 A1
20130261568 Martinson et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130269819 Ruby et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130270188 Karnik Oct 2013 A1
20130273288 Luo et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130277305 Stetson et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130295150 Chantalat et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130309776 Drndic et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130317131 Scales et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130317132 Scales et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130317133 Scales et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130323295 Scales et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130338611 Pugh et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130338744 Frewin et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140002788 Otts et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140005514 Pugh et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140015160 Kung et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140017322 Dai et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140048411 Choi et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140066958 Priewe Mar 2014 A1
20140079936 Russo et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140093728 Shah et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140128891 Astani-Matthies et al. May 2014 A1
20140141521 Peng et al. May 2014 A1
20140151288 Miller et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140151631 Duesberg et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140154464 Miller et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140170195 Fassih et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140171541 Scales et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140174927 Bashir et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140190004 Riall et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140190550 Loh et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140190676 Zhamu et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140190833 Lieber et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140192313 Riall et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140192314 Riall et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140199777 Ruiz et al. Jul 2014 A2
20140209539 El Badawi et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140212596 Jahangiri-Famenini Jul 2014 A1
20140230653 Yu et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140230733 Miller Aug 2014 A1
20140231351 Wickramasinghe et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140248621 Collins Sep 2014 A1
20140257348 Priewe et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140257517 Deichmann et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140259657 Riall et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140261999 Stetson et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140263035 Stoltenberg et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140263178 Sinton et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140264977 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140268015 Riall et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140268020 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140268021 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140268026 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140272286 Stoltenberg et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140272522 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140273315 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140273316 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140276481 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140276999 Harms et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140306361 Pugh et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140308681 Strano et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140315213 Nagrath et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140318373 Wood et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140322518 Addleman Oct 2014 A1
20140333892 Pugh et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140335661 Pugh et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140343580 Priewe Nov 2014 A1
20140346081 Sowden et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140349892 Van Der Zaag et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140350372 Pugh et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140377651 Kwon et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140377738 Bachmann et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150015843 Pugh et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150017918 Pugh et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150057762 Harms et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150061990 Toner et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150062533 Toner et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150063605 Pugh Mar 2015 A1
20150066063 Priewe Mar 2015 A1
20150075667 McHugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077658 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077659 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077660 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077661 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077662 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077663 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077699 De Sio et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077702 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A9
20150079683 Yager et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150087249 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150096935 Mitra et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150098910 Mordas et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150101931 Garaj et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150105686 Vasan Apr 2015 A1
20150118318 Fahmy et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150122727 Karnik et al. May 2015 A1
20150138454 Pugh et al. May 2015 A1
20150142107 Pugh et al. May 2015 A1
20150145155 Pugh et al. May 2015 A1
20150146162 Pugh et al. May 2015 A1
20150147474 Batchvarova et al. May 2015 A1
20150170788 Miller et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150174253 Sun et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150174254 Sun et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150182473 Bosnyak et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150185180 Ruhl et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150196579 Ferrante et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150202351 Kaplan et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150212339 Pugh et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150217219 Sinsabaugh et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150218210 Stetson et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150221474 Bedworth Aug 2015 A1
20150231557 Miller et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150231577 Nair et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150247178 Mountcastle et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150258254 Simon et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150258498 Simon et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150258502 Turowski Sep 2015 A1
20150258503 Sinton et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150258525 Westman et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150268150 Newkirk et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150272834 Sun et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150272896 Sun et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150273401 Miller Oct 2015 A1
20150309337 Flitsch et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150321147 Fleming et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150321149 McGinnis Nov 2015 A1
20150323811 Flitsch et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150336202 Bedworth et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150342900 Putnins Dec 2015 A1
20150346382 Bliven et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150351887 Peters Dec 2015 A1
20150359742 Fassih et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150378176 Flitsch et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160009049 Stoltenberg et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160038885 Hogen-Esch et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160043384 Zhamu et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160058932 Stetson et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160059190 Yoo et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160067390 Simon et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160074814 Park Mar 2016 A1
20160074815 Sinton et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160272499 Graphenea Sep 2016 A1
20160282326 Waduge et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160284811 Yu et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160339160 Bedworth et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170032962 Graphenea Feb 2017 A1
20170037356 Simon et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170057812 Graphenea Mar 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (101)
Number Date Country
2037988 Sep 1992 CA
2411935 Dec 2002 CA
1128501 Aug 1996 CN
101108194 Jan 2008 CN
101243544 Aug 2008 CN
101428198 May 2009 CN
101489653 Jul 2009 CN
101996853 Mar 2011 CN
102242062 Nov 2011 CN
102344132 Feb 2012 CN
102423272 Apr 2012 CN
102592720 Jul 2012 CN
101996853 Aug 2012 CN
102637584 Aug 2012 CN
103153441 Jun 2013 CN
103182249 Jul 2013 CN
103603706 Feb 2014 CN
19536560 Mar 1997 DE
10 2005 049 388 Apr 2007 DE
0 364 628 Apr 1990 EP
1 034 251 Jan 2004 EP
1 777 250 Apr 2007 EP
1 872 812 Jan 2008 EP
2 060 286 May 2009 EP
2 107 120 Oct 2009 EP
2 230 511 Sep 2010 EP
1 603 609 May 2011 EP
2 354 272 Aug 2011 EP
2 450 096 May 2012 EP
2 489 520 Aug 2012 EP
2 511 002 Oct 2012 EP
2 586 473 May 2013 EP
2 679 540 Jan 2014 EP
2 937 313 Oct 2015 EP
3 070 053 Sep 2016 EP
3 084 398 Oct 2016 EP
1 538 2430.5 Mar 2017 EP
3 135 631 Mar 2017 EP
59-102111 Jul 1984 JP
10-510471 May 1995 JP
7504120 May 1995 JP
2001-232158 Aug 2001 JP
2004-179014 Jun 2004 JP
2005-126966 May 2005 JP
2006-188393 Jul 2006 JP
2011-168448 Sep 2011 JP
2011-241479 Dec 2011 JP
2004-202480 Jul 2014 JP
2015-503405 Feb 2015 JP
2016-175828 Oct 2016 JP
1020110084110 Jul 2011 KR
1020120022164 Mar 2012 KR
10-2012-0022164 Jan 2014 KR
1020140002570 Jan 2014 KR
WO-9333901 Mar 1993 WO
WO-9312859 Aug 1993 WO
WO-9500231 Jan 1995 WO
WO-9712664 Apr 1997 WO
WO-9830501 Jul 1998 WO
WO-0070012 Nov 2000 WO
WO-02055539 Jul 2002 WO
WO-2013115762 Aug 2003 WO
WO-2004009840 Jan 2004 WO
WO-2004082733 Sep 2004 WO
WO-2005047857 May 2005 WO
WO-2007103411 Sep 2007 WO
WO-2007140252 Dec 2007 WO
WO-2008008533 Jan 2008 WO
WO-2009129984 Oct 2009 WO
WO-2010006080 Jan 2010 WO
WO-2010115904 Oct 2010 WO
WO-2011019686 Feb 2011 WO
WO-2011046706 Apr 2011 WO
WO-2011001674 Jun 2011 WO
WO-2011063458 Jun 2011 WO
WO-2011075158 Jun 2011 WO
WO-2011094204 Aug 2011 WO
WO-2011100458 Aug 2011 WO
WO-2011138689 Nov 2011 WO
WO-2012006657 Jan 2012 WO
WO-2012021801 Feb 2012 WO
WO-2012027148 Mar 2012 WO
WO-2012028695 Mar 2012 WO
WO-2012030368 Mar 2012 WO
WO-2012125770 Sep 2012 WO
WO-2012138671 Oct 2012 WO
WO-2012142852 Oct 2012 WO
WO-2013016445 Jan 2013 WO
WO-2013048063 Apr 2013 WO
WO-2013138137 Sep 2013 WO
WO-2013138698 Sep 2013 WO
WO-2013151799 Oct 2013 WO
WO-2013152179 Oct 2013 WO
WO-2014084861 Jun 2014 WO
WO-2014168629 Oct 2014 WO
WO-2015030698 Mar 2015 WO
WO-2015138736 Sep 2015 WO
WO-2015138752 Sep 2015 WO
WO-2015138771 Sep 2015 WO
WO-2015197217 Dec 2015 WO
WO-2016102003 Jun 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (421)
Entry
CN Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201380013988.9 mailed Aug. 18, 2016 (English translation not readily available).
Cohen-Tanugi, “Nanoporous graphene as a water desalination membrane,” (Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (Jun. 2015).
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,770 mailed Aug. 12, 2016.
US Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,190 mailed Aug. 29, 2016.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,580 dated Jun. 2, 2016.
US Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,273 mailed Jul. 6, 2016.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,198 dated Jun. 3, 2016.
Yoon, “Simulations show how to turn graphene's defects into assets,” ScienceDaily (Oct. 4, 2016), www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/10/161004120428.htm.
Zhang et al. Modern Thin-Film Technology 284-285 (Metallurgical Industry Press, 1st ed. 2009) (English translation not readily available).
Adiga et al., “Nanoporous Materials for Biomedical Devices,” JOM 60: 26-32 (Mar. 25, 2008).
Allen et al., “Craters on silicon surfaces created by gas cluster ion impacts,” Journal of Applied Physics, 92(7): 3671-8 (Oct. 2002).
AMI Applied Membranes Inc. (undated). FilmTec Nanofiltration Membrane Elements. Retrieved Jun. 1, 2016, from http://www.appliedmembranes.com/filmtec-nanofiltration-membrane-elements.html.
Apel, “Track etching technique in membrane technology,” Radiation Measurements 34(1-6): 559-566 (Jun. 2001).
Atmeh et al., “Albumin Aggregates: Hydrodynamic Shape and Physico-Chemical Properties,” Jordan Journal of Chemistry, 2(2): 169-182 (2007).
Bae et al., “Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes,” Nature Nanotechnology 5: 574-578 (Jun. 20, 2010).
Bai et al., “Graphene nanomesh,” Nature Nanotechnology 5: 190-194 (Feb. 14, 2010).
Baker. (2004). “Track-etch Membranes.” In Membrane Technology and Applications (2nd ed., pp. 92-94). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
Butler et al. “Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities in Two-Dimensional Materials Beyond Graphene”, Materials Review 7(4): 2898-2926 (Mar. 6, 2013).
Chen et al., “Mechanically Strong, Electrically Conductive, and Biocompatible Graphene Paper,” Adv. Mater., 20(18): 3557-3561 (Sep. 2008) (available online Jul. 2008).
Chhowalla et al., “The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets,” Nature Chemistry 5: 263-275 (Mar. 20, 2013).
Childres et al., “Effect of oxygen plasma etching on graphene studied using Raman spectroscopy and electronic transport measurements,” New Journal of Physics 13 (Feb. 10, 2011).
Clochard. (undated). Radiografted track-etched polymer membranes for research and application [Scholarly project]. In Laboratoire Des Solides Irradiés. Retrieved Jun. 2, 2016, from http://iramis.cea.fr/radiolyse/5juin2015/Clochard.pdf.
Cohen-Tanugi et al, “Water Desalination across Nanoporous Graphene,” ACS Nano Letters 12(7): 3602-3608 (Jun. 5, 2012).
Colton, “Implantable biohybrid artificial organs,” Cell Transplantation 4(4): 415-436 (Jul.-Aug. 1995).
Desai et al., “Nanoporous microsystems for islet cell replacement,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 56: 1661-1673 (Jul. 23, 2004).
Dong et al., “Growth of large-sized graphene thin-films by liquid precursor-based chemical vapor deposition under atmospheric pressure,” Carbon 49(11): 3672-3678 (May 2011).
Fischbein et al., “Electron beam nanosculpting of suspended graphene sheets,” Applied Physics Letters 93(113107): 1-3, (Sep. 16, 2008).
Fissell et al., “High-Performance Silicon Nanopore Hemofiltration Membranes,” NIH-PA Author Manuscript, PMC, (Jan. 5, 2010), also published in J. Memb. Sci. 326(1): 58-63 (Jan. 5, 2009).
Fuertes et al., “Carbon composite membranes from Matrimid® and Kapton® polyimides for gas separation,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 33: 115-125 (Dec. 1999).
Galashev, “Computer study of the removal of Cu from the graphene surface using Ar clusters,” Computational Materials Science, 98:123-128 (Feb. 2015) (available online Nov. 2014).
Gimi et al., “A Nanoporous, Transparent Microcontainer for Encapsulated Islet Therapy,” J. Diabetes Sci. Tech. 3(2): 1-7 (Mar. 2009).
Hong et al., “Graphene multilayers as gates for multi-week sequential release of proteins from surfaces,” NIH-PA Author Manuscript PMC (Jun. 1, 2014), also published in ACS Nano, Jan. 24, 2012; 6(1): 81-88 (first published online Dec. 29, 2011).
Hu et al., “Enabling graphene oxide nanosheets as water separation membranes,” Environmental Science & Technology 47(8): 3715-3723 (Mar. 14, 2013).
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/013599 mailed Jul. 20, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/013805 mailed Apr. 30, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/018114 mailed Jun. 3, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/020246 mailed Jun. 10, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/020296 mailed Jun. 17, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/028948 mailed Jul. 16, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/029932 mailed Oct. 6, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027607 mailed Jul. 22, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027616 mailed Jul. 22, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027596 mailed Jul. 22, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027603 mailed Jul. 22, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027610 mailed Jul. 22, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027612 mailed Jul. 22, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027637 mailed Jun. 22, 2016.
International Search Report in PCT/US15/20201 mailed Jun. 10, 2015.
International Search Report in PCT/US2015/048205 mailed Dec. 4, 2015.
Inui et al., “Molecular dynamics simulations of nanopore processing in a graphene sheet by using gas cluster ion beam,” Appl. Phys. A, 98: 787-794 (Mar. 2010) (available online Dec. 2009).
Jiang et al., “Porous Graphene as the Ultimate Membrane for Gas Separation,” Nano Letters 9(12): 4019-4024 (Sep. 23, 2009).
Joshi et al., “Precise and ultrafast molecular sieving through graphene oxide membranes”, Science 343(6172): 752-754 (Feb. 14, 2014).
Kanani et al., “Permeability—Selectivity Analysis for Ultrafiltration: Effect of Pore Geometry,” NIH-PA Author Manuscript, PMC, (Mar. 1, 2011), also published in J. Memb. Sci. 349(1-2): 405 (Mar. 1, 2010).
Karan et al., “Ultrafast Viscous Permeation of Organic Solvents Through Diamond-Like Carbon Nanosheets,” Science 335: 444-447 (Jan. 27, 2012).
Kim et al., “Fabrication and Characterization of Large Area, Semiconducting Nanoperforated Graphene Materials,” Nano Letters 10(4): 1125-1131 (Mar. 1, 2010).
Kim et al., “The structural and electrical evolution of graphene by oxygen plasma-induced disorder,” Nanotechnology IOP 20(375703): 1-8 (Aug. 26, 2009).
Koh et al., “Sensitive NMR Sensors Detect Antibodies to Influenza,” NIH PA Author Manuscript PMC (Apr. 2009), also published in Angew. Chem. Int'l. Ed. Engl, 47(22): 4119-4121 (May 2008) (available online Apr. 2008).
Koski and Cui, “The New Skinny in Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials”, ACS Nano 7(5): 3739-3743 (May 16, 2013).
Kurapati et al., “Graphene oxide based multilayer capsules with unique permeability properties: facile encapsulation of multiple drugs,” Chemical Communication 48: 6013-6015 (Apr. 25, 2012).
Lehtinen et al., “Cutting and controlled modification of graphene with ion beams,” Nanotechnology, 22: 175306 (8 pages) (Mar. 2011).
Li et al., “3D graphene oxide-polymer hydrogel: near-infrared light-triggered active scaffold for reversible cell capture and on-demand release,” Advanced Materials 25: 6737-6743 (Oct. 7, 2013).
Liu et al., “Atomically Thin Molybdenum Disulfide Nanopores with High Sensitivity for DNA Translocation,” ACS Nano 8(3): 2504-2511 (Feb. 18, 2014).
Liu et al., “Graphene Oxidation: Thickness-Dependent Etching and Strong Chemical Doping,” Nano Letters 8(7): 1965-1970 (Jun. 19, 2008).
Marquardt et al., “Hybrid materials of platinum nanoparticles and thiol-functionalized graphene derivatives,” Carbon 66: 285-294 (Jan. 2014; first published online Sep. 12, 2013).
Matteucci et al., “Chapter 1: Transport of gases and Vapors in Glass and Rubbery Polymers,” in Materials Science of Membranes for Gas and Vapor Separation (Yampolskii et al eds. 2006) (available online Jun. 2006).
Mishra et al., “Functionalized Graphene Sheets for Arsenic Removal and Desalination of Sea Water,” Desalination 282: 39-45 (Nov. 1, 2011).
Morse, “Scalable Synthesis of Semiconducting Nanopatterned Graphene Materials,” InterNano Resources for Nanomanufacturing (undated). Retrieved Jun. 2, 2016 from: http://www.internano.org/node/345.
Nair et al., “Unimpeded Permeation of Water Through Helium-Leak-tight Graphene-Based Membranes,” Science 335: 442-444 (Jan. 27, 2012).
Nam et al., “Monodispersed PtCo nanoparticles on hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide treated graphene as an effective oxygen reduction reaction catalyst for proton exchange membrane fuel cells,” Carbon 50: 3739-3747 (Aug. 2012) (available online Apr. 2012).
Nandamuri et al., “Chemical vapor deposition of graphene films,” Nanotechnology 21(14): 1-4 (Mar. 10, 2010).
Nayini et al., “Synthesis and characterization of functionalized carbon nanotubes with different wetting behaviors and their influence on the wetting properties of carbon nanotubes/polymethylmethacrylate coatings,” Progress in Organic Coatings, 77(6): 1007-1014 (Jun. 2014) (available online Mar. 2014).
O'Hern et al. “Selective Molecular Transport through Intrinsic Defects in a Single Layer of CVD Graphene,” ACS Nano, 6(11): 10130-10138 (Oct. 2, 2012).
O'Hern et al., “Selective Ionic Transport through Tunable Subnanometer Pores in Single-Layer Graphene Membranes,” Nano Letters 14(3): 1234-1241 (Feb. 3, 2014).
O'Hern, “Development of process to transfer large areas of LPCVD graphene from copper foil to a porous support substrate,” 1-62 (M.S. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (Sep. 2011).
Paul, “Creating New Types of Carbon-Based Membranes,” Science 335: 413-414 (Jan. 27, 2012).
Plant et al., “Size-dependent propagation of Au nanoclusters through few-layer graphene,” Nanoscale, 6: 1258-1263 (2014) (available online Oct. 2013).
Popok. “Cluster Ion Implantation in Graphite and Diamond: Radiation Damage and Stopping of Cluster Constituents,” Reviews on Advanced Materials Science 38(1): 7-16 (2014).
Russo et al., “Atom-by-atom nucleation and growth of graphene nanopores,” PNAS, 109(16): 5953-5957 (Apr. 2012).
Schweicher et al., “Membranes to achieve immunoprotection of transplanted islets,” NIH-PA Author Manuscript, PMC, (Nov. 13, 2014), also published in Frontiers in Bioscience (Landmark Ed) 19: 49-76 (Jan. 1, 2014).
Sint et al., “Selective Ion Passage through Functionalized Graphene Nanopores,” JACS 130: 16448-16449 (Nov. 14, 2008).
Suk et al., “Water Transport Through Ultrathin Graphene,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 1(10): 1590-1594 (Apr. 30, 2010).
Sun et al., “Growth of graphene from solid carbon sources,” Nature 468(7323): 549-552 (Nov. 25, 2010; including corrigendum in Nature 471(7336): 124 (Mar. 2011).
Tan et al., “Beta-cell regeneration and differentiation: how close are we to the ‘holy grail’?” J. Mol. Encodrinol. 53(3): R119-R129 (Dec. 1, 2014).
Tang et al., “Highly wrinkled cross-linked graphene oxide membranes for biological and charge-storage applications,” Small 8(3): 423-431 (Feb. 6, 2012; first published online Dec. 13, 2011).
Vlassiouk et al., “Versatile ultrathin nanoporous silicon nitride membranes,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(50): 21039-21044 (Dec. 15, 2009).
Wadvalla, “Boosting agriculture through seawater,” Nature Middle East (Jul. 2, 2012). Retrieved Jun. 1, 2016 from: natureasia.com/en/nmiddleeast/article/10.1038/nmiddleeast.2012.92?WT.mc—id=FBK NatureMEast].
Wikipedia, “Ion track.” Jun. 1, 2016. Retrieved Jun. 1, 2016 from: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ion—track.
Xu et al., “Graphene-like Two-Dimensional Materials”, Chemical Reviews 113: 3766-3798 (Jan. 3, 2013).
Zabihi et al., “Formation of nanopore in a suspended graphene sheet with argon cluster bombardment: A molecular dynamics simulation study,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 343: 48-51 (Jan. 2015) (available online Nov. 2014).
Zan et al., “Graphene Reknits Its Holes,” Nano Lett. 12(8): 3936-3940 (Jul. 5, 2012).
Zhao et al. “Two-Dimensional Material Membranes: An Emerging Platform for Controllable Mass Transport Applications,” Small 10(22): 4521-4542 (Sep. 10, 2014).
Zhao et al., “Drilling Nanopores in Graphene with Clusters: A Molecular Dynamics Study,” J. Phys. Chem. C, 116(21): 11776-1178 (2012) (available online May 2012).
Zhao et al., “Effect of Si02 substrate on the irradiation-assisted manipulation of supported graphene: a molecular dynamics study,” Nanotechnology, 23(28):1-8 (Jul. 2012) (available online Jun. 2012).
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,273 dated Oct. 28, 2016.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007 dated Oct. 21, 2016.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007 dated Dec. 21, 2015.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007 dated Jul. 1, 2016.
Barreiro et al. “Understanding the catalyst-free transformation of amorphous carbon into graphene by current-induced annealing,” Scientific Reports, 3 (Article 1115): 1-6 (Jan. 2013).
Botari et al., “Graphene healing mechanisms: A theoretical investigation,” Carbon, 99: 302-309 (Apr. 2016) (published online Dec. 2015).
Chen et al., “Defect Scattering in Graphene,” Physical Review Letters, 102: 236805-1-236805-4 (Jun. 2009).
Chen et al., “Self-healing of defected graphene,” Applied Physics Letters, 102(10): 103107-1-103107-5 (Mar. 2013).
Cheng et al., “Ion Transport in Complex Layered Graphene-Based Membranes with Tuneable Interlayer Spacing,” Science Advances, 2(2): e1501272 (9 pages) (Feb. 2016).
Crock et al., “Polymer Nanocomposites with Graphene-Based Hierarchical Fillers as Materials for Multifunctional Water Treatment Membranes,” Water Research, 47(12): 3984-3996 (Aug. 2013) (published online Mar. 2013).
Han et al., “Ultrathin Graphene Nanofiltration Membrane for Water Purification,” Advanced Functional Materials, 23(29): 3693-3700 (Aug. 2013).
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027583 mailed Jan. 13, 2017.
Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027590 mailed Jan. 6, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027594 mailed Jan. 13, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027628 mailed Jan. 9, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027631 mailed Jan. 13, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027632 mailed Jan. 9, 2017.
Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/052010 mailed Dec. 20, 2016.
International Search Report in PCT/US2016/027629 mailed Dec. 8, 2016.
International Search Report in PCT/US2016/052007 mailed Dec. 27, 2016.
Kjeldsen, T., “Yeast secretory expression of insulin precursors,” Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 54: 277-286 (May 2000).
Lin et al., “A Direct and Polymer-Free Method for Transferring Graphene Grown by Chemical Vapor Deposition to Any Substrate,” ACSNANO, 8(2): 1784-1791 (Jan. 2014).
Liu et al. “Synthesis of high-quality monolayer and bilayer graphene on copper using chemical vapor deposition,” Carbon, 49(13): 4122-4130 (Nov. 2011) (published online May 2011).
O'Hern et al., “Nanofiltration across defect-sealed nanoporous monolayer graphene,” Nano Letters, 15(5): 3254-3260 (Apr. 2015).
US Corrected Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/480,569 mailed May 26, 2015.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,770 dated Apr. 25, 2016.
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,273 mailed Dec. 14, 2016.
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/480,569 mailed Feb. 27, 2015.
US Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/480,569 mailed Jul. 30, 2014.
US Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,471 mailed Dec. 1, 2016.
US Restriction Requirement in U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007 mailed Jul. 17, 2015.
Wang et al., “Graphene Oxide Membranes with Tunable Permeability due to Embedded Carbon Dots,” Chemical Communications, 50(86): 13089-13092 (Nov. 2014) (published online Sep. 2014).
Xu et al., “Graphene Oxide-TiO2 Composite Filtration Membranes and their Potential Application for Water Purification,” Carbon, 62: 465-471 (Oct. 2013) (published online Jun. 2013).
Zhao et al., “A glucose-responsive controlled release of insulin system based on enzyme multilayers-coated mesoporous silica particles,” Chem. Commun., 47: 9459-9461 (Jun. 2011).
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,770 mailed Jan. 23, 2017.
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,198 mailed Feb. 10, 2017.
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,198 mailed Mar. 1, 2017.
US Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,325 mailed Feb. 16, 2017.
US Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007 mailed Mar. 23, 2017.
US Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/843,944 mailed Jan. 6, 2017.
US Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,464 mailed Mar. 10, 2017.
US Corrected Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,273 mailed Apr. 12, 2017.
AE Search and Examination Report for United Arab Emirates Application No. P186/13 dated Oct. 4, 2016.
Agenor et al., “Renal tubular dysfunction in human visceral leishmaniasis (Kala-azar),” Clinical Nephrology 71(5): 492-500 (May 2009) (available online Mar. 21, 2011).
Albert et al., “Ringer's lactate is compatible with the rapid infusion of AS-3 preserved packed red blood cells,” Can. J. Anaesth. 56(5): 352-356 (May 2009) (available online Apr. 2, 2009).
Aluru et al. “Modeling electronics on the nanoscale.” Handbook of nanoscience, engineering and technology Goddard W, Brenner D, Lyshevski S, lafrate GJ (2002): 11-1.
Alvarenga, “Carbon nanotube materials for aerospace wiring” Rochester Institute of Technology, 2010.
AMI Applied Membranes Inc., “Filmtec Nanofiltration Membrane Elements”, Retrieved from appliedmembranes.com/nanofiltration—elements.htm, accessed Apr. 28, 2015 (2 Pages).
ASO et al., “Comparison of serum high-molecular weight (HMW) adiponectin with total adiponectin concentrations in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery using a novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect HMW adiponectin,” Diabetes 55(7): 1954-1960 (Jul. 2006).
AU Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2013235234, dated Jan. 13, 2017, 4 pages.
AU Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2013363283, dated Jun. 20, 2017, 4 pages.
AU Notice of Acceptance for Australian Application No. 2011293742 dated Jan. 13, 2016.
Axelsson et al., “Acute hyperglycemia induces rapid, reversible increases in glomerular permeability in nondiabetic rats,” AM. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 298(6): F1306-F1312 (Jun. 2010) (available online Mar. 17, 2010).
Bains et al., “Novel lectins from rhizomes of two Acorus species with mitogenic activity and inhibitory potential towards murine cancer cell lines,” Intl Immunopharmacol. 5(9): 1470-1478 (Aug. 2005) (available online May 12, 2005).
Baker, “Membrane Technology and Applications”, Membrane Technology and Applications; Apr. 14, 2004; pp. 92-94.
Barreiro et al. “Transport properties of graphene in the high-current limit.” Physical review letters 103.7 (2009): 076601.
Bazargani et al. “Low molecular weight heparin improves peritoneal ultrafiltration and blocks complement and coagulation,” Peritoneal Dialysis Int'l 25(4): 394-404 (Jul. 2005-Aug. 2005).
Bazargani, “Acute inflammation in peritoneal dialysis: experimental studies in rats. Characterization of regulatory mechanisms,” Swedish Dental J. Supp. 171: 1-57, i (2005).
Beppu et al., “Antidiabetic effects of dietary administration of Aloe arborescens Miller components on multiple low-dose streptozotocin-induced diabetes in mice: investigation on hypoglycemic action and systemic absorption dynamics of aloe components,” J. Ethnopharmacol. 103(3): 468-77 (Feb. 20, 2006) (available online Jan. 6, 2006).
Bieri et al. “Two-dimensional Polymer Formation on Surfaces: Insight into the Roles of Precursor Mobility and Reactivity” JACS, 2010, vol. 132, pp. 16669-16676.
Bruin et al., “Maturation and function of human embryonic stem cell-derived pancreatic progenitors in macroencapsulation devices following transplant into mice”, Diabetologia (2013), vol. 56: 1987-1998 (Jun. 16, 2013).
Chu Ju, et al. “Modern Biotechnology” East China University of Technology Press, (Sep. 2007), vol. 1; pp. 306-307, ISBN 978-7-5628-2116-8.
Clochard, “Track-Etched Polymer Membranes,” Laboratory of Irradiated Solids, Ecole Polytechnique, retrieved from http://www.lsi.polytechnique.fr/home/research/physics-and-chemistry-of-nano-objects/trac . . ., Accessed Jul. 30, 2015 (2 pages).
CN Notification of Grant for Chinese Application No. 201180049184.5 dated Jun. 6, 2016.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380014845.X dated Jul. 8, 2016.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380014845.X dated Sep. 2, 2015.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380019165.5 dated Aug. 25, 2015.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380073141.X dated Jun. 8, 2016.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380073141.X dated Mar. 21, 2017.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201480015372.X dated Aug. 2, 2016.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 20118004918.5 dated Jun. 15, 2015.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201180049184.5 dated Jul. 30, 2014.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201180049184.5 dated Mar. 4, 2016.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380014845.X dated Dec. 23, 2016.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380017644.5 dated Feb. 7, 2017.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380017644.5 dated May 26, 2016.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380017644.5 dated Sep. 29, 2015.
CN Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201380013988.9 dated Oct. 27, 2015.
Daniel et al. “Implantable Diagnostic Device for Cancer Monitoring.” Biosens Bioelectricon. 24(11): 3252-3257 (Jul. 15, 2009).
Database WPI, Week 201238, Thomson Scientific, London, GB; AN 2012-D49442. No date.
De Lannoy et al., “Aquatic Biofouling Prevention by Electrically Charged Nanocomposite Polymer Thin Film Membranes”, 2013 American Water Work Association membrane Technology Conference; Environmental science & technology 47.6 (2013): 2760-2768.
Deng et al., “Renal protection in chronic kidney disease: hypoxia-inducible factor activation vs. angiotensin II blockade,” Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 299(6): F1365-F1373 (Dec. 2010) (available online Sep. 29, 2010).
Edwards, “Large Sheets of Graphene Film Produced for Transparent Electrodes (w/ Video)”; (Jun. 21, 2010), PhysOrg.com, retrieved on May 15, 2017 from https://phys.org/news/2010-06-large-sheets-graphene-transparentelectrodes.html (2 pages).
EP Office Action for European Application No. 13715529.7 dated Jun. 24, 2016.
Fayerman, “Canadian scientists use stem cells to reverse diabetes in mice”, The Telegraph-Journal (New Brunswick), 1-2 (Jun. 29, 2012).
Fayerman, “Diabetes reversed in mice; University of B.C. scientists use embryonic stem cells to deal with Type 1 disease”, The Vancouver Sun (British Columbia), 1-2 (Jun. 28, 2012).
Fejes et al. “A review of the properties and CVD synthesis of coiled carbon nanotubes.” Materials 3.4 (2010): 2618-2642.
Franzen, C. “MIT Setting Up Industrial-Scale Graphene Printing Press” Sep. 23, 2011, retrieved from http://talkingpointsmemo.com/idealab/mit-setting-up-industrial-scale-graphene-printing-press (2 pages).
Freedman et al., “Genetic basis of nondiabetic end-stage renal disease,” Semin. Nephrol. 30(2): 101-110 (Mar. 2010).
Garcia-Lopez et al., “Determination of high and low molecular weight molecules of icodextrin in plasma and dialysate, using gel filtration chromatography, in peritoneal dialysis patients,” Peritoneal Dialysis Int'l 25(2): 181-191 (Mar. 2005-Apr. 2005).
Georgakilas et al., “Functionalization of Graphene: Covalent and Non-Covalent Approaches, Derivatives and Applications,” Chem. Rev., (2012) 112(11), pp. 6156-6214.
Gnudi “Molecular mechanisms of proteinuria in diabetes,” Biochem. Soc. Trans. 36(5): 946-949 (Oct. 2008).
Gotloib et al., “Peritoneal dialysis in refractory end-stage congestive heart failure: a challenge facing a no-win situation,” Nephrol. Dialysis. Transplant. 20(Supp. 7): vii32-vii36 (Jul. 2005).
Harvey “Carbon as conductor: a pragmatic view.” Proceedings of the 61st IWCS Conference, http://www.iwcs.org/archives/56333-iwcs-2012b-1.1584632. vol. 1. 2012.
Hashimoto et al. “Direct evidence for atomic defects in graphene layers.” Nature 430.7002 (2004): 870-873.
He, et al. “The attachment of Fe3 O4 nanoparticles to graphene oxide by covalent bonding.” Carbon 48.11 (2010): 3139-3144.
Hone et al. “Graphene has record-breaking strength” Physicsworld.com, Jul. 17, 2008.
Huang et al., “Gene expression profile in circulating mononuclear cells afterexposure to ultrafine carbon particles,” Inhalation Toxicol. 22(10): 835-846 (Aug. 2010).
Humplik, et al. “Nanostructured materials for water desalination.” Nanotechnology 22.29 (2011): 292001.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 5, 2012 for related International Application No. PCT/US11/47800.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 5, 2017 from related PCT application PCT/US2017/024147.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 12, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/074942.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/047800 dated Jan. 5, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/023027 dated Jun. 26, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2013/030344 dated Jun. 19, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2013/033035 dated Jun. 28, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2013/033400, dated Jun. 28, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2013/033403 dated Jun. 28, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2014/041766, dated Sep. 30, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2014 in International Application No. PCT/US2014/021677.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 6, 2014 in International Application No. PCT/US2014/023043.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 16, 2014, for International Application No. PCT/US2014/051011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 19, 2015, in International Application No. PCT/US2015/020287.
Inui et al. “Molecular dynamics simulations of nanopore processing in a graphene sheet by using gas cluster ion beam.” Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing 98.4 (2010): 787-794.
Israelachvili, “Intermolecular and Surface Forces,” 3rd ed., Chap.7.1, Sizes of Atoms, Molecules, and Ions, 2011, 1 page.
Jiao et al., “Castration differentially alters basal and leucine-stimulated tissue protein synthesis in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue,” Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 297(5): E1222-1232 (Nov. 2009) (available online Sep. 15, 2009).
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-501729 dated Dec. 9, 2016 (English translation).
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-501729 dated Jun. 20, 2017 (English translation).
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-501867 dated Oct. 11, 2016 (English translation).
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-503405 dated Nov. 14, 2016 (English translation).
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-503406 dated Dec. 6, 2016(English translation).
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-549508 dated Jun. 27, 2017 (English translation).
Kang et al., “Effect of eplerenone, enalapril and their combination treatment on diabetic nephropathy in type 11 diabetic rats,” Nephrol. Dialysis Transplant. 24(1): 73-84 (Jan. 2009).
Kang et al., “Efficient Transfer of Large-Area Graphene Films onto Rigid Substrates by Hot Pressing,” American Chemical Society Nano, 6(6): 5360-5365(May 28, 2012).
Kar et al., “Effect of glycation of hemoglobin on its interaction with trifluoperazine,” Protein J. 25(3): 202-211 (Apr. 2006) (available online Jun. 6, 2006).
Kawamoto et al., “Serum high molecular weight adiponectin is associated with mild renal dysfunction in Japanese adults,” J. Atherosclerosis Thrombosis 17(11): 1141-1148 (Nov. 27, 2011).
Khun et al. “From Microporous Regular Frameworks to Mesoporous Materials with Ultrahigh Surface Area: Dynamic reorganization of Porous Polvmer Networks” JACS, 2008; vol. 130; pgs. 13333-13337.
Krupka et al., “Measurements of the Sheet Resistance and Conductivity of Thin Epitaxial Graphene and SiC Films” Applied Physics Letters 96, 082101-I; Feb. 23, 2010.
Kumar et al., “Modulation of alpha-crystallin chaperone activity in diabetic rat lens by curcumin,” Molecular Vision 11: 561-568 (Jul. 26, 2005).
Lathuiliere et al., “Encapsulated Cellular Implants for Recombinant Protein Delivery and Therapeutic Modulation of the Immune System,” Journal of Applied Physics, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 16: 10578-10600 (May 8, 2015).
Lee, et al. “Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene.” science 321.5887 (2008): 385-388.
Li, R.H. “Materials for immunoisolated cell transplantation”. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 33, 87-109 (1998).
Lucchese et al. “Quantifying ion-induced defects and Raman relaxation length in graphene.” Carbon 48.5 (2010): 1592-1597.
Macleod et al. “Supramolecular Orderinng in Oligothiophene-Fullerene Monolayers” JACS, 2009, vol. 131, pgs. 16844-16850.
Mattevi et al. “A review of chemical vapour deposition of graphene on copper.” Journal of Materials Chemistry 21.10 (2011): 3324-3334.
Miao et al. “Chemical vapor deposition of grapheme” INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2011.
MIT/MTL Center for Graphene Devices and 2D Systems, retrieved from: http://www-mtl.mit.edu/wpmu/graphene/ [retrieved from Aug. 21, 2014 archive] (3 pages).
MIT/MTL Center for Graphene Devices and 2D Systems, retrieved from: http://www-mtl.mit.edu/wpmu/graphene/ [retrieved from Mar. 4, 2015 archive] (3 pages).
Nafea, et al. “Immunoisolating semi-permeable membranes for cell encapsulation: focus on hydrogels.” J Control Release. 154(2): 110-122 (Sep. 5, 2011).
Nezlin, “Circulating non-immune IgG complexes in health and disease,” Immunol. Lett. 122(2); 141-144 (Feb. 21, 2009) (available online Feb. 2, 2009).
Norata et al., “Plasma adiponectin levels in chronic kidney disease patients: relation with molecular inflammatory profile and metabolic status,” Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 20(1): 56-63 (Jan. 2010) (available online Apr. 9, 2009).
Ogawa et al., “Exosome-like vesicles in Gloydius blomhoffii blomhoffii venom,” Toxicon 51(6): 984-993 (May 2008) (available online Feb. 19, 2008).
Ohgawara et al. “Assessment of pore size of semipermeable membrane for immunoisolation on xenoimplatntation of pancreatic B cells using a diffusion chamber.” Transplant Proc. (6): 3319-3320. 1995.
Oki et al., “Combined acromegaly and subclinical Cushing disease related to high-molecular-weight adrenocorticotropic hormone,” J. Neurosurg. 110(2): 369-73 (Feb. 2009).
Osorio et al., “Effect of treatment with Iosartan on salt sensitivity and SGLT2 expression in hypertensive diabetic rats,” Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 86(3): e46-e49 (Dec. 2009) (available online Oct. 2, 2009).
Osorio et al., “Effect of phlorizin on SGLT2 expression in the kidney of diabetic rats,” J. Nephrol. 23(5): 541-546 (Sep.-Oct. 2010).
Padidela et al., “Elevated basal and post-feed glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) concentrations in the neonatal period,” Eur. J. Endocrinol. 160(1): 53-58 (Jan. 2009) (available online Oct. 24, 2008).
Pall Corporation, “Pall Water Processing Disc-Tube Filter Technology”, Retrieved on Feb. 10, 2015, Retrieved from http://www.pall.com/pdfs/Fuels-and-Chemicals/Disc-Tube—Filter—Technology-DT100b.pdF (15 pages).
Plant et al. “Size-dependent propagation of Au nanoclusters through few-layer grapheme,” The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013, Nanoscale.
Pollard, “Growing Graphene via Chemical Vapor” Department of Physics, Pomona College; May 2, 2011.
Rafael et al. “Cell Transplantation and Immunoisolation: Studies on a macroencapsultaion device.” From the Departments of Transplantation Pathology: Stockholm, Sweden (1999).
Rezania et al., “Enrichment of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived NKX6.1-Expressing Pancreatic Progenitor Cells Accelerates the Maturation of Insulin-Secreting Cells in Vivo”, Stem Cells Regenerative Medicine, vol. 31: 2432-2442 (Jul. 29, 2013).
Rezania et al., “Maturation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Pancreatic Progenitors Into Functional Islets Capable of Treating Pre-existing Diabetes in Mice”, Diabetes Journal, vol. 61: 2016-2029 (Aug. 1, 2012).
Ribeiro et al., “Binary Mutual Diffusion Coefficients of Aqueous Solutions of Sucrose, Lactose, Glucose, and Fructose in the Temperature Range from (298.15 to 328.15) K,” J. Chem. Eng. Data 51(5): 1836-1840 (Sep. 2006) (available online Jul. 20, 2006).
Rippe et al., “Size and charge selectivity of the glomerular filter in early experimental diabetes in rats,” Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 293(5): F1533-F1538 (Nov. 2007)(available online Aug. 15, 2007).
SA Final Rejection for Saudi Arabia Application No. 113340400 dated Jan. 28, 2016.
SA First Examination Report for Saudi Arabia Application No. 113340401 dated Apr. 28, 2015.
SA First Examination Report for Saudi Arabia Application No. 113340424 dated May 10, 2015.
SA First Examination Report for Saudi Arabia Application No. 113340426 dated May 12, 2015.
SA First Examination Report in Saudi Arabia Application No. 113340400 dated Apr. 13, 2015.
SA Second Examination Report for Saudi Arabia Application No. 113340400 dated Aug. 11, 2015.
Sanchez, et al. “Biological Interactions of Graphene-Family Nanomaterials——An Interdisciplinary Review.” Chem Res Toxicol. 25(1): 15-34 (Jan. 13, 2012).
Schweitzer, Handbook of Separation Techniques for Chemical Engineers, 1979, McGraw-Hill Book Company, pp. 2-5 to 2-8.
Sethna et al., “Serum adiponectin levels and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pediatric renal transplant recipients,” Transplantation 88(8): 1030-1037 (Oct. 27, 2009).
Sullivan et al., “Microarray analysis reveals novel gene expression changes associated with erectile dysfunction in diabetic rats,” Physiol. Genom. 23(2): 192-205 (Oct. 17, 2005) (available online Aug. 23, 2005).
Swett et al, “Imagining and Sculpting Graphene on the atomic scale” Oak Ridge National Laboratory's (ORNL) Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences (CNMS) Biannual Review. 1 page. No date.
Swett et al, “Supersonic Nanoparticle Interaction with Suspended CVD Graphene”, Microsc. Microanal. 22 (Suppl 3): 1670-1671 (Jul. 25, 2016).
Takata et al., “Hyperresistinemia is associated with coexistence of hypertension and type 2 diabetes,” Hypertension 51. 2 (Feb. 2008): 534-9.
Tamborlane et al., “Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Intensive Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes” N Engl J Med 359;14: 1464-1476 (Oct. 2, 2008).
Tanugi et al., “Nanoporous Graphene Could Outperform Best Commercial Water Desalination Techniques,” ; ACS 2012; Jun. 25, 2012; Weftec 2012; Sep. 29-Oct. 3.
Totani et al. “Gluten binds cytotoxic compounds generated in heated frying oil.” Journal of oleo science 57.12 (2008): 683-690.
Tsukamoto et al. “Purification, characterization and biological activities of a garlic oliqosaccharide,” Journal of UOEH 30.2 (Jun. 1, 2008): 147-57.
TW Office Action in Taiwanese Application No. 102146079 dated Apr. 14, 2017. 9 pages.(English translation).
TW Search Report in Taiwanese Application No. 102146079 dated Apr. 14, 2017. 1 page.
UMEA Universitet “Graphene nanoscrolls are formed by decoration of magnetic nanoparticles.” ScienceDaily. Aug. 15, 2013. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/08/130815084402.htm (3 pages).
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,150 dated Sep. 25, 2012.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/548,539 dated Aug. 18, 2015.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/548,539 dated Jul. 23, 2015.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/719,579 dated May 20 ,2016.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795276 dated Oct. 7, 2016.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,896 dated Apr. 1, 2015.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated Aug. 29, 2016.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated Jun. 2, 2016.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated Sep. 12, 2016.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/804,085 dated Jan. 15, 2015.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/804,085 dated Mar. 12, 2015.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,503 dated Oct. 14, 2016.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,503 dated Oct. 5, 2016.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,195 dated Jul. 5, 2016.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,530 dated Aug. 1, 2016.
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/203,655 dated Dec. 9, 2016.
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,150 dated Sep. 25, 2012.
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,276 dated Jan. 19, 2017.
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated Aug. 29, 2016.
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated Sep. 12, 2016.
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,770 dated May 5, 2017.
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,273 dated Jun. 9, 2017.
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,464 dated Jun. 16, 2017.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/548,539 dated Feb. 6, 2015.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/719,579 dated Jul. 8, 2015.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/719,579 dated May 4, 2016.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,276 dated Apr. 22, 2016.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,276 dated Oct. 6, 2015.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,896 dated Sep. 24, 2014.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated Aug. 11, 2014.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated May 28, 2015.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated Nov. 18, 2015.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,503 dated Mar. 22, 2016.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/031,300 dated Jan. 20, 2016.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/031,300 dated Jul. 7, 2015.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,195 dated Mar. 21, 2016.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,195 dated Nov. 4, 2015.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,530 dated Feb. 29, 2016.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/203,655 dated Aug. 10, 2016.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,190 dated May 18, 2017.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,657 dated Jul. 7, 2017.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/686,452 dated Jun. 9, 2017.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/843,944 dated Jun. 23, 2017.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,471 dated May 31, 2017.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,741 dated Dec. 1, 2016.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,193 dated Jul. 19, 2017.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,944 dated Feb. 9, 2017.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,944 dated Jul. 13, 2017.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/336,545 dated Dec. 19, 2016.
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/453,441 dated Jun. 5, 2017.
US Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007 dated Apr. 24, 2017.
US Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,617 dated Apr. 4, 2017.
US Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,335 dated Apr. 25, 2017.
US Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/332,982 dated Jan. 30, 2017.
US Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795276 dated Nov. 29, 2016.
Vallon,“Micropuncturing the nephron,” Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology 458. 1 (May 2009): 189-201.
Van Der Zande et al. “Large-scale arrays of single-layer graphene resonators.” Nano letters 10.12 (2010): 4869-4873.
Verdonck, P., “Plasma Etching”, in Oficina de Microfabricao: Projeto e Construcao de CI's MOS, Swart, J.W., Ed., Campinas (Sao Paulo, Brazil): UNICAMP, 2006, ch. 10, p. 9.
Vlassiouk et al. “Large scale atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition of graphene.” Carbon 54 (2013): 58-67.
Vriens et al. “Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies.” European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 37.7 (2010): 1408-1425.
Wang et al., “Direct Observation of a Long-Lived Single-Atom Catalyst Chiseling Atomic Structures in Graphene,” Nano Lett., 2014, pp. A-F.
Wang et al., “Porous Nanocarbons: Molecular Filtration and Electronics,” Advances in Graphene Science, Edited by Mahmood Aliofkhazraei, (2013) ISBN 978-953-51/1182-5, Publisher: InTech; Chapter 6, pp. 119-160.
Wang et al.,“What is the role of the second ”structural “ NADP−−binding site in human glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase?,”Protein science a publication of the Protein Society 17. 8 (Aug. 2008): 1403-11.
Wei et al., “Synthesis of N-doped graphene by chemical vapor deposition and its electrical properties”, Nano Lett. 2009 9 1752-58.
Xiaogan Liang et al., Formation of Bandgap and Subbands in Graphene Nanomeshes with Sub-10nm Ribbon Width Fabricated via Nanoimprint Lithography., Nano Letters, Jun. 11, 2010, pp. 24542460.
Xie et al., “Fractionation and characterization of biologically-active polysaccharides from Artemisia tripartite,” Phytochemistry 69. 6 (Apr. 2008): 1359-71.
Xie, et al. “Controlled fabrication of high-quality carbon nanoscrolls from monolayer graphene.” Nano letters 9.7 (2009): 2565-2570.
Yagil et al. “Nonproteinuric diabetes-associated nephropathy in the Cohen rat model of type 2 diabetes” Diabetes 54. 5 (May 2005): 1487-96.
Zan et al. “Interaction of Metals with Suspended Graphene Observed by Transmission Electron Microscopy”, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., Mar. 8, 2012, 3, 953-958.
Zhang et al. “Effect of Chemical Oxidation on the Structure of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes”, J. Phys. Chem., Feb. 12, 2003, B 107 3712-8.
Zhang et al. “Method for anisotropic etching of graphite or graphene” Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Peop. Rep. China; Mar. 30, 2011.
Zhang et al. “Production of Graphene Sheets by Direct Dispersion with Aromatic Healing Agents”, Small, May 6, 2010, vol. 6, No. 10, 1100-1107.
Zhang et al. “Isolation and activity of an alpha-amylase inhibitor from white kidney beans,” Yao xue xue bao =Acta pharmaceutica Sinica 42. 12 (Dec. 2007): 1282-7.
Zhao, et al. “Efficient preparation of large-area graphene oxide sheets for transparent conductive films.” ACS nano 4.9 (2010): 5245-5252.
Zhou, K., et al., “One-pot preparation of graphene/ Fe304 composites by a solvothermal reaction,” New J. Chem., 2010, 34, 2950.
Zhu et al. “Carbon Nanotubes in Biomedicine and Biosensing”, Carbon Nanotubes-Growth and Applications, InTech, (Aug. 9, 2011) Chapter 6: pp. 135-162. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/carbon-nanotubes-growth-and-applications/carbon-nanotubes-in-biomedicine-and-biosensing.
Ziegelmeier et al. “Adipokines influencing metabolic and cardiovascular disease are differentially regulated in maintenance hemodialysis,” Metabolism: clinical and experimental 57. 10 (Oct. 2008): 1414-21.
Zirk et al. “A refractometry-based glucose analysis of body fluids,” Medical engineering & physics 29. 4 (May 2007): 449-58.
Zyga “Nanoporous Graphene Could Outperform Best Commercial Water Desalination Techniques,” Phys.org., Jun. 22, 2012, Retrieved from http://www.phys.org/pdf259579929.pdf [Last Accessed Dec. 3, 2014] (3 pages).
U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007, dated Feb. 28, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,471, dated Sep. 16, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,295, dated Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,410, dated Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,420, dated Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,289, dated Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,447, dated Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,269, dated Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,239, dated Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,464, dated Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,276, dated Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,482, dated Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,056, dated Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,099, dated Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,190, dated Mar. 12, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,304, dated Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,588, dated Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/707,808, dated May 8, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,273, dated Aug. 5, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,198, dated Sep. 16, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/754,531, dated Jun. 29, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,770, dated Jan. 30, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,657, dated Mar. 12, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,325, dated Jan. 29, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,580, dated Mar. 12, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/480,569, dated May 25, 2012.
PCT Application PCT/US2015/028948, dated May 1, 2015.
PCT Application PCT/US2015/018114, dated Feb. 27, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/843,944, dated Sep. 2, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,193, dated Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/308,351, dated Nov. 1, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,753, dated Mar. 16, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,276, dated Mar. 12, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/804,085, dated Mar. 14, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958, dated Mar. 14, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,896, dated Mar. 14, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/779,963, dated Feb. 28, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,944, dated Oct. 10, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,796, dated Feb. 27, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,195, dated Mar. 7, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,530, dated Mar. 7, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,802, dated Mar. 3, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,741, dated Sep. 18, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/336,545, dated Oct. 27, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/971,922, dated Dec. 16, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/686,452, dated Apr. 14, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/332,982, dated Oct. 24, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/719,579, dated Dec. 19, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,150, dated Aug. 25, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/548,539, dated Jul. 13, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/031,300, dated Sep. 19, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/410,457, dated Jan. 19, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,335, dated Mar. 12, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,617, dated Mar. 12, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/589,135, dated May 8, 2017.
CN Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201580006829.5 dated Aug. 1, 2017. (English translation) (8 pages).
EP Office Action for European Application No. 15743307.9 dated Aug. 8, 2017. (17 pages).
European Search Report dated Aug. 28, 2017 from related EP application 15743750.0. (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 14, 2017 from related PCT application PCT/US2017/031537. (12 pages).
Jiang, L. et al., Design of advanced porous grapheme materials: from grapheme nanomesh to 3D architectures. Nanoscale, Oct. 16, 2013, vol. 6, pp. 1922-1945.
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-503405 dated Jun. 28, 2017. (English translation) (6 pages).
Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 14, 2017 for Singapore Application No. 11201606287V. (10 pages).
Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 22, 2017 for Singapore Application No. 11201607584P. (7 pages).
Sears et al., “Recent Developments in Carbon Nanotube Membranes for Water Purification and Gas Separation” Materials, vol. 3 (Jan. 4, 2010), pp. 127-149.
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007 dated Sep. 6, 2017. (9 pages).
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,770 dated Sep. 26, 2017. (12 pages).
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 15/332,982 dated Sep. 21, 2017. (5 pages).
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,325 dated Aug. 25, 2017. (7 pages).
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/332,982 dated Aug. 18, 2017. (9 pages).
EPO Extended Search Report for European Application No. 171684883.5 dated Jul. 25, 2017 (8 pages).
EPO Supplementary Search Report for European Application No. 15762019.6 dated Aug. 9, 2017 (16 pages).
US Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,099 dated Oct. 5, 2017 (11 pages).
US Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,447 dated Oct. 3, 2017 (21 pages).
Weisen, et al., “Fabrication of nanopores in a graphene sheet with heavy ions: A molecular dynamics study”, Journal of Applied Physics 114, 234304 (2013), pp. 234304-1 to 234304-6.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150258503 A1 Sep 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61951930 Mar 2014 US